CONSULTATION MATRIX

Date of
Consultation
Advises from the mentor Actions taken Signature of the
Mentor
January 7,
2014
The mentor had assigned introductory reading
materials on research to the group.
The group had complied on the advice of
the mentor.

January 13,
2014
Identification of changes after reading
the material on the submitted chapter 1
of the research proposal
Discussion of the reading materials
Shared a related video about the
research topic titled Head to head:
What is wrong with Islam today?

The group had complied on the advice of
the mentor.

January 14,
2014
Revision of the submitted chapter 1 of
the research proposal
Readings for RRL
o Substantiate the paper with
authorities
o Stipulate the research problem
o Have a clear and definite
objective
o Justify the research problem;
justify the study

Advise a management technique
(consistent meeting with the group)
Assignment of tasks between the group
Act as a group; collective formulation
of ideas!
The group had complied on the advice of
the mentor on the following aspects:
1. Chapter 1
Changing the term Operational
Definition of Variables and Other
Terms to Definitions (see p. 5 )
Background of the study has
already focused on the research
problem
Changing the format of the research
objectives into interrogative
statements (Statement of the
Problem)
Researching for the justification of
the research problem
2. Consensus towards scheduled
meetings (MWF and Saturday
meetings of the group)

3. Each has been assigned with a
specific task to work onto

February 20,
2014
Chapter 1:
o Revise the statement of the
problem; it should be coherent
with the research problem and
the RRL.
o Provide basis towards specific
claims of the background of the
study
o Advises on how Theoretical
Lens should be identified and
applied in the study
Chapter 3:
o Justification and Description of
the Research Locale
o Provide qualifiers on the units of
analysis
o Removal of the concept of
variables and measures
o Research instrument section is
to be a part of the data collection
process
o Revision of the Data Analysis
section
Assigned reading material
for Data Analysis
o Additional inputs or aspects on
the ethical considerations of the
study

The group had complied on the advice of
the mentor on the following aspects:
1. Chapter 1:
Revision and reduction of the
scope of the Statement of
the Problem (see p. 3)
Supplemented basis on the
claims of the Background of
the Study (see p. 2, para. 1,
last statement)
Usage of a theory in
formulating the Statement of
the Problem
2. Chapter 3:
Supplemented justification
and description of the
Research Locale (see p.20)
Provided qualifiers on the
Unit of Analysis (see p. 20)
Integration of the research
instrument in the Data
Collection section (see p. 21)
Revision of the Data Analysis
(see p. 23)
Revision of the Ethical
Considerations (see p. 24)


March 13,
2014
Chapter 1:
o Substantiate or add authorities
on the claims and arguments of
the background of the study
o Revision of the statements with
regard to MNLF and the two
authors presented
o Rewriting of one of the
statements which had implied
that the study was already
conducted
o Revision of the word impacts to
perceived impacts on one of
the statement of the problem
o Further elaboration of the
Theoretical Lens
o Concretized the significance the
study shall provide to the
beneficiaries
o Omission of the concept
influence in the Definitions
o Definition of the word perceived
impacts
Chapter 3:
o Replace age and year of
involvement to gate keeper as
the determinant (or who shall
determine) of the potential
respondents
o Omission of the word degree
and replace it with extent found
on the data collection part
The group had complied on the advice of
the mentor on the following aspects:
1. Chapter 1:
Added authorities on the
claims and arguments of the
background of the study (see
para. 1 & 2, p. 1; para. 1,
p.2)
Revised statements with
regard to MNLF and the two
authors presented (see para.
2, p.2)
Revised statement which
had implied that the study
was already conducted (see
first statement of the first
para., p. 3)
Added paragraph on the
Theoretical lens (see p. 4)
Concretized significance of
the study (see pp. 5-6)
Omitted word, influence, and
added concept to be defined
-> perceived impacts (see p.
8)
2. Chapter 3:
Revision of the qualifiers of
the respondents (see pp. 23-
24)
Omission of the word
degree and replacement of
it with extent found in the
data collection (see p. 25)