Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Sunder Baby Elephant in Trouble Again: Supreme Court of India Issued Notice On Vinay Kore Petition - Abhishek Kadyan

    Hochgeladen von

    Naresh Kadyan
    351 Ansichten2 Seiten
    NOTICE under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra: Sunder’s shocking beatings have been caught on videotape, and veterinarians and elephant experts who examined him found him scarred, wounded and chained so tightly that he couldn’t lie down. The Jyotiba temple came into possession of Sunder in 2007, but after constant chaining and beatings came to light, Maharashtra Minister of Forests Dr Patangrao Kadam and the Project Elephant division of the Ministry of Environment and Forests issued orders for Sunder’s release to a sanctuary on 21 August 2012 and 9 November 2012, respectively. However, those orders were never carried out, and Sunder was then whisked away at the behest of the Member of Legislative Assembly Vinay Kore and hidden in an old poultry shed, where he remained chained. In December 2013, PETA India obtained new video footage showing that his mahout was violently beating him. Now, at long last, it looks like Sunder’s suffering could be over. The next step will be to transfer Sunder to the Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre in Bangalore, after the High Court orders dated April 7, 2014. As per our information PETA India have sufficient evidences to book all offenders for the violation of the section 3 and 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 read with the section 39 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. It would be pertinent to mention here that Hon'ble supreme Court of India passed an order on dated May 7, 2014 upholding animal rights, copy of this order attached here with for ready reference. OIPA - Indian People for Animals in the opinion that: 1. The Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra failed to perform his official duties, while dealing Sunder baby elephant matter, where as Vinay Kore, MLA along with all other co offenders needs to be booked under law of the land. 2. Animal Welfare Board of India along with the Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Environment and Forest) also failed to handle the said matter. 3. Vinay Kore, MLA does not abide with his fundamental duties, as defined under article 51 A (g) of Indian Constitution, while handling Sunder baby elephant, besides it he has violated the relevant section of OATH, which he has taken being MLA. Hon'ble Speaker of Maharashtra Assembly is here by requested to look in to and disqualify the membership of Vinay Kore being an animal abuser, violator of OATH as well. 4. Director General of Maharashtra Police is here by requested to please direct concerned Police officers to book all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA for the violation of said legislation's. 5. OIPA - Indian People for Animals placed this notice under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra for strict legal action against all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA and rescue Sunder immediately for further rehabilitation, it is expected that Wildlife officials have taken charge of Sunder after High Court verdict and now Sunder be in their custody

    Originaltitel

    Sunder baby elephant in trouble again: Supreme Court of India issued notice on Vinay Kore petition - Abhishek Kadyan

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOCX, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    NOTICE under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra: Sunder’s shocking beatings have been caught on videotape, and veterinarians and elephant experts who examined him found him scarred, wounded and chained so tightly that he couldn’t lie down. The Jyotiba temple came into possession of Sunder in 2007, but after constant chaining and beatings came to light, Maharashtra Minister of Forests Dr Patangrao Kadam and the Project Elephant division of the Ministry of Environment and Forests issued orders for Sunder’s release to a sanctuary on 21 August 2012 and 9 November 2012, respectively. However, those orders were never carried out, and Sunder was then whisked away at the behest of the Member of Legislative Assembly Vinay Kore and hidden in an old poultry shed, where he remained chained. In December 2013, PETA India obtained new video footage showing that his mahout was violently beating him. Now, at long last, it looks like Sunder’s suffering could be over. The next step will be to transfer Sunder to the Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre in Bangalore, after the High Court orders dated April 7, 2014. As per our information PETA India have sufficient evidences to book all offenders for the violation of the section 3 and 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 read with the section 39 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. It would be pertinent to mention here that Hon'ble supreme Court of India passed an order on dated May 7, 2014 upholding animal rights, copy of this order attached here with for ready reference. OIPA - Indian People for Animals in the opinion that: 1. The Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra failed to perform his official duties, while dealing Sunder baby elephant matter, where as Vinay Kore, MLA along with all other co offenders needs to be booked under law of the land. 2. Animal Welfare Board of India along with the Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Environment and Forest) also failed to handle the said matter. 3. Vinay Kore, MLA does not abide with his fundamental duties, as defined under article 51 A (g) of Indian Constitution, while handling Sunder baby elephant, besides it he has violated the relevant section of OATH, which he has taken being MLA. Hon'ble Speaker of Maharashtra Assembly is here by requested to look in to and disqualify the membership of Vinay Kore being an animal abuser, violator of OATH as well. 4. Director General of Maharashtra Police is here by requested to please direct concerned Police officers to book all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA for the violation of said legislation's. 5. OIPA - Indian People for Animals placed this notice under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra for strict legal action against all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA and rescue Sunder immediately for further rehabilitation, it is expected that Wildlife officials have taken charge of Sunder after High Court verdict and now Sunder be in their custody

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    351 Ansichten2 Seiten

    Sunder Baby Elephant in Trouble Again: Supreme Court of India Issued Notice On Vinay Kore Petition - Abhishek Kadyan

    Hochgeladen von

    Naresh Kadyan
    NOTICE under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra: Sunder’s shocking beatings have been caught on videotape, and veterinarians and elephant experts who examined him found him scarred, wounded and chained so tightly that he couldn’t lie down. The Jyotiba temple came into possession of Sunder in 2007, but after constant chaining and beatings came to light, Maharashtra Minister of Forests Dr Patangrao Kadam and the Project Elephant division of the Ministry of Environment and Forests issued orders for Sunder’s release to a sanctuary on 21 August 2012 and 9 November 2012, respectively. However, those orders were never carried out, and Sunder was then whisked away at the behest of the Member of Legislative Assembly Vinay Kore and hidden in an old poultry shed, where he remained chained. In December 2013, PETA India obtained new video footage showing that his mahout was violently beating him. Now, at long last, it looks like Sunder’s suffering could be over. The next step will be to transfer Sunder to the Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre in Bangalore, after the High Court orders dated April 7, 2014. As per our information PETA India have sufficient evidences to book all offenders for the violation of the section 3 and 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 read with the section 39 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. It would be pertinent to mention here that Hon'ble supreme Court of India passed an order on dated May 7, 2014 upholding animal rights, copy of this order attached here with for ready reference. OIPA - Indian People for Animals in the opinion that: 1. The Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra failed to perform his official duties, while dealing Sunder baby elephant matter, where as Vinay Kore, MLA along with all other co offenders needs to be booked under law of the land. 2. Animal Welfare Board of India along with the Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Environment and Forest) also failed to handle the said matter. 3. Vinay Kore, MLA does not abide with his fundamental duties, as defined under article 51 A (g) of Indian Constitution, while handling Sunder baby elephant, besides it he has violated the relevant section of OATH, which he has taken being MLA. Hon'ble Speaker of Maharashtra Assembly is here by requested to look in to and disqualify the membership of Vinay Kore being an animal abuser, violator of OATH as well. 4. Director General of Maharashtra Police is here by requested to please direct concerned Police officers to book all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA for the violation of said legislation's. 5. OIPA - Indian People for Animals placed this notice under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 before the Chief Wildlife Warden of Maharashtra for strict legal action against all offenders including Vinay Kore, MLA and rescue Sunder immediately for further rehabilitation, it is expected that Wildlife officials have taken charge of Sunder after High Court verdict and now Sunder be in their custody

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 2

    ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.

    9 SECTION IX

    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal
    (Civil)
    No(s).11865-11866/2014

    (From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2014
    in WPC
    No.2662/2013,WPC No.887/2014 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)


    VINAY V. KORE Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Respondent(s)

    (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
    Judgment,exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief)


    Date: 09/05/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.


    CORAM :
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL



    For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv.
    Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.
    Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv.

    For Respondent(s) Mr. Raj Panjwani, Sr. Adv.
    Nos. 4 and 6 Mr. Sandeep Gupta, Adv.
    Mr. Jayesh Kanaksinh Ashar,AOR

    UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R


    Issue notice to the respondents, returnable for

    29.05.2014. Dasti, in addition.

    Respondent nos. 4 and 6 have entered appearance.

    Let notice issue to the other
    respondents,

    returnable on 29.05.2014. Service be effected through their

    Standing Counsel in this Court, in addition to
    dasti

    process.
    2

    Short affidavit has been filed on behalf of

    respondent nos. 4 and 6 in Court today. The same is taken

    on record, subject to all just exceptions. Copy thereof has

    been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

    Learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 6 has

    invited our attention to letter dated 8.5.2014 (Annexure

    R8), appended to his affidavit. We have perused the

    aforesaid letter. We would, however, require the Wildlife

    Rescue & Rehabilitation Centre, Bangalore to clarify the

    manner in which "Sunder" will be housed, keeping in view the

    contents of its earlier letter dated 17.12.2013 (Annexure

    P-15), annexed with the special leave petition.

    Learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 6 may

    obtain instructions, and file the necessary affidavit.

    List on 29.05.2014.

    Instructions, if any, be obtained before the next

    date of hearing.



    (Parveen Kr.Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
    Court Master Assistant Registrar

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen