100%(2)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (2 Abstimmungen)
2K Ansichten1 Seite
1) The document discusses Ikujiro Nonaka's theory of the "knowledge-creating company", which views a company not as a machine but as a living organism that is continuously evolving through knowledge creation.
2) Nonaka differentiates between tacit knowledge, which is subjective and difficult to articulate, and explicit knowledge, which can be more easily communicated. He proposes four patterns of knowledge conversion between these forms.
3) The example is given of how Matsushita Electric developed a dough maker by having an employee learn the tacit skills of a baker, articulate that knowledge into a software model, develop an explicit product, and internalize new knowledge through experience, demonstrating Nonaka's spiral model of
Originalbeschreibung:
One Page Summary of revolutionary article by Mr. Ikujiro Nonaka.
1) The document discusses Ikujiro Nonaka's theory of the "knowledge-creating company", which views a company not as a machine but as a living organism that is continuously evolving through knowledge creation.
2) Nonaka differentiates between tacit knowledge, which is subjective and difficult to articulate, and explicit knowledge, which can be more easily communicated. He proposes four patterns of knowledge conversion between these forms.
3) The example is given of how Matsushita Electric developed a dough maker by having an employee learn the tacit skills of a baker, articulate that knowledge into a software model, develop an explicit product, and internalize new knowledge through experience, demonstrating Nonaka's spiral model of
1) The document discusses Ikujiro Nonaka's theory of the "knowledge-creating company", which views a company not as a machine but as a living organism that is continuously evolving through knowledge creation.
2) Nonaka differentiates between tacit knowledge, which is subjective and difficult to articulate, and explicit knowledge, which can be more easily communicated. He proposes four patterns of knowledge conversion between these forms.
3) The example is given of how Matsushita Electric developed a dough maker by having an employee learn the tacit skills of a baker, articulate that knowledge into a software model, develop an explicit product, and internalize new knowledge through experience, demonstrating Nonaka's spiral model of
By Ikujiro Nonaka What is the knowledge-creating company? We may have a question of how knowledge can be created in a company because knowledge gives more of a feeling of life. This insightful article not only explains how knowledge can be created but also provides several illustrations of how Japanese Companies like Matsushita, Honda, Canon and others became extremely successful due to their knowledge creating capabilities and disseminating it throughout the organization, and embodying it in products, services and systems overcoming the tough competition, shifting market trends and short product life cycle.
The more holistic approach to knowledge at many Japanese companies founded the important fundamental insight that a company is not a machine but a living organism much like an individual that is continuously evolving and can have a collective sense of identity, understanding and fundamental purpose. In this respect, the knowledge creating company is as much about ideals as it is about ideas. Inventing new knowledge is not a specialized activity but a way of behaving, indeed a way of being, in which everyone is a knowledge worker that is to say, an entrepreneur.
The author has differentiated knowledge into tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge and provided four basic patterns for creating knowledge which exist in dynamic interaction resulting in the spiral model of knowledge creation. Tacit knowledge is the valuable and highly subjective insights and intuitions that are difficult to formalize and communicate to others. It consists of mental models, beliefs, and perspectives so ingrained that we take them for granted and therefore cannot easily articulate them. For this very reason, these implicit models profoundly shape how we perceive the world around us. On the other hand, explicit knowledge is formal and systematic. So, it can be easily communicated and shared, in product specifications or a scientific formula or a computer program.
Mr. Nonaka has given the detailed illustration of how Osaka-based Matsushita Electric Company developed a dough maker from the stretching technique of the baker of the popular Osaka International Hotel to explain the knowledge creation process. The software developer Ms. Ikuko Tanaka of Matsushita Company learns the tacit skill of the baker through observation, imitation and practice. This becomes the part of her knowledge base (socialization). This is tacit to tacit conversion of knowledge. Tanaka then articulates her tacit knowledge of bread making to formalize the specifications and develop a software model which is the tacit to explicit knowledge conversion (articulation). Based on this model, Tanaka and her team developed the dough maker which presents the explicit to explicit knowledge conversion (combination). Finally, through the experience of a new product, Tanaka and her team enrich their knowledge base. This is explicit to tacit conversion (internalization). Articulation and internalization are the critical steps in the spiral of knowledge. The reason is that both require the active involvement of the self that is, personal commitment.
The spiral or cyclic process of knowledge conversion between tacit and explicit knowledge is a continuous process and results in a creation of new knowledge. The key to this process is personal commitment, individuals sense of identity with the enterprise and its mission. Making personal knowledge available to others is the central activity. It takes place continuously and at all levels of the organization. The beautiful and more important aspect of knowledge creation is that anything can be the source for the new knowledge be that be the conflict or chaos in an organization, metaphors, slogans or mission.
Thanks to Mr. Nonaka for bringing the concept of knowledge creation which existed between us much before but in a hidden form. He has beautifully uncovered the entire process. I personally believe that this vision will definitely provide the new dimension to our management practice and also become milestone for the development of Knowledge Systems.