1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Page 1 of 5
STATE OF MAINE
KENNEBEC, ss
DOCKET NO. AUGSC-CR-2012-286


STATE OF MAINE *
PLAINTIFF *
v *
GINA TURCOTTE *
DEFENDANT *


NOW COMES GINA TURCOTTE, sui juris, all rights expressly and irrevocably
reserved, and gives this court judicial notice that DEFENDANT does not oppose
HAROLD HAINKEs Motion to Withdraw as a privately contracted, state-paid stand-by
legal counsel, for the following reasons:
1. Harold Hainke has alleged and is presumed to be a practiced attorney having
full knowledge and understanding of court, evidentiary, and appellate rules
which he was contracted to convey to DEFENDANT to ensure a lawful trial.
2. Harold Hainke has proven himself to be legally incompetent, nunc pro tunc.
3. Harold Hainke has refused to participate in DEFENDANTs constitutionally
lawful strategy which secured full dismissals of seven illegal criminal charges.
4. Harold Hainke clearly expressed his disbelief in DEFENDANTs legal strategy
in June 2012 by stating, GinA, you will NOT get these charges dismissed in
Superior Court. You will need to appeal your case all the way to the Supreme
Court of the United States if you want any justice.
5. Harold Hainke has repeatedly, knowingly and willfully breached a carefully
constructed Legal Services Agreement (contract), as follows:
a. Paragraph 2 states, Ms. Turcottedid not want an attorney to act on
her behalf, but wanted an attorney to be available to advise her as to
JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO
HAROLD HAINKEs MOTION TO WITHDRAW
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Page 2 of 5
court procedures and render other legal advice. This arrangement is
referred to as stand-by counsel.
b. Paragraph 3 states, Gina L. Turcotte will act as her own attorney and
have all the duties and responsibilities of an attorneyincluding
communicating with the Court, the District Attorney and any other
persons,making objections to the District Attorneys presentation of
evidence and responding to the District Attorneys objections to her
presentation of evidenceShe will make all the decisions concerning her
case, including the legal strategy to pursue.
c. Paragraph 4 states, Mr. Hainke will not have the traditional
responsibilities concerning the allocation of authority between Attorney
and Client and the scope of his representation will be limited to the
duties of stand-by counselMr. Hainke shall assist Ms. Turcotte with the
presentation of her case and be available to render legal advice upon her
request.
d. Paragraph 5 states, which was deliberately included by DEFENDANT,
Therefore, Mr. Hainke will not communicate with any party in
this matter unless Gina L. Turcotte is present and has expressly
given Mr. Hainke authority to offer counsel.
e. The Legal Services Agreement does not give Harold Hainke any right to
receive nor to submit any official legal documentation to or from the
court or any other party on DEFENDANTs behalf.
f. The Legal Services Agreement ends with a proclamation, WE HAVE
EACH READ THE ABOVE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING IT.
g. Both Harold Hainke, Esq. and Gina L. Turcotte personally signed the
Legal Services Agreement in each others presence after discussing and
agreeing on its explicit terms on June 5, 2012.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Page 3 of 5
h. During a meeting in February 2013 between DEFENDANT and District
Attorney Maeghan Maloney, Harold Hainke tried coercing DEFENDANT
into pleading guilty to two bogus criminal charges despite evidence of
her innocence and the States persistent violations of due process.
i. The end result of that plea agreement was a conviction for Refusal to
Submit to Arrest despite being charged without legal or factual merits.
j. During a motion hearing before Judge Marden on December 4, 2013,
DEFENDANT demanded a dismissal of all charges for the States utter
contempt for and violation of due process, the rules of court procedure,
rules of exculpatory evidence, and basic maxims of constitutional law.
k. Judge Marden denied DEFENDANTs 3
rd
Motion to Dismiss setting trial
by jury for December 18, 2013 without any supporting evidence.
l. DEFENDANT properly and immediately appealed Judge Mardens illegal
decision to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court and gave proper written
notice to this court, Joelle Pratt and Harold Hainke of the appeal.
m. This record shows the court, Joelle Pratt and Harold Hainke all had
proper notice that a proper appeal was filed on December 5, 2013.
n. MRAppP Rule 3(b) unambiguously states, The trial court shall take no
further action pending disposition of the appeal by the Law Court
o. During an off-the-record informal conversation with Harold Hainke on
December 18, 2013 prior to trial, Joelle Pratt withdrew Counts 1, 3, 4,
5, 6, and 7 due to lack of credible witnesses and supporting evidence.
p. Joelle Pratt further corroborated the absurdity of Count 2 by offering to
dismiss that charge on December 17, 2014 if DEFENDANT plead guilty
to Count 2 on that day, December 18, 2013 under deferred disposition.
q. Joelle Pratt is liable for violating DEFENDANTs due process rights.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Page 4 of 5
r. On December 18, 2013, DEFENDANT expressly restated her innocence
on the record declaring several constitutional and due process abuses.
s. Harold Hainke knowingly and willfully conspired with Michaela Murphy
and Joelle Pratt to violate the Maine Constitution and court rules by
accepting a guilty plea from DEFENDANT while an appeal was pending.
t. DEFENDANT innocently agreed vis compulsiva to plead guilty under
deferred disposition unaware Michaela Murphy, Joelle Pratt and Harold
Hainke had conspired to violate court rules to wrongly oppress her.
u. DEFENDANT has always fully intended to use the December 18, 2013
recorded hearing as prima facie evidence of fraud and corruption.
v. DEFENDANTs innocence was reaffirmed on December 18, 2013 when
Joelle Pratt and this court ordered dismissal of Count 2 on December
17, 2014 without further taxing or penalizing DEFENDANT.
w. On December 18, 2013, Harold Hainke said, GinA, I dont know how
you did it but you did it! You got all the charges dismissed!
x. Throughout this entire case history, Harold Hainke has declared that
he is not my attorney and has no obligation to protect my rights.
y. Despite Harold Hainke repeatedly denying any attorney-client status,
he has repeatedly sent and accepted written communications from the
court and knowingly communicated with the court, Joelle Pratt and
other parties about this case expressly failing in all his legal duties.
z. Harold Hainkes legal role has been de minimus having had no impact
on the current dismissed status.
6. Harold Hainke has stated, Being threatened by Ms. Turcotte makes it
unreasonably difficult for me to continue to be available to consult with her.
7. DEFENDANT disclaims making threats to anyone reaffirming and reiterating
her intention to pursue all proper remedies for all constitutional violations.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

JUDICIAL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Page 5 of 5
8. The allegations cited above are not all-inclusive and are subject to change.

WHEREFORE, DEFENDANT hereby nullifies her contract with Harold Hainke,
nunc pro tunc, and releases him from all future legal duties to DEFENDANT as
written in their Legal Services Agreement.

FURTHERMORE, DEFENDANT expressly prohibits Harold Hainke from
having any further discussions about this case with this court, the PLAINTIFF,
Joelle Pratt and any other party.

Signed in Augusta, Maine on this 14
th
day of May, 2014.

In Peace,


GINA TURCOTTE
32 COURT ST APT 1
AUGUSTA, MAINE

The attached document was served upon all parties by hand delivering a copy
to the court, the District Attorneys office and Harold Hainkes office in Augusta on
this day.

Signed in Augusta, Maine on this 14
th
day of May, 2014.

In Peace,


GINA TURCOTTE
32 COURT ST APT 1
AUGUSTA, MAINE