Facilitating Adult Learning For Social Change (FALSCH) Session Planning Template
Title: Group 6 Appreciative Inquiry Facilitation for Improving DPMI
Time: 30 minutes (+ 10 minutes of feedback) Participants: 12-15 Facilitators Intentions (Whats behind the curtain?): Teaching participants to use and apply Appreciative Inquiry through a questions posing simulation. Learning Objectives/Participants Take Away: Participants become familiar with Appreciative Inquiry method and feel comfortable using it in their professional and personal lives as a facilitator. Materials: post it notes, flipcharts, markers Agenda Overview: Activity Time Needed Materials/Resources Introduction/Energizer/ IceBreaker 5 minutes Split into groups and tackle questions (card and chart) 10 min post it notes, pens Guided discussion (reflection and leading into Appreciative Inquiry explanation) 10 min visual to explain the 4D method of Appreciative Inquiry Conclusion 5 minutes
Detailed Description of Activities: We started with an icebreaker to get participants juices flowing, the energy up and establishing a safe environment. We briefly explained the purpose of the exercise and what appreciative inquiry is and then had the group split into two smaller groups to increase participation level. We then asked participants to card and chart (put their ideas on post it notes on the wall and group them) in response to the following questions: What is the greatest strength of DPMI? How could we, as participants, contribute even further to that strength? What is DPMIs biggest problem? How can we improve it The idea is that there is one question that is in the spirit of appreciative inquiry and another that falls within the more conventional, traditional problem solving framework, to provide a point of contrast between the two methods. Next we came together as a big group and debriefed as well as discussed how the questions affected their thought process or how they felt and consequently came up with recommendations. Finally, we provided a brief conclusion and went over the key points. Notes To My FALSCH Self (Am I walking the talk?): How does my content address issues of power and privilege in society? Does it help to build more inclusive, equitable and sustainable communities, societies and social institution? Our activity involved everyone in the group as the discussion was oriented around the DPMI experience. It helped because it was relatable and relevant to each participant. They felt like they had a sense of ownership in what they were discussing. How do my facilitation strategies address issues of power, privilege and participation in the session? Are we walking the talk? Flexible and responsive: We also changed the context of the topic, which was addressing needed flexibility. Card and Chart Physical Space was equal and fully utilized. Active involvement : We created a more inclusive environment by breaking the large group into two smaller groups, allowing people to feel safe sharing their ideas.