Why I Killed Gandhi

f V _
Q
m
(https://www.facebook.com/SanskritiCultureOfIndia) (https://twitter.com/IndianSanskriti)
(https://plus.google.com/u/0/105871646788034619689/posts) (http://www.youtube.com
/user/SanskritiCulture/) (http://feeds.feedburner.com/sanskritimagazine/krKO)
MOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLES MOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLES MOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLES MOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLES
Why I Killed Gandhi Why I Killed Gandhi Why I Killed Gandhi Why I Killed Gandhi
Nathuram Godses Final Address to the Court
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com)
/search/)
( (( (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/ http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/ http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/ http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/) )) )
Our New Initiative: Water Booths (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/charitable-initiatives/new-initiative-
water-booths/
/history/akbar-great-monarch-
tyrant/)
/indian-religions/hinduism
/scientific-reason-behind-hanging-
leaves-doors/)
/ethical_living/varakhsilver-
foil-vegetarian/)

Translate
Share this with your friends
Why I Killed Gandhi http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/india/why-i-killed-gandhi/
1 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by
Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police station at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began
on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.
An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was
upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May
5, 1949.
Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, I
have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with
the task of deciding Godses appeal, they would have brought a verdict of not Guilty by an overwhelming
majority
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02
/08FL!""#$!%&"'()1**+24+g.,pg-./0 % 2%LL)' &$!'/%
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/3s4gandhi56405740-
Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/indian-religions/hinduism/) religion, Hindu
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/indian-religions/hinduism/) history and Hindu culture
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/culture/). I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism
as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious
allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of
untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste
movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and
should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste
or profession.
I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins,
27k Like Like

34
Planting Pot
alibaba.com
Supplies Made to Order from World's Largest Supplier Base. Top Deals!
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
168K 539 15 Share 195 169K
Translate
2 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the
company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai
Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/india/) and some prominent countries like England , France ,
America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied
very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two
ideologies have contributed more to the molding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the
last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.
All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as
a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty
crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/india/) , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me
naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to
believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her
to render true service to humanity as well.
Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhijis influence in the Congress
first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their
intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/india/was-gandhis-non-violence-really-true/) which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No
sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in
them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you
imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty
principles in its normal life from day to day.
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads
/2014/02/Jinnah_Gandhi.jpg)In fact, honour, duty and love
of ones own kith and kin and country might often compel
us to disregard non-violence
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/india/was-gandhis-
non-violence-really-true/) and to use force. I could never
conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is
unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to
resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by
use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a
tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness;
and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered
Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama,
Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of
human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
3 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower
and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning historys
towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has
merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought
untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the
Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to
them.
The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded
me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/?s=gandhi&
x=0&y=0) should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold
the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he
developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or
wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand
aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02
/hqdefault.jpg)Against such an attitude there can be no halfway
house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to
be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity,
whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry
on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every
thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience
movement; no other could know the technique of that movement.
He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The
movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make
no difference to the Mahatmas infallibility. A Satyagrahi can never fail was his formula for declaring his
own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the
judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe
austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.
Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or
place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility
Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhis
pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It
is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the
beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims
did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is
no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken,
but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the
Mahatmas sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that
Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/
$
(
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
)
http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
4 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to
be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.
From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a
massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what
was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935
to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to
Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in
September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception,
but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they
were a part, the greater was Gandhis infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign
as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord
Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted
of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the
bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the
Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.
Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy
and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over
power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave
us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved
after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls
freedom and peaceful transfer of power. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally
burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd
and they have called freedom won by them with sacrifice whose sacrifice? When
top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country
which we consider a deity of worship my mind was filled with direful anger.
One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death
related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in
Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and
censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that
while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in
Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast
had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the
Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by
his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/3312431-9935.jpg)Gandhi is being
referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he
has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that
Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual
power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnahs iron
will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined,
and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all
my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the
Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be
powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
5 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may
even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or
foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the
course founded on the reason which I consider to be
necessary for sound nation-building.
After having fully considered the question, I took the
final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it
to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my
hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th
January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.
I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and
destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be
brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually
but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly
favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due
to the presence of Gandhi.
I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are
at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of
season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the
theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhis persistent policy of appeasement
towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I
have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be
considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish
that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action
has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest
writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.
Also Check - The Little Known Dark Side of Gandhi (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/india/the-little-known-dark-side-of-gandhi/)
0ou ma7 also like:
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/histor7/secret-indian-
arm7-o8-hitler/-
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
6 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
7 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
0"9 :$0 $L(" L%2)

/indian-religions
/sikhism/hind-
ki-chadar-
the-shielder-
of-the-hindus/)
HIND KI
CHADAR The
Shielder of the
Hindus
/indian-religions
/sikhism/hind-
ki-chadar-
the-shielder-
of-the-hindus/)
/india/the-clay-
image-history-
of-indias-
clay-deities/)
The Clay Image
History of
Indias Clay
Deities
/india/the-clay-
image-history-
of-indias-
clay-deities/)
/india
/was-gandhis-
non-violence-
really-true/)
Was Gandhis
Non-Violence
Really True ?
/india
/was-gandhis-
non-violence-
really-true/)
/india/hey-are-
you-indian/)
Hey! Are You
Indian?!!
/india/hey-are-
you-indian/)
/history/reality-
of-aurangzeb-
the-tyrant/)
Reality of
Aurangzeb, The
Tyrant
/history/reality-
of-aurangzeb-
the-tyrant/)
/india/relevance-
of-sanskrit-
in-the-
modern-age/)
Relevance of
Sanskrit in the
Modern Age
/india/relevance-
of-sanskrit-
in-the-
modern-age/)
/india/more-
to-indian-
food-than-curry-
spices/)
More to Indian
Food than Curry
& Spices
/india/more-
to-indian-
food-than-curry-
spices/)
/india/hindu-
is-a-coward/)
Hindu is a
Coward
/india/hindu-
is-a-coward/)
/history/gandhis-
principle-peace-
bogus/)
Gandhis
Principle of
Peace Was
Bogus: Gopal
Godse
/history/gandhis-
principle-peace-
bogus/)
/india/a-brief-
history-
of-reservations-
in-india/)
A Brief History of
Reservations in
India
/india/a-brief-
history-
of-reservations-
in-india/)
/history/qutub-
minar-or-dhurva-
stambha/)
Qutub Minar or
Dhurva Stambha
/history/qutub-
minar-or-dhurva-
stambha/)
/india/wake-
up-india-before-
it-is-too-late/)
Wake up India,
before it is too
late
/india/wake-
up-india-before-
it-is-too-late/)
/india/who-do-
we-actually-
owe-our-
freedom-to/)
Who Do We
Actually Owe
Our Freedom
To?
/india/who-do-
/india/kalka-
shimla-railway-
line/)
Kalka Shimla
Railway Line
/india/kalka-
shimla-railway-
line/)
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
8 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
;; #esponses to <.h7 % 2illed &andhi<
Pingback: The Little Known Dark Side of Gandhi | Sanskriti - Culture of India (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/india/the-little-known-dark-side-of-gandhi/)
Pingback: Gandhis Killer speaks about why he did what he di | Global Eyes Magazine
(http://gemwinnipeg.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/gandhis-killer-speaks-about-why-he-did-what-he-di/)
27k Like Like

34
Asish Keshri
True!
_ February 9, 2014 at 3:38 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/?replytocom=616#respond)
Sampro
Certainly the tall claims of India only for Hindus makes me think, whether ever Godse
thought of an egalitarian society about which he says he strived hard. I too would have
been happy if the Indian sub-continent was 1 nation. See the fruits the seed of Indias
division has reaped. Year after year riots and outrage hatred against each other in all the
countries of this sub-continent. But nevertheless the hope still stays alive. I want to see an
egalitarian society.
_ February 10, 2014 at 7:56 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Sheila
Godse was bang-on in his thoughts. Mohanlal Gandhi started acting like Mahatma.
Demanding people treat him like one and thats what happened. Which is why, Nehru and
not Vallabh bhai Patel became the PM. However, killing him didnt solve anything. I respect
Gandhi for getting us to a place where he is today, but Godse is right in his own right.
_ February 12, 2014 at 10:09 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
i!u
Its Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.. and not Mohanlal. Mohanlal is a Kerala Film
Star. Killing someone, whatever your reasons might be is not correct. If you
cannot give life, you dont have the right to take one. Also, Godse was
completely illogical in his thoughts One cannot discount the fact that he was a
staunch supporter of Hinduism and ny other religion was unacceptable to him..
Just like Jinnah wanted a Muslim state, he wanted a Hindu state. No difference
there. I wont say that MK Gandhi was the Father of the Nation or Mahatma
he was also selfish in his deeds He was the prime factor responsible for the
division of India However, in effect, it was a right decision. A gangrenous
foot, a cancerous organ needs to be removed to preserve the body. The
gangrene that is Pak was removed.although in mistake. So Godse can rant
all he want Killing someone is not right. even if that person has committed
genocide. there has to be a trial and teh courts will decide thats what
democracies are for else we descend into anarchy
_ "ay 9, 2014 at 4:45 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
168K
539
15 Share
195
169K
Translate
9 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
#i#e$ Si%&h 're(al
The article is welcome as it brings forward a different aspect of an important historic event
and healthy discussions from all sides is welcome. But I have seen people buying this
above rhetoric and am compelled to comment on the fundamentally wrong underlying
assumptions that Godse here makes:
* That India, the then geographical identity is only for Hindus. Think for a second, does a
Muslim child whose family has lived in U.P. for more than 30 generations not intrinsically
belong to U.P. or India?
*That allaying the fears of minorities always amounts to appeasement. We need to
remember the basic responsibility of the majority community -in democratic polity- to allay
the fears arising from possibility of majoritarian rule and exclusion. Think of being in a part
of closed home of 10 people of which 2 are of a different (supposedly clashing) ideology.
The fear of the 2 in minority -of being overpowered- would be immense. If one of the 8 here
(=Gandhi) talks of listening to the 2 he must not be branded a appeaser rather a sympatiser.
* Godse lays the blame of partition blatantly on congress and Gandhi. Sure they did allow
it to happen in the end but the rot that had already been set in, firstly by the divide and rule
policy over decades and later capitalised upon by an opportuinistic section of muslim elites,
has not been emphasised enough and the situational blame has been assumed to be
completely on congress. Though arguably some other options could have been take by
congress.
* That overzealous nationality -bordering on jingoism- based on religion or race can be a
virtue. Veneration of the nation without adequate degree of moderation by a humanistic
worldview would actually make the world all but a battleground as was the case in the world
wars.
* And most importantly he assumes that offensive use of violence can be justified,
especially in the modern world, that too by citing the barbaric medieval and mythological
times in the name of patriots who fought in a different context.
Personally I feel Gandhi had often tried to keep aloof of influencing too much when some of
his ideological preferences were too far off. For instance resigning from congress over the
issue of council entry in 1934. He had also refused to formally join the servants of india
society in 1915 on realising that his ideology is different and it would be wrong to imose it
on others. One must look into his lucid writings for a peek into his decision making process
over such matters. That he did this to gain traction over congress decision making can only
be said to be out of place from his overall personality.
Conversely the blame of imposition of ones eccentric ideology onto the world around
oneself can be put on Godse himself for more than anything else in taking such an extreme
decision of committing murder admittedly speaking to noone whatsoever.
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
S)* +ompa%y ,SA
I am sure your name is not what you have written. Any sensible Indian except for
the fanatic radicals cannot come upto this conclusion that you have drawn. Your
days of appeasement are over. Its our nation, our culture, our history. From
Kashmir to Kanyakumari, we have called upon our own demise by being
submissive tolerant to such barbaric savages. Not anymore, India has to know
akbar Babar and all their line of savages were tyrant cunts. India has to know
about Bose Godse and the true colors of Gandhi.
Har Har Mahadev
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 6:51 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
10 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Aru%ima
Mr/Ms SEO Company USA, whatever is being talked of is history, and
history is important to learn lessons- the right lessons. Imagine a life
where the religion, caste, creed etc of the person does not concern
you life in such a world would be so simple. From these articles, i
believe one should not concentrate on the endless debate of whether
Gandhi was was a mahatma or a devil in disguise or whether godse was
a criminal or an angel in disguise. we are not gaining anything from
this debate- both are dead. i believe the important lesson her is to rise
above these divisive forces of nation, religion, language etc and
recognise and respect each person for what they inherently are- a
human being.. why cant people accept the greatness of every culture,
language and religion??? who gives anybody the right to demean the
other persons social identity and declare your own as supreme? Both
concentrated on divisive forces- in different ways- but none tried to
dissolve them none tried to create a nation where all this are just
mere labels but not THE most important thing Godse accuses Gandhi
of promoting Hindustani but tell me one thing, what about the rest of
the indian population who do not speak Hindi??? yes- Hindi is an
OFFICIAL language- which is enough for the purpose of integrated
communication. what is the requirement of a national language when no
language is one that is spoken by the majority?? We boast of Unity in
diversity but we make every effort to wipe out diversity the only
lesson to be learnt here is that Diversity is beautiful. the other thing i
want to point out is the nature of revenge. yes, we can punish those
PARTICULAR individuals who might have murdered/ raped the victims
but you cannot blame the entire RELIGION for that i hope you will
agree with me.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 2:56 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
a!ay
Dear,
A nation which forgets its History is doomed to Repeat it.
I was also thinking like u,but i have changed my notion.If u
check History u will find out Hinduisim is not a predator
Religion so u can expect all others to live peacefully side by
side..yes we cant blame the entire Religion but if u check the
History u will have to Blame them.check what is the fate of
Red indians in US, Aborginals in Australia,Moaris in Newzeland
they r all silently wiped out by the saviors of Democracy.The
other culture silently poppulating to compete with the western
culture.All the problems in the world for the past 2000 yrs r
bcse of these two culture which want to show their God is
Great.our culture questions their very foundation of their belief
&
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 5:58 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
-riyesh -a.hori
Sir I will comment on your post in order of the comments that you have made.
1. Sure if a persons family has been living in the country for the past 30 centuries
then that person irrespective of cast, religion, colour, etc. belongs to India and
has equal rights to any other citizen Hindu or otherwise. But the keyword here is
EQUAL rights and not favouritism or bias. Gandhiji continuously showed bias
towards the Muslim community ONLY. So it became a matter of favouritism. Had
he done the same towards all other minorities it would not have been an issue.
And on top of all this Muslims did not reciprocate in kind.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 1:17 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
11 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
2. There is a difference between being an appeaser and being sympathetic. Dr.
B.R. Ambedkar was sympathetic towards backward communities in general and
that is why he introduced the reservation system for the period of 10 years to
help them grow. Where as Gandhiji only cared about appeasing the Muslims and
this shows time and again by the actions he took.
3. Any major decision for the government is taken by the leaders of the country.
Hence the division of the country was done after the consent of the leaders at
time. Also, Muslim League led by Jinnah wanted the partition and not anyone else.
This goes on to show how weak our leaders were that they could not prevent the
partition of the country, especially Gandhiji who was revered as the father of the
nation.
4. The point being made here by Godse is not about nationality. It is about the
ways of Gandhiji showing unwanted and unreciprocated favours towards the
Muslim community. And if you take a moment to read about Godse you will come
to understand that he was not into jingoism. He was the member of RSS which
served the people irrespective of their religion.
5. As far as the issue of violence goes, let me tell you what he means by that.
Suppose you are in your house and some random person walks in and gives you
two slaps across your face. Will you simply smile at him and let it go? Though a
follower of non-violence you might be, at the very least you will ask that person
ANGRILY the reasons for slapping you. In those days it was the same situation.
The Britishers harassed us, bullied us, looted us, killed us in our own country.
Then the muslims raped, plundered, killed the hindus during partition and the many
riots that took place. If after all this you think that using violence offensively to
protect ones family, sanity, possessions, simply to protect oneself as a human
being, is wrong then I think you need to grow a pair of balls.
Though Gandhiji has done some amazing things for the country but his decisions
have led to severe loss of life, money, efforts and resources and no matter how
great a human being he might have been the losses caused due to his decisions
cannot be justified. The article presented above is just an excerpt. I suggest you
read this book called Murder of the Mahtma written by G.D. Khosla to get a full
understanding of the facts. Here is an example for you. I am sure that you know
about the Jalliawalabag massacre. It was peaceful gathering of sikhs in protest of
the arresting two of their leaders. There were children, women, aged, in the
gathering. 1152 rounds were fired, 900 people were killed without any provocation
from there side and all Gandhiji did was start the Non-Cooperation Movement. You
what message this gives. This says that you can kill anyone you want in this
country and all this country will do is protest in a non-violent manner. So britishers
kill thousands and all we do is not buy there goods. Admirable indeed.
Good Day.
"ohi%/ar +ho(/ay "oparthi
Hats off to you sir Godse.. You are one of the real sons this mother india has ever had
We need more number of godses in the current situation our country is in
Jai Hind, Hari OM
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
bali
Pardon my emotional outburst here but I know we all have our beliefs and
opinions. Exactly like our religion or tatva called hinduism. no one clearly
understand it and explain in a simple way. We say its complex. Not easy. But it is
easy to bash Gandhi and do hats off to Godse. Its easy to tolerate age old
corruption at all levels destroying India and we dont fight it. But we do hats off on
facebook or march with candles on street. How is this different from what Gandhi
did ( Ahimsa ?) or restraint to fight . Infact when we did not have an army that
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 6:32 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
12 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
could challenge British,Gandhi smartly made nonviolence as strategy and made
everyone a soldier. When we were struggling to achieve unity historically, Gandhi
added Muslims to the freedom fight by not treating them like minority. But after
independence, we did not need ahimsa. where is the fighting spirit of Shivaji,
Bose and of the so called Hari Om walas? Shame you for you have not stood up (
not even 60% voting in top cities to fight for the right government in the recent
elections) . The so called RSS and shiv sena are counting how to get modi? We
have failed as a nation which had the precious world leading foundation. But yes!
we salute Godse every now and then..and call the AAP leader a fool. Arent we
a bunch of hypocrites? This is not to support Gandhi but to only question ones
right to question Gandhis deeds
-ra%a(a 0a%/
Gandhi Ji is political leader in 20th century same as current leader we have. He was never
a social reformer nor a patriotic fighter. Who knew very well how to play with words and
express your thought to innocence people. There are few points which remain unanswered.
A) He is known for Non-violence. What was his mean of Do or Die. What to do, how to do
or How to die, why to die
B) He is so called father of nation. How he can be become father of nation ? He belongs to
nation, nation cant belongs to only single individual (Gandhi ji) . No individual or society or
religion can be above nation. But he became father of nation. Nation was before him, after
him and so on . If it is not so, which nation fought against British Kingdom in 1857.
C) His early age of 25 yrs, He has no problem with british tortured and rule in india. The
same age Bhagat Singh / Subhas Chandra / Chandasekhar Azaad / Veersavarkar / Sukhdev
/ Rajguru / Vismilaakhan had been participated freedom fighting against British. And he was
planning to go for further studies in South Africa. When he thrown out from the train in south
Africa then only he realize to stand against british.
D) If he is mahatma or priest or leader of nation. He should not had been blamed to favor
for any religion by religious communities. But he blamed by communities bacon his action
was different what he wrote or said or promise to innocence people (of any communities).
After partition he committed certain things to Pakistan and India . Neither he tried to full fill
commitment to Pakistan nor India.
How A Good father divide and vivisect his son in two parts. If he did so he has failed to
perform his responsibility as father. He has no right to called for father by son. He must
accept his duty which failed to perform towards his son. He never talked or write or express
about it.
A real Mahatma or Priest or Leader cant belongs to any religion / communities / Nation.
These are belong to all human and communities
As same todays any invention or scientist belongs to globe. It may be pride for nation /
Communities but his invention for all humanities across the globe.
There is One Earth-One nation, There is One religion-which teach, guide and help all human
to achieve height of happiness and prosperous across the globe and universe. If differ from
this it would be opinion, persuasion not religion.
I am not denying his role in fight for freedom. He fought his own way and had right to fight
his way but he misguided to innocence people of nation until his death.
We forgot few freedom fighters and their role for freedom, which are unknown to new
generation. Whose are never recognized and claimed or blown their own triumph (there is
saying self praise has no recommendation)
_ February 13, 2014 at 12:23 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
13 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
That time humanities are tortured by British tyranny across the world. Every countries want
to overcome. Across globe stood against British tyranny and came together. Gandhi was
only fighting against British in India with hunger strike.
Few example presents Indias contribution against British across the globe.
A) Sham jib krishna verma-who fought against British tyranny in London and globally. He
visited France, Germany Established (Please check Wikipedia) India house in London to
find out patriot person who can fight with British Tyranny Veer savarkar one of them who got
scholar of India house and published against british tortured .That point of time Gandhi was
studying in India and planning to go south Africa for further studies.
B) Veer Swanker- British Tyranny was so afraid about his writing blog against them in
newspaper across the globe. Appointed a committee and followed his daily writing.
Savarkar left London and caught by British and put behind bar for two times life
presentment-no person in this world got punishment before and after him. this was against
British law as well. (His punishment was challenged in international court Hedge)
C) Sub has Chandra Bose-He is one of freedom fighter who participated freedom fighting in
India and out of India. There are so many.. (Please refer book written by Man math Nath
Gupta (Friend of Chandra Sekhar Azad who died age of 92 yrs in 2000 book name-History
of the Indian revolutionary movement).
1uma%
The first question that I would like to ask is what is the purpose of religion? Fight??!!!
Why is that from time immemorial the religious minority is so heavily persecuted that they
feel the need to be a separate state or community?! All religions preach the existence of
ONE GOD. If you believe people who are not of your religion have been created by a
different God.thats the utmost sin you can do.by NOT believing in the existence of one
supreme God who created mankind. Different religions are just various manifestations of
the same God.
We are humans first and for people who believe in God.created by ONE God. And our
first duty towards each other has to be of brotherhood. How pointless is the fight in the
name of religion!
_ February 14, 2014 at 10:29 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
roha%
Of the three countries created from pre independence India, Pakistan is perhaps the least
tolernat and India is the most tolerant country towards various communities. Guess, which
country is a constant battle ground, dictatorships with little freedom or security of life &
worse living standards? And which country has a working democracy, a disciplined army
and far more freedom. India is hardly perfact, but compare it with its neighbour. Thank god,
India did not follow the message preached in this speech.
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Ashalata 2hosar
Nathuram Godase is right in his own right
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
3aya/e# -
1. Sikhs getting slaughtered in thousand = A MISTAKE.
2. Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem.
3. Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust.
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
14 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Pingback: Giordano Bruno and Lord Kelvin | unGuide (http://unguide.org/2014/03/07/giordano-bruno-and-lord-
kelvin/)
4. Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.
5. Talking about Hindus and Hinduism = Communal.
6. Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.
7. Kargil Attack = Government failure.
8. Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.
9. Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular.
10. Reservations in Minority institutions =Communal.
11. Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism.
12. Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.
13. Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal.
14. Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.
15. BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful.
16.Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one Daughter of its minister in Kashmir
[Rubina Sayed]
Political dilemma = Natural Dilemma
17.Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude.
18. Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity and
Political dilemma.
19. BJP questioning Islamic Terrorist Forces = Communal.
20. Congress questioning Lord Ram existence = Clerical Error.
killed-
gandhi
-riyesh -a.hori
Well said Sir, well said indeed.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 1:21 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
su/hir 4http:55te.h4more6.om7
Really this was an eye opening article. After reading some facts behind this decision, I
think, Nathuram Godse was right. He done it to save our country..
_ "ar.h 7, 2014 at 11:04 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
8i!ay
It is very unfortunate for someone to justify the action of a sick murderer. If one believes
Godses reasoning then be ready to believe every murderers reasoning because everyone
has a reason. Contrarian view in this case is okay for an argument but will never live the
test of time or human value. Gandhi was a leading light not just for India but the whole world.
His core value of nonviolence is the only reason we are the worlds largest and disciplined
democracy.
Every persons action can be interpret as right or wrong depending from where you see it,
but to view Gandhis action on India, Pakistan separation from Godse and RSSs point of
_ "ar.h 7, 2014 at 8:23 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
15 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
view is unjustifiable.
"aya%$
mind that Murder for a Brahmin Pandit is next to denying presence of god.
But he did it not for his sake but for our future.
I am pretty sure that if Mahatma Gandhi lived few more years
India couldnt be as stable as it is today.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 8:25 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
3itu
Non-violence has only made us cowards or may be we support non-violence
because we do not have guts to fight for the justice and truth.We are worlds
largest country because of Muslim appeasement ,we gave away our land as
Bangladesh but getting their burden of 30 million muslims to live in our land.In
Pakistan they killed and converted most of the Hindus whereas here in India for
vote bank poltics we allow them to grow through un limited procreations to finish
our resources though 98% of those had voted for Pakistan in pre-partition
referendum .Are we at all a disciplinesd Democracy!!! Thanks for a good Joke. My
name is Jitu and I am not a member of RSS.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 10:16 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
-riyesh -a.hori
Well what you say is surely correct, but I Godse was not a retard who murdered
Gandhiji for kicks. He knew full well what he was getting into and knew very well
what will the consequences be. He was very well educated, was a writer by
profession before he joined the freedom struggle. I suggest that you read this
book called Murder of the Mahtma written by G.D. Khosla before labelling Godse
as a murderer. Just a heads up, it is very difficult to find this book at any
respectable book store these days because congree has banned the publishing
and retailing of this book. So you will have to search for it. Its a small book around
80 pages or so. I am sure your opinion will change once you go through this book.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 1:27 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
)brahim
Godse over a period of time built up a hatred toward Gandhi I presume mainly due to the
unsatisfactory results of Gandhis methods. Godse decided to focus his anger toward
Gandhi eventually which led to the killing but in hindsight the killing seems to have achieved
nothing, did any of the problems get resolved? that is what its all about right.. finding
solution.. making things better..
Ofcourse the only reason I can say that things havent improved is because I have the
benefit of witnessing all the years after the killing and realising that most of those problems
still persist today. Im not sure if Godse thought the solution to all the problem was killing
Gandhi but if it was he was not correct.
The point is Godse possibly could not know all the consequences of his actions but we as
observers of history do know the consequences, did the killing make things better? I think
you know the answer to that..
_ "ar.h 16, 2014 at 7:39 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
16 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
3itu
Godse was late because of his confusion perhaps, India would have been a
better place if it had happened before his fasting drama at Calcutta.,at least we
wouldnt have any pretensions to be secular sic anti-Hindu.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 10:21 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
A%/re(
After 200 years of slavery and those fights which had brought nothing more other maybe kill
a thousand more, and killing that man cause he didnt think right for both the parties!! You
gotta be nothing more than simply insane! Its preposterous! Dealing with these wicked
people around him is no easy task! How about killing Jinnah itself ! Oh thats right he cant!
_ "ar.h 24, 2014 at 2:58 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
haira# sheth
Godse was like RAJ THAKEREY of those days,Read about his history.
At least Raj Thakerey does not murder people from UP/Bihar he just injures them.
Godse was just for Hindus and by this logic there would be many countries in india ,
Because Hindu is not just 1 religion there are manyHindus like kathyawadi
hindus,kannadiga hindus,maratha hindus,konkani hindus,etc
Then everyone will justify killing people from other regions because they dont belong to
them.
_ April 15, 2014 at 1:38 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
rata% /as
The Article is eye opener indeed for those who are ignorant of facts or mesmerised by
Gandhi/Nehru concept of pseudo-secularism which clearly was & sadly still is appeasement
with Muslims thus sacrifice Hindus. Gandhi was clever enough to hide this from world
opinion at a time when Brits was desperate to leave India for all kinds of reason including
International / American pressure.
Godse clearly was a true nationalist and a Patriot that Gandhi / Nehru could not tolerate.
There was a place for such millions of patriots during that era.
_ "ay 3, 2014 at 9:11 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Se.ular 1uma%ist
Does me being a parsi or a christian or a buddhist or a sikh make me any less indian? Its
amazing how these extremists keep going on about their own faction like they own this
country. I share the same blood as every Indian in this country, i might not be Hindu, but can
we really say this country belongs to just the hindus in India? We can keep going on and
then finally arrive at saying this country belongs to the neanderthals and the pagans that
lived here 1000s of years ago. How can there be all this talk of religion in politics. The 42nd
amendment! Secularism! Wished we practiced it in this country, the greatest gift India was
ever given, that and Indias diplomatic stand on global issues. Too much talk of religion in
the political arena, it should be banned because it makes no sense in a secular country.
Religion is a sensitive issue and has no place. None at all in politics! If you ask me, nation
over religion!
_ "ay 4, 2014 at 3:06 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
3itu
In India secular means anti-hinduism and appeasement of Muslims for Political
gain.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 10:26 am
Reply
(/india
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
17 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Ka%%a% S
was wondering if any of Gandhis direct family members got affected by this riots or
non-hindus, what will be Gandhis stand? still the same?
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 6:15 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
1ari
Everybody has a right to follow ones will, the problem is when one tries to impose it on
another. It was a pity that a learned man like Godse though that one could be born a Hindu
and killing of Gandhi would have solved the problem. The rot had already started when
Karna was called one of a lower stature in Mahabharata and when Ravan was called an
Asura inspite of being a bramhin by birth and deeds, however Ram being called a God
inspite of all his shortfalls. The pity is, the nation is made to believe that Gandhi and
Congress was the root causes of all failures and Godse and Hinduism the solution of all
evils.
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 8:25 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
1arsha
Now I know why my dad used to hate Gandi and Nehru. Thanks for an enlightening article.
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 8:35 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
0eethi 4http:55%eethisoli.itors9&mail6.om7
Its not because of Gandhi we got Freedom in 1947, The real History is different. it was
because of USA we were given freedom by the British. The Atlantic Charter was the
Reason for our Freedom. Can any body remember from when Gandhi asked for Indian
independence? when u do research on this, the real History will be seen
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 1:19 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
A!ay
The real Reason for us to get freedom.
There r many Reason.
The Great Indian Navy Revolt ( Rss influence of Sikhs & Jats )
2nd world War ( weakened the British empire )
mutual understanding by the Christian Nations to Omit colonisation & replace it
with another secular form of controlling their economy.
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 6:29 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
shri$a%th6$ara%9&mail6.om 4http:55shri$a%th6$ara%9&mail6.om7
Godse did the right thing,I have also read other articles related to this,where one of the
main reason for killing him is ,he did not stop the punishment of our heroes,Bhagat
singh,Sukh dev,Rajguru.And also many hindu were killed and our sisters and mothers were
being raped in pakistan,but this gandhi did not looked at them,the other imp thing was,when
hindus were being sent to India from pakistan,gandhi told them to go back to pakistan as
now they belong to that country,but in reality there were wars in between hindu and muslim
in pakistan.
_ "ay 5, 2014 at 1:25 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Sarha%:y
I am surprised at the people proud of Godses action of killing Gandhi, and his
fundementalist ideologies. Its pretty sad that there are people out there as can be seen in
the comments who believe that religion is the makeup of Indian civilsation. Does someone
not Hindu in India not deserve to be Indian, who are you or for the matter Godse to decide
this pretty idiotic idealogy.
_ "ay 6, 2014 at 1:00 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
18 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Relegion should never overshadow or decide politics or a common Indian. I can see how
easily the gullible can be swayed to religious extremism and reading this justification and
the fact that he couldnt even reason with Gandhi through dialogue but through violence.
India as a country should have open minded people, and, not people such as some of the
ones posting here, who are closed minded fundementalists, it is only then that India will
progress. How can a country progress when people hate each other in the name of the
religion to the extent that they think its justified that the father of the nation was killed by a
fundementalist.
I would like to conclude this ever so long statement by saying to the people with such
ideologies, take your mind out of the gutter, religious intolerance serves no benefit. Lets
work together to be better human beings and build a better tomorrow.
3a&a/ish
You said no different that what we have been doing since the muslim invasion.
You welcome everyone.. they come and screw you up. We are being tolerant and
secular. Are you saying that we as a country are happy now?.. Who is
perpetrating terrorist acts not only in India, but in the entire world?.
Godses statement was for people like you. Only those who cannot fight real war,
talk about peace.
_ "ay 9, 2014 at 3:14 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
"u$u%/ha% ;a/ha$rish%a%
many movements started by gandhi were self controled. no one else had a chance of
participating in decision making. what kind of sense does it make.its not his personal
intrest.its actually for the country.its not like when ever he needs to start a movement he
can and stop wen he wish.he was just better of many in those days who can speak well and
only that made him look better. pepole were desparate .they were in need of freedom and
gandhi convinced them better in getting freedom.just for few reasons like this calling a
person father of nation is a kind of exagerating one leaving others behind, who had bettre
hand in the struggle.Godse was a good obsever cum good decision maker,who had guts to
come forward to assassin a person like this for well being of the same society were he
lived.
_ "ay 6, 2014 at 4:06 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
piyush
Ghandi was the worst thing to happen to india, second was nehru, if these two criminals
were never born, India would be in a much better place today without division and fully
united.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 6:00 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Sati
Who broke the Gandhi Tatva ??
Gandhi himself broke the Gandhi tatva by Making Chutiya Nehru as first Prime Minster of
Hindustan instead of Sardar Patel .
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 12:23 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
19 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
<e#a%&
Nathuram was so full of crap, also he did not state what did he gain by killing Gandhi, his
action was without any cause at least so called terrorist have a cause. He was a psycho
and his own mind killed him and Gandhi. no one should share this and make more psycho.
_ "ay 7, 2014 at 2:36 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
#siyer
sector4
charkop
really an eye opener. Godse, would have been pardoned why appreciated today , if
happened today.
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 3:43 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
$hap&o/e
its seems to be some mental issues with godse. killer is killer. he cannot justify his
imaginative theories to kill father of nation.
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 5:59 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
1iral
Though i think that Ghodse may not be totally right in his approach towards muslims it is
the religions that led to the divide and that had our so called father of the nation tried, we
could have very well been India minus terrorism and without kashmir disputes, without riots
and a bigger sub-continent. By secretly consenting to partition, no one gained. We lost our
fellow citizens and territories, they lost kashmir and in the end a lot of lives were lost and
are still being lost. Undivided India could have been achieved, but Gandhi, for whom his
predicament would be final, could not be retraced. He built a wall and it became a border.
No one gained!
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 7:31 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Kesha#
Whats wrong in our mentality is that we think gandhi resorted to non-violence because he
was a coward. The true fact is that he was prudential. He knew that the British were an
imperialistic force whove fought battles since the birth of their nation and have won each of
them and India had no chance of winning a violent battle against the british. Talking of
approach through violence, what fruit did revolt of 1857 bear apart from stricter laws and
increased armed whites in the country?Talking of heeding to M.A Jinnahs demands, it was
a very small price we paid. And as it is even if this partition wouldnt have happened, the
hindus and the current pakistani muslims(As they chose to move out) would still remain
segregated and it would be forceful to keep them together leading in even more violence.
As it is weve got enough to say euphemistically, diversity with 28 states and I dont think we
could want more of this Diversity with another few states. Land acquisation brings no
peace and is no sign of prestige of which the soviet russia is or was I dont know what to
say a great example. Things could have beem a lot more worse as very few people in India-
Pakistan understand the we are humans before being hindus or muslims and humanity by
itself is a religion and those who do not preach this religion are scientifically called
psycopaths
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 5:03 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
a%umathy
Because of partition only chain of great bad events took place. If there was no partition ,
there wont be these countries Pakistan, Bangladesh. they would be part of India. No Indo
china war, no kargil war.ni Kashmir problem We would not have allowed the Chinese to take
over a part of Arunachal Pradesh. would not have allowed other countries to interfere in our
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 5:08 pm
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
20 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
internal problems. there wont be any religious enmity amongst us. So who are all part to this
partition, should be let known to our future generation. To satisfy Jinnah who wanted to be a
ruler , this partition took place.
killed-
gandhi
"K'
In my personal view, Ghodse was a fanatic Hindu! I will tell you a story and let you guys be
judge of what is right and what is wrong. For a moment, lets forget about Gandhi or Godse
and lets just concentrate on the below story.
Once upon a time there was a man named Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, he lived in a
small house. He had 2 sons and their names were Hindu and Muslim. They were all living
happily together until one day; a group of thieves attacked their house. Gandhi along with
his 2 sons struggled to defend his house and after continuous struggle, they managed to
drive the thieves away. Gandhi was very proud of his 2 children, the way they came
together to get rid of their common enemy.
As in any other house in India, few days later, his son Muslim came to Gandhi and said that
his family is growing now and he needs his part of the house. Gandhi tried to convince him
that it is better to stick together because if the thieves will attack again then they can
defend the house again as a bigger force however Muslim was not ready to listen. Few
days later, even Hindu came with the same demand of his share of the house. Gandhi was
heart-broken but he decided not to divide the house and thought that after sometime they
will forget it and will stay together again as brothers. However, as the time passed the
conflict among Hindu and Muslim started to aggravate.
Gandhi did not know how to divide the house since Hindu had a bigger family than Muslim
and since both were his children he wanted to do justice to both. He was in big dilemma and
hoped that his 2 sons will reconcile someday. Hindu and Muslim both were unpleased with
their father that he is not making a decision, so they decided to divide the house within
themselves. Since, Hindu had a bigger family so he took the major share of the house and
gave the rest Muslim.
When Gandhi came to know about it, he was heart-broken. He realized that Muslim got the
less share of the house and like any other father he wanted to make sure that Muslim is
able to support itself and his family. So, he decides to take some money from Hindu and
give it to his Muslim son. In the meantime his Hindu son came to know about it and got
really furious and in the fit of rage he decided to kill his father.
Gandhi as usual was getting ready for the temple to offer his morning prayers, his Hindu
son came up to him, touched his feet, took out his pistol and shot his 79 years old father in
his chest. Gandhi looked at his son, smiled, said Hey Ram and died on the spot!
His son Hindu pleads guilty and gives the justification of injustice for killing his 79 year old
father.
Will you as Jury or as a human being pardon him???
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 6:45 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
Aaro%
HOLY CRAP!!! Talk about being delusional moron its funny how you created this
imaginary fable to justify your idea of gandhi being all good and all holy and
whoever stood against his stupidity was evil.
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 7:19 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
3a&a/iesh
Thank you for a very funny story!!!! It started with a big illusion that have been
set firmly in the minds of many Hindus including some who posted here..
/*There were all living happily together*/
Really?.. The so-called muslim brother invaded from outside. Because this
Hindu brother is always accommodative as his culture says Vasudaiva
_ "ay 9, 2014 at 3:06 am
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
21 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Kutumbam and accepts all faiths as true unlike these fanatic religions, was kind
enough to give shelter to the other brother. Mind you, we always heard about
Muslim Kings killing/converting Hindus and destroying their temples in spite of their
minority, you never heard about Hindus being in majority resorting to such acts in
the historyI know you will bring up 1992 and Modi which is two-way violence
anyway, but I am talking about history. That was the tolerance of the HIndu
brother.
To extend your story, a group of theives was Muslims coming to India It was
only a matter of time. British came in 16th Century where as Muslims came in
11th century If Muslims can claim themselves as brothers, then they cannot say
British as thieves
So, the muslim brother simply took the advantage of so called group of thieves to
steal a major portion of the house because he himself is a thief..
Gandhi being a coward, allowed it in the name of non-violence. In fact what
Godse feared is happening now. The same pseudo secular policy is inherited by
his followers now.
If you tell the right story, then people will be able to judge if it is right or wrong. A
cock-and-bull story will only make them to decide between chicken sh1t or bull
sh1t and the sh1t alwys floats and shows up..
SK
Some people have really warped ideology when it comes to the killing of bapuji the one
man who practically ripped India apart and caused immense atrocities and butchering in the
name of secularism. The guy was a lunatic who knew how to play mind games a sick man
who knew how to manipulate the crowd, especially at a time when most Indians were not
allowed to be educated by the British.
You are crying about one man being killed but what about what about all those massacred
before and after the partition? Ok, never mind that how about today when countries like
US and its allies send their troops into whichever country they choose to bully and control
people in the name of war against terrorism. I dont see anyone crying about that. How
about when people are murdered in Muslim countries to appease their Sharia laws, girls
kidnapped, raped and murdered.
Heres a few things that are wrong with Gandhi:
- slept naked with young women, including his niece to test his manhood.
- had an affair with a British guy and abused his own wife for him, wrote several letters to
him that were just bought by the Indian government to hide his fallacies.
- called freedom fighters terrorists, happy that people like Bhagat Singh were put to death
- Dr. Ambedkar once said: A person who cheats and keeps other people in dark, if you call
such person a Mahatma, then Gandhi is a Mahatma
- racist against the South African Blacks, was happy they were treated like animals by the
Whites
- ostracized people like Netaji, Sardar Patel and many other freedom fighters who gave up
far more than this guy who had both his arms hanging around young women.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Tell me if someone today asks you to let your daughter and wives be raped and that you
should just die off of the greater good, WOULD YOU DO IT?? So instead of ranting and
crying over a useless man who sadly died a very swift death when countless others
suffered GET REAL instead of blaming Hindu fanatics or RSS or any other tooth fairy that
you can think of!
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 7:40 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
22 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Lea=e a #epl7
Your email address will not be published.
.alebsi%&h
Whatever one would say about partition and its horrors,the split of pre independent India
was good for it future,otherwise modern India would have ungovernable,it would be like
Bosnia, nigeria torn apart by religious insurgency and ethnic cleansing and countless
millions would continue to die
_ "ay 8, 2014 at 11:47 pm
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
3a&a/ish 4http:55yahoo6.om7
This is the first time I am seeing the perspective of Godse and I cant help myself than to
praise him. In all the literature I have studied so far, Godse appears as an evil man and
Gandhi a GodWhile his entire statement was eloquent with excellent reasoning and
literary values, the gems are below..
/*It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the
Mahatma betrayed
a total ignorance of the springs of human action*/
/*His (Gandhi) inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so
much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnahs iron will and proved to be powerless.*/
/*There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for
this reason I fired those fatal shots..*/
/* No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from
the inroads of Pakistan.*/
I feel guilty for living in such world of illusionOf course, I never believed Godse was so
foolish to do this act, but I never had chance to look at his view.
He is a true patriot and a true martyr. Take a bow Godse and kudoes to your bravery.. I
am proud of youRarely people like you come onto the earth and most of them get branded
as you.. but
One should not be judged by the actions to label him as a terrorist.. It should be the end
result.. Gandhi might have not killed millions by taking up the gun, but his policy and actions
did So, why not then call him a terrorist under the disguise of Mahatma.
/* I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value
thereof someday in future*/
Well, the future is here now..
_ "ay 9, 2014 at 2:07 am
Reply
(/india
/why-i-
killed-
gandhi
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
(
/search/)
Translate
http://www.sanskritimagazine.com
/contact/)
23 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Post Comment
Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail
Sear.h the (ebsite
Search in site...

2ra%slate to your =a%&ua&e:
Select Language
=i$e us o% Fa.eboo$
Sanskriti
37,856 people like Sanskriti.
Facebook social plugin
Like Like
A/s to support "issio% A(are%ess
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
24 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
Follo( us o% 2(itter
Follow @IndianSanskriti
(http://feedburner.google.com
/fb/a/mailverify?uri=sanskritimagazine/krKO&loc=en_US)
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/most_popular/)
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)
(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)
(https://safeweb.norton.com/report
/show?url=www.sanskritimagazine.com)
(http://www.weeklyvoice.com)
(https://www.indocanadians.ca)
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
25 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
>ho is #isiti%& ri&ht %o(
;ea/ A..or/i%& to 2opi.s
Select Category
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
26 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM
f
Facebook
(https://www.facebook.com
/SanskritiCultureOfIndia)
V
Twitter
(https://twitter.com/IndianSanskriti)
_
Google+
(https://plus.google.com
/u/0/105871646788034619689
/posts)
m
RSS
(http://feeds.feedburner.com
/sanskritimagazine/krKO)
Sanskriti Indian Culture All images and artworks are designed by our creative
staff | Website Designed by CreativeNerds
(mailto:creative.nerds@gmail.com)
/vedic_science
/indias-
mathematical-
heritage/)
$
/indian-
religions
/buddhism
/heart-
sutra/)
_
/contact/)
/search/)
Translate
27 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Why I Killed Gandhi

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Why I Killed Gandhi

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

f V _

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen