eft vs Right Brain Science leaves out Creator of this science by B JettShare

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 1:51pm | Edit Note | Delete

NOTE: Fear has been blamed on emotions or the faint of character historically.
This is fallacious 'information'. That is what left brain analytical, monolithic
logic grinds against wherein what we've termed logic has wrongly been embraced as
factual data. Hence, science and technology have been solely the methodology our
right brain (the holistic, perceptive, intuitive, and contextual emotive lobe) has
been trained reciprocally and for self-preservation to suppress its vital
functions. Facts, however, void of intuition force cognitive dissonance or
confusion, worry, and the literal dividing of our mind (one mind, two lobes which
cooperate if allowed).

Our society praises the result more so than the developmental journey of achieving
excellence as part of the result. The left brain supporters do so, under a
Pavlov's drooling dog notion, for understandable societal reasoning. Get up, go to
work, perform tasks specific to what they were told to be by a systemic
psychological aptitude test, earn money bi-weekly, and believe this is what life
consists of in its largest portion. Depression, restlessness, boredom, an under
girding guide since birth craves to be conceived via the right brain's demand to
create a happier mental and emotional condition; the subsequent logical left brain
squelching fights back and fear holds tight to standards seemingly unfounded but
nonetheless ascribed to if even ethically and morally disconcerting.

Explicitly by illustration: A Christian businessman observes wrong practices and

unfair prejudice in the work place. He discusses his concern with his wife who
pays the bills, runs the errands, and does the dirty work she disdains. She
convinces him that, after allowing him a few minutes to vent, that he is correct
in not being a "whistle blower" as certainly anywhere he'd go there he surely
would be up against the same political good old boy network.

~Pavlov revisited: "Reflexes make us react in a certain way. These reflexes are
called 'unconditioned', or built-in. The body responds in the same fashion every
time the stimulus is applied. In the same way, dogs drool when they encounter
food." (Source: Nobelprize.org)

Herein is where absurdity surfaces as we look at these words. "...reflexes are

called unconditional..."
Which reflexes and who decidedly finalized that reflexes such as I'll call
"justification" and "denial" related to the businessman's moral compass being true
North, was compromised or actually deemed factually as an accepted simulated
South?

Here, the stimuli is his knowledge that a rebuking on his part in confronting
conspicuous management discrepancies with his empirical sensory that his job ought
to be terminated by such an overtly scrupulousness. This failure would be, in
neighborhood and church goers eyesight, the greater egregious loss as money
trumps, in present day priority, the holistic and quite reasonable intuitive
conclusion. In the long haul, the sum total of employees will suffer eventual
financial loss and for some employees, a day to day internal quandary of
management's reckless encroachments will cause mixed mental and emotional fluxing
frustrations.

Allow me to use the word "conspicuous" in a sentence for contextual purposes. "He
felt uncomfortably conspicuous, since he was the only man in evening dress."

In context, the business man felt uncomfortable with his awareness that he,
regardless of other's knowledge and faint hearts, individually refused to
willfully do a repentant about face and in spite of fear, do the morally true
North star act of possible sacrifice. So, the one gentleman's overly formal dress
within the context sentence is well-nigh to the businessman's Holy-conscious�
conscience causing him to feel uncomfortable since he was the only man, logically,
that could exert self-will over himself.

The left and right sides of his brain rather than cooperate, were negating agents
to the world's pattern and a renewal of the businessman's brain must require faith
and trust enough in Providence or God to accept failure in light of the bigger
picture or holistic intuition that even an atheist ascribes to on occasions for
whatever intellectual reasons they might explain away. Assuming God exists, not to
follow a bigger picture of His guiding Spirit must be an issue of the power we
will allow the upper hand and final say so.God or His creation?

If God is only of some good when eventually creature power turns lily-livered in a
temporal context, then the left brain logic and scientific gullibility has been
conditioned (not 'unconditioned', or 'built-in' per Pavlov's Noble Prize winning
repartee) by ignorance or by willfully ignoring the truth of a stifling sort that
the right brain's creative capacity was conditioned for gleaning a Creator's
singular rightness of one way to operate. --Brian G. Jett � -2009