Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

QoE Deterministic Functions

Towards Evaluating Type-of-Service-Related


Quality-of-Experience on Mobile Networks
2014 FLAMINGO and SmartenIT
Find out more by visiting the FLAMINGO and SmartenIT homepages:
http://www.fp7-flamingo.eu
http://www.smartenit.eu
stiller@ifi.uzh.ch
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
gabi.dreo@unibw.de
tsiaras@ifi.uzh.ch
s.anuj@Jacobs-university.de
sebastian.seeber@unibw.de
doenni@ifi.uzh.ch
Prof. Dr. Burkhard Stiller
Prof. Dr. JrgenSchnwlder
Prof. Dr. Gabi Dreo Rodosek
Christos Tsiaras
Anuj Sehgal
Sebastian Seeber
Daniel Dnni
Architecture QoE Estimation Roadmap
Goal Partners
Preliminary Evaluation
Estimation of QoE in a mobile ecosystem
Measuring the performance of various protocols in Mobile
Network Operators (MNO) to estimate QoE through
measurements on an Android mobile application that:
Supports multiple
- measurements with different data types
- measuring locations
Calculate
- Mean Opinion Score (MOS) per measurement type
- MOS per set of parameters
Presents the QoE results on the ITU-T MOS scheme
recommendation
Measurable parameters and types-of-services
For each data traffic technical parameters
Bandwidth (Uplink, Downlink)
Latency
Jitter
Packet loss
Signal strength
are measured concerning the performance of the
related protocol such as
HTTP (Browsing)
RTSP, Flash (Video streaming)
SIP, RTP (Voice over IP)
Random (General)
and the results are used to estimate QoE through
a deterministic model and to reveal potential traffic
shaping.
5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
1
Bad
FLAMINGO
FLAMINGO
Measurement server in
Switzerland (Zurich)
Measurement server
in Germany (Bremen)
Measurement server
in Germany (Munich)
Measurement server in
The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
VoIP traffic Video streaming Browsing Random traffic
Mobile client
In U.S.A.
Mobile client
in Belarus
MNO/MVNO Test Location
MOS
Type
VoIP Video Browsing
Aldi Talk
Germany
(Bremen)
5.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
3.9
1.0
UMTS
EDGE
NettoKOM
Germany
(Bremen)
5.0
4.0
4.0
1.0
3.7
1.0
UMTS
EDGE
(9am)
Congstar
(7pm)
Germany
(Bremen)
5.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
UMTS
EDGE
UMTS
EDGE
MTS
Belarus
(Minsk)
5.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
UMTS
EDGE
AT&T
U.S.A., CA
(San Francisco)
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
UMTS
EDGE
4 ln
1 ) 1 ( 4
0
m
x
i
x
e e
m

3
4
ln
1 4
0
m
x
j
x
e e
m


N
k
w
k k
k
x e X E
1
] 1 ) ( [ 1 ) (
m = influence factor x
0
= expected value w
k
=participation weight
Download the PDF
of the paper here!