Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAS I
Publicat de
Universitatea Tehnic a ,,Gheorghe Asachi din Iasi
Tomul LV (LIX), Fasc. 2, 2009
Sect ia
CONSTRUCT II. ARHITECTUR
A
NUSSELT NUMBER AND CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER
COEFFICIENT FOR A COAXIAL HEAT EXCHANGER USING
Al
2
O
3
WATER pH=5 NANOFLUID
BY
R
T1
T3
T2
T2
T4
T2
D4 D3 D2 D1
Fig. 1. Schematic representation .
This exchanger is cover of an insulated sheath 4 cm thick with conductivity
performance k = 0.004 W/mK. These are U-tubes and in inox made (Fig. 2).
The temperatures of the two uids circulating respectively in the tube and
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Bul. Inst. Polit. Iasi, t. LV (LIX), f. 2, 2009 73
in the annular space are controlled by Platinum type sunder, measuring 0.1
C ,
placed at the entrances and exits.
The entrance of the tube and of the annular space (between the internal and
external tube) are each linked to a thermal reservoir with a constant level.
The mass ow of the uid entering into the tube as well as into the annular
space is controlled by a miniature owmeter. These mass ows are measured at
the exit with the aid of a graduated vase with an absolute uncertainty of 1 ml/s.
The average of heat transfer surface is 0.015 m
2
.
Fig. 2. Experimental set up.
Water pump is used for uid circulation inside and outside the inner tube with
a maximum mass ow of 48 l/h. Two congurations (co and counter current) are
possible. To place our exchanger in a solar collector application, we put a cooling
water uid in the channel with temperature of 15
C to 70
m
,
respectively
(2) c
n
= (1
v
)c
0
+
v
c
m
.
3.2. Dynamic Viscosity
The viscosity of the nanouid can be estimated with the existing relations for
the two phase mixture.
Drew and Passman introduced Einsteins formula for evaluating the effective
viscosity. Fluid is containing a dilute suspension of small rigid spherical particles.
(3)
n
=
0
(12, 5
v
)
This formula is restricted for low volumetric concentration of particle, under
0.05%.
Brinkman proposed to extend Einsteins formula to
(4)
n
=
0
(1
v
)
2.5
.
Other relations of effective viscosity of two phase mixture exist in the
literature. Each relation has it own limitation and application. Some complex
reaction has been observed by Nguyen [7].
Unfortunately results reveal that Brinkmans formula underestimates the few
experimental data present in literature.
Finally we choose the polynomial approximation based on experimental data
Nguyen [7], for waterAl
2
O
3
nanouid
(5)
n
(1%) = 3.6578510
11
T
4
4.8826710
8
T
3
+2.4539810
5
T
2
5.51071410
3
T +0.467545089,
(6)
n
(2%) = 3.9775210
11
T
4
5.3093710
8
T
3
+2.6684410
5
T
2
5.99230610
3
T +0.508404721,
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Bul. Inst. Polit. Iasi, t. LV (LIX), f. 2, 2009 75
(7)
n
(3%) = 4.514810
11
T
4
6.0265610
8
T
3
+3.0288910
5
T
2
6.80174410
3
T +0.577079809,
(8)
n
(4%) = 4.3857610
9
T
3
+4.4480710
6
T
2
1.51385710
3
T +0.173517495.
Fig. 3 shows the variation of viscosity of the nanouid considered as function
of the temperature as well as of the particle volume concentration.
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350
,
[
k
g
/
m
s
]
Temperature, [K]
water 1% 2% 3% 4%
Fig. 3. Variation of viscosity.
3.3. Conductivity
Lots of experimental researches have measured the thermal nanouid con-
ductivity and its evolution with temperature, but all data results are for the same
nanouid. Its because lots of parameters inuence this thermal conductivity
(concentration, shape and size of particles, dispersant, active or not mixed,
agglomeration, etc.).
We use following experimental nally (Fig. 4), were measure conductivity
instrument is KD2 by Decagon Devices Inc., with 8%precision. We heat adiabatic
water tank and put nanouid in an aluminium tank inside. So control nanouid
temperature varies from 5
C to 50
Nanofluid
Water tank
Heater
KD
Fig. 4. Conductivity experimental set up.
0.5000
0.5500
0.6000
0.6500
0.7000
0.7500
0.8000
280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350
,
[
W
/
m
.
k
]
Temperature, [K]
water 1% 2% 3% 4%
Fig. 5. Variation of conductivity.
(10)
n
(2%) = 7.4950210
6
T
2
+6.01164510
3
T 0.480642606,
(11)
n
(3%) = 7.699610
6
T
2
+6.17509210
3
T 0.4929312,
(12)
n
(4%) = 7.9080610
6
T
2
+6.34163210
3
T 0.505435331.
4. Nusselt Number and Heat Flux
4.1. In the Channel
Knowing temperature in and out, we can calculate the bulk temperature
(13) T
b f
=
T
2
+T
1
2
.
The Nusselt number for laminar ow in tube is
(14) Nu = 3.66,
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Bul. Inst. Polit. Iasi, t. LV (LIX), f. 2, 2009 77
and heat convection coefcient number for water is
(15) h
f
=
Nuk
f
D
h
,
with hydraulic diameter
(16) D
h
=
4S
P
= D
2
D
4
.
4.2. In the Inner Tube
It is possible to determine the heat ow absorbed by the nanouid by making
the following relation
(17)
av
=
f
+
n
2
,
with
(18)
f
= m
f
c
f
(T
2
T
1
)
and
(19)
n
= m
n
c
n
(T
3
T
4
).
The heat lost through the walls is obtained by calibration using water data for
various ow rates and is around 5%, knowing the thermal power absorbed by the
nanouid and the bulk temperature in the inner and channel tube
(20) T
bn
=
T
3
+T
4
2
.
We can determinate the convection coefcient number for nanouid:
(21) h
n
=
1
D
4
L
k
ln
D
2
D
4
D
4
2
inox
1
h
f
D
4
D
2
,
with
(22) k =
av
T
bn
T
bf
.
So Nusselt number is
(23) Nu
n
=
h
n
D
4
n
.
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
78 R azvan Silviu Luciu, Theodor Mateescu, Victoria Cotorobai and Thierry Mare
5. Results
Fig. 6 shows the variation of Nusselt number of the nanouid considered as
function of the temperature as well as of the particle volume concentration. We
can show that Nusselt average number increases with Reynolds number, and the
value is between 1.2 to 2.2. That is less than Nusselt number of 3.66 for laminar
ow in a tube.
The Nusselt number value decreases with volume concentration. We can note
for Reynolds number up to 500, that Nusselt number average is around: 1.9 for
1%, 1.9 for 2%, 1.9 for 3%, 1.8 for 4%.
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
N
u
s
s
e
l
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
Reynolds number
1% 2% 3% 4%
Fig. 6. Variation of Nusselt number.
Fig. 7 shows the variation of convection coefcient of the nanouid considered
as function of the temperature as well as of the particle volume concentration.
Convection coefcient increases with volume concentration, but difference is
maximum 15% between 1% and 4% with high Reynolds number. That because
when Nusselt number decreases with volume concentration, and conductivity
increase in the same time.
6. Conclusions
An experimental study was carried out in order to investigate the heat transfer
enhancement as provided by replacement of conventional uid, water, by a
nanouid inside a double pipe exchanger destined for solar application. The
nanouid used, which composed of aluminium oxide particles in suspension in
water (pH = 5), has been provided at various volume concentration ranging from
0% to 4%.
Experimental data have clearly shown a low Nusselt number due to the high
conductivity number for this uids, and high convection transfer coefcient.
New measured data where also provided regarding the surface temperature
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Bul. Inst. Polit. Iasi, t. LV (LIX), f. 2, 2009 79
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
c
o
n
v
e
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
Reynolds number
1% 2% 3% 4%
Fig. 7. Variation convection.
of the tube and not taking account only the bulk temperature to have a best
representation of heat transfer in a laminar ow with this kind of uid.
Notations
D tube diameter, [m];
conductivity, [W/m.K];
Nu Nusselt number;
S surface, [m
2
];
P perimeter [m];
D
h
hydraulic diameter, [m];
c specic capacity, [J/kg.K];
h convection heat transfer coefcient, [W/m
2
.K];
density, [kg/m
3
];
heat ux, [W];
v
volumetric concentration, [%];
dynamic viscosity, [kg/ms];
Indices
f cool uid (water in annulus);
o basic uid;
b bulk;
n nanouid;
EG Ethylen Glycol;
m nano particle;
Received, June 21, 2009
1
,,Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Jassy,
Department of Building Services.
and
2
INSA-Rennes, France
Civil and Mechanics Engineering Laboratory.
REFERENCES
1. Lee S., Choi S.U.S., Li S. et al., Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Nanouids
Containing Oxide Nanoparticuls. J. Heat Transfer, 121, 280289 (1999).
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
80 R azvan Silviu Luciu, Theodor Mateescu, Victoria Cotorobai and Thierry Mare
2. Huang R.C.R., Analysis of Microchannel Heat Sink Performance Using Nanouids.
Appl. Therm. Eng., 25, 17-18, 31043114 (2005).
3. Daungthongsuk S., Wongwises, A Critical Review of Convective Heat Transfer of
Nanouids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 1-23 (2005).
4. Pak B.C., Cho Y.I., Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Study of Dispersed Fluids with
Submicron Metallic Oxide Particles. Exp. Heat Transfer, 11, 2, 151170 (1998).
5. Li Q., Xuan Y., Conductive Heat Transfer Performance of Fluids with Nano-Particles.
Proc. of 12th Int. Heat Transfer, 2002, 483488.
6. Maiga S.E.B., Palm S.J., Cong T.N. et al., Heat Transfer Enhancement by Using
Nanouids in Forced Convection Flows. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 26, 530 546 (2005).
7. Nguyen C.T., Roy G., Lajoie P.R., Refroidissement des microprocesseurs ` a haute
performance en utilisant des nano uides. Congr` es Francais de Thermique, SFT,
Reims, 30 mai-2 juin 2005.
8. Palm S.J., Roy G., Nguyen C.T., Heat Transfer Enhancement with the Use of
Nanouids in Radial Flow Cooling Systems Considering TemperatureDependent
Properties. Appl. Therm. Eng., 26, 22092218 (2006).
NUM
ATOR DE
CALDUR
A COAXIAL UTILIZ
AND NANOFLUIDE
(Al
2
O
3
AP
A pH=5)
(Rezumat)
O nou a clas a de uide compuse din particule metalice n suspensie ntr-un lichid,
numite nanouide, a ap arut recent. C ateva studii numerice arat a c a aceast a nou a clas a
de uide posed a un potent ial remarcabil de transfer termic n comparat ie cu alte lichide
convent ionale. Studiul experimental prezentat aici indic a performant ele termice ale
nanouidului utilizat, compus din particule de oxid de aluminiu (Al
2
O
3
) dispersate in
ap a pH = 5, n diferite concentrat ii de la 0% la 4%.