The study aims to thoroughly evaluate the packet tracer by the researchers. Furthermore, the evaluators would like to know what are the major strengths and major weaknesses of the software to use as a basis for recommendation for future modification and enhancement. Packet Tracer is important because it allows students to experiment with network behavior without the need for real equipment and it also allows the teachers/instructors to assess the skills of a student. The impact of our evaluation is to make the packet tracer more efficient, reliable, and scalable for the users of this software will be satisfied.
6.1 Software Evaluation Criteria The researchers used the standardized criteria to understand the functions and to evaluate the software. They only covered four (4) aspects of the software. The criteria to evaluate are the only appropriate to the software. For each applicable criterion, rate the program: 5 = Outstanding 4 = Good 3 = Satisfactory 2 = Poor 1 = Unsatisfactory
6.1.1 Information in the Program These information criteria cover the following aspects of the program: relevance to the audience, appropriate language, organization of the information, and information quality.
6.1.2 User Interaction These criteria cover the user's interaction with the program, the objectives and features of the program, and your analysis of it.
6.1.3 Technical Aspects of the Software and Materials These criteria cover aspects of the computer hardware and programs.
1. The information is clear, concise, and informative to the intended audience 5 4 3 2 1 2. The content is free from spelling and grammatical errors 5 4 3 2 1 3. The information for each topic encourages comparisons among schools or occupations 5 4 3 2 1 4. Information about educational programs covers program objectives, specialties, degrees conferred, sample courses, and schools offering the program 5 4 3 2 1 1. The language in the program and in the user's guide is clear to the intended audience 5 4 3 2 1 2. The individual can operate the program independently, creating his or her own sequence of presentation and review 5 4 3 2 1 3. The program acknowledges input. Feedback on user responses is employed effectively
5 4 3 2 1 4. Invalid commands are handled constructively. The program tolerates variations in command formats (e.g., upper or lower case, extra spaces, etc.) 5 4 3 2 1 5. Individuals can easily start and exit the program. It is easy to back up, change answers, and give commands
5 4 3 2 1 6.1.4 Career Development Process These criteria evaluate the compatibility of the program with important career development principles.
1. Computer capabilities such as graphics, color, or sound are used for appropriate instructional reasons 5 4 3 2 1 2. If the program requires special equipment, the requirements are minimal and clearly stated by the developer
5 4 3 2 1 3. The program is reliable in normal use. Software is bug free 5 4 3 2 1 4. The program provides a copy or summary of its basic information to the user for future reference 5 4 3 2 1 5. Updates can be loaded easily into the system
5 4 3 2 1 1. The program motivates individuals to develop their own career plans 5 4 3 2 1 2. The program fosters self-knowledge relevant to work and learning
5 4 3 2 1 3. The program helps individuals to integrate and develop their values, interests, abilities, skills, and goals
5 4 3 2 1 4. Using the program broadens an individual's awareness of current options for employment and education
5 4 3 2 1 5. The program provides information that can be useful in instruction 5 4 3 2 1
6.2 Software Testing Procedures
6.2.1 Interface Test The interface of the software was tested by the researchers to check if they work properly. The researchers validate that the functionality of the interfaces has no problem.
6.2.2 Usability The researcher verifies that the user interface is easy to use and understand.
6.2.3 Security Testing is done by the researchers which confirm that the program can restrict access to authorized personnel and that the authorized personnel can access the functions available to their security level.
7.0 Software Enhancement Specification Indeed the software selected by the researchers contains primarily necessary functions for its purpose. However, there are possibility for enhancements and opportunities identified by evaluators as main components and factors to attract more users such as students, teachers, and even network engineer to use the software product, creates a more engagement with users, eliminate unnecessary procedures which prolong the navigation of users before it can use a certain function.
7.1 Proposed Additional Features and Functions
The researchers thought of taking an additional tool for designing network cable lines. Having this new feature, the user is able to control the flow of the cables. It is necessary to arrange the cables properly when presenting a logical network layout.