0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
304 Ansichten1 Seite
1) There is a gap between the country manager and Asia-Pacific manager's growth goals for Gillette Indonesia, with projections of 19% and 25-30% respectively.
2) While Gillette has high brand awareness overall in Indonesia, awareness is much lower for disposable razors and the Sensor product, which are expected to be the biggest drivers of growth.
3) Cultural barriers like slower beard growth and lower supermarket shopping rates present challenges for product placement and distribution in Indonesia. Distributors are often located in poor areas and competitors lure away salespeople.
Originalbeschreibung:
Pia Adolphsen's analysis of Gillette India HBR case.
1) There is a gap between the country manager and Asia-Pacific manager's growth goals for Gillette Indonesia, with projections of 19% and 25-30% respectively.
2) While Gillette has high brand awareness overall in Indonesia, awareness is much lower for disposable razors and the Sensor product, which are expected to be the biggest drivers of growth.
3) Cultural barriers like slower beard growth and lower supermarket shopping rates present challenges for product placement and distribution in Indonesia. Distributors are often located in poor areas and competitors lure away salespeople.
1) There is a gap between the country manager and Asia-Pacific manager's growth goals for Gillette Indonesia, with projections of 19% and 25-30% respectively.
2) While Gillette has high brand awareness overall in Indonesia, awareness is much lower for disposable razors and the Sensor product, which are expected to be the biggest drivers of growth.
3) Cultural barriers like slower beard growth and lower supermarket shopping rates present challenges for product placement and distribution in Indonesia. Distributors are often located in poor areas and competitors lure away salespeople.
What marketing plan would be appropriate for Gillette Indonesia? Questions in the text: Should market be allowed to grow at own pace? Should Gillette invest additional resources in sales/dist to accelerate market development? What should be emphasized? Danger of losing investment if spent on concepts beyond consumers? Problem #1: Distance between Company Goals The country manager (Allen) and Asia-Pacific manager (Effio) have a gap between their growth goals for the region Allen projects 19%, Effio expects 25-30%. Problem #2: Brand Awareness Initially, it seems that brand identity is not a problem (97% of men are aware of Gillette.) However, further analysis of the growth projections shows that biggest jumps in growth are expected to come from disposables and the Sensor project, which had much lower brand awareness (disposables having a 41% and 9% recognition, and the Sensor having only 12%). Problem #3: Cultural Barriers Shaving is still an emerging art in Indonesia. Increasing instances of shaving may be difficult due to the fact that Asian beards dont grow as quickly. Plus, the products are harder to place due to lower numbers of supermarket shoppers in addition to high rates of supermarket placement. Distributors are often in poor areas and difficult to communicate with; salespeople are lured away by competitors, but are of increasing importance due to cultural know-how. Goals: Advertising goals: 1 st shave, increasing incidences of shaving, and trading existing shavers to a higher cost system. Growth goals: Allen, 19%, Effio 25-30%. Recommendations: Should the market be allowed to grow at its own pace? What is that pace? The market is growing quickly (whether 19% or 25%, the growth rate is still significant.) Based on current growth patterns, market development investment is tricky, due to the fact that the infrastructure of the country is also concern. Im not sure that additional market development budget would solve distribution or sales challenges, if these are caused primarily by poor infrastructure. The current allocation of marketing funds seems reasonable, so long as campaigns around the 1 st shave and increasing shaves objectives focused on disposables, where brand awareness is still lacking. A third of the budget to increase the awareness and usage of the Sensor seems reasonable also, assuming it is targeted only at the higher income consumer who can afford this product and acquire it at a supermarket. If anything, I believe a fourth advertising category could be added and funded, a branding initiative to encourage both the act of shaving, and the brand of Gillette, as Indonesian. The focus would be primarily PR its an Indonesian made product, were hiring locally (which would also support recruiting objectives and potentially deter salesmen from jumping ship if they identified strongly with the message), shaving is an act that binds all of us together as Indonesians (were not some barbaric country). This would be a longer term campaign, and payoff would not be immediate. However, the only way to overcome infrastructure problems is to work within the countrys structures and encourage the local population to embrace not just the products, but the company itself.