Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
-
2015
DISPLAY
UNTIL 11-19-13
2014 ANNUAL
SIM INTERNATIONAL
TUNER SERIES
CAR TRUCK SUV
MODELS RATED
& REVIEWED
COMPARISONS
HOT COMPACTS
FULL-SIZE SEDANS
DRIVES
CHEVY SILVERADO
ACURA MDX
HYUNDAI SANTA FE
We didnt reinvent the wheel,
just the way they steer.
RLX with Technology Package shown. Learn more at acura.com or by calling 1-800-To-Acura. 2013 Acura. Acura, RLX and Precision All-Wheel Steer are trademarks of Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
INTRODUCING THE RLX WITH PRECISION ALL-WHEEL STEER.
Designed to give the driver unprecedented control, the Precision All-Wheel
Steer system aboard the RLX allows each rear wheel to independently adjust
its angle through turns. Its the most advanced steering system weve ever
built, not to mention an industry first. Its luxury, taken to a whole new level.
The new Acura RLX. Handsomely equipped at
$
54,450. Excludes
$
895 destination, tax, title, license and registration.
Editorial
Editor-in-Chief Edward Loh @EdLoh
Executive Editor Ron Kiino @RonKiino
Editor at Large Angus MacKenzie @Angus_Mack
Detroit Editor Scott Burgess @AutoCritic
Senior Features Editor Jonny Lieberman @MT_Loverman
European Editor Paul Horrell
Japan Editor Peter Lyon
Associate Editor/Truck Trend
Allyson Harwood @TruckTrendAH
Associate Editor Scott Evans @MT_Evans
Associate Editor Mike Febbo @MT_MikeFebbo
Associate Editor Rory Jurnecka @RoryJurnecka
Manager, Visual Assets Brian Vance @BrianNVance
Photography Editor Julia LaPalme @monstergrrl
Associate Photography Editor Michael Shafer
Technical
Technical Director Frank Markus @MT_Markus
Testing Director Kim Reynolds
Road Test Editor Scott Mortara
Associate Road Test Editor Carlos Lago @CarlosLago
Art
Creative Director Alan Muir
Managing Art Director Mike Royer @MT_Royer
Senior Art Director Andy Mock
Assistant Art Director William Walker @MT_dubdub
Archivist Thomas Voehringer
Production
Copy Chief Emiliana Sandoval @Emiliana505
Copy Editor Jacqueline Manfredi @Loves_Wylie
Managing Editor Rusty Kurtz
Advertising Coordinator Gail Petito
Contributors
Correspondents John Carey, Mike Connor,
Gavin Green, Jeremy Hart, Ben Oliver,
James Tate, Gary Witzenburg
Photographers Wesley Allison, Nick Bailey,
Mark Bramley, Brian Brantley, Daniel Byrne, David Freers,
Jim Frenak, Robert Guio, Robert Kerian, Evan Klein, Jessica Walker
Artists Nigel Buchanan, Doug Fraser, Steve Hewett,
Kevin House, Paul Laguette, Glenn Lumsden, Jason Raish,
Mark Stehrenberger
Motor Trend Online
Digital Integration Director Michael Floyd @MT_Floyd
Digital Content Director Chris Clonts @CClonts
News Director Zach Gale @ZachGale
Production Manager Kirill Ougarov @kougarov
Associate Online Editors Erick Ayapana @Erkayapana,
Benson Kong, Nate Martinez @Nate_Martinez, Carol Ngo,
Alex Nishimoto, Karla Sanchez, Jason Udy, Sheree Yang,
Christian Seabaugh @C_Seabaugh
Online Editor Truck Trend Melissa Spiering
Motor Trend Television
Director, SIM Video Mike Suggett
Creative Manager Jim Gleason
Production Manager Brett Adkins
Post Production Manager Duane Sempson
Production Coordinators Brenda De Guzman,
Allison Meriwether
Senior Video Producers Corey Denomy, Clint Stringfellow
Writer/Host/Producer Jessi Lang @ImJessiLang
Video Producers Bradford Alicea, Cyrus Cambridge,
Anthony Esposito, Ron James, Travis LaBella, Mark Lenardon,
Terren Lin, David Rivera, Felicia Robles,
Levi Rugg, Gabriel Sanchez, Kenneth Thompson,
Mike Villa, Sandon Voelker, Mike Wilson
Motor Trend Auto Shows
SVP, General Manager John F. Marriott
VP, Executive Producer Steve Freeman
Motor Trend Certied Vehicles
VP and Executive Director Ira Gabriel
National Marketing Manager Brad Hutcheson
MOTOR TREND
ADVERTISING
EVP, GROUP PUBLISHER
Eric Schwab
Advertising Sales
Chicago Tel: (312) 396-0620 Marc Gordon
Detroit 4327 Delemere Court, Royal Oak, Mi 48073
Tel: (248) 594-5999 Joe Didato, Mike DeTurris, Matt Smith
Los Angeles 831 S. Douglas St., El Segundo, Ca 90245
Tel: (310) 531-9900 Mark Dewey, Matt Smart, Alan Reed,
Bryan Fonseca, Chuck Miller
New York 261 Madison Ave., 6Th Flr., New York, Ny 10016
Tel: (212) 915-4000 Janet Catallo, Jim Keplesky
To advertise on this magazines website, or any of Source Interlink
Medias other enthusiast sites,
please contact us at, IM-Advertising@sorc.com
Motor Trend Automotive Group
Senior Publishing Director Maria Jamison
VP, Digital Media Jason Rice
VP, Marketing Ryan Payne
VP, Editorial Operations Amy Diamond
VP, Manufacturing and Advertising Operations
Greg Parnell
Senior Director, Ad Operations Pauline Atwood
Director, Publishing Technologies Dale Bryson
Marketing Director Shawn Higgins
Creative Marketing Manager Alex Flores
Senior Finance Director Jenny Lee
Assistant to the President Desiree J. Borja
Assistant to the Group Publisher Ching Cornforth
Ofcers Of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc.
President and Chief Executive Ofcer Michael Sullivan
EVP, Chief Financial Ofcer John Bode
EVP, Chief Administrative Ofcer Stephanie Justice
EVP, Chief Procurement Ofcer Kevin Mullan
Source Interlink Media, Llc
President Chris Argentieri
General Manager David Algire
Chief Creative Ofcer Alan Alpanian
SVP, Finance Dan Bednar
VP, Single Copy Sales and Marketing Chris Butler
EVP, Enthusiast Automotive Doug Evans
SVP, New Product Development Howard Lim
Chief Content Ofcer Angus MacKenzie
Chief Analytics Ofcer John Marriott
SVP, Business Development Tyler Schulze
EVP, Sales and Marketing Eric Schwab
Digital Media
Chief Technology Ofcer, Digital Media Raghu Bala
SVP, Digital Marketing Craig Buccola
SVP, Digital Product Development Todd Busby
VP, Product Management Geof DeFrance
VP, Digital Advertising Products and Operations
Jung Park
Consumer Marketing,
Enthusiast Media
Subscription Company, Inc.
VP, Consumer Marketing Tom Slater
VP, Retention and Operations Fulllment
Donald T. Robinson III
Any submissions or contributions from readers shall be subject
to and governed by Source Interlink Medias User Content
Submission Terms and Conditions, which are posted at http://privacy.
sourceinterlinkmedia.com/submissions.html.
Canada Post: Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to IMEX Global Solutions,
P.O. Box 25542, London, ON N6C 6B2.
Subscriptions: E-mail address changes to motortrend@
emailcustomerservice.com, write to P.O. Box 420235, Palm
Coast, FL 32142-0235 or call 800/800-6848 (U.S.), 386/447-6383
(international). Include name, address, and phone number on
any inquiries. Occasionally, our subscriber list is made available
to reputable rms ofering goods and services we believe would
be of interest to our readers. If you prefer to be excluded, send
your current address label and a note requesting exclusion from
these promotions to Source Interlink Media, LLC, 831 S. Douglas
St., El Segundo, CA 90245, Attn.: Privacy Coordinator. Copyright
2013 by Source Interlink Magazines, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/
PRINTED IN THE USA.
Reprints: Contact Wrights Media @ 877/652-5295 (281/419-
5725 outside the U.S. and Canada) to purchase quality custom
reprints or e-prints of articles appearing in this publication.
2014
-
2015
CAR TRUCK SUV
SIGNING ON THE
DOTTED LINE
Allyson Harwood
THE ACT OF SIGNING your name at the
boom of a sales contract takes only
secondsmaybe 5 if you have a really
long namebut preparing to buy a new
car, truck, sport/utility, or van can take
much longer. This is especially true for
smart shoppers who want to make sure
they get the most for their money while
geing the right type of vehicle. But
as anyone who seeking a new vehicle
knows, there is a lot to the process of
narrowing it all down.
Lets say youve decided you want to
buy a sport/utility vehicle. The best way
to start is a list of what you want and what
you need. Whats your price range? Do
you need two rows or three? Would it
make more sense to go with a four-
cylinder engine for beer fuel economy,
or is that engine in that particular vehicle
too underpowered? Do you prefer two-,
all-, or four-wheel drive? What about the
safety equipment that comes standard
with the vehicle? How much can it tow?
These questions can seem overwhelming
at rst, but once you nish the list, nding
the answers starts to get easier. Because
now that the list is done, you can thumb
through Motor Trends Car, Truck, and
SUV Buyers Guide to see what vehicle or
vehicles best line up with your list.
Included in this guide are capsules that
cover every new car, pickup truck, sport/
utility vehicle, crossover, minivan, and full-
size van sold in the United States for 2014.
We even have sneak previews of some
2015 models. For all the vehicles, we
include information on the engines that
are available, fuel economy, performance,
safety, and warranties. Van capsules also
add the number or seats thatll fold at,
so you have a beer idea of whether or
not its easy to congure the interior for
your needs. With trucks and SUVs, weve
included towing capacity and payload.
For all vehicles, we tell you whats new for
2014, and the editors of Motor Trend give
you their opinions on each vehicle.
Buying a new vehicle can be
intimidating. Its an investment of both
time and money. Were here to help.
If you do the research ahead of time,
signing on the doed line wont be such
a daunting experience.
4 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
06 SMALL IN Compact Sedans
The latest compacts on the market face
the reigning champion. Scott Evans
20 FULL ON Large Sedans
The newest large sedans take on the old guard.
Rory Jurnecka
33 NEWCOMER Hyundai Santa Fe Scott Burgess
34 Chevrolet Silverado New truck proves character
starts from within. Scott Burgess
40 Acura MDX
Acura rewrites a crowd-pleasing favorite. Ron Kiino
www.motortrend.com
NEW CAR
BUYERS GUIDE
168 Models Reviewed Motor Trend Editors
SUV
,
TRUCK & VAN
BUYERS GUIDE
126 Models Reviewed Motor Trend Editors
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 5
Dodge Dart ................... $26,415
Honda Civic .................$24,555
Kia Forte ....................... $25,610
Mazda3 .........................$26,420
Nissan Sentra .............. $23,715
Prices as tested
COMPACT SEDANS
According to the old maxim,
Americans dont like small cars.
We buy trucks by the truckload
and midsize sedans more than
any other car segment. But because of gas
prices, the tough economy, or both, the
compact segment is growing. In 2012, it
accounted for roughly 13 percent of the U.S.
car market, with most entrants registering
sales increases over 2011. With frugality in
vogue, automakers expect the segment to
keep growing during the next several years.
Last year, the Mazda3 went bumper to
bumper with the Chevrolet Cruze, Ford
Focus, Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, and
Volkswagen Jetta in a battle of 40-mpg-
capable cars. The Mazda won because we
framed the conversation thus: Is there a
40-mpg car youd want to own? The ques-
tion was directed at the enthusiast who
wants an high-efficiency car thats also
fun to drive. In that measure, the Mazda
was without question the Goldilocks car. It
finished mid-pack on fuel economy, but it
was far and away the drivers choice.
Since then, three new pretenders to the
throne have arisen, and a fourth (Honda)
Words Scott Evans
Photographs Mike Shafer
6 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
made an emergency update to better
position it against the competition. More
important, were no longer asking which
is the best sports car, but which is the best
all-around car for the average consumer.
Were looking for the car that offers the
best value, content, fuel economy, and
safety in addition to performance. Its a
whole new ballgame.
1 Honda Civic 2 Nissan Sentra
3 Mazda3 4 Dodge Dart 5 Kia Forte
1
2
3
4
5
The latest compacts on the market face the reigning champion
HOP IN None of these cars compares
with riding a roller coaster, for better
or worse, but youll often nd many
copies of each in the parking lot of
Six Flags Magic Mountain.
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 7
Honda Civic
0-30 3.2 sec
0-40 4.6
0-50 6.8
0-60 9.1
0-70 11.9
0-80 15.8
0-90 20.1
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 4.7
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.81 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.5 sec @ 0.58 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2000 rpm
Dodge Dart
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 3.2 sec
0-40 4.7
0-50 6.6
0-60 8.9
0-70 11.7
0-80 15.1
0-90 19.1
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 4.6
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.83 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.0 sec @ 0.61 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2300 rpm
in handling. The Sentra received constant
complaints of terminal understeer, egregious
body roll, and lifeless steering. Said associ-
ate online editor Karla Sanchez: This car
handled so terribly, I couldnt wait until the
loop was over.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, the
Kia Forte surprised everyone. In general,
weve known Kias to have rough rides and
elastic-feeling steering, but not this car.
The ride was pleasantly firm, almost sporty,
and the steering felt naturally weighted and
Ride & Handling
In claiming its previous victory, the Mazda3
dazzled the judges with its crisp, natural
steering feel; responsive, unshakable chassis;
and sport sedan handling. It led this competi-
tion with the same trump card, at least in
the dry. As it happened, rain struck during
our evaluation loops, and opinions of the
Mazda changed quickly. Those who drove it
in the dry were again smitten with its excel-
lent handling on the winding road portion.
Those who drove it in the wet, however, told
a different tale. Despite its all-season tires,
the Mazda3 suddenly suffered a distinct lack
of grip and editors found it breaking loose at
both ends on wet roads when pushed hard,
eroding confidence. We were left to wonder
what all-season tires would have done for
its all-around performance. One point we all
agreed on was the ride quality, which was
among the best in the group.
Another car that divided the judges was
the Dodge Dart. Opinions were mixed on
the thick, meaty steering wheel. While it felt
direct, the steering was surprisingly heavy.
Also heavy was the car itself, outweighing the
nearest competitor by more than 300 pounds,
and it felt heavy from behind the wheel. The
Dart threw its heft into a corner, but once the
weight transferred, it was a smooth and stable
handler. The weight made the car feel planted
on the road, but it also hurt the ride quality,
though it wasnt the worst in the group.
In terms of ride and handling, the worst
was the Nissan Sentra. There wasnt a large
difference in ride quality among the group,
but the Sentra was at the bottom of the
spectrum. Where it really disappointed was
responsive, though it still provided no feed-
back. Many editors found it the second-most
fun car to drive behind the Mazda.
Somewhere in the middle was the Civic.
The lightest of the group, it felt that way on
the road. Ride quality and handling both fell
in the middle of the pack, though the steering
took some hits. Editor-in-chief Edward Loh
found that the light steering feels artificial
and requires jerky inputs. Initial input doesnt
seem to do much, so I kept dialing in more
and more steering. Hard to be smooth.
Kia Forte
Mazda3
Nissan
Sentra
Dodge Dart
16.8 sec @ 84.6 mph
16.9 sec @ 82.5 mph
16.0 sec @ 87.3 mph
16.5 sec @ 85.9 mph
8.9
9.1
7.8
8.3
9.7
0-60 mph Quarter Mile
Honda Civic
Dodge Dart
The only car rolling on
chromies made the
Dart stand out among
all the alloys.
Honda Civic
Not just a back-up
camera, the Civic
gives you multiple
camera angles
including panoramic
and straight down for
maximum visibility.
Kia Forte
Power-folding mirrors
on a $25,610 car? We
love it when luxury
features trickle down.
Notable
Features
Mazda3
The proper way to orient
a manual shifting feature,
and were glad Mazda
(and Dodge) agree.
Nissan Sentra
There was no question,
the Sentra had the most
rear seat room by far,
with more than some
midsize sedans.
17.4 sec @ 80.1 mph
Kia Forte
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 2.7 sec
0-40 4.1
0-50 5.7
0-60 7.8
0-70 10.3
0-80 13.2
0-90 17.1
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 4.2
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.80 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.6 sec @ 0.60 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2000 rpm
Mazda3
0-30 2.9 sec
0-40 4.5
0-50 6.3
0-60 8.3
0-70 11.3
0-80 14.4
0-90 18.5
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 4.5
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.79 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.0 sec @ 0.60 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1700 rpm
Performance
The Kia surprised us at the track. It was the
quickest to 60 mph by half a second and
stopped the shortest from the same speed by
2 feet. On our skidpad, it put up respectable
grip numbers and was the quickest around
our figure-eight course.
Out in the real world, we found the power
strong compared with the rest of the group,
and the transmission shifted quickly and
smoothly and seemed never to select the
wrong gear.
Less surprising was the poor showing
from the Sentra. It was the slowest to reach
60 mph and needed the longest distance to
stop, which confirmed driving impressions.
The primary culprit in drivetrain complaints
was the continuously variable transmission,
which all agreed was slow to respond and
then provided insufficient additional lever-
age when it did. Despite its poor handling on
the road and lowest average g on the figure-
eight test, the Sentra did manage to tie the
Dart for the highest average g on the skidpad,
even though it was all understeer on the road.
The Dart was a disappointment. Its raspy
exhaust and turbocharged engine seemed to
promise performance, but its jog to 60 mph
fell right in the middle of the pack, as did its
stopping distance. As noted above, it posted
the highest average g on the skidpad and the
figure eight, but tied the Mazda for second
in figure-eight lap time. Where the Dart
really fell down was in everyday driving. The
dual-clutch transmission was jerky and often
seemed confused in automatic mode.
Nissan Sentra
0-30 3.4 sec
0-40 5.1
0-50 7.1
0-60 9.7
0-70 13.0
0-80 17.3
0-90
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 5.2
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.83 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.1 sec @ 0.57 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1650 rpm
121 ft
119 ft
117 ft
120 ft
124 ft
Braking 60-0
The only remedy was to manually shift
using the gear stick, which delivered fairly
quick and crisp shifts, though it upshifted
automatically at redline.
We were likewise disappointed in the
Civic. The engine felt weak at low rpm, but
like the Sentra, the fault lies squarely with
the transmission. The aging five-speed
gearbox was slow to shift and had no manual
mode. This carried over to the track, where
it was the second slowest to 60 mph and the
slowest around the figure eight. Its low curb
weight contributed to the second shortest
stopping distance, but it posted mid-pack
average g numbers.
The Mazda3 was a curiosity rather than
a disappointment. Despite its stellar dry
performance on the road, it didnt post the big
numbers at the track. It was the second-quick-
est to 60 mph and around the figure eight, but
dead last on the skidpad. It also finished third
in braking. Somehow, though, it all came
together on real-world roads, making the
Mazda3 the clear drivers favorite.
These arent sport sedans, but three of the five were surprisingly fun to drive.
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 9
Dodge Dart Dimensions
TURNING CIRCLE 36.5
CURB WEIGHT 3306 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R 61/39%
HEADROOM, F/R 38.6/37.0 in
LEGROOM, F/R 42.2/35.2 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 58.2/56.1 in
CARGO VOLUME 13.1 cu
61.7
72.0
106.4
61.6
183.9
Efficiency
The two cars with the most overt techno-
logical approaches to fuel efficiency
performed the poorest. An accelerating
trend in the automotive industry today is to
replace a larger engine with a smaller, turbo-
charged one that, in theory, provides the
same power while using less fuel. This was
not the case for the Dart. Its turbocharged
1.4-liter engine was the smallest and offered
the most torque and second-highest horse-
power rating, but it returned a dismal 19.5
mpg on our evaluation loops, well below its
EPA estimates of 27/37 mpg city/highway. On
top of that, it was the only car in the test that
required premium fuel, a cost consideration
for value-conscious buyers.
Likewise unimpressive was the Sentras
continuously variable transmission,
which should theoretically always be at the
optimum gearing for fuel economy. With
the least horsepower and tied for the least
torque, youd expect the Sentra wouldnt
burn much fuel, but it returned the second-
lowest observed fuel economy at 21.2 mpg.
With ratings at 30/39 mpg city/highway, it
was a long way off. Nissan might be on to
something, quipped senior features editor
Jonny Lieberman. No one will drive this car
quickly and in an inefficient manner, as it
actually sounds like youre injuring the car
with your right foot.
5
7
.
7
59.0
69.0
105.1
59.9
179.4
As much as we knock the Civic because
its old five-speed transmission doesn't offer
manual control, it still gets the job done. The
Civic was the second-least powerful car pres-
ent and it felt like it behind the wheel, but
that little engine and old gearbox know how
to use fuel wisely. The Civic returned 23.5
mpg, which, while not stellar, was at least
closer to its 28/39-mpg city/highway ratings.
Kia had a rough go of it last year after the
EPA lowered the fuel economy ratings on a
number of its cars. The Forte wasn't affected,
and the new model certainly delivered.
Despite having the most horsepower and
second-highest torque rating, as well as a
conventional six-speed automatic, the Kia
returned 24.4 mpgfalling just within
the EPA city/highway ratings of 24/36 mpg
and good for second best in this compari-
son. Moreover, it was the only competitor
whose observed fuel economy fell within
its EPA ratings.
The big winner, though, was the car
that won the fuel economy comparison
on handling rather than mpg. The Mazda3,
with its funny-sounding Skyactiv badging
and no obvious technological tricks (theyre
all deep inside the engine), was the longest-
running model in this test and by far the
fuel-sipping champ. It handily bested the
competition by returning 25.3 mpg, but fell
short of its 28/40-mpg city/highway rating.
The Civic is the only car here named a Top Safety Pick+ from the IIHS.
LAYOUT FWD, 5-PASS, 4-DOOR SEDAN
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 11
2013 Mazda3 i Grand Touring Old design and cheap materials are offset by great seats.
Linear, nicely weighted,
communicative and direct;
the Mazda has the best
steering, no question.
Three dierent screens try to deliver
too much information at once, and
mismatched colors and fonts look
thrown together, not designed.
Big bolsters make the Mazda seats the
best in a corner. So padding makes
them comfortable on long trips, too.
2013 Dodge Dart Limited MultiAir Great design, lots of features, and neat graphics.
A massive in-dash screen
replaces some gauges and
allows a lot of customization.
The large touch screen is a
great standard feature, but the
Kias is just a lile easier to use.
Pulling up the passenger seat boom
cushion reveals a handy hidden storage bin.
2013 Nissan Sentra SL The simple design takes no chances. It just works.
Wood trim on the
doors and center console
aempts to make the
interior look more upscale.
Infotainment system is
simple and very intuitive, if
a bit small compared with
others in the test.
Flat front seats oer no support when
turning, but the rear seats have more
room than some larger cars.
Cockpit/Cabin
Many people put a lot of stock in how a car
looks, but the truth is, youll spend far more
time looking at the inside of it than the
outside, and it greatly shapes your percep-
tion of the vehicle. In this category, the Sentra
clawed back some favor with the judges. The
rear seat and trunk are cavernous for the
class, and the navigation and entertainment
systems are simple and intuitive to use. Some
editors found the design dull, likening it to
a doctors waiting room, but others pointed
out that it barely feels downmarket from the
larger, more expensive Altima, a nice treat for
a value-conscious buyer.
The Forte received similar praise for being
second to the Sentra in rear seat space. It was
also dinged, albeit less so, for being cold and
dark with some odd ridges on the dash. Those
gripes were quickly overlooked, however, in
light of the segment-busting list of features,
such as heated and cooled front seats and
power-folding mirrors.
Also feature-rich was the Dart, with its
massive touch-screen infotainment system
and high-resolution, reconfigurable gauge
display. We appreciated the clear, easy-to-
use UConnect infotainment system, even
if it did seem a bit cluttered compared with
Kias UVO system. Editors also liked the front
and back steering wheel controls. Where
the Dart struggled was in seating, with hard
perches front and rear and compromised rear
headroom. Editors also complained about the
grainy, low-resolution back-up camera.
Riding mid-pack was the Civic, whose
bi-level instrument cluster and funky shapes
divided editors. It was given high marks for
being a strong improvement over the poorly
received 2012 model, and we appreciated the
better materials and quieter cabin. We took
issue, though, with the old, low-resolution
nav and its tiny buttons, and rear seat space
ranked smallest among the competitors.
The Mazda3 received some of the harshest
criticism. While we liked its sporty, support-
ive seats overall, many were disappointed
with its small, cramped rear seat. The dash-
board looked the oldest and appearing to be
made of the cheapest materials.
The split screens are the least well-
organized/executed, wrote Loh. None of
the screens matches in background colors,
fonts, or font colors, not in the instrument
panel, infotainment screen, or the two tiny
screens above. We were disappointed with
the lack of a back-up camera, but delighted
by the preferred manual shifting orientation
of forward for downshifts and backward for
upshifts, which the Dart shared.
2013 Honda Civic EX Video-game design is augmented by new, higher-quality materials.
A second display screen at the top
of the dash allows you to see audio
information while eaving the map
on the main screen below.
The old navigation
system has dated,
low-res maps and
ergonomic issues.
The seats are comfortable for long
trips, but not particularly sporty.
The steering wheel buon changes
steering eort and response
between Normal, Comfort, and Sport.
UVO infotainment system
looks sharp and is easy
to usethe best here.
The Forte's seats arent quite as sporty as
the Mazdas, but are a good compromise
between support and comfort.
2014 Kia Forte EX Has a monochrome finish and odd ridges, but a high feature count.
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 13
Kia Forte Dimensions
TURNING CIRCLE 34.8
CURB WEIGHT 2944 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R 61/39%
HEADROOM, F/R 39.1/37.3 in
LEGROOM, F/R 42.2/35.9 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 56.1/54.9 in
CARGO VOLUME 14.9 cu
5
6
.
5
Safety
With safety a key concern among buyers, its
no surprise all these competitors performed
well in crash testing. They werent, however,
all created equal. For example, Honda found
out about the Insurance Institute for High-
way Safetys new small-offset crash test and
designed the new Civic accordingly. So the
Civic is the only car here named a Top Safety
Pick+ after receiving a Good score in all tests.
(None of the others has yet completed the
small-offset test.) The 2013 Civic hasnt been
tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, but the 2012 car received
5-star front and side ratings and a 4-star
rollover rating for 5 stars overall.
Like the Honda, the 2014 Forte hasnt been
crash-tested yet. In this case, though, the
Kia is a thoroughly redesigned car and not a
refresh, so its difficult to say how it will fare.
The old Forte, for what its worth, received
4 stars and Good ratings in all tests and was
named a Top Safety Pick.
Its a similar story with the 2013 Sentra,
which also has yet to be fully tested. NHTSA
has crashed it, and gave it a 5-star side impact
rating, 4 stars for front and rollover tests, and
4 stars overall. IIHS hasnt tested it, but the
old model was not a Top Safety Pick because
of an Acceptable rating in the roof crush test.
There is plenty of information, however,
on the oldest car in the test. The Mazda3 is an
61.3
70.1
106.3
61.8
179.5
When it came to ride and handling, the smooth and sporty Forte surprised everyone.
LAYOUT FWD, 5-PASS, 4-DOOR SEDAN
14 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
Mazda3 Dimensions
TURNING CIRCLE 34.2
CURB WEIGHT 2987 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R 61/39%
HEADROOM, F/R 38.1/37.4 in
LEGROOM, F/R 42.0/36.2 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 54.9/54.0 in
CARGO VOLUME 11.8 cu
5
7
.
9
60.2
69.3
106.3
60.2
182.1
16 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
In order to give you a better picture
of what your new car purchase might
cost in the long run, weve asked
IntelliChoice, our partner in the Motor
Trend Automotive Group, to provide
five-year cost of ownership data for
our consumer-focused Big Tests.
IntelliChoice is a recognized leader in
providing data on average depre-
ciation, fuel cost, fees, insurance,
financing, maintenance and repairs,
and more for every car on the market.
And if youre not ready to
buy one of the cars in this
comparison today, Intelli-
Choice also provides data
on used and Certified Pre-Owned
cars, so you can buy a used model in
a few years time with confidence.
Because these five vehicles are in
the same class, there are many cate-
gories in which the competitors are
1ST PLACE
Kia Forte
Handles well,
sips fuel, loaded
with exclusive
features, and
priced just right.
Whats not to like?
2ND PLACE
Mazda3
An enthusiasts
special and fuel-
sipper to boot,
weighed down by a
heavy price tag and
missing features.
3RD PLACE
Dodge Dart
Sport handling
and a long list of
features werent
enough to
overcome a high
price and terrible
gas mileage.
4TH PLACE
Honda Civic
A weak drivetrain,
middling fuel
economy, and
frustrating nav
system sank a
solid entry.
5TH PLACE
Nissan Sentra
Poor handling, poor
fuel economy, and a
shorter feature list
outweigh a low price
and big back seat.
Term Definitions from IntelliChoice
Cost of Ownership closely matched, such as taxes and
fees. Where they begin to separate
are in categories such as insurance,
depreciation, fuel, and maintenance
and repairs. The Sentra, for example,
is the most expensive to insure
but has the lowest projected fuel
cost. The Mazda3 has the highest
projected repair cost, while the
Dart suffered the largest projected
depreciation. The Forte is expected
to have the lowest maintenance and
repair costs, thanks to its generous
warranty, but its projected
fuel cost and deprecia-
tion are high. It should be
noted the all-new Fortes
projections are based on the last-
generation 2013 models data. The
Civic, with its low price and lowest
depreciation, comes out on top with
the lowest cost of ownership five
years down the road.
CHOOSE YOUR CAR WI SELY
FINANCING Assumes 10%
down payment on a 60-month
loan and an annual interest
rate of 3.89%.
FUEL U.S. Government EPA
mileage figures. Mileage is
60% highway driving, 40% city.
Fuel cost per gallon is $3.61
for unleaded regular, $3.75 for
unleaded mid-grade, $3.89 for
premium, and $3.95 for diesel,
subject to inflation of 2.90%.
Based on Energy Information
Administration U.S. 6-month
average self-service regular,
mid-grade, and premium gaso-
line and diesel prices. For the
Best Deals monthly analysis,
6-month rolling average fuel
costs are used.
MAINTENANCE Services
performed generally at manu-
facturer's suggested intervals
where stated. Other services
done at selected intervals.
Cost per service is based upon
industry-standard service times
and national labor rate aver-
ages. Parts prices are based on
manufacturer's suggested list
price where available.
INSURANCE Because of the
extreme variance in insurance
costs, the figures listed in
this report are estimates for
comparative purposes. We
assume the following: Principal
operator is under age 65; all
drivers have more than 6 years
experience with no charge-
able accidents; vehicle is for
personal use; driver lives in a
suburban/urban community;
with: collision: $500 deduct-
ible, comprehensive: $500
deductible, medical: $25,000,
property: $50,000, personal
liability: $100,000/$300,000,
uninsured driver: $25,000/
$50,000.
DEPRECIATION Based on the
assumption that you keep your
vehicle for 5 years, after which
time you sell it in a private
party transaction (not sold to a
dealer). Also assumes that the
vehicle is in good condition
with 70,000 miles (14,000
miles per year).
REPAIRS Based on extended
service contracts that will
pay for repairs for at least 5
years or 70,000 miles with 0
deductible. Service contract
pricing is adjusted down for
reasonable profit and a longer
than standard manufacturer
warranty.
AVERAGE SALES TAX A
5.50% sales tax is used as a
nationwide average; year one
title and registration fees are
included based on a state
sales weighted average.
Based on the price of the
vehicle as of January.
STATE FEES includes title and
registration fees and are based
on a sales weighted average
for all states. Registration fees
vary depending on the weight,
price, and class of the vehicle.
OWNERSHIP COSTS This is
the total cost of ownership for
this vehicle during 5 years and
70,000 miles.
PURCHASE PRICE
(INCLUDING TAX)
$25,304 $26,284 $24,324 $26,422 $27,372
AVG STATE FEES $416 $417 $409 $424 $419
DEPRECIATION $11,994 $14,272 $12,089 $13,211 $15,821
FINANCING $2323 $2411 $2231 $2425 $2511
INSURANCE $7620 $7260 $8514 $8098 $6934
FUEL $7945 $8926 $7690 $7842 $8954
MAINTANENCE $1605 $1452 $1997 $1828 $1840
REPAIRS $565 $163 $573 $671 $488
5-YEAR COST
OF OWNERSHIP
$32,468 $34,901 $33,503 $34,499 $36,968
Honda Civic EX Kia Forte EX Nissan Sentra SL
Mazda3
i Grand Touring
Dodge Dart
Limited MultiAir
PURCHASE PRICE: Target purchase price includes destination and average applicable state taxes
applied to a transaction price between invoice and retail, based on applicable incentives.
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 17
DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front engine, FWD Front engine, FWD Front engine, FWD Front engine, FWD Front engine, FWD
ENGINE TYPE turbocharged I-4, iron block/
aluminum head
I-4, aluminum
block/head
I-4, aluminum
block/head
I-4, aluminum
block/head
I-4, aluminum
block/head
VALVETRAIN SOHC, 4 valves/cyl SOHC, 4 valves/cyl DOHC, 4 valves/cyl DOHC, 4 valves/cyl DOHC, 4 valves/cyl
DISPLACEMENT 83.5 cu in/1368 cc 109.8 cu in/1799 cc 122.0 cu in/1999 cc 121.9 cu in/1998 cc 109.7 cu in/1798 cc
COMPRESSION RATIO 9.8:1 10.6:1 11.5:1 12.0:1 9.9:1
POWER (SAE NET) 160 hp @ 5500 rpm 140 hp @ 6500 rpm 173 hp @ 6500 rpm 155 hp @ 6000 rpm 130 hp @ 6000 rpm
TORQUE (SAE NET) 184 lb- @ 2500 rpm 128 lb- @ 4300 rpm 154 lb- @ 4700 rpm 148 lb- @ 4100 rpm 128 lb- @ 3600 rpm
REDLINE 6200 rpm 6700 rpm 6800 rpm 6500 rpm 6400 rpm
WEIGHT TO POWER 20.7 lb/hp 20.2 lb/hp 17.0 lb/hp 19.3 lb/hp 22.2 lb/hp
TRANSMISSION 6-speed twin-cl auto 5-speed automatic 6-speed automatic 6-speed automatic Cont variable auto
AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 4.43:1/2.75:1 4.44:1/2.33:1 3.06:1/2.37:1 3.59:1/2.15:1 3.52:1/1.93:1
SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll
bar; multilink, coil springs,
anti-roll bar
Struts, coil springs, anti-roll
bar; multilink, coil springs,
anti-roll bar
Struts, coil springs,
anti-roll bar; torsion
beam, coil springs
Struts, coil springs,
anti-roll bar; multilink,
coil springs, anti-roll bar
Struts, coil springs,
anti-roll bar; torsion
beam, coil springs
STEERING RATIO 15.0:1 14.9:1 14.5:1 16.2:1 18.6:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 3.3 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.4
BRAKES, F;R 12.0-in vented disc;
10.4-in disc, ABS
11.1-in vented disc;
10.2-in disc, ABS
11.0-in vented disc;
10.3-in disc, ABS
10.9-in vented disc;
10.4-in disc, ABS
11.0-in vented disc;
11.5-in disc, ABS
WHEELS 7.5 x 17-in, cast aluminum 6.5 x 16-in, cast aluminum 7.0 x 17-in, cast aluminum 6.5 x 16-in, cast aluminum 6.5 x 17-in, cast aluminum
TIRES 225/45R17 91H M+S
Continental ContiProContact
205/55R16 89H M+S
Continental ContiProContact
215/45R17 87H M+S
Nexen Classe Premiere
CP671
205/55R16 89H M+S
Bridgestone Turanza
EL400
205/50R17 89V
M+S Continental
ContiProContact
CONSUMER INFO
BASE PRICE $20,890 $18,955 $20,200 $23,595 $20,610
PRICE AS TESTED $26,415 $24,555 $25,610 $26,420 $23,715
STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL Yes/yes Yes/yes Yes/yes Yes/yes Yes/yes
AIRBAGS Dual front, f/r side,
f/r curtain, front knee
Dual front, front side,
f/r curtain
Dual front, front side,
f/r curtain
Dual front, front side,
f/r curtain
Dual front, front side,
f/r curtain
BASIC WARRANTY 3 yrs/36,000 mi 3 yrs/36,000 mi 5 yrs/60,000 mi 3 yrs/36,000 mi 3 yrs/36,000 mi
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 5 yrs/100,000 mi 5 yrs/60,000 mi 10 yrs/100,000 mi 5 yrs/60,000 mi 5 yrs/60,000 mi
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 yrs/100,000 mi N/A 5 yrs/60,000 mi 3 yrs/36,000 mi N/A
FUEL CAPACITY 15.8 gal 13.2 gal 13.2 gal 14.5 gal 13.2 gal
EPA CITY/HWY ECON 27/37 mpg 28/39 mpg 24/36 mpg 28/40 mpg 30/39 mpg
ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 125/91 kW-hrs/100 mi 120/86 kW-hrs/100 mi 140/94 kW-hrs/100mi 120/84 kW-hrs/100 mi 112/86 kW-hrs/100 mi
CO2 EMISSIONS 0.63 lb/mi 0.60 lb/mi 0.69 lb/mi 0.60 lb/mi 0.58 lb/mi
MT FUEL ECONOMY 19.5 mpg 23.5 mpg 24.4 mpg 25.3 mpg 21.2 mpg
RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium Unleaded regular Unleaded regular Unleaded regular Unleaded regular
2013 Dodge Dart
Limited MultiAir 2013 Honda Civic EX 2014 Kia Forte EX
2013 Mazda3
i Grand Touring 2013 Nissan Sentra SL
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS
Conclusion
Some comparison tests are blowouts, and
those are easy to judge. Then there are
tests like this, where the field is closely
matched in nearly every category. Each car
had strengths and weaknesses and none
completely ran away with the award. There
wasnt a perfect car in the bunch, but
several that would be very good choices
depending on your priorities.
If, for example, youre an enthusiast
like us, youll be happiest with the sporty
Mazda. It would also appeal to those who
value fuel economy above all else. If safety
and operating costs are priorities, youll be
comforted by the Hondas crash test scores
and low cost of ownership. Those who love
features will be happy with the Dart and
Forte, and price-conscious buyers will find
the Sentras low as-tested price appealing.
After weighing the contenders in each
category against what would best serve the
average compact car buyer, we picked the
2014 Kia Forte as the best all-around car here
and the winner of this test. Its combination
of performance, fuel efficiency, reasonable
pricing, and endless feature list had our
judges agreeing its the car wed recommend
to our friends and family. Q
18 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
Chevrolet Impala LTZ $39,505
Chrysler 300S ............ $40,625
Ford Taurus SEL ........ $33,490
Kia Cadenza ................ $41,900
Toyota Avalon Ltd. ..... $42,719
Prices as tested
LARGE SEDANS
MOTOR TREND
Words Rory Jurnecka
Photographs Jessica Walker
1 Chevrolet Impala LTZ 2 Chrysler 300S
3 Kia Cadenza 4 Ford Taurus SEL 5 Toyota Avalon Limited
THE NEWEST LARGE SEDANS TAKE ON THE OLD GUARD
Is there a more peculiar auto-
motive segment than the entry-
level, full-size sedan? Loved by
comfort-seeking retirees, client-
shuttling businessmen, and family-hauling
parents alike, the full-size sedan means many
things to many people. To us, the full-size
segment should mean comfort, interior
space, and lots of features. A step up from the
popular midsize market, these sedans are
aimed squarely at those who cant afford (or
dont want to pay for) a full-fledged luxury
platform.
The last time Motor Trend visited this space,
we pitted the Toyota Avalon (the very same one
we have here, in fact) against the new Hyundai
Azera and the aging Nissan Maxima. The
result of that comparison (Motor Trend, April
2013) was a photo finish between the Hyundai
and the Toyota, with the Avalon winning by
just a grille. Now, the Avalon is back to take
on two brand-new-to-market challengers, the
Chevrolet Impala and Kia Cadenza, along with
two recent large refreshes, the Chrysler 300S
and the Ford Taurus.
The winner will need to display superiority
through multiple criteria, including ride
comfort, interior refinement, performance,
fuel economy, safety, and value. Full-size
sedan shoppers are about as concerned
with the fun-to-drive aspect as they are
with Justin Bieber, so well put our normal
enthusiast perspectives aside for this one and
concentrate on what makes a full-size sedan
so desirable to so many people.
Ride and Handling
If youre shopping for a full-size sedan, ride
comfort is paramount. Leave the kidney-
busting, sport-tuned damping for the sport
sedansthis segment is all about a ride
that wont leave sloshed latte all over your
BUYER'S GUIDE / MOTORTREND.COM 21
Toyota Avalon
Not just heated rear
seats, but a climate-
control knob for rear
passengers, too.
Chrysler 300
The only contender
to offer heated and
cooled cupholders.
Chevrolet Impala
The touch screen
display rises to reveal
a USB input and
storage for an iPod.
Notable
Features
Kia Cadenza
An analog dash clock
and faux wood trim
make an attempt at
old-guard luxe.
Ford Taurus
The space-age center
stack is sleek and stylish.
Chrysler 300S
0-30 2.5 sec
0-40 3.6
0-50 4.9
0-60 6.4
0-70 8.3
0-80 10.6
0-90 13.0
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.0
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.85 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 26.7 sec @ 0.66 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1300 rpm
Chevrolet Impala LTZ
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 2.4 sec
0-40 3.4
0-50 4.8
0-60 6.2
0-70 8.2
0-80 10.6
0-90 13.1
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 2.9
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.83 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.1 sec @ 0.68 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1600 rpm
Ford Taurus SEL
Kia Cadenza
Toyota Avalon Ltd.
Chevrolet Impala LTZ
14.8 sec @ 96.2 mph
14.9 sec @ 97.1 mph
15.1 sec @ 95.0 mph
14.8 sec @ 95.7 mph
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.3
6.3
Chrysler 300S
14.7 sec @ 97.4 mph
business colleagues white-collared shirt.
Sad to say, a comfortable, composed ride
is something the Avalon just doesnt have,
as we noted in our last full-size comparison.
Associate editor Mike Febbo found it crashes
and bangs over the smaller bumps, then
just floats away over the bigger ones. Those
crashes and bangs also transmitted a lot of
noise through the cabin, leading to a cheap
and unrefined feel, according to executive
editor Ron Kiino. The Avalons steering
seemed artificial, though the Toyota did feel
fairly nimble on the twistier sections of our
drive route, in part because of its low 3557-
pound curb weight.
The Chrysler 300 had a firmer than average
ride as well, but managed to maintain a strong
level of comfort and composure. It rolled little
in corners and had plenty of grip, but as the
only one in the pack to tip the scales at more
than 2 tons, there was no hiding the 300s
bulk. Perhaps most disappointing was that the
Chryslers rear-drive platform didnt make it
feel much different from the rest of the front-
drivers. Around the curves, the car felt much
more nose-heavy than its best-in-test 51/49-
percent front/rear weight split would suggest.
By comparison, the 3968-pound Ford
Taurus (the second-heaviest car here) was
decidedly middle of the pack. On the road,
the Taurus is acceptable, said associate
online editor Benson Kong. The car bounces
around a bit, but it isnt uncomfortable. That
soft, floaty ride contributed to massive body
roll in corners that, when combined with
quick turn-in, tossed occupants around more
than wed like.
The Impala, while lighter on its feet than
0-60 mph Quarter Mile
22 MOTORTREND.COM / BUYER'S GUIDE
Ford Taurus SEL
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 2.5 sec
0-40 3.6
0-50 5.0
0-60 6.6
0-70 8.8
0-80 11.1
0-90 13.6
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.4
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.87 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 26.9 sec @ 0.67 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1700 rpm
Kia Cadenza
0-30 2.4 sec
0-40 3.5
0-50 4.8
0-60 6.3
0-70 8.3
0-80 10.4
0-90 13.0
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.2
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.82 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.2 sec @ 0.67 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1800 rpm
Toyota Avalon Limited
0-30 2.3 sec
0-40 3.3
0-50 4.8
0-60 6.3
0-70 8.0
0-80 10.1
0-90 12.5
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.0
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.81 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.2 sec @ 0.66 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1700 rpm
115 ft
115 ft
125 ft
118 ft
120 ft
the 300, drew fans for its American car
ridesupple and never crashy, though stable
at the same time.
Said Kong, The Impala is my pick for most
appropriate ride of the segment. Theres a bit
of a controlled heave to let you know, Hey,
the car is going to provide as plush a ride
as it can. Kiino agreed, The ride is well-
composed. Much better than Toyotas and
marginally better than Kias.
But what of the Kia? Associate online
editor Nate Martinez noted of the Cadenza,
Its extremely smooth, well-sorted,
and amazingly comfortable. While the
Kias steering lacked much feel, it wasnt
significantly worse off than most others in
the group, and body roll was minimal. Also
worth noting: The Kia drove like the smallest
car in the group, even though its larger in
every exterior dimension than the Avalon.
Performance
Fun fact: Every vehicle in this test has a dual-
overhead cam, 24-valve, 60-degree V-6 under
the hood. The greatest variance between the
smallest engine here (Kia) and the largest
(Chrysler) is a measly 16 cubic inches. Its
what the engineers did with those cubic
inches that matter.
The Avalon impressed everyone with
its smooth, punchy power delivery and a
transmission that was quick to respond,
especially in Sport. With the lightest weight
and such an eager V-6, it wasnt a surprise
when the Toyota posted the top quarter-mile
time of the group. The 3.5-liter V-6 is the best
part of this car, said Kong. We didnt even
regret not having manual gear selection.
Kias Cadenza also impressed with its eager
3.3-liter mill and paddle-shiftable six-speed
auto. Though only midpack on output with
293 hp on tap, the Kia tied for second-quickest
quarter-mile time with the most powerful car
in the group: the 305-hp Chevy Impala. On
the road, both cars felt plenty quick merging
into busy freeway traffic, but on winding,
hilly roads, the Chevys transmission hunted
endlessly for the proper gear, resulting in
frustration and a lot of engine noise. Manual
mode is an option, but per Kiino, The toggle
buttons arent the quickest or easiest to use.
Give me paddles!
Most editors found the Kias shift paddles
well-placed, but thought downshifts were
a little slow to arrive, while upshifts were
usually quick.
The only other car in this pack to offer
paddle shifters was the Chrysler 300S.
Feedback was generally positive for the 300s
3.6-liter Pentastar engine and adjoining eight-
speed automatic. Though the Chrysler was the
heaviest car of the group, it trailed the Avalon
by just 0.2 second in the quarter mile and did
it with a burly rumble from its exhaust. The
300 also earned praise from Kiino for its quick-
acting gearbox. The eight-speed is sweet
Braking 60-0
The Impala drew fans for its plush American car ride over rough stretches of road.
Chevrolet Impala LTX Dimensions
TURNING CIRCLE 38.8
CURB WEIGHT 3855 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R 59/41%
HEADROOM, F/R 39.9/37.4 in
LEGROOM, F/R 45.8/39.8 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 57.9/56.9 in
CARGO VOLUME 18.8 cu
62.2
73.0
111.7
62.0
201.3
5
8
.
9
TechLiner
/other
devices, even with voice commands, when it is safe to do so. Some features may be locked out while the vehicle is
in gear. Not all features are compatible with all phones. SYNC Services is available on most vehicles and may
require a subscription. Traf c alerts and turn-by-turn directions available in select markets. Message and data
rates may apply. Ford Motor Company reserves the right to change or discontinue this product service at any time
without prior notication or incurring any future obligation.
Hands-free calling is just one of the voice-activated ways over 5 million Ford owners
use SYNC
*
to take a road trip. Just say the word, and SYNC can help you do almost
everything. Except pack. Drive connected at ford.com/sync.
PACK
CHECK VEHICLE HEALTH
SEND DIRECTIONS TO SYNC
Front Brakes
Magnetic Ride Control
Head-up Display
cadillac.com/XTS
YOU DON T START I T.
YOU UNLEASH IT.
* Vsport models only.
2013 General Motors. All rights reserved. Cadillac
XTS.