N G Hi ngorani El ectri c Power Research I nsti tute, USA For economic reasons most i f not al l of the worl ds el ectri c power suppl y are wi del y i nterconnected, i nvol vi ng i nterconnecti ons i nsi de uti l i ti es own ter r i tor i es which extend t o i nter- uti l i ty i nterconnecti ons and then t o i nter- regi onal s. we need these i nterconnecti ons because apart from del i very, the purpose of the transmi ssi on network i s t o pool power pl ants and l oad centers, i n order t o mi ni mi ze the number of power generati on sources needed, taki ng advantage of di versi ty of l oads, avai l abi l i ty of sources and f uel i n order t o suppl y the l oad at a requi red r el i abi l i ty. I f we j ust had radi al l i nes, we would need many more generati on resources t o serve the l oad wi th the same rel i abi l i ty. I f you l ook at it that way, transmi ssi on i s an al ternati ve t o a new generati on resource. L ess transmi ssi on capabi l i ty means that more generati on resources would be requi red regardl ess of whether we have l arge or s mal l power pl ants. No one i s real l y sure about what the optimum bal ance i s because of l ack of avai l abl e methodology that would enabl e the system pl anner t o i ntegrate transmi ssi on i nto an i ntegrated val ue-based resource pl anni ng. Economic consi derati ons would suggest that adequate transmi ssi on i nterconnecti ons shoul d be provi ded t o accommodate al l economic energy/capaci ty i nterchanges subj ect t o trade of f between new generati on and the cost of transmi ssi on. Often as power transf ers grow, the power system becomes i ncreasi ngl y more complex t o operate and the system can become more i nsecure wi th l arge power fl ows wi th i nadequate control and i nabi l i ty t o uti l i ze the f ul l potenti al of transmi ssi on i nterconnecti ons. With thi s i n mind, the El ectri c Power Research I nsti tute representi ng the col l aborati ve RhD arm of the US uti l i ti es, has put forward a concept, a vi si on of the f uture based on si l i con sci ence, cal l ed Fl exi bl e AC Transmi ssi on System (FACTS). I t has been di scussed through publ i cati ons (1-91, i n speeches at I EEE meeti ngs, forums, workshops, CI GRE, vari ous uti l i ti es and most recentl y at a hi ghl y successf ul I nternati onal Conference i n Ci nci nnati i n September 1990, organi zed by EPRI . The concept was f i r st menti oned i n the EPRI J ournal i n 1986 (l ), then at a l uncheon speech duri ng the I EEE PES Summer meeti ng i n San Franci sco ( 2 ) i n J ul y 1987 and at a l uncheon speech at the 1988 American Power Conference ( 3) . While some of the rel evant technol ogy i . e. , Stati c VAR Compensation i s al ready i n wide use, the FACTS concept has brought t o the tabl e a tremendous potenti al f or thyri stor based control l ers which w i l l surel y revol uti oni ze the power system. The technol ogy of f ers the uti l i ti es the abi l i ty t o: 1. Control power fl ows on thei r 2. Allow secure l oadi ng of transmi ssi on transmi ssi on routes l i nes t o thei r f ul l thermal capaci ty. FACTS technol ogy, whi l e al l owi ng use of transmi ssi on t o i ts thermal capaci ty, does not do away wi th the need f or addi ti onal transmi ssi on l i nes or the upgradi ng of exi sti ng l i nes where thermal l i mi t s have been reached or when eval uati on of l osses added t o the cost of FACTS technol ogy shows that new l i nes or upgradi ng of exi sti ng l i nes i s the most optimum answer. Al so, FACTS technol ogy cal l s f or new thi nki ng on col l aborati ve operati on and pl anni ng among uti l i ti es because of the possi bi l i ti es that the di f f erent owners of an i ntegrated power system coul d be i mpl ementi ng contradi ctory control el ements. However, one would expect that mutual i nterest w i l l ensure the most optimum use of the power system as a whol e. The central technol ogy of FACTS i nvol ves hi gh power el ectroni cs, a vari ety of thyri stor devi ces f or appl i cati on i n f uture years, supported by advances i n di gi tal protecti ve rel ays, di gi tal control s, i ntegrated communications ( 10) and advanced control centers. So what i s the i ssue? I f you thi nk about the power systems of today, by and l arge they are mechani cal l y control l ed. A l l the el ectroni cs and hi gh speed communication are at ground l evel , but at the hi gh vol tage end where the f i nal acti on i s taken, the devi ces are mechani cal and there i s l i t t l e hi gh speed control . With mechani cal devi ces, control cannot be i ni ti ated f requentl y because mechani cal devi ces tend t o wear out very qui ckl y compared t o stati c devi ces. I n ef f ect, from the dynamic as wel l as steady state poi nt of view, the system i s real l y uncontrol l ed and power system pl anners, operators and engi neers have l earned t o l i ve wi th thi s f act and they use al l ki nds of i ngenui ty t o make it work ef f ecti vel y, but not wi thout a pri ce. Consi der power fl ow over an ac l i ne, Fi gure 1. I t i s a f uncti on of phase angl e, l i ne end vol tages and l i ne impedance and there i s no hi gh speed control over any of these parameters. Somehow, the operators arri ve at the requi red steady state power fl ow, whi l e mai ntai ni ng vol tages and phase angl es wi thi n saf e tol erabl e l i mi t s , that i s wel l below the peak stabi l i ty l i mi t s of the power system, through the use of generati on schedul i ng, the occasi onal changi ng of power transformer taps and the swi tchi ng of shunt reactors and 2 capaci t or s. The consequences of t hi s l ack of f ast , r el i abl e cont r ol ar e st abi l i t y pr obl ems, power f l owi ng t hr ough ot her t han t he i nt ended l i nes, t he i nabi l i t y t o f ul l y ut i l i ze t he t r ansmi ssi on r esour ces t o t hei r t her mal and/ or economi c l i mi t s, undesi r abl e VAR f l ows, hi gher l osses, hi gh or l owvol t ages, cascade t r i ppi ng and l ong r est or at i on t i mes. We have been br ought up t o t hi nk t hat t hese ar e i nher ent pr obl ems of t he power syst ems and t hat ' s why i t i s necessar y t o have a f r esh l ook based on new t echnol ogi cal oppor t uni t i es. The cent er col umn i n Fi gur e 2 shows t ypi cal Sur ge I mpedance Loadi ng ( SI L) val ues of t he di f f er ent cl asses of 60 HZ over head t r ansmi ssi on l i nes. They ar e much l ower t han t he t ypi cal t her mal l i mi t s shown i n t he r i ght hand col umn. Many t r ansmi ssi on l i nes ar e not sui t abl e f or l oadi ng much above t hei r sur ge i mpedance l oadi ng val ue because of t he pr obl ems of power and vol t age i nst abi l i t y t hat we have l ear ned t o l i ve wi t h. Basi cal l y t hi s i s because t he ac syst emi s mechani cal l y cont r ol l ed, whi ch f r omt he dynami cs poi nt of vi ew i s uncont r ol l ed. Fi gur e 3 shows AC Power Fl ow i n Two Par al l el Pat hs. Wi t hout any cont r ol , power f l owi s pr opor t i onal t o t he i nver se of t he var i ous t r ansmi ssi on l i ne i mpedances. I t i s l i kel y t hat t he l ower i mpedance l i ne may become over l oaded. Al so, t her e i s no concer n f or t r ansmi ssi on lis owner shi p and hence t her e i s no i ncent i ve t o upgr ade t r ansmi ssi on l i ne capaci t y. Thus we don' t even have good cont r ol over di r ect i ng t he st eady st at e power f l ows, agai n because t he ac syst emi s mechani cal l y cont r ol l ed. Fi gur e 4 shows AC and HVDC l i nes i n par al l el . Wi t h HVDC, power f l ows as or der ed by t he owner because, wi t h conver t er s, power i s el ect r oni cal l y cont r ol l ed. Al so, because power i s el ect r oni cal l y cont r ol l ed, an HVDC l i ne can be used t o i t s f ul l t her mal capaci t y i f adequat e conver t er capaci t y i s pr ovi ded. Fur t her mor e, an HVDC l i ne because of i t s hi gh speed cont r ol can al so hel p t he par al l el ac t r ansmi ssi on l i ne t o mai nt ai n st abi l i t y. However , HVDC i s t oo expensi ve f or wi despr ead use and i s usual l y consi der ed when l ong t r ansmi ssi on l i nes ar e i nvol ved or f or asynchr onous t i es. Fi gur e 5 shows one of t he t r ansmi ssi on l i nes coul d addi t i onal i mpedance i n t he f or mof a hi gh speed cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or . Wi t h t hi s ar r angement , one can obt ai n subst ant i al l y ( but not compl et el y) t he same advant ages as wi t h HVDC but at a much l ower cost . Thi s i s because wi t h hi gh speed cont r ol of ser i es i mpedance one can obt ai n appr opr i at e st eady st at e power ( wi t hi n t he r ange of i mpedance cont r ol ) yet change/ modul at e i mpedance as r api dl y as r equi r ed f or st abi l i t y consi der at i ons. Fi gur e 5 al so shows t hat one of t he AC l i nes may have a hi gh- speed phase angl e r egul at or . Agai n, wi t h t hi s appr oach one can obt ai n subst ant i al l y t he same advant ages as HVDC, but wi t h l ess cost . Wher eas t he ser i es capaci t or cont r ol s t he i mpedance t o l evel s bel ow t he ser i es i nduct ance of t he l i ne, t he phase angl e r egul at or wi t h pl us- mi nus r ange, cont r ol s t he appar ent i mpedance bot h ways. The HVDC l i nk i n ef f ect , i s an el ect r oni c 360 degr ee phase angl e r egul at or . Thi s l eads us t o t he FACTS concept whi ch i nvol ves t he use of t hyr i st or based cont r ol l er s, Fi gur e 6. Appl i cat i on of 1, 2, or 3 of t hese cont r ol l er s, sel ect ed on a case by case basi s can enhance any speci f i c t r ansmi ssi on l i ne and al so can hel p t o enhance st abi l i t y of l i nes near by. The t wo cont r ol l er s l i st ed at t he t op of t he l ef t hand col umn, t he SSR Dampi ng ( r equi r ed f or ser i es capaci t or compensat i on) ( 6 ) , and t he St at i c VAR Compensat or , ar e avai l abl e t oday. EPRI pl ans t o f ur t her advance t hese and t o hel p devel op t he next 4 or 5 l i st ed cont r ol l er s i n t he l ef t hand col umn over t he next 10 year s. EPRI ' s pr i mar y r ol e i s t o be a cat al yst , put money onl y wher e essent i al t o br i dge t he gap of doubt about commer ci al vi abi l i t y as wel l as t o hel p cr eat e t he mar ket and t echnol ogy. Ther e i s now a wor l dwi de i nt er est i n FACTS and i t i s f ul l y expect ed t hat ot her s al ong wi t h EPRI wi l l get i nvol ved i n var i ous aspect s of FACTS. I get t he i mpr essi on t hat pl anner s ar e t he most exci t ed. usual l y t hey ar e ver y conser vat i ve and r i ght f ul l y so, but f or t he f i r st t i me i n a l ong t i me t hey see an i magi nat i ve concept and t hey l i ke what t hey see. basi s, sever al manuf act ur er s i ncl udi ng GE, ABB, GEC Al st hom, and Si emens have expr essed i nt er est i n FACTS. Ther e i s si gni f i cant i nt er est among U. S. ut i l i t i es. Al so, EdF of Fr ance, ENEL of I t al y, NGCo. of Engl and, FURNAS of Br azi l and ut i l i t i es i n I ndi a, have expr essed an i nt er est i n t hi s t echnol ogy. I EEE and CI GRE have st ar t ed Wor ki ng Gr oups t o l ook at var i ous aspect s of FACTS t echnol ogy. Pl anner s want pl anni ng t ool s t o use f or t hei r own condi t i ons of pl anni ng, and t o t ake advant age of t he var i ous oppor t uni t i es of f er ed by FACTS. So EPRI has i ncor por at ed key FACTS cont r ol l er s i n i t s pl anni ng and desi gn comput er pr ogr ams, i ncl udi ng Ext ended Mi d- t er m St abi l i t y, Smal l Si gnal St abi l i t y, Load Fl ow and EMTP. Under EPRI pr oj ect s, GE and PTI have al so i ncor por at ed FACTS i n t hei r comput er pr ogr ams. EPRI sponsor ed t wo st udi es of maj or cor r i dor s, one wi t h GE ( 7) and t he ot her wi t h PTI ( E) , wi t h r eal i st i c but f i ct i t i ous syst ems. Fi gur e 7 shows t hat wi t h var i ous combi nat i ons of FACTS cont r ol l er s, i t was possi bl e t o On a wor l dwi de 3 i ncr ease t he useabl e capaci t y f r om5, 000 MW, by di f f er ent amount s up t o i t s t her mal l i mi t whi ch was al most doubl e t he l oadi ng l i mi t f or t he r equi r ed r el i abi l i t y. Fi gur e 8 shows a r el at i vel y si mpl e case of r adi al t r ansmi ssi on ( wi t h under l yi ng l ower vol t age ci r cui t s) f or whi ch capaci t y coul d be i ncr eased f r om2, 000 MW wi t h f i xed ser i es compensat i on t o 2, 800 MW wi t h t he addi t i on of modest var i abl e ser i es compensat i on or t o 2, 500 MWwi t h t he addi t i on of a dynami c br ake. Because of t he hi gh i nt er est and t he need f or addi t i onal st udi es, EPRI has now under t aken wor k t o st udy sever al r eal syst emappl i cat i ons. I t was ment i oned ear l i er t hat t wo of t he cont r ol l er s ar e al r eady avai l abl e, t he st at i c VAR compensat or ( SVC) and SSR dampi ng scheme ( 6 ) . EPRI demonst r at ed t he st at i c VAR compensat or ( SVC) i n 1985 on t he Mi nnesot a Power syst emf or vol t age and st abi l i t y cont r ol , Fi gur e 9. St at i c VAR compensat or s, bot h i nduct i ve and capaci t i ve ar e wi del y used t hr oughout t he wor l d. A mor e advanced ver si on of t he SVC based on t hyr i st or s wi t h t ur n of f capabi l i t y ( 9) shoul d become economi cal l y vi abl e i n about 5 t o 10 year s and wi del y used beyond t he year 2000. Thi s advanced SVC can del i ver bot h l eadi ng and l aggi ng r eact i ve power and i t s over l oad capabi l i t y i s not vol t age dependent as i s t he case wi t h pr esent svcs. Wi t h Si emens and Sout her n Cal i f or ni a Edi son col l abor at i on, EPRI demonst r at ed a t hyr i st or based NGH- SSR dampi ng scheme ( 6) on t he Sout her n Cal i f or ni a Edi son ( SCE) syst em6 year s ago, Fi gur e 10. Thi s i nvol ves a t hyr i st or swi t ch acr oss a capaci t or whi ch al so has t he capabi l i t y t o pr ot ect , bypass and i nser t ser i es capaci t ance and damp subsynchr onous osci l l at i ons. The onl y t hi ng l acki ng f or t he t echnol ogy t o be sui t abl e f or a t hyr i st or cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or t hat woul d be used f or i mpedance cont r ol i s t hat t he t hyr i st or s do not have act i ve cool i ng and, t her ef or e, ar e not capabl e of car r yi ng t he f ul l l oad cur r ent cont i nuousl y. Wor ki ng wi t h GE and BPA, EPRI pl ans t o demonst r at e t he t hyr i st or cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or f or t r ansmi ssi on l i ne i mpedance cont r ol , Fi gur e 11, whi ch i s expect ed t o be commer ci al l y avai l abl e i n about 3 year s. Thi s i s a key FACTS cont r ol l er , t hus we can say t hat soon we shoul d be abl e t o begi n t he i mpl ement at i on of t he FACTS concept . Si emens/ Noki a i s wor ki ng wi t h West er n Ar ea Power Admi ni st r at i on ( 10) t o devel op and demonst r at e a cont i nuousl y var i abl e ser i es capaci t or compensat i on modul e i nvol vi ng J ohn Vi t hayat hi l s i dea (11) of connect i ng a t hyr i st or cont r ol l ed ser i es r eact or i n par al l el wi t h t he capaci t or of 15 ohms i n a 230 kV, 1000 A t r ansmi ssi on l i ne. ABB i s wor ki ng wi t h Amer i can El ect r i c Power (12) t o devel op and t est a pr ot ot ype 3000 A t hyr i st or val ve al ong wi t h cont r ol pr ot ect i on ci r cui t s, acr oss one phase of a 7 ohmser i es capaci t or modul e. Thi s i s expect ed t o l ead t o a f ul l t hr ee phase i nst al l at i on. EPRI i s al so i nvest i gat i ng Laszl o Gyugyi s i nt er est i ng concept s (13) based on t hyr i st or s wi t h t ur n of f capabi l i t y, whi ch i nvol ve use of al l sol i d- st at e modul ar conver t er s f or use as st at i c VAR compensat or s, cont r ol l er ser i es compensat or s and phase t hyr i st or s. Cl ear l y t her e i s a l ot of i nt er est , a sor t of caut i ous exci t ement wi t h a possi bi l i t y of a huge mar ket much gr eat er t han HVDC. EPRI i s al so wor ki ng on i ncor por at i ng FACTS cont r ol l er s i n Cont r ol Cent er s, whi ch wi l l have t o deal wi t h ci r cui t s wi t h r api dl y var i abl e l i ne i mpedances, phase angl es, VAR compensat i on, et c. As st udi es ar e car r i ed out , new and i nt er est i ng f i ndi ngs ar e emer gi ng. Some of t hese ar e: As f ar as SSR pr obl ems i s concer ned, i t can be gener al i zed t hat any hi gh speed cont r ol l er act i ons i n power syst ems, i . e. gener at or exci t at i on cont r ol , HVDC, FACTS cont r ol l er s can exci t e/ enhance i nher ent osci l l at i ons i f i mpr oper l y desi gned. Conver sel y al l such cont r ol l er s can damp such osci l l at i ons. Gi ven t he knowl edge al r eady acqui r ed about SSR, i t i s now bel i eved t hat t hi s pr obl emcan be easi l y t aken car e of . Thyr i st or - cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or can ser ve essent i al l y t he same pur pose as a phase angl e r egul at or i f one si ded i mpedance cont r ol wi l l meet t he needs. Thyr i st or - cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or wi l l t hen be a pr ef er r ed sol ut i on because i t wi l l have consi der abl y l ower cost t han a phase angl e r egul at or . However , i f power f r omt he l i ne i s t o be pushed out , a phase angl e r egul at or wi t h pl us and mi nus r ange woul d be r equi r ed. Thi s, however , does r ai se t he quest i on of r el at i ve cost and per f or mance of addi ng bot h t hyr i st or - cont r ol l ed ser i es r eact or and t hyr i st or - cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or i n t he same l i ne, compar ed t o t he phase angl e r egul at or . GE st udy f or EPRI showed t hat t o i ncr ease t he st eady st at e st abi l i t y l i mi t , t he t ot al si ze of ser i es capaci t or r equi r ed i s consi der abl y l ess i f par t of t he capaci t or i s cont r ol l ed, t hus r esul t i ng i n pot ent i al of f set t i ng cost . I t i s al so appar ent t hat base component t echnol ogy i s avai l abl e and no maj or 4 br eakt hr oughs ar e r equi r ed. Never t hel ess, i mpr ovement s i n component t echnol ogy wi l l i ncr ease t he mar ket pot ent i al of FACTS. - I t was ment i oned ear l i er t hat pl anni ng t ool s f or FACTS st udi es ar e avai l abl e. TWO of t he cont r ol l er s ar e al so avai l abl e now, i . e. , t he SSR damper and st at i c VAR compensat or . Al so, SSR dampi ng can be i ncor por at ed i n most FACTS cont r ol l er s. The most i mpor t ant cont r ol l er , t he t hyr i st or - cont r ol l ed ser i es capaci t or and cor r espondi ng cont r ol and pr ot ect i on syst ems shoul d be commer ci al l y avai l abl e wi t hi n 3 year s. of t he appl i cat i on of FACTS t echnol ogy t o power syst ems. I t wi l l be pr ogr essi vel y appl i ed on case by case basi s, on a r et r of i t and i ncr ement al modul ar basi s t o r emove t r ansmi ssi on syst embot t l enecks. As ment i oned bef or e, t hi s t echnol ogy, whi l e decr easi ng t he need f or t r ansmi ssi on l i nes, does not do away wi t h t he need f or some addi t i onal t r ansmi ssi on l i nes or t he upgr adi ng of exi st i ng l i nes wher e t her mal l i mi t s have been r eached or wher e eval uat i on of l osses added t o t he cost of FACTS t echnol ogy shows t hat new l i nes or upgr adi ng of exi st i ng l i nes i s t he most opt i mumanswer . As advances i n t hyr i st or t echnol ogy t ake pl ace, and cont r ol l er concept s ar e f ur t her advanced and new ones i nvent ed, t he cost of FACTS cont r ol l er s wi l l decr ease. Lar ge scal e use of FACTS t echnol ogy i s an assur ed l ong t er mscenar i o. Over a 20 year t i me f r ame, as mor e and mor e el ect r oni c cont r ol l er s assume t hei r pl ace on ut i l i t y syst ems, ut i l i t i es wi l l i ncr easi ngl y per cei ve t hat t hei r power syst ems ar e bei ng el ect r oni cal l y cont r ol l ed. Thi s i s al so when t hey wi l l get t he f eel i ng t hat maj or out ages ar e a t hi ng of t he past because t he syst emhas become r obust enough t o el i mi nat e cascade out ages. No one can name t he pr eci se moment when FACTS wi l l per vade ut i l i t y power syst ems, but gi ven t he ent husi asmwi t h whi ch t he FACTS concept has been r ecei ved, par t i cul ar l y by t he seni or management and syst empl anner s i n ut i l i t i es, i t woul d now seemt o be i nevi t abl e. REFERENCES That poi nt wi l l be t he t r ue begi nni ng 1. EPRI JO- ( Avai l abl e f r omEPRI on r equest ) . 2 . N. G. Hi ngor ani , "Fut ur e Oppor t uni t i es f or El ect r i c Power Syst ems, " Luncheon Speech, I EEE PES Summer Power Meet i ng, San Fr anci sco, CA, J ul y 14, 1987 ( avai l abl e f r omaut hor on r equest ) . 3. N. G. Hi ngor ani , "Hi gh Power El ect r oni cs and Fl exi bl e AC Tr ansmi ssi on Syst em", J oi nt APC/ I EEE Luncheon Speech, Apr i l 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 1988 at t he Amer i can Power Conf er ence 50t h Annual Meet i ng i n Chi cago. i n 1988. Pr i nt ed -, J ul y . . N. G. Hi ngor ani , "Power El ect r oni cs i n El ect r i c Ut i l i t i es: Rol e of Power El ect r oni cs i n Fut ur e Power Syst ems. " I nvi t ed Paper , sue Vo1. -s 76, No. of 4, t he Apr i l LEEE 1988. N. G. Hi ngor ani , H. Meht a, S. Levy, V. A. K. Templ e, H. H. Gl ascock, "Resear ch Coor di nat i on f or Power Semi conduct or Technol ogy, " - di nas of t he I E 11. NO. 9, Sept ember 1989. N. G. Hi ngor ani , B. Bhar gava, R. A. Hedi n, K. B. St ump, "NGH Dampi ng Devi ce Sol ves Subsynchr onous Resonance Pr obl em, " Vol . 5. No. 1, Mar ch 1986. G. D. Br euer , "Fl exi bl e AC Tr ansmi ssi on Scopi ng St udi es, " D. N. Ewar t , R. J . Koessl er , J . D. Mount f or d, D. Mar at ukul am, "I nvest i gat i on of FACTS Opt i ons t o Ut i l i ze t he Ful l DRI Ther mal Wo- Capaci t y on of FACTS, AC Tr ansmi ssi on", November 14- 16, 1990, Ci nci nnat i , Ohi o. L. Gyugyi , N. Hi ngor ani , P. Nanner y, N. Tai , "Advanced St at i c VAR Compensat or Usi ng Gat e Tur n- Of f Thyr i st or s f or Ut i l i t y Appl i cat i ons, " CI GRE Paper 23- 203, 1990 Sessi on, Par i s. A. H. Mont oya, D. R . Tor ger son, B. A. Vossl er , W. Fel dmann, G. J uet t e, K. Sadek, A. Schul t z. "230 kV Advanced Ser i es Compensat i on, Kayent a Subst at i on - Pr oj ect Over vi ew", EPRI Wor kshow on FACTS. November 14- 16, 1990, Ci nci nnat i , Ohi o. J . J . Vi t hayat hi l , C. W. Tayl or , M. Kl i nger , W. A. Mi t t el st adt , "Case St udi es of Convent i onal and Novel Met hods Of React i ve Power Cont r ol on an AC Tr ansmi ssi on Syst em", EE VO1, v and ~aris 1988. R. M. Mal i szewski , 8. M. Past er nack, H. N. Scher er J r . , M. Chami a, H. Fr ank, L. Paul sson, I nt er connect ed er 27- 30?. Tr ansmi ssi on 1990 Session, Net wor k", Par i s. L. Gyugyi , "Sol i d St at e Cont r ol of AC Power Tr ansmi ssi on' ' , FACTS. November 14- 16, 1990, Ci nci nnat i , Ohi o. "Power Fl ow Cont r ol i n a Hi ghl y 5 FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System EPRl msul l Power Flow c.m. FACTS - FlexiMe AC Transmission System EPRI ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ AC Power Flow - Parallel Paths - FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System Power Flow Control EPRl a211 om-. HVDC Line - FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System Power Flow Control EPRl Power. 112 M 8s desred impedance. 2X - .. FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System Power Flow Control EPRl F i gure 3 Series Capacitor or Phase Angle Regulator - F i gure 4 * SSR damping . Static VAR compensator - Series reactor Fault current limiter Series capacitor 1 Circuit breaker Static condenser 1 Ferroresonance damper Dynamic load brake Dynamic voltage limiter 9 Phase angle regulator Load tap changer FACTS - Flexible AC Transmisslon System Thyristor Based Controllers EPRl F i gure 6 6 n... Corridor System - 300 Miles Radial System- 500 Miles Adsbald Mw MW " : I Vwm FACTSopm t m *yY) ease 3000 25M) 2000 1500 (sooOrm) .RWSans.Mhbls mFuedSans n W .W cmp s mc mp comp salmcmp ssnescanp - 30% Flxed 30% Fixed - 30% Fixed FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System Maximizing Power Transfer EPRl Figure 7 Series Comp Series Comp Series Comp . 10%Variable Series Camp m Dymmic Brake FACTS - Flexible AC Transmission System Maximizing Power Transfer EPRl Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 7 High Voltage Platform Equipment Protection FACTS : Thy r i s t o r Con t r o I I e d S e r i e s 075103 Compensation Figure 11