1

Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer

http://answering-islam.org

Sam Shamoun

Question:

Many Christians quote Matthew 28:19 to show that Jesus taught that God is a
Trinity. Yet this Trinitarian Baptismal formula cannot be found in any MS of the
Gospel of Matthew until the fourth century. Doesn’t this therefore prove that this
verse was later inserted into the text of Matthew in order to establish a biblical basis
for the doctrine of the Trinity as well as for the decisions arrived at by the bishops
at the Council of Nicaea?

Answer:

Here is the verse that we will be examining:

"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,"

The question assumes that there are complete copies of Matthew, or copies that contain
Matthew 28, which omit this verse prior to the fourth century. It further assumes that this
formula is somehow unattested in the writings of the Christians prior to that time as well.
In light of this we turn our attention to the extant manuscripts (MSS) of Matthew that
were written before or during the fourth century.

The MSS Evidence

It needs to be stated that we simply do not have any extant manuscript (MS) which
contains all of Matthew dating prior to the fourth century. Nor do we find any MS prior
to this time that contains Matthew 28.

For instance, the listing of the papyri as found in Kurt and Barbara Aland's The Text of
the New Testament (2nd Edition, 1995, pp. 96-103) gives a description of the verses
contained in each of the 96 papyri. In P 37 Matthew 26:52 seems to be the last verse from
Matthew found in the papyri. Philip Comfort and David Barrett, in their book, The
Complete Text of the Earliest New Testament Manuscripts (1999, pp. 6 & 13) mention
some of the MSS of Matthew. On page 6 they present a list of the various verses from
Matthew (with Matthew also ending at 26:52), and on page 13, they say that they were
providing only those manuscripts which, "dated from the early second century to the
beginning of the fourth (A.D. 100-300)."

In fact, here is a list of Papyri from the second to fourth centuries that contain Matthew:
1
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 2
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
P 64, c. 200 – Matt. 3, 5, 26
P.104/ P Oxy. (Oxyrhynchus Papyri) 4404, late 2nd Cent. – Matt. 21
P 77/ P.Oxy. 2683, 2nd-3rd Cent. – Matt 23
P 103/ P.Oxy. 4403, 2nd- 3rd Cent. – Matt. 13-14
P 1/ P Oxy., 3rd Cent. – Matt. 1
P 101/ P Oxy. 4401, 3rd Cent. – Matt. 3-4
P 70/ P Oxy. 2384, 3rd Cent. – Matt 2-3, 11-12, 24
P 45, 3rd Cent. - Matt. 20-21, 25
P 53, 3rd Cent. - Matt. 26
P 102/ P Oxy. 4402, 3rd– 4th Cent. – Matt. 4
P 37, 3rd-4th – Matt. 26
P 71/ P Oxy. 2385, 4th Cent. – Matt 19
P 62, 4th Cent. - Matt. 11
P 86, 4th Cent. – Matt. 5
P 35, 4th Cent.(?) – Matt. 25
P 25, late 4th Cent. – Matt. 18-19
P 19/P Oxy. 1170, 4th-5th Cent. – Matt. 10-11
P 21/P Oxy. 1227, 4th-5th Cent.- Matt. 12 (Source)

Thus, we do not find any MS of Matthew which is complete or that contains chapter 28
prior to the fourth century. On what basis, then, can anyone claim that the original Gospel
of Matthew did not contain 28:19 when WE HAVE NO COMPLETE GOSPEL OF
MATTHEW WHICH HAS CHAPTER 28 prior to the fourth century?

Now someone may interject at this point and claim that since no complete MS exists of
Matthew how can we therefore be sure that this Gospel did in fact contain 28:19? This
leads us to our second point.

The Patristic Evidence

There is plenty of evidence from the writings of the early Church Fathers, from the
disciples of the Apostles and their subsequent successors, that this Trinitarian formula
was being used and that it formed part of the Gospel of Matthew. In fact, this command
was so well known that many writers alluded to it without naming the specific Gospel
from which they were quoting What this shows is that these Christians assumed that their
readers were so familiar with this formula, and already knew in which of the four Gospels
this instruction could be found, that they didn’t feel the need to specify the source.

Here, we will take a look at a few examples from these early Christian writings, all of
which predate the fourth century.

Didache - Teaching of the Twelve Apostles

2
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 3
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
Here is some historical background regarding the Didache so that the readers can
appreciate the importance of this document:

Since it was discovered in a monastery in Constantinople and published by P. Bryennios

in 1883, the Didache or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles has continued to be one of the
most disputed of early Christian texts. It has been depicted by scholars as anything
between the original of the Apostolic Decree (c. 50 AD) and a late archaising fiction of
the early third century. It bears no date itself, nor does it make reference to any datable
external event, yet the picture of the Church which it presents could only be described as
primitive, reaching back to the very earliest stages of the Church's order and practice in a
way which largely agrees with the picture presented by the NT, while at the same time
posing questions for many traditional interpretations of this first period of the Church's
life. Fragments of the Didache were found at Oxyrhyncus (P. Oxy 1782) from the fourth
century and in coptic translation (P. Lond. Or. 9271) from 3/4th century. Traces of the
use of this text, and the high regard it enjoyed, are widespread in the literature of the
second and third centuries especially in Syria and Egypt. It was used by the compilator of
the Didascalia (C 2/3rd) and the Liber Graduun (C 3/4th), as well as being absorbed in
toto by the Apostolic Constitutions (C c. 3/4th, abbreviated as Ca) and partially by
various Egyptian and Ethiopian Church Orders, after which it ceased to circulate
independently. Athanasius describes it as 'appointed by the Fathers to be read by those
who newly join us, and who wish for instruction in the word of goodness' [Festal Letter
39:7]. Hence a date for the Didache in its present form later than the second century must
be considered unlikely, and a date before the end of the first century probable. (Jonathan
Draper, Gospel Perspectives, v. 5, p. 269)

He then states in a footnote (op. cit., p. 284), "A new consensus is emerging for a date c.
100 AD." (Source)

This document twice alludes to the Matthean Baptismal formula, serving as an

independent witness that this formula was known and in use by the early Church:

Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism. And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having
first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of
the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water;
and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out
water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But
before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whoever else can; but you
shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before. (Roberts-Donaldson translation;
source)

Here is another translation of this same passage:

7:1 But concerning baptism, thus shall ye baptize.

7:2 Having first recited all these things, baptize {in the name of the Father and of the
Son and of the Holy Spirit} in living (running) water.
3
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 4
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
7:3 But if thou hast not living water, then baptize in other water;
7:4 and if thou art not able in cold, then in warm.
7:5 But if thou hast neither, then pour water on the head thrice in the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
7:6 But before the baptism let him that baptizeth and him that is baptized fast, and any
others also who are able;
7:7 and thou shalt order him that is baptized to fast a day or two before. (J.B. Lightfoot’s
translation; source)

Ignatius of Antioch (ca. AD. 107-112)

Chapter IX.-The Old Testament is Good: the New Testament is Better.

… The priests indeed, and the ministers of the word, are good; but the High Priest is
better, to whom the holy of holies has been committed, and who alone has been entrusted
with the secrets of God. The ministering powers of God are good. The Comforter is holy,
and the Word is holy, the Son of the Father, by whom He made all things, and exercises a
providence over them all. This is the Way which leads to the Father, the Rock, the
Defence, the Key, the Shepherd, the Sacrifice, the Door of knowledge, through which
have entered Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, Moses and all the company of the prophets,
and these pillars of the world, the apostles, and the spouse of Christ, on whose account
He poured out His own blood, as her marriage portion, that He might redeem her. All
these things tend towards the unity of the one and only true God. But the Gospel
possesses something transcendent [above the former dispensation], viz. the appearing of
our Saviour Jesus Christ, His passion, and the resurrection itself. For those things which
the prophets announced, saying, "Until He come for whom it is reserved, and He shall be
the expectation of the Gentiles," have been fulfilled in the Gospel, [our Lord saying,]
"Go ye and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Ghost." All then are good together, the law, the prophets, the
apostles, the whole company [of others] that have believed through them: only if we love
one another. (Epistle of Ignatius to the Philadelphians; source)

Chapter II.-Unity of the Three Divine Persons.

There is then one God and Father, and not two or three; One who is; and there is no other
besides Him, the only true [God]. For "the Lord thy God," saith [the Scripture], "is one
Lord." And again, "Hath not one God created us? Have we not all one Father? And there
is also one Son, God the Word. For "the only-begotten Son," saith [the Scripture], "who
is in the bosom of the Father." And again, "One Lord Jesus Christ." And in another place,
"What is His name, or what His Son's name, that we may know? " And there is also one
Paraclete. For "there is also," saith [the Scripture], "one Spirit," since "we have been
called in one hope of our calling." And again, "We have drunk of one Spirit," with what
follows. And it is manifest that all these gifts [possessed by believers] "worketh one and
the self-same Spirit." There are not then either three Fathers, or three Sons, or three
Paracletes, but one Father, and one Son, and one Paraclete. Wherefore also the Lord,
4
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 5
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
when He sent forth the apostles to make disciples of all nations, commanded them to
"baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost," not unto
one [person] having three names, nor into three [persons] who became incarnate, but into
three possessed of equal honour. (Epistle of Ignatius to the Philippians; source)

Irenaeus (ca. 130-200)

Chapter XVII.-The Apostles Teach that It Was Neither Christ Nor the Saviour, But the
Holy Spirit, Who Did Descend Upon Jesus. The Reason for This Descent.

It certainly was in the power of the apostles to declare that Christ descended upon Jesus,
or that the so-called superior Saviour [came down] upon the dispensational one, or he
who is from the invisible places upon him from the Demiurge; but they neither knew nor
said anything of the kind: for, had they known it, they would have also certainly stated it.
But what really was the case, that did they record, [namely,] that the Spirit of God as a
dove descended upon Him; this Spirit, of whom it was declared by Isaiah, "And the Spirit
of God shall rest upon Him," as I have already said. And again: "The Spirit of the Lord is
upon Me, because He hath anointed Me." That is the Spirit of whom the Lord declares,
"For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you." And
again, giving to the disciples the power of regeneration into God, He said to them, "Go
and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of
the Holy Ghost." For [God] promised, that in the last times He would pour Him [the
Spirit] upon [His] servants and handmaids, that they might prophesy; wherefore He did
also descend upon the Son of God, made the Son of man, becoming accustomed in
fellowship with Him to dwell in the human race, to rest with human beings, and to dwell
in the workmanship of God, working the will of the Father in them, and renewing them
from their old habits into the newness of Christ. (Irenaeus Against Heresies Book III;
source)

Tertullian (ca. 160-220)

Chapter XX.-Christ First Delivered the Faith. The Apostles Spread It; They Founded
Churches as the Depositories Thereof. That Faith, Therefore, is Apostolic, Which
Descended from the Apostles, Through Apostolic Churches.

… Accordingly, after one of these had been struck off, He commanded the eleven others,
on His departure to the Father, to "go and teach all nations, who were to be baptized
into the Father, and into the Son, and into the Holy Ghost." Immediately, therefore, so
did the apostles, whom this designation indicates as "the sent." … (Tertullian The
Prescription Against Heretics; source)

Chapter VI.-The Angel the Forerunner of the Holy Spirit. Meaning Contained in the
Baptismal Formula.

5
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 6
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
Not that in the waters we obtain the Holy Spirit; but in the water, under (the witness of)
the angel, we are cleansed, and prepared for the Holy Spirit. In this case also a type has
preceded; for thus was John beforehand the Lord's forerunner, "preparing His ways."
Thus, too, does the angel, the witness of baptism, "make the paths straight" for the Holy
Spirit, who is about to come upon us, by the washing away of sins, which faith, sealed in
(the name of) the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, obtains. For if "in the
mouth of three witnesses every word shall stand:" -while, through the benediction, we
have the same (three) as witnesses of our faith whom we have as sureties of our salvation
too-how much more does the number of the divine names suffice for the assurance of our
hope likewise! Moreover, after the pledging both of the attestation of faith and the
promise of salvation under "three witnesses," there is added, of necessity, mention of the
Church; inasmuch as, wherever there are three, (that is, the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit,) there is the Church, which is a body of three. (Tertullian On Baptism; source)

Chapter XIII.-Another Objection: Abraham Pleased God Without Being Baptized.

Answer Thereto. Old Things Must Give Place to New, and Baptism is Now a Law.

Here, then, those miscreants provoke questions. And so they say, "Baptism is not
necessary for them to whom faith is sufficient; for withal, Abraham pleased God by a
sacrament of no water, but of faith." But in all cases it is the later things which have a
conclusive force, and the subsequent which prevail over the antecedent. Grant that, in
days gone by, there was salvation by means of bare faith, before the passion and
resurrection of the Lord. But now that faith has been enlarged, and is become a faith
which believes in His nativity, passion, and resurrection, there has been an amplification
added w the sacrament, viz., the sealing act of baptism; the clothing, in some sense, of the
faith which before was bare, and which cannot exist now without its proper law. For the
law of baptizing has been imposed, and the formula prescribed: "Go," He saith, "teach
the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Spirit." The comparison with this law of that definition, "Unless a man have been
reborn of water and Spirit, he shall not enter into the kingdom of the heavens," has tied
faith to the necessity of baptism. Accordingly, all thereafter who became believers used
to be baptized. Then it was, too, that Paul, when he believed, was baptized; and this is the
meaning of the precept which the Lord had given him when smitten with the plague of
loss of sight, saying, "Arise, and enter Damascus; there shall be demonstrated to thee
what thou oughtest to do," to wit-be baptized, which was the only thing lacking to him.
That point excepted, he bad sufficiently learnt and believed "the Nazarene" to be "the
Lord, the Son of God." (Ibid.; source)

Victorinus (ca. 270-303)

15. "And His voice as it were the voice of many waters."] The many waters are
understood to be many peoples, or the gift of baptism that He sent forth by the
apostles, saying: "Go ye, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Victorinus Commentary on the Apocalypse of
the Blessed John; source)
6
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 7
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
For more on the witness of the early Church please consult this source.

Contradictory or Conciliatory Baptismal Formulas?

Another argument used to prove that the Trinitarian formula is a later insertion is to show
from the book of Acts that none of the Apostles ever baptized people into the name of the
Triune God. Instead, they baptized individuals in the name of the Lord Jesus:

"And Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus
Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.’"
Acts 2:38

"But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and
the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women… for it had not yet
fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus."
Acts 8:12, 16

These references are used to somehow prove that Matthew 28:19 could not have been
part of the original text since why would the Apostles not use this Trinitarian formula if
Jesus had indeed given such an instruction?

There are a couple of problems with this assertion. First, the most that the Apostles’
practice of baptizing people in Jesus’ name (as opposed to the Trinity) proves is that Acts
and Matthew are in contradiction. These references do very little to support the argument
that Matthew didn’t originally contain the baptismal formula. Lest the readers
misunderstand the point we are making, we do not believe that these inspired books
contradict each other. We are simply illustrating the fact that to claim that since the
Apostles baptized in Jesus’ name alone this therefore somehow shows that Matthew
28:19 is a later insertion simply does not follow. It may still be the case that both sets of
passages are part of the original documents (which the evidence that we have presented
here shows that 28:19 is definitely part of the original text) and that, at best, this only
shows that we have contradictory accounts.

Now regarding whether these texts are contradictory, a careful analysis of them will show
that this is the furthest thing from the truth. The statements can be easily harmonized with
one another. The citations from the book of Acts are not giving us the formula used by
the Apostles during the actual act of baptism. Rather, they are simply indicating the
authority the Apostles had to perform and proclaim the things they did. In other words,
the Apostles’ reference to "the name of the Lord Jesus" simply meant that the resurrected
Christ had given them the right to proclaim the Gospel, to perform miracles, and to
baptize converts into the Christian community:

"The seventy returned with joy, saying, ‘Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your
name!’ And he said to them, ‘I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have
7
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 8
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
given you authority to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the
enemy; and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are
subject to you; but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.’" Luke 10:17-20

"and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all
nations, beginning from Jerusalem." Luke 24:47

"Now Peter and John were going up to the temple at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour.
And a man lame from birth was being carried, whom they laid daily at that gate of the
temple which is called Beautiful to ask alms of those who entered the temple. Seeing
Peter and John about to go into the temple, he asked for alms. And Peter directed his gaze
at him, with John, and said, ‘Look at us.’ And he fixed his attention upon them, expecting
to receive something from them. But Peter said, ‘I have no silver and gold, but I give you
what I have; in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, walk.’ And he took him by the
right hand and raised him up; and immediately his feet and ankles were made strong. And
leaping up he stood and walked and entered the temple with them, walking and leaping
and praising God. And all the people saw him walking and praising God, and recognized
him as the one who sat for alms at the Beautiful Gate of the temple; and they were filled
with wonder and amazement at what had happened to him. While he clung to Peter and
John, all the people ran together to them in the portico called Solomon’s, astounded. And
when Peter saw it he addressed the people, ‘Men of Israel, why do you wonder at this, or
why do you stare at us, as though by our own power or piety we had made him walk? The
God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant
Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided
to release him. But you denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to
be granted to you, and killed the Author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this
we are witnesses. And his name, by faith in his name, has made this man strong
whom you see and know; and the faith which is through Jesus has given the man
this perfect health in the presence of you all.’" Acts 3:1-16

"To him all the prophets bear witness that every one who believes in him receives
forgiveness of sins through his name." Acts 10:43

The expression was the Apostles’ way of invoking the power and authority of the risen
Lord to do and say the things they did. It had nothing to do with the words spoken or the
formula being used during the actual immersion of the believers into the waters of
baptism.

More importantly, even if we were to somehow assume that Acts is referring to the
formula used in the act of baptizing converts, this still wouldn’t be a contradiction. Note
once again what the texts actually say:

"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them IN THE NAME OF the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit," Matthew 28:19

8
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 9
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
"And he commanded them to be baptized IN THE NAME OF Jesus Christ. Then they
asked him to remain for some days." Acts 10:48

According to the Holy Bible the name of God is Yahweh, which the Greek version of the
inspired Hebrew Scriptures rendered as Kyrios or Lord:

"God also said to Moses, ‘Say this to the people of Israel, "The LORD, the God of your
fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to
you": this is my name for ever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all
generations.’" Exodus 3:15

"And God said to Moses, ‘I am the LORD. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to
Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to
them.’" Exodus 6:2-3

And according to the New Testament Jesus’ name is Yahweh or Lord:

"yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist,
and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist." 1
Corinthians 8:6

"Therefore I want you to understand that no one speaking by the Spirit of God ever says
‘Jesus be cursed!’ and no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit." 1
Corinthians 12:3

"Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above
every name, that at THE NAME OF Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on
earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the
glory of God the Father." Philippians 2:9-11

What this basically means is that the name of Jesus that the believers were to be baptized
into is the Divine name of God, i.e. Yahweh or Lord, which is the very same name of
both the Father and the Holy Spirit:

"Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. And
we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being changed into his
likeness from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord who is the
Spirit." 2 Corinthians 3:17-18

Thus, baptizing persons into the name of Jesus or into the name of the three Persons
essentially comes out to mean the same thing, since the name of all three is Yahweh.

This would also imply that it is Christ’s authority as the sovereign Lord or Yahweh that
enables believers to do the things that they do for his immortal glory.

9
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 10
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org

Theological Implications

It is obvious why some would want to cast doubt upon the veracity of Matthew 28:19
since this passage is an explicit testimony to the full Deity and coequality of the three
Persons of the Godhead. An examination of the text within its immediate context shows
that the Lord Jesus clearly believed and taught that God existed as three distinct and
coequal Divine Persons:

"Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed
them. And when they saw him they worshiped him; but some doubted. And Jesus came
and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go
therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the NAME of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (onoma tou patros kai tou huiou kai tou hagiou
pneumatos), teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with
you always, to the close of the age.’" Matthew 28:16-20

Here, the resurrected Christ is worshiped by his followers, claims to have received
universal sovereignty, points to his sharing the one Divine name of the Father and of the
Holy Spirit, and states that he is omnipresent since he promises to be with all believers to
the very end of the age!

Another interesting point about this text is that it repeats the definite article (Greek tou)
before all three of the Divine Persons and applies the conjunction "and" (Greek kai)
before the Son and Holy Spirit, which is significant in showing that they are truly distinct
from one another. According to a monograph published by Granville Sharp in 1798
regarding the use of the article in the New Testament, one of his rules (specifically the
sixth rule) shows that since Matthew 28:19 uses the kai-article construction before the
words Father, Son, Holy Spirit, this therefore demonstrates a distinction in their Persons.
This fact refutes the claims of Modalists that the three are different manifestations of a
singular Person.

Moreover, seeing that the first two nouns (i.e., "the Father," "the Son") definitely refer to
Persons, we can safely assume that the third noun (i.e., "the Holy Spirit") also has a
Person in view, a fact confirmed elsewhere by Matthew:

"When they deliver you up, do not be anxious how you are to speak or what you are to
say; for what you are to say will be given to you in that hour; for it is not you who speak,
but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you." Matthew 10:19-20

The Holy Spirit speaks through the Apostles, a clear indication of his Personhood and
omnipresence. After all, the only way that the Spirit could be with all of the disciples
simultaneously so as to assist them during their trials and tribulations is he if were able to
be at more than one place at the same time!

10
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr
 11
Muslims Asking Christians: Questions & Answer
http://answering-islam.org
Hence, since Matthew 28:19 groups three distinct Persons together under the same
Divine name we therefore have very good and strong grounds for thinking that these
Persons all exist as the one God.

Noted Bible expositor, the late John Gill, commented on the implications and
significance the Trinitarian formula has on the doctrine of the blessed Trinity:

in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;
by the authority of these three divine persons, who all appeared, and testified their
approbation of the administration of this ordinance, at the baptism of Christ: and as they
are to be invocated in it, so the persons baptized not only profess faith in each divine
person, but are devoted to their service, and worship, and are laid under obligation to
obedience to them, Hence a confirmation of the doctrine of the Trinity, there are three
persons, but one name, but one God, into which believers are baptized; and a proof of the
true deity both of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost; and that Christ, as the Son of God, is
God; since baptism is administered equally in the name of all three, as a religious
ordinance, a part of divine instituted worship, which would never be in the name of a
creature. This is the first, and indeed the only, place in which the Trinity of persons is
expressed in this order, and in the selfsame words… (Source)

In light of the foregoing, it is not hard to see why anti-Trinitarians would want to simply
do away with this text and why this happens to be one of the favorite passages used by
Trinitarians in support of their position.

All scriptural quotations taken from the Revised Standard Version (RSV) of the Holy
Bible.

Related Articles

http://irr.org/wit/pdfs/Matthew-28-and-the-Trinity.pdf

11
www.Nurul-Haque.Co.Nr