0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
32 Ansichten78 Seiten
1. Under the 1987 Constitution, local governments or local government units (LGUs) are referred to as "political and territorial subdivisions". LGUs are classified as public corporations and municipal corporations proper. They are established for the government of a portion of the State and can only exercise powers within their territorial boundary or jurisdiction, with few exceptions.
2. Local governments are distinguished from national government and quasi-corporations created by LGUs. LGUs have a two-fold character - governmental/public and proprietary/private. They act as agents of the State in exercising governmental powers and as agents of the community in exercising proprietary powers.
3. The rule on corporate succession applies to LGU
1. Under the 1987 Constitution, local governments or local government units (LGUs) are referred to as "political and territorial subdivisions". LGUs are classified as public corporations and municipal corporations proper. They are established for the government of a portion of the State and can only exercise powers within their territorial boundary or jurisdiction, with few exceptions.
2. Local governments are distinguished from national government and quasi-corporations created by LGUs. LGUs have a two-fold character - governmental/public and proprietary/private. They act as agents of the State in exercising governmental powers and as agents of the community in exercising proprietary powers.
3. The rule on corporate succession applies to LGU
1. Under the 1987 Constitution, local governments or local government units (LGUs) are referred to as "political and territorial subdivisions". LGUs are classified as public corporations and municipal corporations proper. They are established for the government of a portion of the State and can only exercise powers within their territorial boundary or jurisdiction, with few exceptions.
2. Local governments are distinguished from national government and quasi-corporations created by LGUs. LGUs have a two-fold character - governmental/public and proprietary/private. They act as agents of the State in exercising governmental powers and as agents of the community in exercising proprietary powers.
3. The rule on corporate succession applies to LGU
AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 1 !"#$"%"! '( )'*+) ,'#"!(-"(. )+%
+/01234 *5 +627 rofessor of Laws, ollLlcal Law 8ar 8evlewer ALeneo Law School (drafL as of 10 november 2012)
arL 1 )487/ ,4912:;1:3< 3
naLure of Local CovernmenL unlLs 3 1ypes of Local CovernmenL unlLs 6 CreaLlon of Local CovernmenL unlLs 9
arL 2 )487/ +=34:4;> 13
unlLary, noL lederal, lorm 13 Local AuLonomy 14 uevoluLlon and ueconcenLraLlon 16 LxecuLlve Supervlslon 19 LeglslaLlve ConLrol 23
arL 3 ?4@12< 4A )487/ ,4912:;1:3< 23
uelegaLlon and lnLerpreLaLlon of owers 23 ollce ower 28 LmlnenL uomaln 33 8eclasslflcaLlon of Land 38 Local LeglslaLlon 39 CLher CovernmenLal and CorporaLe owers 48
SuablllLy and LlablllLy 63 LlablllLy of Local CovernmenL unlLs 63 LlablllLy of Local Cfflclals 64 AdmlnlsLraLlve roceedlngs 68 enalLles 70 revenLlve Suspenslon 70 LffecL of 8e-LlecLlon 72
arL 7 ?14G/1H< ?723E8EG73E4: 73
venues for opular arLlclpaLlon 73 rlor MandaLory ConsulLaLlon 73 lnlLlaLlve and 8eferendum 73 Local Speclal 8odles 73 arLnershlps and AsslsLance 76 8ecall 76 SecLoral 8epresenLaLlves 77
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 3
?723 I5 )'*+) ,'#"!(-"(.C
!"#$%& () *(+", -(.&%/0&/# 1/2#3
1. under Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon, local governmenLs or local governmenL unlLs (LCus) are referred Lo as pollLlcal and LerrlLorlal subdlvlslons" (5ectloo 1, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
1.1 An LCu ls a publlc corporaLlon and ls classlfled as a munlclpal corporaLlon proper.
a. 1he four elemenLs of an LCu are: (1) legal creaLlon, (2) corporaLe name, (3) lnhablLanLs, and (4) place or LerrlLory (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985).
b. 1hey are esLabllshed for Lhe governmenL of a porLlon of Lhe SLaLe (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985).
c. An LCu can only exerclse lLs powers wlLhln lLs LerrlLorlal boundary or [urlsdlcLlon. lLs powers are lnLramural. As an excepLlon, an LCu can exerclse lLs powers ouLslde Lhe subdlvlslon (exLramural) ln Lhree occaslons, namely, (1) proLecLlon of waLer supply, (2) prevenLlon of nulsance, and (3) pollce purposes. (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985).
1.2 Local governmenLs are admlnlsLraLlve agencles and agencles of CovernmenL dlsLlngulshed from Lhe naLlonal CovernmenL whlch refers Lo Lhe enLlre machlnery of Lhe cenLral governmenL (5ectloos 2 j4] ooJ j2], 1987 AJmlolsttotlve coJe).
1.3 ubllc corporaLlons creaLed by local governmenLs are referred Lo as quasl-munlclpal corporaLlons (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985).
1.4 Local governmenLs are dlsLlngulshed from quasl-corporaLlons. Cuasl- corporaLlons are creaLed by Lhe SLaLe, elLher by law or by auLhorlLy of law, for a speclflc governmenLal purpose (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 4
a. A governmenL-owned and -conLrolled corporaLlon (CCCC) musL be organlzed elLher as a sLock or non-sLock corporaLlon. (MlAA vs. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
l. A CCCC ls vesLed by law wlLh a legal personallLy separaLe and dlsLlncL from Lhose acLlng for and ln lLs behalf and, ln general, from Lhe people comprlslng lL (MlAA vs. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
ll. A CCCC creaLed Lhrough speclal charLer musL meeL Lhe Lwo condlLlons, namely: (a) lL musL be esLabllshed for Lhe common good, and (b) lL musL meeL Lhe LesL of economlc vlablllLy (5ectloo 16, Attlcle \ll, 1987 coostltotloo).
lll. Lxamples of CCCCs are: CCCCs lncorporaLed under Lhe CorporaLlon Code, subsldlarles of CCCCs, CovernmenL llnanclal lnsLlLuLlons (Clls), WaLer ulsLrlcLs, governmenL-acqulred asseL corporaLlon (MlAA vs. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
b. A governmenL lnsLrumenLallLy (Cl) ls nelLher a sLock nor a non-sLock corporaLlon (MlAA vs. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
l. A Cl, whlch ls operaLlonally auLonomous, remalns parL of Lhe naLlonal CovernmenL machlnery alLhough noL lnLegraLed wlLh Lhe deparLmenL framework (MlAA vs. v. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
ll. Lxamples of Cls are: 8angko SenLral ng lllplnas, hlllpplne 8lce 8esearch lnsLlLuLe, Laguna Lake uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy, llsherles uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy, 8ases Converslon uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy, hlllpplne orLs AuLhorlLy, Cagayan de Cro orL AuLhorlLy, San lernando orL AuLhorlLy, Cebu orL AuLhorlLy, and hlllpplne naLlonal 8allways (MlAA vs. v. cA, C.k. No. 155650, Ioly 20, 2006).
2. 1he characLer of LCs ls Lwo-fold, l.e., governmenLal or publlc, and proprleLary or prlvaLe (clty of Moollo vs. lotetmeJlote Appellote coott, C.k. No. 71159, Novembet 15, 1989).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 3 2.1 CovernmenLal powers are Lhose exerclsed ln admlnlsLerlng Lhe powers of Lhe sLaLe and promoLlng Lhe publlc welfare and Lhey lnclude Lhe leglslaLlve, [udlclal, publlc and pollLlcal. Lxamples are: dellvery of sand for a munlclpal road (Moolclpollty of 5oo letoooJo, lo uoloo vs. lltme, C.k. No. l-52179, Aptll 8, 1991), local leglslaLlon, conLrol over pollce and abaLemenL of nulsance.
2.2 roprleLary powers, on Lhe oLher hand, are exerclsed for Lhe speclal beneflL and advanLage of Lhe communlLy and lnclude Lhose whlch are mlnlsLerlal, prlvaLe and corporaLe (Moolclpollty of 5oo letoooJo, lo uoloo vs. lltme, C.k. No. l-52179, Aptll 8, 1991). Lxamples are: publlc cemeLerles, markeLs, ferrles and waLerworks.
2.3 1herefore, Lhe purpose of LCs ls also Lwo-fold, l.e., LCs are agenLs of Lhe SLaLe ln Lhe exerclse of governmenL or publlc powers, and are agenLs of Lhe communlLy and people ln Lhe exerclse of proprleLary or prlvaLe powers (lloo, It. vs. loo, C.k. No. 12909J, Aoqost J0, 2001, Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994, 8osco vs. lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 91649, Moy 14, 1991).
3. 1he rule on corporaLe successlon applles Lo local governmenLs.
3.1 1hey have Lhe power of conLlnuous successlon under lLs corporaLe name. (5ectloo 22, locol Covetomeot coJe of 1991 ot 1991 lCc).
3.2 When Lhere ls a perfecLed conLracL execuLed by Lhe former Covernor, Lhe succeedlng Covernor cannoL revoke or renounce Lhe same wlLhouL Lhe consenL of Lhe oLher parLy (Covetomeot 5etvlce losotooce 5ystem vs. ltovloce of 1otloc, C.k. No. 157860, uecembet 1, 200J).
4. Congress ln enacLlng Lhe 1991 LCC and charLers of parLlcular LCs allocaLes among Lhe dlfferenL LCs Lhelr powers, responslblllLles, and resources and provlde for Lhe quallflcaLlons, elecLlon, appolnLmenL and removal, Lerm, salarles, powers and funcLlons and duLles of local offlclals, and all oLher maLLers relaLlng Lo Lhe organlzaLlon and operaLlon of Lhe local unlLs (5ectloo J, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
4.1 Cne such power ls Lhe power Lo appolnL offlclals. Whlle Lhe Covernor has Lhe auLhorlLy Lo appolnL offlclals and employees whose salarles are pald drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 6 ouL of Lhe provlnclal funds, Lhls does noL exLend Lo Lhe offlclals and employees of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo because such auLhorlLy ls lodged wlLh Lhe vlce-Covernor (Atleozo vs. vlllotoso, C.k. No. 161081, Moy 10, 2005).
4.2 1he auLhorlLy Lo appolnL casual and [ob order employees of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo belongs Lo Lhe vlce-Covernor. 1he auLhorlLy of Lhe vlce-Covernor Lo appolnL Lhe offlclals and employees of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo ls anchored on Lhe facL LhaL Lhe salarles of Lhese employees are derlved from Lhe approprlaLlon speclflcally for sald local leglslaLlve body. Accordlngly, Lhe appolnLlng power of Lhe vlce- Covernor ls llmlLed Lo Lhose employees of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo, as well as Lhose of Lhe Cfflce of Lhe vlce-Covernor, whose salarles are pald ouL of Lhe funds approprlaLed for Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo (Atleozo vs. vlllotoso, C.k. No. 161081, Moy 10, 2005).
4.3 ln allocaLlng local powers, Congress may provlde for a sysLem of checks and balances.
a. 1he sysLem of checks and balances under Lhe currenL sysLem ls sLaLuLorlly, noL consLlLuLlonally (unllke Lhe Lhree branches of CovernmenL), prescrlbed.
b. under Lhe 1983 Local CovernmenL Code, Lhe local chlef execuLlve performed dual funcLlons - execuLlve and leglslaLlve, he/she belng Lhe presldlng offlcer of Lhe sooqqooloo. under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lhe unlon of leglslaLlve and execuLlve powers ln Lhe offlce of Lhe local chlef execuLlve has been dlsbanded, so LhaL elLher deparLmenL now comprlses dlfferenL and non-lnLermlngllng offlclal personallLles wlLh Lhe end ln vlew of ensurlng a beLLer dellvery of publlc servlce and provlde a sysLem of check and balance beLween Lhe Lwo (Atleozo vs. vlllotoso, C.k. No. 161081, Moy 10, 2005).
456&3 () *(+", -(.&%/0&/# 1/2#3
1. 1here are flve levels/ klnds of pollLlcal and LerrlLorlal subdlvlslons, namely: (1) AuLonomous 8eglons, (2) rovlnces, (3) ClLles, (4) MunlclpallLles, and (3) 8arangays (5ectloo 1, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 7
a. AuLonomous 8eglons conslsL of provlnces, clLles, munlclpallLles, and geographlcal areas whlch share common and dlsLlncLlve hlsLorlcal and culLural herlLage, economlc and soclal sLrucLures, and oLher relevanL characLerlsLlcs (5ectloo 15, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
b. AuLonomous 8eglons are under Lhe general supervlslon of Lhe resldenL (5ectloo 16, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
c. SecLlon 20, ArLlcle x of Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon enumeraLes Lhe lrreduclble leglslaLlve powers of auLonomous reglons: WlLhln lLs LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlon and sub[ecL Lo Lhe provlslons of Lhls ConsLlLuLlon and naLlonal laws, Lhe organlc acL of auLonomous reglons shall provlde for leglslaLlve powers over: (1) AdmlnlsLraLlve organlzaLlon, (2) CreaLlon of sources of revenues, (3) AncesLral domaln and naLural resources, (4) ersonal, famlly, and properLy relaLlons, (3) 8eglonal urban and rural plannlng developmenL, (6) Lconomlc, soclal, and Lourlsm developmenL, (7) LducaLlonal pollcles, (8) reservaLlon and developmenL of Lhe culLural herlLage, and (9) Such oLher maLLers as may be auLhorlzed by law for Lhe promoLlon of Lhe general welfare of Lhe people of Lhe reglon.
d. 8epubllc AcL no. 6734 or Lhe Crganlc AcL of Lhe AuLonomous 8eglon of Musllm Mlndanao (A8MM) ls consLlLuLlonal and ls noL vlolaLlve of Lhe 1rlpoll AgreemenL slnce Lhe former ls a laLer enacLmenL. lurLher, Lhe 1rlpoll AgreemenL musL conform wlLh naLlonal laws such as Lhe Crganlc AcL. (Abbos vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 89651, Novembet 10, 1989).
e. 1he slngle pleblsclLe conLemplaLed by Lhe ConsLlLuLlon and 8.A. no. 6734 wlll be deLermlnaLlve of: (1) wheLher Lhere shall be an auLonomous reglon ln Musllm Mlndanao, and (2) whlch provlnces and clLles, among Lhose enumeraLed ln 8.A. no. 6734, shall comprlse lL (Abbos vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 89651, Novembet 10, 1989).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 8 f. Whlle Lhey are classlfled as sLaLuLes, Lhe Crganlc AcLs are more Lhan ordlnary sLaLuLes because Lhey en[oy afflrmaLlon by a pleblsclLe. Pence, Lhe provlslons Lhereof cannoL be amended by an ordlnary sLaLuLe wlLhouL belng approved ln a pleblsclLe (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004).
g. An acL of Lhe 8eglonal Assembly of A8MM cannoL amend Lhe Crganlc AcL nor can lL amend Lhe 1991 LCC. 1he 1991 LCC and Lhe 1987 AdmlnlsLraLlve Code cannoL amend Lhe Crganlc AcL (looJl vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 116850, Aptll 11, 2002).
h. 1he AuLonomous 8eglon of Lhe Cordllleras has noL been lncorporaLed slnce ln Lhe pleblsclLe held, Lhe creaLlon has been re[ecLed by all Lhe covered provlnces and clLy, save one provlnce. 1here can be no auLonomous reglon conslsLlng of only one provlnce (8oJoo vs. cotJllleto 8oJooq AJmlolsttotloo, C.k. No. 92649, lebtooty 14, 1991, OtJlllos vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 9J054, uecembet 4, 1990).
l. Powever, Lhe resldenL can creaLe Lhe Cordlllera AdmlnlsLraLlve 8eglon (CA8). 1he LxecuLlve Crder does noL creaLe Lhe auLonomous reglon for Lhe Cordllleras. 1he CA8: (1) ls noL a LerrlLorlal and pollLlcal subdlvlslon, (2) ls noL a publlc corporaLlon, (3) does noL have a separaLe [urldlcal personallLy, (4) ls sub[ecL Lo conLrol and supervlslon of Lhe resldenL, and (3) ls merely a reglonal consulLaLlve and coordlnaLlve councll (cotJllleto 8tooJ coolltloo vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 79956, Iooooty 29, 1990).
1.2 1here are Lhree sub-Lypes of clLles, namely: (1) hlghly-urbanlzed, (2) lndependenL clLles, and (3) componenL clLles.
a. 1he hlghly-urbanlzed clLles and lndependenL componenL clLles are noL under Lhe supervlslon of provlnces and Lhelr voLers are noL quallfled Lo voLe for provlnclal offlclals (5ectloo 12, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo, 5ectloo 29, 1991 lCc). 1hese clLles are under Lhe dlrecL supervlslon of Lhe resldenL (5ectloo 25, 1991 lCc).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 9 b. ComponenL clLles are under Lhe supervlslon of provlnces and Lhelr voLers elecL provlnclal offlclals (5ectloo 12, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
7%&"#2(/ () *(+", -(.&%/0&/# 1/2#3
1. Cnly Congress and, by auLhorlLy of law, local leglslaLlve counclls, can creaLe speclflc LCs. CreaLlon ls a leglslaLlve acL. 1he enabllng law ls referred Lo as Lhe charLer of Lhe LCu.
1.1 1he resldenL or Lhe LxecuLlve 8ranch of CovernmenL has no power Lo creaLe local governmenLs (comlJ vs. Offlce of tbe lteslJeot, C.k. No. 161414, Iooooty 17, 2005).
a. MunlclpallLles creaLed by execuLlve flaL buL whose exlsLence were noL [udlclally nulllfled and whlch conLlnue Lo operaLe and exlsL afLer 1992 are consldered regular munlclpallLles. 1he 1991 LCC ls Lhus a curaLlve leglslaLlon. lf [udlclally annulled ln a quo warranLo case, Lhe 1991 LCC wlll have no curaLlve effecL (5ectloo 442jJ], 1991 lCc).
b. An LCu creaLed by execuLlve flaL whlch operaLed or funcLloned wlLhouL lnLerrupLlon ls consldered a munlclpallLy by prescrlpLlon (Moolclpollty of Ilmeoez vs. 8oz, C.k. No. 105746, uecembet 2, 1996).
1.2 Congress can provlde for Lhe lncorporaLlon of AuLonomous 8eglons ldenLlfled under Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon. lL has noL power Lo creaLe oLher AuLonomous 8eglons oLher Lhan ln Musllm Mlndanao and Cordllleras.
a. 1he Crganlc AcL shall deflne Lhe baslc sLrucLure of governmenL for Lhe reglon conslsLlng of Lhe execuLlve deparLmenL and leglslaLlve assembly, boLh of whlch shall be elecLlve and represenLaLlve of Lhe consLlLuenL pollLlcal unlLs. 1he organlc acLs shall llkewlse provlde for speclal courLs wlLh personal, famlly, and properLy law [urlsdlcLlon conslsLenL wlLh Lhe provlslons of Lhls ConsLlLuLlon and naLlonal laws (5ectloo 18, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
b. 1he creaLlon of Lhe auLonomous reglon shall be effecLlve when approved by ma[orlLy of Lhe voLes casL by Lhe consLlLuenL unlLs ln a drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 10 pleblsclLe called for Lhe purpose, provlded LhaL only provlnces, clLles, and geographlc areas voLlng favorably ln such pleblsclLe shall be lncluded ln Lhe auLonomous reglon (5ectloo 18, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
c. 1he resldenL cannoL creaLe a sLaLe", l.e., 8angsamoro !urldlcal LnLlLy esLabllshed under a Memorandum of AgreemenL, whose relaLlonshlp wlLh Lhe governmenL ls characLerlzed by shared auLhorlLy and responslblllLy. lL ls a sLaLe ln all buL name as lL meeLs Lhe crlLerla of sLaLehood: (1) a permanenL populaLlon, (2) a deflned LerrlLory, (3) a governmenL, and (4) a capaclLy Lo enLer lnLo relaLlons wlLh oLher sLaLes (ltovloce of Nottb cotoboto vs. Covetomeot of tbe kepobllc of tbe lblllpploes leoce looel oo Aocesttol uomolo, C.k. No. 18J591, Octobet 14, 2008).
1.3 Congress can creaLe provlnces, clLles, munlclpallLles and barangays sub[ecL Lo Lhe crlLerla speclfled under Lhe 1991 LCC (5ectloo 10, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo) and speclal laws such as 8epubllc AcL no. 9009 (converslon of munlclpallLles Lo componenL clLles).
a. Congress, by speclal law, can provlde for dlfferenL requlremenLs oLher Lhan Lhose speclfled ln Lhe 1991 LCC (leoqoe of cltles of tbe lblllpploes v. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. Nos. 176951, 177499 ooJ 178056, Aptll 12, 2011).
b. 1he lmplemenLlng rules and regulaLlons cannoL provlde dlfferenL requlremenLs oLher Lhan whaL ls provlded by law. LxempLlon by admlnlsLraLlve regulaLlon from land requlremenL when Lhe provlnce Lo be creaLed ls composed of one or more lslands ls lnvalld (Novotto vs. tmlto, C.k. No. 180050, Aptll 12, 2011).
c. 1he sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo and sooqqoolooq poolooqsoJ can creaLe barangays (5ectloo 6, 1991 lCc). 1he sooqqoolooq boyoo has no such auLhorlLy under Lhe 1991 LCC.
1.4 An LCu ls deemed creaLed on Lhe day lLs charLer Lakes effecL.
a. lL ls deemed lncorporaLed on Lhe day Lhe charLer ls approved by a ma[orlLy of Lhe voLes casL ln a pleblsclLe ln Lhe pollLlcal unlLs dlrecLly drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 11 affecLed (5ectloo 10, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo, 5ectloo 10, 1991 lCc).
l. When a munlclpallLy ls spllL lnLo Lwo, all Lhe barangays of Lhe orlglnal munlclpallLy musL voLe. 1he pleblsclLe elecLoraLe lncludes Lhose who wlll be economlcally dlslocaLed and based on plurallLy of unlLs (loJlllo vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 10JJ28, Octobet 19, 1992).
ll. A pleblsclLe ls requlred when a munlclpallLy ls converLed lnLo an lndependenL componenL clLy and when Lhe laLLer ls laLer converLed Lo a componenL clLy as Lhere was an upgrade" and downgrade" parLlcularly lnsofar as Laxes and supervlslon are concerned (MltooJo vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1JJ064, 5eptembet 16, 1999).
lll. A boundary dlspuLe presenLs a pre[udlclal quesLlon Lo a pleblsclLe and Lhus musL be resolved prlor Lo Lhe conducL of any pleblsclLe (clty of loslq vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 125646, 5eptembet 10, 1999).
lv. 1he Commlsslon on LlecLlons, noL Lhe regular courLs, has [urlsdlcLlon over pleblsclLe proLesL cases (8ooc vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 155855, Iooooty 26, 2004).
b. 1he corporaLe exlsLence of an LCu shall commence upon Lhe elecLlon and quallflcaLlon of lLs chlef execuLlve and a ma[orlLy of Lhe members of lLs sooqqooloo, unless some oLher Llme ls flxed Lherefor by Lhe law or ordlnance creaLlng lL (5ectloo 14, 1991 lCc).
2. 1he requlremenLs for creaLlon of local governmenLs are: (1) populaLlon, (2) lncome, and (3) land area.
2.1 under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lhese are speclflc requlremenLs for every Lype or sub-Lype of LCu (5ectloos 461, 450, 442, J86, 1991 lCc):
kepoltemeot ltovloce clty Moolclpollty 8otooqoy lncome 20 mllllon 20 mllllon CC 30 mllllon 2.3 mllllon --- Economic dislocation plurality of units PIL drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 12 PuC 100 mllllon M Lo CC opulaLlon 230,000 130,000 CC 200,000 PuC 23,000 2,000 3,000 MeLro Land Area 2,000 km 2 100 km 2 30 km 2 ConLlguous
2.2 lor purposes of creaLlon, only Lhe land area ls maLerlal. 1he law ls clear.
a. 1he aggregaLe LerrlLory whlch lncludes waLers ls noL Lhe crlLerla for creaLlon under Lhe 1991 LCC (5ectloo 1J1 jt]).
b. A charLer sLaLes Lhe boundarles of Lhe local governmenL. Areas or barangays noL menLloned are excluded (Moolclpollty of Noevo to vs. Moolclpollty of Motcos, C.k. No. 1694J5, lebtooty 27, 2008).
2.3 A charLer need noL menLlon Lhe populaLlon census (1oblos vs. Abolos, C.k. No. 11478J, uecembet 8, 1994).
2.4 lallure Lo sLaLe Lhe seaL of governmenL ln Lhe charLer ls noL faLal (5omsoo vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1JJ076, 5eptembet 22, 1999).
2.3 lncome under Lhe 1991 LCC perLalns Lo all funds of Lhe LCu lncludlng Lhe lnLernal 8evenue AlloLmenL (Alvotez vs. Coloqooo, C.k. No. 118J0J, Iooooty J1, 1996). Powever, under 8.A. 9009 whlch deals wlLh Lhe converslon of a munlclpallLy Lo a componenL clLy, Lhe funds musL be lnLernally-generaLed.
2.6 1he requlremenLs for Lhe creaLlon of a componenL clLy and an lndependenL componenL clLy are Lhe same.
2.7 uependlng on Lhe Lype of LCu creaLed, Lhe presence of all Lhe requlremenLs of opulaLlon (), Land Area (LA) and lncome (?) may vary (5ectloos 461, 450, 442, J86, 1991 lCc):
8arangay and LA MunlclpallLy and LA and ? ClLy and ?, or ? and LA PuC and ? rovlnce and ?, or ? and LA However, geographic districts and zones are not political units; there are no elected city government ofcials in these city-specic administrative levels. Rather they only serve to make city planning and other administrative tasks easier and more convenient. drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 13
3. When a munlclpallLy ls converLed Lo a clLy, Lhe laLLer acqulres a dlsLlncL legal personallLy from Lhe former. 1here ls maLerlal change ln Lhe pollLlcal and economlc rlghLs of Lhe Lwo LCs (lotoso vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 154829, uecembet 10, 200J).
?723 J5 )'*+) +F.'('-K
1/2#"%58 /(# 9&:&%",8 9(%0
1. 1he form of LCu bureaucracy ls unlLary, noL federal (Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994).
1.1 LCs as pollLlcal and LerrlLorlal subdlvlslons are unlLs of Lhe SLaLe. 8elng so, any form of auLonomy granLed Lo LCs wlll necessarlly be llmlLed and conflned wlLhln Lhe exLenL allowed by Lhe cenLral auLhorlLy (Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994).
1.2 LCs are noL soverelgn unlLs wlLhln Lhe SLaLe. 1hey are noL emplres wlLhln an emplre (lloo, It. vs. loo, C.k. No. 12909J, Aoqost J0, 2001, Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994).
1.3 AuLonomy does noL conLemplaLe maklng mlnl-sLaLes ouL of LCs (Coozoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 9J252, Aoqost 5, 1991).
1.4 1he 1987 ConsLlLuLlon does noL conLemplaLe any sLaLe ln Lhls [urlsdlcLlon oLher Lhan Lhe hlllpplne SLaLe, much less does lL provlde for a LranslLory sLaLus LhaL alms Lo prepare any parL of hlllpplne LerrlLory for lndependence (ltovloce of Nottb cotoboto vs. Covetomeot of tbe kepobllc of tbe lblllpploes leoce looel oo Aocesttol uomolo, C.k. No. 18J591, Octobet 14, 2008).
1.3 lederallsm lmplles some measure of decenLrallzaLlon, buL unlLary sysLems may also decenLrallze. uecenLrallzaLlon dlffers lnLrlnslcally from federallsm ln LhaL Lhe sub-unlLs LhaL have been auLhorlzed Lo acL (by Limited autonomy to the extent allowed by the central authority drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 14 delegaLlon) do noL possess any clalm of rlghL agalnsL Lhe cenLral governmenL (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004).
*(+", ;$#(/(05
1. Local auLonomy means a more responslve and accounLable local governmenL sLrucLure lnsLlLuLed Lhrough a sysLem of decenLrallzaLlon (5ectloo J, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo, 5ectloo 2jo], 1991 lCc, Coozoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 9J252, Aoqost 5, 1991).
1.1 under a unlLary seL-up, local auLonomy does noL mean absoluLe self- governance, self-rule or self-deLermlnaLlon (lobllc cotpototloos, kopetto C. Mottlo, 1985). LCs cannoL exerclse a power conLrary Lo Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon, Lhe 1991 LCC, sLaLuLes and Lhelr respecLlve charLers.
1.2 AuLonomy ls noL meanL Lo end Lhe relaLlon of parLnershlp and lnLerdependence beLween Lhe cenLral admlnlsLraLlon and LCs, or oLherwlse, Lo usher ln a reglme of federallsm (Coozoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 9J252, Aoqost 5, 1991).
2. 1here are Lwo levels of decenLrallzaLlon. Local auLonomy ls elLher decenLrallzaLlon of admlnlsLraLlon or decenLrallzaLlon of power (llmbooo vs. Mooqello, C.k. No. 80J91, lebtooty 28, 1989).
2.1 1here ls decenLrallzaLlon of admlnlsLraLlon when Lhe cenLral governmenL delegaLes admlnlsLraLlve powers Lo pollLlcal subdlvlslons ln order Lo broaden Lhe base of governmenL power and ln Lhe process Lo make local governmenLs more responslve and accounLable, and ensure Lhelr fullesL developmenL as self-rellanL communlLles and make Lhem more effecLlve parLners ln Lhe pursulL of naLlonal developmenL and soclal progress. (llmbooo vs. Mooqello, C.k. No. 80J91, lebtooty 28, 1989).
2.2 uecenLrallzaLlon of power, on Lhe oLher hand, lnvolves an abdlcaLlon of pollLlcal power ln favor of local governmenL unlLs declared Lo be auLonomous. 1he auLonomous governmenL ls free Lo charL lLs own desLlny and shape lLs fuLure wlLh mlnlmum lnLervenLlon from cenLral auLhorlLles (llmbooo vs. Mooqello, C.k. No. 80J91, lebtooty 28, 1989). - responsive and accountable structure through decentralization drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 13
ueceottollzotloo of AJmlolsttotloo ueceottollzotloo of lowet uelegaLlon of admlnlsLraLlve and regulaLory powers AbdlcaLlon of pollLlcal power 8elleves sLaLe from burden of managlng local affalrs CharL own desLlny LxecuLlve supervlslon LxecuLlve supervlslon, mlnlmal lnLervenLlon AccounLablllLy Lo cenLral governmenL AccounLablllLy Lo people, self- lmmolaLlon Applles Lo provlnces, clLles, munlclpallLles and barangays Applles Lo auLonomous reglons
3. 1he A8MM en[oys pollLlcal auLonomy (llmbooo vs. Mooqello, C.k. No. 80J91, lebtooty 28, 1989, cotJllleto 8tooJ coolltloo vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 79956, Iooooty 29, 1990). 1he creaLlon of auLonomous reglons conLemplaLes Lhe granL of pollLlcal auLonomy l.e., an auLonomy whlch ls greaLer Lhan Lhe admlnlsLraLlve auLonomy granLed Lo (oLher) LCs (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004).
3.1 8eglonal auLonomy ls Lhe degree of self-deLermlnaLlon exerclsed by Lhe LCu vls-a-vls Lhe cenLral governmenL. 8eglonal auLonomy refers Lo Lhe granLlng of baslc lnLernal governmenL powers Lo Lhe people of a parLlcular area or reglon wlLh leasL conLrol and supervlslon from Lhe cenLral governmenL (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004).
3.2 1he alm of Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon ls Lo exLend Lo Lhe auLonomous peoples, Lhe people of Musllm Mlndanao ln Lhls case, Lhe rlghL Lo self- deLermlnaLlon, l.e., a rlghL Lo choose Lhelr own paLh of developmenL, Lhe rlghL Lo deLermlne Lhe pollLlcal, culLural and economlc conLenL of Lhelr developmenL paLh wlLhln Lhe framework of Lhe soverelgnLy and LerrlLorlal lnLegrlLy of Lhe hlllpplne 8epubllc (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 16 4. 1he LxecuLlve ueparLmenL vlolaLes local auLonomy when lL lgnores Lhe sLaLuLory auLhorlLy of provlnce Lo nomlnaLe budgeL offlclals (5oo Iooo vs. clvll 5etvlce commlssloo, C.k. No. 92299, Aptll 19, 1991).
3. Where a law ls capable of Lwo lnLerpreLaLlons, one ln favor of cenLrallzed power and Lhe oLher beneflclal Lo local auLonomy, Lhe scales musL be welghed ln favor of auLonomy (5oo Iooo vs. clvll 5etvlce commlssloo, C.k. No. 92299, Aptll 19, 1991).
6. LCus have broad powers ln Lhe followlng areas: (1) ollce ower, (2) ower of 1axaLlon, (3) ower Lo lmpose lees and Charges, (4) Sources of Local 8evenues, (3) CorporaLe owers, and (6) Local LeglslaLlon. 1he 1991 LCC ln Lhese areas does noL provlde an excluslve llsLlng of powers. lL may be sald LhaL LCus have resldual powers. 1hls ls conslsLenL wlLh Lhe llberal vlew of auLonomy whlch provldes LhaL LCus can exerclse: (1) Lhose powers expressly glven Lo Lhem, (2) Lhose powers lmplled from Lhe express powers, (3) Lhose powers noL glven Lo Lhe naLlonal CovernmenL or any governmenLal agency or lnsLrumenLallLy by law, (4) Lhose powers noL prohlblLed or forbldden by Lhe ConsLlLuLlon and sLaLuLes, (3) provlded Lhe powers are necessary for Lhe carrylng ouL of Lhe mandaLes and duLles enLrusLed Lo LCus wlLh Lhe end ln vlew of promoLlng Lhe general welfare ln response Lo local concerns and as agenLs of Lhe communlLles.
<&.(,$#2(/ "/: <&+(/+&/#%"#2(/
1. uevoluLlon refers Lo Lhe acL by whlch Lhe naLlonal governmenL confers power and auLhorlLy upon Lhe varlous LCs Lo perform speclflc funcLlons and responslblllLles (5ectloo 17je], 1991 lCc). 1he naLlonal governmenL shall, slx (6) monLhs afLer Lhe effecLlvlLy of Lhe 1991 LCC, effecL Lhe deconcenLraLlon of requlslLe auLhorlLy and power Lo Lhe approprlaLe reglonal offlces or fleld offlces of naLlonal agencles or offlces whose ma[or funcLlons are noL devolved Lo LCus (5ectloo 528, 1991 lCc).
1.1 1he power Lo regulaLe and responslblllLy Lo dellver baslc servlces are Lhe funcLlons devolved Lo LCs. Lxamples are (5ectloo 17je], 1991 lCc):
Notloool Covetomeot 8oslc 5etvlces keqolototy lowets ueparLmenL of AgrlculLure AgrlculLural exLenslon and on-slLe research lnspecLlon of meaL producLs ueparLmenL of LnvlronmenL and CommunlLy-based foresLry pro[ecLs LnforcemenL of envlronmenLal laws drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 17 naLural 8esources ueparLmenL of PealLh PealLh and hosplLal servlces CuaranLlne ueparLmenL of 1ransporLaLlon and CommunlcaLlons CperaLlon of 1rlcycles ueparLmenL of ubllc Works and Plghways ubllc works locally funded LnforcemenL of naLlonal 8ulldlng Code
1.2 uevoluLlon also lncludes Lhe Lransfer of personnel. uevolved personnel (former employees of Lhe naLlonal governmenL) may be reappolnLed by clLy mayor (llozo vs. cossloo, C.k. No. 1J6809, Ioly 27, 2004).
2. uevoluLlon ls a leglslaLlve acL. As Lo whaL sLaLe powers should be decenLrallzed and whaL may be delegaLed Lo LCs remalns a maLLer of pollcy, whlch concerns wlsdom. lL ls Lherefore a pollLlcal quesLlon (8osco vs. lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 91649, Moy 14, 1991).
3. 1here are Lwo levels of decenLrallzaLlon, l.e., admlnlsLraLlve or deconcenLraLlon, and pollLlcal or devoluLlon (ulsomooqcop vs. 5ectetoty of lobllc wotks ooJ nlqbwoys, C.k. No. 149848, Novembet 25, 2004, 5ectloos 17 ooJ 528, 1991 lCc).
AJmlolsttotlve ueceottollzotloo lolltlcol ueceottollzotloo ueconcenLraLlon uevoluLlon owers Lo be Lransferred noL speclfled owers Lo be Lransferred are speclfled 1ransfer ls from naLlonal governmenL agencles Lo lLs fleld offlces 1ransfer ls from naLlonal governmenL agencles Lo local governmenLs 1ransfer ls mandaLory 1ransfer ls mandaLory on Lhe devolvlng naLlonal governmenL agency and Lhe recelvlng local governmenL AdmlnlsLraLlve ln characLer owers, responslblllLles, personnel and resources 6-monLh deadllne from !anuary 1, 1992 6-monLh deadllne from !anuary 1, 1992
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 18
4. uevoluLlon enLalls Lhe Lransfer of powers from naLlonal governmenL agencles (Lransferor, source of power) Lo LCs (Lransferee, reclplenL of powers). owers noL devolved are reLalned by or remalns wlLh Lhe relevanL naLlonal governmenL agency.
4.1 1he regulaLory funcLlons of Lhe naLlonal olluLlon ConLrol Commlsslon were devolved Lo LCs. ursuanL Lo such devoluLlon, LCs may conducL lnspecLlons aL reasonable Llmes, wlLhouL dolng damage, afLer due noLlce Lo Lhe owners of bulldlngs, Lo ascerLaln compllance wlLh nolse sLandards under Lhe laws and order compllance LherewlLh, or suspend or cancel any bulldlng permlLs or clearance cerLlflcaLes afLer due hearlng (Ac otetptlses vs. ltobelle ltopettles cotpototloo, C.k. No. 166744, Novembet 2, 2006).
4.2 1he power Lo lssue permlLs and locaLlonal clearances for locally- slgnlflcanL pro[ecLs ls now lodged wlLh clLles and munlclpallLles wlLh a comprehenslve land use plans. 1he power of Lhe Pouslng Land use 8egulaLory 8oard (PLu88) Lo lssue locaLlonal clearance ls now llmlLed Lo pro[ecLs consldered Lo be of vlLal and naLlonal or reglonal economlc or envlronmenLal slgnlflcance. 1he power Lo acL as appellaLe body over declslons and acLlons of local and reglonal plannlng and zonlng bodles and depuLlzed offlclal of Lhe board was reLalned by Lhe PLu88. (llollo clty 2ooloq 8ootJ of AJjostmeot ooJ Appeols vs. Ceqoto-Abeclo looetol nomes, loc., C.k. No. 157118, uecembet 8, 200J).
4.3 ClLles now have Lhe power Lo regulaLe Lhe operaLlon of Lrlcycles-for-hlre and Lo granL franchlses for Lhe operaLlon Lhereof. 1he devolved power perLalns Lo Lhe franchlslng and regulaLory powers exerclsed by Lhe Land 1ransporLaLlon lranchlslng and 8egulaLory 8oard (L1l88) and noL lLs funcLlon Lo granL franchlses Lo oLher vehlcles, and noL Lhe funcLlons of Lhe Land 1ransporLaLlon Cfflce relaLlve Lo Lhe reglsLraLlon of moLor vehlcles and lssuances of llcenses for Lhe drlvlng Lhereof (looJ 1toospottotloo Offlce vs. clty of 8otooo, C.k. No. 1J1512, Iooooty 20, 2000).
4.4 1he ueparLmenL of LnvlronmenL and naLural 8esources reLalns Lhe power Lo conflscaLe and forfelL any conveyances uLlllzed ln vlolaLlon of Lhe loresLry Code or oLher foresL laws, rules and regulaLlons (loot vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 111107, Iooooty 10,1997). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 19
4.3 1he auLhorlLy Lo granL franchlses for Lhe operaLlon of [al-alal fronLons lles wlLh Congress, whlle Lhe regulaLory funcLlon ls vesLed wlLh Lhe Cames and AmusemenL 8oard (llm vs. locpoloq, C.k. No. 115044, Iooooty 27, 1995).
=>&+$#2.& ?$6&%.232(/
1. 1he SLaLe shall ensure Lhe auLonomy of local governmenLs (5ectloo 25, Attlcle ll, 1987 coostltotloo).
2. 1he resldenL of Lhe hlllpplnes shall exerclse general supervlslon over LCs. rovlnces wlLh respecL Lo componenL clLles and munlclpallLles, and clLles and munlclpallLles wlLh respecL Lo componenL barangays shall ensure LhaL Lhe acLs of Lhelr componenL unlLs are wlLhln Lhe scope of Lhelr prescrlbed powers and funcLlons (5ectloo 4, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo, 5ectloo 25, 1991 lCc).
2.2 1he resldenL exerclses general or lndlrecL supervlslon over provlnces wlLhln auLonomous reglons, componenL clLles, munlclpallLles, and barangays.
2.3 rovlnces exerclse dlrecL supervlslon over componenL clLles and munlclpallLles, and lndlrecL supervlslon over barangays.
2.4 ClLles and munlclpallLles exerclse dlrecL supervlslon over barangays.
3. 1he resldenL or Lhe hlgher" local governmenL has no power of conLrol over LCs and lower" LCs, respecLlvely (utlloo vs. llm, C.k. No. 112497, Aoqost 4, 1994, 5oclol Iostlce 5oclety vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 156052, lebtooty 1J, 2008, leyoes vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 14J596, uecembet 11, 200J).
3.1 ConLrol ls Lhe power of an offlcer Lo alLer or modlfy or seL aslde whaL a subordlnaLe offlcer had done ln Lhe performance of hls/her duLles and Lo subsLlLuLe Lhe [udgmenL of Lhe former for Lhe laLLer. An offlcer ln conLrol drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 20 lays down Lhe rules ln Lhe dolng of an acL. lL Lhey are noL followed, he/she may, ln hls/her dlscreLlon, order Lhe acL undone or re-done by hls/her subordlnaLe or he/she may even declde Lo do lL hlmself/herself (utlloo vs. llm, C.k. No. 112497, Aoqost 4, 1994, 5oclol Iostlce 5oclety vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 156052, lebtooty 1J, 2008, leyoes vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 14J596, uecembet 11, 200J).
3.2 Supervlslon ls Lhe power of a superlor offlcer Lo see Lo lL LhaL lower offlcers perform Lhelr funcLlons ls accordance wlLh law. 1he supervlsor or superlnLendenL merely sees Lo lL LhaL Lhe rules are followed, buL he/she hlmself/herself does noL lay down such rules, nor does he/she have Lhe dlscreLlon Lo modlfy or replace Lhem. lf Lhe rules are noL observed, he/she may order Lhe work done or re-done buL only Lo conform Lo Lhe prescrlbed rules. Pe/she may noL prescrlbe hls/her own manner for Lhe dolng of Lhe acL. Pe/she has no [udgmenL on Lhls maLLer excepL Lo see Lo lL LhaL Lhe rules are followed (utlloo vs. llm, C.k. No. 112497, Aoqost 4, 1994, 5oclol Iostlce 5oclety vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 156052, lebtooty 1J, 2008, leyoes vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 14J596, uecembet 11, 200J).
5opetvlsloo coottol Cverseelng Lnsure LhaL supervlsed unlL follows law/ rules Allows lnLerference lf supervlsed unlL acLed conLrary Lo law Cver acLor and acL 1here musL be a law Cnly lnvolves quesLlons of law (declare legal or lllegal), noL wlsdom or pollcy Lays down rules ln dolng of an acL lmpose llmlLaLlons when Lhere ls none lmposed by law ueclde for subordlnaLe or change declslon SubsLlLuLe [udgmenL over LhaL made by subordlnaLe AlLer wlsdom, law-conformlng [udgmenL or exerclse of dlscreLlon ulscreLlon Lo order acL undone or re- done rescrlbe manner by whlch acL ls done
4. Supervlslon lnvolves Lhe power Lo revlew of execuLlve orders and ordlnances, l.e., declare Lhem ulLra vlres or lllegal (5ectloos J0, 56 ooJ 57, 1991 lCc), Lhe power Lo dlsclpllne (SecLlon 61, 1991 LCC), Lhe power Lo lnLegraLe developmenL plans and drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 21 zonlng ordlnances (5ectloos 447, 458 ooJ 467, 1991 lCc), Lhe power Lo resolve boundary dlspuLes (5ectloo 118, 1991 lCc), Lhe power Lo approve leaves (5ectloo 47, 1991 lCc), accepL reslgnaLlons (5ectloo 82, 1991 lCc) and flll-up vacancles ln Lhe sooqqooloo (5ectloo 44, 1991 lCc), and Lhe power Lo augmenL baslc servlces (5ectloo 17, 1991 lCc).
3. An LCu can:
3.1 CranL and release Lhe dlsbursemenL for Lhe hosplLallzaLlon and healLh care lnsurance beneflLs of provlnclal offlclals and employees wlLhouL any prlor approval from Lhe resldenL slnce Lhere ls no law requlrlng prlor approval. lurLher, AdmlnlsLraLlve Crder no. 103 does noL cover local governmenLs (Neqtos OcclJeotol vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 182574, 5eptembet 28, 2010).
3.2 rovlde allowances Lo [udges, sub[ecL Lo avallablllLy of local funds. 1he ueparLmenL of 8udgeL of ManagemenL cannoL lmpose a cap on Lhe allowance slnce Lhere ls no law whlch llmlLs Lhe amounL, oLherwlse, Lhls wlll amounL Lo conLrol (leyoes vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 14J596, uecembet 11, 200J).
3.3 rovlde for addlLlonal allowances and oLher beneflLs Lo naLlonal governmenL offlclals sLaLloned or asslgned Lo a munlclpallLy or clLy, provlded LhaL Lhe granL of beneflLs does noL run ln confllcL wlLh oLher sLaLuLes (vllloteoo vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 145J8J-84, Aoqost 6, 200J).
3.4 LnacL Lax ordlnances, sub[ecL Lo revlew by Lhe SecreLary of !usLlce, Lo ascerLaln Lhe consLlLuLlonallLy or legallLy Lhereof. 1he SecreLary however, has no Lhe rlghL Lo declare Lhe Lax measure un[usL, excesslve, oppresslve or conflscaLory, or dlrecL Lhe subsLlLuLlon of provlslons slnce Lhls wlll amounL Lo conLrol (utlloo vs. llm, C.k. No. 112497, Aoqost 4, 1994).
3.3 LxproprlaLe agrlculLural land wlLhouL securlng approval from Lhe ueparLmenL of Agrarlan 8eform (uA8) slnce Lhere ls no law whlch requlres Lhls. uA8's auLhorlLy ls conflned Lo Lhe converslon of agrlculLural lands (comotloes 5ot vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 175604, 5eptembet 18, 2009).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 22 3.6 8eclasslfy lands from resldenLlal Lo non-agrlculLural lands wlLhouL uA8 approval as Lhere ls no law mandaLlng such approval (losooq 8oyobos lotmets Assoclotloo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 142J59 / 142980, Moy 25, 2004).
3.7 LlecL represenLaLlves Lo Lhe naLlonal Llga ng mga 8arangay. 1he ueparLmenL of lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL cannoL appolnL an lnLerlm careLaker Lo manage and admlnlsLer Lhe affalrs of Lhe Llga as Lhls would vlolaLe local auLonomy (Notloool llqo oq mqo 8otooqoy vs. loteJes, C.k. Nos. 1J0775/ 1J19J9, 5eptembet 27, 2004).
6. Powever, an LCu cannoL:
6.1 Co beyond Lhe requlremenLs seL forLh ln Lhe CockflghLlng Law desplLe Lhe facL LhaL cockflghLlng ls a devolved power. lurLher, Lhe CockflghLlng Law has noL been repealed (1oo vs. leteoo, C.k. No. 14974J, lebtooty 18, 2005).
6.2 AuLhorlze Lhe clLy admlnlsLraLor Lo acL on vlolaLlons of Lhe naLlonal 8ulldlng Code slnce under Lhe law, only Lhe clLy englneer, as Lhe bulldlng offlclal, has Lhe excluslve auLhorlLy Lo acL on maLLers relaLlng Lo Lhe lssuance of demollLlon permlLs or Lhe revocaLlon or suspenslon Lhereof (leople of tbe lblllpploes vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 144159, 5eptembet 29, 2004).
6.3 8egulaLe Lhe subscrlber raLes charged by Cable 1elevlslon operaLors wlLhln lLs LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlon slnce Lhls power ls vesLed wlLh Lhe naLlonal 1elecommunlcaLlons Commlsslon (n1C) Lo Lhe excluslon of oLher bodles (8otooqos cA1v vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 1J8810, Octobet 20, 2004).
6.4 ln Lhe absence of consLlLuLlonal or leglslaLlve auLhorlzaLlon, granL franchlses Lo cable Lelevlslon operaLors as Lhls power has been delegaLed Lo Lhe n1C (2oomzot vs. leople of tbe lblllpploes, C.k. No. 1J55J5, lebtooty 14, 2005).
7. lnsofar as Lhe resldenL, LxecuLlve 8ranch, naLlonal CovernmenL Agencles and Cuasl-CorporaLlons are concerned:
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 23 7.1 1he resldenL has Lhe power Lo dlsclpllne errlng local elecLlve offlclals. 1he power Lo dlsclpllne ls noL lncompaLlble wlLh supervlslon (Iosoo vs. 1ottes, C.k. No. 1J1255, Moy 20, 1998). Supervlslon and lnvesLlgaLlon are noL lnconslsLenL Lerms. lnvesLlgaLlon does noL slgnlfy conLrol, a power whlch Lhe resldenL does noL have (Coozoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 9J252, Aoqost 5, 1991).
7.2 he hlllpplne AmusemenL and Camlng CorporaLlon (ACCC8) Lhen can seL up caslnos even wlLhouL Lhe approval of Lhe LCs as Lhe charLer of ACCC8 empowers lL Lo cenLrallze gambllng (Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994).
7.3 1he Laguna Lake uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy (LLuA), pursuanL Lo lLs charLer, can order Lhe dlsmanLllng of flshpens. Laguna de 8ay Lherefore cannoL be sub[ecLed Lo fragmenLed concepLs of managemenL pollcles where lakeshore LCs exerclse excluslve domlnlon over speclflc porLlons of Lhe lake waLer (loqooo loke uevelopmeot Aotbotlty vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 120865-71, uecembet 7, 1995).
7.4 1he LLuA, pursuanL Lo lLs mandaLe, can lssue cease and deslsL orders agalnsL LCs Lo sLop Lhe dumplng of lLs garbage ln an open dumpslLe (loqooo loke uevelopmeot Aotbotlty, C.k. No. 110120, Motcb 16, 1994).
*&@23,"#2.& 7(/#%(,
1. 1he SLaLe shall ensure Lhe auLonomy of local governmenLs (5ectloo 25, Attlcle ll, 1987 coostltotloo).
2. Congress reLalns conLrol of Lhe local governmenLs alLhough ln slgnlflcanLly reduced degree now Lhan under prevlous ConsLlLuLlons. 1he power Lo creaLe sLlll lncludes Lhe power Lo desLroy. 1he power Lo granL sLlll lncludes Lhe power Lo wlLhhold or recall. 1he naLlonal LeglslaLure ls sLlll Lhe prlnclpal of Lhe LCs, whlch cannoL defy lLs wlll or modlfy or vlolaLe lLs laws (Moqtojos vs. ltyce ltopettles ooJ lblllpploe Amosemeots ooJ Comloq cotpototloo, C.k. No. 111097, Ioly 20, 1994).
3. under Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon, Congress has Lhe power Lo:
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 24 3.1 AllocaLe among Lhe dlfferenL local governmenL unlLs Lhelr powers, responslblllLles, and resources, and provlde for Lhe quallflcaLlons, elecLlon, appolnLmenL and removal, Lerm, salarles, powers and funcLlons and duLles of local offlclals, and all oLher maLLers relaLlng Lo Lhe organlzaLlon and operaLlon of Lhe local unlLs (5ectloo J, Attlcle \).
3.2 rescrlbe guldellnes and llmlLaLlons sources of local governmenL revenues and local power Lo levy Laxes, fees, and charges provlded Lhese are conslsLenL wlLh Lhe baslc pollcy of local auLonomy (5ectloo 5, Attlcle \).
3.3 ueLermlne Lhe [usL share ln Lhe naLlonal Laxes of local governmenLs (5ectloo 6, Attlcle \).
3.4 rovlde Lhe manner by whlch local governmenLs recelve Lhelr equlLable share ln Lhe proceeds of Lhe uLlllzaLlon and developmenL of Lhe naLlonal wealLh wlLhln Lhelr respecLlve areas (5ectloo 7, Attlcle \).
3.3 SeL Lhe Lerm llmlLs of barangay offlclals (5ectloo 8, Attlcle \).
3.6 rescrlbe Lhe manner by whlch secLoral represenLaLlves shall be lnsLalled ln local leglslaLlve bodles (5ectloo 9, Attlcle \).
3.7 ueflne Lhe crlLerla for Lhe creaLlon, dlvlslon, merger, abollLlon and subsLanLlal alLeraLlon of boundarles of local governmenLs (5ectloo 10, Attlcle \).
3.8 ass Lhe organlc acL of Lhe auLonomous reglons (5ectloo 18, Attlcle \).
4. Congress exerclses conLrol over Lhe properLles of LCs.
4.1 ArLlcle 424 of Lhe Clvll Code lays down Lhe baslc prlnclples LhaL properLles of Lhe publlc domlnlon devoLed Lo publlc use and made avallable Lo Lhe publlc ln general are ouLslde Lhe commerce of men (persons) and cannoL be dlsposed of or leased by Lhe LCu Lo prlvaLe persons (Mocoslooo vs. ulokoo, C.k. oo. 97764, Aoqost 10, 1992).
4.2 ursuanL Lo Lhe 8egallan docLrlne, any land LhaL has never been acqulred Lhrough purchase, granL or any oLher mode of acqulslLlon remalns parL of drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 23 Lhe publlc domaln and ls owned by Lhe SLaLe. LCs cannoL approprlaLe Lo Lhemselves publlc lands wlLhouL prlor granL from Lhe governmenL (kotol 8ook of AoJo vs. komoo cotbollc Atcbblsbop of lloqoyeo-uoqopoo, C.k. No. 155051, Moy 21, 2007).
4.3 A loL comprlslng Lhe publlc plaza ls properLy of publlc domlnlon, hence, noL suscepLlble Lo prlvaLe ownershlp by Lhe church or by Lhe munlclpallLy (komoo cotbollc 8lsbop of kollbo, Akloo vs. Moolclpollty of 8otoooqo, Akloo, C.k. No. 149145, Motcb J1, 2006).
4.4 A clLy can valldly reconvey a porLlon of lLs sLreeL LhaL has been closed or wlLhdrawn from publlc use where Congress has speclflcally delegaLed Lo such pollLlcal subdlvlslon, Lhrough lLs charLer, Lhe auLhorlLy Lo regulaLe lLs sLreeLs. Such properLy wlLhdrawn from publlc servlLude Lo be used or conveyed for any purpose for whlch oLher properLy belonglng Lo Lhe clLy may be lawfully used or conveyed (llqotocloo vs. llbl, C.k. No. 155688 Novembet 28, 2007).
?723 L5 ?'%"!C 'D )'*+) ,'#"!(-"(.C
<&,&@"#2(/ "/: A/#&%6%&#"#2(/ () B(C&%3
1. LCs have consLlLuLlonal, sLaLuLory and [urlsprudenLlal powers.
1.1 1he sources of powers of LCs are Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon, Lhe 1991 LCC, sLaLuLes, charLers of LCs and [urlsprudence or case law.
1.2 1he power Lo Lax ls a consLlLuLlonal (5ectloo 5, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo) and sLaLuLory power (5ectloo 18, 1991 lCc). CLher Lhan Lhe 1991 LCC, 8epubllc AcL no. 7303 or Lhe Magna CarLa for ubllc PealLh Workers, 8epubllc AcL no. 7883 or Lhe 8arangay PealLh Workers' 8eneflLs and lncenLlves AcL of 1993, among oLhers, are Lhe sLaLuLes LhaL govern LCs. 1he Supreme CourL ln Lhe case of lmenLel vs. Agulrre (C.8. no. 132988, !uly 19, 2000) declared LhaL LCs have flscal auLonomy.
1.3 ConsLlLuLlonal powers cannoL be repealed or modlfled by Congress save ln a consLlLuLlonal amendmenL. SLaLuLes can be repealed or modlfled by drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 26 Congress. owers deflned or lnLerpreLed by Lhe Supreme CourL can be re- deflned and re-lnLerpreLed by lL.
1.4 1here are oLher classlflcaLlons of LCu powers: (1) governmenLal (e.g. power Lo leglslaLe) and proprleLary (e.g. operaLlng a publlc markeL), (2) codal-1991 LCC (e.g. power Lo close local roads) and non-codal (e.g. power of operaLlonal conLrol over pollce under 8epubllc AcLs nos. 6973 and 8331, devoluLlon of Lralnlng servlces under Lhe 1echnlcal LducaLlon and Skllls uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy pursuanL Lo 8epubllc AcL no. 7796), (3) sLaLe-delegaLed (e.g. pollce power) and devolved (e.g. barangay daycare cenLers), (4) express (e.g. power Lo creaLe an offlce) and lmplled (e.g. power Lo abollsh LhaL offlce, (3) execuLlve (e.g. power Lo veLo an ordlnance) and leglslaLlve (e.g. power Lo enacL an ordlnance), (6) general leglslaLlve (e.g. power Lo lssue buslness permlLs) and pollce power proper (e.g. power Lo lmpose a curfew), (7) lnLramural (e.g. power of emlnenL domaln) and exLramural (e.g. pollce purposes), (8) mandaLory (e.g. power Lo dellver baslc servlces as parL of devoluLlon) and dlscreLlonary (e.g. power Lo exproprlaLe a plece of properLy), (9) lnLernal (e.g. power Lo adopL Lhe sooqqooloo lnLernal rules of procedure) and exLernal (e.g. power Lo enacL a zonlng ordlnance), and (10) speclflc Lo an LCu (e.g. power Lo leglslaLe) and lnLer-LCu (e.g. power Lo enLer lnLo a collaboraLlve alllance wlLh oLher LCs).
2. Congress allocaLe[s] among Lhe dlfferenL local governmenL unlLs Lhelr powers, responslblllLles, and resources, and provlde for Lhe quallflcaLlons, elecLlon, appolnLmenL and removal, Lerm, salarles, powers and funcLlons and duLles of local offlclals, and all oLher maLLers relaLlng Lo Lhe organlzaLlon and operaLlon of Lhe local unlLs" (5ectloo J, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
3. 1he followlng are Lhe rules of lnLerpreLaLlon of Lhe powers of LCs:
3.1 Where a law ls capable of Lwo lnLerpreLaLlons, one ln favor of cenLrallzed power and Lhe oLher beneflclal Lo local auLonomy, Lhe scales musL be welghed ln favor of auLonomy (5oo Iooo vs. clvll 5etvlce commlssloo, C.k. No. 92299, Aptll 19, 1991).
3.2 Any provlslon on a power of an LCu shall be llberally lnLerpreLed ln lLs favor, and ln case of doubL, any quesLlon Lhereon shall be resolved ln drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 27 favor of devoluLlon of powers and of Lhe lower LCu (5ectloo 5jo], 1991 lCc).
3.3 Any falr and reasonable doubL as Lo Lhe exlsLence of Lhe power shall be lnLerpreLed ln favor of Lhe LCu concerned (5ectloo 5jo], 1991 lCc).
a. Conslderlng LhaL Lhe powers of Lhe ueparLmenL of Lnergy regardlng Lhe andacan 1ermlnals" are noL caLegorlcal, any doubL as Lo Lhe valldlLy of a zonlng ordlnance dlsallowlng Lhe malnLenance of such Lermlnals musL be resolved ln favor of Lhe ordlnance's valldlLy (5oclol Iostlce 5oclety vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 156052, lebtooty 1J, 2008).
b. Whlle Lhe law dld noL expressly vesL on provlnclal governmenLs Lhe power Lo abollsh LhaL offlce, absenL, however, any conLrary provlslon, LhaL auLhorlLy should be deemed embraced by lmpllcaLlon from Lhe power Lo creaLe lL (Iovlet vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. l-49065, Iooe, 1, 1994).
c. 1he provlslon ln Lhe clLy charLer on Lhe local power Lo provlde for Lhe malnLenance of waLerworks for supplylng waLer Lo Lhe lnhablLanLs of Lhe clLy does noL carry wlLh lL Lhe rlghL and auLhorlLy Lo approprlaLe waLer. (8oeoJlo vs. clty of lllqoo, C.k. No. 1J2209, Aptll 29, 2005).
d. SLaLuLes conferrlng Lhe power of emlnenL domaln Lo pollLlcal subdlvlslons cannoL be broadened or consLrlcLed by lmpllcaLlon (ltovloce of comotloes 5ot vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 175604, 5eptembet 18, 2009).
3.4 ln case of doubL, any Lax ordlnance or revenue measure shall be consLrued sLrlcLly agalnsL Lhe LCu enacLlng lL, and llberally ln favor of Lhe Laxpayer. Any Lax exempLlon, lncenLlve or rellef granLed by any LCu pursuanL Lo Lhe provlslons of Lhls Code shall be consLrued sLrlcLly agalnsL Lhe person clalmlng lL (5ectloo 5jb], 1991 lCc).
3.3 1he general welfare provlslons ln Lhe 1991 LCC shall be llberally lnLerpreLed Lo glve more powers Lo LCs ln acceleraLlng economlc developmenL and upgradlng Lhe quallLy of llfe for Lhe people ln Lhe communlLy (5ectloo 5jc], 1991 lCc).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 28 3.6 8lghLs and obllgaLlons exlsLlng on Lhe daLe of effecLlvlLy of Lhe 1991 LCC and arlslng ouL of conLracLs or any oLher source of presenLaLlon lnvolvlng an LCu shall be governed by Lhe orlglnal Lerms and condlLlons of sald conLracLs or Lhe law ln force aL Lhe Llme such rlghLs were vesLed (5ectloo 5jJ], 1991 lCc).
3.7 ln Lhe resoluLlon of conLroversles arlslng under Lhe 1991 LCC where no legal provlslon or [urlsprudence applles, resorL may be had Lo Lhe cusLoms and LradlLlons ln Lhe place where Lhe conLroversles Lake place (5ectloo 5je], 1991 lCc).
3.8 ln lnLerpreLlng sLaLuLory provlslons on munlclpal flscal powers, doubLs wlll have Lo be resolved ln favor of munlclpal corporaLlons (5oo loblo clty vs. keyes, C.k. No. 127708, Motcb 25, 1999).
3.9 ln case of doubL, any Lax ordlnance or revenue measure shall be consLrued sLrlcLly agalnsL Lhe local governmenL unlL enacLlng lL, and llberally ln favor of Lhe Laxpayer. Any Lax exempLlon, lncenLlve or rellef granLed by any local governmenL unlL pursuanL Lo Lhe provlslons of 1991 Local governmenL Code shall be consLrued sLrlcLly agalnsL Lhe person clalmlng lL. (SecLlon 3[b], 1991 LCC) 1he general welfare provlslons ln Lhe 1991 Local CovernmenL Code shall be llberally lnLerpreLed Lo glve more powers Lo local governmenL unlLs ln acceleraLlng economlc developmenL and upgradlng Lhe quallLy of llfe for Lhe people ln Lhe communlLy. (SecLlon 3[c], 1991 LCC)
B(,2+& B(C&%
1. ollce power of local governmenLs ls a sLaLuLory delegaLed power under SecLlon 16 of Lhe 1991 LCC. 1he general welfare clause ls Lhe delegaLlon ln sLaLuLory form of Lhe pollce power of Lhe SLaLe Lo LCs (Moollo vs. loqolo, C.k. No. 118127, Aptll 12, 2005, tmlto-Molote notel ooJ Motel Opetotloos Assoclotloo, loc., vs. Moyot of Moollo, C.k. No. l-2469J, Ioly J1, 1967).
2. 1he Ceneral Welfare Clause under Lhe 1991 LCC sLaLes: Lvery local governmenL unlL shall exerclse Lhe powers expressly granLed, Lhose necessarlly lmplled Lherefrom, as well as powers necessary, approprlaLe, or lncldenLal for lLs efflclenL and effecLlve governance, and Lhose whlch are essenLlal Lo Lhe promoLlon of Lhe drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 29 general welfare. WlLhln Lhelr respecLlve LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlons, local governmenL unlLs shall ensure and supporL, among oLher Lhlngs, Lhe preservaLlon and enrlchmenL of culLure, promoLe healLh and safeLy, enhance Lhe rlghL of Lhe people Lo a balanced ecology, encourage and supporL Lhe developmenL of approprlaLe and self-rellanL sclenLlflc and Lechnologlcal capablllLles, lmprove publlc morals, enhance economlc prosperlLy and soclal [usLlce, promoLe full employmenL among Lhelr resldenLs, malnLaln peace and order, and preserve Lhe comforL and convenlence of Lhelr lnhablLanLs" (5ectloo 16).
3. lor a valld exerclse of pollce power, Lwo requlslLes musL concur: (1) Lawful Sub[ecL (subsLanLlve due process, equal proLecLlon, publlc lnLeresL requlres lnLerference), ooJ (2) Lawful MeLhod (procedural due process, reasonable means Lo achleve Lhe purpose) (loceoo CtooJ ceottol 1etmlool vs. IAc lloet, C.k. No. 148JJ9, lebtooty 2J, 2005).
1.1 An LCu ls consldered Lo have properly exerclsed lLs pollce powers only when Lhe followlng requlslLes are meL: (1) Lhe lnLeresLs of Lhe publlc generally, as dlsLlngulshed from Lhose of a parLlcular class, requlre Lhe lnLerference of Lhe SLaLe, and (2) Lhe means employed are reasonably necessary for Lhe aLLalnmenL of Lhe ob[ecL soughL Lo be accompllshed and are noL unduly oppresslve. 1he flrsL requlremenL refers Lo Lhe equal proLecLlon clause, and Lhe second Lo Lhe due process clause of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon (lotoyoo vs. Iovellooos, C.k. No. 148408 Ioly 14, 2006, loceoo CtooJ ceottol 1etmlool vs. IAc lloet, C.k. No. 148JJ9, lebtooty 2J, 2005).
1.2 1he power Lo esLabllsh zones for lndusLrlal, commerclal and resldenLlal uses ls derlved from Lhe pollce power lLself and ls exerclsed for Lhe proLecLlon and beneflL of Lhe resldenLs of a locallLy (5oclol Iostlce 5oclety vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 156052, lebtooty 1J, 2008).
1.3 A munlclpallLy falled Lo comply wlLh Lhe due process clause when lL passed a 8esoluLlon orderlng Lhe closure/Lransfer of a gasollne sLaLlon where lL dld noL even aLLempL Lo deLermlne lf Lhere was an acLual vlolaLlon of a zonlng ordlnance (lotoyoo vs. Iovellooos, C.k. No. 148408 Ioly 14, 2006).
1.4 An ordlnance almed aL rellevlng Lrafflc congesLlon meeLs Lhe flrsL sLandard. Powever, declarlng bus Lermlnals as nulsance pet se or publlc drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 30 nulsances and orderlng Lhelr closure or relocaLlon conLravenes Lhe second sLandard. 1ermlnals are noL publlc nulsances. 1helr operaLlon ls a leglLlmaLe buslness whlch, by lLself, cannoL be sald Lo be ln[urlous Lo Lhe rlghLs of properLy, healLh, or comforL of Lhe communlLy (loceoo CtooJ ceottol 1etmlool vs. IAc lloet, C.k. No. 148JJ9, lebtooty 2J, 2005).
2. 1he general welfare clause has Lwo branches (kotol 8ook of Mokotl vs. Moolclpollty of Mokotl, C.k. No. 15076J Ioly 02, 2004).
2.1 1he flrsL, known as Lhe general leglslaLlve power, auLhorlzes Lhe local leglslaLlve councll Lo enacL ordlnances and make regulaLlons noL repugnanL Lo law, as may be necessary Lo carry lnLo effecL and dlscharge Lhe powers and duLles conferred upon Lhe local leglslaLlve councll by law (kotol 8ook of Mokotl vs. Moolclpollty of Mokotl, C.k. No. 15076J Ioly 02, 2004).
2.2 1he second, known as Lhe pollce power proper, auLhorlzes Lhe local governmenL Lo enacL ordlnances as may be necessary and proper for Lhe healLh and safeLy, prosperlLy, morals, peace, good order, comforL, and convenlence of Lhe munlclpallLy and lLs lnhablLanLs, and for Lhe proLecLlon of Lhelr properLy (kotol 8ook of Mokotl vs. Moolclpollty of Mokotl, C.k. No. 15076J Ioly 02, 2004).
3. ln Lhe exerclse of pollce power, an LCu can:
3.1 lssue zonlng classlflcaLlon. A zonlng ordlnance ls deflned as a local clLy or munlclpal leglslaLlon whlch loglcally arranges, prescrlbed, deflnes and apporLlons a glven pollLlcal subdlvlslon lnLo speclflc land uses as presenL and fuLure pro[ecLlon of needs (losooq 8oyobos lotmets Assoclotloo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. Nos. 142J59/ 142980, Moy 25, 2004).
3.2 rohlblL Lhe expanslon of a hosplLal based on Lhe approved a new zonlng ordlnance ldenLlfylng anoLher zone for hosplLals, buL whlch allowed exlsLlng sLrucLures Lo conLlnue ln Lhelr presenL locaLlon (uelfloo vs. 5t. Iomes nospltol, loc., C.k. No. 1667J5, Novembet 2J, 2007).
3.3 8esLrlcL Lhe use of properLy slnce conLracLual resLrlcLlons on Lhe use of properLy could noL prevall over Lhe reasonable exerclse of pollce power Lhrough zonlng regulaLlons (uolteJ 8l nomes vs. clty Moyot of drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 31 lotooopoe, C.k. 41010, lebtooty 07, 2007, Ottlqos & co. vs. leotl 8ook ooJ 1tost co., C.k. No. l-24670, uecembet 14, 1979).
3.4 8egulaLe Lhe consLrucLlon of warehouses whereln lnflammable maLerlals are sLored where such warehouses are locaLed aL a dlsLance of 200 meLers from a block of houses and noL Lhe consLrucLlon pet se of a warehouse (1otel vs. Moolclpollty of vltoc, C.k. No. 4024J, Motcb 11, 1992).
3.3 Crder Lhe closure and padlocklng of a planL causlng polluLlon when Lhe closure was ln response Lo complalnLs of resldenLs, afLer an lnvesLlgaLlon was conducLed, when Lhere was no bulldlng permlL from Lhe hosL munlclpallLy, and when Lhe Lemporary permlL Lo operaLe by Lhe naLlonal olluLlon ConLrol Commlsslon has explred (1ecbooloqy uevelopets, loc. vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 94759, Iooooty 21, 1991).
4. Powever, an LCu cannoL:
4.1 rohlblL Lhe operaLlon of sauna and massage parlors, karaoke bars, beerhouses, nlghL clubs, day clubs, super clubs, dlscoLheques, cabareLs, dance halls, moLels, lnns or order Lhelr Lransfer or converslon wlLhouL lnfrlnglng Lhe consLlLuLlonal guaranLees of due process and equal proLecLlon of laws noL even under Lhe gulse of pollce power (tmlto- Molote notel ooJ Motel Opetotloos Assoclotloo, loc., vs. Moyot of Moollo, C.k. No. l-2469J, Ioly J1, 1967).
4.2 LnacL an ordlnance prevenLlng moLels from offerlng wash raLes and renLlng ouL a room more Lhan once a day ls an unreasonable exerclse of pollce power where Lhe behavlor whlch Lhe ordlnance seeks Lo curLall (l.e., prosLlLuLlon, use of llllclL drugs) ls already prohlblLed and can be curLalled by applylng exlsLlng laws (wbltellqbt cotpototloo vs. clty of Moollo, C.k. No. 122846, Iooooty 20, 2009).
4.3 rohlblL Lhe operaLlon of nlghLclubs. 1hey may be regulaLed, buL noL prevenLed from carrylng on Lhelr buslness (uelo ctoz vs. lotos, C.k. Nos. l-42571-72, Ioly 25, 198J).
4.4 Modlfy Lhe Lerms of an appllcaLlon for a publlc assembly permlL wlLhouL even lndlcaLlng how Lhe clLy mayor arrlved aL such a declslon agalnsL Lhe drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 32 sLandard of Lhe clear and presenL danger LesL (loteqtoteJ 8ot of tbe lblllpploes vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 175241, lebtooty 24, 2010).
4.3 lmpose an absoluLe ban on publlc assemblles. A mayor, however, can deny Lhe lssuance of a rally permlL on Lhe ground of clear and presenL danger Lo publlc order, publlc safeLy, publlc convenlence, publlc morals or publlc healLh (8oyoo vs. tmlto, C.k. No. 1698J8, Aptll 25, 2006).
4.6 8egulaLe Lhe pracLlce of a professlon, llke LhaL of opLomeLry, Lhrough Lhe lssuance of a permlL. Such a funcLlon ls wlLhln Lhe excluslve domaln of Lhe admlnlsLraLlve agency speclflcally empowered by law Lo supervlse Lhe professlon, l.e., rofesslonal 8egulaLlons Commlsslon and Lhe 8oard of Lxamlners ln CpLomeLry (AcebeJo Optlcol vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 100152 Motcb J1, 2000).
4.7 Cause Lhe summary abaLemenL of concreLe posLs where Lhe posLs dld noL pose any hazard Lo Lhe safeLy of persons and properLy buL merely posed an lnconvenlence Lo Lhe publlc by blocklng Lhe free passage of people Lo and from Lhe naLlonal road. 1he posL ls noL nulsance pet se (1elmo vs. 8ostomoote, C.k. No. 182567, Ioly 1J, 2009).
4.8 Cause Lhe desLrucLlon of quonseL bulldlng where copra ls sLored slnce Lhls ls a leglLlmaLe buslness. 8y lLs naLure, lL cannoL be sald Lo be ln[urlous Lo rlghLs of properLy, of healLh or of comforL of Lhe communlLy. lf lL ls a nulsance pet occlJeos lL may be so proven ln a hearlng conducLed for LhaL purpose (stote ltooclsco vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 95279, Ioly 26, 1991).
4.9 Crder Lhe closure of a bank for non-paymenL of Laxes slnce Lhe approprlaLe remedles Lo enforce paymenL of dellnquenL Laxes or fees are provlded ln SecLlon 62 of Lhe Local 1ax Code. Closure ls noL a remedy (kotol 8ook of Mokotl vs. Moolclpollty of Mokotl, C.k. No. 15076J, Ioly 02, 2004).
3. no compensaLlon ls needed Lo be pald by Lhe LCu as Lhere ls no compensable Laklng ln Lhe condemnaLlon of prlvaLe properLy under pollce power. roperLy condemned under pollce power ls usually noxlous or lnLended for a noxlous purpose (ulJlplo ottb-5ovets Moltl-lotpose Assoclotloo vs. Cozoo, C.k. No. 157882, Motcb J0, 2006). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 33
3.1 ln Lhe exerclse of pollce power, properLy rlghLs of prlvaLe lndlvlduals are sub[ecLed Lo resLralnLs and burdens ln order Lo secure Lhe general comforL, healLh, and prosperlLy of Lhe sLaLe. Where a properLy lnLeresL ls merely resLrlcLed because Lhe conLlnued use Lhereof would be ln[urlous Lo publlc welfare, or where properLy ls desLroyed because lLs conLlnued exlsLence would be ln[urlous Lo publlc lnLeresL, Lhere ls no compensable Laklng (ulJlplo ottb-5ovets Moltl-lotpose Assoclotloo vs. Cozoo, C.k. No. 157882, Motcb J0, 2006).
3.2 ln Lhe exerclse of lLs pollce power regulaLlon, Lhe sLaLe resLrlcLs Lhe use of prlvaLe properLy, buL none of Lhe properLy lnLeresLs ln Lhe bundle of rlghLs whlch consLlLuLe ownershlp ls approprlaLed for use by or for Lhe beneflL of Lhe publlc (ulJlplo ottb-5ovets Moltl-lotpose Assoclotloo vs. Cozoo, C.k. No. 157882, Motcb J0, 2006).
=02/&/# <(0"2/
1. LmlnenL uomaln ls a sLaLuLory power of LCs. 1he 1991 LCC deflnes Lhe power and enumeraLes Lhe requlremenLs, Lo wlL: A local governmenL unlL may, Lhrough lLs chlef execuLlve and acLlng pursuanL Lo an ordlnance, exerclse Lhe power of emlnenL domaln for publlc use, or purpose or welfare for Lhe beneflL of Lhe poor and Lhe landless, upon paymenL of [usL compensaLlon, pursuanL Lo Lhe provlslons of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon and perLlnenL laws: rovlded, however, 1haL Lhe power of emlnenL domaln may noL be exerclsed unless a valld and deflnlLe offer has been prevlously made Lo Lhe owner, and such offer was noL accepLed: rovlded, furLher, 1haL Lhe local governmenL unlL may lmmedlaLely Lake possesslon of Lhe properLy upon Lhe flllng of Lhe exproprlaLlon proceedlngs and upon maklng a deposlL wlLh Lhe proper courL of aL leasL flfLeen percenL (13) of Lhe falr markeL value of Lhe properLy based on Lhe currenL Lax declaraLlon of Lhe properLy Lo be exproprlaLed: rovlded, flnally, 1haL, Lhe amounL Lo be pald for Lhe exproprlaLed properLy shall be deLermlned by Lhe proper courL, based on Lhe falr markeL value aL Lhe Llme of Lhe Laklng of Lhe properLy." (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
2. 1he power of emlnenL domaln delegaLed Lo LCs ls ln reallLy noL emlnenL buL lnferlor." Congress ls sLlll Lhe prlnclpal of LCs, and Lhe laLLer cannoL go agalnsL Lhe prlnclpal's wlll or modlfy Lhe same (8eloso vs. Moolclpollty of loooy, C.k. No. 15J974, Aoqost 07, 2006). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 34
3. ln Lhe exerclse of Lhe power of emlnenL domaln, lL ls baslc LhaL Lhe Laklng of prlvaLe properLy musL be for a publlc purpose (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
3.1 ubllc use ls deflned as whaLever ls beneflclally employed for Lhe communlLy (8otooqoy 5loJoloo, 5oo letoooJo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 150640, Motcb 22, 2007).
3.2 lf Lhe lnLended feeder road wlll only beneflL Lhe resldenLs of a prlvaLe subdlvlslon, Lhen Lhere ls no valld purpose (8otooqoy 5loJoloo, 5oo letoooJo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 150640, Motcb 22, 2007).
3.3 1he ordlnance musL show why Lhe sub[ecL properLy was slngled ouL for exproprlaLlon or whaL necesslLy lmpelled Lhe parLlcular cholce or selecLlon (loqcoo vs. lobto, C.k. No. 155746, Octobet 1J, 2004).
4. 1o [usLlfy Lhe paymenL of [usL compensaLlon, Lhere musL be compensable Laklng. 1he exproprlaLed properLy musL be used afLer Laklng (ulJlplo ottb-5ovets Moltl- lotpose Assoclotloo vs. Cozoo, C.k. 157882, Motcb J0, 2006).
4.1 When a properLy lnLeresL ls approprlaLed and applled Lo some publlc purpose, Lhere ls compensable Laklng.
1he deprlvaLlon of use can ln facL be LoLal and lL wlll noL consLlLuLe compensable Laklng lf nobody else acqulres use of Lhe properLy or any lnLeresL Lhereln. lf, however, ln Lhe regulaLlon of Lhe use of Lhe properLy, somebody else acqulres Lhe use or lnLeresL Lhereof, such resLrlcLlon consLlLuLes compensable Laklng (ulJlplo ottb-5ovets Moltl-lotpose Assoclotloo vs. Cozoo, C.k. 157882, Motcb J0, 2006).
4.2 Crderlng a parLlcular Lype of buslness Lo wlnd up, Lransfer, relocaLe or converL Lo an allowable Lype of buslness ln effecL permanenLly resLrlcLs Lhe use of properLy and Lhus goes beyond regulaLlon. !usL compensaLlon ls Lherefore requlred (Moollo vs. loqolo, C.k. No. 118127, Aptll 12, 2005).
3. 1he foundaLlon of Lhe rlghL Lo exerclse emlnenL domaln ls genulne necesslLy and LhaL necesslLy musL be of publlc characLer (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
3.1 CovernmenL may noL caprlclously or arblLrarlly choose whlch prlvaLe properLy should be exproprlaLed. 1he condemnor musL show Lhe drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 33 necesslLy (Iesos ls lotJ cbtlstloo 5cbool loooJotloo vs. loslq, C.k. No. 1522J0, Aoqost 09, 2005, Meycooyoo vs. lotetmeJlote Appellote coott, C.k. No. 72126, Iooooty 29, 1988).
3.2 1he clalm of Lhe LCu LhaL Lhe plece of properLy ls Lhe shorLesL and mosL sulLable access road" and LhaL Lhe loL has been surveyed as Lhe besL posslble lngress and egress" musL be proven by a showlng of a preponderance of evldence (Iesos ls lotJ cbtlstloo 5cbool loooJotloo vs. loslq, C.k. No. 1522J0, Aoqost 09, 2005).
3.3 1he rlghL Lo Lake prlvaLe properLy for publlc purposes necessarlly orlglnaLes from Lhe necesslLy and Lhe Laklng musL be llmlLed Lo such necesslLy. 1here ls no genulne necesslLy when Laklng of prlvaLe properLy ls done for Lhe beneflL of a small communlLy whlch seeks Lo have lLs own sporLs and recreaLlonal faclllLy, noLwlLhsLandlng Lhe facL LhaL Lhere ls a recreaLlonal faclllLy only a shorL dlsLance away (Moslklp vs. clty of loslq, C.k. No. 1J6J49, Iooooty 2J, 2006).
6. 1he enabllng lnsLrumenL for Lhe exerclse of emlnenL domaln ls an ordlnance, noL a resoluLlon (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
6.1 A resoluLlon whlch merely expresses Lhe senLlmenL of Lhe munlclpal councll wlll noL sufflce (8eloso vs. Moolclpollty of loooy, C.k. No. 15J974, Aoqost 07, 2006, lotooopoe vs. vM keolty cotpototloo, C.k. No. 127820 Ioly 20, 1998).
6.2 ln a resoluLlon, Lhere ls no poslLlve acL of lnsLlLuLlng Lhe lnLended exproprlaLlon proceedlngs (Aotoolo vs. Cetoolmo, C.k. No. 124779, Novembet 29, 2005).
6.3 1he enacLmenL of Lhe ordlnance musL precede Lhe flllng of Lhe exproprlaLlon complalnL (5oqoltoo vs. MooJoloyooq clty, C.k. No. 1J5087, Motcb 14, 2000).
7. 1here musL be a valld and deflnlLe offer (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
7.1 8easonable efforLs musL be exhausLed ln acqulrlng Lhe properLy volunLarlly (Iesos ls lotJ cbtlstloo 5cbool loooJotloo vs. loslq, C.k. No. 1522J0, Aoqost 09, 2005). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 36
7.2 An LCu has Lhe burden of provlng compllance wlLh Lhe mandaLory requlremenL of a valld and deflnlLe offer Lo Lhe owner of Lhe properLy before flllng lLs complalnL and Lhe re[ecLlon Lhereof by Lhe laLLer.
lL ls lncumbenL upon Lhe condemnor Lo exhausL all reasonable efforLs Lo obLaln Lhe land lL deslres by agreemenL.
lallure Lo prove compllance wlLh Lhe mandaLory requlremenL wlll resulL ln Lhe dlsmlssal of Lhe complalnL (Iesos ls lotJ cbtlstloo 5cbool loooJotloo vs. loslq, C.k. No. 1522J0, Aoqost 09, 2005).
7.3 1he offer musL be compleLe, lndlcaLlng wlLh sufflclenL clearness Lhe klnd of conLracL lnLended and deflnlLely sLaLlng Lhe essenLlal condlLlons of Lhe proposed conLracL.
An offer would requlre, among oLher Lhlngs, a clear cerLalnLy on boLh Lhe ob[ecL and Lhe cause or conslderaLlon of Lhe envlsloned conLracL. 1here ls no valld offer when Lhe leLLer senL by Lhe LCu Lo Lhe owner ls a mere lnvlLaLlon Lo a conference Lo dlscuss Lhe pro[ecL and Lhe prlce (Iesos ls lotJ cbtlstloo 5cbool loooJotloo vs. loslq, C.k. No. 1522J0, Aoqost 09, 2005).
8. ln Lhe exerclse of Lhls power, Lhe ConsLlLuLlon and oLher perLlnenL laws musL be followed (5ectloo 19, 1991 lCc).
8.1 rlvaLe lands rank lasL ln Lhe order of prlorlLy for purposes of soclallzed houslng. LxproprlaLlon proceedlngs are Lo be resorLed Lo only afLer Lhe oLher modes of acqulslLlon have been exhausLed under 8epubllc AcL. no. 7279, Lhe urban uevelopmenL and Pouslng AcL of 1992 (stote of nelts of lote x-Iostlce Iose 8.l. keyes vs. Moollo, C.k. No. 1J24J1/ 1J7146, lebtooty 12, 2004, lllstteom lotetootloool vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 125218 / 128077, Iooooty 2J, 1998).
9. 1he auLhorlLy of Lhe supervlslng-hlgher LCu ln exerclslng lLs revlew auLhorlLy over ordlnances of supervlsed-lower LCu ls llmlLed Lo quesLlons of law/legal quesLlons, l.e., wheLher or noL Lhe ordlnances are wlLhln Lhe powers of supervlsed-lower LCu Lo enacL, wheLher or noL oltto vltes, and wheLher or noL procedures were followed. 1he power Lo revlew does noL exLend Lo cholce of properLy Lo be exproprlaLed (MoJoy vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 107916 lebtooty 20, 1997).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 37 10. 1he approval of Lhe ueparLmenL of Agrarlan 8eform (uA8) ls noL requlred before an LCu can exproprlaLe an agrlculLural land (ltovloce of comotloes 5ot vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 175604, 5eptembet 18, 2009).
11. !udlclal revlew of Lhe exerclse of emlnenL domaln ls llmlLed Lo Lhe followlng areas of concern: (1) Lhe adequacy of Lhe compensaLlon, (2) Lhe necesslLy of Lhe Laklng, and (3) Lhe publlc use characLer of Lhe purpose of Lhe Laklng (Moslklp vs. clty of loslq, C.k. No. 1J6J49, Iooooty 2J, 2006).
11.1 An exproprlaLlon sulL ls lncapable of pecunlary esLlmaLlon. Accordlngly, lL falls wlLhln Lhe [urlsdlcLlon of 8eglonal 1rlal CourLs, regardless of Lhe value of Lhe sub[ecL properLy. An exproprlaLlon sulL does noL lnvolve Lhe recovery of a sum of money buL lnvolves Lhe governmenL's auLhorlLy Lo exproprlaLe (8otJllloo vs. Moslll, C.k. No. 146886, Aptll J0, 200J).
11.2 1he requlslLes for auLhorlzlng lmmedlaLe enLry ln Lhe exerclse of an LCu's rlghL of emlnenL domaln are as follows: (1) Lhe flllng of a complalnL for exproprlaLlon sufflclenL ln form and subsLance, and (2) Lhe deposlL of Lhe amounL equlvalenL Lo 13 of Lhe falr markeL value of Lhe properLy Lo be exproprlaLed based on lLs currenL Lax declaraLlon. upon compllance wlLh Lhese requlremenLs, Lhe lssuance of a wrlL of possesslon becomes mlnlsLerlal (llollo clty vs. leqospl, C.k. No. 154614, Novembet 25, 2004).
a. lor a wrlL of possesslon Lo lssue, only Lwo requlremenLs are requlred: (1) Lhe sufflclency ln form and subsLance of Lhe complalnL, and (2) Lhe requlred provlslonal deposlL. no hearlng ls requlred for Lhe lssuance of a wrlL of possesslon. 1he sufflclency ln form and subsLance of Lhe complalnL for exproprlaLlon can be deLermlned by Lhe mere examlnaLlon of Lhe allegaLlons of Lhe complalnL (llollo clty vs. leqospl, C.k. No. 154614, Novembet 25, 2004).
b. 1he law does noL make Lhe deLermlnaLlon of a publlc purpose a condlLlon precedenL Lo Lhe lssuance of a wrlL of possesslon (ltooclo vs. Meycoooyoo, C.k. No. 1704J2, Motcb 24, 2008).
c. 1he requlred deposlL ls based on Lhe properLy's currenL Lax declaraLlon (koecbt, loc. vs. Moolclpollty of coloto, C.k. 145254, Ioly 17, 2006).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 38 11.3 1he owner of Lhe exproprlaLed properLy has cerLaln remedles.
a. 1he owner may flle a mandamus case agalnsL Lhe LCu ln order Lo compel lLs sooqqooloo Lo enacL anoLher approprlaLlon ordlnance replaclng a prevlous one whlch charged Lhe paymenL for [usL compensaLlon Lo a non-exlsLenL bank accounL (Otteqo vs. clty of cebo, C.k. No. 181562-6J, Octobet 2, 2009).
b. Where a munlclpallLy falls or refuses, wlLhouL [usLlflable reason, Lo effecL paymenL of a flnal money [udgmenL rendered agalnsL lL, Lhe clalmanL may avall of Lhe remedy of mandamus ln order Lo compel Lhe enacLmenL and approval of Lhe necessary approprlaLlon ordlnance, and Lhe correspondlng dlsbursemenL of munlclpal funds Lherefore (Mokotl vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 898998-89, Octobet 01, 1990, ojolco vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 164282, Octobet 12, 2005).
c. 1he non-flllng of an exproprlaLlon case wlll noL necessarlly lead Lo Lhe reLurn of Lhe properLy Lo lLs owner. 8ecovery of possesslon can no longer be allowed where Lhe owner was gullLy of esLoppel and, more lmporLanLly, where whaL was consLrucLed on Lhe properLy was a publlc road. WhaL ls lefL Lo Lhe owner ls Lhe rlghL Lo [usL compensaLlon (oseblo vs. lols, C.k. No. 162474, Octobet 15, 2009).
D&+,"332)2+"#2(/ () *"/:
1. 8eclasslflcaLlon ls Lhe acL of speclfylng how agrlculLural lands shall be uLlllzed for non-agrlculLural (resldenLlal, lndusLrlal, commerclal) as embodled ln Lhe land use plan, sub[ecL Lo Lhe requlremenLs and procedure for land use converslon (5ectloo 20, 1991 lCc).
1.1 Converslon ls dlfferenL from reclasslflcaLlon. Converslon ls Lhe acL of changlng Lhe currenL use of a plece of agrlculLural land lnLo some oLher use as approved by Lhe ueparLmenL of Agrarlan 8eform (uA8). Accordlngly, a mere reclasslflcaLlon of agrlculLural land does noL auLomaLlcally allow a landowner Lo change lLs use and Lhus cause Lhe e[ecLmenL of Lhe LenanLs. Pe/she has Lo undergo Lhe process of converslon before he/she ls permlLLed Lo use Lhe agrlculLural land for oLher purposes (kos vs. uAk, C.k. No. 1J2477, Aoqost J1, 2005). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 39
mloeot uomolo 2ooloq keclosslflcotloo coovetsloo Compensable 1aklng ollce ower AdmlnlsLraLlve AdmlnlsLraLlve Change of Cwner (prlvaLe Lo LCu) no change of owner no change of owner no change of owner Any land Any land AgrlculLural Lo non- AgrlculLural AgrlculLural Lo non- AgrlculLural Change acLual use no change no change Change acLual use All LCus CrlglnaLes from ClLles/ MunlclpallLles, rovlnce lnLegraLes ClLles/ MunlclpallLles ueparLmenL of Agrarlan 8eform no hearlng mandaLed no hearlng mandaLed ubllc hearlng requlred no hearlng mandaLed
*(+", *&@23,"#2(/
1. Local leglslaLlve power ls Lhe power of LCus Lhrough Lhelr local leglslaLlve counclls Lo enacL, repeal, amend, modlfy ordlnances and lssue resoluLlons.
1.1 Local leglslaLlve power shall be exerclsed by Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo for Lhe provlnce, Lhe sooqqoolooq poolooqsoJ for Lhe clLy, Lhe sooqqoolooq boyoo for Lhe munlclpallLy, and Lhe sooqqoolooq botooqoy for Lhe barangay (5ectloo 48, 1991 lCc).
2. Local leglslaLlon ls referred Lo as subordlnaLlon leglslaLlon.
2.1 Local pollLlcal subdlvlslons are able Lo leglslaLe only by vlrLue of a valld delegaLlon of leglslaLlve power from Lhe naLlonal leglslaLure excepL only LhaL Lhe power Lo creaLe Lhelr own sources of revenue and Lo levy Laxes ls conferred by Lhe ConsLlLuLlon lLself. 1hey are mere agenLs vesLed wlLh whaL ls called Lhe power of subordlnaLe leglslaLlon. As delegaLes of Congress, LCus cannoL conLravene buL musL obey aL all Llmes Lhe wlll of Lhelr prlnclpal. An enacLmenL local ln orlgln cannoL prevall agalnsL a decree, whlch has Lhe force and effecL of a sLaLuLe (Moollo vs. loqolo, C.k. No. 118127, Aptll 12, 2005).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 40 2.2 An ordlnance ln confllcL wlLh a sLaLe law of general characLer and sLaLewlde appllcaLlon ls unlversally held Lo be lnvalld. 1he prlnclple ls frequenLly expressed ln Lhe declaraLlon LhaL munlclpal auLhorlLles, under a general granL of power, cannoL adopL ordlnances whlch lnfrlnge upon Lhe splrlL of a sLaLe law or repugnanL Lo Lhe general pollcy of Lhe sLaLe. ln every power Lo pass ordlnances glven Lo a munlclpallLy, Lhere ls an lmplled resLrlcLlon LhaL Lhe ordlnances shall be conslsLenL wlLh Lhe general law (8otooqos cA1v vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 1J8810, Octobet 20, 2004).
2.3 1he delegaLe cannoL be superlor Lo Lhe prlnclpal or exerclse powers hlgher Lhan Lhose of Lhe laLLer (loqcoo vs. lobto, C.k. No. 155746, Octobet 1J, 2004).
2.4 A ptovlso ln an ordlnance dlrecLlng LhaL Lhe real properLy Lax be based on Lhe acLual amounL reflecLed ln Lhe deed of conveyance or Lhe prevalllng 8ureau of lnLernal 8evenue zonal value ls lnvalld noL only because lL mandaLes an excluslve rule ln deLermlnlng Lhe falr markeL value buL more so because lL deparLs from Lhe esLabllshed procedures sLaLed ln Lhe Local AssessmenL 8egulaLlons no. 1-92 (AllleJ 8ookloq vs. Ooezoo clty, C.k. No. 154126, Octobet 11, 2005).
3. Local leglslaLlve acLs are referred Lo as denomlnaLed ordlnances. lor an ordlnance Lo be valld, lL musL noL only be wlLhln Lhe corporaLe powers of Lhe LCu Lo enacL and musL be passed accordlng Lo Lhe procedure prescrlbed by law, lL musL also conform Lo Lhe followlng subsLanLlve requlremenLs: (1) musL noL conLravene Lhe ConsLlLuLlon or any sLaLuLe, (2) musL noL be unfalr or oppresslve, (3) musL noL be parLlal or dlscrlmlnaLory, (4) musL noL prohlblL buL may regulaLe Lrade, (3) musL be general and conslsLenL wlLh publlc pollcy, and (6) musL noL be unreasonable (loqcoo vs. lobto, C.k. No. 155746, Octobet 1J, 2004).
4. Crdlnances enacLed by LCus en[oy Lhe presumpLlon of consLlLuLlonallLy. 1o overLhrow Lhls presumpLlon, Lhere musL be a clear and unequlvocal breach of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon, noL merely a doubLful or argumenLaLlve conLradlcLlon. ln shorL, Lhe confllcL wlLh Lhe ConsLlLuLlon musL be shown beyond reasonable doubL. When doubL exlsLs, even lf well-founded, Lhere can be no flndlng of unconsLlLuLlonallLy (1ooo vs. 5octotes, C.k. No. 110249, Aoqost 21, 1997).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 41 3. A vold leglslaLlve acL such an ordlnance granLlng a franchlse Lo cable Lelevlslon operaLors, a power vesLed on Lhe naLlonal 1elecommunlcaLlons Commlsslon, does noL confer any rlghL nor vesL any prlvllege (2oomzot vs. leople of tbe lblllpploes, C.k. No. 1J55J5, lebtooty 14, 2005).
6. Crdlnances passed ln Lhe exerclse of Lhe general welfare clause and devolved powers of LCus need noL be approved by Lhe devolvlng agency ln order Lo be effecLlve absenL a speclflc provlslon of law (1ooo vs. 5octotes, C.k. No. 110249, Aoqost 21, 1997).
7. 1here are no unlawful dlsbursemenLs of publlc funds when dlsbursemenLs are made pursuanL Lo a re-enacLed budgeL. Money can be pald ouL of Lhe local Lreasury slnce Lhere ls a valld approprlaLlon (vllloooevo vs. Ople, C.k. No. 165125, Octobet 18, 2005).
8. Local leglslaLlve counclls enacL ordlnances and lssue resoluLlons.
8.1 LeglslaLlve acLlons of a general and permanenL characLer shall be enacLed ln Lhe form of ordlnances, whlle Lhose whlch are of Lemporary characLer shall be passed ln Lhe form of resoluLlons. MaLLers relaLlng Lo proprleLary funcLlons and Lo prlvaLe concerns shall also be acLed upon by resoluLlon (Att. 107, lmplemeotloq koles ooJ keqolotloos of tbe 1991 lCc)
OtJloooces kesolotloos LqulvalenL Lo Law Lxpresslon of SenLlmenL or Cplnlon ubllc or CovernmenLal rlvaLe or roprleLary More or Less ermanenL 1emporary As a general rule, musL undergo 3 readlngs As a general rule, only undergoes 2 readlngs All ordlnances sub[ecL Lo veLo/ 8evlew Cnly some resoluLlons sub[ecL Lo veLo/ 8evlew (l.e., local developmenL plan and publlc lnvesLmenL program)
9. LCus can enLer lnLo conLracLs sub[ecL Lo cerLaln requlremenLs (5ectloo 22jo]j5], 1991 lCc).
9.1 unless oLherwlse provlded ln Lhe 1991 LCC, no conLracL may be enLered lnLo by Lhe local chlef execuLlve ln behalf of Lhe LCu wlLhouL prlor drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 42 auLhorlzaLlon by Lhe sooqqooloo concerned. A leglble copy of such conLracL shall be posLed aL a consplcuous place ln Lhe provlnclal caplLol or Lhe clLy, munlclpal or barangay hall (5ectloo 22jc], 1991 lCc).
9.2 A mayor valldly enLered lnLo a ConLracL of Legal Servlces where Lhe sooqqooloo unanlmously passed a resoluLlon auLhorlzlng hls/her Lo hlre a lawyer of hls/her cholce Lo represenL Lhe munlclpallLy's lnLeresL (Moolclpollty of 1lwl vs. 8etlto, C.k. No. 17187J, Ioly 9, 2010).
9.3 1he prlor auLhorlzaLlon may be ln Lhe form of an approprlaLlon ordlnance passed for Lhe year whlch speclflcally covers Lhe pro[ecL, cosL or conLracL Lo be enLered lnLo by Lhe LCu (Oolsombloq vs. Cotclo, C.k. No. 175527, uecembet 8, 2008).
9.4 A loan agreemenL enLered lnLo by Lhe provlnclal governor wlLhouL prlor auLhorlzaLlon from Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo ls unenforceable. 1he sooqqooloos fallure Lo lmpugn Lhe conLracL's valldlLy desplLe knowledge of lLs lnflrmlLy ls an lmplled raLlflcaLlon LhaL valldaLes Lhe conLracL (Ocompo vs. leople, C.k. Nos. 156547-51 / 156J82-85, lebtooty 4, 2008).
9.3 1he auLhorlLy of Lhe unong 8arangay Lo accepL a donaLlon on behalf of Lhe barangay ls deemed raLlfled when Lhrough Lhe years, Lhe sooqqooloo botooqoy dld noL repudlaLe Lhe accepLance of Lhe donaLlon and when Lhe barangay and Lhe people of Lhe barangay have conLlnuously en[oyed Lhe maLerlal and publlc servlce beneflLs arlslng from Lhe lnfrasLrucLures pro[ecLs puL up on Lhe sub[ecL properLy (uolot vs. 8otooqoy loblob, C.k. No. 15266J, Novembet 18, 2005).
9.6 A local chlef execuLlve has Lhe auLhorlLy Lo flle sulLs for Lhe recovery of funds and properLy on behalf of Lhe LCu, even wlLhouL Lhe prlor auLhorlzaLlon from Lhe sooqqooloo. nowhere ln Lhe enumeraLed powers and duLles of Lhe sooqqooloo
can one flnd Lhe requlremenL of such prlor auLhorlzaLlon ln favor of Lhe local chlef execuLlve for Lhe purpose of flllng sulLs on behalf of Lhe LCu (clty of coloocoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 145004, Moy 0J, 2006).
10. 1he local leglslaLlve process has Lhe followlng sLages/sLeps: (1) sponsorshlp, (2) 1 sL
readlng, (3) commlLLee dellberaLlons, (4) commlLLee reporL, (3) 2 nd readlng (lnLerpellaLlon and amendmenLs), (6) 3 rd readlngs, aLLesLaLlon, (7) LransmlLLal Lo drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 43 local chlef execuLlve, (8) approval or veLo, (9) publlcaLlon/ posLlng, (10) effecLlvlLy, and (11) revlew by Lhe supervlslng-hlgher sooqqooloo.
11. A sooqqooloo ls a colleglal body.
11.1. LeglslaLlon requlres Lhe parLlclpaLlon of all lLs members so LhaL Lhey may noL only represenL Lhe lnLeresLs of Lhelr respecLlve consLlLuenLs buL also help ln Lhe maklng of declslons by voLlng upon every quesLlon puL upon Lhe body (2omoto vs. cobolleto, C.k. No. 147767, Iooooty 14, 2004).
11.2 1he acLs of only a parL of Lhe sanggunlan done ouLslde Lhe parameLers of Lhe legal provlslons are legally lnflrm. All such acLs cannoL be glven blndlng force and effecL for Lhey are consldered unofflclal acLs done durlng an unauLhorlzed sesslon (2omoto vs. cobolleto, C.k. No. 147767, Iooooty 14, 2004).
11.3 A ma[orlLy of all members of Lhe sooqqooloo who have been elecLed and quallfled shall consLlLuLe a quorum Lo LransacL offlclal buslness. 1he deLermlnaLlon of Lhe exlsLence of a quorum ls based on Lhe LoLal number of members of Lhe sooqqooloo wlLhouL regard Lo Lhe flllng of a leave of absence (2omoto vs. cobolleto, C.k. No. 147767, Iooooty 14, 2004).
11.4 A sooqqooloo may provlde for a voLe requlremenL dlfferenL from LhaL prescrlbed under Lhe law (l.e., generally, ma[orlLy voLe) for cerLaln (buL noL all) ordlnances as ln amendlng a zonlng ordlnance. (cosloo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 91192, uecembet 2, 1991).
11.3 1he sooqqooloos verbal concurrence ls noL Lhe concurrence envlsloned under Lhe law. 1he sooqqooloo, as a leglslaLlve body, acLs Lhrough a resoluLlon or an ordlnance, adopLed ln a leglslaLlve sesslon (Mootoetto vs. 1y, C.k. No. 1777J6, Octobet 6, 2008).
11.6 1here ls noLhlng ln Lhe language of Lhe law LhaL resLrlcLs Lhe maLLers Lo be Laken up durlng Lhe flrsL regular sesslon merely Lo Lhe adopLlon or updaLlng of Lhe house rules. A supplemenLal budgeL may be passed on Lhe flrsL sesslon day of Lhe sanggunlan (Moloozo vs. 2omoto, C.k. No. 1J7718, Ioly 27, 1999).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 44 11.7 1here ls noLhlng ln Lhe law whlch prohlblLs Lhe conducL of Lhree readlngs of a proposed ordlnance from belng held ln [usL one sesslon day (Moloozo vs. 2omoto, C.k. No. 1J7718, Ioly 27, 1999).
11.8 AbsenL a law, local leglslaLlve counclls have no conLempL and subpoena powers (Neqtos Otleotol ll lecttlc coopetotlve loc. vs. 5ooqqoolooq loolooqsoJ of uomoqoete, C.k. No. 72492, Novembet 05, 1987).
12. Covernors and mayors have Lhe power Lo approve or veLo ordlnances. 1he local chlef execuLlve may veLo any ordlnance of Lhe sooqqooloo poololowlqoo, sooqqoolooq poolooqsoJ, or sooqqooloo boyoo on Lhe ground LhaL lL ls oltto vltes or pre[udlclal Lo Lhe publlc welfare, sLaLlng hls reasons Lherefor ln wrlLlng (5ectloo 55jo], 1991 lCc).
12.1 1he governor or mayor has Lhe power Lo veLo Lhe enLlre ordlnance or parLlcular lLems Lhereof. 1he local chlef execuLlve, excepL Lhe punong barangay, shall have Lhe power Lo veLo any parLlcular lLem or lLems of an approprlaLlons ordlnance, an ordlnance or resoluLlon adopLlng a local developmenL plan and publlc lnvesLmenL program, or an ordlnance dlrecLlng Lhe paymenL of money or creaLlng llablllLy (5ectloo 55jb], 1991 lCc).
12.2 1he local chlef execuLlve may veLo an ordlnance or resoluLlon only once. 1he sooqqooloo may overrlde Lhe veLo of Lhe local chlef execuLlve concerned by Lwo-Lhlrds (2/3) voLe of all lLs members, Lhereby maklng Lhe ordlnance effecLlve even wlLhouL Lhe approval of Lhe local chlef execuLlve concerned (5ectloo 55jc], 1991 lCc).
12.3 1he granL of Lhe veLo power confers auLhorlLy beyond Lhe slmple acL of slgnlng an ordlnance or resoluLlon as a requlslLe Lo lLs enforceablllLy. Such power accords Lhe local chlef execuLlve Lhe dlscreLlon Lo susLaln a resoluLlon or ordlnance ln Lhe flrsL lnsLance or Lo veLo lL and reLurn lL wlLh hls/her ob[ecLlons Lo Lhe sooqqooloo (uelos keyes vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 121215, Novembet 1J, 1997).
12.4 An approprlaLlon ordlnance slgned by Lhe local chlef execuLlve auLhorlzes Lhe release of publlc funds. 1he mayor's slgnaLure approvlng Lhe budgeL ordlnance was hls/her assenL Lo Lhe approprlaLlon of funds. lf he/she dld drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 43 noL agree wlLh such allocaLlon, he/she could have veLoed Lhe lLem (coloocoo clty vs. AllotJe, C.k. No. 107271, 5eptembet 10, 200J).
12.3 A munlclpal mayor cannoL lssue a mayor's permlL Lo operaLe a cockplL wlLhouL an enabllng ordlnance. A general ordlnance empowerlng a mayor Lo lssue permlLs cannoL be used Lo [usLlfy Lhe lssuance of a llcense. A mayor cannoL also be compelled Lo lssue such a llcense slnce Lhls would consLlLuLe an undue encroachmenL on Lhe mayor's admlnlsLraLlve prerogaLlves (cooet vs. ueceoo, C.k. No. 155J44, Octobet 20, 2004).
13. 8evlew ls a reconslderaLlon or re-examlnaLlon for purposes of correcLlon. 1he power of revlew ls exerclsed Lo deLermlne wheLher lL ls necessary Lo correcL Lhe acLs of Lhe subordlnaLe and Lo see Lo lL LhaL supervlsed unlL performs Lhe duLles ln accordance wlLh law (cosloo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 91192, uecembet 2, 1991).
14. An LCu has Lwo branches of governmenL, l.e. execuLlve and leglslaLlve. 1he Covernor for Lhe rovlnces, Mayors for ClLles and MunlclpallLles, and Lhe unong 8arangay for 8arangays are Lhe local chlef execuLlves, whlle Lhe vlce-Covernor and vlce-Mayor are Lhe vlce-local chlef execuLlves. 1he 1991 LCC does noL provlde for Lhe poslLlon of vlce-unong 8arangay.
locol cblef xecotlve vlce-locol cblef xecotlve LxecuLlve LeglslaLlve and LxecuLlve (as vlce) veLo or Approve reslde over sesslons AppolnL Lmployees of Lhe LxecuLlve 8ranch and LeglslaLlve 8ranch funded by LxecuLlve 8ranch AppolnL Lmployees of 5ooqqooloo and Cfflce of vlce-Mayor funded from 5ooqqooloo and CvLCL Approves ulsbursemenLs and vouchers for LxecuLlve 8ranch Approves ulsbursemenLs and vouchers for LeglslaLlve 8ranch ApproprlaLlons: May veLo, lf approved, musL release funds LnacL ApproprlaLlons Crdlnance
veto kevlew Approve or dlsapprove 8econslderaLlon or re-examlnaLlon for purposes of correcLlon lnLra-LCu (wlLhln Lhe LCu) lnLer-LCu (2 LCus) LxecuLlve ower LeglslaLlve ower Local Chlef LxecuLlve Supervlslng-Plgher Sanggunlan drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 46 veto kevlew ultto vltes (beyond Lhe powers of Lhe LCu) or re[udlclal Lo ubllc Welfare of law and facL/ wlsdom ultto vltes lnvolves quesLlon of law and facL/wlsdom lnvolves quesLlon of law only erlod Lo exerclse: rovlnce (13 days), ClLy/ MunlclpallLy (10 days) 30 days no veLo ln 8arangays no 8evlew of rovlnclal Crdlnances 8eversal by Cverrlde or !udlclal 8evlew (reversal by courLs) !udlclal 8evlew (reversal only by courLs)
13. 1he 1991 LCC allows for revlew of cerLaln ordlnances.
13.1 1he law requlres LhaL a dlssaLlsfled Laxpayer who quesLlons Lhe valldlLy or legallLy of a Lax ordlnance musL flle lLs appeal Lo Lhe SecreLary of !usLlce wlLhln 30 days from effecLlvlLy Lhereof. ln case Lhe SecreLary decldes Lhe appeal, a perlod of 30 days ls allowed for an aggrleved parLy Lo go Lo courL. 8uL lf Lhe SecreLary does noL acL Lhereon, afLer Lhe lapse of 60 days, a parLy could already proceed Lo seek rellef ln courL (keyes et. ol. vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 1182JJ, uecembet 10, 1999, 5ectloo 187, 1991 lCc).
a. lallure Lo appeal Lo Lhe SecreLary of !usLlce wlLhln 30 days from Lhe effecLlvlLy daLe of Lhe Lax ordlnance as mandaLed by SecLlon 187 of Lhe 1991 LCC ls faLal (IotJloe uovles vs. Allposo, C.k. No. 118900, lebtooty 27, 200J).
13.2 1he ueparLmenL of 8udgeL and ManagemenL shall revlew ordlnances auLhorlzlng Lhe annual or supplemenLal approprlaLlons of provlnces, hlghly-urbanlzed clLles, lndependenL componenL clLles, and munlclpallLles wlLhln Lhe MeLropollLan Manlla Area (5ectloo J26, 1991 lCc).
13.3 Crdlnances bannlng Lhe caLchlng of cerLaln specles of flshes and corals need noL be approved by Lhe ueparLmenL of LnvlronmenL and naLural 8esources before Lhey can be effecLlve because ln Lhe exerclse of devolved power, such approval ls noL necessary (1ooo vs. 5octotes, C.k. No. 110249, Aoqost 21, 1997).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 47 13.4 1he Cfflce of Lhe resldenL, ueparLmenL of lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL, and oLher execuLlve deparLmenLs are noL glven Lhe power Lo revlew under Lhe 1991 LCC.
16. 1he consLlLuLlonallLy and legallLy of ordlnances and resoluLlons may be ralsed before Lhe courLs on [udlclal revlew.
16.1 A peLlLlon for cerLlorarl flled agalnsL a sooqqooloo Lhe legallLy of an ordlnance wlll noL lle slnce Lhe sooqqooloo does noL fall wlLhln Lhe amblL of Lrlbunal, board, or offlcer exerclslng [udlclal or quasl-[udlclal funcLlons. 1he enacLmenL of an ordlnance was done ln Lhe exerclse of leglslaLlve and execuLlve funcLlons of Lhe sooqqooloo and mayor respecLlvely and do noL parLake of [udlclal or quasl-[udlclal funcLlons (llqo oq mqo 8otooqoy Notloool vs. Moollo, C.k. No. 154599, Iooooty 21, 2004).
16.2 1he approprlaLe remedy ls a peLlLlon for declaraLory rellef. 1he requlslLes of an acLlon for declaraLory rellef are: (1) Lhe sub[ecL maLLer of Lhe conLroversy musL be a deed, wlll, conLracL or oLher wrlLLen lnsLrumenL, sLaLuLe, execuLlve order or regulaLlon, or ordlnance, (2) Lhe Lerms of sald documenLs and Lhe valldlLy Lhereof are doubLful and requlre [udlclal consLrucLlon, (3) Lhere musL have been no breach of Lhe documenLs ln quesLlon, (4) Lhere musL be an acLual [usLlclable conLroversy or Lhe rlpenlng seeds" of one beLween persons whose lnLeresLs are adverse, (3) Lhe lssue musL be rlpe for [udlclal deLermlnaLlon, and (6) adequaLe rellef ls noL avallable Lhrough oLher means or oLher forms of acLlon or proceedlng. 1hus, an acLlon for declaraLory rellef quesLlonlng Lwo resoluLlons and an ordlnance by a sooqqooloo poolooqsoJ ls premaLure where sald lssuances merely endorsed favorably Lo Lhe Pouslng Land use and 8egulaLory 8oard (PLu88) an appllcaLlon Lo develop a memorlal park. 1he sooqqooloo has noL yeL acLed on Lhe appllcaLlon wlLh flnallLy. 1he PLu88, belng Lhe sole regulaLory body for houslng and land developmenL, has Lhe flnal say on Lhe maLLer. under Lhe docLrlne of prlmary admlnlsLraLlve [urlsdlcLlon, courLs cannoL or wlll noL deLermlne a conLroversy where Lhe lssues for resoluLlon demand Lhe exerclse of sound admlnlsLraLlve dlscreLlon, requlrlng Lhe speclal knowledge, experlence, and servlces of Lhe admlnlsLraLlve Lrlbunal Lo deLermlne Lechnlcal and lnLrlcaLe maLLers of facL (lettet, It. vs. koco, It., C.k. No. 174129, Ioly 5, 2010).
While the enactment of an ordinance is NOT a quasi- j function, they have OTHER powers which ARE. drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 48 16.3 1he Supreme CourL can only revlew, revlse, reverse, modlfy on appeal or cerLlorarl flnal [udgmenLs and orders of lower courLs ln all cases ln whlch Lhe consLlLuLlonallLy or valldlLy of, among oLher Lhlngs, an ordlnance ls ln quesLlon (Otteqo vs. Ooezoo clty, C.k. No. 161400, 5eptembet 02, 2005).
16.4 lL ls a general rule LhaL Lhe regularlLy of Lhe enacLmenL of an offlclally promulgaLed sLaLuLe or ordlnance may noL be lmpeached by parol evldence or oral LesLlmony elLher of lndlvldual offlcers and members, or of sLrangers who may be lnLeresLed ln nulllfylng leglslaLlve acLlon (keyes et. ol. vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 1182JJ, uecembet 10, 1999).
E#F&% -(.&%/0&/#", "/: 7(%6(%"#& B(C&%3
1. 1he corporaLe powers of LCus are enumeraLed ln Lhe 1991 LCC buL Lhe llsLlng ls noL excluslve.
1.1 Lvery LCu, as a corporaLlon, shall have Lhe followlng powers Lo: (1) have conLlnuous successlon ln lLs corporaLe name, (2) sue and be sued, (3) have and use a corporaLe seal, (4) acqulre and convey real or personal properLy, (3) enLer lnLo conLracLs, and (6) exerclse such oLher powers as are granLed Lo corporaLlons, sub[ecL Lo Lhe llmlLaLlons provlded ln Lhe 1991 LCC and oLher laws (5ectloo 22, 1991 lCc).
2. Aslde from express powers, LCus also have lmplled powers (l.e. Lhose powers lmplled from express powers and sLaLe pollcles).
2.1 Whlle Lhe law dld noL expressly vesL on LCus Lhe power Lo abollsh LhaL offlce, absenL, however, any conLrary provlslon, LhaL auLhorlLy should be deemed embraced by lmpllcaLlon from Lhe power Lo creaLe lL (Iovlet vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. l-49065, Iooe, 1, 1994).
2.2 LCus cannoL use publlc funds for Lhe wldenlng and lmprovemenL of prlvaLely-owned sldewalks. under Lhe law, no publlc money shall be approprlaLed or applled for prlvaLe purposes (Alboo vs. letoooJo, C.k. No. 148J57, Iooe J0, 2006).
2.3 An LCu musL comply wlLh Lhe legal condlLlons lmposed on a donaLlon (clty of Aoqeles vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 97882, Aoqost 28, 1996). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 49
?723 M5 )'*+) +F.'('-K +(N )'*+) C'F!*"C 'D DF(NC
?($%+&3 () 9$/:3
1. LCus have consLlLuLlonal and sLaLuLory sources of funds.
1.1 under Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon, Lhe sources of funds of local governmenLs are Lhelr share ln naLlonal Laxes, share ln Lhe proceeds of Lhe uLlllzaLlon and developmenL naLlonal wealLh, local Laxes, fees and charges, oLher sources of revenues (5ectloos 5,6 ooJ 7, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
1.2 under Lhe 1991 LCus ralse funds from loans (5ectloos J00 ooJ J01, 1991 lCc), donaLlons and granLs (5ectloo 2J, 1991 lCc), floaL bonds (5ectloo 299, 1991 lCc), exerclse of proprleLary funcLlons (5ctloo 22jJ]. 1991 lCc), and credlL-flnanclng schemes such as 8ulld-CperaLe-1ransfer schemes (k.A. No. 7718 omeoJloq k.A. No. 6957).
923+", ;$#(/(05
1. Local auLonomy lncludes boLh admlnlsLraLlve and flscal auLonomy (ltovloce of 8otooqos vs. komolo, C.k. No. 152774, Moy 27, 2004, llmeotel vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1J2988, Ioly 19, 2000).
1.1 LCus en[oy flscal auLonomy. 1he consLlLuLlonal basls of flscal auLonomy ls SecLlon 3, ArLlcle x of Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon (llmeotel vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1J2988, Ioly 19, 2000).
1.2 llscal auLonomy means LhaL LCus have Lhe: (1) power Lo creaLe Lhelr own sources of revenue ln addlLlon Lo Lhelr equlLable share ln Lhe naLlonal Laxes released by Lhe naLlonal governmenL, as well as Lhe (2) power Lo allocaLe Lhelr resources ln accordance wlLh Lhelr own prlorlLles. (3) lL exLends Lo Lhe preparaLlon of Lhelr budgeLs, and local offlclals ln Lurn- have Lo work wlLhln Lhe consLralnLs Lhereof (llmeotel vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1J2988, Ioly 19, 2000).
Section 5. Each local government unit shall have the power to create its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, fees and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall accrue exclusively to the local governments. drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 30 1.3 Local flscal auLonomy does noL however rule ouL any manner of naLlonal governmenL lnLervenLlon by way of supervlslon, ln order Lo ensure LhaL local programs, flscal and oLherwlse, are conslsLenL wlLh naLlonal goals (llmeotel vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1J2988, Ioly 19, 2000).
2. As a consequence of flscal auLonomy:
2.1 1he ueparLmenL of 8udgeL and ManagemenL cannoL lmpose a llmlLaLlon noL found ln Lhe law such as seLLlng a cap on Lhe amounL of allowances for [udges (uoJole vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 125J50, uecembet 0J, 2002).
2.2 ln revlewlng Lax ordlnances, Lhe ueparLmenL of !usLlce can only declare a Lax measure unconsLlLuLlonal and lllegal. 1he SecreLary cannoL amend, modlfy or repeal Lhe Lax measure or declare lL excesslve, conflscaLory or conLrary Lo publlc welfare (utlloo vs. llm, C.k. No. 112497, Aoqost 4, 1994).
2.3 1he resLrlcLlve and llmlLed naLure of Lhe Lax exempLlon prlvlleges under Lhe 1991 LCC ls conslsLenL wlLh Lhe SLaLe pollcy of local auLonomy. 1he obvlous lnLenLlon of Lhe law ls Lo broaden Lhe Lax base of LCus Lo assure Lhem of subsLanLlal sources of revenue (lblllpploe kotol lecttlc coopetotlves Assoclotloo vs. ullC, C.k No. 14J076, Iooe 10, 200J).
2.4 WlLh Lhe added burden of devoluLlon, lL ls even more lmperaLlve for governmenL enLlLles Lo share ln Lhe requlremenLs of local developmenL, flscal or oLherwlse, by paylng Laxes or oLher charges due from Lhem (Notloool lowet cotpototloo vs. coboootooo clty, C.k. No. 149110, Aptll 09, 200J).
2.3 ln lnLerpreLlng sLaLuLory provlslons on munlclpal flscal powers, doubLs wlll have Lo be resolved ln favor of LCus (5oo loblo clty vs. keyes, C.k. No. 127708, Motcb 25, 1999).
A/#&%/", D&.&/$& ;,,(#0&/#
1. LCus shall have a [usL share, as deLermlned by law, ln Lhe naLlonal Laxes whlch shall be auLomaLlcally released Lo Lhem (5ectloo 6, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo). National government can exercise the power of supervision drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 31
1.2 AL presenL, all LCus have a 40 share ln Lhe naLlonal lnLernal revenue Laxes based on Lhe collecLlon of Lhe Lhlrd flscal year precedlng Lhe currenL flscal year (5ectloo 284, 1991 lCc).
1.3 Cf Lhe 40, provlnces and clLles are enLlLled Lo 23 each, munlclpallLles, 34, and barangays, 20. 1he share of a parLlcular local governmenL shall be based on Lhls formula: populaLlon, 30, land area, 23, and equal sharlng, 23 (5ectloo 285, 1991 lCc).
1.4 ln Lhe evenL LhaL Lhe naLlonal governmenL lncurs an unmanageable publlc secLor deflclL, Lhe resldenL of Lhe hlllpplnes ls hereby auLhorlzed, upon Lhe recommendaLlon of SecreLary of llnance, SecreLary of lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL and SecreLary of 8udgeL and ManagemenL, and sub[ecL Lo consulLaLlon wlLh Lhe presldlng offlcers of boLh Pouses of Congress and Lhe presldenLs of Lhe llga", Lo make Lhe necessary ad[usLmenLs ln Lhe lnLernal revenue alloLmenL of local governmenL unlLs buL ln no case shall Lhe alloLmenL be less Lhan LhlrLy percenL (30) of Lhe collecLlon of naLlonal lnLernal revenue Laxes of Lhe Lhlrd flscal year precedlng Lhe currenL flscal year (5ectloo 284, 1991 lCc).
1.3 1he lnLernal 8evenue AlloLmenL (l8A) of LCus: (1) forms parL of Lhe lncome of local governmenL unlLs, (2) forms parL of Lhe gross accreLlon of Lhe funds of Lhe local governmenL unlLs, (3) regularly and auLomaLlcally accrues Lo Lhe local Lreasury wlLhouL need of furLher acLlon on Lhe parL of Lhe LCu, (4) ls a regular and recurrlng lLem of lncome, (3) accrues Lo Lhe general fund of Lhe LCus, (6) ls used Lo flnance local operaLlons sub[ecL Lo modes provlded by Lhe 1991 LCC and lLs lmplemenLlng rules, and (7) ls lncluded ln Lhe compuLaLlon of Lhe average annual lncome for purposes of converslon of LCus (Alvotez vs. Coloqooo, C.k. No. 118J0J, Iooooty J1, 1996).
1.6 1he share of each LCu shall be released, wlLhouL need of any furLher acLlon, dlrecLly Lo Lhe provlnclal, clLy, munlclpal or barangay Lreasurer, as Lhe case may be, on a quarLerly basls wlLhln flve (3) days afLer Lhe end of each quarLer, and whlch shall noL be sub[ecL Lo any llen or holdback LhaL may be lmposed by Lhe naLlonal governmenL for whaLever purpose (5ectloo 286, 1991 lCc).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 32 a. 1he resldenL cannoL wlLhhold 10 of Lhe l8A wlLhouL complylng wlLh Lhe requlremenLs under SecLlon 284 of Lhe 1991 LCC. 1hls would be vlolaLlve of local auLonomy and flscal auLonomy (llmeotel vs. Aqoltte, C.k. No. 1J2988, Ioly 19, 2000).
b. 1he Ceneral ApproprlaLlon AcL cannoL place a porLlon of Lhe l8A ln an unprogrammed lund only Lo be released when a condlLlon ls meL, l.e., Lhe orlglnal revenue LargeLs are reallzed (Altetootlve ceotet vs. 2omoto, C.k. No. 144256, Iooe 8, 2005).
c. 1he provlslons ln Lhe Ceneral ApproprlaLlon AcL creaLlng Lhe Local CovernmenL Speclal LquallzaLlon lund and auLhorlzlng Lhe non- release of Lhe full 40 Lo all LCus are lnapproprlaLe provlslons/rlders. lurLher, an approprlaLlons acL cannoL amend a subsLanLlve law, l.e., 1991 LCC (ltovloce of 8otooqos vs. komolo, C.k. No. 152774, Moy 27, 2004).
d. A no reporL, no release" pollcy may noL be valldly enforced agalnsL offlces vesLed wlLh flscal auLonomy. 1he auLomaLlc release provlslon found ln Lhe ConsLlLuLlon means LhaL LCus cannoL be requlred Lo perform any acL Lo recelve Lhe [usL share" accrulng Lo Lhem from Lhe naLlonal coffers (clvll 5etvlce commlssloo vs. uepottmeot of 8oJqet ooJ Moooqemeot, C.k. No. 158791, Ioly 22, 2005).
?F"%& 2/ !"#2(/", G&",#F B%(+&&:3
1. LCus shall be enLlLled Lo an equlLable share ln Lhe proceeds of Lhe uLlllzaLlon and developmenL of Lhe naLlonal wealLh wlLhln Lhelr respecLlve areas, ln Lhe manner provlded by law, lncludlng sharlng Lhe same wlLh Lhe lnhablLanLs by way of dlrecL beneflLs (5ectloo 7, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
1.1 LCus shall have a 40 share of gross collecLlon derlved by Lhe naLlonal governmenL from Lhe precedlng flscal year from mlnlng Laxes, royalLles, foresLry and flshery charges, and such oLher Laxes, fees, or charges, lncludlng relaLed surcharges, lnLeresLs, or flnes, and from lLs share ln any co-producLlon, [olnL venLure or producLlon sharlng agreemenL ln Lhe uLlllzaLlon and developmenL of Lhe naLlonal wealLh wlLhln Lhelr LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlon (5ectloo 290, 1991 lCc). No condition on IRA drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 33
1.2 1he hosL provlnce shall be enLlLled Lo 20, componenL munlclpallLy/ clLy, 43 (lf hlghly-urbanlzed or lndependenL clLy, 63), and barangay, 33 (5ectloo 292, 1991 lCc).
B(C&% () 4">"#2(/
1. Lach LCu shall have Lhe power Lo levy Laxes, fees, and charges sub[ecL Lo such guldellnes and llmlLaLlons as Lhe Congress may provlde, conslsLenL wlLh Lhe baslc pollcy of local auLonomy. Such Laxes, fees, and charges shall accrue excluslvely Lo Lhe LCus (5ectloo 5, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo).
1.1 1he power Lo Lax ls prlmarlly vesLed ln Lhe Congress, however, ln our [urlsdlcLlon, lL may be exerclsed by local leglslaLlve bodles, no longer merely by vlrLue of a valld delegaLlon as before, buL pursuanL Lo dlrecL auLhorlLy conferred by SecLlon 3, ArLlcle x of Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon.
1he exerclse of Lhe power may be sub[ecL Lo such guldellnes and llmlLaLlons as Lhe Congress may provlde whlch, however, musL be conslsLenL wlLh Lhe baslc pollcy of local auLonomy (Moctoo cebo lotetootloool Altpott Aotbotlty vs. Motcos, C.k. No. 120082, 5eptembet 11, 1996)
1.2 1he llsL of Laxes under 8ook ll of Lhe 1991 LCC ls noL excluslve. LCus may exerclse Lhe power Lo levy Laxes, fees or charges on any base or sub[ecL: (1) noL oLherwlse speclflcally enumeraLed hereln or Laxed under Lhe provlslons of Lhe naLlonal lnLernal 8evenue Code, as amended, or oLher appllcable laws: rovlded, 1haL Lhe Laxes, fees, or charges shall: (2) noL be un[usL, excesslve, oppresslve, conflscaLory or conLrary Lo declared naLlonal pollcy: rovlded, furLher, 1haL Lhe: (3) ordlnance levylng such Laxes, fees or charges shall: (4) noL be enacLed wlLhouL any prlor publlc hearlng conducLed for Lhe purpose (5ectloo 186, 1991 lCc).
ltovloces cltles Moolclpolltles 8otooqoys 1ax on 1ransfer of 8eal roperLy Cwnershlp 1ax on 8uslness of rlnLlng and ubllcaLlon 1ax on 1ransfer of 8eal roperLy Cwnershlp 1ax on 8uslness of rlnLlng and ubllcaLlon 8uslness 1ax on ManufacLurers 8uslness 1ax on Wholesalers, ulsLrlbuLors, or uealers 1ax on SLores or 8eLallers wlLh flxed buslness esLabllshmenLs Power to tax: Not delegated to LGUs but direct authority by the Constitution Criteria for taxation drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 34 ltovloces cltles Moolclpolltles 8otooqoys lranchlse 1ax 1ax on Sand, Cravel and CLher Cuarry 8esources rofesslonal 1ax AmusemenL 1ax Annual llxed 1ax for Lvery uellvery 1ruck or van of ManufacLurers or roducers, Wholesalers of, uealers, or 8eLallers ln, CerLaln roducLs
8eal roperLy 1ax Speclal LducaLlon lund Levy Ad valorem 1ax on ldle Lands Speclal Levy on Land 8eneflLed by ubllc Works lranchlse 1ax 1ax on Sand, Cravel and CLher Cuarry 8esources rofesslonal 1ax AmusemenL 1ax Annual llxed 1ax for Lvery uellvery 1ruck or van of ManufacLurers or roducers, Wholesalers of, uealers, or 8eLallers ln, CerLaln roducLs 8uslness 1ax on ManufacLurers 8uslness 1ax on Wholesalers, ulsLrlbuLors, or uealers 8uslness 1ax on 8eLallers 8uslness 1ax on LxporLers, and on ManufacLurers, Wholesalers and 8eLallers of LssenLlal CommodlLles 8uslness 1ax on ConLracLors 8uslness 1ax on 8anks 8uslness 1ax on 8uslness 1ax on 8eLallers 8uslness 1ax on LxporLers, and on ManufacLurers, Wholesalers and 8eLallers of LssenLlal CommodlLles 8uslness 1ax on ConLracLors 8uslness 1ax on 8anks 8uslness 1ax on eddlers 8uslness 1ax on all oLher 8uslnesses
CommunlLy 1ax 8eal roperLy 1ax for MeLro-Manlla MunlclpallLles Speclal LducaLlon lund Levy Ad valorem 1ax on ldle Lands Speclal Levy on Land 8eneflLed by ubllc Works
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 33 ltovloces cltles Moolclpolltles 8otooqoys eddlers 8uslness 1ax on all oLher 8uslnesses
CommunlLy 1ax 8eal roperLy 1ax Speclal LducaLlon lund Levy Ad valorem 1ax on ldle Lands Speclal Levy on Land 8eneflLed by ubllc Works
?723 O5 )'*+) ,'#"!(-"(. 'DD$*$+)C
*&@23,"#2.& 7(/#%(, (.&% ?#%$+#$%&
1. 1he 1987 ConsLlLuLlon does noL enumeraLe Lhe local offlclals of Lhe flve klnds/levels of LCus.
2. Congress shall provlde for Lhe quallflcaLlons, elecLlon, appolnLmenL and removal, Lerm, salarles, and powers and funcLlons and duLles of local offlclals (5ectloo J, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo). Congress exerclses leglslaLlve conLrol over sLrucLure of LCus.
4&%0 () E))2+&
1. 1he Lerm of offlce of elecLlve local offlclals, excepL barangay offlclals, whlch shall be deLermlned by law, shall be Lhree years and no such offlclal shall serve for more Lhan Lhree consecuLlve Lerms. volunLary renunclaLlon of Lhe offlce for any lengLh of Llme shall noL be consldered as an lnLerrupLlon ln Lhe conLlnulLy of hls servlce for Lhe full Lerm for whlch he was elecLed (5ectloo 8, Attlcle \, 1987 coostltotloo). under 8.A. no. 9164, Lhe currenL Lerm of offlce of elecLlve barangay offlclals ls Lhree years. drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 36
1.1 lor Lhe 3-Lerm rule Lo apply, Lwo condlLlons musL concur: (1) Lhe offlclal concerned has been elecLed for Lhree consecuLlve Lerms ln Lhe same local governmenL posL, and (2) he/she has fully served Lhree consecuLlve Lerms. A munlclpal councllor who was elecLed for Lhree consecuLlve Lerms buL who had Lo assume Lhe poslLlon of vlce-mayor on hls/her second Lerm ln vlew of Lhe lncumbenL's reLlremenL ls noL deemed Lo have fully served Lhree consecuLlve Lerms (Mooteboo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 180444, Aptll 08, 2008).
1.2 Pe/she musL also have been elecLed Lo Lhe same poslLlon for Lhe same number of Llmes before Lhe dlsquallflcaLlon can apply. 1he flrsL requlslLe ls absenL when a proclamaLlon was subsequenLly declared vold slnce Lhere was no proclamaLlon aL all. Whlle a proclalmed candldaLe may assume offlce on Lhe sLrengLh of Lhe proclamaLlon of Lhe 8oard of Canvassers, he/she ls only a presumpLlve wlnner who assumes offlce sub[ecL Lo Lhe flnal ouLcome of Lhe elecLlon proLesL. 1he second requlslLe ls noL presenL when Lhe offlclal vacaLes Lhe offlce noL by volunLary renunclaLlon buL ln compllance wlLh Lhe legal process of wrlL of execuLlon lssued by Lhe Commlsslon on LlecLlons (loozoolJo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 1J5150, Ioly 28, 1999).
1.3 1he Lerm llmlL for elecLlve local offlclals musL be Laken Lo refer Lo Lhe rlghL Lo be elecLed as well as Lhe rlghL Lo serve ln Lhe same elecLlve poslLlon. ConsequenLly, lL ls noL enough LhaL an lndlvldual has served Lhree consecuLlve Lerms ln an elecLlve local offlce, he/she musL also have been elecLed Lo Lhe same poslLlon for Lhe same number of Llmes before Lhe dlsquallflcaLlon can apply. 1hus, Lhe Lerm of a vlce-mayor who became Lhe mayor by successlon ls noL consldered a Lerm as mayor for purposes of Lhe 3-Lerm rule (8otjo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 1JJ495, 5eptembet 0J, 1998).
1.4 revenLlve suspenslon, by lLs naLure, does noL lnvolve an effecLlve lnLerrupLlon of a Lerm and should Lherefore noL be a reason Lo avold Lhe 3-Lerm llmlLaLlon. 8ecause lL ls lmposed by operaLlon of law, prevenLlve suspenslon does noL lnvolve a volunLary renunclaLlon, lL merely lnvolves Lhe Lemporary lncapaclLy Lo perform Lhe servlce LhaL an elecLlve offlce demands (AlJovloo, It. vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 1848J6, uecembet 2J, 2009). 3 term rule: ELECTED Same post, served fully the 3 consecutive terms drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 37
1.3 A person who has run for Lhree consecuLlve Lerms may run ln a recall elecLlon so long as Lhe sald candldaLe ls noL runnlng for lmmedlaLe reelecLlon followlng hls/her Lhree consecuLlve Lerms. 1erm llmlLs should be consLrued sLrlcLly Lo glve Lhe fullesL posslble effecL Lo Lhe rlghL of Lhe elecLoraLe Lo choose Lhelr leaders. 1hus, Lhe 3-Lerm llmlL for local elecLed offlclals ls noL vlolaLed when a local offlclal wlns ln a recall elecLlon for mayor afLer servlng Lhree full Lerms as mayor slnce sald elecLlon ls noL consldered lmmedlaLe reelecLlon (5octotes vs. comelec, C.k. No. 154512, Novembet 12, 2002).
1.6 A person who served for Lwo consecuLlve Lerms for mayor and LhereafLer losL ln Lhe succeedlng elecLlons, can run ln Lhe nexL elecLlon slnce Lhe 3- Lerm rule was noL vlolaLed (AJotmeo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 147927, lebtooty 04, 2002).
1.7 A punong barangay servlng hls/her Lhlrd Lerm of offlce who ran, won and assumed offlce as sooqqooloo boyoo member ls deemed Lo have volunLarlly rellnqulshed hls/her offlce as punong barangay for purposes of Lhe Lhree-Lerm rule (8olos vs. comelec, C.k. No. 184082, Motcb 17, 2009).
1.8 A 3-Lerm mayor of a munlclpallLy converLed lnLo a clLy on Lhe 3 rd Lerm of Lhe mayor cannoL seek offlce as a clLy mayor ln Lhe 1 sL elecLlons of clLy offlclals conslderlng Lhe area and lnhablLanLs of Lhe locallLy are Lhe same and LhaL Lhe munlclpal mayor conLlnued Lo hold offlce unLll such Llme as clLy elecLlons are held. 1here was no lnvolunLary renunclaLlon on Lhe parL of Lhe munlclpal mayor aL any Llme durlng Lhe Lhree Lerms. Whlle Lhe clLy acqulred a new corporaLe exlsLence separaLe and dlsLlncL from LhaL of Lhe munlclpallLy, Lhls does noL mean LhaL for Lhe purpose of applylng Lhe consLlLuLlonal provlslon on Lerm llmlLaLlons, Lhe offlce of Lhe munlclpal mayor would be consLrued as dlfferenL from LhaL of Lhe offlce of Lhe clLy mayor (lotoso vs. comelec, C.k. No. 154829, uecembet 10, 200J).
1.9 A punong barangay who has served for Lhree consecuLlve Lerms when Lhe barangay was sLlll parL of a munlclpallLy ls dlsquallfled from runnlng for a 4 Lh consecuLlve Lerm when Lhe munlclpallLy was converLed Lo a clLy because Lhe poslLlon and LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlon are Lhe same (loceJo vs. lomeoo, C.k. No. 182867, Novembet 25, 2008). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 38
1.10 ln case of fallure of elecLlons lnvolvlng barangay offlclals, Lhe lncumbenL offlclals shall remaln ln offlce ln a hold-over capaclLy pursuanL Lo SecLlon 3 of 8epubllc AcL no. 9164 (AJop vs. comelec, C.k. No. 161984, lebtooty 21, 2007).
B(C&%3 () *(+", E))2+2",3
1. 1he powers of local governmenL offlclals are deflned under Lhe 1991 LCC.
2. 1he powers and responslblllLles of Lhe rovlnclal Covernor are enumeraLed under SecLlon 463 of Lhe 1991 LCC. Among oLhers, Lhe Covernor shall exerclse general supervlslon and conLrol over all programs, pro[ecLs, servlces, and acLlvlLles of Lhe provlnclal governmenL, enforce all laws and ordlnances relaLlve Lo Lhe governance of Lhe provlnce, represenL Lhe provlnce ln all lLs buslness LransacLlons and slgn ln lLs behalf all bonds, conLracLs, and obllgaLlons, and such oLher documenLs upon auLhorlLy of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo or pursuanL Lo law or ordlnance, ensure LhaL all execuLlve offlclals and employees of Lhe provlnce falLhfully dlscharge Lhelr duLles and funcLlons as provlded by law and Lhe 1991 LCC, ensure LhaL Lhe acLs of Lhe componenL clLles and munlclpallLles of Lhe provlnce and of lLs offlclals and employees are wlLhln Lhe scope of Lhelr prescrlbed powers, duLles and funcLlons, and ensure LhaL all Laxes and oLher revenues of Lhe provlnce are collecLed, and LhaL provlnclal funds are applled Lo Lhe paymenL of expenses and seLLlemenL of obllgaLlons of Lhe provlnce, ln accordance wlLh law or ordlnance.
3. 1he powers and responslblllLles of Lhe ClLy/Munlclpal Mayor are llsLed under SecLlons 433 and 444 of Lhe 1991 LCC, respecLlvely. Among oLhers, Lhe Mayor shall exerclse general supervlslon and conLrol over all programs, pro[ecLs, servlces, and acLlvlLles of Lhe munlclpal governmenL, enforce all laws and ordlnances relaLlve Lo Lhe governance of Lhe munlclpallLy, upon auLhorlzaLlon by Lhe sooqqoolooq pooqlooqsoJ/boyoo, represenL Lhe munlclpallLy ln all lLs buslness LransacLlons and slgn on lLs behalf all bonds, conLracLs, and obllgaLlons, and such oLher documenLs made pursuanL Lo law or ordlnance, ensure LhaL all execuLlve offlclals and employees of Lhe clLy/munlclpallLy falLhfully dlscharge Lhelr duLles and funcLlons, solemnlze marrlages, ensure LhaL Lhe acLs of Lhe clLy/munlclpallLy's componenL barangays and of lLs offlclals and employees are wlLhln Lhe scope of Lhelr prescrlbed powers, funcLlons, duLles and responslblllLles, lssue llcenses and permlLs and suspend or revoke Lhe same for any vlolaLlon of Lhe condlLlons upon whlch sald drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 39 llcenses or permlLs had been lssued, pursuanL Lo law or ordlnance, and ensure Lhe dellvery of baslc servlces and Lhe provlslon of adequaLe faclllLles.
4. 1he powers and responslblllLles of Lhe unong 8arangay are enumeraLed under SecLlon 389 of Lhe 1991 LCC. Among oLhers, Lhe unong 8arangay shall enforce of all laws and ordlnances whlch are appllcable wlLhln Lhe barangay, promoLe Lhe general welfare of Lhe barangay, negoLlaLe, enLer lnLo, and slgn conLracLs for and ln behalf of Lhe barangay, upon auLhorlzaLlon of Lhe sooqqoolooq botooqoy, malnLaln publlc order ln Lhe barangay, call and preslde over Lhe sesslons of Lhe sooqqoolooq botooqoy and Lhe barangay assembly, and voLe only Lo break a Lle, upon approval by a ma[orlLy of all Lhe members of Lhe sooqqoolooq botooqoy, appolnL or replace Lhe barangay Lreasurer, Lhe barangay secreLary, and oLher appolnLlve barangay offlclals, admlnlsLer Lhe operaLlon of Lhe kototooqooq pombotooqoy, and exerclse general supervlslon over Lhe acLlvlLles of Lhe sooqqoolooq kobotooo.
B(C&% #( ;66(2/#
1. 1he Local Chlef LxecuLlve and Lhe vlce-Local Chlef LxecuLlve have Lhe power Lo appolnL.
1.1 As a general rule, appolnLmenLs made by defeaLed local candldaLes afLer Lhe elecLlons are prohlblLed Lo avold anlmoslLles beLween ouLgolng and lncomlng offlclals, Lo allow Lhe lncomlng admlnlsLraLlon a free hand ln lmplemenLlng lLs pollcles, and Lo ensure LhaL appolnLmenLs and promoLlons are noL used as Lools for pollLlcal paLronage or as reward for servlces rendered Lo Lhe ouLgolng local offlclals. Powever, such appolnLmenLs may be allowed lf Lhe followlng requlslLes concur relaLlve Lo Lhelr lssuance: (1) 1he appolnLmenL has gone Lhrough Lhe regular screenlng by Lhe ersonnel SelecLlon 8oard (S8) before Lhe prohlblLed perlod on Lhe lssuance of appolnLmenLs as shown by Lhe S8 reporL or mlnuLes of lLs meeLlng, (2) 1he appolnLee ls quallfled, (3) 1here ls a need Lo flll up Lhe vacancy lmmedlaLely ln order noL Lo pre[udlce publlc servlce and/or endanger publlc safeLy, and (4) 1he appolnLmenL ls noL one of Lhose mass appolnLmenLs lssued afLer Lhe elecLlons (Nozoteoo vs. clty of uomoqoete, C.k. No. 168484, Ioly 12, 2007).
1.2 Where a munlclpal mayor orders Lhe suspenslon or dlsmlssal of a munlclpal employee on grounds he/she belleves Lo be proper, buL hls/her drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 60 order ls reversed or nulllfled by Lhe Clvll Servlce Commlsslon or Lhe CourL of Appeals, he/she has Lhe rlghL Lo conLesL such adverse rullng. Pls/her rlghL Lo appeal flows from Lhe facL LhaL hls/her power Lo appolnL carrles wlLh lL Lhe power Lo remove. 8elng chlef execuLlve of Lhe munlclpallLy, he/she possesses Lhls dlsclpllnary power over appolnLlve munlclpal offlclals and employees (uoqoJoq vs. 1ooqoowo, C.k. No. 161166-67, lebtooty 0J, 2005).
1.3 1he clLy legal offlcer has no dlsclpllnary auLhorlLy over Lhe chlef of Lhe Legal Affalrs and ComplalnL Servlces of Lhe ulvlslon of ClLy Schools. lnasmuch as Lhe sald offlclal was appolnLed by and ls a subordlnaLe of Lhe reglonal dlrecLor of Lhe ueparLmenL of LducaLlon, CulLure and SporLs, he/she ls sub[ecL Lo Lhe supervlslon and conLrol of sald dlrecLor (Aqoltte vs. ue costto, C.k. No. 1276J1, uecembet 17, 1999).
H"/ (/ I(,:2/@ <$", B(32#2(/3
1. no (local) elecLlve offlclal shall be ellglble for appolnLmenL or deslgnaLlon ln any capaclLy Lo any publlc offlce or poslLlon durlng hls/her Lenure (5ectloo 7jb], Attlcle l\j8], 1987 coostltotloo).
1.1 A clLy mayor cannoL be appolnLed Lo Lhe poslLlon of chalrperson of Lhe Sublc 8ay MeLropollLan AuLhorlLy slnce such offlce ls noL an ex-offlclo posL or aLLached Lo Lhe offlce of Lhe mayor. 1hls provlslon expresses Lhe pollcy agalnsL Lhe concenLraLlon of several publlc poslLlons ln one person, so LhaL a publlc offlcer or employee may serve full-Llme wlLh dedlcaLlon and Lhus be efflclenL ln Lhe dellvery of publlc servlces (llotes vs. utlloo, C.k. No. 1047J2, Iooe 22, 199J).
1.2 ursuanL Lo SecLlon 7(8), ArLlcle ll of Lhe Culdellnes ln Lhe ConducL of LlecLrlc CooperaLlve ulsLrlcL LlecLlons, ex-offlclo sooqqooloo members are dlsquallfled from becomlng board members of elecLrlc cooperaLlves (Notloool lecttlflcotloo AJmlolsttotloo vs. vllloooevo, C.k. No. 16820J, Motcb 9, 2010).
J"+"/+2&3
Serve FULL TIME with dedication and efciency drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 61 1. 1here are permanenL and Lemporary causes of vacancles ln local elecLlve poslLlons under Lhe 1991 LCC. 1he grounds are:
letmooeot 1empototy ueaLh volunLary reslgnaLlon ConvlcLlon LxplraLlon of Lerm ermanenL dlsablllLy lllls a hlgher vacanL offlce 8efuses Lo assume offlce lalls Lo quallfy 8emoved from offlce lallure of elecLlons Leave of absence 1ravel abroad Suspenslon from offlce revenLlve suspenslon Slckness 1emporary dlsablllLy
1.1 Where a permanenL vacancy occurs due Lo dlsquallflcaLlon ln Lhe offlce of mayor, Lhe proclalmed vlce-mayor shall succeed as mayor, pursuanL Lo SecLlon 44 of Lhe 1991 LCC (looJooJoyo vs. commlssloo oo lectloos, C.k. No. 179J1J, 5eptembet 17, 2009).
1.2 When a mayor ls ad[udged Lo be dlsquallfled, a permanenL vacancy was creaLed for fallure of Lhe elecLed mayor Lo quallfy for Lhe offlce. ln such evenLuallLy, Lhe duly elecLed vlce mayor shall succeed as provlded by law. 1he second placer cannoL be declared as mayor (1otol kote vs. comelec, C.k. Nos. 157526 / 157527, Aptll 28, 2004).
1.3 ln case Lhere ls a permanenL vacancy caused by a sooqqooloo member belonglng Lo a pollLlcal parLy, lL shall be Lhe resldenL acLlng Lhrough Lhe execuLlve secreLary who shall appolnL Lhe replacemenL, upon Lhe cerLlflcaLlon and nomlnaLlon of Lhe pollLlcal parLy from where Lhe replaced member comes from, for Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo and sooqqoolooq pooqlooqsoJ of a hlghly urbanlzed or lndependenL componenL clLy. lor Lhe sooqqoolooq pooqlooqsoJ of componenL clLles and lL shall be Lhe governor who shall make Lhe appolnLmenL upon Lhe cerLlflcaLlon and nomlnaLlon of Lhe pollLlcal parLy from where Lhe replaced member comes from. ln case Lhe vacancy ls caused by a member who does noL come from any pollLlcal parLy, appolnLmenL shall be done by Lhe offlclals menLloned upon Lhe recommendaLlon of Lhe sooqqooloo concerned, wlLhouL, however, need of Lhe nomlnaLlon or But wasn't there the contention that the Vice Mayor was not duly elected by the people?? If vacancy in the sanggunian: 1. President through ExSec appoint - panlalawigan/ panglunsod - if political party: add'l req. of certication and nomination 2. Panglunsod of component cities - Governor 3. Sanggu Pambarangay - Mayor appoints with the recommendation of the Barangay Chair drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 62 cerLlflcaLlon from any pollLlcal parLy. lor sooqqoolooq botooqoy members, lL ls Lhe mayor who appolnLs upon recommendaLlon of Lhe sooqqoolooq botooqoy (lotloos vs. 8otbo, C.k. No. 1167J, Aptll 19, 1996).
1.4 ln case of vacancy ln Lhe sooqqoolooq boyoo, Lhe nomlnee of Lhe parLy under whlch Lhe member concerned was elecLed and whose elevaLlon Lo Lhe hlgher poslLlon creaLed Lhe lasL vacancy wlll be appolnLed. 1he lasL vacancy refers Lo LhaL creaLed by Lhe elevaLlon of Lhe councllor as vlce- mayor. 1he reason behlnd Lhe rule ls Lo malnLaln parLy represenLaLlon (Novotto vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 141J07, Motcb 28, 2001).
1.3 lor purposes of successlon ln Lhe fllllng up of vacancles under SecLlon 44 of 1991 LCC, Lhe ranklng ln Lhe sanggunlan shall be deLermlned on Lhe basls of Lhe proporLlon of voLes obLalned by each wlnnlng candldaLes Lo Lhe LoLal number of reglsLered voLers ln each dlsLrlcL ln Lhe lmmedlaLely precedlng local elecLlon, noL Lhe number of voLers who acLually voLed (vlctotlo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 109005, Iooooty 10, 1994).
1.6 1he hlghesL-ranklng munlclpal councllor's successlon Lo Lhe offlce of vlce- mayor cannoL be consldered a volunLary renunclaLlon of hls/her offlce as councllor slnce lL occurred by operaLlon of law (Mooteboo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 180444, Aptll 08, 2008).
1.7 8eslgnaLlons by sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo members musL submlL Lhelr leLLers of reslgnaLlon Lo Lhe resldenL or Lo hls/her alLer ego, Lhe SecreLary of Lhe lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL. 1he leLLer musL be submlLLed, recelved and acLed upon by Lhe supervlslng offlclals, oLherwlse, Lhere was no valld and compleLe reslgnaLlon (5ooqqoolooq 8oyoo of 5oo AoJtes vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 11888J, Iooooty 16, 1998).
1.8 When Lhe vlce-Covernor exerclses Lhe powers and duLles of Lhe Cfflce of Lhe Covernor, he/she does noL assume Lhe laLLer offlce. Pe/she only acLs as Lhe Covernor buL does noL 'become' Lhe Covernor. Pls/her assumpLlon of Lhe powers of Lhe provlnclal Chlef LxecuLlve does noL creaLe a permanenL vacuum or vacancy ln hls/her poslLlon as Lhe vlce- Covernor. 8uL he/she does Lemporarlly rellnqulsh Lhe powers of Lhe vlce- Covernor, lncludlng Lhe power Lo preslde over Lhe sesslons of Lhe Sanggu Ranking: Proportion of votes obtained to TOTAL # registered voters Sanggu complete resignation: submitted and received by President or Sec. of DILG drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 63 sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo (Comboo vs. Aqoltte, et. ol., C.k. No. 1J421J, Ioly 20, 1999).
1.9 Absence should be reasonably consLrued Lo mean 'effecLlve' absence, l.e., one LhaL renders Lhe offlcer concerned powerless, for Lhe Llme belng, Lo dlscharge Lhe powers and prerogaLlves of hls/her offlce. 1here ls no vacancy whenever Lhe offlce ls occupled by a legally quallfled lncumbenL. A seoso coottotlo, Lhere ls a vacancy when Lhere ls no person lawfully auLhorlzed Lo assume and exerclse aL presenL Lhe duLles of Lhe offlce (Comboo vs. Aqoltte, et. ol., C.k. No. 1J421J, Ioly 20, 1999).
?723 P5 +**'F(.+Q$)$.K 'D )'*+) ,'#"!(-"(. F($.C +(N 'DD$*$+)C
?$"K2,2#5 "/: *2"K2,2#5
1. LCus have Lhe power Lo sue and be sued (5ectloo 22 jo]j2], 1991 lCc). 8ecause of Lhe sLaLuLory walver, LCus are noL lmmune from sulL.
2. LCus and Lhelr offlclals are noL exempL from llablllLy for deaLh or ln[ury Lo persons or damage Lo properLy (5ectloo 24, 1991 lCc).
3. 1he LesL of llablllLy of Lhe munlclpallLy depends on wheLher or noL Lhe drlver, acLlng on behalf of Lhe munlclpallLy, ls performlng governmenLal or proprleLary funcLlons. 1he dlsLlncLlon of powers becomes lmporLanL for purposes of deLermlnlng Lhe llablllLy of Lhe munlclpallLy for Lhe acLs of lLs agenLs whlch resulL ln an ln[ury Lo Lhlrd persons. under Lhe 1983 Local CovernmenL Code, LCus are exempL from llablllLy whlle ln Lhe performance of Lhelr offlclal funcLlons. uellvery of sand and gravel for Lhe consLrucLlon of a munlclpal brldge ls ln Lhe exerclse of Lhe governmenLal capaclLy of LCus (Moolclpollty of 5oo letoooJo, lo uoloo vs. lltme, C.k. No. l- 52179, Aptll 8, 1991). under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lhe dlsLlncLlon beLween governmenLal and proprleLary powers has been removed.
*2"K2,2#5 () *(+", -(.&%/0&/# 1/2#3
1. When Lhere ls no mallce or bad falLh LhaL aLLended Lhe lllegal dlsmlssal and refusal Lo relnsLaLe on Lhe parL of Lhe munlclpal offlclals, Lhey cannoL be held personally accounLable for Lhe back salarles. 1he munlclpal governmenL should dlsburse funds Effective absence: powerless to discharge powers and functions Distinction of powers: governmental or Proprietary to determine liability ???? drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 64 Lo answer for Lhe clalms resulLlng from Lhe dlsmlssal (clvll 5etvlce commlssloo vs. Ceotolloo, C.k. No. 1528JJ Moy 09, 2005).
2. 1he LCu ls llable for Lhe lllegal dlsmlssal of an appolnLlve employee and Lhe appolnLmenL ln hls/her sLead of anoLher, a non-clvll servlce ellglble, whose salarles lL LhereafLer pald. 1he dlsmlssal by Lhe mayor was conflrmed and raLlfled when Lhe clLy dld noL oppose Lhe dlsmlssal and Lhe appolnLmenL (keqls, It. vs. Osmeo, It., C.k. No. 26785, Moy 2J, 1991).
3. An LCu ls llable for ln[urles susLalned due Lo defecLlve roads and manholes. lor llablllLy Lo arlse under ArLlcle 2189 of Lhe Clvll Code, ownershlp of Lhe roads, sLreeLs, brldges, publlc bulldlngs and oLher publlc works ls noL a conLrolllng facLor, lL belng sufflclenL LhaL a provlnce, clLy or munlclpallLy has conLrol or supervlslon Lhereof (Moolclpollty of 5oo Iooo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 121920, Aoqost 9, 2005, Collotco vs. uoqopoo, C.k. No. 61516, Motcb 21, 1989).
4. lnasmuch as Lhe llcense for Lhe esLabllshmenL of a cockplL ls a mere prlvllege whlch can be suspended aL any Llme by compeLenL auLhorlLy, Lhe flxlng ln a munlclpal ordlnance of a dlsLance of noL less Lhan Lwo kllomeLers beLween one cockplL and anoLher, ls noL sufflclenL Lo warranL Lhe annulmenL of such ordlnance on Lhe ground LhaL lL ls parLlal, even Lhough lL ls pre[udlclal Lo an already esLabllshed cockplL (AboJ vs. vooqellsto, C.k. No. J8884, 5eptembet 26, 19JJ).
*2"K2,2#5 () *(+", E))2+2",3
1. 1he power of supervlslon ls compaLlble wlLh Lhe power Lo dlsclpllne. 1he power Lo dlsclpllne does noL amounL Lo execuLlve conLrol whlch ls proscrlbed under SecLlon, 4, ArLlcle x of Lhe 1987 ConsLlLuLlon.
1.1 1he resldenL's power of general supervlslon means no more Lhan Lhe power of ensurlng LhaL laws are falLhfully execuLed, or LhaL subordlnaLe offlcers acL wlLhln Lhe law. Supervlslon ls noL lncompaLlble wlLh dlsclpllne. 1he power Lo dlsclpllne and ensure LhaL Lhe laws be falLhfully execuLed musL be consLrued Lo auLhorlze Lhe resldenL Lo order an lnvesLlgaLlon of Lhe acL or conducL of local offlclals when ln hls/her oplnlon Lhe good of Lhe publlc servlce so requlres (Iosoo vs. 1ottes, C.k. No. 1J1255, Moy 20, 1998).
Power of supervision includes power to discipline drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 63 1.2 !urlsdlcLlon over admlnlsLraLlve dlsclpllnary acLlons agalnsL elecLlve local offlclals ls lodged ln Lwo auLhorlLles: Lhe ulsclpllnlng AuLhorlLy and Lhe lnvesLlgaLlng AuLhorlLy. 1he ulsclpllnary AuLhorlLy may consLlLuLe a Speclal lnvesLlgaLlng CommlLLee ln lleu of Lhe SecreLary of Lhe lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL. WlLh respecL Lo a provlnclal governor, Lhe dlsclpllnlng AuLhorlLy ls Lhe resldenL of Lhe hlllpplnes, wheLher acLlng by hlmself/herself or Lhrough Lhe LxecuLlve SecreLary (Iosoo vs. 1ottes, C.k. No. 1J1255, Moy 20, 1998).
1.3 1he SecreLary of Lhe lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL ls Lhe lnvesLlgaLlng AuLhorlLy, who may acL hlmself/ herself or consLlLuLe and lnvesLlgaLlng CommlLLee. 1he SecreLary of Lhe ueparLmenL, however, ls noL Lhe excluslve lnvesLlgaLlng AuLhorlLy. ln lleu of Lhe ueparLmenL SecreLary, Lhe ulsclpllnlng AuLhorlLy may deslgnaLe a Speclal lnvesLlgaLlng CommlLLee (Iosoo vs. 1ottes, C.k. No. 1J1255, Moy 20, 1998).
2. 1he grounds for dlsclpllnary acLlon agalnsL local elecLlve offlclals are: (1) ulsloyalLy Lo Lhe 8epubllc of Lhe hlllpplnes, (2) Culpable vlolaLlon of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon, (3) ulshonesLy, oppresslon, mlsconducL ln offlce, gross negllgence, or derellcLlon of duLy, (4) Commlsslon of any offense lnvolvlng moral LurplLude or an offense punlshable by aL leasL ptlsloo moyot, (3) Abuse of auLhorlLy, (6) unauLhorlzed absence for flfLeen (13) consecuLlve worklng days, excepL ln Lhe case of members of Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo, sooqqoolooq poolooqsoJ, sooqqoolooq boyoo, and sooqqoolooq botooqoy, (7) AppllcaLlon for, or acqulslLlon of, forelgn clLlzenshlp or resldence or Lhe sLaLus of an lmmlgranL of anoLher counLry, and (8) Such oLher grounds as may be provlded ln 1991 LCC and oLher laws (5ectloo 60, 1991 lCc).
3. 1he basls of admlnlsLraLlve llablllLy dlffers from crlmlnal llablllLy. 1he purpose of admlnlsLraLlve proceedlngs ls malnly Lo proLecL Lhe publlc servlce, based on Lhe Llme-honored prlnclple LhaL a publlc offlce ls a publlc LrusL. Cn Lhe oLher hand, Lhe purpose of Lhe crlmlnal prosecuLlon ls Lhe punlshmenL of crlme. Powever, Lhe re- elecLlon of a publlc offlclal exLlngulshes only Lhe admlnlsLraLlve, buL noL Lhe crlmlnal, llablllLy lncurred by hlm/her durlng hls/her prevlous Lerm of offlce (voleoclo vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 141JJ6, Iooe 29, 2004).
4. An admlnlsLraLlve offense" means every acL or conducL or omlsslon whlch amounLs Lo, or consLlLuLes, any of Lhe grounds for dlsclpllnary acLlon (5olollmo vs. Coloqooo, C.k. No. 117589-92, Moy 22, 1996).
Disciplining: President Investigating Authority: Sec of DILG - Jurisdiction over admin disciplinary actions for elective local ofcials drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 66 4.1 A munlclpal mayor, vlce-mayor and Lreasurer were gullLy of Lwo (2) counLs of vlolaLlon of Lhe AnLl-CrafL and CorrupL racLlces AcL where Lhey knowlngly slmulaLed a blddlng/canvasslng ln favor of Lhe mayor's son (ue Iesos, 5t. vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. Nos. 1825J9-40, lebtooty 2J, 2011).
4.2 1here are Lwo modes by whlch a publlc offlcer who has a dlrecL or lndlrecL flnanclal or pecunlary lnLeresL ln any buslness, conLracL, or LransacLlon may vlolaLe SecLlon 3(h) of Lhe AnLl-CrafL and CorrupL racLlces AcL. 1he flrsL mode ls lf ln connecLlon wlLh hls/her pecunlary lnLeresL ln any buslness, conLracL or LransacLlon, Lhe publlc offlcer lnLervenes or Lakes parL ln hls/her offlclal capaclLy. 1he second mode ls when he/she ls prohlblLed from havlng such lnLeresL by Lhe ConsLlLuLlon or any law. A mayor relaLlve Lo Lhe lssuance of a llcense Lo operaLe a cockplL whlch he/she owns cannoL be held llable under Lhe flrsL mode slnce he/she could noL have lnLervened or Laken parL ln hls/her offlclal capaclLy ln Lhe lssuance of a cockplL llcense because he/she was noL a member of Lhe sooqqoolooq boyoo. under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lhe granL of a llcense ls a leglslaLlve acL of Lhe sooqqooloo. Powever, Lhe mayor could be llable under Lhe second mode. (uomloqo vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 149175 Octobet 25, 2005, 1eves vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 154182, uecembet 17, 2004).
4.3 When Lhe valldlLy of subsequenL appolnLmenLs Lo Lhe poslLlon of AsslsLanL ClLy Assessor has noL been challenged, Lhe clLy mayor who appolnLed a person Lo serve ln sald poslLlon had every rlghL Lo assume ln good falLh LhaL Lhe one who held Lhe poslLlon prlor Lo Lhe appolnLmenLs no longer held Lhe same. 1hus, Lhe clLy mayor ls noL llable for vlolaLlon of SecLlons 3(a) and 3(e) of Lhe AnLl-CrafL and CorrupL racLlces AcL (keyes vs. Atleozo, C.k. No. 15224J 5eptembet 2J, 2005).
4.4 1o be crlmlnally llable for vlolaLlon of SecLlon 3(e) of 8.A. 3019, Lhe ln[ury susLalned musL have been caused by poslLlve or passlve acLs of manlfesL parLlallLy, evldenL bad falLh, or gross lnexcusable negllgence. Slnce Lhe SLaLe AudlLors even recommended LhaL munlclpal offlclals should noL pay Lhe clalms due Lo lrregularlLles ln Lhe LransacLlons and Lhe paLenL nulllLy of Lhe same, lL cannoL be sald LhaL Lhe ln[ury clalmed Lo have been susLalned by was caused by any of offlclals' overL acLs (loeotes vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 164664, Ioly 20, 2006).
1. Pecuniary interest and intervenes in ofcial capacity 2. prohibited from having such interest by the Constitution drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 67 4.3 1he lssuance of a cerLlflcaLlon as Lo avallablllLy of funds for Lhe paymenL of Lhe wages and salarles of local offlclals awalLlng appolnLmenL by Lhe Clvll Servlce Commlsslon (CSC) ls noL a mlnlsLerlal funcLlon of Lhe clLy Lreasurer. Slnce Lhe CSC has noL yeL approved Lhe appolnLmenL, Lhere were yeL no servlces performed Lo speak of, and Lhere was yeL no due and demandable obllgaLlon (Alttes vs. mpleo, C.k. No. 180986, uecembet 10, 2008).
4.6 A munlclpal mayor ls mandaLed Lo ablde by Lhe 1991 LCC whlch dlrecLs LhaL execuLlve offlclals and employees of Lhe munlclpallLy falLhfully dlscharge Lhelr duLles and funcLlons as provlded by law. Such duLy lncludes enforclng declslons or flnal resoluLlons, orders or rullngs of Lhe Clvll Servlce Commlsslon (CSC). (velosco vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 160991, lebtooty 28, 2005).
4.7 A munlclpal mayor ls noL gullLy of vlolaLlng SecLlon 3(e) of Lhe AnLl-CrafL and CorrupL racLlces AcL ln lssulng a Memorandum prevenLlng vendors wlLh quesLlonable lease conLracLs from occupylng markeL sLalls where Lhe sald Memorandum applles equlLably Lo all awardees of lease conLracLs, and dld noL glve any unwarranLed beneflL, advanLage, or preference Lo any parLlcular prlvaLe parLy (leople vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 15J952-71, Aoqost 2J, 2010).
4.8 All heads of offlces have Lo rely Lo a reasonable exLenL on Lhelr subordlnaLes and on Lhe good falLh of Lhose who prepare blds, purchase supplles, or enLer lnLo negoLlaLlons. A publlc offlcer cannoL be expecLed Lo probe records, lnspecL documenLs, and quesLlon persons before he/she slgns vouchers presenLed for hls/her slgnaLure unless Lhere ls some added reason why he/she should examlne each voucher ln such deLall. When an excepLlonal clrcumsLance exlsL whlch should have prodded Lhe offlcer, and lf he/she were ouL Lo proLecL Lhe lnLeresL of Lhe munlclpallLy he/she swore Lo serve, he/she ls expecLed go beyond whaL hls/her subordlnaLes prepared or recommended (leycooo vs. commlssloo oo AoJlt, C.k. No. 154665, lebtooty 10, 2006).
4.9 Munlclpal employees were gullLy of falslflcaLlon of publlc documenLs where Lhey falled Lo dlsclose ln Lhelr SLaLemenLs of AsseLs and LlablllLles (SALn) Lhelr relaLlonshlp wlLhln Lhe fourLh clvll degree of consangulnlLy and afflnlLy Lo Lhe munlclpal mayor who appolnLed Lhem Lo Lhelr drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 68 poslLlons (Coleos vs. leople, C.k. Nos. 1747J0-J7 / 174845-52, lebtooty 9, 2011).
4.10 When a complalnL merely alleges LhaL Lhe dlsbursemenL for flnanclal asslsLance was nelLher auLhorlzed by law nor [usLlfled as a lawful expense and no law or ordlnance was clLed LhaL provlded for an orlglnal approprlaLlon of Lhe amounL used for Lhe flnanclal asslsLance and LhaL lL was dlverLed from Lhe approprlaLlon lL was lnLended for, Lhe complalnL ls defecLlve as lL does noL prove Lechnlcal malversaLlon (1etooqco vs. OmboJsmoo, C.k. No. 156427, Iooooty 20, 2006).
4.11 A candldaLe's convlcLlon by flnal [udgmenL of Lhe crlme of fenclng ls a crlme lnvolvlng moral LurplLude whlch dlsquallfles such a person from elecLlve publlc offlce under SecLlon 40(a) of Lhe 1991 LCC (uelo 1otte vs. comelec, C.k. No. 121592, Ioly 5, 1996).
4.12 A publlc offlclal, more especlally an elecLed one, should noL be onlon sklnned. SLrlcL personal dlsclpllne ls expecLed of an occupanL of a publlc offlce because a publlc offlclal ls a properLy of Lhe publlc (obot vs. OmboJsmoo, C.k. No. 111J04, Iooe 17, 1994).
4.13 A mayor who conLlnues Lo perform Lhe funcLlons of Lhe offlce desplLe Lhe facL LhaL he/she ls under prevenLlve suspenslon usurps Lhe auLhorlLy of Lhe Cfflce of Lhe Mayor and ls llable for vlolaLlon of SecLlon 13 of Lhe AnLl-CrafL and CorrupL racLlces AcL (MltooJo vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 154098, Ioly 27, 2005).
;:02/23#%"#2.& B%(+&&:2/@3
1. A verlfled complalnL agalnsL any errlng local elecLlve offlclal shall be prepared as follows: (1) A complalnL agalnsL any elecLlve offlclal of a provlnce, a hlghly urbanlzed clLy, an lndependenL componenL clLy or componenL clLy shall be flled before Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL, (2) A complalnL agalnsL any elecLlve offlclal of a munlclpallLy shall be flled before Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo whose declslon may be appealed Lo Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL, and (3) A complalnL agalnsL any elecLlve barangay offlclal shall be flled before Lhe sooqqoolooq poolooqsoJ or sooqqoolooq boyoo concerned whose declslon shall be flnal and execuLor (5ectloo 61, 1991 lCc).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 69 2. ln admlnlsLraLlve proceedlngs, procedural due process slmply means Lhe opporLunlLy Lo explaln one's slde or Lhe opporLunlLy Lo seek a reconslderaLlon of Lhe acLlon or rullng complalned of. rocedural due process has been recognlzed Lo lnclude Lhe followlng: (1) Lhe rlghL Lo acLual or consLrucLlve noLlce of Lhe lnsLlLuLlon of proceedlngs whlch may affecL a respondenL's legal rlghLs, (2) a real opporLunlLy Lo be heard personally or wlLh Lhe asslsLance of counsel, Lo presenL wlLnesses and evldence ln one's favor, and Lo defend one's rlghLs, (3) a Lrlbunal vesLed wlLh compeLenL [urlsdlcLlon and so consLlLuLed as Lo afford a person charged admlnlsLraLlvely a reasonable guaranLee of honesLy as well as lmparLlallLy, and (4) a flndlng by sald Lrlbunal whlch ls supporLed by subsLanLlal evldence submlLLed for conslderaLlon durlng Lhe hearlng or conLalned ln Lhe records or made known Lo Lhe parLles affecLed (coslmlto vs. 1ooJoq, C.k. No. 1461J7, Iooe 8, 2005).
2.1 under Lhe 1991 LCC, an elecLlve local offlclal musL be a clLlzen of Lhe hlllpplnes. Cne who clalms LhaL a local offlclal ls noL has Lhe burden of provlng hls/her clalm. ln admlnlsLraLlve cases and peLlLlons for dlsquallflcaLlon, Lhe quanLum of proof requlred ls subsLanLlal evldence (Motoqos vs. comelec, C.k. No. 151944, Iooooty 20, 2004).
2.2 1he lack of verlflcaLlon ln a leLLer-complalnL may be walved, Lhe defecL noL belng faLal. verlflcaLlon ls a formal, noL [urlsdlcLlonal requlslLe (Iosoo vs. 1ottes, C.k. No. 1J1255, Moy 20, 1998).
2.3 under SecLlon 61 of Lhe 1991 LCC, a complalnL agalnsL any elecLlve offlclal of a munlclpallLy shall be flled before Lhe sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo whose declslon may be appealed Lo Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL (8olloJooq vs. uocolos, C.k. No. 158874, Novembet 10, 2004).
2.4 1he voLlng followlng Lhe dellberaLlon of Lhe members of Lhe sooqqooloo ln admlnlsLraLlve cases does noL consLlLuLe Lhe declslon unless Lhls was embodled ln an oplnlon prepared by one of Lhem and concurred ln by Lhe ma[orlLy. unLll Lhey have slgned Lhe oplnlon and Lhe declslon ls promulgaLed, Lhe councllors are free Lo change Lhelr voLes. no noLlce of Lhe sesslon where a declslon of Lhe sooqqooloo ls Lo be promulgaLed on Lhe admlnlsLraLlve case ls requlred Lo be glven Lo Lhe anymperson. 1he dellberaLlon of Lhe sooqqooloo ls an lnLernal maLLer (Mollooo vs. keyes, C.k. No. 117618, Motcb 29, 1996).
1. Notice 2. Opportunity to be heard 3. Present witnesses and defend rights 4. Tribunal with competent jurisdiction (honesty and impartiality) 5. Finding based on evidence drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 70 B&/",#2&3
1. Cnly Lhe courLs can remove a local elecLlve offlclal.
1.1 1he 8ules and 8egulaLlons lmplemenLlng Lhe 1991 LCC, lnsofar as lL vesLs power on Lhe dlsclpllnlng auLhorlLy" Lo remove from offlce errlng elecLlve local offlclals, ls vold. Local leglslaLlve bodles and/or Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL on appeal cannoL valldly lmpose Lhe penalLy of dlsmlssal from servlce on errlng elecLlve local offlclals. lL ls beyond cavll LhaL Lhe power Lo remove errlng elecLlve local offlclals from servlce ls lodged excluslvely wlLh Lhe courLs (lobllco vs. vlllopooJo, C.k. No. 147870, Ioly J1, 2002).
1.2 1he sooqqoolooq boyoo ls noL empowered Lo remove an elecLlve local offlclal from offlce. SecLlon 60 of Lhe 1991 LCC conferred excluslvely on Lhe courLs such power. 1hus, lf Lhe acLs allegedly commlLLed by a barangay offlclal are of a grave naLure and, lf found gullLy, would merlL Lhe penalLy of removal from offlce, Lhe case should be flled wlLh Lhe reglonal Lrlal courL (5ooqqoolooq 8otooqoy of uoo Motlooo Motcos, 8oyombooq vs. looooq 8otooqoy Mottloez, C.k. No. 170626, Motcb J, 2008).
1.3 A sanggunlang panlalawlgan may cause Lhe removal of a munlclpal mayor who dld noL appeal Lo Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL wlLhln Lhe reglemenLary perlod Lhe declslon removlng hlm/her from offlce (keyes vs. comelec, C.k. No. 120905, Motcb 7, 1996).
1.4 1he resldenL may suspend an errlng provlnclal elecLed offlclal who commlLLed several admlnlsLraLlve offenses for an aggregaLe perlod exceedlng slx monLhs provlded LhaL each admlnlsLraLlve offense, Lhe perlod of suspenslon does noL exceed Lhe 6-monLh llmlL (5olollmo vs. Coloqooo, C.k. No. 117589-92, Moy 22, 1996).
B%&.&/#2.& ?$36&/32(/
1. revenLlve suspenslon ls merely a prevenLlve measure, a prellmlnary sLep ln an admlnlsLraLlve lnvesLlgaLlon. 1hls ls noL a penalLy.
??? 6 month limit suspension NOT A PENALTY drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 71 2. 1he purpose of Lhe suspenslon order ls Lo prevenL Lhe accused from uslng hls/her poslLlon and Lhe powers and prerogaLlves of hls/her offlce Lo lnfluence poLenLlal wlLnesses or Lamper wlLh records whlch may be vlLal ln Lhe prosecuLlon of Lhe case agalnsL hlm/her.
lf afLer such lnvesLlgaLlon, Lhe charge ls esLabllshed and Lhe person lnvesLlgaLed ls found gullLy of acLs warranLlng hls/her suspenslon or removal, Lhen he/she ls suspended, removed or dlsmlssed. 1hls ls Lhe penalLy. noL belng a penalLy, Lhe perlod wlLhln whlch one ls under prevenLlve suspenslon ls noL consldered parL of Lhe acLual penalLy of suspenslon. 1hus, servlce of Lhe prevenLlve suspenslon cannoL be credlLed as servlce of penalLy (Oolmbo vs. Cetvoclo, C.k. No. 155620, Aoqost 09, 2005).
3. A prevenLlve suspenslon may be lmposed by Lhe dlsclpllnary auLhorlLy aL any Llme: (1) afLer Lhe lssues are [olned, l.e., respondenL has flled an answer, (2) when Lhe evldence of gullL ls sLrong, and (3) glven Lhe gravlLy of Lhe offenses, Lhere ls greaL probablllLy LhaL Lhe respondenL, who conLlnues Lo hold offlce, could lnfluence Lhe wlLnesses or pose a LhreaL Lo Lhe safeLy and lnLegrlLy of Lhe records and oLher evldence. 1hese are Lhe pre-requlslLes. Powever, Lhe fallure of respondenL Lo flle hls/her answer desplLe several opporLunlLles glven hlm/her ls consLrued as a walver of hls/her rlghL Lo presenL evldence ln hls/her behalf. ln Lhls slLuaLlon, a prevenLlve suspenslon may be lmposed even lf an answer has noL been flled (Iosoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 160652, lebtooty 1J, 2006).
3.1 1he rule under Lhe Cmbudsman AcL of 1989 ls dlfferenL. Cmbudsman AcL of 1989 does noL requlre LhaL noLlce and hearlng precede Lhe prevenLlve suspenslon of an errlng offlclal. Cnly Lwo requlslLes musL concur Lo render Lhe prevenLlve suspenslon order valld. llrsL, Lhere musL a prlor deLermlnaLlon by Lhe Cmbudsman LhaL Lhe evldence of respondenL's gullL ls sLrong. Second, (1) Lhe offense charged musL lnvolve dlshonesLy, oppresslon, grave mlsconducL or neglecL ln Lhe performance of duLy, (2) Lhe charges would warranL removal from Lhe servlce, or (3) Lhe respondenL's conLlnued sLay ln Lhe offlce may pre[udlce Lhe case flled agalnsL hlm (cotobeo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. Nos. 178000/ 17800J, uecembet 4, 2009).
3.2 SecLlon 63 of Lhe 1991 LCC whlch provldes for a 60-day maxlmum perlod for prevenLlve suspenslon for a slngle offense does noL govern prevenLlve suspenslons lmposed by Lhe Cmbudsman. under Lhe Cmbudsman AcL, Lhe prevenLlve suspenslon shall conLlnue unLll Lhe case ls LermlnaLed by Under Ombudsman Act, no need notice and hearing to precede preventive suspension drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 72 Lhe Cfflce of Lhe Cmbudsman buL noL more Lhan slx monLhs (MltooJo vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 154098, Ioly 27, 2005).
3.3 under Lhe 1991 LCC, a slngle prevenLlve suspenslon of local elecLlve offlclals should noL go beyond 60 days. 1hus, Lhe Sandlganbayan cannoL prevenLlvely suspend a mayor for 90 days (klos vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 12991J 5eptembet 26, 1997).
4. ulrecL recourse Lo Lhe courLs wlLhouL exhausLlng admlnlsLraLlve remedles ls noL permlLLed. 1hus, a mayor who clalms LhaL Lhe lmposlLlon of prevenLlve suspenslon by Lhe governor was un[usLlfled and pollLlcally moLlvaLed, should seek rellef flrsL from Lhe SecreLary of Lhe lnLerlor and Local CovernmenL, noL from Lhe courLs (spltlto vs. Melqot, C.k. No. 100874, lebtooty 1J, 1992).
4.1 A munlclpal offlclal placed under prevenLlve suspenslon by a sooqqoolooq poololowlqoo musL flle a moLlon for reconslderaLlon before Lhe sald sanggunlan before flllng a peLlLlon for cerLlorarl wlLh Lhe CourL of Appeals (llotes vs. 5ooqqoolooq loololowlqoo of lompooqo, C.k. No. 159022, lebtooty 2J, 2005).
4.2 A munlclpal mayor may flle before Lhe CourL of Appeals a peLlLlon for cerLlorarl, lnsLead of a peLlLlon for revlew assalllng Lhe declslon of Lhe Cfflce of Lhe resldenL whlch relnsLaLes Lhe prevenLlve suspenslon order lssued by Lhe provlnclal governor. 1he speclal clvll acLlon of cerLlorarl ls proper Lo correcL errors of [urlsdlcLlon lncludlng Lhe commlsslon of grave abuse of dlscreLlon amounLlng Lo lack or excess of [urlsdlcLlon. LxhausLlon of admlnlsLraLlve remedles may be dlspensed wlLh when pure quesLlons of law are lnvolved (Iosoo vs. coott of Appeols, C.k. No. 160652, lebtooty 1J, 2006).
=))&+# () D&L=,&+#2(/
1. An admlnlsLraLlve case has become mooL and academlc as a resulL of Lhe explraLlon of Lerm of offlce of an elecLlve local offlclal durlng whlch Lhe acL complalned of was allegedly commlLLed. roceedlngs agalnsL respondenL are Lherefor barred by hls/her re-elecLlon (Mollooo vs. keyes, C.k. No. 117618, Motcb 29, 1996).
drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 73 1.1 A reelecLed local offlclal may noL be held admlnlsLraLlvely accounLable for mlsconducL commlLLed durlng hls/her prlor Lerm of offlce. 1he raLlonale for Lhls holdlng ls LhaL when Lhe elecLoraLe puL hlm/her back lnLo offlce, lL ls presumed LhaL lL dld so wlLh full knowledge of hls/her llfe and characLer, lncludlng hls/her pasL mlsconducL. lf, armed wlLh such knowledge, lL sLlll reelecLs hlm/her, Lhen such reelecLlon ls consldered a condonaLlon of hls/her pasL mlsdeeds (voleoclo vs. 5ooJlqooboyoo, C.k. No. 141JJ6, Iooe 29, 2004).
1.2 A publlc offlclal cannoL be removed for admlnlsLraLlve mlsconducL commlLLed durlng a prlor Lerm slnce hls/her re-elecLlon Lo offlce operaLes as a condonaLlon. 1o do oLherwlse would be Lo deprlve Lhe people of Lhelr rlghL Lo elecL Lhelr offlcers. When Lhe people have elecLed a person Lo offlce, lL musL be assumed LhaL Lhey dld Lhls wlLh knowledge of hls/her llfe and characLer LhaL Lhey dlsregarded or forgave hls/her faulL, lf he/she had been gullLy of any (5olollmo vs. Coloqooo, C.k. No. 117589-92, Moy 22, 1996).
1.3 1he elecLoraLe's condonaLlon of Lhe prevlous admlnlsLraLlve lnfracLlons of reelecLed offlclals cannoL be exLended Lo LhaL of reappolnLed coLermlnous employees. ln Lhe laLLer's case, Lhere ls nelLher subverslon of Lhe soverelgn wlll nor dlsenfranchlsemenL of Lhe elecLoraLe Lo speak of. lL ls Lhe populace's wlll, noL Lhe whlm of Lhe appolnLlng auLhorlLy, LhaL could exLlngulsh an admlnlsLraLlve llablllLy (5olomblJes vs. Offlce of tbe OmboJsmoo, C.k. No.180917, Aptll 2J, 2010).
?723 R5 ?"'?)"HC ?+!.$*$?+.$'(
J&/$&3 )(% B(6$,"% B"%#2+26"#2(/
1. 1here are seven venues by whlch ordlnary clLlzens, non-governmenLal and people's organlzaLlons can parLlclpaLe ln local governance. 1hese are: (1) local speclal bodles, (2) prlor mandaLory consulLaLlon, (3) recall, (4) dlsclpllnary acLlon, (3) lnlLlaLlve and referendum, (6) secLoral represenLaLlon, and (7) parLnershlp and asslsLance.
B%2(% M"/:"#(%5 7(/3$,#"#2(/
Does that mean admin proceedings can still be conducted against appointive ofcials for acts committed in their previous term? drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 74 1. rlor Lo Lhe lmplemenLaLlon of naLlonal pro[ecLs, Lhe prlor approval by Lhe LCu and prlor consulLaLlon wlLh affecLed secLors are requlred (5ectloos ooJ 27, 1991 lCc).
1.1 1he granL of an LnvlronmenLal Clearance CerLlflcaLe by Lhe ueparLmenL of LnvlronmenL and naLural 8esources ln favor of naLlonal ower CorporaLlon of Lhe consLrucLlon of a moorlng faclllLy does noL vlolaLe SecLlons 26 and 27 of Lhe 1991 LCC. 1he moorlng faclllLy lLself ls noL envlronmenLally crlLlcal and hence does noL belong Lo any of Lhe slx Lypes of pro[ecLs menLloned ln Lhe law. 1he pro[ecLs and programs menLloned ln SecLlon 27 should be lnLerpreLed Lo mean pro[ecLs and programs whose effecLs are among Lhose enumeraLed ln SecLlons 26 and 27, Lo wlL, Lhose LhaL: (1) may cause polluLlon, (2) may brlng abouL cllmaLlc change, (3) may cause Lhe depleLlon of non-renewable resources, (4) may resulL ln loss of crop land, rangeland, or foresL cover, (3) may eradlcaLe cerLaln anlmal or planL specles, and (6) oLher pro[ecLs or programs LhaL may call for Lhe evlcLlon of a parLlcular group of people resldlng ln Lhe locallLy where Lhese wlll be lmplemenLed. lL ls anoLher maLLer lf Lhe operaLlon of Lhe power barge ls aL lssue (8ooqos lty llsbetfolk ulwoto Moqbobos vs. loozooos, C.k. No. 1J1442, Ioly 10, 200J).
1.2 1he 1991 LCC requlres conference wlLh Lhe affecLed communlLles of a governmenL pro[ecL. 1hus, before Lhe naLlonal ower CorporaLlon energlzes and LransmlLs hlgh volLage elecLrlc currenL Lhrough lLs cables ln connecLlon wlLh ower 1ransmlsslon ro[ecL whlch could cause lllnesses, Lhe requlremenLs seL forLh ln SecLlon 27 of Lhe 1991 LCC musL be followed (netoooJez vs. Notloool lowet cotpototloo, C.k. No. 145J28, Motcb 2J, 2006).
1.3 under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lwo requlslLes musL be meL before a naLlonal pro[ecL LhaL affecLs Lhe envlronmenLal and ecologlcal balance of local communlLles can be lmplemenLed: prlor consulLaLlon wlLh Lhe affecLed local communlLles, and prlor approval of Lhe pro[ecL by Lhe approprlaLe sooqqooloo. AbsenL elLher of Lhese mandaLory requlremenLs, Lhe pro[ecL's lmplemenLaLlon ls lllegal. 1he esLabllshmenL of a dumpslLe/landflll by Lhe naLlonal governmenL and Lhe MeLropollLan Manlla uevelopmenL AuLhorlLy requlres compllance wlLh Lhese requlremenLs (ltovloce of klzol vs. xecotlve 5ectetoty, C.k. No. 129546, uecembet 1J, 2005).
1. prior consultation 2. prior approval with the sanggu drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 73 1.4 1he requlremenL of prlor consulLaLlon and approval under SecLlons 2(c) and 27 of Lhe 1991 LCC applles only Lo naLlonal programs and/or pro[ecLs whlch are Lo be lmplemenLed ln a parLlcular local communlLy. LoLLo ls nelLher a program nor a pro[ecL of Lhe naLlonal governmenL, buL of a charlLable lnsLlLuLlon, Lhe hlllpplne CharlLy SweepsLakes Cfflce. 1hough sancLloned by Lhe naLlonal governmenL, lL ls far-feLched Lo say LhaL loLLo falls wlLhln Lhe conLemplaLlon of Lhe law (lloo, It. vs. loo, C.k. No. 12909J, Aoqost J0, 2001).
A/2#2"#2.& "/: D&)&%&/:$0
1. 1he voLers have Lhe power of lnlLlaLlve and referendum.
1.1 Local lnlLlaLlve ls Lhe legal process whereby Lhe reglsLered voLers of an LCu may dlrecLly propose, enacL, or amend any ordlnance (5ectloo 120, 1991 lCc).
1.2 Local referendum ls Lhe legal process whereby Lhe reglsLered voLers of Lhe LCus may approve, amend or re[ecL any ordlnance enacLed by Lhe sooqqooloo (5ectloo 126, 1991 lCc).
1.3 lnlLlaLlve ls resorLed Lo or lnlLlaLed by Lhe people dlrecLly elLher because Lhe law-maklng body falls or refuses Lo enacL Lhe law, ordlnance, resoluLlon or acL LhaL Lhey deslre or because Lhey wanL Lo amend or modlfy one already exlsLlng. Cn Lhe oLher hand, ln a local referendum, Lhe law-maklng body submlLs Lo Lhe reglsLered voLers of lLs LerrlLorlal [urlsdlcLlon, for approval or re[ecLlon, any ordlnance or resoluLlon whlch ls duly enacLed or approved by such law-maklng auLhorlLy (5oblc 8oy Mettopolltoo Aotbotlty vs. comelec, C.k. No. 125416, 5eptembet 26, 1996).
1.4 1he appllcaLlon of local lnlLlaLlves exLends Lo all sub[ecLs or maLLers whlch are wlLhln Lhe legal powers of Lhe sooqqooloos Lo enacL, whlch undoubLedly lncludes ordlnances and resoluLlons (Cotclo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 1112J0, 5eptembet J0, 1994).
*(+", ?6&+2", H(:2&3 PEA drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 76
1. 1he local speclal bodles are Lhe developmenL counclls (5ectloo 106, 1991 lCc), school boards (5ectloo 98, 1991 lCc), healLh boards (5ectloo 102, 1991 lCc), peace and order counclls (5ectloo 116, 1991 lCc), and people's law enforcemenL boards (k.A. No. 6975). eople's and non-governmenLal organlzaLlons are represenLed ln Lhese bodles.
B"%#/&%3F263 "/: ;3323#"/+&
1. Local governmenLs shall promoLe Lhe esLabllshmenL and operaLlon of people's and non-governmenLal organlzaLlons Lo become acLlve parLners ln Lhe pursulL of local auLonomy. Local governmenLs may provlde asslsLance Lo, flnanclal or oLherwlse, and may enLer lnLo parLnershlp and cooperaLlve arrangemenLs wlLh clvll socleLy groups, non-governmenLal and people's organlzaLlons (5ectloos J4 -J6, 1991 lCc).
D&+",,
1. 1he power of recall or Lhe power Lo remove a local elecLlve offlclal for loss of confldence shall be exerclsed by Lhe reglsLered voLers of an LCu Lo whlch Lhe local elecLlve offlclal sub[ecL Lo such recall belongs (5ectloo 69, 1991 lCc).
1.1 8ecall ls a mode of removal of publlc offlcer by Lhe people before Lhe end of hls/her Lerm of offlce. 1he people's prerogaLlve Lo remove a publlc offlcer ls an lncldenL of Lhelr soverelgn power and ln Lhe absence of any ConsLlLuLlonal resLralnL, Lhe power ls lmplled ln all governmenLal operaLlons. Loss of confldence as a ground for recall ls a pollLlcal quesLlon (Cotclo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 111511, Octobet 5, 199J).
1.2 1he 1-year ban refers Lo elecLlon where Lhe offlce held by Lhe local offlclal soughL Lo be recalled shall be conLesLed. 1he scheduled barangay elecLlon on May 1997 ls noL Lhe regular elecLlon conLemplaLed for purposes of compuLlng Lhe 1-year prohlblLlon for recall of munlclpal elecLlve offlclals (Iotlol vs. comelec, C.k. No. 127456, Motcb 20, 1997).
1.3 1he 1-year ban cannoL be deemed Lo apply Lo Lhe enLlre recall proceedlngs. 1he llmlLaLlons apply only Lo Lhe exerclse of Lhe power of recall whlch ls vesLed ln Lhe reglsLered voLers. So, as long as Lhe elecLlon drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 77 ls held ouLslde Lhe one-year perlod, from assumpLlon Lo offlce Lhe local offlclal soughL Lo be recalled, Lhe prellmlnary proceedlngs Lo lnlLlaLe a recall can be held even before Lhe end of Lhe flrsL year ln offlce of sald local offlclal (clooJlo vs. comelec, C.k. No. 140560, Moy 4, 2000).
1.4 A parLy aggrleved by Lhe lssuance of a Commlsslon on LlecLlon resoluLlon provldlng for Lhe schedule of acLlvlLles for Lhe recall of elecLlve offlclals should have flled, when he/she had sufflclenL Llme, a moLlon for reconslderaLlon wlLh Lhe Commlsslon pursuanL Lo Lhe rule on exhausLlon of admlnlsLraLlve remedles (Iotlol vs. comelec, C.k. No. 127456, Motcb 20, 1997).
2. under Lhe 1991 LCC, Lhere are Lwo modes of lnlLlaLlng recall: (1) popular peLlLlon by Lhe voLers, (2) resoluLlon by Lhe reparaLory 8ecall Assembly composed of elecLlve offlclals of Lhe supervlsed-lower LCu. under 8.A. no. 9244, Lhe second mode was repealed.
?&+#(%", D&6%&3&/#"#2.&3
1. 1here shall be Lhree secLoral represenLaLlves ln Lhe provlnclal, clLy and munlclpal leglslaLlve counclls. ln addlLlon Lo Lhe regular members, Lhere shall be one (1) secLoral represenLaLlve from Lhe women, one (1) from Lhe workers, and one (1) from any of Lhe followlng secLors: Lhe urban poor, lndlgenous culLural communlLles, dlsabled persons, or any oLher secLor as may be deLermlned by Lhe sooqqooloo concerned wlLhln nlneLy (90) days prlor Lo Lhe holdlng of Lhe nexL local elecLlons as may be provlded for by law (5ectloo 41, 1991 lCc).
1.1 SecLlon 9 of Lhe 1987 hlllpplne ConsLlLuLlon provldes LhaL leglslaLlve bodles of local governmenL shall have secLoral represenLaLlon as may be prescrlbed by law". 1he phrase as may be prescrlbed by law" does noL and cannoL, by lLs very wordlng, resLrlcL lLself Lo Lhe uncerLalnLy of fuLure leglslaLlon. Such lnLerpreLaLlon would defeaL Lhe very purpose of lmmedlaLely lncludlng secLoral represenLaLlves ln Lhe local law-maklng bodles. CLherwlse, ln Lhe lnLerregnum, from Lhe raLlflcaLlon of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon unLll Lhe passage of Lhe approprlaLe sLaLuLe, Lhe secLors would have no volce ln Lhe formulaLlon of leglslaLlon LhaL would dlrecLly affecL Lhelr lndlvldual members (5opooqoo vs. 5ootos, C.k. No. 8466J, Aoqost 24, 1990). drafL as of 10 november 2012 8evlewer on Local CovernmenL Law AlberLo C. Agra, ALeneo Law School 78
Environment and Energy: Environmental Aspects of Energy Production and Use with Particular Reference to New Technologies a Report of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications