Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Thomson Model or Plum Pudding Model

In 1897, J. J. Thomson debunked the famous believe of John Daltons Atomic Theory that
atom
is indivisible after he discovered the electron in his work. Thomson's notion of the electron
came from his work with a nineteenth century scientific curiosity

the cathode ray tube. For years scientists had known that if an electric current was passed
through a vacuum tube, a stream of glowing material could be seen; however, no one could
explain why. Thomson found that the mysterious glowing stream would bend toward a
positively charged electric plate. Thomson theorized, and was later proven correct, that the
stream was in fact made up of small particles, pieces of atoms that carried a negative charge.
These particles were later named electrons. After
Eugen Goldsteins 1886 discovery that atoms had positive charges, Thomson imagined that
atoms looked like pieces of raisin bread or plum pudding, a structure in which clumps of
small, negatively charged electron (the "raisins") were scattered inside a smear of positive
charges. In 1908, Ernest Rutherford, a former student of Thomson's, proved Thomson's raisin
bread structure incorrect.
Fig 1.0: J. J. Thomson Atomic Model 1 (Plum Pudding Model)
In summary
, J. J. Thomson proposed that an atom can be considered as a sphere of uniformly
di s t r i but ed pos i t i ve char ge i n whi ch t her e ar e el ect r ons di s t r i but ed
s ymmet r i cal l y. The electrons must be held by the positive charges by
electrostatic forces. The mutual repulsions between the electrons are balanced
by the force of attraction towards the centre of the sphere.



SCHRODINGER WAVE EQUATION [1926]
In 1926 Schrodinger proposed that if an electron is a wave then there should be awave
equation that describes all the behavior of the wave associated with the electron justlike the
other types of waves. On the basis of this idea, he derived an equation whichdescribes the
amplitude known as wave function of this wave.Consider an electron moving
with an angular velocity in a circle of radius r
aroundthe nucleus. The variation of displacementwith time can be represented by a
simpleharmonic wave as shown in figure. A simpleharmonic wave can be produced in a medium
by a body executing simple harmonic motion. Let be the wave function of the wave when
the particle moves from point B to A, then considering the right angled triangle AOC,

Models of the atom
It is important to realise that a lot of what we know about the structure of atoms has been
developed over a long period of time. This is often how scientific knowledge develops, with
one person building on the ideas of someone else. We are going to look at how our modern
understanding of the atom has evolved over time.
The origins of atomic theory
The idea of atoms was invented by two Greek philosophers, Democritus and Leucippus in the
fifth century BC. The Greek word oo (atom) means indivisible because they believed
that atoms could not be broken into smaller pieces.
Nowadays, we know that atoms are made up of a positively charged nucleus in the centre
surrounded by negatively charged electrons. However, in the past, before the structure of the
atom was properly understood, scientists came up with lots of different models or pictures to
describe what atoms look like.
Definition 1: Model
A model is a representation of a system in the real world. Models help us to
understand systems and their properties.
For example, an atomic model represents what the structure of an atom could look like, based
on what we know about how atoms behave. It is not necessarily a true picture of the exact
structure of an atom.
Models are often simplified. The small toy cars that you may have played with as a child are
models. They give you a good idea of what a real car looks like, but they are much smaller
and much simpler. A model cannot always be absolutely accurate and it is important that we
realise this, so that we do not build up an incorrect idea about something.
Dalton's model of the atom
John Dalton proposed that all matter is composed of very small things which he called atoms.
This was not a completely new concept as the ancient Greeks (notably Democritus) had
proposed that all matter is composed of small, indivisible (cannot be divided) objects. When
Dalton proposed his model electrons and the nucleus were unknown.

Figure 1: The atom according to Dalton.
Thomson's model of the atom
After the electron was discovered by J.J. Thomson in 1897, people realised that atoms were
made up of even smaller particles than they had previously thought. However, the atomic
nucleus had not been discovered yet and so the plum pudding model was put forward in
1904. In this model, the atom is made up of negative electrons that float in a soup of
positive charge, much like plums in a pudding or raisins in a fruit cake (Figure 2). In 1906,
Thomson was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work in this field. However, even with the
Plum Pudding Model, there was still no understanding of how these electrons in the atom
were arranged.

Figure 2: The atom according to the Plum Pudding model.
The discovery of radiation was the next step along the path to building an accurate picture of
atomic structure. In the early twentieth century, Marie and Pierre Curie, discovered that some
elements (the radioactive elements) emit particles, which are able to pass through matter in a
similar way to Xrays (read more about this in Grade 11). It was Ernest Rutherford who, in
1911, used this discovery to revise the model of the atom.
Interesting Fact:
Two other models proposed for the atom were the cubic model and the Saturnian model. In
the cubic model, the electrons were imagined to lie at the corners of a cube. In the Saturnian
model, the electrons were imagined to orbit a very big, heavy nucleus.
Rutherford's model of the atom
Rutherford carried out some experiments which led to a change in ideas around the atom. His
new model described the atom as a tiny, dense, positively charged core called a nucleus
surrounded by lighter, negatively charged electrons. Another way of thinking about this
model was that the atom was seen to be like a mini solar system where the electrons orbit the
nucleus like planets orbiting around the sun. A simplified picture of this is shown alongside.
This model is sometimes known as the planetary model of the atom.

Figure 3: Rutherford's model of the atom.
Bohr's model of the atom
There were, however, some problems with Rutherford's model: for example it could not
explain the very interesting observation that atoms only emit light at certain wavelengths or
frequencies. Niels Bohr solved this problem by proposing that the electrons could only orbit
the nucleus in certain special orbits at different energy levels around the nucleus.

Figure 4: Bohr's model of the atom.
James Chadwick
Rutherford predicted (in 1920) that another kind of particle must be present in the nucleus
along with the proton. He predicted this because if there were only positively charged protons
in the nucleus, then it should break into bits because of the repulsive forces between the like-
charged protons! To make sure that the atom stays electrically neutral, this particle would
have to be neutral itself. In 1932 James Chadwick discovered the neutron and measured its
mass.
Other models of the atom
Although the most commonly used model of the atom is the Bohr model, scientists are still
developing new and improved theories on what the atom looks like. One of the most
important contributions to atomic theory (the field of science that looks at atoms) was the
development of quantum theory. Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Born and many others have had a
role in developing quantum theory.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen