0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
47 Ansichten8 Seiten
Endorser credibility is a method frequently used in advertising to influence consumer attitudes. This study replicates the method reported in Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992) using male athletes rather than young female entertainers, and by using different products. The results indicate the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
The Impact of Celebrity Endorsers on Consumers' Product
Endorser credibility is a method frequently used in advertising to influence consumer attitudes. This study replicates the method reported in Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992) using male athletes rather than young female entertainers, and by using different products. The results indicate the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product.
Endorser credibility is a method frequently used in advertising to influence consumer attitudes. This study replicates the method reported in Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992) using male athletes rather than young female entertainers, and by using different products. The results indicate the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product.
The Impact of Celebrity Endorsers on Consumers' Product
Evaluations: A Symbolic Meaning Approach
James B. Hunt, University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Abstract
This study replicates the method reported in Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992), expanding their work by using male athletes rather than young female entertainers, and by using different products. The results indicate the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product by moving it toward the image of the endorser. However, this study does not support Langmeyer and Walker (1991), who found that regardless of the endorser, the pattern for the endorser/product combination was located closer to the pattern for the endorser than to the pattern for the product.
Introduction
Endorser credibility is a method frequently used in advertising to influence consumers' attitudes toward the ad, product evaluations, and purchase intentions. As noted by Lafferty and Goldsmith (1999), the importance of using a credible source in a company's marketing communications has been a widely researched topic for decades. Much of this research has focused on celebrity endorsers. Their use is a "ubiquitous feature of modem marketing," (McCracken, 1989), and a growing segment of the booming licensing business. It is estimated that more than ten percent of television advertising includes celebrity endorsements (Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer, 1992).
Background Literature
According to Atkin and Block (1983), there are two reasons why celebrity endorsers have gained so much popularity. First, they are traditionally viewed as being highly dynamic, having both attractive and likeable qualities. Secondly, their fame is thought to attract attention to the product. Advertisers also believe that messages delivered by well-known personalities achieve a high degree of attention and recall (Ohanian, 1991). Research has also shown that celebrity endorsements are more effective for products with high psychological or social risk (Atkin and Block, 1983).
Consumers tend to perceive the celebrity as projecting source characteristics that are then used in the evaluation of an advertisement and the product being promoted. Source characteristics involve attributes such as the familiarity of the endorser, their likeability, their similarity to the consumer, and the fit of their image with the image of the product. Source credibility, in particular, involves three dimensions: trustworthiness, expertise, and attractiveness (Baker and Churchill, 1977). These dimensions can make independent contributions to source effectiveness (Weiner and Mowen, 1985), and can induce an attitude change when they are effectively used in conjunction with a celebrity endorser. Trustworthiness
Trustworthiness is, generally considered the major dimension underlying source credibility (Friedman and Friedman, 1979). It refers to the consumer's confidence in the source for providing information in an objective and honest manner (0hanian, 1991). When the endorser is not a friend or family member, it may be difficult for the consumer to have a great deal of confidence in the endorser. If the objective of the advertisement is, for example, attitude change, this lack of confidence may result in an unsuccessful execution.
Expertise
Expertise is also considered a major dimension of source credibility. Expertise is the extent to which a communicator is perceived to be a source of "valid assertions' (Hovland, Janis, and Kelley, 1953). When an endorser possesses expertise, they have knowledge about the product, which in turn supports the claims made in the advertisement (Ohanian, 1991). Endorsers will be perceived as having the most expertise when they endorse products or services related to them. Research has shown that in persuasive communication, the endorser's perceived expertise has a positive impact on attitude change (Horai, Naccari, and Fatoullah, 1974).
Attractiveness
Physically attractive communicators are more successful in changing beliefs than are unattractive communicators (Chaiken, 1979; Dion and Berscheld, 1972). In today's society, people tend to place a heavy emphasis on attractiveness, and most advertisements feature attractive models. In a sense, the physical attractiveness of the endorser rubs off on the product, enhancing the product's image and resulting in positive attitude change (Simon, Berkowitz, and Moyer, 1970; Kahle and Homer, 1985). This points to the importance of "matching up" the image of the celebrity with the characteristics of the product. The "match up" notion suggests that the image of the product and the celebrity should come together, with the relevant attributes of the product being consistent with the characteristics of the endorser to gain positive impact with increased memorability and recall (Misra and Beatty, 1990).
Symbolic Meaning
A growing body Of literature suggests that celebrities possess "symbolic meanings" that go beyond the traditional notions of trustworthiness, expertise, and likeability. McCracken (1989) believes that celebrity endorsers embody cultural symbolic meanings and associations that they pass on to the products they endorse. Each role, event, or accomplishment in the career of the celebrity changes these meanings. The message conveyed by the total of the symbolic meanings and the image of the product converge in effective advertisements, achieving a balance between the celebrity and the product (Kamins, 1990).
Jacoby and Mazursky (1984) have examined the idea of celebrity/product balance in a retail context. They propose that when brand and retailer images become associated, an "averaging" process is activated such that the party with the more favorable image is adversely affected, while the party with the less favorable image is enhanced. Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992) have investigated the impact of celebrity endorser/product combinations using the approach developed by Jacoby and Mazursky (1984). They use identical 25-item semantic differential scales to explore the images (i.e., cultural meanings) evoked by individual celebrity endorsers and products, and then explore the impact of combining celebrity and product images. The results of their study indicate that Christie Brinkley and Madonna are perceived as having vastly different images, and the products they may endorse (bath towels, jeans, VCRs) tend to be perceived as possessing attributes similar to the respective endorser.
Purpose
The broad focus of this study is to investigate how celebrity endorsers affect consumer perceptions of products, given McCracken's (1989) notion that celebrities bring their symbolic meanings to the endorsement process. More specifically, the study replicates the method reported in Langrneyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langmeyer (1992), expanding their work by using male athletes rather than young female entertainers, and by using two different products. This study examines the images evoked by individual celebrity endorsers and products, and explores the impact of combining celebrity and product images.
Method
The study involves asking respondents to evaluate a celebrity endorser, a product, and a combination of the celebrity and the product. One hundred and seventeen (117) undergraduate business students, 66 male and 51 female, participated in the project. The experiment was a 2 x 3 full factorial design, using two celebrities and three products, resulting in six versions of the questionnaire. The respondents were randomly assigned to one of the six versions. Each questionnaire was divided into three parts. Part I asked respondents to evaluate a celebrity, Michael Jordan or Deion Sanders. Part 2 asked respondents to evaluate one of three products: a CD player, bed sheets, or jeans. Part 3 asked respondents to evaluate the product in Part 2 when advertised by the celebrity in Part 1.
In each part of the questionnaire there was a set of 25 identical descriptive semantic differential pairs the respondent used to rate the celebrities and products. These 25 pairs were taken from Langmeyer and Walker (1991) and Walker, Langmeyer, and Langineyer (1992), with some modifications to better fit the male athlete celebrities studied here. Each pair was evaluated on a seven-point scale with the endpoints representing an extremely descriptive characteristic. The two celebrities were chosen based on their image differences. They are both athletes, but their images are quite different. Deion Sanders' cocky, brash image contrasts Michael Jordan's subdued, more gentlemanly persona. This difference in image allows for the study of contrasting endorsers and the effect they can have on product meaning.
The three products being used in this study all represent a distinct product category. The CD player represents a technical product with high information needs. Bed sheets represent a commodity type product, and jeans represent a high-image product that has been frequently endorsed.
Results and Discussion
The results show the means for the endorsers (Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders), the products (CD player, bed sheets, jeans), and the endorser/product combinations. Each of these is rated separately using the 25 image dimensions. The results may be easier to visualize in terms of a line plot or scatter plot In all three, the patterns for Michael Jordan would be somewhat "tighter" than the patterns for Deion Sanders. The points would tend to be closer together. This suggests a closer correspondence, or better match, between Michael Jordan and the products being endorsed than between Deion Sanders and the endorsed products. This difference between Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders, however, is not as pronounced as the difference found by Langmeyer and Walker (1991) regarding Madonna and Christie Brinkley. It is also apparent that, when judged alone, the general patterns for Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders are a bit different. Though in a line plot they would not differ dramatically in overall appearance, a closer inspection of the results reveals separation on a number of dimensions.
Langmeyer and Walker (1991) found that regardless of the endorser, the pattern for the endorser/product combination was located closer to the pattern for the endorser than to the pattern for the product. The results of the present study do not confirm this finding. The pattern for the endorser/product combination is located closer to the pattern of the endorser for Deion Sanders, but not in the case of Michael Jordan. This suggests that evaluation of the endorser may, for some endorsers, have a greater impact on the combination than the evaluation of the product. Nevertheless, the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product by moving it toward the image of the endorser.
The Table shows the three sets of results for a CD player. Results for sheets and jeans are discussed below, but due to space considerations are not indicated in the Table. Comparing the evaluations for Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders when judged alone, the two are perceived very differently. Significant differences are observed on 19 of the 25 dimensions based on test results. Compared to Deion Sanders, Michael Jordan is perceived as more attractive, higher quality, natural, safe, more reliable, pleasant, higher class, less intense, less modem, more liked, less rugged, less cocky, nice, less extroverted, sophisticated, serious, older, more widely appealing, and as having more integrity. They are both perceived as unusual, hard, masculine, not sexy, useful and luxurious.
As one would expect, t-test results indicate that CD players are perceived essentially the same by both groups of respondents. Differences in evaluations are not significant for 21 of the 25 dimensions. This finding helps confirm that the respondents answered the questionnaire seriously and understood the task, and that the differences found between endorsers and between endorser/product combinations do in fact have practical significance.
Table. The Impact of Combining Endorser and Product Images: CD Player Michael Jordan Deion Sanders Endorser Product Combined Endorser Product Combined Scale x x x x x x
*Significant at p-value.10 compared to same dimension for same variable for Deion Sanders (same test as Langmeyer & Walker, 199 1; Walker, Langmeyer, & Langmeyer, 1992)
When Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders endorse a CD player, the product takes on some of the descriptive and symbolic properties belonging to the endorser. For example, Deion Sanders' CD player is cocky, nasty, and less serious. Surprisingly, Michael Jordan's CD player is perceived as harder than Deion's, but this may be due to the respondents in the Jordan/CD group having initially rated CD players as hard. No significant differences are observed on the other dimensions.
The results for bed sheets are discussed next. When endorsers are judged alone, the results reveal, as they did for the CD player respondents, very different perceived images for Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders. These image differences very closely mirror those observed by the CD player group. The t-tests indicate significant differences on 22 of the 25 dimensions. The two groups that evaluated bed sheets significantly differ on 7 of the 25 product dimensions, with 6 of the 7 differences a matter of degree, not description. When sheets are endorsed by Michael Jordan or Deion Sanders, significant differences result on 9 of the 25 dimensions. Deion Sander's sheets are seen as more unusual, less safe, less reliable, less pleasant, more intense, less delicate, more cocky, nasty, and not having as wide of an appeal. These dimensions seem to be fairly representative of the contrast between the two endorsers.
As for the evaluation results for jeans, different images are again perceived for Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders. The tests indicate significant differences on 16 of the 25 dimensions. The results are consistent with the previous discussion, i.e., Michael Jordan is seen as being more likeable and less cocky. The image of jeans without endorsers is quite similar for both groups. On only 5 of the 25 dimensions are there significant differences. A very interesting effect occurs when jeans are paired with the endorsers. Significant differences result on 15 of the 25 dimensions. Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders appear to have more of an impact on a product that is high image, and has been previously endorsed by celebrities. This finding is in sharp contrast to Langmeyer and Walker (1991), who found Madonna and Christie Brinkley to have only moderate effect on the image of jeans. In this study, Michael Jordan's jeans are seen as soft, natural, safer, more reliable, pleasant, higher class, less in tense, less modem, more useful, likeable, less cocky, nice, more sophisticated, having a wider appeal, and having integrity.
Conclusion
Celebrities can be very effective in the endorsement of products, however, they can also be dangerous. The advantages of using a celebrity are that they can increase attention to and memorability of the ad and product, enhance credibility of the message, and imbue a product with positive image characteristics. The disadvantage, or danger, is that if a celebrity has a negative image, it can be passed on to the product being endorsed. As shown in this study, bed sheets are perceived as ordinary, safe, reliable, and delicate. When advertised by Deion Sanders, however, bed sheets are perceived as unusual, risky, less reliable, and somewhat rugged. This suggests that great care should be taken in selecting a celebrity endorser. The celebrity's image must be taken into account.
The results of this study indicate that the perception of the endorser does affect the image of the product by moving it toward the image of the endorser. However, this study does not support Langmeyer and Walker (1991), who found that regardless of the endorser, the pattern for the endorser/product combination was located closer to the pattern for the endorser than to the pattern for the product. The results of the present study indicate that the pattern for the endorser/product combination is located closer to the pattern for the endorser for Deion Sanders, but not in the case of Michael Jordan. This suggests that evaluation of the endorser may, for some endorsers, have a greater impact on the combination than the evaluation of the product. Michael Jordan and Deion Sanders appear to have more of an impact on a product that is high image, and has been previously endorsed by celebrities. This finding is in sharp contrast to Langmeyer and Walker (1991), who found Madonna and Christie Brinkley to have only moderate effect on the image of jeans.
Whether celebrities are good for the endorsement of products is a question that many advertisers face. The answer is, "It depends on the endorser and the product." Future research needs to continue focusing on a variety of product categories and a variety of types of endorsers (e.g., actors, athletes, entertainers). Different types of audiences should also be studied to help advertisers better understand the roles of celebrity image, product characteristics, and consumer profile on product evaluation.
References
Atkin, Charles, and Block, Martin, Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research 23 (February/March 1983): 57-6 1.
Baker, Michael J., and Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr., The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (1977): 538-555.
Chaiken, Shelly, Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (August 1979):1387-1397.
Dion, Karen K., and Berscheid, Ellen, What Is Beautiful Is Good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (December 1972): 285-290.
Friedman, Hershey H., and Friedman, Linda, Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type. Journal of Advertising Research 19 (October 1979): 63 -7 1.
Horai, J.M., Naccari, N., and Fatoullah, E., Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking. Sociometry 37 (no. 4, 1974): 601-606.
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., and Kelley, H.H., Communication and Persuasion, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1953.
Kahle, L.R., and Homer, P.M., Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 11 (1985): 954-961.
Kamins, Michael A., An investigation into the Match-Up Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep. Journal of Advertising 19 (1990): 4-13.
Lafferty, Barbara A., and Goldsmith, Ronald E., Corporate Credibility's Role in Consumers' Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad. Journal of Business Research 44 (February 1999): 109-116.
Langrneyer, Lynn, and Walker, Mary, Assessing the Effects of Celebrity Endorsers: Preliminary Findings. Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (1991): 32-43.
McCracken, Grant, Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December 1989): 310-32 1.
Misra, Shekhar, and Beatty, Sharon, Celebrity Spokesperson and Brand Congruence. Journal of Business Research 21 (1990): 159-173.
Ohanian, Roobina, Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons' Perceived Image on Consumers' Intention to Purchase. Journal of Advertising Research (February/March 1991): 46-53.
Simon, Herbert W., Berkowitz, Nancy N_and Moyer, John, Similarity, Credibility, and Attitude Change: A Review and a Theory. Psychological Bulletin 73 (January 1970): 1-16.
Walker, Mary, Langmeyer, Lynn, and Langmeyer, Daniel, Celebrity Endorsers: Do You Get What You Pay For? Journal ofServices Marketing 6 (Fall 1992): 3 5-45.
Welffier, J., and Mowen, J., The Impact of Product Recalls on Consumer Perceptions. Journal of the Society of Consumer Affairs Professionals in Business 14'(1985): 18-2 1.