0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
21 Ansichten2 Seiten
This document discusses equations and factors for determining dynamic seismic forces on structures storing liquids. It presents general equations that modify typical building code equations by accounting for effective masses of tank walls and roofs, as well as impulsive and convective liquid masses. The impulsive and convective components are combined using the square root of the sum of the squares method. Soil profile coefficients and inelastic response spectra scaled by response modification factors are also considered in the general equations.
This document discusses equations and factors for determining dynamic seismic forces on structures storing liquids. It presents general equations that modify typical building code equations by accounting for effective masses of tank walls and roofs, as well as impulsive and convective liquid masses. The impulsive and convective components are combined using the square root of the sum of the squares method. Soil profile coefficients and inelastic response spectra scaled by response modification factors are also considered in the general equations.
This document discusses equations and factors for determining dynamic seismic forces on structures storing liquids. It presents general equations that modify typical building code equations by accounting for effective masses of tank walls and roofs, as well as impulsive and convective liquid masses. The impulsive and convective components are combined using the square root of the sum of the squares method. Soil profile coefficients and inelastic response spectra scaled by response modification factors are also considered in the general equations.
designed for the following dynamic forces in addition to
the static pressures: (a) inertia forces Pw and Pr ; (b) hydrodynamic impulsive pressure Pi from the contained liquid; (c) hydrodynamic convective pressure Pc from the contained liquid; (d) dynamic earth pressure from saturated and unsaturated soils against the buried portion of the wall; and (e) the effects of vertical acceleration. 4.1.1Dynamic lateral forces The dynamic lateral forces above the base shall be determined as follows: (4-1) (4-1a) (4-2) (4-3) (4-4) Where applicable, the lateral forces due to the dynamic earth and ground water pressures against the buried portion of the walls shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 8. 4.1.2Total base shear, general equation The base shear due to seismic forces applied at the bottom of the tank wall shall be determined by the following equation: (4-5) Pw ZSICi eWw Rwi = ------------ Pw ZSICi eWw Rwi = -------------- Pr ZSICi Wr Rwi = --------- Pi ZSICi Wi Rwi = --------- Pc ZSICc Wc Rwc = ------------ V Pi + Pw + Pr2 Pc = + 2 R4.1Earthquake pressures above base The general equation for the total base shear normally encountered in the earthquake-design sections of governing building codes is modified in Eq. (4-1) through (4-4) by replacing the term W with the four effective masses: the effective mass of the tank wall, eWw, and roof, Wr; the impulsive component of the liquid mass Wi; and the convective component Wc. Because the impulsive and convective components are not in phase with each other, normal practice is to combine them using the square root of the sum of the squares method (Eq. (4-5)). The general equation for base shear is also modified in Eq. (4-1) through (4-4) by the soil profile coefficient S in accordance FACULTAD DE ING. CIVIL INSTALACIONES ESPECIALES EN EDIFICIOS
Callo Palomino Roger
with Table 4(b). The imposed ground motion is represented by an elastic response spectrum that is either derived from an actual earthquake record for the site, or is constructed by analogy to sites with known soil and seismic characteristics. The profile of the response spectrum is defined by the product ZC. Factor Z (Table 4(a)) represents the maximum effective peak ground acceleration for the site, while C is a perioddependent spectral-amplification factor. In Eq. (4-1) to (4-4) factor C is represented by Ci and Cc, corresponding to the responses of the impulsive and convective components, respectively. Factor I provides a means for the engineer to increase the factor of safety for the categories of structures described in Table 4(c). (See also Reference 1, Section R21.2.1.7). The response modification factors Rwc and Rwi reduce the elastic response spectrum to account for the structures ductility, energy-dissipating properties, and redundancy (Reference 1, Section R21.2.1). The resulting inelastic response spectrum is represented by ZI SC/Rw. V ZI C Rw = ---------- W CHAPTER 4ANTECEDENTES La mayor parte de normativas ssmicas prescriben un espectro de diseo inelstico, el mismo que se obtiene a partir del espectro de diseo elstico dividido para el factor de reduccin de las fuerzas ssmicas. Este factor est definido en forma muy general para una determinada tipologa estructural y el desconocimiento de su origen o de las implicaciones que asume el proyectista estructural cuando selecciona un determinado valor puede llevar a subestimar las fuerzas ssmicas o a sobreestimarlas (Daza, 2003). Normalmente las normativas ssmicas presentan el valor mximo recomendado del factor R para un determinado nivel de diseo ssmico y este valor tambin est asociado al tipo de espectro que estipula la norma. Por ejemplo, en la Tabla 1 se indican los valores mximos recomendados por las normativas de Per (E-030, 2006), Ecuador (CEC-2000, 2000), Colombia (NSR-98, 1998) y Venezuela (COVENIN 1756-98, 2001), para estructuras de hormign armado constituidas por vigas y columnas, sin muros de corte. En las combinaciones de carga de las normas de Per, Colombia y Venezuela no se mayora el estado de carga ssmico pero en la de Ecuador, s se mayora el estado de cargas debido a sismo. En efecto, las combinaciones de carga del Cdigo Ecuatoriano de la Construccin, CEC-2000, son: U D E