0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
48 Ansichten10 Seiten
Spontaneous ignition delay times measured using gaseous fuels and fuel vapors. Ignition delay times expressed in terms of mixture temperature, fuel concentration, and oxygen concentration.
Spontaneous ignition delay times measured using gaseous fuels and fuel vapors. Ignition delay times expressed in terms of mixture temperature, fuel concentration, and oxygen concentration.
Spontaneous ignition delay times measured using gaseous fuels and fuel vapors. Ignition delay times expressed in terms of mixture temperature, fuel concentration, and oxygen concentration.
Spont aneous Igni ti on Characteristics of Gaseous Hydrocarbon- Ai r
Mixtures G. FREEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE The Combustion Laboratory, Thermal Sciences and Propulsion Center, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Measurements of spontaneous ignition delay time are conducted using gaseous fuels and fuel vapors at normal atmospheric pressure. The apparatus comprises a test section which is constructed from several lengths of 30 mm diameter stainless steel tubing to form a maximum total length of 2.2 m. The method employed to determine ignition delay times is to establish certain predetermined values of velocity and equivalence ratio within the test section and then gradually increase the temperature of the mixture until autoignition occurs. All measurements are taken, at various levels of velocity, with the flame located a few centimeters downstream of the end of the test section, where it assumes a conical form with the apex pointing upstream. The results show that ignition delay time can be expressed in terms of mixture temperature, fuel concentration, and oxygen concentration, by the equation r~xexp[E/RTm] [Fuel]'[Oxygen] ~, For the fuels employed in this study, which include propane, aviation kerosine, and n-heptane, the results show that E is fairly close to 40,000 kcal/kg mol. Ignition delay times are found to be only slightly dependent on fuel concentration, but strongly dependent on oxygen concentration. For example, for propane n = - 0.59, while for kerosine n = -0. 65. I NTRODUCTI ON Spont aneous i gni t i on is a process whereby a combust i bl e mi xt ure undergoes chemi cal reac- t i on l eadi ng to the rapid evol ut i on of heat in the absence of any concent rat ed source of i gni t i on such as a flame or spark. In some practical combust i on devi ces, such as the l ean premi x/ prevapori ze combust or which is now bei ng act i vel y devel oped for advanced aircraft gas t urbi ne engi nes, spont aneous i gni t i on must be avoi ded at all costs, since it coul d damage combust or component s and produce unaccep- t abl y high levels of pol l ut ant emi ssi ons [1, 2]. Copyright 1984 by The Combustion Institute Published by Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 On the other hand, spont aneous i gni t i on is somet i mes relied upon to provi de the mai n source of i gni t i on, as in the compr essi on i gni - tion engi ne. Spont aneous i gni t i on delay may be defi ned as the t i me i nt erval bet ween the creat i on of a combust i bl e mi xt ure, say by i nj ect i ng fuel into air at high t emperat ure, and the onset of flame. In vi ew of t hei r pract i cal i mport ance, measure- ment s of i gni t i on delay t i mes have been con- duct ed for many fuels over wide ranges of ambi ent condi t i ons and in a vari et y of test vehi cl es, i ncl udi ng const ant vol ume bombs, r api d- compr essi on machi nes, reci procat i ng en- 0010-2180/84/$03.00 154 G. FREEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE gines, shock tubes, and cont i nuous flow devi ces [ 3- 14] . The test met hods empl oyed and the results obt ai ned are descri bed in revi ews by Mullins [3] and, mor e recent l y, by Spadaccini and Te Vel de [5]. Al t hough the subject of spont aneous ignition of liquid fuels has recei ved consi derabl e atten- tion in the past, the role of fuel evaporat i on in the overal l spont aneous ignition process is still uncl ear. It was deci ded, t her ef or e, to conduct a series of exper i ment s using onl y gaseous or vapor i zed fuels, somet i mes with the injection of additional oxygen into the fl owi ng air stream, in or der to obtain mor e accurat e data on chemi cal del ay times under condi t i ons where the effect s of fuel evapor at i on are excl uded. EXPERI MENTAL The apparat us empl oyed in the measurement of spont aneous ignition del ay time is shown sche- mat i cal l y in Fig. 1. Ai r is supplied from a high pressure bl ower, the ai r flow rate being con- t rol l ed by an el ect ri cal l y activated pintle valve fitted into the bl ower inlet duct. Ai r flow rates are cal cul at ed from the dynami c pressure mea- sured in the t hroat of a bel l -mout h ori fi ce t hrough which inlet air enters the bl ower. Typi cal vel oci t es in the test section range f r om 10 to 40 m/s. Two separate heat ers are empl oyed to raise the t emperat ure of the incoming air. A preheat section contains t wo heat ers which consist of coiled ni -chrome resistance wi re wound heli- cally around four cerami c support tubes. Each of these preheat ers operat es at 3. 5 kW, and can be t urned on or of f i ndependent l y of the main heater. The main air heat er consists of t hree hai rpi n-formed, i ncal l oy-sheat hed, " c a l - r o d " heating el ement s. These el ement s have a maxi- mum sheath t emperat ure of 1150K and a maxi- mum input power of 15 kW. Feedback pr opor - tional cont rol is used on the main heater. Both heating sections are heavi l y insulated. The fuel i nj ect or desi gned for. t he experi ment s on gaseous fuels and fuel vapors is illustrated in Fig. 2. For ease of manufact ure and assembl y, and to ensure structural i nt egri t y, a square tube mat ri x was const ruct ed to provi de the best distribution of holes as dictated by the round cross section of the pipe. The location of each of the 25 fuel injection points was det ermi ned by dividing the cross-sect i onal area of the pipe into 25 sections of equal area and locating an injection point as cl ose as possible to the cent er of each section. The obj ect i ve was to achi eve E E Preheater - - . . ~ 0 Blower FN2/02 ~ System Fi g. 1. S c h e ma t i c d i a g r a m o f t e s t r i g. ~ S Fuel ystem Workino Section SPONTANEOUS IGNITION CHARACTERISTICS 155 ! i i : i i ! Fig. 2. Fuel injector. rapid mi xi ng of fuel and air and to attain a uni f or m mi xt ure strength in the fuel / ai r mi xt ure ent eri ng the test section. The fuel del i very syst em for vapori zed fuels is illustrated in Fig. 3. Fuel is pumped f r om a r eser voi r to the fuel vapor i zer / heat er in the test cell. The liquid fuel -fl ow rate is moni t ored using a r ot amet er and is regulated by means of a t hrot t l e val ve. A back pressure val ve is installed at the vapor i zer exit to el i mi nat e the t endency of the vapor i zed fuel flow to surge due to small pressure fluctuations in the vapor i zer . Si nce the vapor i zer does not respond well to flow tran- sients, the fuel cut of f val ve (located j ust up- stream of the injector) is equi pped with an exhaust line to allow cont i nuous fuel fl ow, as well as visual det ermi nat i on of compl et e vapor- ization. The test section consists of a single length of drawn stainless steel tubing, having an internal di amet er of 6. 22 cm. Vari ous lengths of tubing are available and can be j oi ned t oget her or i nt erchanged to vary the length of the test section. Each segment is j acket ed by a thick l ayer of insulating material to mi ni mi ze the axial t emperat ure gradi ent in the fl owi ng mi xt ure. The test section is i nst rument ed with four shielded, st agnat i on-t ype t her mocoupl es, lo- cated along the axis of the tube. The axial locations of the four t hermocoupl es are as follows: 1, at the fuel injection plane; 2, 18 cm downst ream of the fuel injection plane; 3, hal fway down the test section; and 4, at the end of the test section. Ther mocoupl es 3 and 4 are wi t hdrawn when ignition del ay times are being measured. Test Procedure The experi ment al pr ocedur e devel oped to det er- mine ignition del ay times is as follows. Initially ~ . ~ . ~Sol enot d Fuel Tank ~ J PI Throttl e Valve Flow Meter Electric Fuel Vaporizer ~Pump i_1 Back Pressure ' Valve ~. ~ Diverter Exhouet ~ ~ Solenoid ~ Injector Fig. 3. Fuel delivery system for liquid fuels. 156 G. FREEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE fl ow condi t i ons are set at pr edet er mi ned values of vel oci t y, t emperat ure, and equi val ence ratio, and the mi xt ure t emperat ure is then slowly i ncreased. The onset of spont aneous ignition is mani fest ed as a cl earl y visible cool flame, accompani ed by the odor of al dehydes in the exhaust gases. (Mullins report ed this same phenomenon [3]. ) Spont aneous ignition first appears at a distance of 30- 50 cm downst ream of the exit of the test section as intermittent flashes of flame. As the mi xt ure t emperat ure cont i nues to i ncrease, the fl ame becomes stable and its l ocat i on moves sl owl y upst ream. The fl ame assumes the shape of a cone, with its apex pointing upst ream, and has an attached fl ame brush ext endi ng downst ream. The mix- t ure t emper at ur e is al l owed to increase until the tip of the fl ame is located near the exit of the test section. At this point the inlet ai r t emperat ure and the mi xt ure t emperat ure at one or more axial l ocat i ons are recorded. Fuel flow is abruptly t ermi nat ed, and t emperat ures are again recorded at vari ous axial locations in the test section. The del ay time is then obtained as the length of the test section di vi ded by the average vel oci t y in the test section. The initial mi xt ure t emperat ure, Tm, cannot be measured di rect l y because mixing takes a small, but finite length, so some ot her met hod of det ermi ni ng the initial t emperat ure must be empl oyed. The met hod that was chosen is to use a t emperat ure measured at a distance down- stream of the fuel -i nj ect i on plane where the results of detailed t emperat ure surveys showed that mixing is j ust compl et e. Thi s t emperat ure is then ext rapol at ed back to obtain the true initial value of Tin, using as a baseline the axial t emperat ure profi l e as measured at several sta- tions along the test section with the fuel t urned off. The pr ocedur e is illustrated in Fig. 4, which shows that the initial value of Tm is det ermi ned by fol l owi ng the baseline t emperat ure profi l e until it passes t hrough Tref. Tm is then taken as the t emperat ure where the shifted profi l e inter- sects the t emperat ure axis. I f the test section were perfect l y insulated, this pr ocedur e would be superfl uous because Tm would be equal to Tref. However , as a finite heat loss occurs, despite the thick l ayer of ext ernal insulation, the above pr ocedur e is necessary and is consi dered sat i sfact ory. One drawback to this met hod is that the t emperat ure profi l e of the reacting mi xt ure is not exact l y the same as that for air onl y. By plotting the actual mi xt ure t emperat ure profi l e and subtracting from it the " a i r - o n l y " profi l e, a graph is obt ai ned depi ct i ng the t emperat ure size due to react i on, as shown in Fig. 5. To mi ni mi ze er r or s due to this effect it is necessary to keep ,X're f small, although it must be large enough to T t Tref ~ ' R e o c t i n g " ~ . ~ . Mixture " ~ - - , . I I 0 Xre f L D O W N S T R E A M D I S T A N C E Fig. 4. Graphs illustrating method of det ermi ni ng initial mixture temperature. SPONTANEOUS IGNITION CHARACTERISTICS 157 IO25 T,K ' ~ I00( 975 t I I I I 1 l 3 0 - 0 25 5 75 x/L F i g . 5 . G r a p h s i l l u s t r a t i n g p r e f l a m e t e m p e r a t u r e r i s e a s a f u n c t i o n o f a x i a l d i s t a n c e . ensure that the t emperat ure measurement car- ried out at x,ef is downst ream of the mixing regi on. It would be desi rabl e to measure the axial t emper at ur e profi l e for each data point, but this is i mpract i cal due to the probl ems that woul d arise f r om insertion of the t her mocoupl e into the fl owi ng mi xt ure. Insert i on of a t hermo- coupl e at the upst ream end of the worki ng sect i on would affect the f uel - ai r mixing proc- ess, while its presence furt her downst ream coul d easily induce premat ure autoignition of the mi xt ure. In or der to det ermi ne whet her the presence of the fl ame front can influence ignition del ay t i mes by suppl yi ng heat or active species to the i ncomi ng fresh mi xt ure, a ni t rogen quench syst em was installed. This system includes a solenoid val ve which can be opened and closed ver y rapidly to inject a transient flow of cold ni t rogen gas into the test section. Inj ect i on of ni t rogen causes the autoignition flame to vanish, but when the ni t rogen flow is abruptly termi- nated, the fl ame reappears instantly at its origi- nal l ocat i on. Thi s suggests that the presence of the fl ame has no di scerni bl e ef f ect on ignition del ay times, whi ch is consi st ent with the obser- vations of Spadaccini [9]. Al t hough the fl ame position tends to remai n fairly const ant , it occasi onal l y leaps forward a few cent i met ers and t hen, almost instantane- ousl y, returns to its original position. This phenomenon was also noticed by Mullins [3], who at t ri but ed it to inadequate mixing of fuel and air, resulting in pocket s of rich mi xt ure in the flow approachi ng the flame. Thi s expl ana- tion is consi dered unsat i sfact ory, at least in its application to the present i nvest i gat i on, part l y because the results of many det ai l ed t emper at ur e surveys have shown that mixing is compl et e well upst ream of the autoignition fl ame, and also because it is general l y found that ignition del ay times are fairly insensitive to vari at i ons in fuel / air ratio. No at t empt has been made to study this phenomenon because it onl y occurs duri ng the phase when the mi xt ure t emper at ur e i s being slowly raised in or der to coax the autoignition flame t oward the exit of the test section. Cl os e to the test section the fl ame position usually remains quite st eady, so that measurement s of ignition del ay time can be made wi t h good accuracy. RESULTS Fr om global react i on rate consi derat i ons the chemi cal ignition del ay time can be expressed as to: exp( E/ R Tm) [Fuel] "[Oxygen] , , ( l ) 158 G. FREEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE ~, I 0 z E >,.- _1 g z~ / PROPANE + ArR ~ = 0 5 0 L ENGT H = t 2 2 m z~ L E N GT H = 9 2 rn I~ L E N G T H : 5 3 m " ~ I 0 ~ 4 0 I I I I I 9 6 0 9 I 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 . 0 4 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 5 ( I 0 0 0 / T r n , I / K Fig. 6. Spontaneous ignition delay times for propane-air mixtures. wher e z = ignition del ay t i me (ms), Tm = initial mi xt ure t emper at ur e (K), E = gl obal act i vat i on ener gy (kcal / kg mol ), R = uni versal gas const ant (kcal / kg mol K), [Fuel] --- fuel concent r at i on, [Oxygen] = oxygen concent rat i on. The f or m of Eq. (1) suggest s that a pl ot of In r versus l/Tm shoul d yi el d a st rai ght line with a posi t i ve sl ope, and this is borne out by the results shown pl ot t ed in Fig. 6 for pr opane- ai r mi xt ur es at a const ant equi val ence ratio of 0. 5. The line di spl ayed in this fi gure is drawn t hrough t hree sets of dat a poi nt s, cor r espondi ng to t hree di fferent lengths of test sect i on. The val ue of act i vat i on ener gy E cal cul at ed f r om the sl ope of this line is 38, 200 kcal / kg mol . It is of i nt erest to obser ve that all the data poi nt s lie in cl ose pr oxi mi t y to the line drawn in Fig. 6. Thi s is in mar ked cont rast with the resul t s of a pr evi ous i nvest i gat i on, wher e it was found that ignition del ay t i me was ver y depen- dent on the length of the test section empl oyed [15]. Thi s pr obl em was at t ri but ed to excessi ve heat l oss f r om the duct walls and was over come ef f ect i vel y by i ncreasi ng the internal di amet er f r om 2. 54 to 6. 22 cm and by appl yi ng a thick l ayer of i nsul at i ng mat eri al to the out er pi pe wall. The results obt ai ned using mi xt ures of vapor - ized kerosi ne with ai r are shown in Fig. 7. The st rai ght line dr awn t hrough the dat a poi nt s in this fi gure cor r esponds to a val ue for E of 40, 900 kcal / kg mol . The equi val ence ratio was vari ed over a range f r om 0. 2 to 0. 8. For pr opane the results showed that the equi val ence rat i o has an al most negl i gi - ble effect on r, al t hough an i ncrease in the equi val ence rat i o tends to pr oduce a " s t r o n g e r " tail fl ame. Equi val ence rat i os hi gher t han 0. 8 coul d not be us ed due to pr obl ems of fl ashback. It was found that as the aut oi gni t i on f l ame l ocat ed downst r eam of the test sect i on was SPONTANEOUS IGNITION CHARACTERISTICS 159 O O i 0 2 J JET A + AIR ~ 0 5 0 L E N G T H : I 2 2 r n z~ L E N G T H = 9 2 m 0 L E N G T H : 5 3 r n I 0 ; / 9 ~ I t , I I , , 9 8 0 I 0 0 0 1 . 0 2 0 1 0 4 . 0 1 0 , 6 0 1 0 8 0 I O 0 0 / T m , I / K Fi g. 7. S p o n t a n e o u s i g n i t i o n d e l a y t i me s f or k e r o s i n e - a i r mi x t u r e s . brought slowly upst ream by gradually increas- ing the mi xt ure t emperat ure, it would suddenly flash upst ream and stabilize on the fuel i nj ect or, t hereby obscuri ng any results and i ncurri ng risk of damage to the injector. Mi xt ures of vapori zed n-hept ane and air also exhi bi t ed onl y a slight dependence of ignition del ay time on equi val ence ratio. Analysis of the results showed that r ~ [Fuel] -0.23 The results obt ai ned for mi xt ures in air of propane, vapori zed n-heptane, and vapori zed Jet A are shown in Fig. 8. The equi val ence ratio is 0. 5 in all cases. Fr om inspection of this figure it is apparent that all t hree lines run roughl y parallel to each ot her, t hereby indicating that all t hree fuels have about the same value of activa- tion energy. Mor eover , it is also cl ear that ignition del ay times for propane are appreci abl y l onger than those for Jet A. Fi gures 9 and 10 show for propane and vapori zed kerosi ne, respect i vel y, the effect of replacing some of the ni t rogen in the ai r by oxygen, while maintaining the fuel concent ra- tion constant. Analysis of the results shows that for propane r ~ [Oxygen]-0. 59, while for kero- sine r c t [Oxygen] -'65 In Fig. 1 1 the experi ment al data obt ai ned in the present i nvest i gat i on for pr opane- ai r and Jet A- ai r mi xt ures are pl ot t ed, for the purpose of compari son, al ongsi de the results of previ ous workers as compi l ed by Chi appet t a and McVey [6]. It is of interest to note that the results for Jet A (kerosine) show striking agr eement with those of Mullins [3], who also conduct ed his experi - ments at normal at mospheri c pressure. Equal l y not ewort hy is the cl ose consi st ency bet ween the propane data obt ai ned by Lezber g [14] and the results of the present experi ment s. CONCLUS I ONS Fr om the r es ul t s of experi ment s conduct ed at at mospheri c pressure on the i nfl uence of mix- ture t emper at ur e on the spont aneous ignition del ay times of mi xt ures with air of propane, n- 160 G. F REEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE J PROPA FUEL+ AIR =05 / 10940 9 ; 0 9 ; 0 I ' I 0 0 0 1020 1040 I ~ 1080 I O00/ Tm, I / K Fi g . 8. C o m p a r i s o n o f i g n i t i o n d e l a y t i mes ~ r v a r i o u s ~ e l - a i r mi x t u r e s . .I i 0 ~ 1 0 ,!4 0 PROPANE VARIED0 2 CONCENTRATION FUEL CONCENTRATION=2.1% 9 0 9 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 I O00/ Tm, I l K i I I 1. 020 ).040 1 . 0 6 0 " 1. 080 Fi g. 9. Gr aphs i l l ust rat i ng i nf l uence of oxygen concent r at i on on i gni t i on del ay t i mes. SPONTANEOUS I GNI TI ON CHARACTERI STI CS 161 o 10 2 /// 1 6 % / 21* J E T - A VARIED 0 2 CONCENTRATION FUEL CONCENTRATION=21% ' 0' 940 9Lo 9~o ' , , i 1000 1020 1.040 1 0 6 0 1 0 8 0 I 0 0 0 / T i n , I / K Fi g. 10. Gr a phs i l l ust r at i ng i nf l uence of oxyge n concent r at i on on i gni t i on del ay t i mes, o IOOC II d b i / E I propone~\ Jel A h I0 ~ Ri F--JETFUEL A No2 DIESEL 9 JP 4 1 3 N o 2 DIESEL I0 I AVTUR JP 4 g 1 2 KEROSINE h I0 AVTAG j 3 K E R O S I N E k ~4 PROPANE ' ' . . . . . . . " , ~ , ' , ~ ' ~ ' 2 ' ~ ' 2 4 4 6 8 I0 I ~ 14 l I T m XlO 4, K - I Fi g. 1 1. Compa r i s on of pr es ent dat a wi t h r es ul t s of pr e- vi ous wor ker s as compi l ed by Chi appet t a and McVey [6]. hept ane vapor , and kerosi ne vapor , the fol l ow- ing concl usi ons are drawn. 1. Igni t i on delay t i mes can be expr essed in t er ms of mi xt ure t emper at ur e, fuel concen- t rat i on, and oxygen concent r at i on, by the equat i on ro~exp[E/ R Tin] [ Fuel ] " [ Oxygen] " . 2. For the fuels empl oyed in this study the val ue of E is fai rl y cl ose to 40, 000 kcal / kg mol . For exampl e, for pr opane E --- 38, 200 kcal / kg mol , whi l e for kerosi ne E = 40, 900 kcal / kg mol . 3. Over the range of equi val ence rat i os f r om 0. 2 to 0. 8 the dependence of i gni t i on del ay t i me on fuel concent rat i on is quite smal l , i . e. , m = 0. Of the fuel s exami ned the st rongest dependence on fuel concent r at i on is exhi bi t ed by n- hept ane, for whi ch m = - 0 . 2 3 . 4. Igni t i on del ay t i mes are st rongl y dependent on oxygen concent rat i on. For pr opane n = - 0 . 5 9 , while for kerosi ne n = - 0 . 6 5 . 162 G. FREEMAN and A. H. LEFEBVRE . The experimental data obtained in the present investigation for propane-air and kerosine-air mixtures are remarkably con- sistent with the results of previous studies by Lezberg and Mullins, respectively. RE F E RE NCE S 1. Lean, Premi xed/ Prevapori zed Combustion, Work- shop held at Lewis Research Center, NASA CP-2016, 1977. 2. Jones, R. E., DieM, L. A., Petrash, D. A., and Grobman, J. , NASA TM 79009, 1978. 3. Mullins, B. P., AGARDograph No. 4, 1955. 4. Wentzel, W. , NACA TM 979, 1936. 5. Spadaccini, L. J. , and Te Velde, J. A., NASA CR- 159886, 1980. 6. Chiappetta, L. M., and McVey, J. B., UTRC 81-64 Report, 198 I. 7. Rao, K. V. L. and Lefebvre, A. H., Paper presented at First Specialist Meeting (International) of the Combustion Institute, Bordeaux, France, July 1981. 8. Marek, C. J. , Papathakos, L. C., and Verbulecz, P. W. , NASA TM X-3526, May 1977. 9. Spadaccini, L. J. , Trans. ASME, Vol. 99, Series A, January 1977. 10. Stringer, F. W. , Clarke, A. E., and Clarke, J. S., Proc. Auto. Div. , Institution of Mechanical Engi- neers, 1970. I I . Taback, E. D., P&WA TDM-2284, 1971. 12. Mestre, A., and Ducourneau, F,, Combustion Insti- tute European Symposium, 1973. 13. Spadaccini, L. J. , and Te Velde, J. A. , DOE/ NASA/ 0066-2, NASA CR-165315. 14. Lezberg, E. A., NACA TN 4028, 1957. 15. Freeman, G., and Lefebvre, A. H. , Paper presented at Central States Combustion Meeting, Lexington, March 1983. Received 20 March 1984; revised 19 June 1984