precedent, which are the primary sources. Secondary sources include commercial custom, textbooks and journals and Law Reform Commission Reports. The primary sources will be used in priority to the secondary sources, which will be used only if there is no primary source. . The adversarial system of law basically means that all trials !both criminal and ci"il# proceed on the basis that there is a contest between two competin$ parties. This is the system used in %ustralia and all &common law& countries. The in'uisitorial system is used by ci"il law countries. There are differences in the role of the jud$e, onus of proof and presumptions that apply. (. The common law rules were de"eloped in the common law courts and the rules of equity were de"eloped in the Chancery Courts. The )'uity courts were set up by the *in$ and applied the rules of natural justice. They were more 1 flexible, in terms of jurisdiction and remedies, than the common law courts and were therefore more attracti"e to liti$ants. Today, all courts apply common law rules and the rules of e'uity. +. Senior courts in the hierarchy of a court system dictate to the inferior courts how the law is to be interpreted and applied. This leads to consistency, fairness and predictability in the way the law is applied. The disad"anta$es are that all important cases ha"e to be reported and the jud$es in the middle and lower courts become &rubber stamps& in the interpretation of the law. ,. Courts apply strict rules of e"idence and procedure in the way cases are tried. Tribunals are less strin$ent in the application of rules and more efficient in disposin$ of cases. The people like tribunals because they pro"ide quick, cheap and informal hearings that in most cases do justice and keep e"eryone happy. There is no appeal from tribunals except in "ery limited circumstances, so the matter is &o"er and done with&. 2 -. Onus means burden of proof and standard means level of proof. .n a criminal trial the standard of proof is "ery hi$h, bein$ &beyond reasonable doubt&. .n a ci"il trial it is &on the balance of probabilities&. The hi$her standard of proof in criminal trials reflects the community/s concern that no innocent person should be incarcerated !&jailed&#. The 0ritish justice system !and therefore the %ustralian justice system# puts a "ery hi$h "alue on the freedom of the individual. 1. 2nder the Constitution, the %ustralian 3o"ernment has exclusive power to legislate in areas such as defence, mi$ration, currency, na"i$ation. .t has concurrent power to legislate in many other areas. Concurrent power is power that is shared with the states. Realistically, the states will not pass laws in these concurrent areas of law4makin$ power if the Commonwealth has power, because it would be futile to do so. 5. The common law rules of statutory interpretation are the Literal ule, the !olden ule and the "ischief ule. 3 The literal rule means to $i"e the words their literal, dictionary meanin$. .n most cases, this works well, but it can lead to absurd outcomes as in Bedford's Case. The courts would then apply the $olden rule, concludin$ that the parliament could not possibly ha"e intended that outcome. The mischief rule was sometimes applied to establish what problem !mischief# in society the %ct was meant to remo"e, and then interpretin$ the %ct to implement that objecti"e. The mischief rule is "irtually the same as the purposive approach# 6. &$xtrinsic& means &outside& material. %n example is &Hansard&, where all parliamentary debates are permanently recorded. 17. %elegated legislation is law made by a delegate of the &arliament, such as statutory rules or local laws made by a local $o"ernment council. 4