0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
27 Ansichten22 Seiten
Functional Safety Guide for Safety Instrumented Function Application Title 1 Add Footer via >Insert >Header and Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All safety barriers can be for prevention of the hazard occurring or for mitigation after an hazard occurs.
Functional Safety Guide for Safety Instrumented Function Application Title 1 Add Footer via >Insert >Header and Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All safety barriers can be for prevention of the hazard occurring or for mitigation after an hazard occurs.
Functional Safety Guide for Safety Instrumented Function Application Title 1 Add Footer via >Insert >Header and Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All safety barriers can be for prevention of the hazard occurring or for mitigation after an hazard occurs.
Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All To view drawing guides:
1. Right-click on slide and select Grid and Guides... 2. Check Display drawing guides on screen 3. Select OK Functional Safety Guide for Safety Instrumented Function Application Title 1 Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Content Why should you require a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF)?
Requirement when selecting the component according to IEC 61511 for a SIF
Assessment of component according to IEC 61508 to be implemented into a SIF
Advantages using fully assessed 9000 Series in SIF
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All SIF Why should you require a Safety Instrumented Function Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Hazard and risk assessment When going into functional Safety, the primary requirement of the IEC 61511 is to have a Functional Safety Management System with identification of the safety strategy to reach safety and identification of the people involved. People must be aware of their responsibility and be educate for it. One of the first step of functional safety is to realize a risk assessment to identify, analyze possible hazard events and define the risk reduction requirement when necessary. Main risk analysis technics are: HAZOP (Hazard and Operability analysis), FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis), Bow Tie, FTA (Fault Tree Analysis), ETA (Event Tree Analysis), A tolerable risk must be defined Risk related to the potential hazard Severity of the potential arm Probability of occurence Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Hazard and risk assessment Further the risk assessment, safety barrier will be defined with an associated risk reduction factor Safety barriers can be mechanical or Safety Instrumented Functions Safety Barriers can be for prevention of the hazard to occur or for mitigation after an hazard occurs. Safety Integrated Level (SIL) is introduced here as a risk risk reduction factor
Identification of the potential hazards Risk estimation Risk evaluation Risk reduction Tolerable risk targeted Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE MITIGATION Mechanical protection system Safety Instrumented System PREVENTION Mechanical protection system Safety Instrumented System BPCS (SNCC) Monitorins Systems Operator supervision PROCESS DESIGN Allocation of the safety function Protection Layer Model Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Safety Instrumented Functions When requested SIL level is defined, the mode of operation of the safety function shall be identified thus enable to implement component within an instrumented safety function using corresponding figures. DEMAND MODE OF OPERATION (Low demand) SIL Target PFD avg Target risk reduction 4 10 -5 to < 10 -4 >10 000 to 100 000 3 10 -4 to < 10 -3 >1 000 to 10 000 2 10 -3 to < 10 -2 >100 to 1 000 1 10 -2 to < 10 -1 >10 to 100 CONTINUOUS MODE OF OPERATION (High demand) SIL Target PFH 4 10 -9 to < 10 -8 3 10 -8 to < 10 -7 2 10 -7 to < 10 -6 1 10 -6 to < 10 -5 Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Requirement when selecting the component according to IEC 61511
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Statement of the IEC 61511 Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All SIS Design and Engineering SIS Design and Engineering An end-user has two possibilities in selecting component or sub-systems to be implemented in Safety Instrumented Functions.
Either the end-user can show that the device has a prior-use history in accordance with the requirements of IEC 61511 or
Either the device was developed and assessed according to IEC 61508 (this corresponds to an IEC 61508 full assessment) It is very important to notice that the first requirement is to be fulfilled by the end-user only.
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Requirement for Prior use evidence The Prior-Use clause of IEC 61511 states the following: IEC 61511-1, Section 11.5.3.1: Appropriate evidence shall be available that the components and sub-systems are suitable for use in the safety instrumented system. IEC 61511 , Section 11.5.3.2 : The appropriate evidence for devices must be a documented case that includes: Consideration of the manufacturers quality, management and configuration management systems Adequate identification and specification of the components or subsystems Demonstration of the performance of the components or sub-systems in similar operating profiles and physical environments The volume of operating experience Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Discussion on Prior use evidence Consideration of the manufacturers quality, management and configuration management systems? Do you verify the ISO 9000, the documented design process, the safety manual of your supplier ? Adequate identification and specification of the components or subsystems? (Description of the components including design revision information?) Do you verify your supplier version control of hardware, software? Do you review the return data and field failure feedback system ? Demonstration of the performance of the components or sub-systems in similar operating profiles and physical environments on the plant, within the company? Do you manage all operating profiles at your plant? Type of device, environment condition, The volume of operating experience? Do you have a necessary recorded experience? Prior use justification for component selection require high resources and cost
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Assessment of component according to IEC 61508
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Component certification to IEC 61508 For a manufacturer, being IEC 61508 compliant means being fully compliant to the standard not just a part of it. Part 1: General requirements (required for compliance) Part 2: Requirements for electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems (required for compliance) Part 3: Software requirements (required for compliance) Part 4 to 7 are supporting information Type A component shall be Part 1-2 compliant Type B component shall be Part 1-2-3 compliant At PR, we apply all requested parts for each Type A/B device of the 9000 Series
Technical requirements Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Component certification to IEC 61508
A Safety Management System (SMS) has been created and assessed at PR Competent and trained person, independency, Safety management plan, A hardware assessment is performed for each model of the 9000 Series Safety life cycle, Failure rates (FMEDA , Failure rates , SFF, HFT,) A Software assessment is performed for each type B devices of the 9000 Series Software Functional Safety plan, SW Safety Cycle, Validation planning, SW Safety validation, operation and modification Verification, Assessment by third party EXIDA Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT Being IEC 61508 means being fully compliant to the standard, not only part of it. At PR, we provide you: Functional Safety Management System certificate Software and/or Hardware Assessment Report FMEDA report Safety Manual SIL Capable Certificate
Nothings missing We are full compliant! Covering all 61508 requirement, our product can thus be selected according to the IEC 61511, the end user standard.
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Advantages using the fully assessed 9000 Series
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Example : SIL2 achievement
Sensor
Isolator SCS Isolator Actuator Simple device PR electronics 9113BA Invensys Triconex PR electronics 9107BA Foxboro SRI990 Type B HFT=0 SFF > 90% Type B HFT=1 SFF > 99% Type A HFT=0 SFF > 90% Type A HFT=0 SFF > 90%
SIL 2 Systematic Capability Systematic Capability Systematic Capability Systematic Capability PFD or PFH calculation to check if it achieves the SIL level requirement with corresponding Ti ( of all PFD SIF components) The requirements for the SIF for a SIL 2 is achieved Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Example : SIL2 achievement
Invensys Triconex Manufacturer Foxboro SRI990 Type B HFT=0 SFF <90% Type B HFT=1 SFF > 99% Type A HFT=0 SFF <90% Type A HFT=0 SFF > 90%
SIL1 only No Systematic Capability Systematic Capability No Systematic Capability Systematic Capability PFD or PFH calculation to check if it achieves the SIL level requirement with corresponding Ti ( of all PFD SIF components) The requirements for the SIF for a SIL 2 is not achieved Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Example : SIL2 achievement
Invensys Triconex Manufacturer Foxboro SRI990 Type B HFT=1 SFF <90% Type B HFT=1 SFF > 99% Type A HFT=0 SFF <90% Type A HFT=0 SFF > 90% No Systematic Capability Systematic Capability No Systematic Capability Systematic Capability PFD or PFH calculation to check if it achieves the SIL level requirement with corresponding Ti ( of all PFD SIF components) The requirements for the SIF for a SIL 2 is only partially achieved It MUST be completed by an END USER proven in use Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Assessment according to IEC 61508 at PR 21 PR electronics innovate with full assessment by means of : Functional Safety Management System assessment Hardware and Software assessment report on individual products SIL Capability Certificate on individual products
By selecting the PR system 9000 devices for Safety Instrumented Function, you ensure that the IEC 61511 requirements for component selection are always fulfilled!
Both SIL2 & SIL3 level can be achieved with the 9000 Series.
Add Footer via >Insert >Header & Footer Check in Footer, write in field, Click Apply to All Title 22