0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
197 Ansichten7 Seiten
The topic of our debate is THW Ban cellphones at schools. I believe that the students will be more focused on studying instead of wasting their time to play cellphones at school. Topic THBT Student addicts should be expelled from school. I define the topic as follow : a condition when a student has addiction to continuosly use drugs such as nicotin, marijuana, etc.
The topic of our debate is THW Ban cellphones at schools. I believe that the students will be more focused on studying instead of wasting their time to play cellphones at school. Topic THBT Student addicts should be expelled from school. I define the topic as follow : a condition when a student has addiction to continuosly use drugs such as nicotin, marijuana, etc.
The topic of our debate is THW Ban cellphones at schools. I believe that the students will be more focused on studying instead of wasting their time to play cellphones at school. Topic THBT Student addicts should be expelled from school. I define the topic as follow : a condition when a student has addiction to continuosly use drugs such as nicotin, marijuana, etc.
>First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. the topic of our debate is THW Ban cellphones at schools. Definition, I define the topic as follow : Cellphone or cellular phone or handphone in this topic, is a phone that can make and receive telephone calls over a radio link while moving around a wide geographic area. With the development of technology cellphones are provided with camera, internet access and many other facilities. I, as the first speake, will be the affirmative speaker. the second speaker, will be the negative speaker. while the third speaker will conclude the arguments. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, i believe that the students will be more focused on studying instead of wasting their time to play cellphones at school. I support this motion because of several reasons : - It will distract the others , -> a ringing phone or beeping text or buzzing reminder ar all distracting sounds that disturb the classroom. - Reduction in learning -> Students will more focused on their phones to reply messages or answer the phone, open social medias account or taking picture rather studying. - Cheating -> Cell phones offer a completely new way for students to cheat on test and asssignments. Students can answer questions with their phone/camera and text it to a friend who has the class in the afternoon allowing more opportunities to cheat. So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, it is important to ban cellphone at school. Because, it will distract the others , reduce the learning time and give the opportunity to cheat. Thats all from me as the affirmative speaker, thank you.
Topic THBT Student addicts should be expelled from school. >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. the topic of our debate is THBT Student addicts should be expelled from school.
Definition, I define the topic as follow : a condition when a student has addiction to continuosly use drugs such as nicotin, marijuana, etc. I, as the first speaker, will be the affirmative speaker. the second speaker, will be the negative speaker. while the third speaker will conclude the arguments. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, the student who is an addict will influence to other students to join him or her. So, it will be dangerous not only the individual but also the community. I support this motion because of several reasons : - Students who are addicted should go to rehabilitation house. They should be placed in rehabilitation house for addicted kids. They have the rights to be treated ther for several times. - Those who are addicted can influence other students. Other students might be tempted to also consume drugs because the are having daily interaction wtih those are addict. - Addicted students can be potential distractors for other students in class. Can you imagine what happen when those students suddenly feels like they need to get drugs in their system and do anything to get it. So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, here are some reasons why the addicted students should be expelled or not. The rehabilitation will be the best choice so the addicted student wouldnt influence the other students to use drug like what she/he does.
Topic THBT old vehicles should be removed from the street. >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. Definition, I define the topic as follow : old vehicles in this topic, the vehicles such as motorcycle, car, truck, bus etc., that are above 20 years old. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, the vehicles has more disadvantages to the people if they are still on the street. I support this motion because of several reasons : - Too much car on the street will create traffic jam. - The old vehicles are dangerous because, they will release more carbon monoxide in the air - Most of old vehicles are in the bad condition, it will dangerous if they are on the street. They can create accident. For example if they suddenly stop in the middle of street. It is possible that the other cars will hit them So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, the old vehicles bring more harm than good. Because will create traffic jam, they will release more carbon monoxide in the air, can create accident.
Topic THBT Drug sellers should be sentenced to death >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. Definition, I define the topic as follow drug sellers in this topic, drug sellers is who sells drugs illegally. Drug dealers can range from individual drug users buying a little extra of their drug to save money or to help pay for their habit, to groups working within highly organized money- making operations that run like any other business. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, Drug sellers will influence many people to use drugs, and people will be break the law of country. I support this motion because of several reasons : - Drugs is very dangerous for health, include can destroy body physical and spiritual. - And then becuase of drug user use drugs from drug sellers, can contaminate name of country. - For the religion, Drugs is strictly prohibited. And becuase of use or spread drugs is sin. So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, drugs sellers or drug dealers should be sentenced to death. Because can contaminate country name, make a sin, and can destroy body. If drugs sellers not sentenced to death, or they just punished in jail for a few year. They will spread drugs again in other time. So i very support this motion, Life without drugs is beautiful. That is my arguments about the drugs, to support the house to sentenced drugs sellers to death Thank you the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen for your attention. Good ...
Topic THW build the nucelar power plants >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. Definition, I define the topic as follow drug sellers in this topic THW build the nuclear power plants, Nuclear power plants is A nuclear power plant is a thermal power station in which the heat source is a nuclear reactor. As is typical in all conventional thermal power stations the heat is used to generate steam which drives a steam turbine connected to agenerator which produces electricity. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, Nuclear power plants can help preserve the environment by lessening the dependence on fossil fuels as source of energy. The burning of gas,oil and coal is believed by some environmentalists to contribute to atmospheric problem such as global warming and acid rain. I support this motion because of several reasons : - Energy supply, since the energy produced by nuclear power plants is man-made, it means that there is less of a need to depend on natural resources. This eliminates the concern about running out of energy due to exhausting the worlds resoucrces. - Cost saving, Nuclear power plants can produce energy in a more cost effective manner, according my explore, the cost per kilowatt- hour of nuclear electricity is 1.92 cents. By comparison, natural gas cost 2.68 cents and the cost of oil is 3.77 cents. Nuclear electricity is only slightly more expensive than coal fired electricity, which costs 1.88 cents per kilowatt our So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, nuclear power plants ...
Topic THW Ban people giving money to beggars >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. Definition, Beggars are people that homeless do not have work. Beggars may be found in public places such as transport routes, urban parks, and near busy markets. Besides money, they may also ask for food, drink, cigarettes or other small items. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, in my opinion beggars include in lazy people. Because what life is hard, beggars must be able to work. At least they work as housemaid. I support this motion because of several reasons :
- We should weigh the happiness pennies could give, If you find yourself with a few pennies in your pockets, pennies which are sometimes more of an inconvenience than anything else, why should we not give them to those who are asking for help? Those pennies mean relatively little to the reasonably well off, but they could make a great deal of difference to the homeless. It is a simple matter of weighing happiness. The happiness those pennies would cause a homeless person is a lot more than what those pennies would give to a reasonably well-off persons pocket or money jar. - It is better than giving money to organized charities. Regardless how happy the homeless person would be, completing such a direct act of charity will make you a lot happier than merely pledging money, even a more substantial amount, via a large charity. When giving to a large charity a lot of the money gets filtered out by administration. Street fund-raisers are often paid and so are various other administrators. As such, a higher percentage of your money would be going to the actual people who need it rather than to a large organization. So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, people who give the money to beggars should be ban. Because ...
Topic THBT Social networking brings more harm than good. >First Speaker (Affirmative) Good ... the judge(s) , ladies and gentlemen. Definition, Social networking is where someone or all people can access internet networking, and then they can correspond with other people to chat, share photo, search information etc. like playing facebook, twitter, path, instagram, bbm etc. I the affirmative speaker Believe that this motion is true because, from the news in TV one of harm social network is criminal and make a victim. I support this motion because of several reasons : - Using social media in social networking, it is just waste the time. We can do other activity more useful than using on playing social media. - You will be lazy person, if you sit and than play computer to access social network, you will addict, and you lazy to leave your computer. - Not good for body, if you use social network, of course you access with mobile phone or Computer or Laptop. Light from the electronic that, it make radiation, and than your eyes will minus. - With you access social networking, you will decerase concern with your envinronment So, the judges, ladies and gentlemen, i conclude that based on these arguments, Social Networking is not good, they bring more harm than good. People will become lazy person, and others. And the important is , social networking will decerase concern with your environment.