Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

Reflection on the

idea of nothing
On the reference of the idea of
nothing
It seems to me that there can be no
absolute nothing.

Arguments:
•an idea is not nothing; indeed,
every posible cognitive system is
material and, therefore, is a
function of matter; it is something
material: as a material state of a
material system; therefore, until
we have any idea, the absolute
nothing cannot be.
• on the other hand, if the quantity
of energy from universe is
constant, that is, if energy cannot
be destroyed, but only
transformed from a state in an
another state, than outer nothing
cannot be, therefore absolute
nothing cannot be, that is nothing
both inside and outside, cannot
be. If the empty space is
indestructible, than the same it
holds.
On the content of the idea of
nothing

By our experience of relative


nothing(e.g., an empty box or by
the experince of relative
destruction) we can arrive, by
mental operations, at the idea of
absolute nothing, by extension. Or
by thinking at a continuously
reduction of a cognitive content of
an idea(e.g., we can arrive until the
idea of 0). As we can arrive at the
idea of infinit...That is, by
increasing continuously somehow
an cognitive content.

But, any idea in order to be


understooded should to have a
content. Thus, idea of nothing
cannot be understooded without
starting or relating it with something
positive content. 0 is understooded
relative to quantity. The empty can
be understooded only relative to
matter or physical and space.

That is why, the idea of nothing


have, however, a content...it is not
merely negation, in addition is the
negation of all that is .

On the other hand, we must to


understand that the idea of nothing
is something material, is a material
state of a material system.

Only together it is inteligible.


~ single have not any meaning.

Even single, ~ have a content,


although not a meaningful content.

On the other hand, we must to


understand that the idea of nothing
is something material, is a material
state of a material system.

Therefore, the idea of nothing does


not involve an ideatic nothing.

However, we can think somehow at


the idea of absolute nothing positive
content, but this idea is not content-
empty. We can anticipate the idea of
absolute nothing, but we cannot
arrive to it...
My fundamental idea is that

there can be no absolute


empty-content idea

But, the content can come from


many sensorial systems, not only
from visual system.

And, many animals have contents.

I think that, that there are animals


with better senses than humans...

That is, why mental


opertations/processings/computation
s
are very important.
As was argued by Quartz and
Sejnowsky in The neural basis of
cognitive development , evolution of
cognition lead to a more flexible
capacity of forming free
representation...but, as they argue,
development also involve an
increase of the complexity of
representations...not a reduction to
nothing...
Therefore, a depeer understanding
of everithing involve more
logical/scientific/rational coerence
of all that is from bothom to top.

Nothing cannot increase the


inteligibility. I fear that idea of
nothing is a sterile one.

Metaphysics=chemistry.
Metachemistry=biology.
Over there idea of nothing
About the relation between any
posible mind and human brain

1.Human brain is a
concretmaterialisation of an
ontologically posible system.

2.The set of all the posible systems


depend on the properties of
ontological primitive/primitives, on
their numerical quantity, on the
trans-contextual conditions and on
the specific contextual conditions.
2* The relations are determined by
the nature of relates and by other
contextual parameters.

3. An ontologically posible mind is


not a product of human brain, but it
is a human discovery.
4. The posible minds, the properties
of ontologicall primitive/primitives,
the laws of univers, are not products
of human mind;their existence is not
conditionated by humans; humans
cannot exist if they would not exist;
they had existed before the life
apparition and can to exist if life
would no longer exist.

5. The posibility of human brain is


implicated by the properties of
ontological primitive/primitives, by
their sufficient quantity and by some
specific contextual conditions.

6. What is physically posible do not


depend at all on the imagination of
brain, but only on the universal and
local physical constraints.
7. Implementation of a certain
ontologically posible mind may be
not independent of human brain, but
what is ontologically posible in
every context in space and time will
never depend on human brain.

8. Question: What is the necessary


level of univers? Is there something
indestructible in Univers?
We can to conceive the whole space
being empty.
But, we cannot to imagine
something aspatial.

9. Is there something more primitive


than the empty space in univers?

10. Is there something that would


can affect the space itself?
As a kind of conclusion

Neither science nor animal


cognition, evolutionarily speaking,
do not begin with the nothing-
content, but with some content, at
least a sensorial content.
We do not start from nothing-
content, but we anticipate this idea
starting from some content.

More than simplity we want


inteligibility, and this involve not
only isolates primitives, but also
relations, structures, processes etc.

We should to arrive not to the idea


of nothing, but to the coerence of
the whole existence...to the
understanding of all that is. And
this is not thanks to the idea of
nothing.
Humans and the whole existence
will never participate toward idea of
nothing.

Neither are we started, nor we


should to arrive at the idea of
nothing.

We should to arrive at the


understandig of all that is, all that
was, all that will be and finally to
understanding all that can be and all
that cannot be; to an ultimate but
coerent understanding of all ...and to
the discovery of those posibities that
will make we happy. Not to nothing.
Neither simplity nor economy is our
ultimate and necessary scientific
and philosophical aims. By science
we want primarly understanding and
secondly happiness. The lather
involve extension of life quantity
and quality. The lather involve
justice&
love&peace&freedom&power and
maybe others.
Powered by http://www.referat.ro/
cel mai complet site cu referate

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen