A huge advantage of the regeneration theory is

that fine-tuning need not be perfect to achieve a

flat cosmos.

CREATING A STABLE COSMOS

The Big Bang cosmos as presently viewed is flat in 4-dimension space-time terms, yet
is destined to expand at an accelerated rate to its ultimate final entropy. A regenerating
cosmos on the other hand is also flat but exists perpetually at stable equilibrium. Our
local universe reflects the flatness of the cosmos, but fluctuates in size with the
expansions and contractions of the wave it inhabits.

Gravitational mass density is in constant contention with the propulsive force of
regenerating black holes. The multiple relationships between the forces required to create
this stable cosmos and oscillating universe are described here.


The cosmos is filled with wave energy whose
contractive and expansive effects net out to zero
with sufficient mass density to keep the cosmos flat.
If the cosmos begins with an omega equal to or
greater than 1, it will settle into equilibrium at
which omega equals 1. The equilibrium is a
stable one, because any deviation from this
norm brings into play opposing contractive
or expansive forces until equilibrium
is restored.


The wave-dominated harmonic cosmos self-tunes
itself to achieve perpetual life. An initial mass
density greater than 1 adjusts itself to equal 1
through adjustment of both propulsive and
compressive dynamics.

CREATING A STABLE COSMOS


The circumstances within the cosmos are different than those that exist within a single
universe. If ours is a perpetual cosmos, as the Darwinian assumptions imply, then the
cosmos will have an omega equal to 1. It will be both stable and flat. The primary and
secondary wave actions governing the constituent universes will be balanced between
expansion and compression, thereby neutral in effect. The mass/energy density of the
cosmos will be sufficient to restrain all expansive energy, including that generated by the
quasars themselves, vacuum energy, stellar energy, and any other types of expansive
energy that may exist.

Omega and Quasar Propulsion

The initial mass density of a regenerating cosmos is not critical for its survival. If its
originally created mass density is sufficient to prevent perpetual expansion, the cosmos
will adjust itself to reach a balance between expansion and contraction. Its mass density
determines the level of expansion but can never force it into complete collapse.

This fortuitous stability is due to the propulsive effect of regeneration. The explosions of
generative quasars in the multiple wave contractions maintain a specific density of the
cosmos in which the multiple quasar forces of expansion are in equilibrium with the
gravitational forces of compression. From this we can derive a principle:

A regenerating cosmos self-adjusts its mass density to the level at which average
gravitational intensity equals average repulsive intensity. On average, therefore, omega
equals 1.

As a result of these cosmic dynamics, it is no longer necessary to be concerned with the
specific omega of our local universe. These dynamics also obviate the theoretical
problem concerning why and how our cosmos obtained an omega so close to 1. With
regeneration, this is no longer a critical concern. A regenerating cosmos permits a huge
range of densities for its successful origination and continued existence. Inflation need
no longer be posited as a cause, although it may or may not have played its role when the
universe was formed in the distant past.

An analogy to this expansive effect exists all around us. Without gravitational pressure
upon it, air expands. Without gravity it would dissipate into space. However, air and
other gases adjust to whatever gravitational pressures they experience. Although, unlike
the quasars, the molecules do not increase in number with compression, they change their
density until a balance is achieved with the pressure upon them. This balance
corresponds to the equilibrium level of a regenerating universe. The quasar molecules
increase in density until achieving equilibrium.

How Differs from the Big Bang?

How does this method of achieving stability differ from what is necessary in a Big Bang
universe? Fortunately for achieving perpetual existence, there is a major difference
between the capabilities of a Big Bang universe and those of a regenerating universe to
reach a balance between expansion and compression. A regenerating universe is able to
adjust its own mass/energy density and its forces of expansion. It does not have the
disadvantage of dealing with a one-time expansion, which must be compensated for. It
creates its own incremental units of expansion, which adjust to whatever is required to
achieve the proper balance.

Only one physical requirement exists: the cosmos must initially be created with an omega
greater than 1, sufficiently greater to offset any propulsive energy that may exist. This
large omega would then cause the cosmos to contract. As the cosmos contracts it brings
into play increased forces of expansion. These forces increase at a much more rapid rate
than gravitational intensity increases. This is accomplished by an exponential increase in
quasar generation as described in the previous chapter.

The contraction continues only until a balance is achieved. At this point the cosmos
becomes stable and remains stable. The cosmos itself is at equilibrium, even though its
component universes may not be. In this way the cosmos adjusts itself to a form suitable
for sustaining a self-regenerating permanent existence.

Comparing Force Relationships

The explosive impact of congested quasars in the compression phase of the primary
waves will prevent the cosmos from collapsing. The cosmos will stabilize at an
equilibrium level between expansion and contraction. The universe will not stabilize but
will fluctuate. These differing characteristics are illustrated by the formulas. Definitions
of the key variables and their relationships are shown below.


Generative Quasars: The principal sources of energy that maintain cosmic expansion
and create the cosmic waves in the first place are the generative quasars and primary
wave fireballs resulting from the eruption of black holes. The quasar fireballs are the
most powerful energy sources in existence, rivaling the Big Bang itself. They therefore
play the primary role in the force relationships within the cosmos.

Quasars are less prominent in our local universe because we are higher up the wave
hierarchy. The principal force in our universe is probably the wave action resulting from
the cosmic turbulence.

Let Qerepresent the expansive influence of quasars as determined by the subnuclear
propulsion relationships described in the previous chapter.

Let Qg represent the gravitational impact of quasar energy.


Wave Energy: Wave energy is both expansive and compressive within the cosmos. In
our universe it is presently expansive with a compressive gravitational component
contributing to the mass/energy density of our universe. Ultimately, when we pass the
top of the cycle, wave energy in our universe will become compressive.

In the cosmos as a whole wave energy is expansively neutral but gravitationally
compressive, contributing significantly to its mass/energy density. The following aspects
of wave energy are significant within the cosmos and the universe.

Let Werepresent expansive wave energy.

Let Wc represent compressive wave energy.

Let Wgrepresent the gravitational impact of wave energy.


Other Energy:

Let Oerepresent the net expansive influence of all other energy in the cosmos, such as
stellar energy and vacuum energy.

Let Og represent the gravitational impact of all other energy.


Mass:

Let Mgrepresent the gravitational impact of all mass in the universe, including galaxies,
stars, gases, particulate matter and dark matter.

From these symbols we may develop representations of the balance of forces within the
total cosmos and within our local universe, consistent with the gravi-nuclear
interactions. described in Gravi-Nuclear Force Relationships.

Cosmos Force Relationships

From these assumptions the equation for a stable cosmos at cosmic equilibrium would be


Qe +Oe =Wg + Mg +Qg +Og

where Wg represents the sum of both expansive and compressive wave action. We
balances our to zero impact for the cosmos as a whole and is omitted from the equation.
As shown by the boldface italics, Qe most likely dominates the expansive side, while the
gravitational impact of wave energy Wg most likely dominates the mass/energy
compressive side of the equation.

This means that at cosmic equilibrium the total expansive energy in the cosmos is equal
to the total gravitational force including the gravitational components of energy. Bold
face italicized entries emphasize the overriding significance of quasar energy on the one
side and the gravitational component of wave energy on the other side in the dynamics of
the cosmos.

Universe Force Relationships

Force relationships within the universe differ from those in the cosmos because of their
cyclical nature. Wave energy controls the nature of the cycle. It is expansive in the early
stages and compressive in the latter. This variability affects the intensity of the other
forces. The present expansive phase of our universes cycle exhibits the following
relationships.


Expansive

We +Qe + Oe >Wg +Mg +Qg +Og

In the expansion phase of our universe We is the dominant source of expansive energy. It
probably outranks the quasar energy that exists in the compression phase. Wg is the
major contributor to the mass/energy density of the universe at this stage, but is
insufficient to reverse the cycle. These relationships are contrasted with the power
relationships within an expansive primary wave wherein the big bang fireball of
quasars initiates and dominates the expansion.

The eventual compressive phase of our universe will exhibit the following relationships:



Compressive

Qe + Oe <Wc + Wg +Mg +Qg +Og

Once the top of the cycle is reached, compressive wave energy Wc and the gravitational
impact of wave energy Wg almost certainly will dominate the compression. Almost all
forces are compressive in the down phase of the cycle This dominance should also be
reflected in the compression phase of the primary waves.

Wave energy is the most significant mass/energy density and expansive influence within
our universe at the present time.

Conclusion

Quasars contribute to the early galaxies, but wave action most likely plays the dominant
role in the mechanics of our local universe. Wave energy is responsible for the
universes apparent accelerating expansion and for its subsequent contraction. After
further study if it were found that the accelerating expansion observations were in error,
that the universe is either expanding at a constant rate or even decelerating, it would only
be necessary to assume a different location on the expansion curve to explain the new
dynamics.

For the total cosmos, the fireballs of the primary waves provide the principal expansive
energy. Since the expansions and contractions of waves neutralize each other, the
principal impact of the waves will be the gravitational compressive effect of their energy
density. This energy density would be a significant contribution toward maintaining a
stable cosmos.






COSMIC DENSITY AND DYNAMICS
The Wave Universes





Alpha Our Beta
Universe Universe Universe




Primary Wave



Secondary Waves





Cosmos Cross Section


The cosmos adjusts itself to maintain expansive/compressive equilibrium through the
actions of the primary waves

At equilibrium omega =1. The cosmos is flat and stable.

Wave energy provides a major portion of the mass/energy density of the cosmos.

The mass/energy density of the cosmos is sufficient to restrain within it any other
expansive energy such as stellar energy and quantum vacuum energy.

Individual universes such as ours have varying mass/energy relationships depending
upon the phases of the waves within which they are embedded.