Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
" #
1=2
where n is the number of examples, O
i
the observed values
and P
i
the values predicted by the model. Both indices
express the mean value of the error committed by the
forecast; the difference between the two consists in the fact
that the MAE is less sensitive than the RMSE at the
extremes of the differences between the predicted and
observed values.
The results obtained with the model developed are
summarized in Table 1.
The approach based on recurrent neural networks is
certainly of interest in this setting, given the relative
simplicity of their structure and of the learning algorithm,
which enables them to be used like a black box, in that they
do not reveal their transfer function in legible terms. On the
other hand, being practically non-transparent to the user is
often also one of the greatest drawbacks of neural networks,
since it is basically impossible to give a physical
interpretation of the resulting control law. To overcome
this problem, our attention has turned to neuro-fuzzy
networks: in practice, these are neural networks (that
consequently use the typical learning algorithm based on
back propagation) whose structure describes a fuzzy system,
which can consequently be fully interpreted by the user. For
the present study, we used a class of adaptive networks
functionally equivalent to the fuzzy inference systems. The
proposed architecture is dened as an adaptive neuro fuzzy
inference system, or ANFIS (Appendix 2).
For each of the input working conditions, we dened two
Gaussian-type membership functions. The two membership
functions distributing the whole universe of each input refer
to the low, and high fuzzy sets. Fig. 5 shows the neuro-
fuzzy network and the membership functions.
The advantage of using an adaptive type of model is that,
once the input and output data have been provided, the rules
are generated automatically. In this study, since there were
six inputs with two membership functions each, the number
of rules amounted to rZ2
8
Z256.
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (x 30 min)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (x 30 min)
V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
s
)
V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
s
)
values predicted
values observed
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90 (b)
(a)
values predicted
values observed
Fig. 4. Comparison between the predicted (dashed) and observed (solid)
values: (a) NZ2, (b) NZ6.
Table 1
NZ2 NZ6
Max value jP
i
KO
i
j 0.0850 0.1055
Max error value (%) 5.79% 7.93%
MAE 0.019827 0.026812
RMSE 0.027314 0.033934
F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 316325 321
Fig. 6(a) and (b) below show the outcome of the
generalizations obtained for the set with eight inputs (QZ8)
in the case of NZ2, 2 stepsZ1 h ahead and in the case of
NZ6, 6 stepsZ3 h ahead.
The results obtained with the model developed are
summarized in Table 2.
Clearly, the neuro-fuzzy systems has a much lower
RMSE than the others, though they take more time for data
processing than recurrent neural network. Since the lowest
max error value took priority in the application analyzed,
we preferred to use neuro-fuzzy systems, which prove more
accurate in adapting the input data to the output data.
4. Conclusions
Based on the above considerations, there are two
advantages to be gained from applying a condition-based
maintenance plan that includes using soft computing
techniques and fundamental goals that justify its adoption
in practical terms:
its inability to control and govern early faults or
deterioration: so the fundamental goal of the
resulting CBM plan will be the chance to predict
and prevent catastrophic faults. The aim is to
benet from the chance to know well enough in
advance of the onset of a fault to enable the
necessary measures to be planned, or at least to
avoid the consequences of the fault degenerating;
its inability to take action in relation to the real
conditions of the equipment: preventive mainten-
ance plans often schedule repairs to be done
earlier than is really necessary. In times of
increasingly limited resources, it becomes vitally
important to be able to postpone the deadline for
maintenance measures whenever we can, so the
money-saving factor is a far from secondary issue.
Even when there is no direct inuence on the costs, the
proposed CBM approach aims to identify the reason for
repeated early damage. In the case of the pump considered
here, for instance, the information deriving from the
monitoring procedure prompted us to redesign the equip-
ment, adopting hydrodynamic bearings to reduce the need
for maintenance.
Whenever no particular deterioration was detected or
the equipment was found in unexpectedly good repair, these
cases provided a precious reference on which to base
comparisons and considerations for future inspections
A11
.
.
.
A1m
An1
.
.
.
Anm
TT
TT
TT
TT
N
N
N
N
w
i
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
r-1
r
w
i
.
.
.
w
i
f
i
premise parameters consequent parameters
Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5
y = x
t+N
Input
X
t-7
.
.
.
.
X
t
Fig. 5. Neuro-fuzzy architetture.
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (x 30 min)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (x 30 min)
V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
s
)
V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
s
)
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90 (b)
(a)
values predicted
values observed
values predicted
values observed
Fig. 6. Comparison between the predicted (dashed) and observed (solid)
values: (a) NZ2, (b) NZ6.
F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 316325 322
and in order to complete the history of the systems being
monitored.
The introduction of a prediction tool is very like any
other investment, which initially demands sacrices that
outweigh the advantages it can offer. It is important to bear
in mind that the CBM plan was developed in steps and many
parameters, e.g. the previously mentioned alarm levels, or
the monitoring frequency, are constantly being corrected to
make them more suitable in terms of the effectiveness of the
system as a whole. This ne adjustment process, which can
account for as much as 50% of the effort required, is called
recalibration.
The effects of CBM must be assessed in relation to its
inuence on all the other maintenance-related activities and
the ultimate measure of its performance is the variation in
global costs. The new activities that are introduced mean
new costs that aim to reduce existing costs. For a thorough
assessment, we need to bear in mind all the aspects affecting
its weight and all the aspects that test its effectiveness, such
as the cost of the instruments that are used (their purchase,
upgrade, and calibration) and the cost of the man-hours
needed on the one hand, the cost of condition-based
maintenance measures and the (reduction in) the costs of
corrective measures on the other.
The best way to conduct a correct and detailed analysis of
all the costs associated with the maintenance policy is
obviously the CMMS (providing it is given suitable data),
which quanties the costs by processing the job feedback
data and the job card data.
Appendix 1
The following steps were involved in the criticality
analysis for the plant studied here:
identify and list all the objects at the plant liable to
maintenance;
dene the relevant data, the preventive mainten-
ance plans, and the recording of any faults;
attribute the consequences to the risk items
considered;
extract only the objects that can be effectively
monitored using CBM methods;
determine the criticality of the single machines
and select which machines to monitor.
Combining the susceptibility to a damage mechanism
with the simultaneously-evaluated consequences enables us
Table 2
NZ2 NZ6
Max value jP
i
KO
i
j 0.0495 0.0760
Max error value (%) 3.65% 5.85%
MAE 0.016173 0.022826
RMSE 0.023514 0.028061
Fig. A1. Plan of risk analysis and denition of the monitoring frequency.
F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 316325 323
to determine the risk class (N,L,M,H,E,X) for a given
apparatus and for a given damage mechanism (Fig. A1).
The equipment selected for predictive maintenance was
then input as lines in a machine-monitoring matrix (Fig. A1)
in order to attribute the related monitoring activities and
their frequency.
Concerning the denition of the monitoring frequency, it
should be noted that this is a variable parameter in the
context of a CBM plan, continually liable to adjustment and
correction. In fact, it is a good idea to adjust and adapt the
sampling frequencies as a function of the trends and the
level of the values being measured. In daily practice,
moreover, it is also important to take into account the
availability of personnel for the monitoring and analytical
procedures, and the time these procedures take.
Appendix 2
A neuro-fuzzy network is a method for determining the
parameters of a fuzzy system of Takagi-Sugeno type,
represented as a special Multilayer Perceptron. The Sugeno
fuzzy model was proposed by Takagi, Sugeno and Kang to
develop a systematic approach to the fuzzy rules generated
by a given set of inputs and outputs. For n inputs, x
i
, with m
i
membership functions, iZ1,.,n, and one output, y, the
total number of rules, r, is dened as: rZ
Q
n
iZ1
m
i
. A typical
rule with a fuzzy if-then structure is expressed by:
Rule
(i)
: If x
i
is A
i
1
1
and . and x
n
is A
i
n
n
, Then f
i
Zp
i0
C
p
i1
x
1
C.Cp
in
x
n
, where x
j
, jZ1,., n, are non-fuzzy input
variables, A
i
k
k
, 1!i
k
!m
k
, are fuzzy variables related to the
kth input with the i
k
th membership function, and p
ij
, iZ1,.,
r, are constants in the consequent. The membership
functions for A
j
n
, m
A
j
i
x
i
, for example, can be of the
Gaussian type: m
A
j
i
x
i
; c
j
; s
j
Zexp
Kx
i
Kc
j
2
2s
j
2
n o
The parameters {c
j
,s
j
} in this layer are referred to as
premise parameters.
The ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system) is
based on a neural network comprising ve levels (Fig. 5).
The r nodes on the second level represent the antecedents
of the fuzzy rules. The activation functions on this level (in
the same number as the fuzzy rules) only perform the logical
AND operation between the active inputs, which can be
done by choosing the minimum among the degrees of
membership or by calculating their product. The weights of
the input connections consequently acquire the binary
values 0 and 1 in order to discriminate the input signals in
the combination relating to the fuzzy rule, so they do not
undergo the learning procedure. The output of the ith node is
denoted as w
i
: w
i
Z
Q
n
jZ1
m
A
j
i
x
j
.
The activation functions on the rst level determine the
degree of satisfaction of each rule and perform the following
operation: wZ
w
i
w
1
C.Cw
r
. The nodes of the fourth layer
represent the consequents of the rules and thus calculate
the rules output values. Each node is connected to a node
on the previous level and to all the input variables. The
value of the output will be given by: w
i
f
i
Z w
i
p
i1
x
1
C.C
p
in
x
n
Cp
i0
. Finally, the output node on the fth level
determines the output value simply by adding together the
values of its input, i.e.: yZ
P
i
w
i
f
i
Z
P
i
w
i
f
i
P
i
w
i
.
In the present paper, a hybrid learning algorithm was
used to determine the constants in the consequent of the
ANFIS (Table A1). Thus the neuro-fuzzy systems learning
process adopts a hybrid type of approach using the least
squares method and the back propagation method already
used to train neural networks.
References
Bakirtzis, A., Theocharis, J. B., Kiartzis, K. J., & Satsios, K. J. (1995). Short
term load forecasting using fuzzy neural networks. IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, 10(3), 15181524.
Bevilacqua, M., Braglia, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). The classication and
regression tree approach to pump failure rate analysis. Reliability
Engineering and System Safety, 79, 5967.
Caputo, A. C., & Pelagagge, P. M. (2002). An inverse approach for piping
network monitoring. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process
Industries, 15, 497505.
Chen, J.-R., & Yang, Y.-T. (2004). A predictive risk index for safety
performance in process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the
Process Industries, 17, 233242.
Chung Wu, H. (2004). Fuzzy reliability estimation using Bayesian
approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46, 467493.
Dash, P. K., & Liew, A. C. (1995). Power demand forecasting using neural
network with an adaptive learning algorithm. IEE Proceedings of
Generation, Transmission and Generation, 142(6), 160268.
Figueiredo, K., Vellasco, M. M. B. P., Pacheco, M. A., & Neto, R. L. S.
(2000). A modelling neural nets and fuzzy logic to very short-term
forecasting VII Symposium of specialists in electric operational and
expansion, Curitiba, Brazil, 2328 May pp. 16.
Fortuna, L., Rizzo, A., Sinatra, M., & Xibilia, X. (2003). Soft analyzers for
a sulfur recovery unit. Control Engineering Practice, 11, 14911500.
Ho, S. L., Xie, M., & Goh, T. N. (2002). A comparative study of neural
network and Box-Jenkins ARIMA modeling in time series prediction.
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 42, 371375.
Jang, J. S. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference
system. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 23,
665685.
Javadpuor, R., & Knapp, G. M. (2003). A fuzzy neural network approach to
machine condition monitoring. Computers & Industrial Engineering,
45, 323330.
Kiartzis, S. J., Zoumas, C. E., Theocharis, J. B., Bakirtzis, A. G., & Petridis,
V. (1997). Short-termload forecasting in an autonomous power systems
using articial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,
12(4).
Table A1
Forward transfer Backward transfer
Antecedent
parameters
Fixed Updated by descend-
ing gradient
Consequent
parameters
Estimated by least
squares method
Fixed
Signals Output mode Error signal
F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 316325 324
Kourti, T., & MacGregor, J. F. (1996). Multivariate SPC methods
for process and product monitorino. Journal of Quality Technology,
28, 409.
Lucifredi, A., Mazzieri, C., & Rossi, M. (2000). Application of
multiregressive linear models, dynamic kriging models and neural
network models to predictive maintenance of hydroelectric power
systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 14(3),
471494.
Macintyre, J., Smith, P., Harris, T., & Brason, A. (1994). Neural network
for intelligent machinery diagnostics. Engineering System Design and
Analysis, 64, 507512.
Medsker, L. (1994). Design and development of hybrid neural network and
expert systems IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks-
Conference Proceedings, v3 pp. 14701474.
Radmer, D. T., Kuntz, P. A., Christie, R. D., Venkata, S. S., & Fletcher,
R. H. (2002). Predicting vegetation-related failure rate for overhead
distribution feeders. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 17(4),
11701175.
Roberts, C., Dassanayake, H. P. B., Leharasab, N., & Goodman, C. J.
(2002). Distributed quantitative and qualitative fault diagnosis: Railway
junction case study. Control Engineering Practice, 10, 419429.
Van Wyk, E. M. P., & Hoffman, A. J. (2003). Detecting long-term trends in
turbo-generator stator end-winding vibrations through neural network
modelling. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 253(3), 529544.
Wang, W. Q., Golnaraghi, M. F., & Ismail, F. (2004). Prognosis of
machime health condition using neuro-fuzzy systems. Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing, 18, 813831.
You, H. S. (1998). Real-time monitoring and detecting of after-burning
hazards of continuous catalyst regenerators. Journal of Loss Prevention
in the Process Industries, 11, 2541.
Zhang, D., Bai, X., & Cai, K. (2004). Extended neuro-fuzzy models of
multilayer perceptrons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 142, 221242.
F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 316325 325