Subject: FW: Documents for math waiver Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:45:06 PM From: Heath, Shauna L Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:13 PM To: Kischner, Gerrit Cc: Tolley, Michael F; Zombro, J anet K; Sipe, Shawn L Subject: RE: Documents for math waiver Gerrit,
I appreciate you pointing me to the waiver document again. I apologize I missed the language from Cathy. For most schools there is not a district obligation for the purchase of consumables even if there is a waiver in place. Your waiver indicates that we do have an obligation. What I need from you is a breakdown of materials that you need for 13-14 including cost. Please send your needs to Shawn and we will get going on your order.
I do want to make sure that future funding will depend on the data review at the end of next year and if we do have an adoption in 14-15 then this will need to be revisited.
Thanks for being patient about this Gerrit.
Best,
Shauna From: Kischner, Gerrit Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:34 PM To: Heath, Shauna L Cc: Tolley, Michael F; Zombro, J anet K Subject: RE: Documents for math waiver Thanks Shauna
Certainly the adoption process may change this for 14-15, but Im a little puzzled that the solution for this year could be a percentage of the cost of the consumables. What I had established with Cathy Thompson was that we would be covered on the consumables up to the cost of the equivalent materials in the adopted curriculum (EDM), and that is what we did for the 11-12 school year. I used the EDM consumable ordering form to determine what this total would be and placed the order through Jean Metzger for that amount.
In addition, for both the 11-12 and the 12-13 school year, the full cost (textbooks, workbooks and teachers guide no manipulatives unfortunately) was provided for all of my growth classrooms (these were the classrooms at each grade level added as a result of the NSAP). For the 13-14 school year, I am adding three homerooms: first grade, third grade and fifth grade.
Thanks for the reminder about assessing during the 13-14 school year. I would like to work with you to determine what the benchmarks ought to be.
Thank you,
Gerrit
From: Heath, Shauna L Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:10 PM To: Kischner, Gerrit Cc: Tolley, Michael F; Zombro, J anet K Subject: RE: Documents for math waiver
Gerrit,
Thanks for your waiver documents. You are correct that 2020 included grandfathering in schools with existing waivers. J ust a heads up that we will need to assess your data next school year as 2020 also states:
Schools that received a waiver prior to the 2011-12 school year will retain their waiver for the 3-year period, and will be assessed during the 2013-14 year to determine if the data supports continuing a waiver and if the schools are interested in continuing.
As you also know 2020 does not state that any funding will be provided from the district, however, if we do have funds we will consider giving a percentage of what would have been spent on consumables to the building. What we ask is that you submit a request for funds and indicate that you have:
1. Identified the research based resource selected 2. Communicate the rationale for selecting the resource 3. Communicate how the school has funded the resource to this point and the subsequent funding for future years
Requests for funds will be reviewed by the Executive Director of Curriculum and Instruction and Content Area Manager. Funds will be determined based on availability, need and the above criteria.
Hope this helps!
Shauna Heath Executive Director of Curriculum and Instruction Seattle Public Schools slheath@seattlepublicschools.org 206-252-0049
From: Kischner, Gerrit Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:19 PM To: Heath, Shauna L Subject: Documents for math waiver
Hi Shauna
Here are our reaffirmation documents of the waiver from 2009 (Santorno) and 2011 (Thompson), plus the original 2008 waiver application. The Board discussion of Policy 2020 expressly included grandfathering schools with existing waivers.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Gerrit
From: Russell, Leann Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:49 PM To: Kischner, Gerrit Subject:
Leann Russell Schmitz Park Elementary/WQ-270 Administrative Assistant 206 252-9700 phone 206 252-9701 fax
From: Kischner, Gerrit To: Barbello, J ulie A Subject: FW: Schmitz park Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:41:27 PM From: Santorno, Carla J Sent: Friday, J une 19, 2009 7:16 AM To: delaFuente, AnnaMaria Cc: Kischner, Gerrit Subject: RE: Schmitz park yes
From: delaFuente, AnnaMaria Sent: Thursday, J une 18, 2009 12:22 PM To: Santorno, Carla J Subject: Schmitz park
Hi Carla,
Gerrit at Schmitz Park is asking about the status of their waiver (to keep using Singapore). This is already a yes, correct?
Anna-Maria
Anna-Maria de la Fuente Mathematics Program Manager Seattle Public Schools 206.252.0062 http://www.seattleschools.org/area/math/index.xml
From: Kischner, Gerrit To: Barbello, J ulie A Subject: FW: Schmitz Park waiver Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:41:11 PM Attachments: 5th grade math progress.doc From: Kischner, Gerrit Sent: Friday, J une 12, 2009 11:37 AM To: Santorno, Carla J Cc: J ohnson, Patrick M Subject: Schmitz Park waiver
Dear Carla --
The purpose of this email is to clarify the status of the Everyday Math waiver for Schmitz Park that allows us to continue our full-scale implementation of Singapore Math. It is my understanding that our waiver is now a standing waiver granted with the requirements that 1) all of our teaching staff hold true to their commitment to implement Singapore Math with fidelity at all grade levels, K-5, and 2) that the results from assessments given at both the state and district level continue to demonstrate that our students are making progress on par or exceeding students Districtwide. This was my understanding from our December 2008 meeting, which included my director, Patrick J ohnson, during which you indicated that we could expect an email from you stating these two stipulations. These points were also at the core of the statement I made in J uly 2008 when I met with you and Superintendent Goodloe- J ohnson to interview for the principalship at Schmitz Park when I stated that the dimensions of a curriculum rollout like this required three to five years in order to adequately measure its success. Please confirm that I have understood the conditions of our standing waiver accurately.
I am proud of the significant accomplishment that Schmitz Park teachers have made in this first year of our buildingwide implementation of Singapore. Here are a few of the highlights of our work: Created a pacing guide at each grade level to mirror the EveryDay Math expectations and meet state standards; Math alignment document was taken through three revisions detailing content, mental math strategies, common language and tools used for each grade level; Unit assessments reviewed in grade level teams; Two parent nights: the first one in October was attended by over 200 parents and provide the strong overview of the program, the second in February was run seminar style and widely appreciated; Full-day professional development in teaching mental math strategies; Tuning protocol developed to guide instruction of model drawing; Data demonstrating progress meeting or exceeding the progress shown by students across the district as measured by the District math assessment. In fifth grade, for example, our students' scores rose an average of 32 percent over the course of the year, while districtwide progress at fifth grade as 20 percent (see attached).
As I have stated before, I appreciate the flexibility and commitment to innovation and curriculum development you have demonstrated in granting this waiver in the past. I believe the students of Schmitz Park and of the whole district are better for it. Our greatest insight this year has been in the development of "model drawing" as a problem solving tool that grows students' understanding and skills in rich context. We look forward to sharing our insights with other schools around the district as they expand their development of the Singapore Math-EveryDay Math articulation.
Thank you for your encouragement and support. We look forward to your confirmation.
Gerrit
________________________________________________ Gerrit Kischner, Principal Schmitz Park Elementary School 5000 Spokane Avenue SW Seattle, Washington 98116 206.252.9700 gakischner@seattleschools.org
Go to College for Free, or Pretty Darn Close to it!: The perfect guide for Juniors, Seniors, and College Freshmen looking to maximize scholarship money
Impact Assessment of Stem Initiatives in Improving Educational Outcomes: Research Report from a National Evaluation Conducted to Inform Policy and Practice