POSC 217 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE GLOBAL ERA
Instructor Ann Florini Title: Professor of Public Policy Tel: 6828-0297 Email: annflorini@smu.edu.sg Office: School of Social Sciences, Level 4, Room 057
There are no prerequisites for this course, although it is recommended that students have taken the SMU core course on Business, Government, and Society.
This course is open to all students but is particularly intended for students interested in public policy, political science, business, international relations, law and regulation, and economics.
COURSE DESCRIPTION*
This course addresses a key question facing the world: what is the role for business in solving the worlds problems? Singapore and other societies have long assumed that governments exist to provide public goods and regulate business, while the private sector exists to seek profits and civil societys purpose is to help the needy and speak out about the public interest. But the distinctions among the three sectors have been blurring, as societies everywhere try to manage wicked problems in a global economy dominated by corporate actors. Old assumptions about appropriate public and private roles are giving way to new systems of collaboration.
Among governments, notions of policy co-creation with business and society and reliance on corporate self-regulation are replacing top-down approaches to rule-making. Societal pressures are forcing businesses to re-think assumptions about their license to operate, as consumers and investors increasingly hold the accountable for their effects on the environment and on society. Now, even such business gurus as Michael Porter are calling for a transformation of private sector practices to make them compatible with social and environmental imperatives.
This is a world where corporations increasingly deliver essential services and meet basic needs, exert heavy influence over public policy and find that their consumers and investors increasingly hold them directly accountable for their effects on the environment and on human rights. 2
The course charts and analyses the growth of the corporate responsibility agenda and explores the new interactions across business, government, and society. It provides a holistic understanding of the drivers for change, the conceptual, legal and practical hurdles to reconciling public and private sector responsibilities, the different roles played by companies, governments, civil society, institutional investors and social entrepreneurs in shaping current approaches, and a sense of what the future holds, particularly in the emerging markets and developing countries of Asia.
COURSE GOALS*
This course aims to enable students to understand the current debates about the changing nature of the social license to operate facing business and to think systematically about how these issues are and should be addressed. The course will enable students to answer key questions: What are the respective responsibilities of business and government in the rapidly changing context of the 21 st century? Who decides, and who should decide? How, in practical terms, do business and government deal with the new pressures on business? Should you be a social entrepreneur, creating new business models to solve the worlds problems, or a social intrapreneur, changing corporate behemoths from the inside out?
Specific Learning Objectives
By the end of this course, students will be able to: Analyse and evaluate arguments about the appropriate roles of business and government Advise businesses and governments on strategies for responsible business conduct, drawing on the full array of instruments including philanthropy, codes of conduct, non-financial disclosure, social intrapreneurship, and new business models
ASSIGNMENTS
Readings: Students are expected to have completed the relatively small number of required readings prior to the beginning of each class session, and to be prepared to refer to those readings in class discussion. In addition, students are expected to incorporate the readings into all assignments, even if those readings have not been discussed in class.
Case studies: Small groups of students will prepare presentations and 1500-word written analyses of each of the case studies.
Debates: Small groups of students will prepare and lead in-class debates on selected topics throughout the term
Paper: Each student will prepare an individual 2500-word analysis of a corporate sustainability report, due in the final class session.
ASSESSMENT METHODS
This course does not have a mid-term or a final exam. Assessment will be based as follows: 3
Quizzes: 30 % (Most class sessions will begin with short quizzes on the weeks assigned readings, in lieu of mid-term or final exams.)
Case studies: 20% o Presentation o Written analyses
Debates: 20%
Analysis of corporate sustainability report, individual writing assignment: 30%
Academic Integrity
Students are expected to observe the highest standards of academic integrity. Any incidence of misconduct like plagiarism will constitute grounds for failing the course. With regard to participation in class discussions and other activities, students are expected to participate vigorously, but politely, in keeping with appropriate standards of civil discourse.
CLASS SESSIONS
A session may include any combination of lecture, individual presentations, videos, and class discussion (either in small groups or as a whole). 4 WEEK ONE
Introduction to the course
WEEK TWO
The 21 st century world and the changing roles of business and government
The evolution of the role of the state, why private sector actors have become critical players, public goods theory, the concept of embedded liberalism, Asian models, and the evolving social contract for business.
This session will include a debate led by a small group of students. Preparation for the debate will require some on-line searching in addition to the assigned readings. The debate team will meet with the professor in the week before the class session to plan the sessions.
Required reading:
Milton Friedman, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970 available at http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp- business.html
SECRETARY-GENERAL PROPOSES GLOBAL COMPACT ON HUMAN RIGHTS, LABOUR, ENVIRONMENT, IN ADDRESS TO WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM IN DAVOS, available at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/1999/19990201.sgsm6881.html
Michael Porter and Mark Kramer: The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 89 Issue 1/2, pp. 62-77
Rawi Abdelal and John Ruggie, The Principles of Embedded Liberalism: Social Legitimacy and Global Capitalism, chapter seven in In New Perspectives on Regulation, edited by David Moss, and John Cisternino, 151162 (read pp. 151 to the top of 157, the rest is optional). Cambridge, MA: Tobin Project, 2009. Available at http://www.tobinproject.org/sites/tobinproject.org/files/assets/New_Perspectives_Ch7 _Abdelal_Ruggie.pdf
DEBATE TOPIC: Friedman right or wrong?
For Further Reading:
Nelson, Jane. 2004. The Public Role of Private Enterprise: Risks, Opportunities, and New Models of Engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 1. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m- rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_1_nelson.pdf
Just Good Business: A special report on corporate social responsibility. The Economist. January 19th 2008. http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/docview/223995377/13AD8F97D0E1 7289520/2?accountid=28662
5 Schwab, Klaus. Global Corporate Citizenship: Working with Governments and Civil Society. Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p107-118. http://search.ebscohost.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&A N=28018931&site=ehost-live&scope=site
WEEK THREE
The Instruments of Corporate Social Responsibility: Philanthropy, Codes, Disclosure
Required Reading
Caroline Fiennes, Philanthropy Works When the Giver Can Gain Too, Ethical Corporation May 2012, pp. 41-44.
David J. Vogel, Corporate Responsibility for Working Conditions in Developing Countries, in The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 75-109.
Ann Florini, The Coming Democracy: New Rules for Running a New World, chapter five, Business pp 89-117.
Archon Fung, Mary Graham, David Weill, and Elena Fagotta, Transparency Policies: Two Possible Futures, available at http://www.transparencypolicy.net/assets/two%20possible%20futures.pdf
Review relevant websites:
UN Global Compact, http://www.globalcompact.org/
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, http://www.oecd.org/about/0,2337,en_2649_34889_1_1_1_1_1,00.html
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) for Business Coalition, http://teebforbusiness.org/
For further reading
Archon Fung, Mary Graham, David Weill, Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
6 WEEK FOUR
Corporate Influence: Good or Evil?
ASSIGNMENT:
This session will include two debates, each of which will be led by small groups of students. Preparation for the debates will require some on-line searching in addition to the assigned readings. The debate teams will meet with the professor in the week before the class session to plan the sessions.
Required Reading (for all students):
John Ruggie, Charles Kolb, Dara ORourke, Andrew Kuper, The Impact of Corporations on Global Governance, Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs and the Centre on International Cooperation (2004). Available at http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/5016.html
Benedicte Bull, Morten Bs, and Desmond McNeill, Private Sector Influence in the Multilateral System: A Changing Structure of World Governance? Global Governance 10 (2004), 481498. http://libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=tr ue&db=edsjaf&AN=edsjaf.10.2307.27800543&site=eds-live&scope=site
Debate topic One: Trade, TRIPS and the question of corporate influence
Helpful readings: ActionAid, Under the influence: Exposing Undue Influence over policy-making at the WTO (2006). Available at http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/174_6_under_the_influence_final.pdf
Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite Intellectual Property, Corporate Strategy, Globalisation: TRIPS in Context, 20 (2002) Wisconsin International Law Journal 451- 480. Available at http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wisint20&div=23&?&collec tion=journals
Debate Topic Two: Business influence on national government
Helpful readings:
Nelson, Jane. CSR and Public Policy: New Forms of Engagement between Business and Government. CSR Initiative Working Paper No. 45, Harvard Kennedy School, 2008. Available at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_45_nelson.pdf
Peterson, Kyle and Pfitzer, Marc. Lobbying for Good. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter 2009. Available at 7 http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/docview/217165889/13AEE99C49F1 51960EB/26?accountid=28662
Ward, Halina. Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: Taking Stock. The World Bank Group. Washington DC: 2004. Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/16014IIED.pdf
Halina Ward, Tom Fox, Emma Wilson, Lyuba Zarsky, CSR and Developing Countries: What scope for government action? Available at http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02247.pdf
McKinsey & Company, How business interacts with government. McKinsey Global Survey Results (2010). Available at: http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/How_business_interacts_with_government_McKins ey_Global_Survey_results_2495
8 WEEK FIVE
NGO advocacy
This session will include a debate led by a small group of students. Preparation for the debate will require some on-line searching in addition to the assigned readings. The debate team will meet with the professor in the week before the class session to plan the sessions.
Required Readings (for all students):
Malcolm Macintosh and Ruth Thomas, Corporate Citizenship and the Evolving Relationship between Non-Governmental Organisations and Corporations, Britisn- North American Committee (2002). Available at: www.cdhowe.org/pdf/bnac_45.pdf
Debra L. Spar and Lane T. La Mure, The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business, California Management Review vol. 45, no. 3 (Spring 2003), pp. 78-101. http://search.ebscohost.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN =9912638&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Steve Steckelow, How Web of Activists Gives Coke Problems in India, Wall Street Journal June 7, 2005. http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/docview/398955847?accountid=286 62
Debate topic: Greenpeace is good for global corporations
Special session on making public presentations. Special session on case study analyses. 9 WEEK SIX
Public-private partnerships
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS: One group of students to present analysis of the TNT/WFP Partnership case study One group of students to present analysis of the Mumbai case study.
Required Reading:
Roger Cowe, Business/NGO Partnerships -- Whats the Payback? Ethical Corporation April 2004. http://earthmind.net/ngo/docs/partnerships-payback.PDF
Glenn Prickett, Can corporate-NGO partnerships save the environment? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=1180Posted February 7, 2003.
Zadek, Simon. 2006. The Logic of Collaborative Governance: Corporate Responsibility, Accountability, and the Social Contract. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 17. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m- rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_17_zadek.pdf
J. Austin, Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Businesses:, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29:1, Supplement 2000, 69-97 http://nvs.sagepub.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/content/29/suppl_1/69.full.pdf+html
World Economic Forum, Partnering to Strengthen Public Governance: The Leadership Challenge for CEOs and Boards, 2008. Available at http://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Davos08_Leadership-Challenge.pdf
CASE: When the Music Changes, So Does the Dance: The TNT/WFP Partnership, Moving the World Five Years On, Gatignon Aline and Van Wassenhove Luk, INSEAD case
CASE: Financing Slum Rehabilitation in Mumbai: A Nonprofit Caught in the Middle and Financing Slum Rehabilitation in Mumbai: A Non-Profit Caught in the Middle: Epilogue
10
WEEK SEVEN
Social Entrepreneurship versus Social Intrapreneurship Part One
Required reading:
UNDP, Creating Value for all: Strategies for Doing Business with the Poor (2008). Available at: http://www.undp.org.bd/info/HQ%20Publications/Report_growing_inclusive_markets. pdf David Grayson, Innovating from Within, available at http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic- content/news/documents/manfocus29/Innovating-from-within-low-res.pdf
CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENTS:
Case-study presentations and 1500-word written briefs.
Group 1: Aneel Karnani and Moses Lee, Vision Correction in the Developing World case 1- 428-820, August 18, 2009
Group 2: Ted London and Maulin Vakil, Hindustan Lever at the Base of the Pyramid: Growth for the 21st Century case 1-428-604 06 November 2006
Group 3: Raed Elaydi and Charles Harrison, Credit Cards for the Poor: HSBC in Sri Lanka, case 1-428-888 January 28, 2010
Further Reading
Oxfam International, Oxfam Poverty Footprint: Understanding business contribution to Development (November 2009), Briefings for Business series paper no. 4. Available at: http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/poverty-footprint
UNRISD, Structural Change, Social Policy and Politics (2010) Chapter 9, pp. 247 272. Available at: http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/search/BBA20D83E347DBAFC1257782 00440AA7?OpenDocument
Rhys Jenkins, Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and poverty, International Affairs 81: 3 (2005) 525 540 http://search.ebscohost.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h &AN=17077879&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Dhanarajan. S and Fowler, P (2008) Business and the Millennium Development Goals, Briefings for Business Series, Oxfam GB http://www.oxfam.org.nz/resources/onlinereports/Business%20MDGs.pdf
Week Eight: BREAK WEEK
11 WEEK NINE
Social Entrepreneurship versus Social Intrapreneurship Part Two
Simanis, E. and Hart, S., The BOP Protocol: Towards a Next Generation BOP strategy (2008) http://www.bop-protocol.org/docs/BoPProtocol2ndEdition2008.pdf
Aneel Karnani, The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (California Management Review, Vol 49, number 4, 2007, pp 90-111). http://search.ebscohost.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN =25995889&site=ehost-live&scope=site
CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENTS Imran Chowdhury and Thierry Sibieude, World Toilet Organization: Leveraging Resources for Social Impact, 2012, oikos case collection
Ali Farhoomand and Shiu Kau Wong, The Aquaculture Industry in the Philippines: Creating Social Values at Marina Gana Vida Harvard Business Review case study June 21, 2012, Prod. #: HKU980-PDF-ENG
C. K. Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (Wharton School Publishing, 2005)
Elkington, J., and Hartigan, P., The Power of Unreasonable People: How Social Entrepreneurs Create Markets That Change the World (Harvard Business Press, 2008)
12 WEEK TEN
Business, the Resource Crisis, and Environmental Sustainability Part One
Risk and reward in the sustainability sphere
CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENTS: One group of students will present the Tata case study. Another group will present the Epson China case. A third group will present the Monsanto case. The presenters will be expected to incorporate the assigned readings into their analyses of the case studies.
Required Readings:
Volans, The Biosphere Economy, available at http://www.volans.com/wp- content/uploads/2010/03/The-Biosphere-Economy1.pdf
Amory Lovins, Hunter Lovins, and Paul Hawkins, A Road Map for Natural Capitalism, Harvard Business Review, 2007, Vol. 85 Issue 7/8, p172-183
Case studies: 1. Tata: Leadership with Trust. Oana Branzei, 2010 2. Epson China, available at http://pdf.wri.org/bell/case_1-56973-512- 3_full_version_english.pdf 3. Monsanto, parts A and B, available at http://pdf.wri.org/bell/case_1-56973-475- 5_full_version_a_english.pdf and at http://pdf.wri.org/bell/case_1-56973-480- 1_full_version_b_english.pdf
Further Readings
Ma, Jun, Cheung, Ray, et al. October 2010. Greening Supply Chains in China: Practical Lessons from China-based Suppliers in Achieving Environmental Performance. WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, available at http://pdf.wri.org/working_papers/greening_supply_chains_in_china_en.pdf
Dana Krechowica and Shally Venugopal, Analyzing Environmental Trends: Taking the Pulse of Asias Financial Community, World Resources Institute Working Paper, June 2010, available at http://pdf.wri.org/working_papers/analyzing_environmental_trends.pdf
The Procter and Gamble Company, Disposable and Reusable Diapers A Life-Cycle Analysis, available at http://pdf.wri.org/bell/case_1-56973-167- 5_full_version_english.pdf (note - this brief case study is useful as an introduction to life cycle analysis).
13 WEEK ELEVEN
Business, the Resource Crisis, and Environmental Sustainability Part Two: disclosure and/or codes of conduct as the solutions?
Required reading
International Finance Corporation and World Resources Institute, Emerging Risk: Impacts of Key Environmental Trends in Emerging Asia, available at http://pdf.wri.org/emerging_risks_emerging_asia.pdf, 1-29 (read 1-7, skim 8-29).
Video: Whats the Price of Nature? Pavan Sukhdev TED talk, www.ted.com/talks/pavan_sukhdev_what_s_the_price_of_nature.html
DEBATE: Palm Oil and the Environment RSPO versus Nestle/GAR
Suggested reading: Toby Webb, Transforming Business Models Slowly, Ethical Corporation June 2012, pp. 24-29.
Partnership: Nestle, Golden Agri Resources, and the Forest Trust Ethical Corporation, May 2012, p. 8.
WEEK TWELVE
Business and Human Rights
Required Reading
Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROTECT, RESPECT AND REMEDY FRAMEWORK. Available at http://www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-UN-draft-Guiding-Principles-22-Nov- 2010.pdf
John Ruggie, Clarifying the Concepts of Sphere of Influence and Complicity: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/16, 5-25 (May 15, 2008). http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,459d17822,466942422,484d1fe12,0.html
Debate: corporations and the responsibility to protect human rights
Suggested Reading Beth Stephens, The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights 20 BERKELEY J. INTL L. 45, 54-59 (2002). http://libproxy.smu.edu.sg/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.as px?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=6625193&site=eds-live&scope=site www.business-humanrights.org
14 Larry Cat Backer, On the Evolution of the United Nations 'Protect-Respect-Remedy' Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context (June 3, 2010). Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, No.1, 2010. Available at: http://www.heinonline.org.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/scjil9 &id=83&collection=journals&index=journals/scjil
WEEK THIRTEEN
Course wrap-up
Note: the individual writing assignment, an assessment of a corporate sustainability report, is due at the beginning of class.
Suggested Reading: Mandy Cormack and David Grayson, Focus on corporate impact and improve business performance, Ethical Corporation June 2012, pp. 40-43.
Toby Webb, Sustainable Living Gets Top Billing, Ethical Corporation May 2102 pp. 38-40.
WEEK FOURTEEN: Review week (no formal class session)