0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
55 Ansichten10 Seiten
The top 1% of the richest Americans control somewhere between 35% and 40% of the nation's wealth. The wealthiest top 20% held 89% of total cash, leaving only 11% of cash for the bottom 80% of our corporate rated universe. The growing wealth gap is due to unrepatriated overseas cash.
The top 1% of the richest Americans control somewhere between 35% and 40% of the nation's wealth. The wealthiest top 20% held 89% of total cash, leaving only 11% of cash for the bottom 80% of our corporate rated universe. The growing wealth gap is due to unrepatriated overseas cash.
The top 1% of the richest Americans control somewhere between 35% and 40% of the nation's wealth. The wealthiest top 20% held 89% of total cash, leaving only 11% of cash for the bottom 80% of our corporate rated universe. The growing wealth gap is due to unrepatriated overseas cash.
Richer Primary Credit Analyst: Andrew Chang, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5043; andrew.chang@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: David C Tesher, New York (1) 212-438-2618; david.tesher@standardandpoors.com Contributor: Ka-Kin Leung, Research Contributor, San Francisco Table Of Contents Corporate Wealth Is Concentrated In Relatively Few Hands The Cash To Assets Ratio Gap Is Widening The Growing Wealth Gap Is Due To Unrepatriated Overseas Cash . . . . . . Resulting In A Domestic Cash Shortfall Near $100 Billion Domestic Cash Shortfall Is Offset Through Synthetic Cash Repatriation Higher Debt Has Not Hurt The Top 1%'s Credit Profiles The Rich Will Continue To Get Richer WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 1 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer Much has been written recently about the growth of income inequality in America: that the top 1% of the richest Americans control somewhere between 35% and 40% of the nation's wealth and that this wealth inequality has widened since the start of the Great Recession. While most of the discussion has been about individuals and households, a similar wealth gap has developed between the top 1% and the remaining 99% of U.S. corporations. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' analysis has found that, out of a record $1.53 trillion in cash and short-term investments held by U.S. nonfinancial corporations we rate (about 1,800 issuers) as of year-end 2013, the wealthiest 1% (18 issuers) held 36%, or about $535 billion, of total cash, an increase from the 27% they held five years ago. The top 1% comprises mostly strong investment grade ('A' and higher) issuers, primarily in the technology and health care industries. Further, the wealthiest top 20% held 89% of total cash, leaving only 11% of cash for the bottom 80% of our corporate rated universe (see "2014 Cash Update: Cheap Debt Fuels Record Cash Growth," published April 14, 2014 on RatingsDirect for further analysis of overall cash growth in the U.S.). Overview Wealth distribution among U.S. corporations is becoming ever more concentrated, with the top 1% controlling 36% of the overall cash and short-term investments versus 27% five years ago. We attribute the growing wealth gap to rising overseas cash balances, which remain unrepatriated due to U.S. tax consequences, and strong credit markets, which have enabled the top 1% to "synthetically repatriate" the cash through cheap debt in order to make up a domestic cash shortfall as high as $100 billion. Despite the higher debt, the credit profiles of the top 1% remain intact, with their net wealth, or net cash positions, even stronger today than they were five years ago. Without a clear path to corporate tax reform, we expect the wealth inequality to widen over the near term. In our view, current U.S. corporate tax policy and accommodating credit market conditions have been primarily responsible for this growing wealth gap. We believe the top 1% generates more than half of their cash flow offshore, which is mostly unrepatriated due to high potential taxes. The result: Overseas cash accounts for 83% of overall cash for companies among the top 1% that report it. At the same time, however, companies are concentrating their cash uses domestically, mostly for shareholder returns and capital spending, and we believe the gap between the domestic sources and uses of cash may be as high as $100 billion for the top 1% alone. In turn, the top 1% is turning to the debt market to fund the domestic cash deficit through what we call synthetic cash repatriation. Still, a rising level of absolute debt has not hurt the top 1%'s credit profiles in our view. In fact, the top 1%'s net wealth or net cash position is stronger now than it was five years ago. With no near-term shift in tax policy or a tax holiday in sight, we expect the top 1% to continue increasing their share of the overall cash pie through overseas cash growth and domestic borrowings. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 2 1331431 | 301740986 Corporate Wealth Is Concentrated In Relatively Few Hands In 2013, the top 1% of the largest cash holders among Standard & Poor's rated nonfinancial corporates (18 out of approximately 1,800 issuers) held 36% of the $1.5 trillion in total cash and short-term investments. This ratio is materially higher than the 27% reported in 2009 and continues a steady climb in wealth concentration among the top 1%. In contrast, the remaining 99% held 64% of the overall cash and short-term investments in 2013, a significant decline from 73% reported in 2009. More broadly, the wealthiest top 10% controlled 78% of the cash, and the top 20% held 89% of the total cash, leaving only 11% of the cash for the bottom 80% (more than 1,400 issuerssee chart 1). Chart 1 In all, the top 1% increased their cash and short-term investments by 11% year-over-year, or by more than $50 billion, during 2013. Given the global nature of their business, the five largest cash holders belonged to the technology industry, and a total of seven technology issuers accounted for 57% of the wealthiest 1%. Five health care companies were among the top 1% and made up 21% of the total. As expected, the ratings distribution was strongly biased toward investment grade, with 15 out of 18 issuers in the 'A' rating category or higher, with only one speculative-grade issuer (General Motors) among the richest 1%. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 3 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer Chart 2 The Cash To Assets Ratio Gap Is Widening The division between the 1% and the 99% is even more glaring when comparing the ratio of cash and short-term investments to total assets. Over the past five years, the top 1% has steadily increased the cash to assets ratio, to 23.6% in 2013 from 20.4% in 2009. In contrast, the 99% have been stuck in the 7% area since 2009 despite the gradually improving economic outlook (see chart 3). The 99% comprises a diverse group of large investment-grade issuers and small, many private, speculative-grade issuers. In contrast to the top 1%, the 99% tend to be less global with higher domestic cash balances, which are more easily distributed to shareholders. Sponsor-held companies, no matter how profitable, tend to keep modest cash balances at all times and contribute to the low cash-to-assets ratio. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 4 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer Chart 3 The Growing Wealth Gap Is Due To Unrepatriated Overseas Cash . . . The top 1% comprises large global enterprises generating significant cash flow. Based on our analysis that the top 1% derives about 55% of its revenues offshore, we estimate that more than half of the cash flow is generated offshore as well. The cash generated overseas is rarely brought onshore due to taxes of up to 35% upon repatriation. This is on top of taxes paid in the country in which the revenue was generated. As a result, overseas cash continues to accumulate untouched. Of the eight issuers disclosing their overseas cash positions among the top 1%, 83% of their overall cash was held overseas, an increase from 79% in 2012. These eight issuers grew overall cash balances by $41 billion, or 15%, during 2013, but $43 billion of this growth came from overseas, indicating that domestic cash balances actually fell by $2 billion during the year. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 5 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer Chart 4 . . . Resulting In A Domestic Cash Shortfall Near $100 Billion Unlike the sources of cash flow, which are generated both domestically and offshore, uses are concentrated domestically, mostly for share repurchases, dividends, and capital spending, leaving many companies with domestic cash deficits even as overseas cash accumulates. Assuming that the geographical source of cash flow is similar to the revenue mix (45% domestic versus 55% overseas), we believe the top 1%'s domestic cash flow is not even sufficient to cover dividends and net share repurchases (there would be a deficit of roughly $25 billion). In all, net of other uses, including acquisitions and the estimated portion of domestic capital spending, we believe that the mismatch between domestic cash sources versus uses accounted for as much as a $100 billion cash shortfall in 2013 for the top 1%. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 6 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer Chart 5 Domestic Cash Shortfall Is Offset Through Synthetic Cash Repatriation As overseas cash continues to grow untouched, the top 1% has supplemented its domestic cash shortfall through the credit markets. The eight issuers in chart 4 alone issued $41 billion in new debt during 2013, nearly matching the $43 billion growth in overseas cash via synthetic cash repatriation. Large debt issuances by cash rich companies, such as Apple Inc. (AA+/Stable/A-1+) and Cisco Systems Inc.(AA-/Stable/A-1+), during the past year support this view. We believe the availability of cheap debt has been a key driver for the record cash balances for not just the top 1%, but for U.S. corporates overall. Further, without access to the accommodating credit markets, the top 1% would likely not have provided the returns that shareholders have become accustomed to in recent years. Or at the very least, the cash balances would be a lot lower after repatriation taxes and shareholder returns. Higher Debt Has Not Hurt The Top 1%'s Credit Profiles Despite the rising absolute debt level of the top 1%, their credit profiles have not deteriorated. If we view cash and short-term investments as wealth, a perspective on net wealth (or cash minus debt) is just as important from a credit perspective. From this vantage point, the top 1%'s net wealth is perhaps even stronger today than it was five years ago. In 2009, the top 1% held 85 cents of debt for every $1 of cash while the 99% held $4.56 of debt for every $1 of cash. By WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 7 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer 2013, the top 1%'s net cash position strengthened, to just 63 cents of debt for every $1 of cash, despite the increase in the absolute level of debt. We view this as proof that, despite the easy access to the credit markets, the top 1% has generally exercised restraint by limiting debt issuance to less than total cash growth. Conversely, the net cash position deteriorated somewhat for the 99%, to $4.96 of debt for every $1 of cash by 2013. We attribute this mostly to the same benign credit market conditions that have allowed smaller, many sponsor-held, issuers to increase leverage for shareholder distributions. In all, this large net wealth disparity translated into a $200 billion net cash position for the top 1% versus a $3.8 billion net debt position for the 99% in 2013. Chart 6 The Rich Will Continue To Get Richer The rising cash balances of the top 1% are a result of tax-policy driven synthetic cash repatriation and an accommodating credit market full of yield-starved investors. Although companies in a volatile industry, such as technology, need a strong source of liquidity or a good cash cushion, we believe tying up nearly a quarter of a corporation's assets in mostly inaccessible cash is not what these issuers had in mind. We believe that, if given the choice, most would prefer to repatriate the cash and limit debt issuances. However, investors are demanding greater WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 8 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer return of this cash through share buybacks and dividends, regardless of where its domiciled. With no near-term shift in tax policy or a tax holiday in sight, we expect the top 1% to increase their cash balances further over the intermediate term through overseas cash growth and accompanying domestic debt issuances. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 9 1331431 | 301740986 2014 Cash Update: Corporate America's Richest 1% Keep Getting Richer S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Copyright 2014 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 11, 2014 10 1331431 | 301740986