0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
588 Ansichten4 Seiten
This document summarizes the author's analysis of two students' written work samples and identification of errors. For the first student, who is at a basic A1 level, errors included omitting words like "years" when stating their age and prepositions. For the second student, who is at an intermediate B1 level, errors included issues with subject-verb agreement and unclear meaning. The author provides rationales for correcting common error types and suggests focusing corrections on particular patterns to make the process more effective for teachers and learning for students.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
Task 3. Focus on the Learner Written Language. Aldemar Torres.
This document summarizes the author's analysis of two students' written work samples and identification of errors. For the first student, who is at a basic A1 level, errors included omitting words like "years" when stating their age and prepositions. For the second student, who is at an intermediate B1 level, errors included issues with subject-verb agreement and unclear meaning. The author provides rationales for correcting common error types and suggests focusing corrections on particular patterns to make the process more effective for teachers and learning for students.
This document summarizes the author's analysis of two students' written work samples and identification of errors. For the first student, who is at a basic A1 level, errors included omitting words like "years" when stating their age and prepositions. For the second student, who is at an intermediate B1 level, errors included issues with subject-verb agreement and unclear meaning. The author provides rationales for correcting common error types and suggests focusing corrections on particular patterns to make the process more effective for teachers and learning for students.
TASK 3. FOCUS ON THE LEARNERS WRITTEN LANGUAGE. ICELT UNINORTE.
ALDEMAR JESUS TORRES COGOLLO
In this task I will identify and correct errors in two samples of written works from two different students . One is a 10 grader in a Colombian public school . She is in a basic level and can probably be classified as an A1. The other written work is from a student at the Instituto Tecnologico de Soledad Atlantico. She is in the intermediate level ( level 6) . Student 1 First student was asked to write a short message about bullying. She was supposed to be suffering this bad practice at school and the she would communicate how she feels about it. Student 2 Second student was asked to write the answer to two questions. What would you do If you were somebody else? What would you do If you had a million dollar? Rationale for Correction I never thought that the color red could produce such a negative attitude towards writing from a student. This reflection comes to my mind, because I used red without the intention of hurting a student`s self-esteem. Creative writers are eager to show their creation without paying attention to rules or grammar patterns. Blue or Green pencils are more neutral colors and they definitely will help students to have a more positive reaction to teachers feedback. This student has a basic level (A1). This is a special class because it is part of a piloting program. Students had to write a short letter where they assumed the position of a hypothetical student who was a bullying victim. Students had to express how they feel, what the problem was about and finish the text with a reflecting sentence. TASK 3. FOCUS ON THE LEARNERS WRITTEN LANGUAGE. ICELT UNINORTE. ALDEMAR JESUS TORRES COGOLLO
One of the written mistakes found was I am Laura, I am 14 old. This is a typical case where something is missing. Students tend to forget some parts of a collocation . It has to be corrected because she is a 10th grader and she must know what the correct expression is because the missing word is used all the time when students refer to their age. But what caught my attention is that the missing word is years which is a strange error because if the writer uses transfer from L1 to L2, then that would not have to be the missing word, maybe old , and of course in that case it would have been corrected . She also made a mistake by writing I am new school. She wants to say that she is a new student at school or in the school. It is another case of something missing. But in this case, she misses a preposition and a rule related to . It is important to correct this kind of mistakes because they prove the lack of understanding of certain basic patterns. However, any possible reader might identify the real meaning of the utterance. She continues her writing with my classmate of the new school dont like me. She tries to express that her new classmates do not like her, but she uses the same words new school . This is a typical mistake because students tend to write concepts and ideas that were previously expressed.
They annoy me because my color of skin is black. In this utterance, we can identify he students try to write an idea using their mother tongue as a guide. Obviously, this expression can be understood for a native reader , but it reflects the excessive use of translation . They rumored of me, they say Im ugly. Students change the tense of the assignment. Suddenly, they start using the past. This is something normal at this stage of TASK 3. FOCUS ON THE LEARNERS WRITTEN LANGUAGE. ICELT UNINORTE. ALDEMAR JESUS TORRES COGOLLO
the learning process , students are not aware of the tense they use in a written task; they tend to make a mix of them. Almost in the final part , the student tries to finish by writing I don`t want to go to school , is a torture. First part of this sentence is correct, but in the last part there is not subject. Students forget an English simple rule that says: subjects can not be omitted. The correct is It is a torture. The student writes I want study in other school . There are 3 mistakes here, one of them has to do with the word other instead of another; and besides of that she misses the preposition to after the verb want . I did not correct these two mistakes, because I considered that even though the utterance is not grammatically correct, any English speaker can understand what she meant. The second written work belongs to an ITSA student. She had to write the answer to two questions. Few errors were found on the first answer. She starts by writing If I were the presidents , I would This is a basic error because she is in a 6 level course and this grammar rule should be mastered by that time. That can be classified as a noun ending error . Two possible correct sentences are: If I were the president or If I were a president . Then , she writes which will have to be stored in different dustbins depending on what sort of rubbish it is. There is an error at the end of the sentence, two subjects in a sentence ( rubbish it ). Later, she wants to express an idea about Colombia inequality with the sentence: I would remove all social classes that distinguish between rich and poor . This idea is not clear, what she wanted to say is that she would eliminate the social classification used by the state. TASK 3. FOCUS ON THE LEARNERS WRITTEN LANGUAGE. ICELT UNINORTE. ALDEMAR JESUS TORRES COGOLLO
Finally, correcting students errors can be a time consuming activity for teacher and students. Focusing in a particular pattern of errors is a good strategy; it can help to reduce hour and hours of checking and students can be more aware of their mistakes and errors. Word count: 992 Reference List Harmer, J. 2001.The practice of English Language Teaching. Longman. Chapter 7, pages 110-112. Harmer, J. 2004. How to teach writing. Longman.