0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
7 Ansichten8 Seiten
Storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms progressed in 39.8% (308) and 32.3% (250) of men, and improved in 33.1% (256) and 23.4% (181), respectively. Being widowed, higher plasma estradiol and depression at baseline predicted the progression of storage lower urinary tract symptoms only.
Storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms progressed in 39.8% (308) and 32.3% (250) of men, and improved in 33.1% (256) and 23.4% (181), respectively. Being widowed, higher plasma estradiol and depression at baseline predicted the progression of storage lower urinary tract symptoms only.
Storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms progressed in 39.8% (308) and 32.3% (250) of men, and improved in 33.1% (256) and 23.4% (181), respectively. Being widowed, higher plasma estradiol and depression at baseline predicted the progression of storage lower urinary tract symptoms only.
Risk Factors for Progression or Improvement of Lower
Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Prospective Cohort of Men
Sean Martin, Kylie Lange, Matthew T. Haren, Anne W. Taylor, Gary Wittert* and Members of the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study From the Freemasons Foundation Centre for Mens Health (SM, MTH, GW), School of Medicine (SM, KL, GW), and Population Research and Outcome Studies (MTH), University of Adelaide, and SANSOM Institute, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia (AWT), Adelaide, South Australia Purpose: We determined the metabolic, lifestyle and physical factors associated with progression or improvement of storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms in a population based cohort of men. Materials and Methods: After the exclusion of men with prostate or bladder cancer and/or surgery from the study, progression and improvement of storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms was assessed using the AUA-SI (American Urological Association symptom index) in 780 men, age 35 to 80 years at baseline, who attended 5-year followup clinics. Results: Storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms progressed in 39.8% (308) and 32.3% (250) of men, and improved in 33.1% (256) and 23.4% (181), respectively. In nal adjusted regression models greater bother and physical activity at baseline predicted improvement in storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms, while greater income, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lower triglycerides predicted improvement of storage lower urinary tract symp- toms only. Being widowed, higher plasma estradiol and depression at baseline predicted the progression of storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms, while greater abdominal fat mass and obstructive sleep apnea risk predicted the progression of storage lower urinary tract symptoms only. Older age, lower high- density lipoprotein cholesterol, testosterone, income, previous benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction at baseline predicted the progression of voiding lower urinary tract symptoms only. The initiation or continued use of a-blockers or anticholinergics (storage lower urinary tract symptoms), and 5a-reductase inhibitors (voiding lower urinary tract symptoms), were associated with symptom improvement. Conclusions: Lower urinary tract symptoms may progress or remit. Even accounting for medication use, progression may be associated with modiable disease, or metabolic or behavioral factors, which are also risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. These factors should be looked for and managed. Key Words: prostatism, epidemiology, urinary tract physiological phenomena, cohort studies, mens health ALTHOUGH common and associated with reduced quality of life and increased health care expenditure, 1 there are only limited data relating to the outcome of lower urinary tract symptoms in men over time. 25 While Abbreviations and Acronyms BPH benign prostatic hyperplasia CV coefficient of variance HDL high-density lipoprotein LUTS lower urinary tract symptoms OSA obstructive sleep apnea Accepted for publication June 4, 2013. Study received Research Ethics Committee approval. Supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Project Grant #627227). * Correspondence: Freemasons Foundation Centre for Mens Health, University of Adelaide, Lv. 6, Eleanor Harrald Bldg, Frome Rd., Adelaide, S.A., 5000, South Australia, Australia (telephone: 61 [8] 8222 5502; FAX: 61 [8] 8223 3870; e-mail: gary.wittert@adelaide.edu.au). See Editorial on page 15. 130 j www.jurology.com 0022-5347/14/1911-0130/0 THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
2014 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, INC.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.018 Vol. 191, 130-137, January 2014 Printed in U.S.A. usually assumed to worsen, LUTS may also improve. 3,6 A number of risk factors and health conditions other than age and BPH associate with LUTS in men, 7 suggesting that the lower urinary tract is susceptible to systemic inuences outside of the prostate. Furthermore, these associations vary according to specic clusters of urinary symptoms. 8 In a study of elderly men from the MrOS (Osteoporotic Fractures in Men) Study with clini- cally signicant LUTS at baseline, more than a quarter reported signicant symptom improvement at followup. 3 In an earlier study of Swedish men 45 to 99 years old, 20.2% and 9.5% had remitting uri- nary incontinence and overactive bladder, respec- tively, although only an overall symptom score was obtained. 4 Few studies have simultaneously exam- ined the contribution of multiple risk factors to the progression or improvement of specic symptom clusters in men. In this study we determined the prevalence, incidence and improvements of storage and voiding LUTS in a population based cohort of men with detailed psychosocial, health related and behavioral assessments during 5 years. We tested the hypoth- esis that the onset and course of LUTS are deter- mined, at least in part, by potentially remediable factors. METHODS Study Design and Sampling Data were obtained from the FAMAS (Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study), a population based study of randomly selected men from the northern and western suburbs of Adelaide, Australia. 9 A total of 1,620 men 35 to 80 years old at recruitment completed a telephone inter- view (sample response rate 67.8%) and 1,195 attended a clinic visit (T1, clinic response rate 45.1%) between 2002 and 2005. Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants. All protocols were approved by the Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Ethics Committee, with funding currently provided through the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Project Grant #627227). Comparisons to the 2001 Australian Census data showed that FAMAS participants matched the population for most key demographics, although younger groups and never married men were underrepresented and older participants were overrepresented. 9 Followup clinic visits using identical protocols were conducted between 2007 and 2010 (T2, 899), as near was practical to 5 years after the initial visit (mean followup 5.0 0.2 years). Comparison to the 2006 Australian Census data showed that FAMAS participants were more likely to be older, married and have a higher level of post-secondary school education. 10 Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms The 7-item AUA-SI was used to evaluate the presence of LUTS. Subjects were classied as having storage symptoms if the sum of the score on AUA-SI items 2, 4 and 7 was 4 or greater (and the score on item 4, urgency, was 1 or greater), and as having voiding symptoms if the sum of the score on AUA-SI items 1, 3, 5 and 6 was 5 or greater. Subjects were classied as having mild, moderate or severe LUTS if the total LUTS score was 0 to 7, 8 to 19, or 20 to 35, respectively. Given the absence of standard- ized denitions for LUTS progression and improvement, we dened these outcomes based on previous studies 3 and AUA management guidelines. 11 Men who reported an increase in AUA-SI score for voiding symptoms of 3 or more and for storage symptoms 2 or more were classied as having voiding and storage LUTS progression, respectively. Men who reported a decrease in AUA-SI score for voiding symptoms of 3 or less and for storage symptoms 2 or less were classied as having voiding and storage LUTS improvement, respectively (with a 2 to 2 and 1 to 1-point absolute changes in voiding and storage symptoms classied as stable). Demographic Factors, Health Status and Medication Use Information on age, education, and marital, occupational, smoking and disease status was obtained by self-report questionnaire. 9 Medication use was determined by self- report and data linkage with a national medication registry. The presence of depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-1A 12 ) or a report of physician diagnosed depression and/or use of antidepres- sant medication. The probability of obstructive sleep apnea was determined using a multivariate prediction equation. 13 Plasma Assays Morning fasting venous blood samples were obtained by venipuncture at clinic and stored at 80C. Serum total testosterone was measured by validated stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrom- etry (interassay CV 9.3% at 0.43 nmol/l, 8.6% at 1.66 nmol/l, 4.0% at 8.17 nmol/l) as was estradiol (E 2 ) (interassay CV 14% at 23 pmol/l, 4.0% at 83 pmol/l, 6.0% at 408 pmol/l). HDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides were measured enzymatically using a Hitachi 911 (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany; interassay CV triglyceride 3%, total cholesterol 2.3%, HDL 6.7% and low-density lipoprotein 3.7%). Plasma glucose was determined using an automated chemistry analyzer system (Olympus AU5400, interassay CV 2.5% at 3.5 mmol/l and 3.0% at 19.6 mmol/l). Glycated hemo- globin (HbA1c) was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography using a spherical cation exchange gel (CV 2% at 6% of total hemoglobin). Body Composition Anthropometric measures, blood pressure, grip strength and body composition (by dual energy x-ray absorptiom- etry) were obtained as previously published. 9 Statistical Analysis In the present study only men who had completed the AUA-SI at T1 and T2 (822) were included in the study. Men with a history of bladder cancer (8) or prostate cancer (17) or prostate surgery (12) and those with a current RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS 131 self-reported urinary tract infection (5), were excluded from the analysis. In total, 780 men were included in the nal analytic sample (g. 1). There were no signicant demographic differences between men at T1 and T2. For the multinomial logistic regression models, independents were rst selected on the basis of demonstrated or sus- pected associations with the outcome. Those predictors with a univariate association with the outcome variable of p 0.1 were then adjusted for age and included in the nal regression model only if they demonstrated an age adjusted association with p 0.1. To determine the effect of selected medication classes (a-blockers, anticholinergics, diuretics, 5a-reductase inhibitors) on the nal model, a sensitivity analysis was performed using sequential logistic regression to test for signicant changes to the observed regression coefcients for men taking selected medications at baseline only (model 1) or at followup (model 2). All data were analyzed using PASW Statis- tics 19.0. RESULTS Study Population The supplementary table (http://jurology.com/) details the characteristics of participants at each point. At followup the mean total AUA-SI score was approximately 0.5 points higher, and the degree of bother for storage or voiding LUTS did not change, but mean plasma prostate specic antigen concen- tration increased. LUTS Prevalence Between baseline and followup visits the proportion of men who reported mild LUTS decreased from 81.9% to 74.5% while the proportion who reported moderate (15.6% to 22.7%) and severe symptoms (2.5% to 5.3%) increased (table 1). Increases in moderate symptoms occurred in all but the oldest age group, where it was the severe symptoms that increased. The proportion of men reporting signicant storage (AUA-SI score 4 or greater) and voiding (AUA-SI score 5 or greater) LUTS increased to 34.6% (from 27.5%) and 17.7% (from 13.1%), respectively. There was an age related increase in both types of LUTS with time. LUTS Improvement and Progression Storage LUTS remained stable (1 to 1-point ab- solute change in storage symptom AUA-SI score) between visits in 27% (209), improved (change in AUA-SI score of 2 or less) in 33.1% (256) and pro- gressed (change in AUA-SI score of 2 or more) in 39.8% (308) of men. Voiding symptoms remained stable (2 to 2-point absolute change in voiding symptom AUA-SI score) in 44.0% (344), improved (change in AUA-SI score of 3 or less) in 23.4% (181) and progressed (change in AUA-SI score of 3 or more) in 32.3% (250) of men (g. 2). The baseline predictors of change in storage and voiding LUTS from the multi-adjusted models are shown in gures 3 and 4. Being widowed, sedentary, having lower plasma HDL cholesterol and higher estradiol, OSA risk and the use of a-blockers at baseline increased the likelihood of storage symp- tom improvement and decreased that of progres- sion. Greater urinary bother, lower triglycerides, greater sexual desire and use of anticholinergics were associated with improvement in symptoms. Greater abdominal fat mass, lower income and a diagnosis of depression were associated with pro- gression of storage LUTS (g. 3). Older age, urinary bother, being widowed, being sedentary, lower Figure 1. CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram of analytic sample of cohort of Australian men. Table 1. Prevalence of total, storage and voiding LUTS Age Group % Mild LUTS (No.) % Moderate LUTS (No.) % Severe LUTS (No.) % Storage LUTS (No.) % Voiding LUTS (No.) Baseline: 35e39 86.3 (69) 12.5 (10) 1.3 (1) 22.5 (18) 6.3 (5) 40e49 87.4 (216) 10.9 (27) 1.5 (4) 22.7 (56) 8.9 (22) 50e59 87.7 (229) 10.7 (28) 1.5 (4) 23.7 (62) 9.2 (24) 60e69 75.6 (99) 21.4 (28) 3.1 (4) 29.0 (38) 20.5 (27) 70e80 72.4 (42) 22.4 (13) 5.2 (3) 39.7 (23) 20.7 (12) 81e85 Overall 81.9 (655) 15.6 (106) 2.5 (16) 27.5 (197) 13.1 (90) Followup: 35e39 40e49 81.3 (65) 18.8 (15) 0.5 (1) 31.6 (25) 11.3 (9) 50e59 85.8 (212) 13.0 (32) 2.3 (5) 21.5 (53) 11.4 (28) 60e69 79.1 (208) 18.6 (49) 4.8 (6) 33.0 (86) 16.1 (42) 70e80 71.2 (94) 23.5 (31) 7.3 (11) 43.5 (57) 16.8 (22) 81e85 55.2 (32) 39.7 (23) 9.2 (14) 43.1 (25) 32.8 (19) Overall 74.5 (611) 22.7 (150) 5.3 (37) 34.6 (246) 17.7 (120) Participants with missing values were not included in the study (16, 12, 8, 14 and 10 for mild, moderate, severe, storage and voiding LUTS at baseline, and 13, 8, 3, 11 and 7 for mild, moderate, severe storage and voiding LUTS at followup, respectively). 132 RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS plasma testosterone, a diagnosis of BPH and using 5a-reductase inhibitors were associated with a greater likelihood of improvement and a lower likelihood of progression of voiding symptoms. Lower household income, lower plasma HDL cholesterol, higher estradiol, a diagnosis of depression and Figure 2. Change in voiding and storage LUTS in cohort of Australian men during baseline (2002 to 2005) and followup (2007 to 2010) clinic visits. Progression was dened as new reports of signicant symptoms from T1 to T2 for storage (4 or more) and voiding (5 or more) LUTS, and LUTS remission was dened as disappearance of signicant symptoms from T1 to T2. Figure 3. Final multi-adjustedmodels for progressionor improvement of storage LUTSincludingrange of social, lifestyle andbiomedical variables. Data represent ORs with 95% CIs. Independent variables with univariate association with dependent of p 0.1 were included in nal models if age adjusted association had p 0.1. Listed ORs represent likelihood of symptom improvement (blue bars) or progression (red bars) at 5-year clinic for storage LUTS for each variable listed (referent category stable LUTS). For each categorical factor, referent category appears on OR 1 line. OR to left of line indicates less likely to occur whereas OR to right indicates more likely. For each continuous variable ORs represent change in likelihood of symptom improvement or progression per SD increase. Some variables were predictors of improvement and regression. Abdo. FM, abdominal fat mass. Sep./Div., separated/divorced. IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. DEXA, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. NPAS, National Physical Activity Society. RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS 133 erectile dysfunction at baseline were associated with the progression of voiding symptoms (g. 4). Effect of Pharmacotherapy on LUTS Tables 2 and 3 show the relationships between the use of medications for LUTS at baseline and followup, and changes in LUTS. Storage LUTS were more likely to improve and less likely to progress in men who continued to take or were commenced on a-blockers and anticholinergics at followup (table 2). Voiding LUTS were more likely to improve in men who had commenced 5a-reductase inhibitors at followup, and were less likely to progress in those who continued to take or commenced 5a-reductase inhibitors (table 3). DISCUSSION Overall we observed an age dependent increase in the severity of LUTS during the 5-year followup consistent with previous studies. 24,6 In the Olmsted County Study of similar age men the mean AUA-SI increased at 42 months, but notably some men experienced improvement. 5 In a subsequent analysis of Olmsted County men combined with men from the Flint Mens Health Study, 14 49.2% and 38.2% of men had increasing and decreasing symptom severity, respectively, but storage and voiding symptoms were not examined separately. In a multicenter Scottish survey of men age 40 to 79 years, 15 improvement in storage and voiding symptoms occurred in half as many men compared to the current study. This nding is likely due to the exclusion from the baseline sample of a center with higher symptom scores (due to methodological dif- ferences). The observation that men with greater urinary bother at baseline were more likely to report voiding dysfunction at followup is consistent with the ndings of previous studies. 1 In cross-sectional studies physical activity has been shown to be protective against the develop- ment of LUTS, 16 and recent longitudinal data from the MrOS cohort have conrmed the protective effect of physical activity on LUTS. 17 We have further shown that a high level of physical activity predicts the improvement and protects from the progression of storage and voiding LUTS. Widowhood was associated with a greater likeli- hood of progression, and decreased the likelihood of improvement of storage and voiding LUTS. This nding adds to the range of conditions associated with widowhood, including erectile dysfunction, Figure 4. Final multi-adjusted models for progression or improvement of voiding LUTS including range of social, lifestyle and biomedical variables. Data represent ORs with 95% CIs. Independent variables with univariate association with dependent of p 0.1 were included in nal models if age adjusted association had p 0.1. Listed ORs represent likelihood of symptom improvement (blue bars) or progression (red bars) at 5-year clinic for voiding LUTS for each variable listed (referent category stable LUTS). For each categorical factor, referent category appears on OR 1 line. OR to left of line indicates less likely to occur whereas OR to right indicates more likely. For each continuous variable ORs represent change in likelihood of symptom improvement or progression per SD increase. Some variables were predictors of improvement and regression. Sep./Div., separated/divorced. IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. NPAS, National Physical Activity Society. 134 RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS diabetes and depression. 18 Accordingly, particular vigilance is required in assessing and treating men who have lost a spouse. Data from cross-sectional 19 and longitudinal 20 studies demonstrate an association between depres- sion and LUTS in men. Similarly we found that depression is associated with an increased risk of LUTS progression, an effect independent of other lifestyle and medical factors. Furthermore, we showed that the presence of depression at baseline (dened with self-report, BDI score and/or antide- pressant use) preceded the progression of storage and voiding symptoms. Although low HDL cholesterol is an established risk factor for BPH, 16 our study remains the rst to our knowledge to demonstrate an association between lower HDL cholesterol and the cluster of voiding-type symptoms. Similarly, while there has been some limited evidence suggesting a link between triglycerides and, specically, overactive bladder in clinical samples, 21 our nding of a decreased likelihood of storage LUTS improvement in men with high triglycerides at baseline is consistent with the notion that storage LUTS may be a component of the metabolic syndrome. 8 Sleep disorders have recently been recognized as a potential risk factor for LUTS. 22 Our previous analyses 8 and those of others 23 have suggested an independent relationship between OSA and LUTS. We found that higher OSA risk at baseline was associated with an increased likelihood of storage LUTS progression at followup. This observation is consistent with the relationship between OSA and the metabolic syndrome, with signicant improve- ment in AUA-SI after continuous positive airway pressure therapy for 3 months in older men. 24 Table 2. Effect of LUTS medications at baseline and followup on storage LUTS changes (AUA-SI) LUTS Medications Multivariate Storage LUTS Improvement* Multivariate Storage LUTS Progression* % (No.) OR 95% CI p Value R 2 Change OR 95% CI p Value R 2 Change Lower Upper Lower Upper a-Blockers: Baseline 9.7 (75) 1.82 1.59 2.22 0.003 0.44 0.28 0.79 0.039 / 5.0 (39) 1.94 0.89 3.07 0.191 0.08 0.31 0.16 1.23 0.341 0.16 / 4.7 (36) 1.71 1.38 2.26 0.041 0.13 0.59 0.20 1.09 0.061 0.20 / 3.5 (27) 2.11 1.42 3.01 0.012 0.16 0.49 0.18 0.79 0.038 0.11 / 86.8 (672) Ref Ref Anticholinergics: Baseline 5.1 (39) 2.69 1.99 3.74 0.038 / 1.6 (12) 3.22 0.81 5.72 0.527 0.10 / 3.5 (27) 2.11 1.32 4.01 0.038 0.20 / 7.0 (54) 3.42 1.65 5.21 0.009 0.22 / 87.9 (678) Ref Data presented are OR (95% CI) from binomial regression of storage LUTS improvement and progression (referent category stable storage LUTS). Medication classes were selected on the basis of an independent effect on storage LUTS improvement or progression (fig. 3), and listed as baseline predictors and by changes at followup. Medication use assessed through Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme linkage and/or self-report. *Regression models were also controlled for bother with urinary symptoms, abdominal fat mass, household income, marital status, physical activity, serum HDL, triglyceride and estradiol, depression and solitary sexual desire. Model fit was assessed through use of pseudo R 2 (Nagelkerke). R 2 change refers to the overall fit for the final models, and was storage LUTS improvement (0.34) and progression (0.55). Table 3. Effect of LUTS medication at baseline and followup on voiding LUTS changes (AUA-SI) % (No.) Multivariate Voiding LUTS Improvement* Multivariate Voiding LUTS Progression* OR 95% CI p Value R 2 Change OR 95% CI p Value R 2 Change Lower Upper Lower Upper 5a-Reductase inhibitor: Baseline 5.5 (43) 4.01 3.11 4.89 0.003 0.62 0.39 0.79 0.009 / 3.5 (27) 2.67 0.89 5.11 0.382 0.17 0.72 0.11 1.31 0.341 0.11 / 2.0 (15) 2.11 0.09 4.18 0.071 0.07 0.51 0.31 0.88 0.008 0.08 / 3.0 (23) 3.12 0.89 6.01 0.042 0.18 0.58 0.19 0.79 0.028 0.21 / 91.5 (704) Ref Ref Data presented are OR (95% CI) from binomial regression of voiding LUTS improvement and progression (referent category stable voiding LUTS). Medication classes were selected on the basis of an independent effect on voiding LUTS improvement or progression (fig. 3), and listed as baseline predictors and by changes at followup. Medication use was assessed through Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme linkage and/or self-report. *Regression models were also controlled for age category, bother with urinary symptoms, household income, marital status, physical activity, serum HDL, testosterone and estradiol, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction. Model fit was assessed through use of pseudo R 2 (Nagelkerke). The overall fit for the final models was voiding LUTS improvement (0.43) and progression (0.56). RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS 135 Previous studies examining the effect of testos- terone on LUTS have produced positive, 25 nega- tive 26 or equivocal 27 associations. In multivariate models lower plasma testosterone increased the likelihood of voiding LUTS progression, indepen- dent of BPH, arguing against a direct effect of androgens on the pathogenesis of BPH. Higher plasma estradiol was associated with an increase in storage and voiding symptoms, an effect consistent with the emerging role of estradiol in the lower urinary tract of men. 28 The sensitivity analyses show the benet of ongoing use or introduction of a-blockers or anti- cholinergics for storage LUTS in accordance with contemporary urological practice. 11 Similarly the improvement in symptoms of voiding LUTS, the introduction of 5a-reductase inhibitors and the decrease in progression with continued use are consistent with the established effect of these medications. 12 In accordance with the hypothesis we have iden- tied that potentially remediable factors beyond the prostate signicantly affect the progression or remission of LUTS. High levels of physical activity favorably inuenced the outcome of storage and voiding LUTS. In the case of storage LUTS, improvement occurred in men with higher HDL cholesterol and lower triglycerides and OSA risk. In contrast, greater abdominal fat mass and depression increased the risk of storage LUTS progression. The progression of voiding LUTS was predicted by lower serum testosterone, higher estradiol, depression, BPH and erectile dysfunction. The identication of these modiable systemic factors is signicant because of the previous demonstration of improve- ment in LUTS with diet induced weight loss, 29 treatment of OSA by continuous positive airway pressure 24 and increased physical activity. 30 The strengths of this study include the use of a comparatively large, random sample of men from a broad age group, similar in characteristics to men from the general Australian population, 9 a com- prehensive biopsychosocial data set (including the use of a state-of-the-art mass spectrometer to analyze sex hormones), and the use of conservative estimates of remitting, stable and progressing urinary symp- toms for storage and voiding LUTS. The limitations of this study include the availability of 2 time points only, and the reliance on self-reported measures for most chronic conditions and demographic data. CONCLUSIONS Given the high prevalence and burden of LUTS among men age 40 or older, attention should be paid to addressing remediable factors instead of or as an adjunct to specic pharmacotherapy or surgery, not only because of the benet for the symptoms but also because of the potential to reduce overall cardiometabolic risk. REFERENCES 1. Wei JT, Calhoun E and Jacobsen SJ: Urologic Diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2005; 173: 1256. 2. Platz EA, Joshu CE, Mondul AM et al: Incidence and progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in a large prospective cohort of United States men. J Urol 2012; 188: 496. 3. Parsons JK, Wilt TJ, Wang PY et al: Progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men: a community based study. J Urol 2010; 183: 1915. 4. Malmsten UG, Molander U, Peeker R et al: Urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms: a longitu- dinal population-based survey in men aged 45-103 years. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 149. 5. Jacobsen SJ, Girman CJ, Guess HA et al: Nat- ural history of prostatism: longitudinal changes in voiding symptoms in community dwelling men. J Urol 1996; 155: 595. 6. Sarma AV, Jacobsen SJ, Girman CJ et al: Concomitant longitudinal changes in frequency of and bother from lower urinary tract symptoms in community dwelling men. J Urol 2002; 168: 1446. 7. Kok ET, Schouten BW, Bohnen AM et al: Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms sug- gestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a community based population of healthy aging men: the Krimpen Study. J Urol 2009; 181: 710. 8. Martin SA, Haren MT, Marshall VR et al: Prevalence and factors associated with uncom- plicated storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms in community-dwelling Australian men. World J Urol 2011; 29: 179. 9. Martin SA, Haren MT, Middleton SM et al: The Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS): design, procedures & participants. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 126. 10. Grant JF, Martin SA, Taylor AW et al: Cohort profile: the Men Androgen Inflammation Life- style Environment and Stress (MAILES) Study. Int J Epidemiol 2013; Epub ahead of print. 11. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee: AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2003; 170: 530. 12. Beck AT and Beck RW: Screening depressed patients in family practice. A rapid technic. Postgrad Med 1972; 52: 81. 13. Maislin G, Pack AI, Kribbs NB et al: A survey screen for prediction of apnea. Sleep 1995; 18: 158. 14. St Sauver JL, Sarma AV, Hollingsworth JM et al: Associations between modest weight changes and onset and progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in two population-based cohorts. Urology 2011; 78: 437. 15. Lee AJ, Garraway WM, Simpson RJ et al: The natural history of untreated lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged and elderly men over a period of five years. Eur Urol 1998; 34: 325. 16. Parsons JK and Kashefi C: Physical activity, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 1228. 17. Parsons JK, Messer K, White M et al: Obesity increases and physical activity decreases lower urinary tract symptom risk in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men study. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 1173. 136 RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS 18. Barry KL and Fleming MF: Widowhood: a review of the social and medical implications. Fam Med 1988; 20: 413. 19. Cortes E, Sahai A, Pontari M et al: The psy- chology of LUTS: ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 31: 340. 20. Wong SY, Hong A, Leung J et al: Lower urinary tract symptoms and depressive symptoms in elderly men. J Affect Disord 2006; 96: 83. 21. Hong GS, Shim BS, Chung WS et al: Correlation between metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms of males and females in the aspect of gender-specific medicine: a single institutional study. Korean J Urol 2010; 51: 631. 22. Cakir OO and McVary KT: LUTS and sleep dis- orders: emerging risk factor. Curr Urol Rep 2012; 13: 407. 23. Yoshimura K, Oka Y, Kamoto T et al: Differences and associations between nocturnal voiding/ nocturia and sleep disorders. BJU Int 2010; 106: 232. 24. Russo-Magno P, OBrien A, Panciera T et al: Compliance with CPAP therapy in older men with obstructive sleep apnea. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 1205. 25. Chang IH, Oh SY and Kim SC: A possible rela- tionship between testosterone and lower urinary tract symptoms in men. J Urol 2009; 182: 215. 26. Haider A, Gooren LJ, Padungtod P et al: Concurrent improvement of the metabolic syn- drome and lower urinary tract symptoms upon normalisation of plasma testosterone levels in hypogonadal elderly men. Andrologia 2009; 41: 7. 27. Litman HJ, Bhasin S, OLeary MP et al: An investigation of the relationship between sex- steroid levels and urological symptoms: results from the Boston Area Community Health survey. BJU Int 2007; 100: 321. 28. Chavalmane AK, Comeglio P, Morelli A et al: Sex steroid receptors in male human bladder: expression and biological function. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2698. 29. Khoo J, Piantadosi C, Duncan R et al: Comparing effects of a low-energy diet and a high-protein low-fat diet on sexual and endothelial function, urinary tract symptoms, and inflammation in obese diabetic men. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2868. 30. Sea J, Poon KS and McVary KT: Review of exercise and the risk of benign prostatic hyper- plasia. Phys Sportsmed 2009; 37: 75. RISK FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION OR IMPROVEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS 137