0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
52 Ansichten6 Seiten
The first report of spinal headache was in 1899 by August Bier on his own experience. The now infamous %&ooley and 'oe% case of 19() led to the almost virtual abandonment of spinal and epidural techni ues in Britain for more than + decades#+$.
The first report of spinal headache was in 1899 by August Bier on his own experience. The now infamous %&ooley and 'oe% case of 19() led to the almost virtual abandonment of spinal and epidural techni ues in Britain for more than + decades#+$.
The first report of spinal headache was in 1899 by August Bier on his own experience. The now infamous %&ooley and 'oe% case of 19() led to the almost virtual abandonment of spinal and epidural techni ues in Britain for more than + decades#+$.
associated with epidural anaesthesia Holly A. Muir, MD, FR! Department of Anaesthesia, Dalhousie "niversity #$% &race Health entre Halifa', (ova )cotia anada Complications from the use of regional anesthesia have been reported from the onset of its use. The first report of spinal headache was in 1899 by August Bier on his own experience with a spinal anaesthetic performed using a uin!e cut needle. "e also noted a complaint of bac!ache with his experience.#1$ The now infamous %&ooley and 'oe% case of 19() led to the almost virtual abandonment of spinal and epidural techni*ues in Britain for more than + decades#+$. The usual list *uoted to patients regarding ris!s associated with regional anaesthesia include bloc! failure, bac!ache, infection #locali-ed and C./$, headache, accidental intravascular in0ection, inadvertent total spinal, neurologic in0ury #from peripheral nerve in0ury to paralysis$ and death or brain in0ury. As one recites this list, the actual li!elihood of suffering this complication is often not well communicated to the patient. This may reflect a lac! of real comprehension by the informer, but often results from the tendency by the patient to recall only the most sinister of complications. Before we can ma!e an appropriate presentation to their patient on ris! and complication of anaesthesia, we must ma!e an assessment ourselves of the magnitude of the ris!. A report from 1991 loo!ed at malpractice claims filed against anaesthesiologists in a 112year period from 193(2198( #4$. A comparison was made between ob and non2ob claims. A total of 1,()1 cases were reviewed, of which 1+5 were ob2related claims and 885 were non2ob claims. The following comparisons were made regarding the types of in0uries claimed. #Table 1$ *A+,E - % non - ob claim (n=1,351) % ob claims (n=190) % ob-regional (n=124) % ob-general (n=62) Patient death 39(524) 22(41) 12(15) 42(26) eonatal brain damage 20(38) 19(23) 24(15) !eadache 1(10) 12(23) 19(23) 0(0) eonatal death <0.5(1) 9(17) 7(8) 10(6) Pain d"ring anesthesia <0.5(5) 8(16) 13(16) 0(0) Patient ner#e damage 16(209) 8(16) 10(12) 7(4) Patient brain damage 13(174) 7(14) 7(9) 8(5) $motional distress 2(30) 6(12) 7(9) 5(3) %ac& 'ain 1(8) 5(9) 7(9) 0(0) This review demonstrated that patient death, nerve in0ury and brain damage were more common in the non2ob population than the ob population. "owever among the ob population, claims for more trivial events such as headache, pain during anaesthesia, emotional distress and bac! pain were more common. &hen the authors compared anaesthetic techni*ues in the ob group, they found #as would be expected$ that there was a significantly higher number of claims resulting from maternal death in the general anaesthesia group. &hile headache, pain during anaesthesia and bac! pain were more common complaints in the group receiving regional anaesthesia. "ow should we interpret this data6 7a0or complications are more fre*uent in the patients who have general anesthesia than regional anaesthesia. 'is! should be put in the context of options available. 8n the triennial 'eport on Confidential 9n*uiries into 7aternal :eaths in the ;nited <ingdom 198821991, there were ) deaths directly attributable to anaesthesia. #)$ Three of these were a result of pulmonary complication either during or after general anaesthesia. =ne was due to pulmonary complications which occurred after aggressive treatment of hypotension in a patient with an underlying cardiac arrythmia.. Ten deaths were indirectly associated with anaesthesia. .ine were as a result of respiratory insufficiency either due to intraoperative or postoperative complications of general anesthesia and>or post operative pain management. =ne was a result of severe intraoperative haemorrhage which could not be controlled after ) hours of surgery and resuscitative measures. This patient had an epidural anaesthetic and it was felt that the sympathectomy could have contributed to the failure at resuscitative efforts. #)$ &hat is all of this trying to tell us6 8 thin! it should be apparent that, when discussing complications of regional anesthesia with patients, one should not dwell on the fact that death could occur with regional anaesthesia, rather the patient should be made aware that death is more of a ris! when general anaesthesia is used in the pregnant patient. A ma0or category of in0ury which is remembered by patients is the ris! of nerve in0ury. This encompasses a very broad spectrum of in0ury from transient peripheral nerve palsy to paralysis. An analysis of closed claims revealed that nerve in0ury is more li!ely with general anaesthesia than regional anaesthesia #?1 vs 4?5$. #($ ;lnar nerve palsy and brachial plexus in0ury were the most common, followed by lumbosacral nerve root in0ury. &hen one examines the issue of nerve in0ury, we must !eep in mind the high incidence of nerve in0ury associated with obstetrical delivery itself #without the use of epidural bloc!$. The incidence of obstetric related neurologic complication is reported from 1@+111 to 1@?)11.#?$ The types of neurologic in0ury seen, which related to the pregnant state or delivery, are detailed in Table +. *A+,E . (eurolo/ic #n0ury Associated with !re/nancy and Delivery (om'lication )s"al (a"se *ensor+ ,e-icit .otor ,e-icit Prolapsed disc spontaneous occurrence in 1:6000 deliveries variale variale !u"osacral trun# !4$!5 co"pression o% &ead a'ainst sacru"$ &i'&er incidence (it& use o% "id)&i'& %orceps &*poest&esia lateral cal% and %oot (ea# &ip adductor %oot drop (ea# +uad ,e"oral nerve !2$!3$!4 lit&oto"*$ &*peracute &ip %le-ion (it& pus&in' and retractors at .)/ &*poest&esia ant t&i'& and "edial cal%$ asent patellar re%le- +uad paral*sis (it& i"paired #nee e-tension !ateral %e"oral cutaneous !2$!3 lit&oto"* or retractors nu"ness anterolateral t&i'& /ciatic nerve !4$!5$/1$/2$/3 lit&oto"* or 01 in2ection pain %ro" post 'luteal to %oot inailit* to %le- le' 3turator nerve !2$!3$!4 lit&oto"*$ acute %le-ion o% t&i'& &*poest&esia "edial t&i'& inailit* to adduct le' .o""on Peroneal !4$!5$/1$/2 lit&oto"* (it& co"pression o% t&e lateral aspect o% t&e #nee anterolateral cal% and dorsu" o% %oot and toes plantar %le-ion (it& inversion de%or"it* 4drop %oot /ap&enous nerve !2$!3$!4 lit&oto"* position "edial %oot and antero"edial aspect lo(er le' 9pidural anesthesia can be associated with neurologic problems, ranging from headache to paralysis. The in0uries which immediately come to mind include@ prolonged neural bloc!ade, bac!ache, trauma to nerve roots, cauda e*uina syndrome, epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, adhesive arachnoiditis, meningitis and postdural puncture headache. Aoo!ing bac! on the data collected by Chadwic! et al, #4$ it is apparent that the anesthesiologist is more li!ely to be involved in a suit for a minor in0ury than a ma0or in0ury. =ne should therefore be prepared to discuss these minor issues with their patients. The incidence of bac! pain following epidural bloc! continues to be an area of controversy. "eadache has also been identified as a complication associated with high ris! of suit. The ris! of accidental dural puncture #A:B$ depends on the s!ill of the operator. A rate of 15 is generally *uoted. :irect trauma to the spinal cord after epidural anesthesia for labor would be very rare, as the epidural space is usually entered below the conus medullaris. 8n 915 of adults, the cord ends above the second lumbar vertebrae. "owever, in 115 of adults, it extends to the third lumbar vertebrae. .erve root trauma has been reported in 1.135 of patients after epidural anesthesia. Bain and>or paraesthesia during needle placement, or in0ection of medication, usually warn of ris! for in0ury and should be acted upon. 7ore catastrophic nerve in0ury has been reported. These have been in association with epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, adhesive arachnoiditis, anterior spinal artery syndrome or cauda e*uina syndrome. &hen one discusses these complications, it is important to !eep in perspective their very low incidence. 9pidural abscess has been reported in a fre*uency of 1@(1(,111 patients who had epidurals. #The incidence is +@11,111 in patients without regional anesthesia.$#1+$ Anterior spinal artery syndrome is the conse*uence of decreased arterial supply to the cord and results in motor wea!ness, or paralysis and loss of pain and temperature sensation. 8n approximately 1(5 of the population the artery of Adam!iewic- originates from as high as the T( level. 8n this population the conus medularis is supplied by branches from the internal iliac artery. 8t is postulated that there may be an increased ris! of cord ischemia due to fetal head compression of the branches of the internal iliac artery. Cauda e*uina syndrome and adhesive arachnoiditis share a common etiology 2 chemical toxicity. Cauda e*uina syndrome has been reported as a conse*uence of local anesthetic toxicity. 'ecently, controversy has arisen over the use of hyberbaric (5 lidocaine for spinal anesthesiaC however, lidocaine in the epidural space still appears to be safe.#1)$ 9pidural hematoma is a complication which we learn about early in our career and many spend a great deal of time fearing someday they will see one. The actual incidence of epidural hematoma is un!nown. 8t is reported to occur spontaneously in patients who have not received regional anaesthesia #1?$ and in patients who have received regional anesthesia #13$,#18$ 8n a review of the literature from 191?2199) by Dandermeulen et al. identified ?1 cases of spinal2 epidural hematoma, )? of which were associated with epidural anesthesia. Twenty three of the )? epidural cases were associated with the use of anticoagulants, ) were associated with thrombocytopenia and the remaining 19 cases had no ris! factors reported. Eive of these cases were in pregnant women. Two of these were reported to have thrombocytopenia, 1 had an epidural ependymona and + had no identifiable ris! factors. 'is! factors for epidural hematoma have included difficult or bloody tap, pre existing coagulopathy and use of anti coagulants. The ris! of a bloody tap in the obstetric population has been reported to be as high as 185. Thrombocytopenia is identified as a ris! factor, however the platelet count below which it is ris!y to use regional anesthesia is still somewhat controversial. 8n the review by =wens et al #13$ no patients were identified with hematoma and a platelet count F(1,111 in those whom thrombocytopenia was considered a ris! factor. Current dogma uses a platelet count F111,111 as the safe threshold. "owever many experienced anaesthesiologist would challenge this. &hen *uestioning the use of regional anesthesia for fear of epidural hematoma one must always consider the ris!s of alternate treatments #general anesthesia$ and the benefits regional anesthesia may afford the mother and fetus. 8nfection or meningitis as a complication is rare as well. Concern in obstetric practice has focus around the use of regional bloc! anaesthesia in the presence of maternal chorioamnionitis. Aaboratory studies suggest that if the C/E is entered after systemic administration of antibiotic that ris! of contamination with bacteria is nil. #19$ The use of epidural anesthesia>analgesia has become the standard of care in obstetrical practice. As with any adventure in life it can be associated with complications. Eortunately the incidence of serious complication with epidural anesthesia is rare in experienced hands. They do however occur even with the most experienced and good intentioned practitioner. The ris!s of general anaesthesia in obstetrics are well documented. #+1$ =ne must temper these ris! against the potential complications associated with epidural anaesthesia in your discussion with the patient. 8n 19() Aord Gustice :enning in his 0udgement of the &ooley and 'oe case made a very insightful comment on complications of medical procedures. H&e should be doing a disservice to the community at large if we were to impose liability on hospitals and doctors for everything that happens to go wrong. &e must insist on due care for the patient at every point, but we must not condemn as negligence that which is only a misadventure.H #+$ 8t is unfortunate that today%s legal community are not as forgiving. REFERE(E) 1. ,in# 5 6. 7istor* o% 8eural 5loc#ade. 0n: .ousins 19$ 5ridenau'& P3 (:ds): 8eural 5loc#ade$ 95 !ippincott$ P&iladelp&ia 1988. +. Cope '&. The &ooley and 'oe Case. Anaesthesia 199(C(1@1?+2134. 4. Chadwic! et al. A comparison of obstetric and non2obstetric anesthesia malpractice claims. Anesthesiology 1991C3)@+)+29. ). 7etters G/ et al eds. 'eport on Confidential 9n*uiries into 7aternal :eaths in the ;nited <ingdom 198821991. Aondon "7/=199) (. <roll et al. .erve in0ury associated with anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1991C34@+1+23 ?. 'osenbaum 'B, et al. Bheripheral nerve and neuromuscular disorders. .eurologic Clinics 199)C 1+#4$@)?12)38$ 3. 7acarthur C et al. 9pidural anaesthesia and long term bac!ache after childbirth. Br 7ed G 1991C411@921+ 8. Breen T&, et al. Eactors associated with bac! pain after childbirth. Anesthesiology 199)C81@+924). 9. 7ac:onald '. A dural puncture rate of 15 is unacceptable in epidural practice. Controversies in =bstetric Anaesthesia. 8nternational Gournal of =bstetric Anaesthesia 199)C4C(12(1. 11. .orris 7C, et al. .eedle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent dural puncture. Anesthesiology 1989C31@3+9241. 11. .orris 7C, et al. Complications of labor analgesia@ epidural verses combined spinal epidural techni*ues. Anesth Analg 199)C39@(+9243. 1+. "lavin 7A, et al. /pinal epidural abscess@ a ten year perspective. .eurology 1991C+3@133. 14. Bromage, B'. .eurologic complications of regional anaesthesia for obstetrics. 8n@ /hnider /. and Aevinson I #9ds$@ Anesthesia for =bstetrics. &illiams and &il!ins, Baltimore, 1994C)442(4. 1). deGong, '". Aast round for a heavy weight6 Anesth Analg 199)C38@42). 1(. Eu!uda T et al. ;nintentional epidural administration of thiamyal. 'eg Anesth 199)C19@4?1. 1? /cott BB. /pinal epidural hematoma.GA7A 193?C+4(@(14. 13. =wens 9A et al. /pinal subarachnoid hematoma after lumbar puncture and heparini-ation@ A case report, review of the literature, and discussion of anesthetic implications. Anesth Analg 198?C?(@1+1123. 18. Dandermeulen 9B et al. Anticoagulants and spinal epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 199)C39@11?(233. 19. Carp " et al. The association between meningitis and dural puncture in bacteremic rats. Anesthesiology 199+C3?@349. +1. Daddadi A et al. 9pidural anesthesia in women with chorioamnionitis@ a retrospective study Anesthesiology 1989C31@A8?4 +1 7uir ". Ieneral anaesthesia for obstetrics, is it obsolete6 Can G Anaesth 199)C)1@'+12+(. 1Dr Holly Muir, -223. !rinted copies can 4e made for non5profit educational use. 6ther use re7uires permission from the author. 85Dec523, Revised 35Mar529 "R,: www.oyston.com:anaes:local:muir.html