0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
31 Ansichten3 Seiten
A four point analysis on Steve Spielberg's 2012 film "Lincoln", grounded on perspectives on Public Administrative theories that aim to gauge the political and Public Administrative ramifications that are within the historical context of the film but firmly and soundly resonate even in contemporary settings of public policy and governance.
A four point analysis on Steve Spielberg's 2012 film "Lincoln", grounded on perspectives on Public Administrative theories that aim to gauge the political and Public Administrative ramifications that are within the historical context of the film but firmly and soundly resonate even in contemporary settings of public policy and governance.
A four point analysis on Steve Spielberg's 2012 film "Lincoln", grounded on perspectives on Public Administrative theories that aim to gauge the political and Public Administrative ramifications that are within the historical context of the film but firmly and soundly resonate even in contemporary settings of public policy and governance.
Lincolns Democracy: A Four Point Analysis on the Spielbergs Lincoln through
the Lens of Contemporary Public Administrative Theories
1. The main conflict of Lincoln is centered on the main predicament of the period in which it is set which is the passing of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America which would abolish slavery and involuntary servitude in all areas of the United States. This amendment would guarantee the freedom of all slaves still held in involuntary service in any state recognizing the authority of the Federal government. This amendment follows the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 which officially freed all slaves in the rebelling states that would soon be the components of the Confederate States of America. This proclamation was passed as a war measure and instated through executive powers in the form of an Executive Order with Lincoln acting as commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces. Because of these characteristics of the Proclamation, Lincoln felt that it would be insufficient in achieving the grander political goal of abolishing slavery in America. The proclamation was vulnerable to being junked by US courts after the state of war and it was also lacking in the sense that it did not encompass all territories of the United States. Thus, the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment was essential in attaining Lincolns ultimate goal.
2. There were several obstacles to the resolution of this conflict. One main problem was the possibility of the Amendment being defeated in the House by representatives of returning slave states if the Amendment were to be passed after the end of the war. Because of this, Lincoln rushed the passage since the end of the war was already seen as looming. The idea of victory as a close eventuality also brought hesitance upon several representatives of the Union because they saw that the assurance of victory over the Confederacy should be the priority. Another problem is the lack of unity of the Republican Party in terms of when the Amendment should be passed and over the finer, more contentious details that it proposes. To solve this, Lincoln called upon Francis Preston Blair, founder of the Republican Party, for support. In exchange for his support, Lincoln approved the sending of a delegation for negotiations for peace between the two sides which was contentious among the Radical Republicans because of their adamant opposition to negotiations. Also, the support of the Democratic Party was also necessary in ensuring the majority vote for the passage of the amendment.
3. To solve the problem of the Amendment being defeated by representatives of returning slave states, Lincoln and his administration and his supporters rushed the passage of the Amendment. For this to be done, they employed a strategy of dealing with both internal and external problems, i.e., hindrances to the amendment internally among members of the Republican Party and externally among members of the Democratic Party. Externally, they targeted the lame duck Democrats, those who have failed to be reelected, by offering them Federal positions in Lincolns next term. This was achieved through indirect means by use of agents that would secretly strike deals with these representatives. Internally, Lincoln sought to unify the Republican Party by seeking the support of party founder Francis Preston Blair. As a condition, however, Blair wanted the go-signal from Lincoln to start negotiations with the Confederates. Since Lincoln would lose support from the Radical Republicans because of his approving negotiations, he sought to keep this information from them.
4. Lincolns methods on solving the problem through partite methods emphasize the partite nature of American politics, and is thus highly commendable because of its recognition of the general political atmosphere and structures to achieve the goal of passing the amendment. In gaining support of the lame-duck democrats, his use of Federal positions as a bargaining chips seems to me very destructive of democratic processes and highlights the Jacksonian, pre- Pendleton Act political atmosphere of the time. His use of Francis Preston Blair, a unifying figure in Republican politics is also highly commendable. However, the withdrawal of information from other members of the House was again potentially destructive of democratic processes, but this ultimately emphasizes the goal- oriented politics of Lincoln. Thus we might say that Lincolns pursuit of understanding political mechanisms and the grander political environment of the time is a crucial tool in understanding the workings of politics to achieve a goal.