0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
22 Ansichten3 Seiten
This document discusses key differences between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes. For mala in se crimes, criminal intent is an element and good faith can be a valid defense. Degree of participation and accomplishment are taken into account. For mala prohibita crimes, criminal intent is not required but the act must be done voluntarily and intelligently. Good faith cannot be used as a defense. All participants are punished equally regardless of their role.
This document discusses key differences between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes. For mala in se crimes, criminal intent is an element and good faith can be a valid defense. Degree of participation and accomplishment are taken into account. For mala prohibita crimes, criminal intent is not required but the act must be done voluntarily and intelligently. Good faith cannot be used as a defense. All participants are punished equally regardless of their role.
This document discusses key differences between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes. For mala in se crimes, criminal intent is an element and good faith can be a valid defense. Degree of participation and accomplishment are taken into account. For mala prohibita crimes, criminal intent is not required but the act must be done voluntarily and intelligently. Good faith cannot be used as a defense. All participants are punished equally regardless of their role.
Nature Wrong from its very nature Wrong because it is prohibited
by law Good faith as defence Valid defence unless the crime is result of culpa Cannot be used as defence Whether criminal intent is an element Criminal intent is an element Criminal intent is immaterial but requires intelligence and voluntariness Degree of accomplishment Degree of accomplishment is taken into account Gives rise to a crime when that crime is consummated Mitigating and aggravating circumstances Taken into account for imposing penalty M&A are not taken into account Degree of participation When there is more than one offender, the degree of participation of each in the commission is taken into account.
Degree of participation is generally not taken into account. All who participated in the act are punished to the same extent.
Stage of accomplishment Penalty is computed on the basis of whether he is a principal offender or merely an accomplice or accessory
Penalty on offenders is same whether they acted as mere accomplices or accessories
Laws violated Penal laws Special penal laws
2) Utilitarian Theory Primary purpose: Protection of society from actual or potential wrongdoers. Classical Theory Primary purpose: Retribution. Basis of criminal liability: Human free will. Endeavored to establish a mechanical and direct proportion between crime and penalty; there is scant regard to human element. Positivist Theory Primary purpose: Reformation; prevention/ correction.
3) Eclectic/Mixed Combines both positivist and classical thinking. The Revised Penal Code today follows the mixed or eclectic philosophy. Crimes that are economic and social by nature should be dealt with in a positivist manner; thus, the law is more compassionate. Heinous crimes should be dealt with in a classical manner; thus, capital punishment.
4) Intraterritorial refers to the application of the RPC within the Philippine territory (land, air and water). Exception Extraterritorial refers to the application of the Revised Penal Code outside the Philippine territory. 5) FRENCH RULE: It is the flag or nationality of the vessel which determines jurisdiction UNLESS the crime violates the peace and order of the host country. ENGLISH RULE: the location or situs of the crime determines jurisdiction UNLESS the crime merely relates to internal management of the vessel. 6) The penal law of the country is binding on all persons who live or sojourn in Philippine territory, subject to the principles of public international law and to treaty stipulations 7) Acts or omissions will only be subject to a penal law if they are committed AFTER a penal law has taken effect. Conversely, acts or omissions which have been committed before the effectivity of a penal law could not be penalized by such penal law. 8) Whenever a penal law is to be construed or applied and the law admits of two interpretations - one lenient to the offender and one strict to the offender, that interpretation which is lenient or favorable to the offender will be adopted. 9) a legislative act that inflicts punishment without trial, its essence being the substitution of legislative fiat for a judicial determination of guilt. 10) El Que Es Causa De La Causa Es Causa Del Mal Causado He who is the cause of the cause is the cause of the evil caused. He who commits an intentional felony is responsible for all the consequences which may naturally and logically result therefrom, whether foreseen or intended or He who commits an intentional felony is responsible for all the consequences which may naturally and logically result therefrom, whether foreseen or intended or not. 11) Ex post facto law : Makes criminal an act done before the passage of the law and which was innocent when done, and punishes such an act. Aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed Changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law annexed to the crime when committed; Alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes conviction upon less or different testimony than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense; Assumes to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes penalty or deprivation of a right for something which when done was lawful; and Deprives a person accused of a crime some lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnesty.