Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
sw
di
w
L/2
L/2
.25wL
.25wL
.50wL
Flexible
sw
w
L/2
L/2
.333wL
.333wL
.333wL
Ri gi d - Al l Wal l s I dent i c al
Rigid (no
Torsion)
w
L/2
L/2
2K
2K
K
Stiffness
.25wL
.25wL
.50wL
Flexible
Rigid (no
Torsion)
.40wL
.40wL
.20wL
Fl ex i bl e v. Ri gi d
Prescribed Rigid Wood Diaphragms
(IBC 2305.2.5)
Torsion Effects
Shear Transfer from Roof Diaphragm -
to Shearwall
2012 IRC
Roof Framing
Force Transfer from
Diaphragm to Shearwall
F
B C
G
Overturning of Shearwalls Shearwall Hold-Down Anchors
Holddown
Anchor
Holddown
Anchor
Low-slip fasteners
Pre-deformed base
A plus in seismic loading
Holddown
Anchor
Multi-story apps.
Self-tightening
A plus in taller
structures
Continuous Threaded Rod
Timbers carry
Compression forces
at holddown
Overturning Forces
Only 0.6 x design dead load can be used to resist
overturning from wind or earthquake (IBC
1605.3, ASCE 7 Sec. 2.4)
Shear Wall Capacity
Based on:
Specific nail
size and
spacing
requirements
APA wood
structural
panels of
specific grade
and thickness
Specific
stud species
anchor bolts
Hold-down
anchors
Shearwall Minimum Aspect Ratios
w = h/3.5 for wind
w = h/2 for seismic
exception: 3.5:1 can be
used with penalty (2w/h)
h
w
40% Increase for Wind Capacity - 2006 IBC 2306.3.2
and 2306.4.1
The current shear wall and diaphragm tables
are based on a 2.8 min. safety factor
Code authors agreed that a 2.0 safety factor is
adequate due to confidence in wind load
accuracy - thus a 40% increase in tabulated
values
Summing Shear Capacities of Dissimilar
Materials
Section 2305.3.8
For wind design, adding the gypsum capacity on
the inside face of wall is allowed
How about composite action using
Adhesives?
Theoretically possible!
But true composite action requires rigid structural
adhesive.
Rigid structural adhesives are not suitable for field
application.
(Construction adhesives creep under load and do not
give 100% composite action.)
Wind v. Seismic
Shear Walls
Wind Design:
40% increased capacity
Gypsum strength can be added
3.5:1 max. aspect ratio
Seismic Design:
Requires 3x framing more often (SDC D-F)
2:1 max. aspect ratio without penalty
3.5:1 permitted with penalty (2w/h)
Wind v. Seismic
Shear Walls
Given:
7/16 OSB
8d common
3 / 6 edge/field nail
spacing
Gypsum on opposite face
H H
v
V
8
2.25
Wind v. Seismic
Shear Walls
Wind Capacity:
V=(450 plf x 1.4+100 plf) x 2.25 =1640 lb
Length of wall
WSP capacity from table
40% increase for wind
For gypsum from table
When less than 2:1 aspect ratio, 2w/h
adjustment
Seismic Capacity:
V=450 plf x 2(2.25)/8 x 2.25 =570 lb
Site-Built Portal Frame
Bracing Methods
St ur d-I -Fr ame w i t h Hol d Dow ns
Ref er enc e: APA Repor t TT-100
Overdriven Fasteners
Overdriven Fasteners
APA Recommendations
If <20% fasteners overdriven by <1/8", then they may be ignored.
If >20% fasteners overdriven by >1/8", then:
Prescriptive add 1 additional fastener for every 2 overdriven
Mechanics based re-analyze capacity based on average
thickness of panel measured from the bottom of the nail head. (5/8"
panel with fasteners overdriven by 1/8" =capacity of 1/2" panel.)
Reference Publication: APA Technical Topics: Power-
Driven Fastener Considerations, (Form TT-056, 1 page)
Reducing Hold-Down Anchorage
Segmented Shearwalls Continuous Shearwalls
Shearwall Design Methods
Segmented
1. Aspect Ratio for
seismic 2:1
2. Aspect ratio up to
3.5:1, if allowable
shear is reduced by
2w/h
IBC 2305.3.3
Force Transfer
1. Code does not
provide guidance for
this method
2. Different approaches
using rational
analysis are used
IBC 2305.3.8.1
Perforated
1. Code provides
specific requirements
2. The capacity is
determined based on
empirical equations
and tables
IBC 2305.3.8.2
Segmented (Traditional) Wood Shear Walls
(IBC 2305.3)
Only full height
segments are
considered
Max aspect ratio
2:1 for seismic
3.5:1 for wind
Current Code design
values based on data
dating back to 1950s.
H H H H
v v
V
Aspect ratio applies to full
height segment (dotted)
Shear Wall With Openings
Force Transfer Around Openings
(IBC 2305.3.7.1)
Shear around
openings accounted
for by strapping or
framing
based on a rational
analysis
H/w ratio defined by
wall pier
V
H
H
v
Wall
Pier
Aspect ratio applies to wall
pier segment (dotted)
Shear Wall With Opening
Force Transfer Around Opening
Hold-downs only at
ends
Extra calculations
and added
construction details
(connections &
blocking)
Uses traditional
design values
V
H
H
v
Shear Wall With Opening
Perforated Shear Wall
(IBC 2305.3.7.2)
Openings accounted for by
empirical adjustment
factor
Hold-downs only at ends
Uplift between hold downs,
t, at full height segments is
required
Limited to 490 plf
980 plf Seismic
1370 plf - Wind
V
H H
v
t
Aspect ratio applies to full
height segment (dotted)
X
Shear Capacity Adjustment
Shear Capacity Adjustment
Equation for Perforated Shearwalls
Shear Capacity Adjustment
Equation for Perforated Shearwalls
Suggested
References
Hold-Down Placement
Traditional
Hold-Down Placement
Perforated
Performance Based Seismic
Design
PBSD offers owners/operators the opportunity to limit
business interruption, economic loss, and other
consequences for less severe but more probable
earthquake hazards
Necessitates accurate modeling of structures under
seismic loading which for wood light-frame structures, this
is complex because the load path is not as discrete
NEESWood Capstone Tests
APA Publications and Website
For free publications
go to:
www.apawood.org
and enter the
Publications Store
A Sampling of APA Publications available at:
www.apawood.org
T300 Glulam connection details
E30 Engineered Wood Const. Guide
L350 Diaphragms and Shear Walls
T325 Roof fastening for wind uplift
Y250 Shear transfer at engineered
floors
A410 Roof retrofitting for wind uplift
D485 Corrosion resistant fasteners
A Sampling of APA Technical Topics - available at
www.apawood.org
TT-035 Corrosion resistant fasteners
TT-036 Glued floors
TT-039 Nail withdrawal
TT-070 Nail pull through
TT-045 Min. nail penetration
TT-012 Overdriven fasteners
TT-056 Power driven fasteners
TT-050/051 Screw withdrawal
TT-058 Slant nailing
TT-061- Nailing thin flange I-joists
TT-020 Dowel bearing strength
This concludes The
American Institute of
Architects Continuing
Education Systems Course
Quest i ons?
Bryan Readling, P.E.
bryan.readling@apawood.org
APA Help Desk
help@apawood.org
253-620-7400