HomeAlex Jones Radio Show

5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You

Steven
Infowars.com
April 17, 2011

Note: Many well-known freedom movement spokesmen/women have not been willing to fully discuss
and expose this subject for reasons known only to them. Why? Because, they either think it is too
trivial, they do not fully understand it or perhaps in their mind, its been debunked by an attorney,
whom they give credence to, without doing their own thorough due diligence. It is also important to
note that there are some well-intentioned lawyers who strive to assist in making our world a safer and
better place for all to live. The intention of this article is to shine a bright light and empower you to
help break the matrix grip.

First and foremost, it is vitally important to comprehend that everything in the business / commercial
world is done by contract, both public and private. Secondly, relationships are also contractual
marital, parental and social (friendships). You both consciously and unconsciously verbally contract
all day long and when merited, in written form as well.

Words are understood to be very powerful and it is through spelling that spells are cast. However, it is
a very misunderstood fact that words used in everyday language most often do not have the same
meaning in a legal sense (contractual or court setting).

What are these 5 words that are used to control / enslave you? Person, resident, citizen, driver and
passenger (all commercial terms). In my humble opinion, these 5 words are the keys to casting the
spell in the attorneys legal jargon trickery. All commercial transactions / contracts have been
designed to remove the men and women from the equation and replace with a legal fictional entity in
the matrix system.




PERSON is a legal entity a trust, corporation, partnership, association. Dont be fooled by the
attorneys statutory word trickery if you see natural person. An adverb cannot change the root
meaning of a word. Plain and simple, it is impossible to be a person. You are either a man or
woman a living being. A person is a dead entity and attorneys may only represent persons
commercial legal entities.

RESIDENT is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a State (a legal entity). To reside is a
commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes.

CITIZEN is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a Federal district. It is also a commercial
term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
may only tax those people who have voluntarily deemed themselves internal to the district. Thus only
legal entities have tax liability.

DRIVER is a For Hire / paid operator of a motor vehicle. The term motor vehicle is defined as
every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power used for
commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or
property or cargo.

PASSENGER is someone who pays a fare for passage on a commercial carrier airplane, bus, taxi,
limousine, cruise ship, train or trolley, rather than a guest who travels without charge or fee.

It is necessary to go to the very root when looking at a complex problem. It is obvious that most
politicians and their key staff are attorneys/lawyers, who are minions in servitude to the bankers. The
simplest solution is to start removing the attorneys from office.

Take note of these quotes:

In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told
me that If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire
system will collapse. Henry Bellmon, U.S. Senator (1969).



Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance. Mortimer
Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not they
are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and
their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders. The sack of the United
States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its
powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls
all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will. Congressman Charles
McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centres has
owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson. History depicts Andrew
Jackson as the last truly honourable and incorruptible American president. President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House.

our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men .. a power so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [we had] better not speak above
[our] breath when [we] speak in condemnation of it We have come to be completely controlled
by small groups of dominant men. President Woodrow Wilson.

The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes Felix
Frankfurter, United States Supreme Court Justice.

Give me control over a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws. Baron M.A.
Rothschild (1744 1812)

The Solution for unravelling control in the matrix grip:

The NAME = all Capital letter designation JOHN DOE or JANE DOE is the corporate legal entity =
person (also known as straw man).

This is not a trivial matter. The key to your freedom is to know that you are not this NAME /
PERSON. The voluntary act of identifying yourself in a legal contractual setting without proper status
declaration will continue your enslavement to the system. You are a living being.

There are 4 ways to respond when offered a contract acceptance, conditional acceptance, rejection
or going silent (acquiescence). The first two choices are honourable and the last two choices are
dishonourable.

Why is a judge referred to as Your Honour? Its because he/she is weighing who is before him/her
and remaining in honour . . . like a mirror and also weighing who will get into argument and therefore
acting in dishonour.

Lessons in HONOR AND DISHONOR

You will always lose unless you abide by the rules of the matrix game. You will probably lose even if
you use the rules, because you will argue and that is what the controllers want you to do, argue.
When you argue, you are in dishonour. This is unfortunately how weve been conditioned.

Forget about the law. The law is only for those that have violated some tenet of commerce.

Remember, everything in this world is a contract. When you go to the store to purchase a quart of
milk, you are about to enter into a contract. When you pick up the milk and pay for it, the clerk will
give you a receipt. This receipt is the title to the quart of milk. If you discard the receipt before you
leave the store and you leave the store, you could be charged with stealing since you do not have the
title to the milk.

You will probably begin to argue. Once you begin to argue, you are in dishonour and when you are in
dishonour nothing matters except getting back in honour.

Here is a Biblical story example: Jesus came upon the land to teach people how to operate in
commerce. His main purpose was to save us from our dishonour. Yet we persist in this dishonour by
acquiring things, which we are treating as little demigods.






There are four possible ways in which to answer when one is offered a contract.

a. Agree to the contract and you are in honour.

b. Remain silent (is consider insolent) and therefore you are in dishonour.

c. To argue about the contract is a dishonour. That is why the courts want you to have an attorney.
Attorneys argue and get you in dishonour. They are there to turn you in!

d. Doing an ovation is like bargaining and it is a conditional acceptance. For example, if a merchant is
selling apples for one dollar each and you want an apple, but you dont want to pay a dollar, you may
offer fifty cents. This is bartering, not dishonour and you are remaining in honour. You have just
placed the merchant in the position of having to make one of the same four choices on how to answer.
You will probably walk away and he will lose the sale if he declines by arguing or remaining silent.
He lost because he dishonoured you. He remains in honour if he chooses d.

Getting back to the lesson. The beggars offered Jesus a contract. Jesus replied, What would you have
me do? He is now doing an ovation to the contract. Before he can comply, he has to know what the
contract requires. The beggars then re-offered the contract to Jesus by saying, make us see. He then
agreed by saying, you are healed. The beggars and Jesus were always in honour and the contract
was completed and everyone was satisfied.

In a court setting, you should re-offer the Judge, by stating: Your Honour, I conditionally accept your
offer to give you a NAME upon Proof of Claim that if I do so, it will not bind me to any contract with
the State of XYZ (whatever jurisdiction you are supposedly in). The judge will keep trying to get you
into contract. You must continue to conditionally accepting the judges offer by continually repeating,
upon Proof of whatever Claim they are making.

The case is The State of XXY v. JOHN DOE. The judge asks youHow do you plead, Guilty or Not
Guilty? or he may say Responsible or Not Responsible? Your answer: Your honour, I conditionally
accept your offer to plead upon Proof of Claim that the State of XYX is an injured or the State of
XYZ and I have a contract and upon Proof of Claim that the XYZ on the complaint, in all upper case
letters is not a legal fiction and upon Proof of Claim that, I, a living being, am a corporation.



PRESUMPTION

The people of the courts and all levels of government presume that you are a corporation because all
courts and governments are legal fictions and following the law of like kind can only deal with other
legal fictions or incompetent persons. All government codes/statutes (laws) deal only with persons,
corporations, trusts, partnerships or other like entities. They are not real. They only exist on paper (in
form). They do not exist in the physical sense (substance).

A city, a county and a state have lines drawn on a map that show (what they claim to be) their
jurisdiction. There are buildings that are referred to as schools, courts, offices and other titles. They
are real because they are made with gravel, cement, wood and other physical materials. The
government is a fiction created from a mans imagination. It is of course not real, and only an image
in peoples minds. It cannot do anything without the physical man. The physical man has a go
between and that go between is a legal fiction. It is a transmitting utility. Just like the electric
power company manufactures electrical power for business or home use, the transmission lines are the
transmitting utility that connects them together. The person legal entity straw man all capital
letter name fictional corporation is the transmitting utility between the flesh and blood man and the
government and its agencies.

Presumption comes into play when you receive a contract from the government, a police officer,
court, etc., and if you do not correct them, they will presume that you are the all capital letter NAME
legal entity. It is when you dont correct them that the presumption becomes a stipulation of fact.

STIPULATION

A stipulation is an agreement that the facts of the case are not in dispute and therefore will not and
cannot be addressed from the point of stipulation. The way that you get into a contract is by doing
something that you may be unaware of . . . like a drivers license. You are offering the State to allow
you to operate a vehicle in a commercial venture on the roadways within the State, when you apply
for a drivers license.

Whomever offers the contract has the energy or the power because they are the Creditor. The one who
is being offered the contract is the Debtor. You always want to be the Creditor. Now, while you are
operating the vehicle in commerce, you violate a rule (law) that you agreed to abide by accepting the
license.

You were the Creditor when you applied for a license, and were in honour. They were the Debtor.
Then they re-offered you the license, making them the Creditor and you the Debtor. Everyone is still
in honour when you accepted the license (contract). When you violate some rule (law), you are in
dishonour and have to go to a hearing (court). Once again, you are going through the same rules.
Honour and dishonour.

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

Condition yourself to remember that everything is a contract. When somebody offers you a contract
and you do not like the terms, simply re-offer or counter-offer. When a debt collector sends a letter / a
collection notice that is a contract. You now have the choices of a, b, c, and d. What are you going to
do? The thing not to do is argue or remain silent. You must re-offer in a timely manner.

Mr. Debt Collector, I conditionally accept your offer to pay the debt indicated, upon Proof of Claim
that you are the owner of the debt and upon Proof of Claim that you and I have a signed contract.

When a police officer pulls you over and offers you a ticket for speeding, the ticket is a contract.
When he asks you to sign the ticket, stating that you promise to appear at a certain date, that is a
contract. You may properly do two things.

1. You may demand that the police officer takes you to a Judge/Magistrate immediately or;

2. You may sign the ticket: All rights reserved, UCC 1-308, and then sign the Name below what you
just wrote on the ticket. This action allows you 72 hours to rescind the contract. A widely recognized
and universal law of commerce is that contracts can be cancelled within 72 hours. Many contracts
include a document titled notice of rescission. The buyer, in most cases, must execute / sign and
date the document and get it into the possession of the seller in order to properly rescind the sale.

If you are arrested and taken before a Magistrate, he/she will ask you to state your Name. The
Magistrate is making you an offer to enter their jurisdiction. Next you will be invited to sign the paper
the clerk offers you. You will be in a contract if you sign it.





Remember, if you are about to go into court, it is vitally important to declare that you are not a
corporation prior to a hearing or trial. Otherwise, the judge will find your silence on that point a fact
and then proceed under the presumption that you are a corporation.

Please remember, you are not a Name. You are a very powerful living being when in honour.

____________________________________________________________________
Original article seen on Activist Post by the one, known as Steven, spiritual Living Being having a
human experience. One lives life in this realm intentionally and loves, honours and respects all
Universal beings as One. He does not have to prove the negative, rather One just needs to know to not
get trapped with controlling words and jargon designed as such. One is not a person, not a subject or
citizen nor has any allegiance to any country, State or States in contract, not a U.S. Citizen or
National, not a civilian, not a resident, not a legal entity dolus trust, not an enemy combatant, and One
is not a member of any Jural, political or religious society/body. Be it also known that person is a
word of the Private Civil Law, and a man is a word of nature.
===================================================================


Responses to The 5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You

Antonius says:
April 18, 2011 at 7:57 am
STIPULATION

A stipulation is an agreement that the facts of the case are not in dispute and therefore will not and
cannot be addressed from the point of stipulation. The way that you get into a contract is by doing
something that you may be unaware of . . . like a drivers license. You are offering the State to allow
you to operate a vehicle in a commercial venture on the roadways within the State, when you apply
for a drivers license.

Well, I never wanted to apply for a license. I just wanted to start driving. However, the State
FORCES me to obtain a drivers license with threat of imprisonment. So if I never agree to enter into
a counteract with the State to allow me to drive, if the State ever finds me driving without their
permission they will AT GUN POINT force me into a cage until I succumb to their demands.

TOR-744926 says:
April 18, 2011 at 6:58 am
Under the Right to Travel, a drivers license is not required since you are not a driver but a traveller
and any person with you is a companion or guest and not a passenger. And since you are not a
driver of a motor vehicle but a traveller on a road machine you are not involved in commerce.
Therefore, since you are not involved in commerce, proof of insurance is not required.

You must now remove your license plates and disable the lamps that illuminate the rear plate. Write a
formal letter to the state declaring that you decline their drivers license and no longer wish to
participate. Now, vehicle registration and state inspection are no longer required. Carry with you an
affidavit to give to an officer or state trooper that informs him of your right to travel.

I did this for several years until I was offered a very lucrative position as a contractor on a Air Force
base. They will not allow a vehicle past their gates without all the trappings, stickers, tags, plates and
lights and will not allow you to operate such contrivance without a license.

Good luck to you if you ever decide to go this route because much of your time will be spent
explaining your beliefs to the law (police officers on the street and judges in the courts).




one who is says:
April 17, 2011 at 9:41 pm
Sorry. First time commenting and got interrupted and got kicked out of my comment window. Any
way. I was giving information as to law cites and other documents that are law sources for finding out
for yourself what this world is going on and based upon if you believe God or man you will either
take the red pill or the blue pill. One will only come out and be separated for the cause that it simply
the law of ones being expressing consistently with its nature and substance.

I have nothing for sale. We do have something to give and help others with.

Concerning the non-statutory abatement process which is a serious tool to be used only by those who
through diligent study and prayer know One must know with whom he deals and one must know
what and who he is?who is the form following the function of what. Whom do you serve? No man
can serve two masters! The one to whom this understanding was given by grace through faith has
spoken of these matters on radio shows and public meetings before. Lord willing he and or we may
again. Any who are led to seek out more are welcome. Freely we have received, freely we shall give,
we have nothing for sale. This is not a Patriot guru quick fix or some scheme to sell a package deal.
We are dealing with a system of Naturalism and it can only be overcome with Supernaturalism.

This has to do with maintaining the Law of Peace when those who love the law of war acting as alien
enemies to come upon the unsuspecting like locust to eat up their substance i.e. Foreclosure, so called
Traffic violations, entry to land, modus tenendi, modus vivendi, etc.

Some lawyer of 21 years gave the first paragraph of Blacks 4th of which I have a copy. It also says
A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties are ascribed to him.
Pollock, first Bok of Jurispr. 110.

Remember Noscitur a sociis, it is known by its associates. Corporations are artificial. They only have
being when one thinks about them. Called also ens legis and ens rationis.

Note: as to identity look up John Henry Wigmores Principles of Judicial Proof, where he says,
resemblance may be fatal to identity when the law of being is changed. (1913), pp. 65-68.

The American Law institute says on PERSON:

Out of my Pamphlet on PERSON is one cite:
(2) A Nexus has two elements: the Persons, and the Interest. The Persons to a Nexus are two. From
the side of the person by whom State force is demandable, the Nexus is termed a Right. From the side
of the person against whom it is demandable, the Nexus is termed a Burden, Duty, Obligation, or
Liability. The former person is termed Obligee, the latter Obligor. Wigmore, A Summary of the
Principles of Torts, (Select Cases on the Law of Torts, vol. II, Appendix A.) [All licenses create
nexuses: the Parties become Persons in the Contract and the Obligations springing from the Contract
become the Interests the Parties have in the other. Licenses create the moral obligation between the
licensee and the licensor.] See also Progress Development Corp. v. Mitchell, 182 F.Supp. 681.

And lastly on PERSON from the pamphlet:
This word person and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also
apparently natural beings, it is difficult to understand: but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at
whatever cost, a true and proper understanding of the word in all the phases of its proper useThe
words persona and personae did not have the meaning in the Roman which attaches to homo, the
individual, or a man in the English; it had a peculiar reference to artificial beings, and the condition or
status of individualsA person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition
with which he is investednot an individual or physical person, but the status, condition, or character
borne by physical personsThe law of persons is the law of status or condition.
A moments reflection enables one to see that man and person cannot be synonymous, for there
cannot be an artificial man, though there are artificial persons. Thus the conclusion is easily reached
that the law itself often creates an entity or a being which is called a person; the law cannot create an
artificial man, but it can and frequently does invest him with artificial attributes; this is his
personalitythat is to say, the man-person; and abstract persons, which are fictitious and which have
no existence except in law; that is to say, those which are purely legal conceptions or creations.
American Law and Procedure, Volume 13, pp. 137-162 (1910).