Sie sind auf Seite 1von 16

SNMP-based enterprise IP network topology discovery

Suman Pandey
1
, Mi-Jung Choi
2,
*, Young J. Won
1
and James Won-Ki Hong
1,3
1
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea
2
Department of Computer Science, Kangwan National University, Chuncheon, Korea
3
Division of IT Convergence Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea
SUMMARY
Precise network topology information is required to perform management activities such as fault detection,
root cause analysis, performance monitoring, and load balancing in enterprise networks. To accomplish
these management tasks, both network discovery and connectivity information are essential. This paper
examines various problems with the existing topology discovery mechanisms and proposes an SNMP-based
approach to discover physical as well as logical topology. We present algorithms for identifying network
device types and discovering connectivity among them. The connectivity of end host and management
information base (MIB)-enabled devices with switches and routers is discussed and evaluated. We also
present an algorithm for discovering logical topology, such as VLAN and subnet connectivity. Finally, we
present a combination of graph and tree layouts, to visualize connectivity information. Copyright 2010
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Received 20 May 2009; Revised 31 March 2010; Accepted 31 March 2010
1. INTRODUCTION
Networks are becoming more complex and larger as the number of users as well as the applications
increase. Knowledge of network topology of the enterprise network is required for achieving several
network management objectives, including root cause analysis [27], trafc bottleneck, failed compo-
nents, resource management, planning, and deployment of new elements. All these management
activities can be made easier and can be shown on a network topology map, so that administrators can
have a clear view of the network. An inexperienced network administrator joining an organization
faces many difculties if there is no discovery tool that shows topology information based on type of
device, subnets and virtual local area network (VLAN) with an understandable user interface. Even for
the experienced administrator, keeping track of devices and their connectivity details without having
a proper method of visually presenting them is labor intensive. Network topology can be dened as the
study of arrangements of nodes and their interconnection and it can be categorized as link layer
topology, Internet topology and overlay topology, as proposed by Donnet and Friedman [18]. Our
research falls into the category of link layer and router-level topology of an organization or an
autonomous system (AS). This is an intra-domain topology discovery task. Network topology is the
arrangement of the elements (e.g., links, nodes) of a network and the physical and logical intercon-
nections among its nodes. In physical network topology peers are connected to ports on devices via a
transmission link; in logical network topology a network is divided into logical segments through
subnets and VLANs [16,17]. The network can be viewed at different levels of abstraction using a
logical topology view.
*Correspondence to: Mi-Jung Choi, Department of Computer Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon,
South Korea.
E-mail: mjchoi@kangwon.ac.kr
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT
Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
Published online 25 August 2010 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/nem.756
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Various techniques exist for automatically discovering topologies, including ICMP tracerouter [23],
DNS[22], ARP[21], end-to-end measurement [10] and Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
[15]. We chose to use SNMP to accomplish this task, and did a detailed analysis of management
information base (MIB) modules which will be utilized to accomplish this. The reason for choosing
SNMP is its better performance compared to other techniques [1] and its capability to derive multiple
properties of the devices, which can help in nding accurate connectivity with interface details and
device types. We tried to achieve simplicity, accuracy and efciency in our algorithm. SNMP-based
automatic topology discovery is featured in many network management tools, including IBMTivoli and
HP Open view; however, these tools mainly discover network layer topology [2,3]. Some other tools
such as Riversoft NMOS and Micromuse Netcool support layer 2 discoveries, but they are based on
proprietary technology. We have no access to their proprietary technology; moreover, all these com-
mercial tools are expensive. Cisco proposed Physical Network Topology Identication and Discovery
(PTOPO-MIB) and standardized it in RFC 2922 [9], but unfortunately Cisco is the only vendor who
implements this MIB. For these reasons we explored only standard MIB modules which are imple-
mented by all vendors.
Apart from the commercial efforts by IBM Tivoli and HP Open view, there has also been much
effort made by the research community to explore the standard MIB for topology discovery. Siam-
walla et al. [1] proposed mechanisms to discover topology by combining various methods such as
ping, traceroute, SNMP, DNS, and ARP. Similarly Wood et al. [26] used non-SNMP protocols and
techniques to discover the network, including watching ARP and RIP packets, ICMP ping and
traceroute. However, these methods could discover only L3-level topology, and the report did not
propose any mechanisms to discover L2- or host-level topology. Breitbart et al. [2] proposed a
mechanism for discovering an L2-level topology that is heterogeneous, irrespective of any kind of
network, but this mechanism requires ICMP spoong in order to get a complete forwarding table,
which is not allowed in most of todays networks. Originally, in their method, they assumed that all
the physical addresses were cached in every switch, and to reach this condition they sent a ping
message between each pair of hosts (ICMP spoong). Their algorithm is then applied to each pair
of switch ports to nd connectivity. Their work was then extended by Bejerano [25] to discover
accurate topology including dumb devices such as a hub. These algorithms are time-consuming and
resource-intensive. They also failed to provide details on SNMP MIB modules required for gath-
ering topology information and stitching them together. Lowekamp et al. [3] then proposed a
mechanism to discover L2-level topology that did not require complete forwarding information of
bridges; their approach contradicted that of Breitbart et al. [2]. They dene a simple connection as
a pair of switch ports that connects two switches, possibly with another switch between them. Their
algorithm is sufcient for discovering L2-level topology; however, we need a solution to discover
end host topology with switches and a way to combine L3, L2 and end host topologies. Another less
studied area in the enterprise network is VLAN. Sung et al. [24] highlighted the importance of
VLAN in an enterprise network; however, their focus is on systematic design of the VLAN. Our
contribution is signicant in the following ways:

We obtained various congurations and device properties using MIB modules, and logically
combined them together to get useful topology information.

Identifying different type of devices is an important part of nding link layer topologies. Depend-
ing on different types of devices we need to utilize different connectivity algorithms. Previously
only system.sysServices MIB and ipForwarding MIB were used to identify routers and switches.
In contrast, we utilized more complex congurations nding accurate topological details,
interface-to-interface connectivity and different types of services in MIB-enabled devices such as
printer, servers, web server, and multimedia servers.

The discovery of L2 with end host connectivity has generated little attention. We propose a
heuristics-based algorithm to connect end hosts and MIB-enabled devices such as printers and
servers with the L2 switches.

In addition to the interconnectivity we also show logical-level topology by detailing the VLAN
and subnet discovery and interconnection of devices in VLAN and subnets. We highlighted the
difference between standard VLAN implementation and Cisco switchs VLAN implementation.
170 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the proposed methods and our
algorithms. Section 3 describes system design and implementation details. Section 4 discusses topol-
ogy view and analyses the results, while Section 5 concludes the paper and discusses future work.
2. PROPOSED METHOD
Our goal was to design an algorithm that determines both the physical and logical topology using the
interface connectivity details of an enterprise network. To accomplish this goal, various MIB modules
are used to fetch information related to routing tables, ARP cache, and Bridge-MIB from the network
elements. The proposed algorithm is divided into seven main steps in Algorithm 1.
The basic inputs toAlgorithm 1 include: IP address of gateway routers, boundary information (range
of IP addresses to be discovered), SNMP community string and SNMP port number. Multiple IP ranges
and multiple community strings can be specied to discover elements in more than one range and
community. After accepting the inputs the device discovery starts, it uses the routing table and ARP
cache table through SNMP standard MIB-II [12] to discover devices. For each discovered device, it
rst checks whether the device supports SNMP. If it does, then device type identication is
performede.g., routers, L2/L3/L4/L7 switches, printers, network terminal nodesand, depending
on the type of device, the relevant MIB objects (explained in Section 2.1) are loaded into the database.
This information is used to discover connectivity among L2 and L2 devices, L2 and L3 devices, L3 and
L3 devices, and L2/L3 devices and end hosts. If the device does not support SNMPthen it is considered
end host and for discovering connectivity it depends on the information retrieved from switches and
routers. To provide logical topology connectivity information, the connectivity algorithm for a single
subnet and VLAN is implemented.
2.1. SNMP MIB modules
The proposed discovery mechanism is based on SNMP. We used standard MIB modules such as
RFC-1213 [12], BRIDGE-MIB [13], Q-BRIDGE-MIB [14], Cisco private MIB, and CISCO-VTP-
MIB [7].
MIBII (RFC-1213) is divided into three groups: system, interface and ip. The sysServices object
from the system group is used for determining the type of device. The ifTable from the interface group
helps us gather the details of the interfaces of the switches. The ipRouteTable from the ip group stores
the routing information of L3 devices. This includes information about the next hop taken to reach the
destination and helps us discover L3-level topology. The ipNetToMediaTable maintains the ARP cache
table for the mapping of MAC addresses to IP addresses; we use this table to discover more devices.
Bridge-MIB helps us gather L2-level topology. dot1dBasePortEntry maps from Bridge Port to ifIndex.
The dot1dTpFdbTable provides us with a forwarding table, which is also referred to as the address
Algorithm 1. Overall algorithm for network discovery
1. Take network information inputs
2. Device discovery
a. Device discovery using next hop mechanism
b. Device discovery using ARP cache entries
3. Device type discovery
4. Device grouping based on IP address
5. Connectivity discovery
a. L2 to L2 connectivity
b. L2 to L3 connectivity
c . L3 to L3 connectivity
d. L2 and L3 to end host connectivity
6. Subnet discovery and connectivity discovery in subnet
7. VLAN discovery and connectivity discovery in VLAN
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 171
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
forwarding table (AFT). The combination of L2- and L3-level topology can also uncover the connec-
tivity between L2 and L3 elements. The dot1dStp MIB module is also used for collecting spanning tree
information about the L2 and L3 devices. Q-BRIDGE-MIB is used for VLAN discovery. Table 1
explains all the SNMP MIB modules and their signicance in relation to discovery and connectivity
algorithms. The detailed use of these MIB modules is explained in subsequent sections.
2.2. Device discovery
Algorithm 2 describes the device discovery. RFC-1213 denes a simple, workable structure of
managed objects for managing TCP/IP-based networks. The managed objects mentioned in this RFC
are standard and implemented by all the vendors. We utilized their minimum and workable architecture
in discovering topology, and we found that this information is sufcient for discovering almost all the
devices in a network. The routing table of the device is maintained by ipRouteTable, which contains
an entry for each route. We utilize only the ipRouteNextHop and ipRouteType entries of these tables
(line 7). ipRouteNextHop is the IP address of the next hop in the route. There are four types of
ipRouteType: direct, indirect, invalid, and other. The direct type refers to the same device with multiple
IP addresses, so we discard entries of the direct, invalid, and other types. We lter the records and take
only those entries that are indirect.
ipRouteTable is used to discover all the routers or L3 devices. To discover end hosts and L2 devices,
we use ipNetToMediaTable (line 18)i.e., an IP address translation table that contains the mapping of
IP addresses to corresponding physical addresses. This table also includes a listing of active members
on the network, since they exchange their ARP information in the network. As soon as we discover a
node, we use all the unique ipNetToMediaNetAddress entries to discover another set of new nodes.
An important step in discovering devices is considering synonyms for a single device. This is the
fourth step of Algorithm 1. A device can have multiple IP addresses that correspond to the multiple
subnets to which the device belongs. ipAddrTable contains the IP address assigned to the multiple
interfaces in the managed node. There can be one interface for one subnet. Whenever a new device is
discovered, it is possible that the new IP address is a synonym of an already discovered device. To
check for this condition, a table of synonyms of the already discovered devices is maintained, and
before conrming that the discovered device is new verication is performed by checking these
synonyms.
Algorithm 2. Device discovery
1. Procedure Device_discovery
2. R[] <- Stack of router IP address, initially empty
3. D[] <- Stack of router already visited, initially empty
4. R[].push(gateway_router_IP)
5. For each R[n]
6. If (snmpget(R[n]) == TRUE) then
7. N_H[] <- Get next hop set for R[n]<- ipRouteNextHop if ipRouteType is indirect
8. For each N_H[m]
9. If(R[] contains N_H[m]) then continue
10. R[].push(N_H[m])
11. If (D[] contains N_H[m]) then continue
12. D[].add(N_H[m])
13. Else
14. R[n].type= host
15. D[].add(Rn)
16. For each D[i]
17. If(snmpget(D[i]== TRUE) then
18. N_D[] <- Get nettomediatable for D[i] <- ipNetToMediaNetAddress
19. For each N_D[j]
20. If(D[] contains N_D[j]) then continue
21. D[].add(N_D[j])
172 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
2.3. Device type discovery
Device type discovery is an important part of nding connectivity information. Once the device type
is known, different algorithms can be used to nd connectivity among various types of devices. To
discover the types of devices, we use the sysServices MIB object and convert it into a seven-bit string.
Each bit corresponds to the seven layers of an OSI network model. If a device has sysServices 78
Table 1. MIB information for topology discovery.
MIB MIB object Signicance of MIB in our algorithm
MIBII
(REF-1213-MIB)
System sysServices Identify device type
system sysDescr Device description
Iftable ifIndex Device interface
iftable ifDescr Interface description
iftable ifPhyaddress Interface MAC address
ip ipForwarding Decides whether device can forward data
or not
ip ipRouteTable ipRouteNextHop The next hops that can be reached
ip ipRouteTable ipRouteType If value is direct, the next hop is another
IP of the same machine
ip ipAddrTable ipAdEntAddr Obtain multiple IP addresses for one
device
ip ipAddrTable ipAdEntNetMask Calculate subnets
ip ipNetToMediaTable
ipNetToMediaNetAddress
Obtain the ARP table entries
ip ipNetToMediaTable
ipNetToMediaPhysAddress
Obtain mapping of the IP address to
the physical address
CISCO-VTP-MIB
(Only for Cisco
devices)
vtpVlanState Cisco private MIB for VLAN
identication, obtain the Bridge-MIB
information corresponding to each
VLAN using community string
indexing
Q-BRIDGE-MIB
(Devices from
vendor other
than Cisco)
qBridgeMIB qBridgeMIBObject
do1qVlan do1qPortVlanTable
do1qPortVlanEntry dot1qPvid
VLAN identication information for
non Cisco device
BRIDGE-MIB for
connectivity
discovery
dot1dBrige dot1dBase
dot1dBasePortTable
dot1dBasePortEntry dot1dBasePort
Same as dpt1dTpFdbPort, mapped
with the dot1dBasePortIfIndex,
which is same as ifIndex entries
dot1dBrige dot1dBase
dot1dBasePortTable
dot1dBasePortEntry dot1dBasePortIfIndex
Mapped to ifIndex
dot1dBrige dot1dTp dot1dTpFdbTable
dot1dTpFdbEntry dot1dTpFdbAddress
The addresses in the forwarding table
dot1dBrige dot1dTp dot1dTpFdbTable
dot1dTpFdbEntry dot1dTpFdbPort
Interface to which the forwarded entry is
connected
dot1dBrige dot1dTp dot1dTpFdbTable
dot1dTpFdbEntry dot1dTpFdbStatus
Status of the interface
BRIDGE-MIB for
spanning tree
discovery
dot1dBrige dot1dStp dot1dStpPortTable
dot1dStpPortEntry dot1dStpPort
STP-related information for interface
dot1dBrige dot1dStp dot1dStpPortTable
dot1dStpPortEntry dot1dStpPortState
Entries whose ports are not broken or
invalid is considered
dot1dBrige dot1dStp dot1dStpPortTable
dot1dStpPortEntry dot1dStpPortDesignatedRoot
Root bridge in STP
dot1dBrige dot1dStp dot1dStpPortTable
dot1dStpPortEntry dot1dStpPortDesignatedBridge
Bridge directly connected or bridges
own ID
dot1dBrige dot1dStp dot1dStpPortTable
dot1dStpPortEntry dot1dStpPortDesignatedPort
Port on the designated bridge
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 173
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
(1001110)i.e., its second, third, fourth, and seventh bits are setthen the device is an L7 switch that
provides services for all four layers. This algorithm also uses dot1dBrige, ifTable, and service specic
MIB. It uses Bridge-MIB information to check whether the device can support interface-to-interface
connectivity at L2. Such information helps us decide if the device can show interface-to-interface
connectivity in the network view map. We categorize such a device as a switch. sysServices and
Bridge-MIB are normally utilized to discover the device type [2,4]; our approach differs in that we also
utilized ifTable and service specic MIB such as Printer MIB for ner granularity of discovering device
type. The ifTable MIB helps us decide whether the L3 devices are congured to have the same MAC
address for multiple interfaces. This helps us lter the L3 devices for situations where we cannot show
the interface-to-interface connectivity with other devices, because they have the same MAC addresses
for multiple ports and it is not possible to distinguish ports to which the other devices are connected.
Printer MIB is used to check whether the device is a printer or not. To identify other types of services
and product-specic information like a printer we can utilize various other MIB modules [20],
including WWW-MIB, APACHE-MIB, and cisco specic VPN, Storage networking products, voice
telephony and messaging software MIB. The ow chart in Figure 1 explains the algorithm used to
distinguish device type. The different output boxes in the ow chart show the different types of devices
discovered. The subsequent section explains the connectivity discovery among various types of
devices.
2.4. Connectivity discovery
Algorithm 3 describes connectivity discovery, which is divided into four sub-procedures: switch-to-
switch, switch-to-router, router-to-router, and switch- and router-to-end host connectivity. As soon as
the device type is discovered, we determine what types of MIB modules need to be stored in the
database to nd connectivity; for example, if the device is an L2, L3, L4, or L7 switch, and if it
supports Bridge-MIB, then we retrieve the Bridge-MIB of that device and store it in the database. If
Figure 1. Flow chart for device type discovery.
174 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
the device is a Cisco switch, then we apply community string indexing [6] and load the Bridge-MIB
for each VLAN. If the device is an L3, L7, or L4 switch or router, then we load the routing table MIB.
Furthermore, this information is used to discover connectivity among the devices.
Switch-to-switch connectivity (lines 720) is discovered using Bridge-MIB. Two different kinds of
bridging techniques exist in todays networks: transparent bridging, which is predominant in Ethernet
networks; and source-route transparent (SRT) bridging, which is supported in token ring networks. The
dot1dTp group of Bridge-MIB contains the objects that describe the device state with respect to
transparent bridging and SRT. The dot1dStp group contains the objects that denote the bridges state
with respect to the spanning tree. Bridge-MIB also has a relationship with some of the standard MIB
modules; thus it is assumed that the bridge implementing Bridge-MIB will also implement at least the
Algorithm 3. Connectivity discovery
1. Procedure Connectivity_discovery()
2. S[] <- L2, L3, L4, L7 switch
3. R[] <- L3 router
4. D[] <- Devices other than switch and router
5. Switch_pair_set { (S[1],S[2]). . . (S[i-1] ,S[i])}
6. Switch_router_pair_set { (S[1],R[1]). . . (S[i] ,R[k])}
7. Subprocedure Switch_to_switch_connectivity()
8. For each Switch_pair_set (S[i],S[j])
9. M_Si[] <- MAC address of switch S[i] <- ifphyaddress
10. M_Sj[] <- MAC address of switch S[j] <- ifphyaddress
11. For each M_Si[m]
12. If (connectivity already found for M_Si[m]) then continue
13. AFT_M_Si[] <- AFT of switch Si for MAC M_Si[m] <- dot1dBasePortEntry
14. For each M_Sj[n]
15. If( connectivity already found for M_Sj[n]) then continue
16. AFT_M_Sj[] <- AFT of switch Sj for MAC M_Sj[n] <- dot1dBasePortEntry
17. If (AFT_M_Si[] contains M_Sj[n] ) and (AFT_M_Sj[] contains M_Si[m] )
18. pm= Get_mapping_port(M_Si[m]) <- ifIndex
19. pn=Get_mapping_port(M_Sj[n]) <- ifIndex
20. Set_connection(pm, pn)
21. Subprocedure Switch_to_router_connectivity()
22. For each Switch_router_pair_set (S[i], R[j])
23. M_Si[] <- MAC address of switch Si <- ifphyaddress
24. M_Rj[] <- MAC address of switch Rj <- ifphyaddress
25. For each M_Si[m]
26. If (connectivity already found for M_Si[m] ) then continue
27. AFT_M_Si[] <- AFT of switch Si for MAC M_Si[m] <- dot1dBasePortEntry
28. If (AFT_M_Si[] contains M_Rj[] )
29. pm= Get_mapping_port(M_Si[m]) <- ifIndex
30. Set_connection(pm, R[j])
31. Subprocedure Switch_and_router_to_endhost_connectivity()
32. SUB[] <- Get subnet of all the devices
33. For each subnet SUB[k]
34. SR[] <- Switch and router in subnet SUB[k]
35. D[] <- Device in subnet SUB[k]
36. M_D[] <- MAC address of device in subnet SUB[k] <- ipNetToMediaNetAddress
37. ST <- Get spanning tree for SR[] in SUB[k] <- dot1dStp
38. LS[] <- ST.edgenode.leafnode
39. For each LS[i]
40. M_LS[] <- MAC address of LS[i]
41. For each M_LS[m]
42. If (connectivity already found for M_LS[m] ) then continue
43. AFT_M_LS[m] <- AFT of switch LS for MAC M_LS[m] <- dot1dBasePortEntry
44. For each M_D[n]
45. If (AFT_M_LS[m] contains M_D[n]) then
46. Set_connection(Get_mapping_port(M_LS[m],M_D[n])
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 175
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
system group and the interface group, as dened in MIB-II. The interface group is mandatory and
contains information about the devices interface, where each interface is attached to a subnetwork.
The port of the bridge is associated with one interface. Each port is uniquely identied by port number
dot1dBasePort in the bridge. dotdBasePort is mapped with interface ifIndex by dot1dBasePortEntry.
All of the data are sent and received via this port. We rst retrieve the set of L2 devices S (line 2), which
support Bridge-MIB from the database. These also can be L2, L3, L4, or L7 switches, all of which
support Bridge-MIB. Then, we run a loop on each pair of L2 devices S[i] and S[j] (line 8). Interfaces
of the switch will have a MAC address. We retrieve the MAC address for the switch pair (lines 9, 10).
Each switch will have an AFT for each port, which will contain the address forwarding information
about that port (lines 13, 16). Here, port and interface are used interchangeably. The dot1dTpFdbTable
will have entries for each port (dot1dTpFdbPort) and their forwarding MAC addresses
(dot1dTpFdbAddress). dot1dTpFdbPort will be mapped with dot1dBasePortEntry and
dot1dBasePortEntry will be mapped with ifIndex. We will search the MAC address (ifPhyaddress) of
the switch S[i] in the AFT table of switch S[j] and vice versa (line 17). If mapping is found, then the
mapping ifIndex is retrieved (lines 18, 19) and connectivity for these interfaces of the switches is stored
in the database (line 20).
Switch-to-router connectivity (lines 2130) is also discovered using Bridge-MIB. Our approach is
similar to the Breitbart et al. [2] approach, except that we have elaborated specic MIB modules as
well. If a router supports Bridge-MIB, then we can nd the interface of the switch through which a
router is connected, but we cannot nd the interface of the router through which the switch is
connected. L3 devices support L3 in sysServices and do not provide Bridge-MIBor, they are
congured to have the same MAC address for multiple interfaces. First, a list of all L2 devices and L3
devices is obtained (lines 2, 3). For each L2 device, a list of ports is retrieved for which the connectivity
is yet to be found. After nding all such interfaces, we check whether the dot1dTpFdbAddress entries
of that port (dot1dTpFdbPort) have the MAC address (ifPhyaddress) of any of the L3 devices (line 28).
If the mapping is found, then the L2 and L3 devices are considered connected with that port
(dot1dTpFdbPort). We also get the actual ifIndex entries by mapping dot1dTpFdbPort to
dot1dBasePortEntry and dot1dBasePortEntry to ifIndex. The interface-to-interface connectivity
between the L2 and L3 devices are then stored in the database (line 30).
Router-to-router connectivity is discovered using the routing table. This is the most common and
well-established way to discover L3-level topology. ipRouteNextHop for each pair of routers is utilized
to determine whether they are next hops to each other. If the mapping is found, then the connectivity
between those L3 devices is established. In this situation again, since they do not support Bridge-MIB,
the interface-to-interface connectivity goes undiscovered.
The switch (L2/L3) and router-to-end host connectivity is discovered using the subnet information
and spanning tree information of the L2 devices (lines 3146). Each device in an Ethernet belongs to
a subnet. We can nd the subnet information for each device using the SNMP ipAdEntNetMask MIB.
If a device does not support SNMP, the subnet information is obtained through ICMP address-mask
reply messages. There are various proposed subnet-guessing algorithms [1]; these algorithms are also
used to discover subnets in the absence of SNMP (line 32). Once we obtain subnet information about
the devices, the devices are grouped based on the subnet. We retrieve IP to MAC mapping for all hosts
(devices other than switches and router) in the subnet using ipNetToMediaNetAddress (line 36).
Afterwards we discover the spanning tree of the devices in the subnet (line 37). The dot1dStp group
contains the objects that denote the bridges state with respect to the spanning tree algorithm. The edge
nodes of the spanning tree are discovered next (line 38).
The spanning tree mechanism works as follows. First, the bridges in the network elect one of their
members as a root bridge. Then, each bridgeother than a root bridgedetermines its distance to the
root bridge and selects one of its ports, called the root port, closest to the root bridge. Then, the bridge
elects one port on each subnetwork, called the designated port, which is connected to the designated
bridge. The designated bridge will be closest to the LAN subnetwork. The dot1dStp MIB module helps
us discover the designated bridge of each switch and reach the edge node of the network. Once we have
the edge switches in the subnet, and the MAC address of the hosts in the subnet, we look for the MAC
address of the hosts in the AFT table of each interface of each edge node (line 45). If the mapping is
found for the interface, then connectivity is established between host and the edge node (line 46). This
176 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
is a heuristic-based approach, but by verifying manually we found that this method generates correct
results in a POSTECH network.
2.5. Logical connectivity discovery
One of our goals was to discover logical topology, that is, subnet topology and VLAN topology
along with physical topology. The ipAdEntNetMask MIB helps discover the subnet for devices.
Once the device IP address (i.e., 192.168.5.10) and subnet mask from ipAdEntNetMask (i.e.
255.255.255.0) are obtained, a bit-wise AND operation is conducted on the IP address and subnet
mask, to obtain the network address or subnet address that will be 192.168.5.0. This method is used
to nd the subnet addresses of all devices. Once the subnet addresses of all devices are obtained,
then the devices are grouped according to subnet. The connectivity among those devices is found by
applying our algorithm for connectivity discovery. To nd inter-subnet connectivity, we lter out
the devices that are part of more than one subnet. Mostly, routers are part of inter-subnet connec-
tivity. This level of abstraction provides the user with a logical view of the network, based on
subnets.
VLAN is an important component of modern networks: therefore, it is worthwhile to discuss VLAN
discovery and connectivity. Each VLAN is associated with a VLAN identier. If a network supports
VLAN and a packet is forwarded in the network, then the VLAN identier tag is appended to the
packet. VLAN-aware bridges identify VLAN-tagged frames and forward packets accordingly. Each
VLAN can have its own spanning tree or, depending on vendor implementation, there can be a single
spanning tree associated with all of them. Cisco supports multiple spanning trees for multiple VLANs.
Our work is closely associated with the Cisco VLAN, although we also explore a vendor-neutral
solution to support VLAN discovery based on standard MIB.
To discover VLANs in Cisco switches, we use CISCO-VTP-MIB. The active VLANs on a switch
are obtained using the vtpVlanState object. We used the vtpVlanState object rather than vtpVlanName,
because with the former we could determine the index number of operational VLANs in one SNMP
operation. VLAN discovery in Cisco switches is based on community string indexing [5,6]; to access
MIB modules that have a separate instance for each VLAN, community string indexing is used and
@vlanid is added as a sufx to the community name in the SNMP query while retrieving the
Bridge-MIB. If the device does not support the Cisco private MIB, then we propose a solution that
is based on the IETF standard MIBs such as Q-BRIDGE-MIB (RFC-2674) and BRIDGE-MIB
(RFC-1493). For such a device, VLAN information is obtained using dot1qPvid MIB from
dot1qPortVlanTable.
First, we deduce the boundary of our discovery and target Virtual Bridged LAN, i.e., the IP address
in our boundary using a nexthop mechanism, as explained in Section 2.2. Next, the type of device is
determined and Bridge-MIB for the L2 and L3 devices are retrieved. The spanning tree-related
information is stored in the dot1dStpPortTable of the BRIDGE-MIB. We check the dot1dStpPortState
variable of each row and discard entries whose port state is broken. VLANs associated with the
selected ports are also extracted by retrieving dot1qPvid from the associated entry of the
dot1qPortVlanTable. Given all this information, we create one row of our internal table for each
combination of VLAN identier and port identier. Information such as the bridge address, port
identier, VLAN identier, designated root, designated bridge, and designated port are stored in each
row. This information helps us to create a VLAN spanning tree.
To construct the VLAN spanning tree, the rst entry from the VLANs group entries is selected as
the current entry. If the bridge address and the designated bridge address of the current entry are not
identical, this bridge address is set as the child of the designated bridge address of the spanning tree
and the port number of this entry is marked as the exit port on this bridge, and the designated bridge
port number as the entry port of the designated bridge. If the bridge address and the designated bridge
address of the current entry are identical, then we select the next unvisited entry as the current entry.
The spanning tree is constructed when all the entries of the VLAN identier have been visited. This
procedure provides us with the spanning tree for each VLAN in the network, and gives us a logical
view of the network, for troubleshooting each VLAN separately.
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 177
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
3. SYSTEM DESIGN
In this section we explain our system design. Figure 2 shows the overall architecture of the topology
discovery system. This system follows the clientserver software architecture. The client is a web
client. The administrator or normal user can give inputs to the server module and the server provides
the topology to the client for viewing. The administrator can customize certain devices using the
customization module. The basic customizations that the administrator can conduct are changing
the location, vendor, purpose, or type of device.
The server of a topology discovery system contains four main modules. The rst moduledevice
discoveryuses next hop discovery and an ARP table loader to retrieve the devices in the network; the
SNMP server is responsible for sending SNMP queries to clients and handling concurrent responses.
This is implemented based on a threading mechanism, to enable the simultaneous handling of multiple
requests and responses. The second module is the supporting module for device discovery; this module
helps the device discovery mechanism by grouping the discovered device based on multiple IP
addresses for a single device. This module also discovers device type and based on device type it loads
the SNMP MIB modules for the device in the database. The third modulethe connectivity discovery
modulediscovers connectivity among devices; it takes its input from the database where we stored
the relevant MIB modules for each device. The connectivity discovery module is divided into four
smaller modules, for discovering switch-to-switch, switch-to-router, router-to-router, and switch and
router-to-end host connectivity. The last module is the logical topology discovery module, which is
responsible for discovering subnet and VLAN topologies; it takes input from the database and uses a
connectivity discovery algorithm to discover connectivity for each subnet and VLAN.
Figure 3 shows the internal data structure and relationship among the tables of the topology. All the
elds in the database are mapped to the MIBs outlined in Table 1. A unique identier for each
discovered device is generated using the singleton class identier. Our program has only one instance
of the identier class, and this class is responsible for generating a unique key for each new device. The
IP address is not used as an identier, since there can be multiple IP addresses belonging to one device.
For the devices supporting SNMP, MIB modules such as system, iftable, ipRouteTable, ipAddrTable,
ipNetToMediaTable, vtpVlanState, and dot1dBrige (see Table 1) are stored in the appropriate database
tables, as shown in Figure 3. IP address, forwarding info, sysService, and sysDesc are stored in
IPTable. In RouteTable, the next hop information is stored. The multiple addresses belonging to a
device, such as the router and switch for each subnet, are stored in AddressTable. In InterfaceTable, we
store the information about the interfaceswhich are also called portsof the switches and routers.
Figure 2. Overall architecture for topology discovery.
178 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
Each interface of the device also has a physical address, an ifIndex, and an interface description. When
we nd the connectivity between the devices, we also nd the interface-to-interface connectivity
between the devices supporting Bridge-MIB. NetToMediaTable stores the device lists that are reach-
able from the node; it also stores the mapping of the physical address with the IP address.
BridgeMIBtable stores the Bridge-MIBs of all the L2 devices. VlanTable is an optional table; if the
network comprises devices other than Cisco, then we use this table to calculate the VLAN and the
spanning tree associated with the VLAN. Once we update the database with all the device information,
we start nding the connectivity and build the ConnectivityTable, which is our output table that helps
generate topology views.
4. IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
In this section we present the implementation details and describe functionality and views of our
system; we will also evaluate our system compared to other research work. We used Advent Net Java
APIs [11] for the SNMP library. These APIs offer a comprehensive development tool kit for SNMP-
based network management applications. An important aspect of the discovery tool is the ability to
view a network map; thus JGraphT [8], a free Java graph library that provides mathematical graph-
theory objects and algorithms, is used.
We provided various types of abstraction of the network view, and each abstraction is implemented
by each menu in our system. There are four main menus: List View, Tree View, Graph View, and VLAN
View. There are three submenus: Device View, All Device View, and Subnet View under Tree View and
Graph View. Also, there are two submenus: Switch ,VLAN and VLAN ,Switch under VLAN View.
Graph view and Tree view are used in combination: the graph module shows connectivity among L3
devices, and once we click on the L3 device in graph, the detailed L2- and lower-level devices are
shown in tree format in the next frame. Since there can be cycles in the L3-level connectivity, the
connectivity cannot be shown using the tree. When we click on the nodes in the graph, the tree attached
to each node of the graph can be seen in the next frame. Since the L2 devices support the spanning tree,
there will consequently be no loop at this level, and we can show this level connectivity with a tree
form. Figure 4 shows a graph view of the L3 devices in the left frame and a tree view of the L2 devices
in the right frame. Showing the connectivity in tree form has various advantages, including the ability
Figure 3. ER diagram for topology database.
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 179
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
to expand and contract the nodes and see the network hierarchy. Moreover, showing all the devices of
the network in one layout is difcult, so this level of abstraction helps in viewing network connectivity.
After double-clicking on each device, various properties of the device, such as device IP addresses,
sysServices, forwarding info, system description, the support of different network layers, multiple
subnets that a given device belongs to, interface details, the connectivity details of each interface, and
some administrator custom entries can be viewed in a separate window. We can view the same window
in the right frame of Figure 5.
Figures 5 and 6 show the subnet view and VLAN view, respectively. The left frame lists all the
subnets and VLANS available in the network. The next frame shows the connectivity among the
devices of the subnet and VLAN in the tree view. Subnet and the VLAN views are signicant as they
show the logical abstraction of the network.
Now we will explain results retrieved after running our algorithm on different networks. We applied
our system to two different enterprise networks: POSTECH and Korea University. Using our tool we
found that in Korea University there are total of 2019 devices, including 14 routers and L3 switches,
29 L2 switches, ve L4 switches, 42 subnets, and 28 VLANs. In POSTECH we found a total of 7495
devices, including 522 L2 switches, eight routers, 76 L3 switches, ve L4 switches, 208 subnets, and
149 VLANs.
The SNMP mechanism with an ARP cache table (NetToMediaTable) is used in our methods to
discover the devices. We loaded the ARP cache of all the routers and switches; in this way, we were
able to discover almost all the devices on the network. We noticed that the numbers of L2/L3/L4/L7
switches, routers, subnets, and VLANs discovered in multiple tests were the same, but that the number
of discovered end hosts varied, with an error range of 12%. The cause of this error is the ARP cache
table, which also contains inactive devices; furthermore, the entries in the ARP cache are not aged out,
so in those situations some extra devices were discovered. We veried our results with the actual data
existing with the POSTECH network administrators, and we found that we discovered 99% of the
devices correctly; however, there was a 1% error of extra devices, i.e., those that were no longer active.
In the case of connectivity discovery among the devices, there were many L2 switchessuch as
BlackDiamond switches [19]that do not support SNMP. For such devices, we could not discover the
connectivity.
Figure 4. Graph view of L3 and tree view of L2 devices in POSTECH.
180 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
We introduced a thread mechanism for resource discovery with the ARP cache module, as this
module consumes most of the time. In this module, the NetToMedia table for routers and switches are
retrieved and snmpget message is sent to each device in the NetToMedia table. Scalability testing
shows a normal linear trend: if the number of devices increases, then the amount of time taken to
discover the device also increases linearly. This trend can be seen in Figure 7 for POSTECH and in
Figure 8 for Korea University. We recorded the time taken for discovering 100 devices, and then
increased the number of devices by 200, 300, and 400 to 7000. However, some packet loss was found
if we increased the number of threads in this process, which primarily depend on the processing power
of the machine, bandwidth, and the underlying SNMP server implementation. Our code works well
Figure 5. Subnet view, showing list of subnets, connectivity among devices in subnet and properties
of the device.
Figure 6. VLAN view, showing list of VLANs, devices in VLANs and connectivity among
the devices.
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 181
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
with 10 simultaneous threads. Time-out for the snmpget request was set to 5 seconds for the tests
shown in Figures 7 and 8. By reducing the time out to 3 and 1 seconds the overall time of execution
was reduced by 34% and 55%, respectively.
After running our tests several times we made various conclusions, and compared the benets of our
work with the current state of the art. Table 2 shows a comparison of previous research with the
proposed method and explains the benets of our algorithm. We utilized the SNMP mechanism to
discover devices and connectivity; therefore, our algorithms are faster and generate less trafc. In
terms of completeness, we discovered many type of devices, and also discovered connectivity among
those devices in efcient ways. Using single-thread and 1-second SNMP time-out, discovering 7495
devices takes approximately 5 hours. Using 10 threads it takes 50 minutes. Connectivity discovery for
7495 devices only took 10 minutes 40 seconds. We discovered VLANs and subnet connectivity, which
provides us with a logical view of the network. Our experiments were done on large networks with
thousands of devices, and hundreds of VLAN and subnets.
5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
In this paper, we extended the work of others by introducing a heuristic-based algorithm to connect the
end host with a network and showing logical (subnet and VLAN level topology) as well as physical
topologies. We discovered different types of devices, including routers, L2/L3/L4/L7 switches, print-
ers, MIB-enabled devices and end hosts, and enhanced the already existing technique of device type
discovery. We utilized the SNMP mechanism, which is the most efcient and generates the least
amount of trafc in comparison to mechanisms in previous research. Our work can act as a guideline
for implementing an SNMP-based topology discovery system. Our extensive tests are signicant in
terms of efciency and the number of devices discovered. This work can be extended by integrating it
with weather maps or monitoring tools to provide greater management functionality. Our future goals
include integrating more link characteristicssuch as link capacity and mean delayto the links, and
discovering connectivity for the L2 switches, such as the BlackDiamond switch, which does not
support SNMP. For greater accuracy, our end host connectivity algorithm needs more renement. We
also plan to nd a way to reduce the discovery and connectivity time. We aim to acquire a mechanism
to perform fast topology update functionality as well. Various analyses of changes to topology will also
be done in the future, which could help us discover the growth patterns of networks.
Figure 7. Threaded discovery of POSTECH.
Figure 8. Threaded discovery of Korea
University.
182 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by the IT R&D program of MKE/KEIT (KI003594, Novel Study on
Highly Manageable Network and Service Architecture for New Generation) and by the WCU (World
Class University) program through National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science and Technology (R31-2008-000-10100-0).
REFERENCES
1. Siamwalla R, Sharma R, Keshav S. Discovering internet topology. Technical report, Cornell University, May 1999.
2. Breitbart Y, Garofalakis M, Jai B, Martin C, Rastogi R, Silberschatz A. Topology discovery in heterogeneous IP networks:
the NetInventory system. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2004; 12(3): 401414.
3. Lowekamp B, OHallaron DR, Gross TR. Topology discovery for large Ethernet networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, San Diego,
CA, August 2001; 237248.
4. Nazir F, Tarar TH, Javed F, Suguri H, Ahmad HF, Ali A. Constella: a complete IP network topology discovery solution. In
APNOMS 2007, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, October 2007; 425436.
5. Cisco. How to get dynamic CAM entries (CAM table) for catalyst switches using SNMP. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/
tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094a9b.shtml [12 June 2010].
6. Cisco. SNMP community string indexing. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_
note09186a00801576ff.shtml [12 June 2010].
7. CISCO-VTP-MIB. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a00801576ff.shtml [12
June 2010].
8. JGraphT. Implementation and source code. http://jgrapht.sourceforge.net/ [12 June 2010].
9. Bierman A, Jones K. Physical topology MIB. IETF RFC-2922, September 2000.
10. Bobelin L, Muntean T. Algorithms for Network Topology Discovery using End-to-End Measurements. In Proceedings of
the 2008 International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2008: 267274.
11. AdventNet. AdventNet SNMP API. http://snmp.adventnet.com/ [12 June 2010].
12. McCloghrie K, Rose M. Management information base for network management of TCP/IP-based Internets, MIB-II. IETF
RFC 1213, March 1991.
13. Decker E, Langille P, Rijsinghani A, McCloghrie K. Bridge MIB. IETF RFC 1493, July 1993.
14. Bell E, Smith A, Langille P, Rijsinghani A, McCloghrie K. Q-BRIDGE-MIB. IETF RFC 2674, August 1999.
15. Case J, Fedor M, Schoffstall M, Davin J. A Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). IETF RFC-1157, May 1990.
16. Passmore D, Freeman J. The virtual LAN technology report. http://www.3com.com/nsc/200374.html [12 June 2010].
17. IEEE 802.1Q. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Virtual Bridge Local Area Networks, 1998.
18. Donnet B, Friedman T. Internet topology discovery: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 2007; 9(4):
5669.
Table 2. Comparison of network topology discovery methods.
Siamwalla et al.
(1999) [1]
Lowekamp et al.
(2001) [3]
Breitbart et al.
(2004) [2] Nazir (2007) [4] Proposed method
Method Ping/broadcast
ping/traceroute/
zone transfer
DSN server/
SNMP/subnet
guessing algorithm
SNMP SNMP (ICMP
spoong/
heuristics)
SNMP/ping Only SNMP
Types of
devices
discovered
Routers/hosts L2 devices, hubs,
dumb devices
Routers/L2 switches/
hosts
Router/L2, L3
switches/
hosts/printers
Router/L2, L3,
L4, L7 switches/
printers/hosts/MIB
enabled devices
Subnet/
inter-subnet
connectivity
Subnet guessing
algorithms;
heuristics; no
inter-subnet
connectivity
Not supported Inter-subnet
connection,
complicated
formulas
Intelligent
subnet-guessing
algorithms
Subnet map;
inter-subnet
connectivity
VLAN
discovery
Not supported Not supported Complex formulae for
VLAN connectivity
Not supported VLAN supported;
Switch VLAN
and VLAN
Switch map
Performance Compares performance
of SNMP, ping,
traceroute etc.;
SNMP performs
best
No signicant
performance
data
ICMP spoong and
calculating AFT
table at frequent
intervals takes a
long time
No signicant
performance
data
7000 nodes
discovered
SNMP-BASED ENTERPRISE IP NETWORK TOPOLOGY 183
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem
19. Extreme Networks. BlackDiamond core switching products. http://www.extremenetworks.com/products/switching-core-
family.aspx/ [630 June 2010].
20. Product specic MIB, http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/netmgmt/cmtk/mibs.shtml/.
21. Plummer DC. An Ethernet address resolution protocol or converting network protocol addresses to 48.bit Ethernet address
for transmission on Ethernet hardware. IETF RFC 826, November 1982.
22. Mockapetris P. Domain names: concepts and facilities. IETF RFC 1034, November 1987.
23. Torren M. tcptraceroute: a Traceroute implementation using TCP packets. UNIX man page (2001). http://michael.toren.net/
code/tcptraceroute/ [12 June 2010].
24. Sung Y, Rao S, Xie G, Maltz D. Towards systematic design of enterprise networks. ACM CoNEXT, August 2008.
25. Bejerano Y. Taking the skeletons out of the closets: a simple and efcient topology discovery scheme for large Ethernet.
IEEE INFOCOM, April 2006; 113.
26. Wood DCM, Coleman SS, Schwartz MF. Fremont: a system for discovering network characteristics and problems. In
Proceedings of Usenix Winer Conference, January 1993.
27. Carofalakis M, Rastogi R. Data mining meets network management: the Nemesis project. ACM SIGMOD International
Workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, May 2001.
AUTHORS BIOGRAPHIES
Suman Pandey is a researcher in Computer Science and Engineering department at POSTECH. She received her
M.S. from POSTECH, Korea in August 2009. Her research interests include topology discovery and management,
IPTV deployment and machine to machine network management.
Mi-Jung Choi is an assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science, Kangwon National University,
Korea. She received her B.S. degree in CS from Ewha Womans University in 1998, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees
from the Dept. of CSE at POSTECH in 2000 and 2004, respectively. Her research interests include trafc
measurement, and future Internet management.
Young J. Won is a postdoctoral researcher at INRIA, France. He received B. Math (2003) from the University of
Waterloo, Canada, and M.S. (2006) and Ph.D. (2010) from POSTECH, Korea.
James Won-Ki Hong is Professor and Head of Division of IT Convergence Engineering and Dean of Graduate
School for Information Technology, POSTECH, Korea. He received a Ph.D. degree from the University of
Waterloo, Canada in 1991. His research interests include network management, network monitoring and analysis,
ubiquitous computing and convergence engineering. James has served as Technical Chair (19982000), Vice
Chair (20032005) and Chair (20052009) for IEEE Comsoc Committee on Network Operations and Manage-
ment (CNOM). He is serving as Director of Online Content for the IEEE Comsoc. He is a NOMS/IM Steering
Committee Member and a Steering Committee Member of APNOMS. He was a General Co-Chair of 2010
IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS 2010). He is an editorial board member of
IEEE TNSM, JNSM, IJNM, JCN and JTM.
184 SUMAN PANDEY ET AL.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int. J. Network Mgmt 2011; 21: 169184
DOI: 10.1002/nem