Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

1/4 www.batasnatin.com/law-library/criminal-law/general-provisions/1566-sanchez-vs-people-gr-no-179090.

html
LOGIN
HOME SOCIAL NETWORK CONTRIBUTE LAW LIBRARY LAW MCQUIZZER THE BAR FORUMS NOTES VAULT LEGAL FORMS LAW FIRM

Search...
Sanchez vs. People- G.R. No. 179090
Category: Book 1- General Provisions
Sanchez vs. People
G.R. No. 179090, June 5,
2009
FACTS:
Appellant was charged with the crime of Other Acts of Child Abuse
in an Information[6] dated August 29, 2001 which reads:
The undersigned, Second Assistant Provincial Prosecutor, hereby accuses Leonilo Sanchez alias Nilo of Lajog, Clarin, Bohol
of the crime of Other Acts of Child Abuse, committed as follows:
That on or about the 2nd day of September, 2000 in the municipality of Clarin, province of Bohol, Philippines, and within the
jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, acting as a Family Court, the above-named accused, with intent to abuse, exploit and/or
to inflict other conditions prejudicial to the child's development, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously abuse
BATASNATIN THE FIRM

Ads by Google
Browse Music on Google+
Join a hangout, post a pic or see people sharing about
Music on G+
Google.com/+/Music
Failure to Read Response
2/4 www.batasnatin.com/law-library/criminal-law/general-provisions/1566-sanchez-vs-people-gr-no-179090.html
to inflict other conditions prejudicial to the child's development, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously abuse
physically one [VVV],[7] a sixteen (16) year old minor, by hitting her thrice in the upper part of her legs, and which acts are
prejudicial to the child-victim's development which acts are not covered by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, but the
same are covered by Art. 59, par. 8 of P.D. No. 603 as amended; to the damage and prejudice of the offended party in the
amount to be proved during the trial.
The appellant argues that the injuries inflicted by him were minor in nature that it is not prejudicial to the child-victims
development and therefore P.D. No. 603 is not applicable and he should be charged under the Revised Penal Code for slight
physical injuries.
ISSUE:
Whether or not P.D. 603 as amended is applicable to the case at hand.
HELD:
In this case, the applicable laws are Article 59 of P.D. No. 603 and Section 10(a) of R.A. No. 7610. Section 10(a) of R.A. No.
7610 provides:
SECTION 10. Other Acts of Neglect, Abuse, Cruelty or Exploitation and Other Conditions Prejudicial to the Child's
Development.
(a) Any person who shall commit any other acts of child abuse, cruelty or exploitation or be responsible for other
conditions prejudicial to the child's development including those covered by Article 59 of Presidential Decree No. 603, as
amended, but not covered by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, shall suffer the penalty of prision mayor in its minimum
period.
As gleaned from the foregoing, the provision punishes not only those enumerated under Article 59 of Presidential Decree No.
603, but also four distinct acts, i.e., (a) child abuse, (b) child cruelty, (c) child exploitation and (d) being responsible for
conditions prejudicial to the childs development. The Rules and Regulations of the questioned statute distinctly and
separately defined child abuse, cruelty and exploitation just to show that these three acts are different from one another and
from the act prejudicial to the childs development. Contrary to petitioners assertion, an accused can be prosecuted and be
convicted under Section 10(a), Article VI of Republic Act No. 7610 if he commits any of the four acts therein. The prosecution
need not prove that the acts of child abuse, child cruelty and child exploitation have resulted in the prejudice of the child
because an act prejudicial to the development of the child is different from the former acts.
Moreover, it is a rule in statutory construction that the word or is a disjunctive term signifying dissociation and independence
of one thing from other things enumerated. It should, as a rule, be construed in the sense which it ordinarily implies. Hence,
the use of or in Section 10(a) of Republic Act No. 7610 before the phrase be responsible for other conditions prejudicial to
the childs development supposes that there are four punishable acts therein. First, the act of child abuse; second, child
cruelty; third, child exploitation; and fourth, being responsible for conditions prejudicial to the childs development. The fourth
penalized act cannot be interpreted, as petitioner suggests, as a qualifying condition for the three other acts, because an

3/4 www.batasnatin.com/law-library/criminal-law/general-provisions/1566-sanchez-vs-people-gr-no-179090.html
penalized act cannot be interpreted, as petitioner suggests, as a qualifying condition for the three other acts, because an
analysis of the entire context of the questioned provision does not warrant such construal.
Appellant contends that, after proof, the act should not be considered as child abuse but merely as slight physical injuries
defined and punishable under Article 266 of the Revised Penal Code. Appellant conveniently forgets that when the incident
happened, VVV was a child entitled to the protection extended by R.A. No. 7610, as mandated by the Constitution. As
defined in the law, child abuse includes physical abuse of the child, whether the same is habitual or not. The act of appellant
falls squarely within this definition. We, therefore, cannot accept appellant's contention.
Acts committed contrary to the provisions of Section 10(a) in relation to Sections 3(a) and 3(b) No. 1 of Rep. Act No. 7610
and Sec. 59(8) of PD 603, amended.
Newer Phi l i ppi ne Law Resources:
Aggravating Circumstance of Contempt of or with Insult to the Public Authorities -
Public Position as an Aggravating Circumstance -
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES -
Insuperable Cause -
Uncontrollable Fear -
Addi ti onal Law Readi ng:
People vs. Tolentino- Treachery, Dwelling and Nighttime -
PEOPLE V ARBALATE- Self Defense -
Ortega vs. People- G. R. No. 151085 -
Licyayo vs. People- Sufficient Provocation and Intoxication -
Exempting Circumstances -
Popul ar i n BATASnati n:
CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING CRIMINAL LIABILITY - - 8280 Hits
STAGES IN THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME - - 4899 Hits
Justifying Circumstances - - 4818 Hits
PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE - - 3730 Hits
Alternative Circumstances - - 3611 Hits
4/4 www.batasnatin.com/law-library/criminal-law/general-provisions/1566-sanchez-vs-people-gr-no-179090.html
< Prev Next >
0
Tweet Tweet 1

LATEST @ FORUMS
No posts to display.
Sitemap About Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Contact Us
BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Online Law Library
READ MORE
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION
QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW
ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 2006)
Edited and Arranged by:Silliman
University College of Law Batch
2005Updated by:DondeeD BAR-Retake
2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR
EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP
LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE
ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
POPULAR
READ MORE
BATAS PAMBANSA BILA
Batas Pambansa Bilang 129 -
The Judiciary Reorganization Act
of 1980AN ACT REORGANIZING
THE JUDICIARY, APPROPRIATING
FUNDS THEREFOR, AND FOR
OTHER PURPOSES.PRELIMINARY
CHAPTERSection 1. Title. This
Act shall be known as "The
Judiciary Reorgan...
RANDOM
READ MORE
RIGHT TO STRIKE
SSSEA v. CA right to strike At
present, in the absence of any
legislation in government employees
the right to strike, recognizing their
right to do so, or regulating the
exercise of such right, they are
prohibited form striking by express
prohi...
FEATURED