Leadership is vital for any organization's sustained success.
A great leader at top makes a
big difference to his or her organization. Everyone will concur with these statements. Experts in human resources field mention the importance of leaders at all levels, and not ust that of the leadership at the top. !t is not without reason that companies like "#, $roctor % &amble, &E, 'oca 'ola( )*+' etc. have known to put in place processes for developing leaders continuously. #ention this subect, however, to a line manager, or to a sales manager, or any executive in most organizations and you will probably deal with diffident responses. Leadership development -a strategic need? ,he subect of leadership is dealt with in a general way by many organizations. Leadership is usually understood in terms of personal attributes such as charisma, communication, inspiration, dynamism, toughness, instinct, etc., and not in terms what good leaders can do for their organizations. -eveloping leaders falls in ). domain. +udgets are framed and outlays are used with indicators like training hours per employee per year. /hether the good intentions behind the training budgets get translated into actions or not, is not monitored. *uch leadership development outlays that are based on only good intentions and general ideas about leadership get axed in bad times and get extravagant during good times. !f having great or good leaders at all levels is a strategic need, as the above top companies demonstrate and as many leading management experts assert, why do we see such a stop and go approach0 Why is there skepticism about leadership development programs? ,he first reason is that expectations from good 1or great2 leaders are not defined in operative terms and in ways in which the outcomes can be verified. Leaders are expected to achieve' many things. ,hey are expected to turn laggards into high performers, turn around companies, charm customers, and dazzle media. ,hey are expected to perform miracles. ,hese expectations remain ust wishful thinking. ,hese desired outcomes can not be used to provide any clues about gaps in leadership skills and development needs. Absence of a comprehensive and generic 1valid in diverse industries and conditions2 framework for defining leadership means that leadership development effort are scattered and inconsistent in nature. !nconsistency gives bad name to leadership development programs. ,his breeds cynicism 1these fads come and go....2 and resistance to every new initiative. ,his is the second reason why the obectives of leadership development are often not met. ,he third reason is in the methods used for leadership development. Leadership development programs rely upon a combination of lectures 1e.g. on subects like team building, communications2, case studies, and group exercises 1problem solving2, and some inspirational talks by top business leaders or management gurus. *ometimes the programs consist of outdoor or adventure activities for helping people bond better with each other and build better teams. ,hese programs generate 'feel good' effect and in some cases participants 'return' with their personal action plans. +ut in maority of cases they fail to capitalize on the efforts that have gone in. ! must mention leadership coaching in the passing. !n the hands of an expert coach a willing executive can improve his leadership skills dramatically. +ut leadership coaching is too expensive and inaccessible for most executives and their organizations. Leadership -a competitive advantage -uring my work as a business leader and later as a leadership coach, ! found that it is useful to define leadership in operative terms. /hen leadership is defined in terms of what it does and in terms of capabilities of a person, it is easier to assess and develop it. /hen leadership skills defined in the above manner are present at all levels, they impart a distinct capability to an organization. ,his capability gives a competitive advantage to the organization. 3rganizations with a pipeline of good leaders have competitive advantages over other organizations, even those with great leaders only at the top. ,he competitive advantages are4 5. ,hey 1the organizations2 are able to solve problems 6uickly and can recover from mistakes fast. 7. ,hey have excellent horizontal communications. ,hings 1processes2 move faster. ". ,hey tend to be less busy with themselves. ,herefore they have 'time' for outside people. 13ver 89: of internal communications are about reminders, error corrections etc . ,hey are wasteful2 ;. ,heir staff 1indirect2 productivity is high. ,his is one of the toughest management challenges. <. ,hey are good at heeding to signals related to 6uality, customer complaints, shifts in market conditions and customer preferences. ,his leads to good and useful bottom=up communication. ,op leaders tend to have less number of blind spots in such organizations. >. !t is easier to roll out programs for strategic shift and also for improving business processes 1using *ix *igma, ,?#, etc.2. &ood bottom=up communications improve top= down communications too. 8. ,hey re6uire less 'supervision', since they are strongly rooted in values. @. ,hey are better at preventing catastrophic failures. Expectations from good and effective leaders should be set out clearly. ,he leadership development programs should be selected to develop leadership skills that can be verified in operative terms. *ince leadership development is a strategic need, there is a need for clarity about the above aspects. )emant Aarandikar advises companies on business % brand strategy, on business transformation, and for achieving breakthroughs in business processes. )e leverages this expertise in product creation proects for companies along with his design associates. )e coaches business leaders and executives for developing leadership skills. )emant founded Exponient 'onsulting and Learning Leadership. $reviously, )emant was #anaging -irector, &/, &lobal /eighing 1now *artorius #echatronics2 and held position of &eneral #anager at $hilips !ndia. )e is an alumnus of !ndian !nstitute of ,echnology, +ombay, !ndia. Bor 3nsite and online coaching for leadership development, please visit http4CCwww.learning=leadership.comC