0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
35 Ansichten48 Seiten
The Abbey Community Association has managed and developed the South Westminster Action Network since 2010. It is supported by funding from Public Health (previously the Primary Care Trust). It evolved from the South Westminster Regeneration Partnership. This network has themed networks; currently Health & Wellbeing, Neighbourhood, Local Employabiloity and Housing which meet to discuss and share good practice and developments relevant to the south Westminster area. It promotes improved health and wellbeing outcomes in south Westminster by addressing the determinants of healthin the area. community members and service providers together to encourage joint working, better communication, improved services and increased quality of life/health outcomes for communities in south Westminster. Theme meetings are held on a quarterly basis. For more information regarding SWAN and up coming meetings please contact Mohammed Mansour mohammed.mansour@theabbeycentre.org.uk
The Abbey Community Association has managed and developed the South Westminster Action Network since 2010. It is supported by funding from Public Health (previously the Primary Care Trust). It evolved from the South Westminster Regeneration Partnership. This network has themed networks; currently Health & Wellbeing, Neighbourhood, Local Employabiloity and Housing which meet to discuss and share good practice and developments relevant to the south Westminster area. It promotes improved health and wellbeing outcomes in south Westminster by addressing the determinants of healthin the area. community members and service providers together to encourage joint working, better communication, improved services and increased quality of life/health outcomes for communities in south Westminster. Theme meetings are held on a quarterly basis. For more information regarding SWAN and up coming meetings please contact Mohammed Mansour mohammed.mansour@theabbeycentre.org.uk
The Abbey Community Association has managed and developed the South Westminster Action Network since 2010. It is supported by funding from Public Health (previously the Primary Care Trust). It evolved from the South Westminster Regeneration Partnership. This network has themed networks; currently Health & Wellbeing, Neighbourhood, Local Employabiloity and Housing which meet to discuss and share good practice and developments relevant to the south Westminster area. It promotes improved health and wellbeing outcomes in south Westminster by addressing the determinants of healthin the area. community members and service providers together to encourage joint working, better communication, improved services and increased quality of life/health outcomes for communities in south Westminster. Theme meetings are held on a quarterly basis. For more information regarding SWAN and up coming meetings please contact Mohammed Mansour mohammed.mansour@theabbeycentre.org.uk
Manager 7 th May 2014 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 1 Need for project established by surveys & consultation:
English non-speakers vulnerable to isolation
Support for mental wellbeing highest need of BME communities
BME volunteers need tailored support & training
Voluntary organisations key providers of emotional support for BME communities 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 2 To support the BME people (mainly Arabic and Bangladeshi community) Living in Westminster, K&C and H&F
Experiencing challenging personal circumstances
Experiencing symptoms of stress, anxiety or depression,
but are not accessing mental health services at present . 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 3 To train bilingual volunteers to: provide need assessments, emotional support & advocacy to clients,
make appropriate referrals to other services including the mental health services
record case work by writing case notes.
To support BME Community organisations: work with vulnerable clients
enable them to demonstrate the impact of their mental wellbeing work 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 4 The programme ran 2012/14.
Funded by CCG via the BME Health Forum
Ten bilingual volunteers trained by the BME Health Forum
The volunteers training included: basic counselling & advocacy skills
First aid mental health training course .
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 5 To recruit participants: Flyers sent to ACAL members, local partner organisations & stakeholders to recruit.
Word of mouth by volunteers in the local community.
Volunteers taking flyers to local schools, Children Centres, mosques, supplementary schools, friends and relatives.
Referrals received from local organisations
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 6 Each service user received 3-6 one-to-one sessions.
active listening, emotional support and/or advocacy,
signposting and/or escorting to other service providers 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 7 Ethnicity Age group Service Users by Borough Gender Arab 90 18-24 4 Westminster 105 Femal e 112 Bangladeshi 16 25-49 86 K& C 9 Male 8 British 4 50-74 30 H& F 4 Pakistani 1 Over 75 0 Brent 2 Somali 1
Spanish 1
Black African 2
Afghani 2
Scottish 1
French 1
Mixed Race 2
120 120 120 120 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 8 120 service users supported 440 one-to one sessions provided Referrals made to ; IAPT Third Age counselling Gordon hospital Refugees Therapy Centre Marylebone Family Centre Westminster Council Admission Office GPs
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 9 Befriend a Family Westminster Home Start Expert Patient Programme J ob Centre Plus Westminster Age UK Carers Networks Praxis Community Projects Westminster Muslim Welfare Trust Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham CAB
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 10 Rain Trust Cardinal Hume Centre Social Services White City Community Centre Domestic Violence Intervention Project Westminster Housing Options The Abbey Centre Health and Wellbeing Programme( carers group, after school group, physical activities, Diabetes mentoring scheme, Community Interpreting training course) Open Age IT , ESOL and Chatter and Natter group
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 11 Depression Isolation Housing overcrowding Domestic violence Health issues- cancer /overweight/obese Financial problems Dealing with teenagers Arrange marriage Language barriers Older people feeling stress due to need to completing welfare benefits /housing applications 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 12 Homelessness Caring role Loneliness Benefit cap & movement from Westminster Impacts of imprisonment of family member Impacts of Divorce e.g. family break up and stigma Immigrations issues Bereavement
5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 13 Project evaluation is currently underway but initial findings: I am feeling much better after have received counselling The project helped me to move to a bigger accommodation The project helped me to get my income support and accommodation Two volunteer have secured part-time paid employment 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 14 Mrs X is an Arabic women, mid 40s. Single mother with 4 children. Suffering from depression for some time Lacks social support and networks, feels isolated Language barriers complicates dealing with most issues. Her teenage son is involved in gang and drugs issues. Police have arrested son on more than one occasion. Volunteer supported her over five one-to one sessions. She was referred to Abbey Centre physical activities sessions and to Third Age Counselling .I found the support given by Abbey Centre volunteer and TAC was very helpful- I feel much better now- thank you. 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 15 5/27/2014 SW Health and Wellbeing Network meeting 16 Emergency or Not? UNSCHEDULED CARE INSIGHT PROJECT A Report by the
BME Health Forum
Commissioned by the NHS Central London CCG Who was involved BME Health Forum Midaye Healthier life 4 You Abbey Community Centre Marylebone Bangladesh Society Westminster Mind Volunteers and participants CLCCG
Methodology The Forum recruited, via an open recruitment process 5 community organisations that work with clients from deprived communities in the area covered by NHS Central London CCG to deliver the project. A questionnaire was produced by the Forum, the 5 community organisations (staff and volunteers) and the commissioners. Volunteers nominated by the community organisations were trained to interview participants. In total 131 interviews (of 76 questions) were conducted. Selection criteria used to recruit participants: All the participants had to be registered with a GP within the NHS Central London CCG OR Live within the NHS Central London CCG catchment area and not registered with a GP at all
Additionally, the participants had to meet at least one of the following criteria: Patients with long term conditions (LTC) such as diabetes, heart disease etc Parents of children with LTC (e.g. asthma etc) Adults without long term conditions who are frequent users of A&E (e.g. 3 times in the last 2 years) Parents of children without long term conditions who are frequent users of A&E (e.g. 3 times in the last 2 years)
Demography 68% were fluent in English and 32% not fluent in English 30% had used an interpreter 81% were female 73% had LTCs 50% had children under 18, while 19% had children under 18 years old with LTCs 83% were unemployed and of those who were employed, half were in part-time work 87% of the participants were from the BME communities. A & E Attendance 2012/13 38.4% of the population in Westminster is BME 48.6% of the sum total of all A & E attendances was BME Individual groups of categorised BME communities do not represent high A&E usage compared to the different white categories except for the category Any other ethnic group. The Any other ethnic group constitutes 11.1% of the local population and yet has 26% attending A&E Key Findings There was a fairly high number of visits for self to A&E over a period of 2 years 44% went 1 to 2 times 39% went 3 to 4 times 10% went 5 to 6 times 6% went 7 to 8 times Over a period of 2 years 85% of the adult participants had accessed A & E services
Key Findings When asked about their visits to A&E within the last two years and how quickly they felt they needed to be seen, 88% responded that they needed to be seen within 4 hours while no respondents felt they could have waited longer than 12 hours
Just over 50% of the participants were able to see the GP within 12 hours.
When asked why they went to A&E without trying to go to the GP first, 67% replied because they would not be seen quickly enough, rather than because the issue could not be dealt with at a GP practice
Why patient didnt attempt to see GP before A&E? Key Findings 57% felt that A&E offers a better service than their GP practice. When asked why Not gone to GP first, here are some of the reasons
Key Findings 28% thought that GPs offered a better service than A&E
74% felt their healthcare was good or excellent at A&E
63% felt their care was good or excellent at a GP practice
The majority of respondents valued their relationship with their GP practice and particularly their regular GP (when they had one)
Key Findings 82% said they were happy or very happy with their regular GP
75% thought their regular GP was a good or very good listener
21% were unsatisfied very unsatisfied by the way they were treated by reception staff at their GP surgery
Key Findings Respondents were asked what changes would make them go to a GP rather than A&E
59% selected same day appointments 41% better facilities, equipment and tests 17% more faith in the GPs expertise 16% a better relationship with the GP Respondents suggested GP surgeries opened in the evenings and on weekends there seemed little awareness of the other urgent care services A better systems for booking urgent appointments that did not rely on a brief time slot to call and had greater capacity. Recommendations for Primary Care Those who feel that they need urgent care want to be seen quickly and have little awareness of other options besides A&E when their GP practice is closed. The most significant reason for attending A&E rather than a GP practice was the speed with which people could be seen. To rectify this it is recommended: A guarantee to patients that when they have an urgent need they can be seen by a GP in a GP surgery, Urgent Care Centre, Walk-in Centre or Out Of Hours service within 4 hours. Pilot drop in clinics that are open late in the evening (e.g. until midnight) Raise awareness on the availability of Out Of Hours services through direct conversations with patients as this group of patients do not access information though mainstream publicity such as GP practice websites. Ensure every GP practice has an effective and consistent appointments system for seeing urgent cases, particularly children and older people within 4 hours during their opening hours. Work with health professionals about when it is suitable to advise patients to go to A&E. Many patients reported that they were advised to go to A&E by GPs but also by other staff such as pharmacists or receptionists In line with the CLCCGs Better Care, Closer to Home strategy bring certain aspects of the experience of A&E that people value to primary care. Patients reported that at A&E they felt that they were seen by experts, had tests done and felt more involved in their care Where practical investigations should take place in primary care rather than in the hospitals. Inform patients more about GPs Special Interests. If possible refer patients to other GPs who have a particular expertise. Every effort should be made to involve patients in their care so that they do not feel more involved in their care at A&E than at their GP practice. Ensure patients know how to change their GP practice if not happy with their GP wherever possible that patients with language needs have easy access to an interpreter Provide workshops for GPs and Practice staff on what local community organisations are providing that can support patients. GP reception staff should be trained in working with a diverse community and particularly in working with people whose first language is not English and/or people who suffer from anxiety or mental distress Research should be carried out with patients who attend A&E repeatedly to find out why they do so and what would make them decrease the repeated use of A&E Improve referrals to community organisations and to community run health programmes as these may be able to support patients to stay well and to understand how to access NHS services appropriately. Recommendations for changes in A&E and Urgent Care When patients visit A&E inappropriately their experience should be as similar as possible to attending a GP practice. For example: Patients could be told that they cannot be seen at A&E and have an appointment booked for them with a GP where they can be seen with 4 hours. Patients could be seen by a GP at A&E who would follow the same processes as a GP based in the community (same access to tests etc). Ensure that when a patient goes to A&E the staff have access to the patients records to ensure that no unnecessary tests are done or repeated to avoid giving patients the impression that an examination at A&E is more thorough. Recommendations for Changes in Community Provision Community organisations could be involved in delivering a community education programme that raises awareness within different BME communities about when to utilise which NHS services and what the different services provide Make some provision for community health advocacy which could support patients who have unresolved issues with their primary care in order to ensure they are able to access appropriate primary care and do not attend A&E as a default Provide a structured health education programme targeting people who do not speak English that can support people to manage their long term conditions and teach them how to best manage appointments with their GP, book double appointments if needed, and make complaints. Recommendation for changes in the collection of Ethnicity data NHS Trusts delivering A&E and urgent care services for the population of Westminster have a contractual obligation to collect ethnicity data. This needs to be done to a higher standard in order to identify who the 26% attending A&E are in order to target the community education programme towards these groups. Kurdish and Middle Eastern Women Organisation KMEWO is a women's rights organisation strives to Empower Middle Eastern and North African women living in the UK through Support , Campaigning and Education !
Founded in 1999
Registered Charity Company LTD About KMEWO KMEWO objectives : Short & Long term support to women.
Campaign and lobby for positive changes in policy and legislation .
Sharing knowledge and expertise with professionals , peers and service providers.
Empowering women through Education and Training
KMEWO Services: Crisis interventions to women and girls at risk of HBV , FM or FGM ( Telephone helpline and drop in advice)
Advice, information, case work , Para counselling and referral and sign posting to specialist services ( appointments)
Provides Educational courses, workshops and Volunteering and Work placement opportunities to women (LFL Project)
Initiate / support Campaigns and lobbies for positive changes in policy and legislation advocating BME and Refugee womens rights ( FGM project, CHBVF, VAW-WAV)
Held seminars , conferences and raising awareness workshops for service providers on specific issues related to Middle Eastern and North African women (8 th March , 25 th Nov. , HTP before schools events , and etc.) FGM Project : To organise and deliver TEN workshops to : - Raise awareness of FGM and its different types - Discuss cultural and religious barriers to eliminate FGM - Inform about health consequences of FGM - Provide awareness of policy and legislation in the UK .
Focus on KURDISH and ARABIC speaking communities 30% of the work should be with MEN ! According to Stop FGM campaign by WADI organisation in Iraqi Kurdistan : FGM is practiced within Middle East in :Yemen, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, the Kurdish regions of Iraq and Iran, India, Malaysia and Indonesia.
most girls in northern Iraq are likely to have undergone FGM. In some areas, the FGM rate is virtually 100%. The average rate is at 72.7%.
http://www.stopfgmkurdistan.org/study_fgm_iraqi_kurdistan_en.pdf Prevalence of FGM amongst Iraqi Kurdish community in the UK:
No research available No attention given Closed community / politically divided groups Structure of groups outside London
The attention of mainstream services and the government polices are mostly on those who are affected by type 3 FGM ; but many women from ME has fallen in the gaps because of being subjected t type 1 FGM.. This means that there are no appropriate services especially counselling and therapeutic services for those who are affected by type 1 FGM.
FGM within Iraqi Kurdish community in the UK:
Class differences
City and rural area differences
Religious believes / statues of local religious clerics
Educational background
Tribal and family issues
Generation gaps between women ( higher statues of mothers in law , grand mothers and outspoken women)
The role of local womens organisations
Kurdish and Middle Eastern Women Organisation Office Numbers : 020 7263 1027 10.00 am- 5.00 pm ( Mon- Fri) 020 7708 0057 10.00 am -5.00 pm ( Thu & Fri) 07748851125 Any time Languages spoken : English , Kurdish Sorani & Krmanji Arabic , Turkish and Farsi www.kmewo.com Info@kmewo.com