Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
c
m
-
1
Figure 1. Plot of specific conductivity vs. concentraion of CTAB in 0.1 volume
fraction of methanol at 308.15 K.
1
3
5
7
9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
323.15 K
318.15 K
308.15 K
Volume Fractions of Methanol-Water
C
M
C
(
m
M
)
Figure 2. Variation of cmc with different volume fractions of methanol-water
at (308.15, 318.15 and 323.15) K.
interactions and on the property of solvent. The addition
of cosolvent changes the dielectric constant of solvent
and the degree of structuring. The more cosolvent is
added, the lower is the dielectric constant of the mixtures
and the micelles expand. The cosolvent molecules at the
micelle/solution interface lower the repulsion between
`
Adv. J. Phys. Sci. 14
Table 2. The critical micellar concentration (cmc) values of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in absence
and in the presence of KCl from conductometry in methanol-water mixed solvent media containing 0.10,
0.20, 0.30 and 0.40 volume fraction of methanol at (308.15, 318.15, and 323.15) K.
Methanol %
Concentration
KCl /M
Critical Micellar Concentration(cmc)/mM
308.15 K 318.15 K 323.15 K
0.10 volume fraction of methanol
0.0000 1.37 1.68 1.79
0.0001 1.32 1.54 1.70
0.0010 1.10 1.22 1.40
0.0100 0.89 0.94 1.18
0.20 volume fraction of methanol
0.0000 1.80 2.63 2.81
0.0001 1.75 2.53 2.68
0.0010 1.13 2.48 2.58
0.0100 1.07 1.98 2.03
0.30 volume fraction of methanol
0.0000 4.60 5.75 5.81
0.0001 4.50 5.47 5.61
0.0010 4.19 5.42 5.56
0.0100 3.14 5.04 5.23
0.40 volume fraction of methanol
0.0000 7.21 7.49 7.71
0.0001 6.42 7.18 7.20
0.0010 6.19 6.87 6.97
0.0100 4.73 6.78 6.87
CTA
+
head groups due to an increase in the ionic
strength of the bulk phase (Vijlder, 1985). Furthermore,
with the increase in cosolvent concentration, the
hydrophobic interaction between hydrophobic groups of
surfactants is gradually reduced (Ray, 1971), that is, the
micellization potential decreases.
An increase in the volume fraction methanol results in
increase in the viscosity of the medium which eventually
results in the increase in the hydrophobic hydration of the
CTAB; hence the surfactant monomer would prefer to
remain in the bulk than to form the micelle. Moreover, it is
illustrated that presence of methanol decreases the
number of hydrogen bonds between the water molecules
(Farhadian and Shariaty-Niassar, 2009) due to which the
hydrophobic repulsion decreases. Li et al. (2005) studied
the effect of ethanol-water mixed solvent media and
concluded that there is significant increase in the cmc of
CTAB with increase in volume fraction ethanol. Ghosh
and Baghel (2008) carried out investigation on the
micellar properties of benzyldimethyldodecylammonium
bromide in aquo-organic solvent media and discussed
that the addition of organic solvent to water decrease the
dielectric constant and increase the cmc value with
increase in volume fraction of methanol.
It is clear from the Table 2 and Figure 3 that on
increasing the temperature, cmc increases. The effect of
temperature on the micellization is usually discussed in
terms of two opposite factors. First, as the temperature
increases, the degree of hydration of the hydrophilic
group decreases, which favors micellization; however, an
increase in temperature also causes the disruption of the
water structure surrounding the hydrophobic group and
this is unfavorable to micellization. It seems from the data
in Table 2 that this second effect is predominant in the
temperature range studied (Varade et al., 2005). The
value of cmc increases with increase in temperature,
such behavior is also observed by Dubey (2008).
From the data of Table 2, the cmc of the surfactant
CTAB decreases with increasing salt concentration and
the decrease of the cmc with increasing salt
concentration follows the Shinoda equation (Shinoda,
1953) which represents the total counter ion binding to
the micelle at the cmc, that is:
log cmc = A B log(cmc + [KCl]) (1)
where A and B are constants. The plot of log cmc against
log (cmc +[KCl]) is shown in Figure 4. The results of plot
`
Shah et al. 15
3
6
9
305 310 315 320 325
0.4 volume fration of methanol
0.3 volume fraction of methanol
0.2 volume fraction of methanol
0.1 volume fraction of methanol
T / K
C
M
C
/
m
M
Figure 3. Variation of CMC with temperature at different volume fractions of
methanol water.
-3.3
-3.0
-2.7
-2.4
-2.1
-1.8
-3.0 -2.7 -2.4 -2.1 -1.8 -1.5
0.4 volume fraction of methanol
0.3 volume fraction of methanol
0.2 volume fraction of methanol
0.1 volume fraction of methanol
Log ( cmc + [KCl] )
L
o
g
c
m
c
Figure 4. Plot of log (CMC+[KCl]) vs log CMC in different volume fractions of methanol-
water at 308.15 K.
in Figure 4 are listed in Table 3. The correlation
coefficients of fits (as r
2
) are higher than 0.900 numerical
value. Hence, the fitting of the data looks good. It Is seen
that the cmc values of CTAB in 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4
volume fractions of methanol solution decreases with
increase of KCl concentration. As the salt is added, the
`
Adv. J. Phys. Sci. 16
Table 3. Linear Regression Analysis of the cmc: The correlation
coefficients of fits (as r
2
) and A and B are constants in methanol-
water mixed solvent media containing 0.10, 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40
volume fraction of methanol at 308.15 K.
Volume fraction of methanol A B r
2
0.1 -3.40 0.174 0.913
0.2 -3.25 0.269 0.993
0.3 -3.13 0.331 0.991
0.4 -3.01 0.375 1.000
electrostatic repulsive force between ionic head groups of
the surfactant molecules is reduced by shielding of
micelle charge, so that spherical micelles are more
closely packed by the surfactant ions (Aswal and Goyal,
2002; Shinoda, 1953), hence a decrease in the cmc
values after adding 0.0001, 0.001 and 0.01 M
concentrations of KCl.
CONCLUSIONS
The effects of concentration, temperature and solvent
composition on the conductance of CTAB in absence and
presence of KCl in methanol (1) + water (2) mixed solvent
media have been studied by measuring specific
conductance through conductometric method. The
following conclusions have been drawn from the results
and discussion. The specific conductivities are found to
increase with increase in concentration over the entire
concentration range investigated whereas the specific
conductivities of CTAB decrease with increase in volume
fraction of methanol. Also, the specific conductivities of
CTAB in presence of KCl are found more than in absence
of KCl in methanol-water mixed solvent media. The cmc
of CTAB increases with increase in temperature and with
increase in volume fractions of methanol and cmc
decreases with addition of KCl in methanol-water mixed
solvent media.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
One of the authors (Sujit Kumar Shah) is thankful to
University Grants Commission for financial support in
order to pursue the Ph.D. work. The authors are thankful
to the faculties of Central Department of Chemistry,
Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal for valuable
suggestions during the research works. The authors are
also thankful to Associate Professor Ghanashyam
Shrivastav, the Head of Department of Chemistry,
Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan
University, Biratnagar, Nepal for providing us the
research facilities to conduct this research work.
Especially Sujit Kumar Shah is highly obliged of Honble
Geeta Didi and her learned team members, Brahma
Kumaris Meditation Centre, Biratnagar, Nepal, for
inspiration and guidance.
REFERENCES
Akbas H, Kartal C (2006). Conductometric studies of
hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous
solutions of ethanol and ethylene glycol. Colloid J. 68:
125 - 130.
Albright PS, Gasting LJ (1946). Dielectric constants of
methanol-water system from 5 to 55
0
. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 68: 1061 - 1063.
Apelblat A (2011). Representation of electrical
conductances for polyvalent electrolytes by the Quint-
Viallard conductivity equation. Part 4. Symmetrical 2:2,
3:3 and unsymmetrical 2:1, 3:1 and 1:3 type
electrolytes in pure organic solvents. J. Sol. Chem.
40(7): 1234 - 1257.
Aswal VK, Goyal PS (2002). Role of counterion
distribution on the structure of micelles in aqueous salt
solutions: small-angle neutron scattering study. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 357: 491 - 497.
Bhattarai A, Chatterjee SK, Deo TK, Niraula TP (2011).
Effects of concentration, temperature, and solvent
composition on the partial molar volumes of sodium
lauryl sulphate in methano(1)+water(2) mixed solvent
media. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 56: 3400 - 3405.
Bhattarai A, Nandi P, Das B (2006). The effects of
concentration, relative permittivity and temperature on
the transport properties of sodium
polystyrenesulphonate in methanol-water mixed solvent
media. J. Polym. Res. 13: 475 - 482.
Carr C, Riddick JA (1951). Physical properties of
Methanol-Water System. Indust. and Engg. Chem. 43:
692 - 696.
Chakraborty T, Chakraborty I, Ghosh S (2006). Sodium
carboxymethylcellulose-CTAB interaction: A detailed
thermodynamic study of polymer-surfactant interaction
with opposite charges. Langmuir. 22(24): 9905 - 9913.
Chatterjee A, Das B (2006). Electrical conductances of
tetrabutylammonium bromide, sodium
tetraphenylborate, and sodium bromide in methanol (1)
+ water (2) mixtures at (298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K.
J. Chem. Eng. Data. 51: 1352 - 1355.
Chlebicki J, Wegrzynska I, Oswiecimska (2005).
Preparation, surface-active properties and antimicrobial
activities of bis-quaternary ammonium salts from
amines and epichlorohydrin. J. Sufract. Deterg. 8: 227 -
`
232.
Chung JJ, Lee SW, Choi JH (1991). Salt effects on the
critical micelle concentration and counter ion binding of
cetylpyridinium bromide micelles. Bull. Korean Chem.
Soc. 12: 411-413.
Dubey N (2008). A Conductometric Study of Interaction
between Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and 1-Propanol, 1-
Butanol, 1-Pentanol and 1-Hexanol at Different
temperatures. J. Surface Sci. Technol. 24(3-4): 139-
148.
Fujiwara M, Okano T, Nakashima TH, Nakamura AA,
Sugihara G (1997). A temperature study on critical
micellization concentration (CMC), solubility, and
degree of counter binding of -sulfonatomyristic acid
methyl ester in water by electroconductivity
measurements. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 275: 474-479.
Gonzalez-Perez A, Czapkiewicz J, Del Castillo JL,
Rodiriguez JR (2003). Micellar properties of
octyldimethylbenzylammonium bromide in water.
Colloid Polym. Sci. 281: 556 561.
Gonzalez-Perez A, Czapkiewicz J, Del Castillo JL,
Rodiriguez JR (2002). Micellization of decyl- and
dodecyldimethylbenzylammonium bromices at various
temperatures in aqueous solutions. Colloid Polym. Sci.
280: 503-5008.
Gutmann H, Kertes AS (1974). Cationic Surfactants in
Organic Solvents. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 51: 406-411.
Joestor D, Losson M, Pugin R, Heinzelmann H, Walter E,
Merkel HP, Diederich F (2003). Amphiphilic
dendrimers: novel self-assembly vectors for efficient
gene delivery. Angewandte Chemie International
Edition. 42: 1486 - 1490.
Li W, Han YC, Zhang JL, Wang LX, Song J (2006).
Thermodynamic modeling of CTAB aggregation in
water-ethanol mixed solvents. Colloid J. 68: 304 310.
Lind JE Jr, Zwolenik JJ, Fuoss RM (1959). Calibration of
Conductance Cells at 25C with Aqueous Solutions of
Potassium Chloride, J. of American Chem. Soci.
81:1557 1559.
Manna K, Panda AK (2011). Physicochemical studies on
the interfacial and micellization behavior of CTAB in
aqueous polyethylene glycol media. J. Surfact. Deterg.
14: 563 576.
Mikhail SZ, Kimel WR (1961). Densities and Viscosities
of Methanol-Water Mixtures. J. Chem. Engg. Data 6:
533 537.
Miyagishi S (1974). Effect of organic additives on micelle
formation of dodecylammonium halides in aqueous
solution. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 74: 2972 2976.
Moulik SP, Haque Md E, Jana PK, Das AR (1996).
Micellar properties of cationic surfactants in pure and
mixed states. J. Phys. Chem. 100: 701 708.
Palepu R, Gharibi H, Bloor DM, Para E, Wyn-Jones P
Shah et al. 17
(1993). Electrochemical studies associated with the
micellization of cationic surfactants in aqueous mixtures
of ethylene glycol and glycerol. Langmuir 9: 110 112.
Prasad CD, Singh HN (1990). Effect of Alcohols and
temperature on the Structural Transitions of CTAB
micelles in Aqueous Potassium Bromide solution.
Colloid Surfaces. 50: 37 45.
Ray A (1971). Solvophobic interactions and micelle
formation in structure forming nonaqueous solvents.
Nature. 231: 313 315.
Ruiz CC (1999). Thermodynamics of micellization of
tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide in ethylene
glycol water binary mixture. Colloid Polym. Sci. 277:
701 - 707.
Schramm LL, Stasiuk EN, Marangoni (2003). Surfactants
and their applications. Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem. Sect.
C. 99: 3 48.
Shinoda K (1953). The effect of chain length, salt and
alcohols on critical micelle concentration. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 26: 101 - 105.
Simmonnic B, Span J (1998). Thermodynamics of
micellization of N-alkyl pyridinium chlorides: a
potentiometric study. Acta. Chim. Slov. 45: 143 152.
Singh HN, Swarup S, Saleem SM (1979). Effect of
electrolytes on the micellization of ionic surfactants in
n-alkanol-water mixtures. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 68: 128
134.
Srinivas R, Samanta S, Chaudhari A (2009). Cationic
amphiphiles: promising carriers of genetic materials in
gene therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38: 3326 3338.
Tanford C (1980). The hydrophobic effect-formation of
micelles and biological membranes, 2
nd
ed Wieley, New
York.
Varade D, Joshi T, Aswal VK, Goyal PS, Hassand PA,
Bahadur P (2005). Effect of salt on the micelles of cetyl
pyridinium chloride. Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 259: 95 101.
Vijlder M De (1985). Ion-pair formation as a determining
factor in effectiveness of the interaction of electrolytes
with amphiphilic azo dye in water. J. Chem. Soc.
Frarad. Trans. I. 81: 1369 1373.
Yilmaz H, Guler S(1998). Excess properties of methanol-
water binary system at various temperatures. Il Nuovo
Cimento D. 20(12): 1853 1861.
Zana R (1995). Aqueous surfactant-alcohol system: a
review. Adv.Colloid Inter. Sci. 57: l - 64.
Zana R, Yiv S, Strazielle C, Lianos P (1980). Effect of
Alcohol on the properties of Micellar System. J. Colloid
Inter. Sci. 80:208 223.
Zhao T, Sun G (2008). Hydrophobicity and antimicrobial
activities of quaternary pyridinium salts. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 104: 824 - 830.