100%(1)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (1 Abstimmung)
583 Ansichten1 Seite
The document provides three key reasons why ammonia is used instead of liquid nitrogen for cooling on the International Space Station:
1) Ammonia cycles between liquid and gas in a closed cooling system, requiring only energy input from solar panels to function. Liquid nitrogen would need to be continuously resupplied from Earth at great expense.
2) Ammonia conducts heat much more efficiently than nitrogen, which is important for heat exchange in a refrigeration system. It is also easier to liquefy, making the system more energy efficient.
3) A cost-benefit analysis likely determined that while liquid nitrogen could be used, ammonia was a better option given engineering considerations like its superior heat transfer properties and
Originalbeschreibung:
describe about benefit between nitrogen againts ammonia for freezer
The document provides three key reasons why ammonia is used instead of liquid nitrogen for cooling on the International Space Station:
1) Ammonia cycles between liquid and gas in a closed cooling system, requiring only energy input from solar panels to function. Liquid nitrogen would need to be continuously resupplied from Earth at great expense.
2) Ammonia conducts heat much more efficiently than nitrogen, which is important for heat exchange in a refrigeration system. It is also easier to liquefy, making the system more energy efficient.
3) A cost-benefit analysis likely determined that while liquid nitrogen could be used, ammonia was a better option given engineering considerations like its superior heat transfer properties and
The document provides three key reasons why ammonia is used instead of liquid nitrogen for cooling on the International Space Station:
1) Ammonia cycles between liquid and gas in a closed cooling system, requiring only energy input from solar panels to function. Liquid nitrogen would need to be continuously resupplied from Earth at great expense.
2) Ammonia conducts heat much more efficiently than nitrogen, which is important for heat exchange in a refrigeration system. It is also easier to liquefy, making the system more energy efficient.
3) A cost-benefit analysis likely determined that while liquid nitrogen could be used, ammonia was a better option given engineering considerations like its superior heat transfer properties and
I guess that they could store liquid nitrogen cause vacuum is essentially cold (if properly shielded from sun), and ammonia is pretty toxic so, what is really the advantage of having ammonia rather than nitrogen on the international space station? Answer : - iquid nitrogen a!sor!s heat as it evaporates, and would have to !e continuously replenished with supplies shipped from the surface of the "arth at great expense# $he ammonia is used as a refrigerant in a closed cooling system, %ust li&e your household refrigerator or air conditioner (which pro!a!ly uses '-()*, a different chemical)# $he ammonia cycles !etween liquid and gaseous state in a closed loop# All it needs is energy, which is supplied in or!it from the solar panels# - Ammonia conducts heat much more than nitrogen# It is li&e comparing steel to styrofoam# $his is important !ecause a refrigeration system is a heat exchange engine# As the gas is compressed it releases heat and as it expands it a!sor!s heat# Ammonia is also easier to liquify than nitrogen, so there is less wor& involved for the compressor# $his ma&es an ammonia refrigeration system more efficient in terms of energy# In fact, the first refrigerators used ammonia instead of the chlorofluorocar!ons they do today# +ar!on dioxide a!sor!s and releases heat even !etter, !ut liquid +,- has the tendency to solidify easily and this %ams the compressor# ,f course water is the !est, !ut the vapor exists at a far higher temperature than people can tolerate, so this gas is !est used in steam tur!ines# - If you &new anything a!out the thermodynamics of cooling, then I don.t thin& you.d !e as&ing this question#I do /,$ &now why they use /0) compared to the other refrigerant gasses they could have selected, possi!ly its weight, !ut /- would have !een a very very poor choice# 0ow does refrigerant wor&? 1o you even &now? /o, you don.t# 0ere is a lin&### -2- Its not that /- can.t !e used# I assume that its use was considered and dismissed after a cost3ris&3!enefit analysis# -2- I am amused !y your claim that vacuum is cold# 4hy don.t you loo& up the temperature? -2- ,f course, vacuum doesn.t have a 5real5 temperature# 6ou should &now that# $he temperature of the gas and plasma actually present in outer space is quite high# ,f course, if cooling is predominantly !y radiation, it may swamp any heating in an extremely low pressure atmosphere# I guess that is what you meant# 7ut of course if its shielded from the sun, then how efficient will radiative cooling !e? Source(s): http:33en#wi&ipedia#org3wi&i3'efrigerant###
How it Works: Dealing in simple language with steam, electricity, light, heat, sound, hydraulics, optics, etc., and with their applications to apparatus in common use