ISLAMOPHOBIA

Introduction
The term "Islamophobia" was first introduced as a concept in a 1991
Runnymede Trust Report and defined as "unfounded hostility towards
Muslims, and therefore fear or dislike of all or most Muslims." The term
was coined in the context of Muslims in the UK in particular and Europe in
general, and formulated based on the more common "xenophobia"
framework.
The report pointed to prevailing attitudes that incorporate the following
beliefs:
Islam is monolithic and cannot adapt to new realities
Islam does not share common values with other major faiths
Islam as a religion is inferior to the West. It is archaic, barbaric, and
irrational.
Islam is a religion of violence and supports terrorism.
Islam is a violent political ideology.
For the purposes of anchoring the current research and documentation
project, we provide the following working definition:
Islamophobia is a contrived fear or prejudice fomented by the existing
Eurocentric and Orientalist global power structure. It is directed at a
perceived or real Muslim threat through the maintenance and extension of
existing disparities in economic, political, social and cultural relations,
while rationalizing the necessity to deploy violence as a tool to achieve
"civilization rehab" of the target communities (Muslim or otherwise).
Islamophobia reintroduces and reaffirms a global racial structure through
which resource distribution disparities are maintained and extended.

Islamophobia is prejudice against, hatred towards, or irrational fear of
Muslims.
In 1997, the British Runnymede Trust defined Islamophobia as the
"dread or hatred of Islam and therefore, [the] fear and dislike of all
Muslims," stating that it also refers to the practice of discriminating against
Muslims by excluding them from the economic, social, and public life of
the nation. The concept also encompasses the opinions that Islam has no
values in common with other cultures, is inferior to the West and is a
violent political ideology rather than a religion.
Islamophobia was recognized as a form of intolerance alongside
xenophobia and antisemitism at the "Stockholm International Forum on
Combating Intolerance. The conference, attended by UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan, High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary
Robinson, the OSCE Secretary General Jn Kubis and representatives of the
European Union and Council of Europe, adopted a declaration to combat
"genocide, ethnic cleansing, racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia and
xenophobia, and to combat all forms of racial discrimination and
intolerance related to it." Some scholars of the social sciences consider it a
form of racism, although this is debated. But this is controversial.
A perceived trend of increasing Islamophobia and Islamophobic
incidents during the 2000s has been attributed by commentators to the
September 11 attacks, while others associate it with the increased presence
of Muslims in the Western world. In May 2002, the European Monitoring
Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), a European Unionwatchdog,
released a report entitled "Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after
11 September 2001", which described an increase in Islamophobia-related
incidents in European member states post-9/11. Although the term is
widely recognized and used, both the term and the underlying concept
have been criticized.
History of the term
One early use cited as the term's first use is by the painter Alphonse
tienne Dinet and Algerianintellectual Sliman ben Ibrahim in their 1918
biography of Islam's prophet Muhammad. Writing in French, they used the
term islamophobie. Robin Richardson writes that in the English version of
the book the word was not translated as "islamophobia", but rather as
"feelings inimical to Islam". Dahou Ezzerhouni has cited several other uses
in French as early as 1910, and from 1912 to 1918. These early uses of the
term did not, according to Christopher Allen, have the same meaning as in
contemporary usage, as they described a fear of Islam by liberal Muslims
and Muslim feminists, rather than a fear or dislike/hatred of Muslims by
non-Muslims. On the other hand, Fernando Bravo Lopez argues that Dinet
and ibn Sliman's use of the term was as a criticism of overly hostile
attitudes to Islam by a Belgian orientalist, Henri Lammens, whose project
they saw as a "'pseudo-scientific crusade in the hope of bringing Islam
down once and for all.'" He also notes that an early definition of
Islamophobia appears in the Ph.D. thesis of Alain Quellien, a French
colonial bureaucrat:
For some, the Muslim is the natural and irreconcilable enemy of the
Christian and the European; Islam is the negation of civilization, and
barbarism, bad faith and cruelty are the best one can expect from the
Mohammedans. Furthermore, he notes that Quellien's work draws heavily
on the work of the French colonial department's 1902-06 administrator,
who published a work in 1906, which to a great extent mirrors John
Esposito's The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?.
Richardson states that the first English print usage was Edward Said's 1985
article "Orientalism Reconsidered". Another early documented use of the
word was by the American news magazine Insight on the News in 1991,
used to describe Russian activities in Afghanistan, and this is the usage
listed by the Oxford English Dictionary. The term entered into common
usage with the publication of the Runnymede Trust's report in 1997. Kofi
Annan asserted at a 2004 conference entitled "Confronting Islamophobia"
that the word Islamophobia had to be coined in order to "take account of
increasingly widespread bigotry".

Contrasting views on Islam
The Runnymede report contrasted "open" and "closed" views of Islam, and
stated that the following eight "closed" views are equated with
Islamophobia:
1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2. It is seen as separate and "other." It does not have values in common
with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence
them.
3. It is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational,
primitive, and sexist.
4. It is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism,
and engaged in a clash of civilizations.
5. It is seen as a political ideology, used for political or military
advantage.
6. Criticisms made of "the West" by Muslims are rejected out of hand.
7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices
towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal.
These "closed" views are contrasted, in the report, with "open" views on
Islam which, while founded on respect for Islam, permit legitimate
disagreement, dialogue and critique. According to Benn and Jawad, The
Runnymede Trust notes that anti-Muslim discourse is increasingly seen as
respectable, providing examples on how hostility towards Islam and
Muslims is accepted as normal, even among those who may actively
challenge other prevalent forms of discrimination.






















References
1. Abu Sway, M. (2006). Islamophobia: Meaning, Manifestation, Causes.
In H. Schenker & Z. Abu-Zayyad (Eds.)
2. Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism (pp. 13-23). Princeton: Markus
Wiener.Allen, C. (2007). Islamophobia and its consequences. In S.
Amghar, A. Boubekeur, & M.Emerson (Eds.)
3. European Islam Challenges for public policy and society(pp. 144-
167).Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies