100%(1)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (1 Abstimmung)
151 Ansichten55 Seiten
The document discusses selecting the correct generator capacity for standby power systems. It explains that generators are required by law to provide secondary power for fire services like fire pumps. The size of the generator must be able to handle the starting surge of large motors like fire pumps. The document provides examples of sizing a generator to account for a 50HP fire pump starting load as well as steady essential loads of 200kW. It recommends a 500-600kVA generator in this case to adequately provide standby power.
Originalbeschreibung:
10 Common Practice Problems Electrical Part 1
Originaltitel
Common Practice Problems Electrical Part 1 (21May11)
The document discusses selecting the correct generator capacity for standby power systems. It explains that generators are required by law to provide secondary power for fire services like fire pumps. The size of the generator must be able to handle the starting surge of large motors like fire pumps. The document provides examples of sizing a generator to account for a 50HP fire pump starting load as well as steady essential loads of 200kW. It recommends a 500-600kVA generator in this case to adequately provide standby power.
The document discusses selecting the correct generator capacity for standby power systems. It explains that generators are required by law to provide secondary power for fire services like fire pumps. The size of the generator must be able to handle the starting surge of large motors like fire pumps. The document provides examples of sizing a generator to account for a 50HP fire pump starting load as well as steady essential loads of 200kW. It recommends a 500-600kVA generator in this case to adequately provide standby power.
Armada Hotel , Petaling Jaya 26 th May 2011 10 Common Electrical Design Problems Part I Ir. Looi Hip Peu Hon Sec, ACEM (2010/11) B.Eng (Hons) (Electrical) P.Eng (5226), Jurutera Gas hplooi@unifi.my 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my CONTENT 2 System Design Wiring Design Protection Installation Objectives of this Workshop 1. Tariff selection 2. Generator sizing 3. Earthing system 4. PE cable selection 5. Mains cable sizing 6. Al vs Cu cables 7. RCD selection 8. Motor starting 9. Standards 10. Malaysian wiring code What are the Objectives of this Workshop? In the Malaysian context, Electrical engineers are required to design to MS standards and standards approved. This responsibility requires: 1. Understanding design principles 2. Understanding Technical Standards 3. Awareness of latest Standards 4. Staying current in knowledge base The above protects the consultant engineer from claims of negligence. OBJECTIVES OF WORKSHOP 3 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my This Workshop Module List 5 Common Problems ! 1. System design failures 2. Wiring design failures 3. Protection design failures 4. Installation & Other issues OBJECTIVES OF WORKSHOP 4 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my This workshop list 10 common design failures. Failures are grouped as follows: 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Sel ect i ng Tar i f f St r uct ure 1 At desi gn pl anni ng stage t he M&E engi neer i s requi red t o: 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 6 Load and electricity capacity calculations Substation Space Planning Advice Client on Tariff Selection Formal application to TNB. 1 TNB Suppl y Handbook 2007 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 7 1 Vol tage Level Sel ect i on 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 8 MD ranges Supply Voltage Typical Supply Scheme Up to 12kVA 230V Overhead service mains from LV mains 12kVA 100kVA 400V 3 phase o/h or u/g LV existing service mains 100kVA 1000kVA 400V Direct cable service from LV board in substations (single or double chamber) 1000kVA 5000kVA 11kV Directly fed thro TNB 11kV system (11kV switch room 1000kVA 10000kVA 22kV Directly fed thro TNB 11kV system (22kV switch room) 500kVA 25000kVA 33kV Directly fed thro TNB 11kV system (33kV switch room Above 25000kVA 132kV 275kV Directly fed thro TNB 132/275kV system (132/275kV switching stations) 1 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 9 Tariff Unit Rates A (Domestic) sen/kWh 21.8 to 46 sen B (LV Commercial) Up to 200kWh >200kWh sen/kWh sen/kWh 38.0 40.8 C1 (MV General Commercial) MD consumption kWh consumption RM/kW sen/kWh 24.6 29.6 C2 (MV peak/off peak Commercial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours) RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh 36.6 29.6 18.2 D (LV Industrial) Up to 200kWh >200kWh sen/kWh sen/kWh 34.2 36.6 1 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Tariff Unit Rates E1 (MV General Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption RM/kW sen/kWh 24.6 28.0 E2 (MV peak/off peak Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours) RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh 30.8 29.6 18.2 E3 (HV peak/off peak Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours) RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh 29.6 28.6 16.8 The s el ec t i on of vol t age connect i on and t ar i f f s el ect i on have s ome r el at i on. However at bor der l i ne cas es , s ome devi at i ons ar e al l owed. SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 10 1 Sel ec t i ng t ar i f f has c ommer ci al c ons equence 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 11 LV Connection Tariff B/D LV or MV connection <1000kVA 1000kVA 1500kVA >2000kVA MV Connection Tariff C/E Pattern of Consumption, Load Profile General Tariff C1/E1 peak/off peak Tariff C2/E2 1 Cost difference between tariff E1 (higher) & D (lower) at 80% load diversity Cost difference between tariff E1 (higher) & D (lower) at 60% load diversity 1 1 Monthly charge difference between tariff E1 (higher) and E2 (lower) for 3 shifts At only 2 shifts charges under tariff E1 may be lower than tariff E2. 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Common f ai l ur e by i nex per i en c ed pr ac t i t i on er ( i nc l udi n g c ont r ac t or s who advi s e c l i ent s ) ? SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 14 1 No s t udy i s done t o det er mi ne t he c or r ec t t ar i f f s t r uc t ur e dur i ng pl anni ng s t age . Th e wr on g t a r i f f s t r uc t ur e i n c a s e of MD a r oun d 750k VA t o 1. 5k VA i s pr opos ed. Th e wr on g t ar i f f s t r uc t ur e i n c a s e of s e l e c t i on bet we en p ea k /of f p e ak or gen er a l t ar i f f s t r uc t u r e i s pr opos ed. 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Common f ai l ur e by i nex per i en c ed pr ac t i t i on er s ( i nc l udi n g c ont r ac t or s who advi s ed c l i ent s ) ? SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 15 1 Pr e 2006 Tari ff Structure At l ess than 1MVA LV tari ff i s l ower than MV tari ff. For l oad >1MVA and l oad di versi t y >75% MV tar i ff structure i s cheaper. However a detai l l oad anal ysi s need to be executed to determi ne the best tar i f f structure. They exi s t a c l e ar de l i n e at i on b et we en C2/ E 2 ( p ea k / of f p e ak t ar i f f s ) a nd C1/ E 1 ( gen er a l t ar i f f s ) whe n at l e a s t 3 s hi f t s ar e r un . Howe ve r t hi s 3 s h i f t s mu s t b e t r an s l at ed i nt o h i g h k Wh c ons umpt i on dur i n g of f - pe a k h our s . St ud y ne ed t o be done t o as c er t ai n at pl anni n g s t age . 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 16 M o n t h l y C h a r g e s MD kW M o n t h l y C h a r g e s MD kW Pre 2006 Tariff Post 2006 Tariff M o n t h l y C h a r g e s kWh consumption M o n t h l y C h a r g e s kWh consumption 1 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Concl usi on 1. A clear delineation between LV and MV tariff is presented in the post 2006 tariff. The consultant if possible should opt for LV tariff taking into consideration availability and capacity of existing LV network and substations. Planners can also look at the possibility of connection at MV but metering at LV since new rules are being drafted by TNB to force connection at MV even at 500kVA. 2. The post 2006 tariff structure is much less supportive of peak/off peak demand-management. This require a more stringent analysis of load demand and the economics of running 3-shifts. 3. Current TNB supply agreement specify that tariff opted must stay for 5 years before changing tariff in agreement. SYSTEM DESIGN CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION 17 1 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Sel ect i ng Generator Capaci t y 2 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 19 Generator set s are mandatory i n t he fol l owi ng i nst ances: 2 Law / By Law Conditions Standby Generator 1 UBBL Section 243 Fire Lift to be provided for buildings where last occupied floor is 18.5m above fire appliance access level. Standby generator required as 2ndary supply for fire lifts. 2 UBBL Sections 226, 231, 232, 244, 247 etc and 10 Schedule Sprinkler, Wet Riser, Pressurised Hydrants, Hose Reel system(s) to be provided in accordance with occupancy hazard class and built-up area in accordance with Tenth Schedule of UBBL. Standby generator only required if the 2ndary supply to services pumps are NOT diesel engine. 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 20 UBBL Tent h Schedul e; Sec ondar y s uppl y f or Fi r e Ser vi c es 2 Ty p i c a l S c h e me S t a nd by s e r v i c e s f or f i r e p ump i s e l e c t r i c . Ma i ns s t a n dby g e ne r a t or pr o v i de 2 n da r y s up pl y t o s t a n dby e l e c t r i c p u mp . Ma i ns S t a n dby Ge ne r a t or ha s t o b e s i z e d t o c a t e r f or f i r e p ump s t a r t i n g s u r g e 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 21 UBBL Tent h Schedul e; Sec ondar y s uppl y f or Fi r e Ser vi c es 2 Al t e r n a t i v e C a s e 1 S t a nd by s e r v i c e s f or f i r e pu mp d i e s e l e n g i n e . Ma i ns s t a n dby g e ne r a t or n ot r e qu i r e d i f UB BL 2 4 3 d o n o t a p p l y. 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 22 UBBL Tent h Schedul e; Sec ondar y s uppl y f or Fi r e Ser vi c es 2 Al t e r n a t i v e C a s e 2 S t a nd by s e r v i c e s f or f i r e p ump i s d i e s e l e n g i n e . UB BL 2 4 3 ( f i r e l i f t ) r e q u i r e s ma i ns s t a n dby g e n e r a t or. Ma i ns S t a n dby Ge ne r a t or o nl y h a s t o be s i z e d t o c a t e r f or f i r e l i f t s t a r t i n g s u r g e 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 23 2 Ma i n s S t a n d b y g e n e r a t o r n e e d t o c a t e r f o r f i r e p u mp ( 5 0 HP ) s t a r t i n g s u r g e . Ma i n s e s s e n t i a l s u p p l y s t e a d y l o a d 2 0 0 k W. S t a n d b y Ge n e r a t o r : 5 0 0 - 6 0 0 k VA r e q u i r e d , On l y 1 p u m p t o m a i n t a i n . Ma i n s S t a n d b y g e n e r a t o r n e e d t o o n l y t o c a t e r f o r f i r e l i f t s t a r t i n g s u r g e . C a p a c i t y o f s t a n d b y g e n e r a t o r : 2 5 0 k VA . S e p a r a t e 5 0 HP d i e s e l e n g i n e f o r f i r e p u mp . 2 p u m p s t o m a i n t a i n . 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 24 2 Ge ne r at or not s i z ed t o t ake i nt o a c c ount s t ar t i ng s ur ge of l ar ges t mot or i n s ys t e m. Gener at or Sel ec t i on; Common Fai l ur es Ge ne r a t or n ot s i z e d t o t a ke i nt o a c c o u nt s t a r t i ng s u r g e of l a r g e s t mo t o r i n s y s t e m. Generator size = 150kVA Generator size = 250kVA Ge ne r a t or wi l l s t a l l o n l i f t s t a r t i n g ! C or r e c t s i z i ng o f Ge ne r a t or t o t a ke i nt o a c c ou nt l i f t s t a r t i ng s ur g e ( a s s u me 4 x r a t e d ) . 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 25 2 Ge ne r at or not s i z ed t o t ake i nt o a c c ount s t ar t i ng s ur ge of l ar ges t mot or i n s ys t e m. Gener at or Sel ec t i on; Common Fai l ur es Ge ne r a t or n ot s i z e d t o t a ke i nt o a c c o u nt s t a r t i ng s ur g e o f l a r g e s t mo t o r i n s y s t e m. As s ume e s s e nt i a l s t e a dy l o a d = 1 5 0 k VA F i r e pu mp = 7 5 HP & s t a r t i ng s u r g e 5 . 5 x r a t e d Generator size = 250kVA Ge ne r a t or wi l l s t a l l on F i r e P u mp s t a r t i n g ! Generator size = 420kVA (min size) C or r e c t s i z i ng o f Ge ne r a t or t o t a ke i nt o a c c ou nt l i f t s t a r t i n g s u r g e . 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 26 2 Best Pract i ce L ar ge I ns t a l l at i on wh er e s t a ndb y ge ne r at or i s r eq ui r e d un der UBBL 24 3 . Us e s ep ar at e d i es e l engi ne f or s t andby f i r e pump. I n al l c a s e s i z e gen er at or t o c at e r f or s t ar t i n g s ur ge of l ar ge s t mot or : Gener at or Capac i t y = ( St e ad y s t at e of E s s e nt i a l L oad ) ( L es s l ar ge s t mot or ) + ( St ar t i ng s ur ge of l ar ges t mot or ) 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Ear t h Syst em 3 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 28 Many El ec t r i cal Engi neer s ar e st i l l conf us ed on speci f yi ng t ype of ear t hi ng sys t em Wh at ar e t h e t yp e s of e ar t hi n g s ys t ems u s e d i n Mal ays i a wh i c h ar e i n a c c or d anc e wi t h MS , I EC or BS wi r i n g s t andar ds ? 3 EARTHING FOR POWER DISTRIBUTION DEFINITIONS TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 29 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my MS/IEC60364 earthing 2 letters: (a) 1 st letter Transformer neutral: (i) T for connected (ii) I for isolated (b) 2 nd letter; Frame earth: (i) T for directly connected to earth (ii) N for connected to the neutral at the origin of installation. EARTHING FOR POWER DISTRIBUTION DEFINITIONS TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS British IEE or BS7671 has the same definitions. 3 WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 30 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 DEFINITIONS TN-C, TN-S, TN-CS SYSTEMS The TN System can also be sub divided into sub system by the addition of a 3 rd letter: TN-C; N & PE are common (PEN) TN-S; N & PE are separate TN-C-S; TN-C occurs up -stream & TN-S downstream WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 31 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 DEFINITIONS TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS Various sub system can co-exist within one system. WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 32 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 TT System Earth at both ends has 3P and N (4 cables) TNS System Earth at source only, has 3P, N & P.E. (5 cables) WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 33 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 34 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 Malaysia UK (parts) TN-C systemin public distribution TT system in public distribution WIRING DESIGN EARTHING SYSTEM 35 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 3 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 36 3 Network/Operation Criteria System Chosen /Preferred Continuity of service critical and maintenance service available IT chosen Continuity of service critical and consistent maintenance service NOT available No satisfactory solution, TT preferred as discrimination tripping is easier to implement and damages lesser with respect to TN. Continuity of service NOT critical; competent maintenance services available. TN-S chosen (rapid repairs and extension easily performed). Continuity of service NOT critical; competent maintenance service NOT available. No satisfactory solution, TT system preferred. Fire hazard critical and maintenance services available. IT and use of 5mA RCD OR TT system 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 37 3 Network/Operation Criteria System Chosen /Preferred Special features; very long networks TT preferred Special features; Standby Power Supply TT preferred Special features; Load sensitive to high load currents (e.g. motors) TT preferred OR IT can be acceptable Special features; Low natural insulation (furnace) OR very large HF filters (computers). TN-S preferred. Special features; control and monitoring systems IT for continuity of service OR TT for enhanced equipotentiality 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 38 Common Fai l ur es No c l ear under s t and i n g of Ear t hi ng s ys t em I n c a mpu s t yp e env i r onment , T T s ys t e m b et we en s wi t c h boar d s a r e us e d ( on l y 4 c a bl e s and wi t hout PE ) howe ver pr oper e a r t hi ng at bot h e nds ar e not i ns t al l e d. Wr on g e ar t h i n g s ys t e m s e l e c t ed , e . g . mos t en g i ne er s ar e NOT f ami l i ar wi t h I T s ys t em ( un ea r t h ed neut r a l ) . Howe ve r I T s ys t em s h ou l d be u s e d i n c r i t i c a l s er vi c e s s uc h a s op er at i n g t h e at r e . Cur r e nt i ni t i at i ve s ar e be i n g und er t aken t o dr a f t s t an dar d s a nd pr omot e us e of I T s ys t e m f or c r i t i c al s er vi c e i n Mal ays i a . 3 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my The Prot ect i ve Ear t h 4 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 40 Ma ny E l ec t r i c a l E n g i ne er s ar e s t i l l c on f u s ed on s p ec i f y i n g t yp e of ea r t h i n g s ys t em an d t he as s oc i at ed pr ot ec t i ve ear t h c onduc t or s . Typi c al s pec i f i c at i ons : Wi r i ng t o c ompl y wi t h I EE wi r i ng r egul at i on s Typi c al des c r i pt i on i n pr i c e des c r i pt i on 1 . L i ght i n g wi r i ng us i ng 2x 1. 5 mm - 1 C + E 2 . Sub mai ns wi r i ng us i ng 4x 50mm - 1 C + E 4 What i s t hi s + E ? TT System Earth at both ends has 3P and N (4 cables) TNS System Earth at source only, has 3P, N & P.E. (5 cables) 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 41 Bef or e 2000 Ear t h c ont i nui t y c abl es ar e t ypi c al l y : Copper t ape Cabl e ar mour i ng Even c ont i nui t y of c abl e t r unk i ng / t r ays . Af t e r 2 0 0 0 T h i s i s NOT AC C E P TAB L E . C a b l i ng s y s t e m wi l l be de e me d n o t i n c omp l i a nc e wi t h MS , I E C a nd I E E wi r i n g c o d e s . 4 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my What i s al l owabl e as P. E. ? WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 42 Types of P.E. approved Conductors in multi core cables Insulated or bare conductors in a common enclosure with live conductors Fixed installed bare or insulated conductors Metallic cables sheath, cable screen, cable armour, wirebraid, concentric conductors, metallic conduit subject to compliance with 543.2.2. In China, Italy, UK etc cable trays and ladders can be used as P.E. Types of P.E. not approved [543.2.3] Water pipes Support wire others 4 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 43 4 Cross sectional areas of line conductors S (mm) Minimum cross sectional area of the corresponding protective conductor (mm) If the protective conductor is of the same material as the line conductor If the protective conductor is not of the same material as the line conductor S < 16 S K 1 /K 2 x S 16 < S < 35 16 a K 1 /K 2 x 16 S > 35 S/2 a K 1 /K 2 x S/2 Where K 1 is the value of k for the line conductor, selected from table A54.1 or from the tables of IEC50364-4-43 according to the resistance of the conductor and insulation. K 2 is the value of k for the conductor selected from tables A 54.2 to A54.6 as applicable a for a PEN conductor the reduction of the cross section area is permitted only in accordance with the rules for sizing of the neutral conductor (see IEC 60364-5-52). EARTHING ARRANGEMENT PART 5-54 WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 44 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my EARTHING ARRANGEMENT PART 5-54 Generally P.E. must be half size phase conductor. Circuit with phases <16mm must have P.E. SAME size as phase condutor. If cable armouring and cable trays/trunking (steel) are to be used as P.E., then: 1. Above 2 rules must be complied; and 2. Effective area of P.E. (different from copper) must be corrected with K1 and K2 factors which will require larger cross sectional area of P.E. for steel. 4 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN EARTH & P.E. 45 4 Spec i f y Sub Mai ns : 1 . Sub Mai ns wi r i ng us i ng 4x 50mm - 1C + 1x 25mm - 1 C 2 . Sub mai ns wi r i ng us i ng 5x 16mm - 1 C F i nal s ub c i r c ui t : 1 . L i g ht i ng wi r i ng 3 x 1 . 5 mm - 1 C 2 . F i n a l s u b c i r c u i t wi r i n g 5 x 1 0 mm - 1 C COMPLY WITH MS, IEC AND BS WIRING CODES 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Cor rect l y Si zi ng Mai n Cabl es 5 Image: http://www.leadercable.com.my/ 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 47 5 TYPICAL CABLING SIZING FOR COST OPTIMISATION Transformer Neutral Earth MSB Main Earth Bar Main Cables; 1200A = 7x300mm XLPE/PVC 1600A = 11x400mm XLPE/PVC 2000A = 14x400mm XLPE/PVC 2000A = 7x630mm XLPE/PVC 3000A = 14x630mm XLPE/PVC TT Earthing System FAIL Cable Size 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 48 5 COMPLIANCE WITH MS, IEC AND BS WIRING CODES. Current Carrying capacities Annex A a road map Cable in air, ambient temp < 30degC Cable in ground, ambient temp < 20degC Temp correction factor Table A52.14 & A52.15 Soil thermal resistivity < 2.5 K-m/W correction factor soil t-r Table A52.15 Groups of Cables types A to D in table 52.1 Table A52.2 to A52.7 Table A52.17 to A52.19 Group reduction factor Groups of Cables types E to F in table 52.1 Table A52.8 to A52.13 Table A52.20 to A52.21 Group reduction factor Groups in conduits, trays, ductings F = 1/ SQRT(n) 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my 5 5 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 51 5 BASED ON TABLE B52.10 (CURRENT RATING) AND TABLE B52.17 (GROUP REDUCTION FACTOR) Rating Cable Size No of cables per phase Rating of individual cables (trefoil) B52.10 Group reduction factor B52.17 Effective rating of cable system 1200A 7x300mm 2 561 Amps 0.88 987 Fail 1200A 11x300mm 3 561 Amps 0.82 1380A Pass 1200A 7x400mm 2 656 Amps 0.88 1154A Fail 1600A 11x400mm 3 656 Amps 0.82 1613A Pass 1600A 14x300mm 4 561 Amps 0.77 1727A Pass 2000A 14x500mm 4 749 Amps 0.77 2306A Pass 3000A 14x500mm 4 749 Amps 0.77 2306A Fail 3000A 14x630mm 4 905 Amps 0.77 2787A Fail 3000A 18x630mm 5 905 Amps 0.75 3393A Pass Method F5 (Trefoil) 5 WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 52 Rating Cable Size No of cables per phase Rating of individual cables (flat) B52.10 Group reduction factor B52.17 Effective rating of cable system 1200A 7x300mm 2 629 Amps 0.88 1107 Fail 1200A 11x300mm 3 629 Amps 0.82 1547 Pass 1200A 7x400mm 2 754 Amps 0.88 1327A Pass 1600A 11x400mm 3 754 Amps 0.82 1854A Pass 1600A 14x300mm 4 629 Amps 0.77 1937A Pass 2000A 14x500mm 4 868 Amps 0.77 2673A Pass 3000A 14x500mm 4 868 Amps 0.77 2637A Fail 3000A 14x630mm 4 1005 Amps 0.77 3095A Pass BASED ON TABLE B52.10 (CURRENT RATING) AND TABLE B52.17 (GROUP REDUCTION FACTOR) Method F4 (Flat) 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Af t er Ca bl e S i z i n g e ns u r e t hat t he s el ec t e d met hod of i ns t a l l at i on i s adher ed a s c ur r ent r at i ng depends on i ns t al l at i on met hod. WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 53 5 Rating Cable Size Cables /phase Individual cables (trefoil) B52.10 Group reduction B52.17 Effective rating of cable system 3000A 18x630mm 5 905 Amps 0.75 3393A Pass Rating Cable Size Cables /phase Individual cables (trefoil) B52.10 Group reduction B52.17 Effective rating of cable system 3000A 14x630mm 4 1005 Amps 0.77 3095A Pass 1 cable diameter distance Neutral Neutral 26 th May 2011 hplooi@unifi.my Common pr obl ems wi t h Mai ns Cabl e Si z i ng Cable not sized based on MS/IEC method. Usually group reduction factor NOT applied. After sizing cables, the cable rating is based on installation method (flat or trefoil). Installation method DO NOT follow recommended installation method at design. Cable heating occurs. Best Practice WIRING DESIGN MAINS CABLE SIZING 54 5 1. Never run cables >1200A more than 100m 2. Ensure installation method match designed method. 3. Using many cables per phase has diminishing returns. Use bus ducts for >1200A. 25 Common Problems for M&E Engineers Armada Hotel , Petaling Jaya 26 th May 2011 Ir. Looi Hip Peu | hplooi@unifi.my