0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
591 Ansichten1 Seite
Clinical practice and research using genomics now increasingly require the interpretation of tumors from single patients. While pipelines for identifying variants from DNA sequence reads are maturing, interpreting the consequences of these variants remains a difficult and time-consuming task. Compounding this difficulty, most available software and expertise for interpreting these variants focuses on populations in large research studies, rather than individual patients in the clinic.
We have developed the Melanoma Profiler web tool to facilitate interpretation of the biological, clinical and pharmacological consequences of tumor variants for individual patients. Melanoma Profiler provides a framework to understand the consequences tumor somatic mutations in several ways:
1)Categorize the mutations based on the biological functions and molecular pathways constituted by the proteins encoded by the modified genes.
2) Generate associations between gene expression and patient outcome.
3)Generate associations between molecular pathways affected by modified genes and drug targets.
4) Allow clinicians to visualize where their patient’s tumor sits in the context of a large curated database of other melanoma tumors.
Originaltitel
Melanoma Profiler Web Tool for Integrative Analysis of Melanoma
Clinical practice and research using genomics now increasingly require the interpretation of tumors from single patients. While pipelines for identifying variants from DNA sequence reads are maturing, interpreting the consequences of these variants remains a difficult and time-consuming task. Compounding this difficulty, most available software and expertise for interpreting these variants focuses on populations in large research studies, rather than individual patients in the clinic.
We have developed the Melanoma Profiler web tool to facilitate interpretation of the biological, clinical and pharmacological consequences of tumor variants for individual patients. Melanoma Profiler provides a framework to understand the consequences tumor somatic mutations in several ways:
1)Categorize the mutations based on the biological functions and molecular pathways constituted by the proteins encoded by the modified genes.
2) Generate associations between gene expression and patient outcome.
3)Generate associations between molecular pathways affected by modified genes and drug targets.
4) Allow clinicians to visualize where their patient’s tumor sits in the context of a large curated database of other melanoma tumors.
Clinical practice and research using genomics now increasingly require the interpretation of tumors from single patients. While pipelines for identifying variants from DNA sequence reads are maturing, interpreting the consequences of these variants remains a difficult and time-consuming task. Compounding this difficulty, most available software and expertise for interpreting these variants focuses on populations in large research studies, rather than individual patients in the clinic.
We have developed the Melanoma Profiler web tool to facilitate interpretation of the biological, clinical and pharmacological consequences of tumor variants for individual patients. Melanoma Profiler provides a framework to understand the consequences tumor somatic mutations in several ways:
1)Categorize the mutations based on the biological functions and molecular pathways constituted by the proteins encoded by the modified genes.
2) Generate associations between gene expression and patient outcome.
3)Generate associations between molecular pathways affected by modified genes and drug targets.
4) Allow clinicians to visualize where their patient’s tumor sits in the context of a large curated database of other melanoma tumors.
A list of the modied genes carrying a non-synonymous variant
in the tumor can be more deeply interrogated by clicking on
the gene name to view the detected mutations in a genome browser window, together with annotations from databases such as COSMIC. The gene list can be viewed in table format and sorted in terms of the number of molecular pathways they potentially constitute. Drugs that potentially target the protein products of mutated genes in the sample tumor are also presented, with links to DrugBank. Molecular pathway data allows large numbers of mutated genes to be viewed within the context of synergistic relationships. Melanoma Proler identies molecular pathways constituted by genes modied in the tumor, together with any statistically signicant pathway enrichment within the list of genes and targeting drugs. Melanoma Proler generates diagrams showing tumor variant genes in the context of molecular signaling pathways, using KEGG pathways included in the R graphite program. In the KEGG pathway named melanoma, 13 genes (highlighted in red) are modied in the sample tumor, in agreement with the known importance of the signaling events represented in this pathway to melanoma formation and progression. The mutations in the molecular pathway gene list may be viewed in waterfall plots and heat maps that show the individual tumor of the particular patient in relationship to other tumors in the MelanomaDB database. These plots are also annotated with information such as relationships between RNA expression and patient survival, which mutations have been identied as driver mutations in melanoma, DrugBank drug targets, genes that encode proteins which are targets of drugs that are in current melanoma clinical trials, and genes that are predicted to encode druggable proteins. The MelanomaDB study allowed us to look across more than 300 melanoma tumors at the distribution of the number of genes altered across tumors. Melanoma Proler begins by contextualizing the data from the tumor sample in comparison with these >300 patients with melanoma analyzed by exome sequencing. MelanomaDB Scatter Chart Variant Analysis Pathway Analysis Pathway Visualization Waterfall Plots and Heat Maps Introduction Clinical practice and research using genomics now increasingly require the interpretation of tumors from single patients. While pipelines for identifying variants from DNA sequence reads are maturing, interpreting the consequences of these variants remains a difcult and time-consuming task. Compounding this difculty, most available software and expertise for interpreting these variants focuses on populations in large research studies, rather than individual patients in the clinic. We have developed the Melanoma Proler web tool to facilitate interpretation of the biological, clinical and pharmacological consequences of tumor variants for individual patients. Melanoma Proler provides a framework to understand the consequences of tumor somatic mutations in several ways: 1) Categorize the mutations based on the biological functions and molecular pathways constituted by the proteins encoded by the modied genes. 2) Generate associations between gene expression and patient outcome. 3) Generate associations between molecular pathways affected by modied genes and drug targets. 4) Allow clinicians to visualize where their patients tumor sits in the context of a large curated database of other melanoma tumors. Methods Melanoma Proler is based on the MelanomaDB database, curated by researchers at the University of Auckland, New Zealand and their international colleagues [1]. MelanomaDB brings together exome sequence and clinical data from over 300 melanomas and gene set data such as DrugBank drug ID targets [2], known melanoma drugs, drugs in clinical trial, druggability indices from in silico calculations [3], and various literature links to melanoma and RNA expression in tumors associated with patient outcome [4]. Features of MelanomaDB most pertinent to N=1 analysis of melanomas from individual patients were translated into the Melanoma Proler web application. For more details on methods, see reference [1]. Melanoma Proler integrates with Illuminas BaseSpace computational platform, taking as its input the somatic variant analysis (VCF) le produced by exome sequencing analysis of a tumor-normal pair. Both MelanomaDB and Melanoma Proler use open source resources provided by the research community, including signaling pathway information contained within the R graphite package [5]. The database and web application are in turn freely available for researchers to use at: MelanomaDB: http://genesetdb.auckland.ac.nz/melanomadb Melanoma Proler: https://apps.biomatters.com/melanoma-proler Results A typical workow for interpreting the exome tumor data of an individual patient using Melanoma Proler to identify clinically important genetic modications is shown at the right. 13 of the 50 genes modied by non-synonymous mutations in the sample tumor are members of the melanoma molecular pathway found in the KEGG database. Comparison of the mutations in the sample tumor with the mutation proles of other tumors in MelanomaDB reveals signicant features of the sample tumor, most notably the occurrence of BRAF and NRAS mutations which, while collectively occurring in 90% of melanomas, tend to be mutually exclusive and rarely co-occur in the same tumor. Other frequently occurring driver mutations found in the sample tumor include TP53 and CDKN2A. When signicant numbers of genes within a single pathway carry mutations, there may be synergies or complementarity between mutations, which may in turn inform choice of pathwaytargeted drug therapies. In this case, despite the presence of a BRAF somatic variant (which may be veried as a V600E mutation by interrogating the VCF le, and in some cases by additional Sanger sequencing), resistance to the BRAF V600E targeting drug Vemurafenib may potentially be more likely due to the presence of somatic variants in genes encoding other proteins in this signaling pathway. After they have been identied using Melanoma Proler, the capacity for additional mutations in this pathway to contribute to Vemurafenib resistance, such as by constitutively activating a signaling molecule downstream of BRAF, can be carefully examined. For example, this tumor contains a mutation in the AKT gene, an integrating protein also playing a role in over 30 other molecular pathways. Activating AKT mutations have previously been identied, and high RNA expression of AKT is associated with poor patient prognosis [4]. AKT is predicted to be druggable [3], and there are entries in the DrugBank database for experimental compounds targeting AKT [2]. This highlights a new type of patient in which an experimental AKT inhibitor may usefully be explored. Conclusions Melanoma Proler provides a useful set of integrated tools to facilitate interpretation of exome sequence data for N=1 individual tumors. Being able to categorize and visualize the patterns of somatic mutations in a particular tumor in reference to 300 other melanomas provides a context to understand the complex mutational information in an individual tumor, including the co- occurrence of mutations in the same molecular pathway and information relating to drugs, druggability, and expression-survival relationships. To further extend its utility, future development of Melanoma Proler will aim to include predictions of the effects of specic somatic mutations in the tumor (e.g. loss of function, altered function, or activation of the encoded protein), and to add information about other types of genetic modications in tumors such as structural variations, methylation, non-coding RNA and expression data. Expanded datasets of tumors will be added to MelanomaDB as they become available, including the incorporation of whole genome data. Melanoma Proler Web Tool for Integrative Analysis of Melanoma Melissa Pentecost, Steven Stones-Havas, Christopher Duran, Brett Ammundsen Biomatters Limited, Auckland, New Zealand Alexander Trevarton, Cristin Print Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Contact: melissa@biomatters.com 1. Trevarton et al., Frontiers in Cancer Genetics (2013) 2. Knox et al., Nucleic Acids Research (2011) 3. Blake et al. The Cancer Journal (2011) 4. Bogunovic et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (2009) 5. Sales et al., BMC Bioinformatics (2012)