MIA Central Terminal

Program Definition Document

Executive Summary
April 21, 2014
Overview
Activity Summary
Gate and Hardstand Requirements
Terminal Concept
Terminal Space Layout
Architectural Concept Renderings
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 2
ACTIVITY SUMMARY


M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 3
Future Design Day Flight Activity Summary
Total operations (arrivals and departures) for a peak month-
average day
Sources: MIA Airside Operations Division, Baseline Schedule; Central Terminal PDD Forecasts, May 2013; MIA Carriers Input, July 2013.
Carrier Group 2012 (Baseline) 2020 2025 2030 2035
AMR Carriers
1/
665 841 899 959 1027
Other Domestic Carriers 82 119 130 144 158
oneworld
2/
43 55 61 67 73
Foreign Flag Carriers
3/
112 186 209 231 261
Nonscheduled 16 18 20 22 24
TOTAL 918 1,219 1,319 1,423 1,543
Notes:
1. AMR Carriers include American Eagle and US Airways.
2. Growth rates incorporates changes in oneworld Alliance members (e.g. Mexicana, TAM, airberlin) between 2009 and 2012.
3. Assumes air service by new international entrant carriers based on discussions with MDAD Marketing Division.
4. Average annual growth rates for carriers currently operating at MIA are:
i. AMR carriers and oneworld Partners: 3.0% to 2020 and 1.3% thereafter
ii. All other carriers: 5.5% between 2012 and 2020 as a result of new entrant activity
anticipated by MDADs Marketing Division; 2.0% from 2020 through 2035;
Air Carrier Historical and Projected Statistics
Sources: MIA Airside Operations Division, Baseline Schedule; SMP Forecasts (approved by FAA on July 21, 2011); Central Terminal PDD Forecasts, May 2013; MIA Carriers
Input, July 2013.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
A
i
r

C
a
r
r
i
e
r

A
n
n
u
a
l

A
i
r
c
r
a
f
t

O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

Fiscal Year
Historical Air Carrier Operations
New Actual Data since Forecast Approval
SMP Operations Baseline Forecast - Low - AAGR*: 1.3%
SMP Operations Baseline Forecast - High - AAGR*: 2.3%
MIA PDD - Airline Derived Forecast - AAGR 2.3%
2
0
1
0

A
c
t
u
a
l

2
0
1
1

A
c
t
u
a
l

2
0
1
2


A
c
t
u
a
l

Notes:
1. AAGR* stands for Average Annual Growth Rate.
2. FAA FY2012 Terminal Area Forecast is not presented as it does not provide operations forecast for passenger aircraft specifically.
3. MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document forecast was prepared in consultation with all airlines currently operating at MIA.
GATE AND HARDSTAND
REQUIREMENTS



M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 6
Gate Requirements - Year 2035
Gate Demand Summary
Gate requirements by airline groups (144 total)
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 7
Gate Gauge RJ-S RJ-L NB WB JB NLA Total
American Airlines (AA) and oneworld Partners (OW) 0 0 44 1 23 1 69
AA + OW Spare Gates 0 0 4 0 3 0 7
Total Contact Gate Requirements AA + OW + Spares 0 0 48 1 26 1 76

American Eagle E175 Contact Gate Requirements 0 17 0 0 0 0 17
American Eagle E145 Ground Loaded Gate Requirements 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Gate Requirements American Eagle 2 17 0 0 0 0 19
Other Airlines (OAL) 0 0 29 0 15 2 46
MDAD Controlled Gates / Spares 0 0 1 0 2 0 3
Total Contact Gate Requirements OAL + MDAD-Controlled
Gates 0 0 30 0 17 2 49
Source: MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document Forecast, Ricondo & Associates, Inc., August 2013.
Note: The gate requirements presented above assume a preferential use of the gates.
Gate Requirements - Year 2035
Hardstand Positions Demand Summary
Hardstand positions by airline groups
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 8
Gate Gauge RJ-S RJ-L NB WB JB NLA Total
American Airlines and oneworld Partners 0 0 8 0 10 0 18
American Eagle 3 6 0 0 0 0 9
Total Hardstand Requirements AMR Carriers and
oneworld 3 6 8 0 10 0 27
Other Airlines (OAL) 0 0 8 0 5 0 13
Source: MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document Forecast, Ricondo & Associates, Inc., August 2013.
TERMINAL CONCEPT
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 9
Central Terminal Airside Refinements
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 10
Source: Pier Configuration Terminal Concept, Ricondo & Associates Inc., with MDAD Input, October 2013.

TERMINAL SPACE LAYOUT
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 11
Terminal Space Plan Level One
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 12
Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Bag Handling System Configuration, URS Corp., October 2013; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo &
Associates, October 2013.
Terminal Space Plan Level Two
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 13
Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo & Associates, October 2013.
Terminal Space Plan Level Three
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 14
Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo & Associates, October 2013.
Terminal Space Plan Level Four (APM)
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 15
Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo & Associates, October 2013.
ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
RENDERINGS
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 16
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 17
M I A M I - D A D E A V I A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 18