0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
21 Ansichten2 Seiten
While flossing is widely recommended by dentists to reduce plaque and prevent tooth decay and gum disease, the evidence that it provides these benefits is inconclusive. A review by the Cochrane Collaboration found only 12 relevant trials on flossing, most of which were small and of poor quality. The studies provided only weak evidence of a small reduction in plaque from flossing but no evidence that it reduces the risk of tooth decay. Flossing may help reduce gum disease risk by around 30% but the quality of the evidence is low. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to determine flossing's true benefits and risks.
Originalbeschreibung:
Newspaper article made into exercise; emphasis on English vocabulary (word-formation)
While flossing is widely recommended by dentists to reduce plaque and prevent tooth decay and gum disease, the evidence that it provides these benefits is inconclusive. A review by the Cochrane Collaboration found only 12 relevant trials on flossing, most of which were small and of poor quality. The studies provided only weak evidence of a small reduction in plaque from flossing but no evidence that it reduces the risk of tooth decay. Flossing may help reduce gum disease risk by around 30% but the quality of the evidence is low. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to determine flossing's true benefits and risks.
While flossing is widely recommended by dentists to reduce plaque and prevent tooth decay and gum disease, the evidence that it provides these benefits is inconclusive. A review by the Cochrane Collaboration found only 12 relevant trials on flossing, most of which were small and of poor quality. The studies provided only weak evidence of a small reduction in plaque from flossing but no evidence that it reduces the risk of tooth decay. Flossing may help reduce gum disease risk by around 30% but the quality of the evidence is low. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to determine flossing's true benefits and risks.
tooth decay Can flossing reduce the ris! of tooth decay "hen you ta!e a close loo! at the evidence# it$s not %uite as &&&&&&&' ()*+,-./*0 as you 1ay thin!' Dentists say elite athletes could stand a 2etter chance of 3inning gold 1edals if they loo! after their teeth' 4/o3 often do you floss your teeth5 -t$s a %uestion al1ost al3ays as!ed 2y dentists 3hen you are in the chair' "e$re advised that 3e should floss our teeth as 3ell as 2rushing &&&&&'' (*"60 a day' But are 3e really clear on the e7act 2enefit this 1ight 2ring *he idea is that flossing &&&&&'' (86"0 your ris! of tooth decay and gu1 disease 2y preventing the 2uild-up of pla%ue' 9la%ue is the &&&&&&' ()*-C:0 fil1 of 2acteria fuelled 2y the car2ohydrates 3e eat' -f left to 2reed# these 2acteria eventually 2egin to 2rea! do3n the tooth$s surface# leading to painful &&&&&& (C,;<0 that need filling# or even to the &&&&&& (+<M6;<0 of the tooth if the decay is too 3idespread' 9la%ue 2egins to refor1 the 1inute you re1ove it# and if not re1oved it can lead to gingivitis# 3here gu1s 2eco1e infla1ed and &&&&&& (B866D0 easily' -n a 2=- year longitudinal study of 1en in >or3ay# teeth surrounded 2y infla1ed gu1s 3ere 4= ti1es 1ore li!ely to 2e lost 2y the end of the study than teeth surrounded 2y healthy gu1s' "e !no3 a tooth2rush cannot address the pla%ue pro2le1 co1pletely# as it$s so hard to reach areas 2et3een the teeth' *he idea of using flossing to reach the rest is credited to a dentist fro1 >e3 6rleans called 8evi )pear 9ar1ly# 3ho reco11ended using sil! for the purpose 2ac! in 1?1@' But it$s not only hu1ans 3ho do it' 8ong-tailed 1aca%ues at the Buddhist shrine of 9rang )a1 Aot in *hailand ta!e strands of long hu1an hair and 3ind the1 round their fingers to get to those hard to reach parts of their 1ouths' *here$s plenty of evidence to suggest that flossing reduces pla%ue levels# 2ut 3hat evidence is there that flossing can reduce the ris! of 2oth tooth decay and gingivitis "hen you ta!e a close loo! at the research# it$s not %uite as straightfor3ard as you 1ay thin!' , revie3 of flossing in children found it could reduce decay# 2ut in adults it$s not 2een as easy to de1onstrate' , revie3 pu2lished 2y the respected Cochrane Colla2oration in 2012 gathered all the e7isting research on flossing and found Bust 12 trials# 1ostly conducted in the C)# 3here adults 3ere rando1ised either to 2rush their teeth as usual or to floss in &&&&'' (,DD0' *hey 3eren$t i1pressed 3ith 3hat they found' Co12ining the results of the studies and re-analysing the1# they found a possi2le s1all &&&&&'' (+<DCC<0 in pla%ue# 2ut the studies$ evidence 3as graded as 3ea! and very unrelia2le' 4"e are una2le to clai1 or refute a 2enefit for flossing plus tooth2rushing#5 they said' , reduction in pla%ue 3ould suggest a reduction in tooth decay in the long-ter1# 2ut not a single long-ter1 rando1ised controlled trial had 2een done (the longest 3as nine 1onths0' >one had included an &&&&&'' (,))<))0 of tooth decay 2ecause it 3ould 2e too soon to see any difference' .ap in the literature *he &&&&&& (F->D0 for gingivitis tell us 1ore' Flossing does help reduce the ris!# if only 2y ?D' *his 3as at least so1e positive ne3s for flossing fans# in contrast to an earlier revie3 fro1 200? 3hich found it couldn$t de1onstrate any 2enefits for regular flossing' But the %uality of the evidence 1a!es it hard to co1e to any strong &&&&&&' (C6>C8CD<0' Cochrane +evie3s not only su11arise all the data availa2le# 2ut they rate the research according to ho3 3ell it 3as designed and conducted' *hey Budged that 1any studies didn$t co1e up to scratch# ran!ing the %uality as 4lo35' ,s poor as the evidence 1ight 2e dee1ed to 2e# it$s still all 3e have to go on at the 1o1ent' )o you could argue that if it 1ay 2e useful for us# 3hat$s the har1 in getting everyone to floss any3ay )elf-inflicted da1age could 2e the reason# and so1e studies have investigated this' 6ne found that three of the EF people ta!ing part had da1aged their gu1s one 1onth into the study# 2ut 2y t3o 1onths# t3o of these people no longer had pro2le1s' ,nother found t3o people had da1aged their gu1s 2y using a type of auto1atic flosser# 2ut not in %uite the right 3ay' -f you 3ant to !no3 the right 3ay to floss# here$s a guide' ,nd in the a2sence of any forthco1ing evidence that could &&&&&'' ()*+6>.0 the case either 3ay# if you are going to floss at least 1a!e sure it doesn$t do you 1ore har1 than good'