Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

4-Volume Set

Richard Rorty
CRITICAL ASSESSMENTS OF LEADING PHILOSOPHERS
Edited by James Tartaglia, University of Keele, UK
Richard Rorty (1931–2007) remains one of the contemporary world’s most influential
thinkers. He has been a major figure in philosophy ever since the publication of his first
important paper, ‘Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories’ in 1965, but it was the
release of his seminal Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979) that caused the literature
on his work to expand exponentially, a process which has accelerated since his death in
2007; scores of new articles and books about Rorty appear every year, and even his
biography has proved to be an academic bestseller. Rorty’s enduring appeal has a number
of sources. One is the scope and urgency of his views, for he was never shy about
presenting his call for the abandonment of objective truth against the grand backdrop of
the cultural progress of the West. Another is that his views were highly controversial, and
yet could not be easily dismissed, since Rorty was able to claim with some plausibility that
he was simply drawing out the consequences of positions developed by his more
conventionally respectable peers. And another is that Rorty applied his views to a wide
range of topical concerns outside of academic philosophy. For these and many other
reasons, philosophers to this day line up to refute him, students read Rorty before the
philosophers he discusses, and non-philosophy academics produce a continuous stream of
articles applying his views to their own interests.
The daunting quantity (and variable quality) of literature available on Rorty makes it
difficult to discriminate the useful from the tendentious, superficial, and otiose. That is
why this new title in the highly regarded Routledge series, Critical Assessments of Leading
Philosophers, is so urgently needed. Edited by James Tartaglia, the author of Rorty and the
Mirror of Nature (Routledge, 2007), one of the most popular and straightforward books
available on Rorty, this new Routledge Major Work is a four-volume collection of the best
scholarship from the 1960s to the present day; the collected materials have been carefully
selected from a wide range of academic journals, edited collections, and research
monographs, many of which are hard to obtain in their original source.
The first of the four volumes (‘Mind, Language, and Truth’) covers Rorty’s eliminative
materialism in the philosophy of mind, his Davidsonian rejection of conceptual schemes
in the philosophy of language, and his rejection of objective truth. Volume II
(‘Metaphilosophy and Pragmatism’), meanwhile, assembles the best assessments of his
pessimistic metaphilosophy, and his distinctive conception of pragmatism. The third
volume (‘Philosophers’) brings together the key scholarly work on Rorty’s highly original—
but endlessly disputed—interpretations of other philosophers, while the final volume in
the collection (Volume IV: ‘Themes’) explores Rorty’s views as applied to a diverse range
of topics, from feminism to environmentalism and bioethics.
The tightly focused organization of this collection will allow scholars quickly and
easily to access both established and up-to-date assessments of Rorty’s central
positions, and will also make for irresistible browsing. With comprehensive
introductions to each volume, providing essential background information and
relating the various articles to each other, Richard Rorty is destined to be an
indispensable resource for research and study.
Routledge
November 2009
234x156: 1,600pp
Set Hb: 978-0-415-49004-7

Routledge Major Works


Richard Rorty CRITICAL ASSESSMENTS OF LEADING PHILOS
VOLUME I VOLUME II
Mind, Language, and Truth Metaphilosophy and Pragmatism

Reviews of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature


Richard Rorty
22. Quentin Skinner, ‘The End of Philosophy?’, New York Review of Books, 19
1. Obituary, The Times, 12 June 2007. March 1981, 46–8.
2. Stephen Metcalf, ‘Richard Rorty: What Made Him a Crucial American 23. Harry Ruja, ‘Review of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature’, Philosophy and
Philosopher?’, Washington Post, 18 June 2007. Phenomenological Research, 1981, 42, 299–300.
3. Neil Gross, ‘Rorty Reexamined’, Richard Rorty: The Making of an American 24. Chris Murphy, ‘Critical Notice of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature’,
Philosopher (University of Chicago Press, 2008), pp. 301–32. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1981, 59, 338–45.
4. Ermanno Bencivenga, ‘Rorty and I’, The Philosophical Forum, 1993, 24, 25. Fred Dretske, ‘Review of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature’, International
307-18. Studies in Philosophy, 1982, 14, 96–8.
Mind 26. Richard J. Bernstein, ‘Philosophy in the Conversation of Mankind’, Review
5. James W. Cornman, ‘On the Elimination of “Sensations” and Sensations’, of Metaphysics, 1979, 33, 745–75.
Review of Metaphysics, 1968, 22, 15–35. 27. Ian Hacking, ‘Is the End in Sight for Epistemology?’, Journal of Philosophy,
6. William G. Lycan and George S. Pappas, ‘What is Eliminative Materialism?’, 1980, 77, 579–88.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1972, 50, 149–59. 28. Jaegwon Kim, ‘Rorty on the Possibility of Philosophy’, Journal of Philosophy,
7. Eric Bush, ‘Rorty Revisited’, Philosophical Studies, 1974, 25, 33–42. 1980, 77, 588–97.

8. Philip Cam, ‘“Rorty Revisited”, or “Rorty Revised?”’, Philosophical Studies, Metaphilosophy


1978, 33, 377–86. 29. Alasdair MacIntyre, ‘Philosophy, the “Other” Disciplines, and their
9. David R. Hiley, ‘Is Eliminative Materialism Materialistic?’, Philosophy and Histories: A Rejoinder to Richard Rorty’, Soundings, 1982, 65, 127–45.
Phenomenological Research, 1978, 38, 325–37. 30. David R. Hiley, ‘Edification and the End of Philosophy’, Philosophy in
10. Kenneth T. Gallagher, ‘Rorty’s Antipodeans: An Impossible Illustration?’, Question: Essays on a Pyrrhonian Theme (University of Chicago Press, 1988),
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1985, 45, 449–55. pp. 143–73, 190–3.

11. John Furlong, ‘Scientific Psychology as Hermeneutics? Rorty’s Philosophy 31. Michael Williams, ‘Epistemology and the Mirror of Nature’, in Robert B.
of Mind’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1988, 48, 489–503. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics (Blackwell, 2000), pp. 191–213.

12. Attila Karakus and Andreas Vieth, ‘Is Rorty’s Non-Reductive Naturalism 32. Michael Williams, ‘Rorty on Knowledge and Truth’, in Charles Guignon
Reductive?’, in Andreas Vieth (ed.), Richard Rorty: His Philosophy Under and David R. Hiley (eds.), Richard Rorty (Cambridge University Press,
Discussion (Ontos Verlag, 2005), pp. 79–96. 2003), pp. 61–80.

Language 33. Ernest Sosa, ‘Serious Philosophy and Freedom of Spirit’, Journal of
Philosophy, 1987, 84, 707–26.
13. Michael Losonsky, ‘Reference and Rorty’s Veil’, Philosophical Studies, 1985,
47, 291–4. 34. Konstantin Kolenda, ‘Can Free Spirits be Serious?’, Southwest Philosophy
Review, 1989, 5, 107–12.
14. Michael Devitt, ‘Rorty’s Mirrorless World’, Realism and Truth, 2nd edn.
(Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 203–19. 35. D. Z. Phillips, ‘Reclaiming the Conversations of Mankind’, Philosophy, 1994,
69, 35–53.
15. David Houghton, ‘Rorty’s Talk-About’, in A. Malachowski (ed.), Reading
Rorty: Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (and 36. Jakob Hohwy, ‘Quietism and Cognitive Command’, Philosophical Quarterly,
Beyond) (Blackwell, 1990), pp. 156–70. 1997, 47, 495–500.

16. Robert B. Brandom, ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism 37. Gary B. Madison, ‘Philosophy Without Foundations’, Reason Papers, 1991,
and Historicism’, in Robert B. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and his Critics 16, 15–44.
(Blackwell, 2000), pp. 156–83. 38. Manuel Arriaga, ‘Richard Rorty’s Anti-Foundationalism and Traditional
Truth Philosophy’s Claim of Social Relevance’, International Philosophical
Quarterly, 2005, 45, 467–82.
17. Simon Blackburn, ‘Observation and Truth: From Locke to Rorty’, Truth: A
Guide for the Perplexed (Allen Lane, 2005), pp. 139–71, 229–31. Pragmatism

18. Mark Okrent, ‘The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth’, 39. Cornel West, ‘The Decline and Resurgence of American Pragmatism: W. V.
Inquiry, 1993, 36, 381–404. Quine and Richard Rorty’, The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy
of Pragmatism (University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), pp. 182–210, 265–9.
19. Paul Boghossian, ‘Epistemic Relativism Defended’ and ‘Epistemic
Relativism Rejected’, Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism 40. Robert Kirk, ‘Rorty’s “Postmodern” Pragmatism’, Relativism and Reality: A
(Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 58–94. Contemporary Introduction (Routledge, 1999), pp. 134–43.

20. D. Vaden House, ‘Without God or His Doubles?’, Without God or His 41. H. O. Mounce, ‘Rorty: Hermeneutics and Irony’, The Two Pragmatisms: From
Doubles: Realism, Relativism and Rorty (E. J. Brill, 1994), pp. 116–45. Peirce to Rorty (Routledge, 1997), pp. 193–209.

21. Bernard Williams, ‘Accuracy: A Sense of Reality’, Truth and Truthfulness: An 42. David Hall, ‘An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking’, Richard Rorty:
Essay in Genealogy (Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 123–48, 294–6. Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism (SUNY Press, 1994), pp. 65–101,
253–9.
43. Ronald Dworkin, ‘Pragmatism, Right Answers, and True Banality’, in
Michael Brint and William Weaver (eds.), Pragmatism in Law and Society
(Westview Press, 1991), pp. 359–69, 382–3.
44. Susan Haack, ‘Vulgar Pragmatism: An Unedifying Prospect’, Evidence and
Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology, 2nd edn. (Prometheus
Books, 2009), pp. 239–53, 295–6.

Routledge Major Works Intended Contents


OPHERS
Wittgenstein
VOLUME III 65. Greg Hill, ‘Solidarity, Objectivity, and the Human Form of Life:
Wittgenstein vs. Rorty’, Critical Review, 1997, 11, 555–80.
Philosophers 66. Michael Peters, ‘Rorty, Wittgenstein, and Postmodernism: Neopragmatism
and the Politics of the Ethnos’, in Michael Peters and James Marshall,
Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Postmodernism, Pedagogy (Bergin and Garvey, 1999),
Davidson pp. 133–51.
45. John P. Murphy, ‘Post-Quinean Pragmatism’, Pragmatism: From Peirce to
Davidson (Westview Press, 1990), pp. 95–116, 123–5, 132.
46. Maria Baghramian, ‘Rorty, Davidson and Truth’, Ratio, 1990, 3, 101–16. VOLUME IV
47. Frank B. Farrell, Subjectivity, Realism and Postmodernism: The Recovery of the
World (Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 117–47. Themes
48. Bjørn Ramberg, ‘Post-Ontological Philosophy of Mind: Rorty versus
Davidson’, in Robert B. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics (Blackwell, Bioethics
2000), pp. 351–70.
67. John D. Arras, ‘Rorty’s Pragmatism and Bioethics’, Journal of Medicine and
Dennett Philosophy, 2003, 28, 597–613.
49. Daniel C. Dennett, ‘Comments on Rorty’, Synthese, 1982, 53, 349–56. Chinese Philosophy
50. Daniel C. Dennett, ‘Postmodernism and Truth’, in Daniel Dahlstrom (ed.), 68. Kwang-Sae Lee, ‘Rorty and Chuang Tzu: Anti-Representationalism,
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (Vol. 8: Pluralism and Conversation (or Resonance of Pipings)’, Journal of Chinese
Contemporary Philosophy) (Philosophy Doc. Ctr., 2000), pp. 93–103. Philosophy, 1996, 23, 175–92.
Derrida Environmental Philosophy
51. Simon Critchley, ‘Deconstruction and Pragmatism: Is Derrida a Private 69. Andrew Light, ‘Materialists, Ontologists, and Environmental Pragmatists’,
Ironist or a Public Liberal?’, in Chantal Mouffe (ed.), Deconstruction and Social Theory and Practice, 1995, 21, 315–33.
Pragmatism (Routledge, 1996), pp. 19–40.
70. Simon Hailwood, ‘Landscape, Nature, and Neopragmatism’, Environmental
52. Paul Trembath, ‘The Rhetoric of Philosophical “Writing”: Emphatic Ethics, 2007, 29, 131–49.
Metaphors in Derrida and Rorty’, The Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism,
1989, 47, 169–73. Ethnocentrism

Dewey 71. Matthew Festenstein, ‘Ethnocentrism and Irony’, Pragmatism and Political
Theory: From Dewey to Rorty (Polity Press, 1997), pp. 109–44, 216–24.
53. James Gouinlock, ‘What is the Legacy of Instrumentalism? Rorty’s
Interpretation of Dewey’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1990, 28, Feminism
251–69. 72. Sabina Lovibond, ‘Feminism and Pragmatism: A Reply to Richard Rorty’,
54. Richard Shusterman, ‘Pragmatism and Liberalism Between Dewey and New Left Review, 1992, 193, 56–74.
Rorty’, Political Theory, 1994, 22, 391–412. Irony
Gadamer 73. Phillips E. Young, ‘The Irony of Ironic Liberalism’, International Studies in
55. Georgia Warnke, ‘Hermeneutics and the “New Pragmatism”’, Gadamer: Philosophy, 1997, 29, 121–30.
Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Polity Press, 1987), pp. 139–66, 194–7. 74. John Horton, ‘Irony and Commitment: An Irreconcilable Dualism of
Habermas Modernity’, in Matthew Festenstein and Simon Thompson (eds.), Richard
Rorty: Critical Dialogues (Polity Press, 2001), pp. 15–28.
56. Jürgen Habermas, ‘Coping with Contingencies: The Return of Historicism’,
in Jósef Niznik and John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy Literature
(Praeger, 1996), pp. 1–24, 29–30. 75. Jon Stewart, ‘The Philosophical Curriculum and Literature Culture: A
Hegel Response to Rorty’, Man and World, 1994, 27, 195–209.

57. Jonathan Salem-Wiseman, ‘Absolute Knowing and Liberal Irony: Hegel, 76. Barbara McGuinness, ‘Rorty, Literary Narrative and Political Philosophy’,
Rorty, and the Criterion of Progress’, International Studies in Philosophy, History of the Human Sciences, 1997, 10, 29–44.
1999, 31, 139–53. Moral Philosophy
Heidegger 77. J. B. Schneewind, ‘What has Moral Philosophy Done for Us … Lately?’
58. Charles B. Guignon, ‘On Saving Heidegger from Rorty’, Philosophy and (2009) (new for this collection).
Phenomenological Research, 1986, 46, 401–17. 78. Christian B. Miller, ‘Rorty and Moral Relativism’, European Journal of
Nietzsche Philosophy, 2002, 10, 354–74.

59. Daniel W. Conway, ‘Disembodied Perspectives: Nietzsche contra Rorty’, Nihilism


Nietzsche-Studien, 1992, 21, 281–9. 79. Karen L. Carr, ‘Richard Rorty and the Dissolution of Crisis’, The Banalization
Peirce of Nihilism: Twentieth-Century Responses to Meaninglessness (SUNY Press,
1992), pp. 85–116, 164–71.
60. Susan Haack, ‘“We Pragmatists …”: Peirce and Rorty in Conversation’,
Partisan Review, 1997, 64, 91–107. 80. M. A. Casey, ‘Rorty: The Post-Metaphysical Solution to Meaninglessness’,
Meaninglessness: The Solutions of Nietzsche, Freud, and Rorty (Lexington
Plato Books, 2002), pp. 77–113.
61. William M. Goodman, ‘Theaetetus, Part II: A Dialogical Review’, Antioch Politics
Review, 1984, 42, 393–408.
81. Alan Johnson, ‘The Politics of Richard Rorty’, New Politics, 2000, 29,
Putnam 103–21.
62. Hilary Putnam, ‘Realism with a Human Face, Part Two: Relativism’, Realism 82. Norman Geras, ‘Language, Truth and Justice’, Solidarity in the Conversation of
with a Human Face (Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 18–29, 323–4. Humankind: The Ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty (Verso, 1995),
63. Hilary Putnam, ‘Truth, Activation Vectors and Possession Conditions for pp. 107–47.
Concepts’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1992, 52, 431–8. Religion
64. Paul D. Forster, ‘What is at Stake Between Rorty and Putnam?’, Philosophy 83. Nicolas H. Smith, ‘Rorty on Religion and Hope’, Inquiry, 2005, 48, 76–98.
and Phenomenological Research, 1992, 52, 585–603.
84. James Flaherty, ‘Rorty, Religious Beliefs, and Pragmatism’, International
Philosophical Quarterly, 2005, 45, 175–85.
Social Science
85. Ben Letson, ‘Richard Rorty and The Meaning of Social Science’, International
Social Science Review, 1995, 70, 43–52.

MJWK0937

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen