H. T.

Liu
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering and Center for Computer-Aided
Design,
The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
and
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1593
L. Z. Sun
1
e-mail: lizhi-sun@uiowa.edu
H. C. Wu
Fellow ASME
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering,
The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
Monte Carlo Simulation of
Particle-Cracking Damage
Evolution in Metal Matrix
Composites
In the modeling of microstructural damage mechanisms of composites, damage evolution
plays an important role and has signicant effects on the overall nonlinear behavior of
composites. In this study, a microstructural Monte Carlo simulation method is proposed
to predict the volume fraction evolution of damaged particles due to particle-cracking for
metal matrix composites with randomly distributed spheroidal particles. The perfor-
mance function is constructed using a stress-based damage criterion. A micromechanics-
based elastoplastic and damage model is applied to compute the local stress eld and to
estimate the overall nonlinear response of the composites with particle-cracking damage
mechanism. The factors that affect the damage evolution are investigated and the effects
of particle shape and damage strength on damage evolution are discussed in detail.
Simulation results are compared with experiments and good agreement is
obtained. DOI: 10.1115/1.1925291
1 Introduction
Research and industry have become more and more interested
in composite materials due to their high performance standards
and light weight. Particle-reinforced metal matrix composites
PRMMCs are an important candidate in composite materials
system because of their high strength, high modulus, high melting
point, low coefcient of thermal expansion, good resistance to
moisture, good dimensional stability, and ease of production and
processing 1. Although the addition of hard particles into the
ductile matrix enhances mechanical properties, it produces new
microstructural damage mechanisms 2,3 such as particle-matrix
interfacial debonding and particle cracking, which restrict the po-
tential for widespread use. Minimizing these limitations through
microstructural design requires a thorough understanding of the
micromechanisms of their intrinsic damage processes. Many stud-
ies have been conducted in this eld due to its importance. Llorca
et al. combined an experimental and numerical investigation on
the particulate fracture of a spray formed SiCp/ Al2618 PRMMCs
4. Zhao and Weng, Sun et al., and Liu et al. adopted an
equivalent-particle stiffness method through the damage modeling
of composites 510.
In the modeling of PRMMCs with damage, microstructural
damage evolution plays a key role in the prediction of the overall
behavior of PRMMCs. Derrien et al. studied the tensile behavior
and damage of SiCp/ Al PRMMCs experimentally SiC particle-
reinforced Al matrix, with a 15% particle volume fraction 11.
Results showed that larger particles or particles with a big aspect
ratio were the rst to fail. Brechet et al. investigated the mecha-
nisms of deformation and failure in SiCp/ Al2618 PRMMCs pro-
cessed by spray forming 12. The relations between the propor-
tions of damage particles and the strain, particle size and the
particles aspect ratio were collected. The fractions of damaged
particles at various strain levels were obtained. Caceres and Grif-
ths studied the cracking of Si particles as a function of the ap-
plied strain in the Al7%Si casting composites during plastic de-
formation for different microstructures 13. They observed a
similar trend: the larger and longer particles those with a larger
aspect ratio are prone to crack. Li et al. combined computational
and experimental tools to obtain a quantitative 3D characterization
of phase and damage morphology 14.
The objective of this paper is to perform a microstructural
Monte Carlo simulation for predicting the volume fraction evolu-
tion of damaged particles due to particle-cracking for metal matrix
composites with randomly distributed spheroidal particles. The
performance function is constructed using a stress-based damage
criterion. A micromechanics-based elastoplastic and damage
model is applied to compute the local stress eld and to estimate
the overall elastoplastic response of the composites with particle-
cracking damage mechanism. The factors that affect the damage
evolution are investigated and the effects of particle shape and
damage strength on damage evolution are discussed in detail.
Simulation results are compared with experiments and good
agreement is obtained.
2 Weibull Statistical Function
Weibull statistical function 15 is a common probability func-
tion used either to characterize the damage evolution in the mod-
eling of PRMMCs 510, or to t experimental data 12,16. For
example, Wilkinson et al. 17 adopted Weibull probability func-
tion to represent the extent of damage in their modeling of particle
clustering and damage. Gonzalez and Llorca 18 used nite ele-
ment simulations to compute the fraction of broken reinforce-
ments which is assumed following Weibull statistics in their self-
consistent modeling of two-phase materials including damage.
Segurado et al. 19 conducted a nite element analysis on the
mechanical properties of composites. In their simulations, Weibull
statistics is adopted to represent the fracture probability of brittle
particles. In Eckschlager et al.s unit cell model 20 for brittle
fracture of particles embedded in a ductile matrix, Weibull-type
fracture probability was used to describe the damage probability.
Specically, if a stress-controlled damage process is assumed,
the general form of the cumulative probability distribution func-
tion of a two-parameter Weibull distribution can be expressed as
1
Corresponding Author. Tel.: 319-384-0830; Fax: 319-335-5660.
Contributed by the Materials Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEER-
ING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 28, 2004. Final
manuscript received March 10, 2005. Review conducted by Mohammed Cherkaoui.
318 / Vol. 127, JULY 2005 Copyright 2005 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
P = 1 exp

1
where m and s are the two shape-parameters, and is the stress
parameter that controls the damage process. For example, in a
normal stress controlled cracking process, could be chosen as
the normal stress in the loading direction inside the particle. In
contrast, in particle-matrix interfacial debonding, could refer to
the interfacial normal stress when only Mode-I fracture debonding
is considered. It should be noted that if the average critical dam-
age strength
cri
is given, the Weibull parameters m and s are no
longer independent. A relationship between these parameters and
the critical strength is established from statistical theory as 5

cri
= s 1 +
1
m
2
Here, is the Euler gamma function. For a given m, the corre-
sponding s can be calculated using Eq. 2. For example, when
m=1, s=
cri
; and when m=5, s=1.09
cri
.
The Weibull probability function provides a simplied, phe-
nomenological way to simulate the damage evolution. However,
determining these shape parameters is a big challenge because of
the diversity and uncertainty of material microstructures, congu-
rations, producing processes, and so on. Brechet et al. conducted
experiments of SiCp/ Al356 composites, in which particle crack-
ing dominates the microstructural damage 12. Their experimen-
tal results showed that the Weibull parameter m was in the range
of 16. The experiment of Si particle-reinforced Al matrix com-
posites conducted by Caceres and Grifths showed that the
Weibull parameter m was estimated to be in the range of 2.33.3
13. Lewis and Withers showed that the Weibull parameter m
=4.5 leads to good agreement with their experimental observation
of ZrO
2
/ Al PRMMCs 21. Llorca et al. obtained the best t when
m=1 for their experimental results of SiCp/ Al2618 PRMMCs 4,
while m=4 was obtained in Derriens experiments of
SiCp/ Al2028 PRMMCs 11. In analytical modeling, a preas-
signed value of m was usually taken without enough experiment
support. For example, Sun et al. took m=5 in a particle-cracking
modeling for PRMMCs 8.
The experimental results show that Weibull parameters are usu-
ally material and microstructure dependent, implying that differ-
ent sets of Weibull parameters should be taken for different ma-
terials and microstructures. In other words, for a specic
PRMMC, experimental investigations into damage evolution are
needed for all possible microstructures. At the same time, experi-
ments on composite damage are difcult to conduct, and due to
intrinsic uncertainty, a considerable number of experiments are
usually a necessity. Thus, few data are available for many com-
posites.
3 Monte Carlo Simulation
Microstructural damage evolution is a probabilistic process be-
cause: rst, if we assume that particles are randomly distributed in
the matrix, then they have identical local stress elds. In a deter-
ministic approach once one particle is damaged due to its local
stress intensity, all particles will be damaged, since they have
identical local stress elds. Second, the microstructures of com-
posites, such as the aspect ratio of particles and critical damage
strength e.g., interfacial bonding strength or particle cracking
strength usually have large divergence due to the uncertainty in-
troduced by fabrication processes. Therefore, a probability ap-
proach should be used to predict the damage evolution of com-
posites. Although there are several analytical methods available,
such as the rst-order reliability method FORM or the second-
order reliability method SORM, Monte Carlo simulation is
adopted in this study because of the intrinsic nonlinear behavior of
this problem.
According to fracture mechanics theory, there are a variety of
failure criteria depending on the material, microstructure, congu-
ration and loading conditions, such as the stress-controlled failure
criterion 22, strain-controlled criterion 23,24, and energy-
controlled criterion. To illustrate the methodology of Monte Carlo
simulation, we assume that particle cracking may take place inside
the particles once the local stress intensity reaches critical value
22. It is straightforward to incorporate other criteria into our
model.
For a composite system, spheroidal particles are randomly dis-
tributed in the matrix Fig. 1a. According to Eshelbys micro-
mechanics theory, and without considering direct interactions
among particles, stresses inside particles are expressed as a func-
tion of the external loads
0
or the corresponding external strain

0
=C
0

1
:
0
as 2527
= C
0
I + I S S + C
1
C
0

1
C
0

1
:
0
3
Or, in a general form as
= C
0
, C
1
,
0
, 4
where C
0
and C
1
are the elastic stiffness tensors of the matrix
and the particles, respectively, I represents the fourth-rank identity
tensor, is the aspect ratio of the spheroidal particles see Fig. 2,
and S refers to the Eshelby tensor that can be expressed explicitly
for spheroidal particles 28. It is also noted that the double-dot
symbol : denotes the tensor contraction between a fourth-rank
and second-rank tensor, while the symbol represents the tensor
multiplication between two fourth-rank tensors.
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of microstructures of PRMMCs. a
Initial state undamaged; b particle cracking.
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology JULY 2005, Vol. 127 / 319
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
If the Mode-I fracture is considered, the normal component of
the local particle stress in the loading direction
11
controls the
initiation of particle cracking. Therefore, the cracking criterion
can be expressed as

11

cri
5
Here,
cri
is the critical damage strength for particle-cracking.
When the normal component of particle stresses goes beyond
critical strength, particle cracking occurs. Thus, a performance
function can be constructed as
g =
cri

11
C
0
, C
1
,
0
, 6
To perform a Monte Carlo simulation, some or all of the input
variables in the performance function Eq. 6 need to be ran-
domized, and a set of random values are generated for each Monte
Carlo simulation. By considering the damage criterion, a g value
greater than 0 means that the local normal stress is less than the
critical damage strength, and no cracking occurs. A g value less
than 0 indicates that the local normal stress inside the particle
goes beyond the critical damage strength. Thus, particle cracking
is initiated. By repeatedly running Monte Carlo simulation under a
loading stage with computer-generated random values for Eq. 6,
the damage probability for a particle under that loading step can
be expressed as
P =
t
d
t
t
7
where t
d
and t
t
represent the times of g0 when the damage
happens and the total running times of a Monte Carlo simulation,
respectively. To model the overall response of composites with
damage, the volume fraction of damaged particles
2
is com-
monly used to indicate how many particles are damaged, which
can be expressed as

2
= P 8
and the corresponding volume fraction for undamaged particles is

1
= 1 P 9
Here, represents the total volume fraction of particles of the
composite considered, and the relationship
1
+
2
= always
holds.
The proposed Monte Carlo simulation method can be used for
damage modeling of composites to characterize the damage evo-
lution. A recently proposed particle-cracking model 9 is modi-
ed here to predict the overall elastoplastic behavior of compos-
ites and damage evolution under external loading. The
incorporation of Monte Carlo simulation into other damage mod-
els, such as particle-matrix interfacial debonding, is straightfor-
ward.
4 Micromechanical Damage Model for Particle Crack-
ing
Let us consider a composite of an isotropically elastic matrix
phase 0 and unidirectionally aligned yet randomly distributed
elastic spheroidal particles phase 1 with distinct material prop-
erties Fig. 1a. It is assumed that the two phases are perfectly
bonded at the interface. To model particle cracking, penny-shaped
cracks phase 2 are used in the perfect particles to simulate actual
particle cracking damage, as shown in Fig. 1b. From the double-
inclusion theory, the local perturbed stress x due to a dam-
aged particle centered at x can be estimated as 29,30
xx = C
0
G
1
x x:
*
1
+ C
0
G
2
x x:
*
2

*
1
10
where G
1
xx is the exterior-point Eshelbys tensors for sphe-
roidal particles, which can be explicitly expressed 28. G
2
x
x is the exterior-point Eshelbys tensor for penny-shaped
cracks. It can be calculated as the special case of G
1
xx by
setting the aspect ratio of spheroidal particles equal to zero. More-
over,
*
1
and
*
2
are the equivalent eigenstrains of spheroidal
inclusions and penny-shaped cracks, respectively. The explicit ex-
pressions for these tensors can be found in the study of Sun et al.
9.
Particles are usually made of ceramic materials having high
stiffness. Thus, we assume that the particles only show elastic
behavior for the whole loading range. At the same time, the duc-
tile matrix has an elastoplastic response and a local von Mises
J
2
-yield criterion is assumed to control local plastic yielding in the
matrix. The local yield function can be written as:
F, e
m
p
=

:I
d
: Ke
m
p
0 11
where e
m
p
and Ke
m
p
are the equivalent plastic strain and the iso-
tropic hardening function of the matrix-only material. Moreover,
I
d
denotes the deviatoric part of the fourth-rank identity tensor I.
Local stress in the matrix is obtained by collecting the stresses
caused by external loading, the perturbed stresses from the dam-
aged particles Eq. 10, and the perturbed stresses from the per-
fect undamaged particles. Since numerous particles are distrib-
uted in the matrix, an ensemble-volume homogenization process
is conducted to obtain the overall yield function for the composite,
as
F

= 1
1

H
m
Ke
p
0 12
where e
p
represents the effective equivalent plastic strain. The
expression of H
m
can be approximately obtained by neglecting
the interaction among neighboring particles as
H
m
=
0
:T:
0
13
where the fourth-rank tensor T takes the general orthotropic form
as
T
ijkl
= T
IK
1

ij

kl
+ T
IJ
2

ik

jl
+
il

jk
14
Explicit expressions of components T
IK
1
and T
IJ
2
can be found in
9. It is noted that Muras tensorial indicial notation is followed
here, in which repeated lower-case indices are summed up from 1
to 3, while upper-case indices take on the same numbers as cor-
responding lower-case ones, but are not summed up 27. Equa-
tion 13 can be rewritten as
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of spheroidal particles aligned in
the x-direction; the aspect ratio is dened as a
1
/ a
2
320 / Vol. 127, JULY 2005 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
H
m
= :T

: 15
where is the effective stress tensor and T

=P
T
T P. The general
relationship between the applied far-eld stress
0
and macro-
scopic ensemble-volume averaged stress is given by 28

0
= P: 16
where the fourth-rank tensor P reads
P = C
0
I + I S
1
S
1
+ C
1
C
0

1
C
0

1
C
0
1

1
17
Assuming a small deformation, the total macroscopic strain
consists of the elastic component
e
and the plastic component
p
.
The relationship between macroscopic stress and macroscopic
elastic strain
e
can be written as =C

:
e
, where C

represents
the effective elastic stiffness of composites. The overall plastic
ow of composites is postulated as associative. The macroscopic
plastic strain rate for PRMMCs takes the form of

p
=

18
where

is the plastic consistency parameter. Moreover, F

is the
overall yield function dened in Eq. 12. The simple isotropic
hardening function Ke
p
is proposed as
Ke
p
=
2
3

y
+ he
p

q
19
Here,
y
denotes the initial yield stress of matrix material, and h
and q signify linear and exponential isotropic hardening param-
eters. Therefore, an effective elastoplastic constitutive model has
been developed for particle reinforced metal matrix composites
with particle-cracking.
5 Simulation Results and Discussion
For a stress-controlled damage evolution, the factors that affect
the damage initiation Eq. 6 include external loading
0
or the
corresponding stress tensor
0
=C
0
:
0
, the microstructure the
aspect ratio of the particle , the critical damage strength
cri
,
and the elastic stiffness of the matrix and particles, which, if as-
sumed to be isotropic, can be represented by the Youngs moduli
and Poissons ratios E
0
, E
1
, v
0
, v
1
, respectively. The subscripts 0
and 1 represent the matrix and particles, respectively. A physical
analysis shows that the uncertainty of the composite damage
comes primarily from the microstructures including the particle
size, distribution, shape and the damage strength. In the current
study, two main factors: the uncertainty of the aspect ratio ,
which is related to the manufacture of particles and the micro-
structure of composites, and critical damage strength
cri
, which is
a result of the propagation of micro cracks inside the particles are
considered. Therefore, for simplication, in the following simula-
tion we will treat
0
as a deterministic variable, E
0
, E
1
, v
0
, v
1
as
random variables RVs with small uncertainties, and ,
cri
as
random variables with large uncertainties.
First, a parametric analysis of these factors is conducted. The
material constants are assumed to follow Normal distributions,
while the aspect ratio and critical strength are assumed to follow
Weibull distributions we will provide the experimental evidence
for this assumption later in the paper. The coefcient of variation
COV is used to indicate the uncertainty of a random variable,
dened as
COV=
SD

20
where SD and are the standard deviation and the mean of a
random variable, respectively. In the following simulations,
uniaxial loading tests are conducted, in which loading is in the
spheroidal particle-aligned direction. A SiCp/ Al PRMMC is as-
sumed. The total volume fraction of the particles is 15%. The
average of Youngs modulus and Poissons ratio of the matrix are
taken as
E
0
=70 GPa,
v
0
=0.3, respectively, and those of par-
ticles are
E
1
=450 GPa,
v
1
=0.2, respectively. The average as-
pect ratio is

=1.0 for spherical particles, and critical damage

strength is assumed to be 3 times the matrix yield stress, as

cri
=3
y
=0.9 GPa.
Figure 3 shows the effect of matrix property uncertainty on
damage evolution. The volume fraction of damaged particles
2
increases in proportion to external loading, which reects the evo-
lution process of the damage. The uncertainties of Youngs modu-
lus and Poissons ratio do not have signicant effects on damage
initiation in the early loading stage. This inuence is only notice-
able in the nal stage of evolution when
2
reaches the total
volume fraction =15%. A large uncertainty in the Youngs
modulus and Poissons ratio will delay the cracking from reaching
its maximum value, which is the state in which all particles have
cracked. Figure 4 shows that cracking evolution does not result in
a signicant change in shape when the COVs of particle Youngs
modulus and Poissons ratio change from 0.1 to 0.3. Because
damage initiation and early development are found to play a more
important role in composite modeling than the nal stage in dam-
age evolution, we can conclude that matrix and particle material
property uncertainties do not have a signicant effect on damage
Fig. 3 The parametric analysis of the effect of the uncertainty
of matrix properties on the cracking evolution a the effect of
the Youngs modulus; and b the effect of the Poissons ratio
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology JULY 2005, Vol. 127 / 321
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
evolution. As a result, these material properties can be treated as
deterministic variables instead of random variables. The removal
of such uncertainties can save computational time, while not sig-
nicantly affecting accuracy.
A similar parametric analysis is conducted for the aspect ratio
and critical damage strength. Figure 5a shows the effect of un-
certainty of aspect ratio on cracking evolution. A small amount of
uncertainty in the aspect ratio 0.1 in this gure causes a rapid
development in the early stage of its evolution; but no signicant
effect is observed in the nal stage. Compared with the other
variables, the uncertainty of critical damage strength has the most
signicant effect on the damage evolution process during the evo-
lution process. From Fig. 5b, a large COV of critical damage
strength is shown to lead to a rapid development in the early stage
and a slow evolution in the nal stage. This is due to the fact that
when overall stress is low, the average stress inside a particle is
lower than the average critical damage strength. Thus, a large
COV under low particle stress causes a higher probability of dam-
age. On the other hand, under a high particle stress level, the
average particle stress is higher than the average critical damage
strength; therefore, a large COV leads to a slow development of
damage. To accommodate these observations, the aspect ratio
and the critical damage strength
cri
will be treated as random
variables in the following simulations.
The effect of aspect ratio average values and critical damage
strength on damage evolution is shown in Fig. 6. A large aspect
ratio of particles causes a rapid damage evolution Fig. 6a,
because the stress inside a particle increases in proportion to the
particles aspect ratio. With an increase in external loading, the
stresses in all particles go beyond critical damage strength regard-
less of a particles shape. This can be a reection of the fact that
there is no noticeable effect of aspect ratio on the nal stage of a
damage evolution. Compared to the aspect ratio, the change in
critical damage strength leads to a signicant difference in dam-
age evolution. Figure 6b shows that small critical damage
strength implies that the particles damage easily; therefore, the
volume fraction of damaged particles evolves rapidly and reaches
maximum value during an early loading stage.
To verify the Monte Carlo method proposed in the paper, simu-
lation results are compared with the experiment conducted by
Llorca et al., involving SiCp/ Al2618 PRMMCs 4. In their ex-
periment, a uniaxial loading test was performed and the particles
were aligned in the loading direction. D
max
and D
min
represent the
maximum and minimum diameters of the particles, respectively.
The characteristics of the SiC particles are measured as 4
D
max
SD= 10.6 7.2 m
D
min
SD= 5.4 3.0 m
Fig. 4 The parametric analysis of the effect of the uncertainty
of particle properties on the cracking evolution a the effect of
the Youngs modulus; and b the effect of the Poissons ratio
Fig. 5 The parametric analysis of the effect of the uncertain-
ties of a the aspect ratio and b the critical stress on the
cracking evolution
322 / Vol. 127, JULY 2005 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
SD= 0.56 0.19 21
In experimental observation, the distributions of both the aspect
ratio and the geometry of particles follow Weibull distribution.
Because we do not have the statistical data for the critical damage
strength
cri
, we assume that
cri
is proportional to the volume of
the particles, which with the spheroidal shape assumption, can be
expressed as
V =

6
D
min
2
D
max
22
This assumption is due to the fact that critical damage strength is
directly related to the number of possible pre-existing microcracks
inside the particles, and the larger a particle is, the greater the
number of initial defects that can be found. Using Eq. 22 and the
rst-order Taylor series expansion, the mean
V
and SD of the
volume of a particle can be expressed as

V
=

6

D
min
2

D
max
23
and
SD
V
=

6
4
D
min
2

D
max
2
SD
D
min
2
+
D
max
4
SD
D
max
2
24
respectively. Substitute the corresponding values Eq. 21 into
the above equations, and
V
=161.76 m
3
and SD
V
=182.90 m
3
can be obtained. The assumed linear relationship
between critical damage strength
cri
and particle volume V can
be expressed as

cri
=
V

cri
25
In this way,
cri
becomes a random variable with mean

cri
and
standard deviation SD

cri
=SD
V

cri
/
V
. Up to now, the follow-
ing inputs for a Monte Carlo simulation have been obtained for
the SiCp/ Al2618 PRMMCs: the probability properties of the par-
ticles aspect ratio, and critical damage strength. Before we begin
our simulation, however, one more parameter needs to be ad-
dressed: average critical damage strength

cri
. With the assump-
tion that particle cracking is rooted in the microcracks, an estimate
for

cri
can be made from fracture mechanics theory. Because a
microcrack is usually much smaller than particles by order, a par-
ticle could be treated as an innite domain. The Stress Intensity
Factor K
I
for a Mode-I straight crack located inside an innite
domain can be expressed as
K
I
= a
0.5
26
where a is the radius of the crack and is the normal stress acting
on that crack. For SiC, K
I
=4.8 MPa, and we can assume that the
averaged radius of a microcrack inside the particle is on the order
of one-tenth of the particles radius, written as a=0.1D
min
/ 2
=0.27 m. Then, the external normal stress can be calculated as
5.2 GPa, which will be used as an estimation of

cri
. Figure 7
shows the damage evolution obtained using Monte Carlo simula-
tion with inputs of and
cri
from the experimental measure-
ments and the above computations. Good agreement with the ex-
perimental result is obtained. The consistency between the
simulation and experiment shows the validity of the proposed
Monte Carlo method as a means to predict damage evolution
when direct experimental measurement is hard to conduct. The
two inputs used to perform a Monte Carlo simulation are the
distribution characteristics of the aspect ratio and critical dam-
age strength
cri
. The information regarding is not difcult to
obtain because it should be ready when a detailed fabrication pro-
cess is known. Critical damage strength
cri
is another property
that is only related to the particles, and it can be obtained either
from direct experimental measurement, or from an indirect
method, such as the one used in this numerical example.
Fig. 6 The effect of the average values of a the aspect ratio
and b the critical stress on the cracking evolution
Fig. 7 The comparison of the damage evolution between the
MC simulation and the experimental results 4
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology JULY 2005, Vol. 127 / 323
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
6 Concluding Remarks
While time-consuming, the Monte Carlo simulation conducted
in the paper provides a feasible way to predict damage evolution
in metal-matrix composites. It not only provides a physical veri-
cation for the usages of the Weibull probability function to phe-
nomenologically represent damage evolution in composite model-
ing, but also further determines the Weibull parameters when
experimental results are not available for a specic composite.
Applying simple statistical function with explicit formulation to
represent damage evolution could save computational time, and
has obvious advantages in theoretical modeling. The Weibull
probability function introduced in Sec. 2 is a simple, acceptable
way to depict damage evolution in a phenomenological manner.
In summary, the Monte Carlo simulation is applied to predict
the microstructural damage evolution of composites. As an ex-
ample, the particle-cracking evolution is discussed in detail for
metal matrix composites with spheroidal particles that are ran-
domly distributed but aligned in the matrix. Simulation results
show that the particle aspect-ratio and critical damage strength are
the dominant factors that have the most signicant effect on dam-
age evolution. A comparison with experimental methods shows
the validity of the proposed framework in predicting the overall
damage evolution of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites.
The Monte Carlo simulation has fewer limitations as a statistical
method. It is straightforward to extend the proposed framework to
deal with general loading conditions and complex damage mecha-
nisms. It is noted that several advanced methods, such as impor-
tance sampling, can be adopted to maintain similar levels of ac-
curacy with less running time.
Acknowledgment
This work is sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant Nos. CMS-0084629 and CMS-0303955.
References
1 Schwartz, Mel M., 1996, Composite Materials Volume I, PrenticeHall PTR,
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
2 Clyne, T. W., and Withers, P. J., 1993, An Introduction to Metal Matrix Com-
posites, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3 Suresh, S., Mortensen, A., and Needleman, A., 1993, Fundamentals of Metal-
Matrix Composites, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
4 Llorca, J., Martin, A., Ruiz, J., and Elices, 1993, Particulate Fracture During
Deformation of a Spray Formed Metal-Matrix Composite, Metall. Trans. A,
24A, pp. 15751588.
5 Zhao, Y. H., and Weng, G. J., 1996, Plasticity of a Two-Phase Composite
With Partially Debonded Inclusions, Int. J. Plast., 12, pp. 781804.
6 Zhao, Y. H., and Weng, G. J., 1997, Transversely Isotropic Moduli of Two
Partially Debonded Composites, Int. J. Solids Struct., 34, pp. 493507.
7 Zhao, Y. H., and Weng, G. J., 2002, The Effect of Debonding Angle on the
Reduction of Effective Moduli of Particle and Fiber-Reinforced Composites,
J. Appl. Mech., 69, pp. 292302.
8 Sun, L. Z., Ju, J. W., and Liu, H. T., 2003, Elastoplastic Modeling of Metal
Matrix Composites With Evolutionary Particle Debonding, Mech. Mater., 35,
pp. 559569.
9 Sun, L. Z., Liu, H. T., and Ju, J. W., 2003, Effect of Particle Cracking on
Elastoplastic Behaviour of Metal Matrix Composites, Int. J. Numer. Methods
Eng., 5614, pp. 21832198.
10 Liu, H. T., Sun, L. Z., and Ju, J. W., 2004, An Interfacial Debonding Model
for Particle-Reinforced Composites, Int. J. Damage Mech., 14, pp. 163185.
11 Derrien, K., Fitoussi, J., Guo, G., and Baptiste, D., 2000, Prediction of the
Effective Damage Properties and Failure Properties of Nonlinear Anisotropic
Discontinuous Reinforced Composites, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.,
185, pp. 93107.
12 Brechet, Y., Embury, J. D., Tao, S., and Luo, L., 1991, Damage Initiation in
Metal Matrix Composites, Acta Metall. Mater., 39, pp. 17811786.
13 Caceres, C. H., and Grifths, J. R., 1996, Damage by the Cracking of Silicon
Particles in an Al7Si0.4Mg Casting Alloy, Acta Mater., 441, pp. 2533.
14 Li, M., Ghosh, S., Richmond, O., Weiland, H., and Rouns, T. N., 1999,
Three-Dimensional Characterization and Modeling of Particle Reinforced
Metal Matrix Composites Part II: Damage Characterization, Mater. Sci. Eng.,
A, 266, pp. 221240.
15 Weibull, W., 1951, A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability,
J. Appl. Mech., 18, pp. 293297.
16 Llorca, J., Martinez, J. L., and Elices, M., 1997, Reinforcement Fracture and
Tensile Ductility in Sphere-Reinforced Metal-Matrix Composites, Fatigue
Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 205, pp. 689702.
17 Wilkinson, D. S., Maire, E., and Embury, J. D., 1997, The Role of Hetero-
geneity on the Flow and Fracture of Two-Phase Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng.,
A, 233, pp. 145154.
18 Gonzalez, C., and Llorca, J., 2000, A Self-Consistent Approach to the Elasto-
Plastic Behaviour of Two-Phase Materials Including Damage, J. Mech. Phys.
Solids, 48, pp. 675692.
19 Segurado, J., Gonzalez, C., and Llorca, J., 2003, ANumerical Investigation of
the Effect of Particle Clustering on the Mechanical Properties of Composites,
Acta Mater., 51, pp. 23552369.
20 Eckschlager, A., Han, W., and Bohm, H. J., 2002, A Unit Cell Model for
Brittle Fracture of Particles Embedded in a Ductile Matrix, Comput. Mater.
Sci., 25, pp. 8591.
21 Lewis, C. A., and Withers, P. J., 1995, Weibull Modeling of Particle Cracking
in Metal Matrix Composites, Acta Metall. Mater., 4310, pp. 36853699.
22 Lee, K., Moorthy, S., and Ghosh, S., 1999, Multiple Scale Computational
Model for Damage in Composite Materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech.
Eng., 172, pp. 175201.
23 Wu, H. C., Chang, K. J., and Schwarz, J., 1976, Fracture in the Compression
of Columnar Gained Ice, Eng. Fract. Mech., 8, pp. 365372.
24 Wu, H. C., and Chang, K. J., 1978, Angled Elliptic Notch Problem in Com-
pression and Tension, J. Appl. Mech., 452, pp. 258262.
25 Eshelby, J. D., 1957, The Determination of the Elastic Field of an Ellipsoidal
Inclusion and Related Problems, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 241, pp.
376396.
26 Eshelby, J. D., 1959, The Elastic Field Outside an Ellipsoidal Inclusion,
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 252, pp. 561569.
27 Mura, T., 1987, Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, 2nd ed., Kluwer Aca-
demic, Dordrecht.
28 Ju, J. W., and Sun, L. Z., 2001, Effective Elastoplastic Behavior of Metal
Matrix Composites Containing Randomly Located Aligned Spheroidal Inho-
mogeneities, Part I: Micromechanics-Based Formulation, Int. J. Solids
Struct., 38, pp. 183201.
29 Hori, M., and Nemat-Nasser, S., 1993, Double-Inclusion Model and Overall
Moduli of Multi-Phase Composites, Mech. Mater., 14, pp. 189206.
30 Shodja, H. M., and Sarvestani, A. S., 2001, Elastic Fields in Double Inhomo-
geneity by the Equivalent Inclusion Method, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 681,
pp. 310.
324 / Vol. 127, JULY 2005 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/16/2013 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms