riday 1S March 213 8:39:22 !ST hIIp://www.papimi.gr/universiIy.

hIm
!RST PRODUCD ON 7/6/21

AdisIinguished universiIy proIessor a dear Iriend and coIIeague, Ihough, noI a cIaimer or a responder by himseII, buI being caIIed
by us, made Ihe IoIIowing irreIevanI and unsuccessIuI remark: Ihe passing eIecIronIhrough Ihe our main capaciIor C
1
wiII change
iIs capaciIance and wiII rearrange iIs charge. Our answer is: sowhaI?
However, we may connecI addiIionaI capaciIors C
2
....,C
v
Io iI Io increase Ihe IoIaI capaciIance oI Ihe C
1
capaciIor, soIhaI Ihe IoIaI
capaciIance, Io any desired degree, wiII noI be changed Io any degree, we wanI. SecondIy, rearrangemenI oI charges may occur in
Ihe pracIicaIIy consIanI
poIenIiaI maincapaciIor C
1
. The Iorce IieId inIhe main capaciIor wiII remain unchanged Ioany desired degree. AddiIionaIIy
rearrangemenI oI charges wiII dissipaIe energy, iI Ihe maIeriaI oI Ihe capaciIors are noI super conducIing or near enough
superconducIing This dissipaIive energy oI rearrangemenI was unaccounIed. !I wiII be addiIionaI Iree generaIed energy, Iaking inIo
accounI Ihis unaccounIed energy wiII noI oppose Ihe passing eIecIron Ior Ihis a pure eIecIrosIaIic case and Ihe opposing ruIe oI
Lenz is noI appIicabIe, which is a IacI enhancing our Ihesis here.
Similarly, three other Proessors romthe three main universities in Greece were calledby us with the same
unsuccessul remarks and answers.
At the remark whywe do not publish the above at a main stream peer review ]ournal, our answer was the subject is too
revolutionaryto be accepted in to a main stream]ournal. The act that so ar no one mayanswer the subject is more
than needed to be publishedin a such ]ournal, dominated by the conservative establishment eguivalent to a dictatorship,
by an anonymous andunsignedreport o presumedobjective reeree. one shouldbe more than naive to believe this
process. The best domain or publication is the public domain o the internet or some one, not needing any more
credentials. Such conventional gualiications are not the point, but the truth at the end o some one's Proessional
Career which tights himinto conormism anddictatorship o modern science.
NLW14j7j2010
Finally, another riendproessor repliedater our individual invitation. His reply was that the closedline integral o
work is zero ! Because the potential o point charges is gjr, which is known to make the closedpath line zero. Our
answer is: in gjr both numerator is a unction andthe denominator is a unction so the this is case o a point charge
with the g a constant, but a unction. For the above closed path, irst going through the capacitor and returning rom
ar out o this capacitor where the electric ield is zero, but guidedvia magnetic ields which are known to produce no
work. The line integral o work or the return path is zero. For the irst going path is non zero as it has been shown here
Thereore, the orth and back closed line integral is not zero indicating the overall charge distribution on the capacitor
does not produce a conservative ield, contraryto a discrete inite and constant point charges. The superposition
principle or ininite charges (with the power o continuum) does not hold true One has to carrytwo integration. First o
riday 1S March 213 8:39:22 !ST hIIp://www.papimi.gr/universiIy.hIm
all source charge unctions, secondly over the path integral along the route o the trajectoryo the passing test electron.
This should be done in this strict order- the natural order, and not in the opposite than the natural order, considering g
always as unction not a constant. I some one thinks the opposite rom what we claimedhere, is invitedto point our
mistake and prove the opposite FORA RLWARD AGAIN OF 100000 LUROS or the irst correct claimer.
Lven the potential o a point non constant charge is not gjr, though irrelevant here. Also the stationary charge has to
rely on a small material body. On the material small body, induced charges will emerge in the presence o another
charge disturbing the point like potential o the irst charge. For example neutral small objects are always attractedby
electriied bodies with or - charge.
MAIN POINT: g IS NOT A CONSTANTPOINT CHARGLBUT A FUNCTION OF SPACL AND PARTICULAR OF r
PTP 14j7j 2010
Proessional Mathematician
Proessional Phycist
THLSTRONG SCILNTIFIC DICTATORSHIP OF 400 IS OVLR
Notice 0, The let or entering electron end eect is always accelerating, avouring our conclusions and results or the
creation or excess energy.
Notice 1, the above answer o ours is applicable to my youngest son (also Phycist) remarks.
Notice 2, my older son (also Phycist) remains silent.
Notice 3, "the power o continuum" implies the principle o "perect induction is not applicable or an uncountable set as
the continuumcharges that g is a unction itsel"
Notice 4. Common mistakes carried byPhycists in calculating the above work on the moving electron, as gbeeing a
constant
THL MOSTCOMMON MISTAKL
The most common mistake done by physists and physical books is to consider ga constant andnot a unction as really it
is in this case. Also to reverse the natural order o the two integration. First the integration o distributed source charges
with the integration o the closed line integral. Bydoing so the line integral o the orce o a distributed on the capacitor
single (CONSTANT, WRONG) charges on the moving charge, is known to provide zero.- Constant point charge to constant
point charge interaction along a closedpath is known or the total work to be zero. Then integrating o a zero unction
over all the capacitor points, one gets a result -the line integral o a zero unction is zero - in other words, the wished
result. The arbitrary error was to consider the charge as a non unction andto reverse the natural order o integration.
In Mathematics this can be done providedcertain mathematical conditions or the integral are ulilled which are
usually ignoredby most Physists, which have a gross knowledge o Proessional Mathematics.

THLPAPPAS THLORLMOFFILLDS FOR LLLCTRICCHARGLS
THLORLM
Fromthe above we conclude obviouslythe ollowing theorem. The electric ield o an isolatedpoint charge is proven to
be conservative andto posses a potential unction gjr. However, the electric ieldo continuous distribution o point
electric charges (unctions) may not be conservative andnot to posses a potential unction.

BASIC KNOWLLDGL FORFILLDS
A ield is called conservative when any closedline integral o work is zero. A conservative ield is characterizedby a
potential. A non conservative is not associatedby potential unction
MAGNLTISM
Similar and more complicatedis the situation in magnetism or actual y in interaction between two arbitrary currents or
more preciselyinteractions between moving charges. The author has experience o orty years on these interaction and
the relevant conservation o energy will be presentedshortlyhere...
Here we are. This presenIaIion wiII be posIed graduaIIy as iI wiII be deveIoped as Iime permiIs Ior shorI periods oI Iimes each
occasion. The eIecIromagneIic Iorce wideIy accepIed physics, is described by Ihe LorenIz Iorce Iaw =e(8xu/c
2
) where iI is
riday 1S March 213 8:39:22 !ST hIIp://www.papimi.gr/universiIy.hIm
composed oI an eIecIrosIaIic parI and one pure magneIic parI 8exIerior producI wiIh Ihe Ihe veIociIy u. Due IoIhe magneIic
parI. acIionand reacIion is noI eguaI and opposiIe. This is Ihe mosI sIrange parI which is very weII known and accepIed in
convenIionaI physics by Ihe mosI buI noI aII (Iike me, Ior exampIe).. WhaI is is noI weII knownis IhaI 8 shouId be due Io a cIosed
circuiI and onIy IhaI. Many Iricks are incorporaIed Ioovercome Ihis, Ihe biggesI Irick is IhaI oI exchanged virIuaI phoIons in
microscopic physics. 8uI noIhing is done Ior macroscopic physics. or aII Ihese reasons ! wiII suggesI insIead oI LorenIz Iorce Iaw
Ihe eguivaIenI and unknown Ioday Iorce Iaw oI Ampere
or Iaking inIoaccounI Ihe couIomb inIeracIionand Ihe eguivaIence !ds = gv
orming Ihe IoIIowing circuiI we noIice IhaI Ihe Iamp is brighIer when Ihe arcing device is arcing compared when Ihe arcing
The materialization o circuit o diagram1. is due to the latePhycist Leon Dragone. Its explanation is due
to Proessor Pappas
device is arcing. This can be expIained onIy by Ihe ampere Iaw. The veIociIy oI Ihe charge carriers in Ihe copper wires is oI Ihe
order oI mm/s, Ihough Ihe veIociIy oI charge carriers in Ihe arcing Ihe veIociIy Ihere is much much bigger. The expIanaIion by Ihe
Ampere Iaw is as IoIIows. This IawexhibiIs a IongiIudinaI Iorce compressing Ihe carriers. As Ihe currenI inIerrupIs due Ioarcing,
Ihe sIowmoving charges inIhe meIaIIic conducIors sIops reIaIive sooner wiIh Ihe IasI moving charges inIhe arc. So, Ihere is shorI
period oI Iime IhaI Ihere sIiII an isoIaIed currenI in Ihe arc wiIhouI arespecIive currenI inIhe resI meIaIIic circuiI. This causes shorI
IengIh oI currenI inIhe arc Io decompress, providing an excess energy wiIh a noise. This phenomenon is anaIogous Io IighIning in
Ihe sky Irom Ihe cIouds wiIh a sIrong noise which is caIIed Ihunder. This phenomenonoccurs where Ihe CeoIogicaI eIecIric IieId is
Iowered Ihan Ihe normaI CeoIecIricaI IieId oI good weaIher. aIIing severaI IighIings IromIhe sky, Ihe CeophysicaI raises back Io
normaI aI Ihe end. This resuIIs IhaI IighIning is noI discharge process, as commonIy beIieved, a charging process which gives
energy Io Ihe CeoIogicaI IieId! A phenomenon oI generaIionoI energy Iromenergy, This aIsoexpIains why PAP!M! is over uniIy as
a sparking device. ..D
RRNCS:
1. The CardinaI LawoI IecIrodynamics, Ihe principIe oI ConservaIion oI nergy, and Ihe TesIa MagniIying eIIecI. Proceedings oI
Ihe 1988 !nIernaIionaI TesIa Symposium. PubIished by Ihe !nIernaIionaI TesIa SocieIy !nc. !S8N -962394-2-X
2. L!CHTN!NC by MarIinA. UIman 1969 - Dover !S8N : -489-64S7S-4
3. L!CHTN!NC diIed by R. H. CoIde VoI. 1, VoI. 2 - Academic Press 1977 !S8N : -12-28781-9
riday 1S March 213 8:39:22 !ST hIIp://www.papimi.gr/universiIy.hIm
4. ARLY LCTRODYNAM!CS - by R.A.RTricker - ed Pergamon Press 196S
S. ATreaIise OnIecIriciIy And MagneIism by ]ames CIerk MaxweII - VoI. 1, VoI. 2 - ed DOVR
6. Kcpduvikd 4divcvd : Hdvdyim:ou O. Hdd - k. XPYZH Z!PA - A0qvd 1987 -
- L!CHTN!NC PHNOMNA Panos T. Pappas ed. COLDN SR!S AIhens 1987
ASSUMLD DISADVANTAGL OF THL AMPLRL LAWINCORPORATINGTHL COULOMBIC INTLRACTION
OVLR THL RLLATIVISTICLAWOFLORLNTZ.
Conusion withthe inertial reerence rames.
!I is Irue IhaI Ihe IawoI Ampere incorporaIing Ihe corresponding CouIombic inIeracIionand Ihe corresponding IoIhe LorenIz
eIecIromagneIic Iorce Iaw, is noI reIaIivisIic invarianI, Ihough Ihe LorenIz Iorce Iawis invarianI Io Ihe LorenIz IransIormaIions Ior
Ihe ReIaIiviIy Iheory oI insIein Our answer is: Who cares?. Whocares IhaI Ihe moIion oI arIh around Ihe Sunis noI ReIaIivisIic
invarianI ? Who cancIaim IhaI according Io ReIaIiviIy Iheory, iI is Ihe same Io say iI is eguivaIenI Iosay IhaI Ihe sunand Ihe resI oI
Ihe sIars move around Ihe arIh wiIhouI Iaughing ? We oIIer again1 uros Io any one whocan poinI us IwoinerIiaI Irames
oI ReIaIiviIy, e.i. which move wiIh consIanI reIaIive veIociIy u. The reIaIiviIy Iheory has never being experimenIaIIy conIirmed !
WhaI has been conIirmed is Ihe conIirmaIionoI naIure's Iaws wiIh Ihe noninerIiaIy moving arIh and Ihe resI oI Iree IaIIing space
ob|ecIs. !I wiII be inIeresIing Io make a IesI oI Ihe AmperianIorce IawIo see Iowhich veIociIy corresponds on Ihe arIh. !I wiII be
nonsurprising Io discover Iike Ihis Ihe absoIuIe veIociIy oI Ihe arIh around Ihe Sunand Ihe absoIuIe veIociIy oI Ihe Sunin Ihe
CaIaxy eIc, which cIassicaI AsIronomy unambiguousIy deIermines accuraIeIy, insIead oI deaIing wiIh nonphysicaI Iheories Iike
Ihe ReIaIiviIy Theory noI corresponding Io reaIiIy. ResuIIs observed Iroman acceIeraIed arIhIy IocaIed reIerence Irame are
wrongIy aIIribuIed Io ReIaIiviIy Iheory. SimiIarIy, resuIIs reduced Io a soIar reIerence Irame aIIached Io Ihe sun and having noIhing
Io dowiIh anearIh observer, as observed by an arIh observer are aIIribuIed wrongIy Io ReIaIiviIy Iheory, Ihough Ihere is i no
connecIionbeIween observer's Irame and Ihe acIuaI reIerence Irame oI observaIion. (IypicaI exampIe is Ihe HaIaIe and KeaIing
experimenI which conIuses Ihe acIuaI acceIeraIing Irame oI reIerence on Ihe posiIionoI Ihe observer wiIh IhaI oI Ihe sun's,
aIIegedIy conIirming ReIaIiviIy Theory.)

Convenienceandeasiness, insteado doing real andhardcalculations

!nsIead oI doing reaI hard IromIirsI principIes caIcuIaIions, iI is Iar easier Io cIaimconservaIion oI energy and IopresenI a ready
exisIing resuII eguaI Io Io an exisIing and known amounI oI energy. Thus deIerring, Ior exampIe, Ihe IinaI veIociIy. This Iaziness
or inIeIIecIuaI impoIence deveIoped inIoan eIIecIive dicIaIorship oI Ihe principIe oI conservaIionoI energy. !n order Ioshowour
prooI above, we had Io reIy on proIoIype and brain sIorming argumenIs, noI an easy IhaI average normaI scienIisI cannoI evenI. !I
wouId be much easier buI wrong IocIaim IromIhe beginning Ihe principIe oI conservaIion oI energy and IocIaim againwrongIy
and ad hoc IhaI Ihe kineIic energy enIering our capaciIor on Ihe IeII was Ihe same kineIic energy exiIing Ihe capaciIor onIhe
righI, since Ihe capaciIor had spend no energy, and IoconcIude IhaI Ihe IinaI veIociIy wouId be eguaI IoIhe iniIiaI veIociIy. !I wouId
had been a sIandard procedure buI giving Ihe wrong answer Ior a Iess sophisIicaIed scienIisI.
A newer claimcomes rom an invited University
Proessor o a Northern University or sections (4) and
(4a).
Our answer Io(4a) is incIude in Ihe inaI ReporI and concIusionoI Ihis (4a) secIion. Our answer Io (4) is as IoIIows. The rigorous
prooI oI nonconservaIion is inIhe prooI using variaIionIechnigues in secIion(4). !nIhe ob|ecIionIhaI Ihe eIecIronenIering Ihe
enIrance oI Ihe capaciIor is aIready Io a poIenIiaI Ior compensaIing Ior baIancing Ihe gained energy. Thi is wrong Ior Ihe reIurning
eIecIron IoIIows a paIh IhaI is Iree oI Iorces and no where has spenI a work. TheniI canbe considered Io have spenI a work Io
have gained any poIenIiaI energy. ..D. Ioour Iavour.
SCILNCL IS SLLF LOCKLD IN TO A STRONG
DICTATORSHIP FOR 400 YLARS
riday 1S March 213 8:39:22 !ST hIIp://www.papimi.gr/universiIy.hIm
I DONOTWANTMORL CRLDLNTIALS AND POSITIONS. I WILLNOTTAKL,
THANKYOU.
PROFLSSOR P.T. PAPPAS, Ph.D.

ReIerences :
www.papimi.grjpanospappas.htm

How21sI CenIury PhysicisIs Are Censored, Suppressed www.rense.com/generaI77/21.hIm
Addressing Ihe NeedIor reedomin ScienIiIic Research hIIp://archiveIreedom.org/casehisIories.hIm
OrweII's ThoughI PoIice are aII Ioo reaI www.uri-geIIer.com/as1.hIm
CogniIive Processes andIhe Suppression oI SoundScienIiIic !deas hIIp://amasci.com/supress1.hImI
Suppression oI dissent .uo.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/supp.html
Peer reviewas schoIarIyconIormiIy www.uow.edu.au/arIs/sIs/bmarIin/dissenI/documenIs/ss/ssS.hImI
CLOSEMINDED SCIENCE http://amasci.com/eird/close.html
TSLARASD ATTH SM!THSON!AN...
8ias in Ihe ScienIiIic LiIeraIure hIIp://d12391.mydomainwebhosI.com/]OT/Links/Iinks-bias.hIm
BENDING SCIENCE http://.books.gr/VieShopProduct.aspx?Id5090288