Table 6

Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed

January 1 Through December 31, 2013
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
TOTAL 2,331 2,158 4 117 21 3,744 709
FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS
FEDERAL TOTAL 377 331 - 9 7 632 58
ALABAMA, MIDDLE - - - - NP - -
ALABAMA, NORTHERN 2 2 - - - - -
ALABAMA, SOUTHERN 3 3 - - - 5 -
ALASKA 2 2 - - - 9 -
ARIZONA 9 9 - - - 1 -
ARKANSAS, EASTERN 3 2 - - - 10 -
ARKANSAS, WESTERN 1 1 - - - 6 -
CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL 23 20 - - - 14 2
CALIFORNIA, EASTERN 6 6 - - - 15 2
CALIFORNIA, NORTHERN - - - - NP - -
CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN 17 15 - - - 33 1
COLORADO 23 22 - - - 12 8
CONNECTICUT 9 9 - - - - -
DELAWARE - - - - NP - -
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 4 4 - - - 8 8
FLORIDA, MIDDLE 5 5 - - - 26 16
FLORIDA, NORTHERN 1 1 - - - - -
FLORIDA, SOUTHERN 8 8 - - - 4 -
GEORGIA, MIDDLE 4 4 - - - 4 -
GEORGIA, NORTHERN 12 11 - - - 23 -
GEORGIA, SOUTHERN - - - - NP - -
IDAHO - - - - NP - -
ILLINOIS, NORTHERN 34 20 - 3 7 21 -
ILLINOIS, SOUTHERN 3 2 - - - - -
INDIANA, NORTHERN 1 - - 1 - - -
INDIANA, SOUTHERN 10 7 - 3 - 28 -
IOWA, NORTHERN 5 5 - - - 5 -
IOWA, SOUTHERN 1 1 - - - 19 -
KANSAS - - - - NP - -
KENTUCKY, EASTERN 4 4 - - - - -
KENTUCKY, WESTERN 12 10 - - - 10 -
LOUISIANA, EASTERN 4 4 - - - 12 -
LOUISIANA, MIDDLE 1 1 - - - - -
LOUISIANA, WESTERN 2 2 - - - - -
MAINE 4 4 - - - 17 -
MARYLAND 9 9 - - - 56 7
MASSACHUSETTS - - - - NP - -
MICHIGAN, EASTERN 2 2 - - - 4 -
Page 1 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS (Continued)
MISSISSIPPI, NORTHERN 3 3 - - - 5 -
MISSISSIPPI, SOUTHERN 1 1 - - - - -
MISSOURI, EASTERN 23 21 - - - 26 -
MISSOURI, WESTERN 4 4 - - - 13 -
NEBRASKA - - - - NP - -
NEVADA 1 1 - - - - -
NEWHAMPSHIRE - - - - NP - -
NEWJERSEY - - - - NP - -
NEWMEXICO 6 6 - - - 1 -
NEWYORK, EASTERN 1 1 - - - - -
NEWYORK, NORTHERN - - - - NP - -
NEWYORK, SOUTHERN 7 7 - - - 47 -
NEWYORK, WESTERN 5 4 - 1 - 29 -
NORTH CAROLINA,
EASTERN
4 3 - - - - -
NORTH CAROLINA, MIDDLE 1 1 - - - - -
NORTH CAROLINA,
WESTERN
2 2 - - - 3 -
OHIO, NORTHERN 1 1 - - - - -
OHIO, SOUTHERN - - - - NP - -
OKLAHOMA, WESTERN 8 8 - - - 44 -
OREGON 6 6 - - - 30 -
PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN 4 4 - - - - -
PENNSYLVANIA, MIDDLE - - - - NP - -
PENNSYLVANIA, WESTERN - - - - NP - -
PUERTO RICO - - - - NP - -
RHODE ISLAND 1 1 - - - 7 -
SOUTH CAROLINA - - - - NP - -
TENNESSEE, EASTERN 4 3 - 1 - 20 3
TENNESSEE, MIDDLE - - - - NP - -
TENNESSEE, WESTERN - - - - NP - -
TEXAS, EASTERN - - - - NP - -
TEXAS, NORTHERN 13 13 - - - 27 -
TEXAS, SOUTHERN 32 25 - - - 16 2
TEXAS, WESTERN 18 17 - - - 19 6
UTAH - - - - NP - -
VIRGINIA, EASTERN 6 2 - - - 3 3
VIRGINIA, WESTERN - - - - NP - -
WASHINGTON, WESTERN - - - - NP - -
WEST VIRGINIA, NORTHERN - - - - NP - -
WEST VIRGINIA, SOUTHERN - - - - NP - -
WISCONSIN, EASTERN 1 1 - - - - -
Page 2 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS (Continued)
WISCONSIN, WESTERN - - - - NP - -
WYOMING 1 1 - - - - -
ARIZONA
MARICOPA 5 5 - - - 34 7
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 21 10 - 11 - 201 44
YUMA 3 3 - - - 5 -
CALIFORNIA
ALAMEDA 19 19 - - - 49 14
CONTRA COSTA 4 4 - - - 31 -
FRESNO 5 5 - - - 12 -
IMPERIAL 2 2 - - - - -
KERN 10 10 - - - 5 -
KINGS 15 15 - - - 34 -
LOS ANGELES 144 141 - 2 - 49 -
MERCED 1 1 - - - 10 6
MONTEREY 11 11 - - - 59 32
ORANGE 4 4 - - - 5 -
RIVERSIDE 330 330 - - - 250 11
SACRAMENTO 8 8 - - - 4 -
SAN BERNARDINO 43 43 - - - 100 1
SAN DIEGO 18 18 - - - 20 14
SAN JOAQUIN 8 8 - - - 4 -
SAN LUIS OBISPO 3 3 - - - 13 1
SAN MATEO 1 1 - - - - -
SANTA BARBARA 5 5 - - - 5 1
SANTA CLARA 14 14 - - - 10 -
SHASTA 2 2 - - - - -
STANISLAUS 13 13 - - - 9 3
VENTURA 13 13 - - - 25 5
COLORADO
1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(JEFFERSON)
2 2 - - - - -
4TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT (EL
PASO)
12 12 - - - 36 16
8TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(JACKSON/LARIMER)
- - - - NP - -
10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(PUEBLO)
7 7 - - - - -
17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(ADAMS)
26 26 - - - 123 8
18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(ARAPAHOE)
- - - - NP - -
Page 3 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
COLORADO (Continued)
19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(WELD)
3 3 - - - - -
20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(BOULDER)
- - - - NP - -
21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(MESA)
15 15 - - - 52 35
CONNECTICUT
HARTFORD 3 3 - - - 13 -
FLORIDA
4TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(DUVAL)
60 60 - - - 26 9
5TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(LAKE/MARION)
8 8 - - - 50 6
6TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(PINELLAS)
1 - - 1 - 3 1
7TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(VOLUSIA)
5 5 - - - 23 -
8TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(ALACHUA)
1 1 - - - 1 -
9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(ORANGE/OSCEOLA)
3 2 - 1 - 52 -
12TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(SARASOTA)
1 1 - - - 2 2
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(PALM BEACH)
3 3 - - - - -
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(BROWARD)
2 2 - - - 12 -
18TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(BREVARD/SEMINOLE)
9 9 - - - 54 22
19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(SAINT LUCIE)
7 5 - 2 - 54 5
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 24 19 - 5 - 96 5
GEORGIA
BELL-FORSYTH 4 4 - - - 6 -
CARROLL 1 1 - - - - -
CHATHAM 5 - - 5 - 24 4
CHEROKEE 38 38 - - - - -
COBB 46 45 - 1 - 14 2
DEKALB 3 3 - - - 1 1
DOUGLAS 3 3 - - - 35 15
FULTON 5 5 - - - - -
GWINNETT 5 5 - - - 16 -
HOUSTON 5 5 - - - 19 7
OCONEE 2 2 - - - 5 5
ROCKDALE 2 2 - - - 4 3
Page 4 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
GEORGIA (Continued)
SUMTER 2 2 - - - - -
WAYCROSS 4 4 - - - - -
WHITE 1 1 - - - 61 13
ILLINOIS
COOK 24 22 - 1 1 - -
DUPAGE 21 - - 21 - 35 6
LAKE 12 12 - - - 32 8
WINNEBAGO 3 3 - - - 6 -
KANSAS
FORD 1 1 - - - 3 3
GEARY - - - - NP - -
JOHNSON - - - - NP - -
LOUISIANA
4TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(OUACHITA AND
MOREHOUSE)
- - - - NP - -
24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(JEFFERSON)
1 1 - - - 13 -
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE 9 9 - - - 30 -
BALTIMORE CITY - - - - NP - -
FREDERICK 4 4 - - - 6 5
HARFORD 19 19 - - - 58 -
HOWARD 8 8 - - - 5 -
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 2 2 - - - 10 1
WICOMICO 1 1 - - - 8 -
MASSACHUSETTS
BERKSHIRE 10 10 - - - 12 -
MIDDLESEX 1 1 - - - 10 3
MINNESOTA
RAMSEY 4 4 - - - 23 12
MISSISSIPPI
COVINGTON 4 4 - - - - -
LEE 1 1 - - - - -
NEWTON 3 3 - - - - -
OKTIBBEHA 2 2 - - - - -
TISHOMINGO 1 1 - - - - -
Page 5 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
NEBRASKA
DOUGLAS 7 7 - - - 8 4
NEVADA
CLARK 178 151 - 27 - 134 78
NEW JERSEY
ATLANTIC 6 5 - - 1 - -
CAMDEN - - - - NP - -
CAPE MAY 5 3 - - 2 7 -
CUMBERLAND 3 3 - - - - -
ESSEX 9 8 - 1 - 24 5
GLOUCESTER 3 3 - - - - -
HUDSON 19 10 - 7 2 55 23
MERCER 3 3 - - - - -
MIDDLESEX 1 - - 1 - - -
MONMOUTH 3 3 - - - 24 3
OCEAN 1 1 - - - 28 -
SALEM 11 11 - - - 82 -
SOMERSET 13 10 - 3 - 15 -
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 18 4 - 14 - - -
UNION 1 1 - - - 1 -
NEW MEXICO
8TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(TAOS, COLFAX, UNION)
1 1 - - - - -
NEW YORK
BRONX 11 9 - - 2 - -
ERIE 1 1 - - - - -
KINGS 6 6 - - - 2 -
MONROE - - - - NP - -
NASSAU 1 1 - - - 13 2
NEWYORK 35 34 1 - - 136 36
NY ORGANIZED CRIME
TASK FORCE
7 6 - 1 - 46 3
NYC SPECIAL NARCOTICS
BUREAU
134 134 - - - 132 23
ONEIDA - - - - NP - -
QUEENS 168 162 1 2 3 105 29
RICHMOND 10 10 - - - - -
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - - - - NP - -
SUFFOLK 18 18 - - - 24 4
WAYNE 3 3 - - - 9 9
Page 6 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 19 19 - - - 45 5
OHIO
CUYAHOGA 2 2 - - - - -
FRANKLIN 1 1 - - - 4 -
HAMILTON 3 3 - - - 2 -
OKLAHOMA
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 9 9 - - - 99 51
OREGON
LANE 1 1 - - - 9 -
MARION 3 3 - - - - -
PENNSYLVANIA
BERKS 7 5 2 - - - -
MONTGOMERY 9 7 - 2 - 9 2
PHILADELPHIA 17 14 - - 3 4 -
POTTER - - - - NP - -
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 25 25 - - - 48 11
TENNESSEE
10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(BRADLEY)
3 3 - - - - -
11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
(HAMILTON)
4 4 - - - - -
16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(RUTHERFORD)
3 3 - - - - -
18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(SUMNER)
- - - - NP - -
19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(MONTGOMERY)
11 11 - - - 7 -
30TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
(SHELBY)
- - - - NP - -
TEXAS
BURNET 3 3 - - - 21 -
EL PASO 1 1 - - - 24 -
HARRIS - - - - NP - -
WISCONSIN
DANE 1 1 - - - - -
WYOMING
FREMONT 1 1 - - - 10 9
NATRONA 4 4 - - - 18 18
Page 7 of 8
Table 6
Types of Surveillance Used, Arrests, and Convictions for Intercepts Installed
January 1 Through December 31, 2013 (Continued)
Reporting Jurisdiction
Orders for
Which
Intercepts
Installed
Wire
(Incl. Any Type
Telephone:
Standard, Cell,
Mobile)
Oral
(Incl.
Microphone,
Eavesdrop)
Electronic
(Incl. Digital
Pager, Fax,
Computer)
Combination
Number of Persons
Arrested Convicted
NP = No prosecutors report. NI = Never installed.
Combination refers to installed intercepts for which more than one type of surveillance was used.
Convictions resulting from an intercept often do not occur within the same year in which the intercept was first reported. See Tables 8 and 9.
Page 8 of 8